a systemic functional micro-grammar of river plate spanish clitics
DESCRIPTION
A Systemic Functional Micro-grammar of River Plate Spanish Clitics. GeneSys_IDE Víctor M. Castel CONICET y UNCuyo Mendoza, Argentina. Figura 1. Figura 2. Figura 3. See sp4. Figura 4. Figura 5. See sp1. Figura 6. See sp2 . See sp3. Figura 7. See sp5 . See sp6 . See sp7. sp1. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
A Systemic Functional Micro-grammar of River Plate
Spanish Clitics
GeneSys_IDEVíctor M. Castel
CONICET y UNCuyoMendoza, Argentina
Figura 1
others 0%
thing 0%
situation reified 0%
SITUATION FOCUS NINFORMATIO
SITUATIONSOF ONCOORDINATI
IONSPECIFICAT POSITION TIME
relating-event 0%
linfluentia 0%
talenvironmen 0%
mental 0%
4) Fig. (to relational 35%
3) Fig. (to action 65%
TYTRANSITIVI
dependent 0%
2) Fig. (to tindependen 100%
DEPENDENCE
(1) situation congruent 100%
TYPESITUATION
situation 100%
TYPEENTITY
casual 75%
formal 25%
TENOR
written 100%
spoken % 0
MODE
entity
Figura 2
action for proposal 25%
future_trp 0%
past_trp 0%
ppresent_tr 100%
seeker onconfirmati 0%
seeker 0%
giver 100%
ninformatio 75%
POSITION REFERENCE TIME
MOOD_2
MOOD_1
Figura 3
process role-three 0%
7) Fig. (to
others 0%
manner 0%
range 0%
created 0%
(sp4) affected 100%
7) Fig. (to others 0%
agent 100%
others 0%
(7) peoplemeeting 100%
process role-two 100%
process role-one 0%
action
2 ROLE
1 ROLE
6) (Fig. THEMESUBJECT
5) (Fig. IALITYCOREFERENT
PEPROCESS_TY
TYPE
See sp4.
Figura 4
7) Fig. (to others 0%
carrier-affected 100%
3 ROLE
7) Fig. (to others 0%
possessed-affected 100%
2 ROLE
7) Fig. (to others 0%
agent 100%
1 ROLE
6) (Fig. THEMESUBJECT
5) (Fig. IALITYCOREFERENT
others 0%
(7) peoplemeeting 100%
PEPROCESS_TY
process role-three
process role-two
TYPE
relational
Figura 5
non_coref 35%
others 0%
(sp1) ercted_carrit_and_affecoref_agen 5%
(sp1) ssedcted_posset_and_affecoref_agen 10%
(sp1) ctedt_and_affecoref_agen 50%
IALITYCOREFERENT
See sp1.
Figura 6
arrier_sthaffected_c 5%
th(2)ossessed_saffected_p 15%
2) (sp3, thaffected_s 15%
(sp2) agent_sth 65%
THEMESUBJECT
See sp2.
See sp3.
Figura 7
nil 0%
feminine-non 55%
feminine 45%
nil 0%
plural 25%
singular 75%
nil 0%
specified 75%
erecoverabl 25% outsider 40%
(sp7) addressee 25%
(sp7) performer 35%
nil 0%
theme-subject non 75%
theme-subject 25%
(sp5/sp6) covert 10%
sought 25%
stated 65%
GENDER
NUMBER
TYPEPERSON
-STATUSTHEMATIC
TYPE
See sp5.
See sp6.
See sp7.
sp1sp1 : COREFERENTIALITY (two-role_process) = coref-X-and-Y :
SUBJECT-THEME(two-role-process) = {100% agent},SUBJECT-THEME(three-role-process) = {100% agent}.
/*If the same individual performs both the agent and the affected
(etc.)roles, then the agent is the subject-theme of the situation. In otherwords, it must be an active situation. Mutatis mutandis, for three-
roleprocesses.*/
sp2sp2 : SUBJECT-THEME( two-role_process) = agent_sth :
TYPE(agent) = {75% stated, 25% sought, 0% covert},
GENDER(agent) = {100% nil},
THEMATIC_STATUS(agent) = {100% subject-theme},
THEMATIC_STATUS(affected) = {100% non-subject-theme}.
/*Default specification for PERSON, NUMBER AND GENDER properties of the agent
participant:
PERSON(agent) = {35% performer, 25% addressee, 40% outsider, 0% nil>}NUMBER(agent) = {65% singular, 35% plural, 0% nil>}GENDER(agent) = {45% femenine, 55% non_feminine, 0% nil>}
If the agent is the subject-theme of the situation, then person and number properties remain as specified by default. Gender properties are undefined.
The thematic status of the agent and the affected are subject-theme and non-subject-theme, respectively.*/
sp3sp3 : SUBJECT-THEME( two-role_process) = affected_sth :
TYPE(affected) = {75% stated, 25% sought, 0% covert},
THEMATIC_STATUS(agent) = {100% non-subject-theme},
THEMATIC_STATUS(affected) = {100% subject-theme}.
/*Default specification for PERSON, NUMBER AND GENDER properties of the
affected participant:
PERSON(affected) = {35% performer, 25% addressee, 40% outsider, 0% nil}NUMBER(affected) = {65% singular, 35% plural, 0% nil}GENDER(affected) = {45% femenine, 55% non_feminine, 0% nil}
If the affected is the subject-theme of the situation, then person, number and gender properties of the affected remain as specified by default.
The thematic status of the agent and the affected are non-subject-theme and subject-theme, respectively.*/
sp4sp4 : ROLE-2 (two-role process) = affected :
coref_agent_and_affected TYPE(affected) = TYPE(agent),PERSON(affected) = PERSON(agent),NUMBER(affected) = NUMBER(agent).
non_coref PERSON (agent) = performer
PERSON(affected) = {0% performer},PERSON (agent) = addressee
PERSON (affected) = {0% addressee}.
/*If ‘coref_agent_and_affected’, then for each property of the Agent prefer identical properties for the Affected. This amounts to assigning 100% to properties of the Affected that have already been assigned to the Agent.
If ‘non_coref_af_af’, then if the Agent is the performer, the Affected cannot bethe performer. If the Agent is the addressee, then the Affected cannot be theaddressee.*/
sp5
sp5 : TYPE (agent) = covert :
THEMATIC_STATUS(agent) = {100% nil},
PERSON(agent) = {100% nil>},
NUMBER(agent) = {100% nil>},
GENDER(agent) = {100% nil>}.
/*If the agent participant is covert, then its thematic status, person, number and gender properties are undefined. */
sp6
sp6 : TYPE (affected) = covert :
THEMATIC_STATUS(affected) = {100% nil},
PERSON(affected) = {100% nil>},
NUMBER(affected) = {100% nil>},
GENDER(affected) = {100% nil>}.
/* If the affected participant is covert, then person, number and gender properties are undefined. */
sp7
sp7 : PERSON (affected) = performer or addressee :
(SUBJECT-THEME (two-role-process) = agent_sth)
GENDER(affected) = {100% nil}.
/* Except for passive situations, the performer and the addressee are undefined for GENDER and thus they are realized by the clitics ‘me/nos’ and ‘te/ustedes’, which are unmarked for gender:
Te saludo. Me saluda. Te saludás. Me saludás. Te saluda. Me saluda.
The verbal endings of the participle are marked for GENDER in passive situations:
Fuiste saludada. Fuiste saludado. Fui saludada. Fui saludado. Fue saludado. Fue saludada.
*/