academic(excellence( indicator(system( 201011( ·...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Academic Excellence Indicator System
2010-‐11 Annual Report and Public Hearing
Georgetown ISD February 16, 2012
![Page 2: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Comprehensive repor-ng system defined by statute
Published annually since 1990-‐91 Gives parents and community a snapshot of
District/Campus Performance (Sec-on I of AEIS Report)
District/Campus Profile (Sec-on II of AEIS Report) Contains all data used to determine District/Campus
accountability ra-ngs
Uses data collected through: State data repor-ng system (PEIMS)
Student assessment system
![Page 3: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
AEIS Report Cover Page
District/Campus 2010-‐11 Accountability Ra-ng
District PBM Special Educa-on Monitoring Results Status (if applicable)
District/Campus Gold Performance Acknowledgments
![Page 4: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Sec-on I: District/Campus Performance TAKS Performance/Par-cipa-on
Disaggregated by grade level & student group ARendance & Annual Dropout Rate Comple-on Rate College Readiness Indicators
Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Comple-on, RHSP & DAP Graduates, AP/IB Results, Texas Success Ini-a-ve -‐ Higher Educa-on Readiness Component (HERC), SAT/ACT Results, College-‐Ready Graduates (Class of 2010)
AEIS Report Overview – Three SecLons
![Page 5: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Sec-on II: District/Campus Profile Demographic data about students and staff Financial informa-on
Program informa-on
AEIS Report Overview – Three SecLons
Sec-on III: Bilingual Educa-on / English as a Second Language Report TAKS performance data for current year Limited English Proficient (LEP) students
![Page 6: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
AEIS: 2011 Accountability Standards
Academically Acceptable Recognized Exemplary
TAKS (2010-‐11) (including TAKS (Acc), TAKS-‐M, & TAKS-‐Alt) for All Students & each student group (African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadv.) mee-ng minimum size requirements
Meets each standard: Reading/ELA……. 70%
Wri-ng………….. 70% Social Studies…… 70% Mathema-cs……. 65%
Science………….. 60% OR Meets Required Imprv.
Meets 80% standard for each subject
OR Meets 75% floor and Required Improvement
Meets 90% standard for each subject
ELL Progress Indicator (2010-‐11) TELPAS or TAKS
All ELL Students ≥ 30 N/A
60% at or above criteria OR Meets Required
Improvement
60% at or above criteria OR Meets Required
Improvement
Commended Performance (2010-‐11) (including all TAKS) if meets minimum size for All Students & Econ. Disadv.
N/A Meets 15% standard for Reading/ELA and
Mathema-cs
Meets 25% standard for Reading/ELA and
Mathema-cs
Comple@on Rate I* (Class of 2010)
Meets 75.0% standard OR Meets Required Improvement (RI)
Meets 85.0% standard OR Meets floor of
75.0% & RI Meets 95.0% standard
Annual Dropout Rate* (2009-‐10)
Meets 1.6% standard OR Meets RI
Meets 1.6% standard OR Meets RI
Meets 1.6% standard OR Meets RI
* If meets minimum size: All Students, African American, Hispanic, White, Economically Disadvantaged
![Page 7: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
2011 Accountability Results for Georgetown ISD
Exemplary: Ford Elementary
Recognized Georgetown ISD Georgetown 9th Grade (EVHS) Cooper Elementary McCoy Elementary Frost Elementary Village Elementary Williams Elementary Purl Elementary Mitchell Elementary
Academically Acceptable: Georgetown High School
Richarte High School (AEA)*
Benold Middle School
Tippit Middle School
Forbes Middle School
PickeJ Elementary
Carver Elementary
*AEA – AlternaLve EducaLon Accountability System (The highest raLng allowed is Academically Acceptable.)
![Page 8: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Percent Met 2011 TAKS Performance Standard (Standard Accountability Indicator)
![Page 9: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
New Base Indicators:
English Language Learners Progress Indicator: 81%
Commended Performance:
Reading/ELA Mathematics All Students 41% 40% Econ. Disadv. 27% 25%
![Page 10: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CompleLon Rate I
Comple-on Rate I (HS) Grades 9-‐12 4-‐year cohort measure
Formula:
# Graduates + Con@nuers
# Graduates + Con@nuers + GED + Dropouts
Graduated
Continued High
School Received
GED
Dropped Out
![Page 11: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
CompleLon Rate I Class of 2010 (longitudinal data)
![Page 12: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
CompleLon Rate I (Standard Accountability Indicator) Class of 2010 (longitudinal data)
![Page 13: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
2011 Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 7-‐8, 2009-‐10) (Standard Accountability Indicator)
![Page 14: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
AddiLonal Indicators: College Readiness Indicators
Percent of high school students comple-ng an Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment in 2009-‐10: 24.3
Percent of 2010 graduates comple-ng the Recommended High School Program or Dis-nguished Achievement Program: 89.8
Advanced Placement (AP) results for 2009-‐10: % Tested: 18.3 % Examinees >= Criterion*: 75.2 % Scores >= Criterion*: 66.8
*3 on AP Exam
![Page 15: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Addi-onal Indicators: SAT/ACT Results for the Class of 2010
Percent Tested: All Students: 66.9 African Amer: 75.0 Hispanic: 50.3 White: 73.6 Eco. Disadv: N/A
Percent At/Above Criterion* All Students: 42.3 African Amer: 26.7 Hispanic: 25.0 White: 48.6 Eco. Disadv: N/A
Average SAT Score: GISD 1055 vs. 985 State Avg.
Average ACT Score: GISD 23.0 vs. 20.5 State Avg.
*1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
![Page 16: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
AddiLonal Indicators: Texas Success IniLaLve (TSI) Percent of 11th Graders MeeLng the Higher EducaLon Readiness Component
ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
![Page 17: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
AddiLonal Indicators: 2010 College-‐Ready Graduates
![Page 18: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
AEIS Report SecLon II -‐ Profile Student Informa-on
Enrollment data by grade level Ethnic distribution Other demographic statistics Graduate information Retention rates Average class size information
Staff Informa-on Type of staff Educational & experience level Salary data Turnover rate for teachers
Financial Informa-on Tax information Revenues Expenditures
Program Informa-on Student enrollment Teachers by program
![Page 19: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
SecLon III: Bilingual EducaLon/English as a Second Language Report 2010-‐11 District Performance Report for Current LEP Students
TAKS Met 2011 Standard (Sum of All Grades Tested)
Indicator: District – All Students Bilingual ESL
LEP – No Services
Reading/ELA 93% 79% 64% 87%
Mathema-cs 90% 82% 66% 88%
Wri-ng 93% 92% 65% 86%
Science 87% 71% 38% 33%
Social Studies 97% No Bilingual Students Tested
86% Fewer Than 5 Students Tested
All Tests 83% 67% 42% 74%
![Page 20: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Campus Performance ObjecLves
Campus Improvement Plans are based on the AEIS data.
Performance Objec-ves are approved by the Board of Trustees.
Data from the AEIS gives direc-on for the development of performance objec-ves that are low in rela-on to the accountability standards.
![Page 21: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Violent and Criminal Incidents
Texas statute (TEC 39.053) requires every district to publish an annual report on violent and criminal incidents at campuses in the district
The report must include: Number, rate, and type of incidents Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention
policies and procedures used by the district Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and
Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
![Page 22: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Violent and Criminal Incidents for 2010-‐11 Type # Rate Type # Rate
Controlled Substances (including felony violations)
8 0.08% Alcohol Offenses 4 0.04%
Criminal Mischief 1 0.01% Weapons Violation 11 0.11% Arson 0 0% Assault (on employee/volunteer) 5 0.05% Retaliation 1 0.01% Assault (not on employee/volunteer) 7 0.07% Cigarette/Tobacco 6 0.06% Fighting/Mutual Combat 4 0.04% Terroristic Threat & False Report
1 0.01% Public Lewdness & Indecent Exposure
4 0.04%
Conduct Punishable as a Felony
1 0.01% Other* 0 0%
*Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault, manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder
Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2010-11 Summer; GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2010-11 PEIMS Resubmission
![Page 23: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Student Enrollment and Academic Performance (Texas Higher EducaLon CoordinaLng Board – Required Report)
Data collected and reported by the THECB in an annual report: Report of 2008-‐2009 High School Graduates’ Enrollment and Academic Performance in Texas
Public Higher EducaLon in Fiscal Year 2010
Reports on student performance in postsecondary ins-tu-ons during the first year enrolled aner gradua-on from high school
District: Georgetown ISD Total
Graduates GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas
< 2.0 2.0 – 2.49 2.5 – 2.99 3.0 – 3.49 > 3.5 Unknown Four-Year Public University: GHS 166 26 28 35 49 28 0 Four-Year Public University: RHS 3 * * * * * * Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS & RHS 145 29 30 22 24 29 11 Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS 39 Not Trackable: GHS 12 Not Found: GHS & RHS 240 Total High School Graduates in GISD 605
GHS: Georgetown High School RHS: Richarte High School
*If enrollment in public higher educaLon is less than 25, the GPA data is omifed.
![Page 24: Academic(Excellence( Indicator(System( 201011( · Academic(Excellence(Indicator(System(201011(Annual(Report(and(Public(Hearing(GeorgetownISD(February(16,(2012](https://reader031.vdocument.in/reader031/viewer/2022031000/5b81008f7f8b9a7b6f8b59da/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Accessing the AEIS Report Where the report is available:
TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2011/index.html
GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Domain/146
Campus libraries or offices (available within 2 weeks of public hearing)
Central administration building (available within 2 weeks of public hearing)
Contact InformaLon
Becky McCoy, GISD Assessment Director
(512) 943-‐5000, ext. 6034
[email protected] • AEIS Reports (coming soon)