a survey of the business benefits of adopting inter

24
A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER-ORGANISATIONAL SYSTEMS (lOSs) IN INDUSTRIAL MARKETS Pete NAUDE Manchester Business School United Kingdom email [email protected] Chris HOLLAND Manchester Business School United Kingdom email [email protected] Marion SUDBURY Business and Market Research United Kingdom ABSTRACT Business relationships are being revolutionised by the use of inter-organisational information systems which connect together separate companies' business processes. The physical value chain is now paralleled by the virtual, information chain. Detailed case studies from earlier research suggest that there are huge benefits to be gained from concepts such as EDI, shared product design databases, and shared production scheduling systems. However there is little statistical evidence of the overall usage and outcomes of IOS implementation. In this survey, IOS benefits are evaluated using marketing derived frameworks. Evidence from 89 UK based organisations, a large proportion of which are trading internationally, suggest that lOSs are becoming pervasive across different business processes and across different types of industry. The analysis reveals that marketing activities are now dominated by the management of the information along the supply chain and that significant benefits can be realised. However the time-scale for implementing such systems is of the order of 5 years and there are significant barriers to successful implementation. 499

Upload: others

Post on 17-May-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER-ORGANISATIONAL SYSTEMS (lOSs) IN INDUSTRIAL

MARKETS

Pete NAUDE Manchester Business School

United Kingdom email [email protected]

Chris HOLLAND Manchester Business School

United Kingdom email [email protected]

Marion SUDBURYBusiness and Market Research

United Kingdom

ABSTRACT

Business relationships are being revolutionised by the use of inter-organisational information systems which connect together separate companies' business processes. The physical value chain is now paralleled by the virtual, information chain. Detailed case studies from earlier research suggest that there are huge benefits to be gained from concepts such as EDI, shared product design databases, and shared production scheduling systems. However there is little statistical evidence of the overall usage and outcomes of IOS implementation. In this survey, IOS benefits are evaluated using marketing derived frameworks. Evidence from 89 UK based organisations, a large proportion of which are trading internationally, suggest that lOSs are becoming pervasive across different business processes and across different types of industry. The analysis reveals that marketing activities are now dominated by the management of the information along the supply chain and that significant benefits can be realised. However the time-scale for implementing such systems is of the order of 5 years and there are significant barriers to successful implementation.

499

Page 2: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

1 INTRODUCTION

About 10,000 companies in the UK currently use EDI, the electronic exchange of

pre-formatted data between co-operating organisations, and the number is said to be

growing at a rate of 20-30% per year (Cox and Ghoneim, 1994). The UK is one of the more

advanced markets in Europe in terms of EDI adoption, possibly due to sponsorship of a

move to EDI by the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) in the late 1980s. Despite this

level of activity, however, to date there has been little quantitative primary research into the

use, implementation and benefits of EDI in the UK. The initial quantitative work was

undertaken in the USA (Williams, 1994; Banerjee and Golhar, 1994). Even case study work

(Holland, Lockett and Blackman, 1992a,; Jelassi and Figon, 1994; Krcmar et al, 1995) has

tended to focus on the US and Continental Europe rather than the UK. Recently, Imperial

College produced a UK study (Cox and Ghoneim, 1994) but this was focused at the micro

level (sectoral differences) rather than the macro level (overall UK experience of EDI).

In addition, there has been a tendency to study the systems themselves and the benefits they

bring rather than considering the wider context of the business environment. In particular

there has been little work looking at EDI in the context in which it operates - that of

industrial marketing and purchasing. The focus is rather on the fact that the introduction of

electronic technology such as EDI may have the potential to alter how marketing is carried

out. Perez and Freeman (1988), for example, suggest that information and communications

may be the fifth "Kondratiev wave", with the key technologies shaping the way that markets

develop in the late twentieth century, affecting organisational forms and interaction.

Conversely, however, changes in marketing and purchasing in recognising the role that

inter- and intra-organisational networks can play are themselves preparing the ground for

EDI, making their use seem more logical and appropriate. In short, it is important to focus

on the "complementarity" of developments in the demands of marketing and purchasing in

general with changes in technological capability. Given this viewpoint, it was felt that there

was a need for an examination of EDI in the UK, covering its usage and benefits, and to set

this in the context of industrial marketing and purchasing in the UK more generally.

500

Page 3: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

2 BACKGROUND TO EDI ADOPTION

We have defined EDI as the exchange of pre-formatted electronic information across

organisational boundaries. To this extent we are considering it as a form of relationship

between two separate organisations or companies. For most potential users it therefore

represents an interaction typically focused on a buying-selling relationship. In order to

consider the different areas of potential application for EDI, the IMP Group suggests that in

any interaction between parties there are four types of exchange: products or services,

information, finances, and social exchange (Hakansson, 1982).

Early work on the adoption of EDI in the UK by Frost and Sullivan (1988) suggested that it

was being considerably under-utilised in all four of these areas of potential application.

According to the DTI, however, following a drive in the UK in the late 1980s the UK is

now ahead of other European countries in terms of its adoption and there are 10,000 or

more users in the UK, some of them relatively sophisticated. Certain industries are

particularly well served, notably grocery retailing (where for example Tesco and Sainsbury

have organised themselves around EDI trading) and the automotive industry, with its

Automotive Transaction Highway linking "everyone" in the industry. One factor which

seems to have been notable these sectors is the backing of a strong trade body which has

ensured industry standardisation. Other industries (e.g. pharmaceutical) are less well

advanced although explanations for why this is so are rather vague and unconvincing (Cox

and Ghoneim, 1994).

Holland et al (1992a) carried out an analysis of 18 US and 7 European companies who were

leaders in the application of EDI systems in their own industries. From this they suggested

that the time that elapsed from the initiation of an EDI project to its successful completion,

when the majority of trading partners were linked electronically, was typically around five

years. In their study, those who had started EDI more than 10 years ago were moving on to

second generation systems. Other work (King, 1994; Yovovich, 1994) suggests that for

501

Page 4: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

companies where EDI is already broadly disseminated the next step is to "deepen" each

application. Rather than looking for new applications, organisations should ail to add depth

to the potential levels of data shared; giving rise to the so-called "virtual corporations" or

"extended enterprises." As argued by Keen (1991) and shown in Figure 1, it is only by

optimising both reach (to whom can we connect?) and range (what services can we share?)

that such truly open systems will result.

Figure 1

The Reach and Range of the I.T. Platform

Anyone. anywhere Customers, suppliers regardless of facility base.

Customers, suppliers depending on facility base

li iliacompany locations ~ ~ abroad

4 REACHTo whom can

__ we connect?

Internal location!

Integration path to fully "open"

RANGE What services can we share?

Standard Accessto independent Cooperate messages stored data transactors transacfons

[Source: Keen, 1991]

We believe there to be a number of factors that influence the rate of adoption of EDI

systems. These are discussed briefly below:

2.1 Product and Service Characteristics

Increasingly, it is the exchange of information, rather than of any of the other three

exchange dimensions identified by Hakansson that will determine the nature of the EDI

502

Page 5: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

relationship (Naude and Holland, 1996). Therefore, we can hypothesise where the highest

levels of EDI usage will occur. For example, companies whose products have a high

information content (e.g. newspapers) will be early adopters of EDI for transferring large

volumes of text and graphics as well as more basic paperwork such as invoicing. Equally, in

companies where the information content of the process is high (e.g. airlines, banking), we

might expect the sharing of production information to be facilitated by the adoption of EDI.

In contrast to the "information intensity" approach used above, in industrial markets,

products that are otherwise lacking in unique benefits (i.e. are verging on commodity status)

tend to be bought because of the supplier rather than the brand Typically, suppliers

differentiate themselves on service factors: efficiency, reliability, speed of delivery, ease of

ordering, all of which are factors that can be enhanced by electronic EDI.

2.2 Industrial Structure

The type of value chain a company has and its stage of development might be expected to

affect the adoption of EDI (Porter, 1980). A company which is not highly vertically

integrated but has a relatively lengthy supply chain and is thus dependent for its margin on

close relations with suppliers and dealers might be expected to need electronic

communications at an early stage.

2.3 Globalization

There is no doubt that the volume of international transactions has increased dramatically in

recent years as a consequence of, amongst others, increasing deregulation. In this context,

larger companies with numerous international sites (requiring intra-organisational

information flows), and companies trading in geographically dispersed markets (requiring

inter-organisational flows) might be expected to have seen the need to adopt EDI, given the

complexity of their interlinkages and the need for fast and effective communication across

distances and time zones.

503

Page 6: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

A number of case studies (Holland et al, 1992a) and also preliminary quantitative work in

the UK by Cox and Ghoneim (1994) bears out some of these hypotheses: the majority of

their respondents were large companies. However, the retail sector, in the UK a largely

nationally-based sector, was the largest users of EDI, and pharmaceutical companies -

generally both large and global - had been slow to adopt EDI, suggesting that there are

other factors at work.

2.4 JIT and Reduction of Supplier Base

There is much evidence of the recent move to more collaborative relations between buyers

and sellers. Imrie and Morris (1992) for example suggest that there are certain trends

militating in favour of closer-collaborations and longer-term relations between firms, and

any reader of the financial press is aware of the trend to reducing the number of suppliers.

Clearly EDI has a role to play in supporting the development of these emerging

relationships.

3 THE BENEFITS OF AND VALUE FROM IMPLEMENTING EDI

In the terms of the IMP group (Ford, 1990), there are two major areas of benefit that will

come from a closer relationship between organisations or companies. These are an

economic dimension, in terms of a reduction in transaction costs and production costs; and

a control dimension, i.e. a reduction in environmental uncertainty, the uncertainty associated

with an input or output, or by increasing control over the other company. Going further,

Wilson and Jantrania (1993) suggest a model for conceptualising relationship value along

three dimensions: economic, strategic and behavioural, as shown in Figure 2.

In this model, the strategic dimension examines compatibility in that some portion of each

partner's goals must be seen to be met through the unique features of the EDI-based

relationship, to give for example the best combination of quality and price. Key to this

dimension is therefore some congruence in goals between the company and both its

suppliers and its customers. The behavioural axis is premised on the fact that social bonding

504

Page 7: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

leads to higher levels of commitment (Mummalaneni and Wilson, 1991). The economic

dimension examines aspects such as exact meaning of the terms are not defined in their

paper, but we define concurrent engineering (the reduction that can be achieved in

production costs as a result of shared information); value engineering (the value to both

companies of re-engineering their own processes to give greater synergy); and investments

quality (superior investment decisions taken given the shared understanding of each others'

processes).

Figure 2

Creating Value in Relationships

ECONOMICConcurrent Engineering

Investments Quality

Value Engineering

Cost Reduction

STRATEGIC

Social Trust Culture 'Goals Bonding

'Time to Market 'Strategic Fit

'Core Competencies

From: D. Wilson and S. Jantrania

BEHAVIOURAL

Source: Wilson and Jantrania, 1993

In the early stages of EDI, most of the discussion in the literature was around the simple

economic benefits of reduced costs due to streamlining of administrative systems. But

recent literature (e.g. Holland et al, 1992b; Krcmar et al, 1995) has argued that the

organisations that benefit most are those that incorporate EDI into their overall business

strategy, using it as a tool to secure more, longer-term business. Furthermore, given

505

Page 8: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

evidence that in some cases EDI does not result in cost-savings versus manual systems

(Krcmar et al, 1995) it is important to consider the non-financial benefits. For example,

from a strategic perspective, we might expect technology to be used to create or support a

unique benefit versus the competition, or to create a new product or service; while from a

behavioural perspective it might be expected to deepen links with existing, valued clients.

Table 1 indicates the different types of benefit that have been identified in the literature,

organised so as to conform to the Wilson and Jantrania typology.

Table 1

Identified EDI Benefits

Financial Benefits

Improved Cash Management Holland et al(l 994)

Reduced Costs Rockart and Short (1989)

Quality improvement of data and data transfer" Krcmar etal (1995).

Just-In-Time Money Transfer EIU (1994)

Strategic Benefits

Shorter product development lifecycles Naude and Holland (1996)

Reduction in Order Cycle Balsmeier and Voisin(1996)

Value Added Information Holland etal(1992b) Krcmar etal (1995)

Ease of global trade Holland etal(1992a)

New Products and ServicesFeldman, (1988)

Behavioural Benefits

Controlling distribution channels Jelassi and Figon (1994)

Alternatives to Acquisition Konynski and McFarlan (1990)

Forward Integration Holland etal(1992a)

Increased Trust Ring and Van de Yen (1994)

3.1 Measuring Value

Value must be measured in order to be sure whether the benefits of EDI outweigh its costs,

but the process remains problematic. Wilson and Jantrania (1993) argue that "the strategic

elements of relationships are the reason for creating relationships and yet they are the

most difficult pan to measure because of the need to project the future." For example,

506

Page 9: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

economic value is defined differently by accountants (recorded value, market value,

replacement value, earnings potential); by economists (value in use, exchange value, cost

value and of course the opportunity cost of not having something); and by marketeers

(economic value to customer, value in use). Success must ultimately be measured in private

sector companies by the market share or customer satisfaction benefits that accrue and the

extra profits they bring. However, such longitudinal research has its own associated

problems and was not an option in this case.

Another approach is to use a surrogate measure. For example, we can assess whether the

EDI used by a company was considered a success or not. Remenyi and Money (1991)

claim user satisfaction is "recognised by many IT researchers as an appropriate surrogate

for IT effectiveness". However, the intention in this study was to carry out the survey

amongst IT managers. It seemed unlikely that this sample would give an objective view of

whether the implementation of EDI was successful, given the stake that they had in the

system being seen as a success. There are oblique measures, however, which might prove

effective surrogates, the most basic being whether the company is continuing, or even

expanding, its use of EDI. Our approach in this research was to assess the extent to which

the respondents considered that their EDI systems had brought them certain benefits,

measured on a simple 5-point scale. A range of 22 different benefits were identified in the

literature, and were loosely categorised as covering production and sales patterns, business

development, cost savings, trust, and strategic issues.

4 OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY

The objective of this study was to contact organisations with experience of using EDI and

to identify the major benefits that have been realised. We also wished to link these to (a) the

stages in the development of the EDI systems within the companies concerned, (b) the

nature of the companies under analysis, and (c) developments in the business context in

which these companies are operating.

507

Page 10: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

The specific objectives were to:

* identify which business processes companies have converted to EDI

» quantify the business benefits to organisations, in particular looking for marketing

benefits that may have accrued

* set these in the context of developments in industrial marketing and purchasing in the

UK

A questionnaire was drawn up based on an analysis of available secondary data and was

piloted using a judgement sample of industry experts. The final version was then posted to

422 members of the EDI Association in the UK, of which 89 usable copies (21%) were

returned.

5 RESULTS

5.1 Composition of the Sample

The mix of respondents was influenced by the membership of the EDI Association, which

contained few retailers or automotive companies - sectors known to be heavy users of EDI.

The largest homogenous sectors represented were transport/shipping; construction; financial

services; government and the NHS. There were a variety of "manufacturing" respondents -

including amongst others pharmaceutical, steel, food, clothing, personal care products and

adhesives. There were also a variety of miscellaneous respondents including a utility, a

software house, a catalogue retailer, and a publisher. Details of the sample are given in

Table 2.

508

Page 11: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

Table 2 The Industries Represented

Sector

Transport/Shipping

Construction

Government

Financial Services

NHSManufacturing (various)Other

Total

No of Respondents

19

149

10

721

9

89

This sample composition gives an interesting slant to the results. For example, such high

returns from the construction industry were unexpected, as was the lack of domination by

the traditional "case study" sectors of automotive and retail. Most respondent companies

would be classified as large in terms of their numbers of employees. 81% of respondents

were from companies with more than 250 employees. Only 5% of companies turned over

less than £lm in the UK, and 54% more than £100m. When global turnover was taken into

account the large nature of many respondent companies was further emphasised: 22%

turned over more than £ 1000m.

5.2 The Importance and Use of EDI

For most of the respondents in our sample, EDI was a fairly important but not crucial part

of their business. 51% of the respondents stated that they "use EDI for some areas of our

business," and only 3 respondents claimed that the importance was such that their business

would cease to exist without EDI. The EDI systems had been in place a relatively long time

in terms of the typology set out by Holland et al (1992a): 30% were introduced more than 5

years ago and a further 37% between 3 and 5 years ago. Only 27% had been introduced in

the last 1-2 years.

509

Page 12: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

Figure 3 below indicates the areas of application, and also how effective the respondents

thought their systems were (measured on a 1-5 scale, with 5 being very effective). Two

separate sets of scores were generated, the first covering the effectiveness of the relevant

application between the respondent's company and their customers, and the second with

their suppliers. The scores in the figure are based only on the responses of those actually

using the relevant application. One of our most surprising findings was that the penetration

of EDI usage was lower than expected. Notably, hardly any type of EDI was being used

with customers by more than 50% of respondents and, other than E-mail, no more than 25%

of respondents were using any given type of EDI with suppliers.

Figure 3

The Use and Effectiveness of EDI

2345

Email

Price & spec, quotes

Sales order processing

Product development

Production scheduling

Quality control

Distribution

Invoicing

Payment/funds transfer

t, , , , ,

* I

' ! \]

. j i 1

g Customers

* Suppliers

510

Page 13: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

E-mail, sales order processing and invoicing were the most common areas of EDI usage,

used by 59%, 51% and 42% of respondents respectively, while 37% were using it for funds

transfer. As shown in Figure 3, these were also the areas where it was considered to be the

most effective. Very few were using it for production-related processes such as product

development, production scheduling, or quality control, reflecting the largely service-based

composition of the sample. These applications were also considered to be the least

effective. Overall, their were minor differences between the effectiveness in dealing with

suppliers or customers. As we might expect, product development and production

scheduling were seen as more effective when dealing with suppliers, while effectiveness of

quality control, distribution, and invoicing was higher when interacting with customers.

5.3 The Benefits and Value of EDI

An important aspect of this study was the quantification of which of the many benefits

claimed for EDI were seen as the most salient by its users. Using a 5 point scale,

respondents were asked to indicate the extent to which they agreed with various statements

relating to the benefits brought by their EDI systems. The results of this analysis are shown

in Figure 4.

The most interesting aspect of this figure is the ambivalent nature of the responses: most

statements were scored between 2.5 and 3.4, indicating to us that the respondents were not

exactly overwhelmed by the benefits accruing from their systems. Only two statements were

viewed particularly positively: the EDI had helped to improve service to customers, and had

helped to raise order frequency. On the other hand, there were a surprisingly high number

of statements with which the respondents did not agree. Among the most notable of these

was that EDI did not necessarily bring benefits in terms of:

* increasing supplier stability

* offering new information

* increasing global trade

511

Page 14: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

* increasing the depth of relationships

* decreasing time to market

Figure 4

The Benefits of EDI

CMertaquncy

Start tHaaOtr

SmtntocuMomr

DaftiornMonaHpa

B*tkr UM Of CMC* tta(

Improved tuppMr nMbradta

Trust nu penqiWte

TMthuhcraaM*)

This amounts to what we believe is a serious indictment of the EDI industry. If our results

are indeed representative of an industry's perceptions, the clearly EDI is failing to help

companies develop towards the deep and open systems envisaged by Keen. The one good

aspect to emerge from the study was that a lack of trust was not regarded as having been a

barrier to implementing their EDI system: it seems as if there exists a considerable amount

of latent goodwill in the industry.

512

Page 15: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

In order to determine the underlying dimensions of EDI benefits, the same dataset was

subjected to factor analysis, with the results appearing in Table 3 (only those factors with a

loading of greater than 0.4 are shown).

TableSResults of the varimax Rotated Factor Analysis

(Factor Loadings * 100)

VARIABLEOrder frequencyNew trading partnersNumber of suppliersSize of purchase orderSize of sales orderService to customerCustomer stabilitySupplier stabilityOffering new informationOffering services with other suppliersGlobal tradeMore business from current customersCosts of information handlingCoordination of production processesDepth of relationshipsBetter use of clerical staffImproved time to marketImproved customer relationshipsImproved supplier relationshipsTrust was a prerequisiteTrust has increasedLack of Trust a barrier

Fl7780797978

F2

7579

4382

4979

41

F3

89

58

83

F4

7980

47

F5

876663

F6

78

89

F7

7478

513

Page 16: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

We would suggest that these results indicate a high degree of overlap with the model

originally proposed by Wilson and Jantrania in 1993. The overlap in shown in Table 4,

where we find that our seven dimensions can all be described in terms of their original three

dimensions.

Table 4

The Underlying Dimensions of the benefits Experienced

Factor

FlF2F3F4F5F6F7

Suggested Interpretation of the Benefits

Trading/EconomicCustomer RelationsSupplier RelationsInformationTrustOperational EfficiencyEconomic

Wilson and Jantrania

CategorisationEconomicStrategicStrategic

BehaviouralBehaviouralEconomicEconomic

6 CONCLUSIONS

While this was a relatively small survey, we do feel that the results give some important

insights into an area of management that is both of increasing interest and that is also

subject to extraordinarily rapid change. This study identified a number of important trends

and perceptions that need to be highlighted, and each of these is discussed briefly below.

Although the sample size was too small to segment the data by industry type, we do add

sectoral insights below when these were felt to be of particular interest, hi additional, a

number of respondents gave us significant amounts of anecdotal information, and this is

referred to where relevant.

514

Page 17: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

6.1 Areas of EDI Application

The results indicated that EDI is most frequently adopted for purchasing and selling

functions and for funds transfer. The exchange of other sorts of information (e.g. production

data) is less common, although well developed in the transport industry (distribution

information). In terms of usage of different types of EDI, the more "glamorous" usages (for

example new informational products or an increase in global trade) were not seen as

benefits for our sample, which may suggest they are rare benefits for lucky or powerful

users. There appears still to be substantial room for the deepening of EDI to embrace

"start-to-finish" ordering, including the settling of accounts. A number of users felt they

were not yet experiencing the full benefit of EDI precisely because this was absent, with the

whole system still requiring substantial human intervention. The high initial costs seem to be

responsible for this, meaning its take-off has been slower than was hoped.

6.2 Maturity of EDI System

Previous research has indicated that the time for an EDI system to reach maturity to be

around 5 years (Holland et al, 1992a). However, our survey suggested the cycle is in many

cases longer. To make matters worse, usage of the systems in our sample were not as

"deep" as hoped for, given the length of time that the systems had been operational. Many

respondents to this survey were struggling with standards and technical issues as well as a

lack of perceived benefits. What we found was that companies that had first implemented

EDI up to 5 years ago could still be at a fairly preliminary stage of development, having

gone through a hiatus in which it appeared that the market and the technology were not yet

ready. The technological issues are of particular concern since, whilst we know that

numbers of users overall in the UK are high by European standards, it is not inconceivable

that the UK may lose this lead if another country makes a serious push - for example once

German telecommunications are deregulated this year.

In our sample, then, it seem as though companies were seeking differentiation rather than to

overcome the issues of high information content in their products or processes; and that they

515

Page 18: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

were hoping to increase the base of their trading partners rather than decreasing it through

their adoption of EDI. This is in direct contrast to what we might expect from the IMP

framework, with companies utilising EDI as a way to secure closer relationships with fewer

companies. Perhaps these emphases - particularly the former - in part explain why financial

EDI is having a slow take-off: the benefit of improved information it offers over existing

systems such as BAGS is simply not what companies are looking for when implementing

EDI.

6.3 Benefits of EDI

Turning to potential benefits, we set up a model for conceptualising relationship value along

the three dimensions outlined originally by Wilson and Jantrania (1993), and looked in

addition at some broader factors identified from the literature. In terms of benefits, our

findings do not agree with those of the Imperial College study (Cox and Ghoneim, 1994)

which found that the emphasis had moved on from customer service, reflecting what they

saw as a maturing EDI market. Customer relations and to a lesser extent supplier relations

were still firmly seen as benefits for our respondents. The more significant benefits claimed

in some case studies (increased global trade, offering of new information services based on

information databases) were not considered to be benefits of EDI by our sample. They were

also equivocal as to whether EDI locked in customers or suppliers or gave them the chance

to offer new services in conjunction with other companies.

In terms of economic benefits, simple cost reduction through the reduction of clerical staff

was seen as the most important benefit. The "relationship" benefits of closer co-ordination

were not in evidence. In line with the model by Wilson and Jantrania, respondents tended to

agree that trust was indeed a crucial pre-requisite to implementing EDI and that trust had

been increased as a result of EDI. Overall, however, potential value creation in the

relationship based on EDI experiences was lower for our sample than expected.

516

Page 19: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

6.4 Barriers to Implementing EDI

One of the most salient of our findings, and one that contradicts what is suggested in the

literature, is the extent to which technological problems are perceived as a barrier to the

successful implementation of EDI. An examination of the qualitative answers indicated that

problems concerning lack of common standards, lack of systems integration etc. and the

investment in time and money required to set up the system were between them mentioned

twice as often as lack of perceived benefits on the part of customers. With reference to

Figure 1, EDI has at present only reached the stage of being able to connect to customers

and suppliers dependent on their facility base. While EDI struggles to fulfil its promise in

terms of reach even for its limited range of standard messages and access to stored data,

alternative service providers - notably the Internet - are able to offer independent and

co-operative transactions (for example via E-mail and video-conferencing).

6.5 Measuring Value

When asked specifically how they measured the value of their EDI systems, no insightful

answers were forthcoming. However, this gives us an opportunity to test out the usefulness

of the Wilson and Jantrania model. According to the secondary literature, EDI can

contribute to many of the areas of value creation suggested by the model, via concurrent

engineering, improved time to market, increased trust etc. Yet if we look at the value our

respondents felt they were getting from their system few of these came through strongly:

* Respondents felt that "strategic value" was being created, feeling it important to

introduce EDI trading as an investment in the future of relationships with their

customers and suppliers, perhaps thereby moving closer to "shared goals". Yet in fact

they were realising few of the other strategic benefits Wilson and Jantrania would see

as adding strategic value: improved time to market, or strengthening of core

competencies. They were largely just computerising their sales ordering and payment

systems, although this did give some strategic benefit in terms of fostering

relationships with customers and suppliers.

517

Page 20: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

* Respondents were aware of the economic benefits in terms of cost reduction from

re-deployment of staff. But many saw the re-engineering side of the investment as a

cost, not a creator of value but a necessary evil.

* In terms of behavioural value, no one spontaneously referred to improved trust

between companies as a measure of the value of the relationship to them, although

when prompted many recognised that this had indeed taken place.

In conclusion, Table 5 indicates how we could tabulate our findings onto the Wilson and

Jantrania model. Overall, the level of perceived benefit is very low indeed.

Table 5

The Perceived Benefits of EDI

Axis

Strategic

Economic

Behavioural

Item

Snared Goals

Time to Market

Strategic Fit

Strengthening of Core Competencies

Concurrent Engineering

Investments Quality

Value Engineering

Cost Reduction

Social Bonding

Trust

Culture

Achieved via EDI?

Yes

No

No

No

No

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

7 DISCUSSION: IS EDI A SUCCESS? AND AT WHAT COST?

Is the value that was created for our sample by the introduction of EDI sufficient to justify

the investment in time and money it took? The obvious line is to argue that is dependent on

the company itself: whether they had the foresight to re-engineer, and whether or not they

chose an electronic relationship or were forced into it. However, given that some companies

will never have the vision, expertise or money to do these things, perhaps a more useful

518

Page 21: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

question for the future is to consider whether an alternative method could achieve as much

or the same as EDI for the same or less effort. We would argue that there is a very real

possibility of the Internet achieving that position in the future.

The Internet has progress to make: security of information remains a concern, as does

variable speeds of transmission. It also has some technological teething problems, with

difficulties for example facing CompuServe users attempting to send data files to Internet

users and vice versa. However, a number of recent development make rapid improvements

seem possible, however. In particular, the decision by Microsoft in December 1995 to

create products and services built on Internet standards rather than developing an alternative

on-line service, and the decision by MCI to upgrade its Internet infrastructure to give

superior speed and accuracy.

Returning to Table 5, we propose that the net has potential to at least provide the value EDI

has for our sample if not to outperform EDI on almost all of the benefits stated there. If

speed and security can be improved the net could provide all the strategic and economic

benefits offered by EDI; it could also arguably go further than traditional EDI in behavioural

terms, with the Internet providing the opportunity for some forms of electronic social

interaction. Hence, in terms of an agenda for future research our findings suggest in

particular that work is needed to look at the competitive situation of EDI - how its benefits

compare to those experienced by the limited number of companies who currently use the

Internet for the exchange of fairly sophisticated data.

The picture emerging from the UK is that although great achievements have been made, the

companies are only beginning to realise the business potential of EDI. There are

significantly more strategic, economic and behavioural value to be created than is currently

being achieved by the EDI relationships in our sample, especially when one compares the

overall position of this sample with leading edge users such as Chrysler (Mukhopadhyay et

al 1995), Motorola (Holland et al 1994) and Baxter (Short and Venkatraman 1992). These

519

Page 22: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

leading companies demonstrate the huge potential and the need for investment in IT and

organisational change over a long period of time, i.e. 10 or more years. The technical

problems experienced by the UK companies will undoubtedly become easier, given

developments in global telecommunications systems such as the internet. Changes to

business processes and industrial changes to relationships with economic partners will

continue to be a difficult and complex area, but one where the leading companies are

already enjoying significant strategic, financial and behavioural benefits.

ReferencesBalsmeier, P.W. and Voisin, W. (1996) "Supply chain management: A time-based strategy" Industrial Management, Vol. 38, No. 5, Sep/Oct, pp 24-27.

Banerjee, S. and Golhar, D. (1994) "EDI: Characteristics of Users and Non-Users", Information and Management, 26, pp. 65-74

Cox, B. and Ghoneim, S. (1994) Drivers and Barriers to Adopting EDI: A Sector Analysis of UK Industry, London: Imperial College

EIU (1994) "Superhighway or dead-end street?" 27th June, Vol. XX, No. 25, pp. 1-8.

Feldman, J. (1988) "Development Strategies for the World's Airlines", The Economist Intelligence Unit, Special Report No. 1733, London: EIU

Ford, D. (1990) (Ed.) Understanding Business Markets, London: Dryden Press

Frost & Sullivan (1989) EDI User Implementation Strategies, London, Frost & Sullivan

Hakansson, H (Ed.) (1982) International Marketing and Purchasing of Industrial Goods: An Interaction Approach, (A Study by the IMP Group), Chichester: John Wiley And Sons

Holland, C., Lockett, G., and Blackman, I. (1992a) "Electronic Data Interchange: A Comparison of US and European Cases", International Information Systems, October, pp. 14-37.

Holland, C., Lockett, G., and Blackman, I. (1992b) Planning for Electronic Data Interchange, Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 539-550 Is this correct?

520

Page 23: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

Holland C.P., A.G. Lockett, I.D. Blackman and J.M. Richard (1994) "The Evolution of a Global Cash Management System", Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 37-47.

Imrie, R. and Morris (1992) "A review of Recent Changes in Buyer-Seller Relations" OMEGA, 20:6, pp. 641-652

Jelassi and Figon (1994) "Competing through EDI at Brun Passot: Achievements in France and Ambitions for the European Single Market", MIS Quarterly, xxx

Keen, P. (1991) Shaping the Future: Business Design through Information Technology, Harvard: Harvard Business School Press

King, J. (1994) "Network Tools of the Virtual Corporation" Network World, April

Konsynski, B. and McFarlan, F. (1990) "Information Partnerships - Shared Data, Shared Scale," Harvard Business Review, 90:5, pp. 114-120

Krcmarh., Bjorn-Anderson, and O'Callaghan, R. (1995) EDI in Europe: How it Works in Practice, London, John Wiley and Sons

Mukhopadhyay, T., S. Kekre and S. Kalathur (1995) "Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange" MIS Quarterly, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 137-156.

Mummalaneni, V. and Wilson, D. (1991) "The Influence of a Close Personal Relationship Between a Buyer and a Seller on the Continued Stability of their Role Relationship", Working Paper, The Institute for the Study of Business Relationships, Pennsylvania State University

Naude, P. and Holland, C. (1996) "Business to Business Relationships" in: F. Buttle (Ed.) Relationship Marketing, Theory and Practice, pp. 40-54, London: Paul Chapman Publishing

Perez, C. and Freeman C. (1988) "Structural Crises of Adjustment, Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour" in: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (Eds.) Technical Change and Economic Theory, London, Pinter

Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press

Remenyi D. and Money, A. (1991) "A Holistic Approach to IS Effectiveness Measurement", Working Paper, Henley Management College

521

Page 24: A SURVEY OF THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF ADOPTING INTER

Ring P.S. and V,. Van de Ven (1994) "Development Processes of Cooperative Intel-organizational Relationships", Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 90-118.

Rockart, J. and Short, J. (1989) "IT in the 1990s: Managing Organisational Independence," Sloan Management Review, 29:1, pp. 33-41

Short J.E. and N. Venkatraman (1992) "Beyond Business Process Redesign: Redefining Baxter's Business Network", Sloan Management Review, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 7-21.

Williams, L. (1994) "Understanding Distribution Channels: An Interorganisational Study of EDI Adoption" Journal of Business Logistics

Wilson, D. and Jantrania, S. (1993) "Measuring Value in Relationship Development" Proceedings of the 9th IMP Conference, Bath: Bath University

Yovovich, (1994) "Groupware Offers Next High High-Tech Step" Business Marketing, September

522