action plan: pd/evaluation
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Action Plan: PD/Evaluation](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/555755ecd8b42aa8378b53c7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Professional Development Plan
Activities Stakeholders/Person(s) Responsible
Expected Outcomes
Instructional staff professional development on using CSCOPE with a focus on integrating technology.
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, Chief Technology Officer
Provides training in how to efficiently and effectively use the online curriculum with a focus on integrating technology including but not limited to integrating interactive websites, wikis, nings and podcasts.
DMAC professional development
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, Chief Technology Officer
Training in how to efficiently and effectively use DMAC and its reports to access student and district data to target areas of concern.
STaR Chart Staff Development
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, Chief Technology Officer
Provide stakeholders with information on the STaR Chart—what it is used for, what the ratings mean, where we are, and where we would like to go.
Professional development in creating and facilitating an online course
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, Chief Technology Officer,and students
Online learning opportunities will be increased.
Professional development on effective technology integration strategies
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, Chief Technology Director
Further instructional staffs’ knowledge and skills in integrating technology; provide the opportunity for lesson relevancy for students—active engagement
Attend State Conferences Superintendent, Assistant Opportunity to network with
![Page 2: Action Plan: PD/Evaluation](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/555755ecd8b42aa8378b53c7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Superintendent, Chief Technology Officer, Instructional Technology Director,Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, and Instructional Staff
other practitioners; attend sessions presented by practitioners who can provide the advantages and disadvantages, do’s and don’ts on technology integration; gain new knowledge and project ideas
.
Evaluation of Action Plan including:
Effectiveness of Professional Development, Policy Improvements and Infrastructure
Strategy Stakeholders/Person(s) Responsible
Expected Outcomes
Timeline Evaluation
Collaborative technology integration planning using a ning or wiki to collaborate
Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Chief Technology Officer, Instructional Technology Director,Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, , and a sampling of campus instructional staff
More comprehensive plan for aquiring needed technology; provide campus principals with information on the types of technologies already available; help in integrating AEIS data, AYP data, and STaR Chart results in all planning; help the district and campus
2009-2010 academic year; ongoing
Completion and approval of district technology plan
![Page 3: Action Plan: PD/Evaluation](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/555755ecd8b42aa8378b53c7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
leadership budget for individual campus technology needs
Upgrade Infrastructure to support wireless technologies
Chief Technology Officer, Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent
Ability to provide mobile labs with laptops for classroom use; save money on having to run new wiring for current “drops”.
January 2010-August 2010
Completion of the project. All schools have wireless high-speed capabilities
Continue participation / contract for CSCOPE, a web-based curriculum
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Assistant Superintendent, and Instructional Technology Director
All instructional components of C-Scope including the parent portal will be used as the basis of all instruction as well as a tool for parent information and support.
ongoing State assessment data including AEIS data, increase the “met standard” rate as outlined in the CIP.
Acceptable Use Policy revision
Chief of Technology, Assistant Superintendent, and Instructional Technology Director
Policy is revised to increase the ease of use for online collaboration.
January 2010-August 2010
Completed and approved revisions allow students and teacher access to sharing and collaborative websites.
DMAC professional development
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director
Training in how to efficiently and effectively use DMAC and its reports to access student data to target
May 2011 Targeted student instruction will lead to a 5% decrease in students needing TAKS
![Page 4: Action Plan: PD/Evaluation](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/555755ecd8b42aa8378b53c7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
areas of concern.
remediation.
STaR Chart Staff Development
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director
Provide stakeholders with information on the STaR Chart—what it is used for, what the ratings mean, where we are, and where we would like to go.
May 2011 Current rating of Advanced Tech will increase to Target Tech.
Professional development in creating and facilitating an online course
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, and students
Provide additional course offerings for students
January 2010-August 2010
25% of teachers attending this pd will have an online course live by following school year.
Professional development on integrating interactive websites, wikis, nings, and podcasts into the C-Scope curriculum.
Instructional Staff, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technology Director, Chief Technology Officer
Provide instructional staff the opportunity to learn about and integrate technology into existing curriculum; provide opportunity for students to be more actively engaged in the lessons and in their learning.
Ongoing
(This curriculum is ever-changing; therefore the pd must be ongoing)
100% of instructional staff will provide evidence through lesson plans that they have used at least one of the listed tools in each content area.
Attend State Conferences
Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Chief Technology
Opportunity to network with other practitioners;
Ongoing Report relaying new learning and expectation of
![Page 5: Action Plan: PD/Evaluation](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082702/555755ecd8b42aa8378b53c7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Officer,Technology Director, Curriculum Directors, Campus Principals, Instructional Technologists, and Instructional Staff
attend sessions presented by practitioners who can provide the advantages and disadvantages, do’s and don’ts on technology integration; gain new knowledge and project ideas. Expectation of attendees to turn around new trainings.
implementation required by all attendees.
Online communication of new learning will be made available to all instructional staff through a district Wiki.