Department of DefenseInspector General

AD-A223 814

Semiannual Reportto the Congress

JUL1190

- D

-DISTIBUTION STCATEMENT A

A ycdfor~ public rwi.~se; IOctober1,l1989 to March 31,1990 -

This report has been provided, through the Secretary of Defense, to thefollowing Congressional oversig-ht committees: Senate Committee onGovernment Affairs, Senate Committee on Armed Services, House Committeeon Government Operations, and House Committee on Armed Services.

In addition, the report has been furnished to senior Department of Defensemanagers and the Inspectors General of the Military Departments and DefenseAgencies.

$'OR GPP

March 1990

FOREWORD

I am pleased to submit this report depicting the significant activities ofthe Office of the Inspector General, Department of Defense, and of theother DoD audit, inspection and investigative organizations fromOctober 1, 1989 to March 31,1990.

Vigorous and effective efforts to prevent, detect and take timely actionagainst fraud, waste and mismanagement affecting DoD programs aremore important than ever. In an era of changing requirements, decreas-ing budgets and intense interest in DoD management improvement, weintend to continue providing timely, constructive and candid advice to theSecretary of Defense, DoD managers and the Congress on how best tomeet the significant management challenges in Defense. We will concen-trate on significant problem areas--supply, acquisition, operational testand evaluation, automatic data processing, accounting, foreign militarysales, consultants, hazardous waste, product quality, cost mischarging,kickbacks, bribery, defective pricing and product substitution. We willalso work closely with the Department and Industry to encourage effectivecontractor self-governance and improved internal controls.

I urge particular attention to ourproposals in Chapter 6 for additionalauthorities to enhance our audit and criminal investigative efforts. I alsohope that the background data in the report, especially Appendix A, helpput the structure, challenges and workload of the DoD audit, inspectionand investigative community in perspective.

Susan J. CrawforInspector Genera

j -- -IjSTrUTiON STATEMEN A1

Approved for public r e ; j 9

TFABLE OF CONrI'ENrTS

Foreword .........................

TIable of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. iiiExecutive Summary ................................... .. v

Chapters_.1. -lnternaA'udits andjlnternal,Reviews I

- Z. .... ..... ....Organizational Structure ............ .......... /.................Operating Concepts ............................................ 1-

~-!:SigrificantCentra1,A'uditAdcomplishments .d ~............. 1-1FinancialMankagement 2 .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-1I ealth and, edical/Vrograms., ............................... 1-2Installations andaogistics.................................. 1-2ContractA'6ministration,)................................... 1-7MajorA'cquisition-.la44 .4. ............................... 1.8Other Acquisition........ ................................. 1-9

Other Internal Audits............................................ 1-10< a w~olicy and/Olversight................ ....... 1-12

General Accounting Office Report Analysis and.Pollowup .... 1-12D~epartment of D)efense Management Audit Followup Status Repoil ..

(Internal Audit)....................................... ..... 1-13Disputed IG Reports ................................... 1-15Significant Incomplete Corrective Actions .......... 1-15Followup System Reviews .................... . .............. 1-19

2. C ontrctgu~ijts - 2-1Access to Contracto Records ..................................... 2-1D)efense Contract Audit Agency.................................. 2-1

Audit Results ............................................ 2-1Significant I)CAA Audits ................................... 2-1

Incurred Cost Audits ..................................... 2-1Forward"Oricing Proposal Audits............................ 2-2IDefective Pricing Audits .................................. 2-2Operations Audits ...................................... 2-4Claims Audits.......................................... 2-4

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers .................................... 2-5Signif icant CoE Audits ..................................... 2-5

IG,.lDooD, Contract A udit Pol icy and Oversight........................ 2-6Contractor Risk Assesment Guide Program.......................... 2-7

,/Departmnent of Defense Management Audit Pollowup Status Report,' (Contract Audit) ............................................ 2-7 _______

3. (>Crim in a/nvestigations4.4 ................. 3-1 ession For-(Significant/raud .Cases .- c. ............................ 3-1 S RI

Product~Substitution..................3-1 GR&3 ' Ill '*' '' ''' ''' 'll '' I'l ''IC! TA BlDefbctivex~ricing..................................... 3-3Cost Jeischarghag)..................................... 3-5 nouxicedBid) Igging )........................................~ 3-5 ctlFalse elaims and ViYse~atemciits,............3-6

Other !ndictments and Convictions........................ 3-8 tribtation/<-Prevention Alctivities * ' ... . 3-10 iilability Code;

CiiaInvestigations -)Iicy and Oversight ............ 3-10Criina I .. va1 and/or

Special

4. >'0thertfv'estigations I X ...... ~ ................. 4-1T1O, DoD, Hlotline) . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 - 1

Significaitinvesti ye Findings

Orgnai rom IIotdine Contacts ........................ 4-110,al~uii .................................................. 4-3

Significant Cases.........................................4-5. Inspections; C(,.), -J-........................ 5-1

Significant lnspectio ns ..- I.6. (Legislative Testimony and I rposals, (LD6-i

Congressional Testimony................................... 6-IPositions on Proposed Legislation ............................. 6-2Recommendations for Congressional Action..................... 6-2Congressional Correspondence ............................... 6-3

AppendicesA. Dol) Audit, Inspection, and Investigative Organizations............... A-iB. Legislative Reporting Requirements ............................... B1-1C. Audit Reports ............................................... C-1D. 10, DoD), Audit Reports Issued Containing Quantifiable Potential

Monetary Benefits........................................ D- I

ExhibitsI a. D~ecision Status of Inspector General Issued Reports with Questioned Costs 1-13l b. D~ecision Status of Inspector General Issued Reports with

Recommendations that Funds be Put to Better Use............... 1-142. Status of Action on Central Internal Audits..................1-153 Status of 10, DoD, Reports Over 12 Months Old with Final Action P~ending 1-204. Contract Audit Reports Issued, DCAA.............................. 2-35. Contract Audit Reports Closed, I)CAA ............................. 2-36. Contract Audit Reports Issued, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ..... 2-57. Contract Audit Reports Closed, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ..... 2-68. Investigative Case Results...................................... 3-49. Investigative Case Results (Administrative Actions).......................... 3-710. T1heft/Fraud Investigative Case Inventory........................... 3-911. Table of Indictments, Convictions, or Recoveries...................... 3-1212 Dol) Hotline Program Analysis ................................... 4-2

IllustrationsModif ied MC- 130 Combat Talon aircraft ................................ 1-3Tactical Air Command F-iS f ighters ................................... 1-5A B3-1 B bomber and an F-4 Phantom................................... 1-6Titan solid motor segments being moved by rail........................... 1-9A C-5A aircraft ....................................... .......... 1-10Maintenance on a Naval Reserve F/A-IS8................................ 1-11An10-16 launches an AMRAAM ....................................... 3-1Marines equipped with M- I 6s and M-203 grenade launchers................. 3-2Amphibious assault vehicles......................................... 3-3N12-3 Bradley F ighting Venicle ...................................... 3-6M-60s move along desert tank trails................................... 3-6A B-I113bomber .................................................. 3-8A Navy SE A 1 team ............................................... 5-3An Army depot. ...... ...... .................................... 5-4

iv

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Background

The FY 1983 Department of Defense Authorization Act (Public Law 97-252), which amended the

inspector General Act of 1978 (Public Law 95-452), established arInnspector Generao~or theDepartment of Defense (IG, Dol)). --- -_

Ihis report prepared under the provisions of the Inspector General AcL ummarizes the activities of<E, •q DoD, theliilitaryl~epartments and other I)ol) components with audit, criminal investigationor inspection capabilities.- .... ..

The seven chapters cover the 6-month period ending March 31, 199. In each chapter we identify theefforts that have been made to improve the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of Defense operationsthroujh prevention, detection and correction of fraud, waste and mismanagement. I eeJ +CI ,C-

Chapter 1. Internal Audit

The Army Audit Agency, the Naval Audit Service, the Air Force Audit Agency and the IG, DoD,conduct audits of the internal management of the I)ol). Two military exchange audit groups performinternal audits of the-military exchange systems. Internal review groups in the Army and the DefenseLogistics Agency make reviews for local commanders as well as perform audit liaison, followup and-other staff functions. The audit and internal review reports recommended ways to improve Defenseoperations, enhance readiness and reduce costs by up to $1.7 billion.

Significant Internal Audits

During the reporting period, the auditors placed emphasis on financial management, healthand medical programs, installations and logistics, contract administration and major acquisition.Some examples follow:

Information System--The Ship Repair Facility/Authorization Accounting Activity-Information System did not comply with financial management regulations. The audit identified$22.9 million in potential cost avoidances. (pg. 1-2)

Disability Payments--Recommendations for medical treatment facilities to expedite .heprocessing of medical evaluation results, identify individuals with past due physical examinations,and document and reconcile case records could result in savings of $19.9 million. (pg. 1-2)

Range Operations--if an Army training command in Europe improves its requirementsdetermination process for ranges, construction costs could be reduced by about $1-1.2 million. (pg. 1-4)

Plant Clearance Actions--Excess Government-owned property was not screened throughthe plant clearance reutilization process and unnecessary storage costs were incurred becauseproperty was retained for closed and completed contracts. If corrective actions are taken, nearly $46million in savings could be realized. (pg. 1-8)

Requirement Computations--A review of the accuracy of C-5 aircraft brake and landinggear requirement computations resulted in savings of $10.3 million. (pg. 1-10)

V

Policy and Oversight

The 10, Dol), reviews the operations of DoI) internal audit, internal review and contract auditorganizations to evaluate their implementation of and adherence to prescribed policies and to assureDoI) officials and the public that D)oD audit organizations maintain a high level of competence. Duringthe period, the Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Audit Policy and Oversight completed therevised draft of the I)oi) Internal Audit Manual and distributed it for coordination within the Dol),and revised and issued 1)ol) Directive 7600.2. "Audit Policies." An oversight report was issuedconcerning a followup review of the Naval Audit Service.

Followup

The October 1988 amendments to the IG Act require specific data on the status ofmanagement decisions on IG, Do), reports and on the status of agreed-upon corrective actions. Thosedata are included in this report. The l)oD has formal processes to ensure that decisions are made on alldisputed audit findings and recommendations and to ensure that agreed-upon corrective actions aretaken. Although most agreed-upon corrective actions are carried out in a timely manner by Dol)managers, there are instances of slippage or incomplete action. (pgs. 1-15 to 1-19)

Chapter 2. Contract Audit

The Defense Contract Audit Agency (I)CAA) audits Defense contracts for bothproposed and incurredcontract costs. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers audits contracts for civil works projects in thecontinental United States. The audit reports questioned $7.7 billion.

Significant Contract Audits

Corporate Aircraft Costs--A review was made of a cost-benefits analysis performed by acontractor to justify the reasonableness of aircraft costs charged to Government contracts. Aircraftcosts were not reasonable and the contracting officer negotiated a $4 million reduction in charges.(pg. 2-1)

Warranty Costs--An audit showed that a contractor had erroneously included warranty coststhat were to be provided at no cost to the Government. A $23.2 million contract reduction wasnegotiated. (pg. 2-2)

Purchased Asset Value--A contractor stepped up the value of purchased assets to reflect fairmarket value and charged the additional depreciation, amortization and cost of money to Governmentcontracts. The audit position was sustained and the-Government saved $203 million. (pg. 2-4)

Policy and Oversight

The Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Audit Policy and Oversightissued twocontract audit policies and four oversight reports. Some of the areas examined included access torecords, I)CAA audits of indirect expenses at major contractors, operation audits performed by theI)CAA, the I)CAA management information system and referrals 9f equitable adjustment claims forviolations ofthe False Claims Act. ipgs. 2-6 and 2-7)

vi

Chapter 3. Criminal Investigations

The Defense Criminal Investigative Service (the investigative arm of the IG, DoD), the ArmyCriminal Investigation Command, the Naval Investigative Service Command and the Air Force Officeof Special Investigations investigate criminal conduct or violations of Dol) regulations. The DefenseCriminal Investigative Service investigates procurement fraud and other white collar crime. TheMilitary Departments investigate white collar crime, procurement fraud, homicide, assault, drugtrafficking and other crimes.

Significant Fraud Cases

During the period, investigative emphasis was on defective pricing, product substitution, bidrigging, false claims and false statements, and bribery and kickbacks. Some examples follow:

Flight Data Transmitters--Northrop Corporation submitted false certificates ofcorformance to the Government for flight data transmitters. The corporation agreed to pay fines of$17 million. (pg. 3-6)

Trafficking of Classified I)ocuments--liughes Aircraft Company, Grumman Corporation,Raytheon Company, RCA Corporation and Boeing Corporation pleaded guilty to unlawful conveyanceof DoD classified documents. Civil settlements resulted in over $10 million. (pg. 3-8)

Policy and Oversight

The Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Criminal Investigation Policy and Oversight(OAIG-CIPO) develops Dl)oD criminal investigative policy, oversees its implementation andcoordinates investigative activities. The OAIG-CIPO is also the point of contact and coordinator forvoluntary disclosures made by Defense contractors. To date there have been 191 disclosures resultingin $96.8 million being returned to the Government and 34 prosecutions.

Chapter 4. Other Investigations

The Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Special Programs, comprised of the l)oD I lotlineProgram and a Special Inquiries component, is a unique investigative element which resolvesdisclosures of non-criminal waste, abuse and mismanagement that cannot be effectively addressedthrough other channels.

IG, oD Hotline

The IG, DoD, continues to encourage reporting instances of fraud, waste and mismanagement.Significant findings originating from I lotline contacts included wasteful procurements, stockpiling ofspare parts, computer theft and sexual misconduct.

Special Inquiries

Special Inquiries handles cases referred by Congressional or I)oD officials which often involvesc-nsitive issues. For example:

Abuse of Civilian Position--Recommendations were made for appropriate personnel actionsagainst a civilian official and supervisor, and that the official's suitability for a leadership position inthe military reserve be reviewed. (pg. 4-4)

vii

Chapter 5. Inspections

Management review-type activities of both the IG, Dol), and Military Department inspectionorganizations are covered in this chapter. The traditional military inspector general roles ofevaluating the readiness, morale and discipline of military units are excluded from the data.

Significant Inspections

Commercial Passenger Airlift Operations-- Managementofcommercial passenger airliftoperations is not cost effective. Basic management and fiscal policy problems were found. (pg. 5-1)

Security Research Organizations--The I)ol) had taken many positive actions to correctdeficiencies in security research identified by the Stilwell Commission. The Dol) Security Institute,however, was unable to perform the research functions envisioned in its charter. (pg. 5-2)

Management Support Activities--Inspectors estimated that nearly 200 spaces can beeliminated in the activities without degrading the organization's mission. (pg. 5-2)

Combatting Terrorism--Personnel remain at high risk due to ignorance of programrequirements, flawed implementation of physical security regulation requirements and fragmentedgtidance. (pg. 5-3)

Chapter 6. Legislative Testimony and Proposals

Congressional Testimony

The Inspector General or the Deputy Inspector General testified before the Congress on Navyprocurement practices on automatic data processing equipment, club operations at the Rarnstein Airl3ase, problems in the DoD supply system and lessons learned from the recent procurement fraudinvestigation, "Illwind." (pg. 6-1)

Positions on Proposed Legislation

The IG, DoD, provided data to the Congress concerning proposed legislation to grantadditional investigative authorities and to ensure that Memorandums of Understanding with foreigncontractors are not written to preclude the audit of contractor records by l)oi) auditors. (pg. 6-2)

Recommendations for Congressional Action

The present legislation on access to contractor records by auditors is outdated and needs to berevised for the DCAA to accomplish-its mission in conformance with professional-standards. (pg. 6-2)

The proposed increase in the threshold for submission ofcertified contractor cost and pricingdata should not be approved. It has not been demonstrated that lhe'data catse additional work loadand the-data are an essential safeguard in 25,000 contracts. (pg. 6-3P\

A ppendices

Ap1pendices A through I) meet certain statutory reporting requiremet of the Inspector General Act,as amended, and amplify the material in chapters I through 6.

Viii

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSESIGNIFICANT Au~iT, INSPECTION ANID INVESTIGATION ACCOMPLISHMENTS

(For the 6-month Period Ending March 31,1990)

STATIISTIICAL IIIGHLILiHTrsToasPg

Audit ActivitiesInternal Audit Monetary Benefits:

Potential Monetary Benefits Reported $1,742m 1-1,1.10I mpact of Completed Actions $1 ,844m 1-10,1-15Potential Impact from Open Actions $1 ,4'72m 1-10,1-15

Contract Audit Monetary Benefits:Potential Monetary Benefits Reported $7,671 m 2-3,2-5Impact of Completed Actions $1,443m 2-3,2-6

Investigative Activities:Monetary Outcomes:

Recoveries $101.5m 3-4Fines/Forfeitures $54.6m 3-4Restitutions $9.8m 3-4Civil Settlements/Judgments $81.6m 3-4

Litigation Results:Indictments 865 3-4Convictions 730 3-4Pretrial Diversions/Article 15s 366 3-4Civil Settlements/Judgments 138 3-4

Administrative Results:Debarments-Contractors 458 3-7Suspensions-Contractors 187 3-7

IDoI) H-otlineSubstantive Complaints 1,542 4-2

Ix

financial, operational and support activities-- are

CHAPTER 1 carried out.

An internal review helps a commanding officer

INTERNAL AUDITS detect problem areas and warning indicators,such as the overexpenditure of funds, misuse of

AND INTERNAL resources, and poor control of property, materiel

REVIEWS and supplies. Internal review groups serve astroubleshooters who can make quick reviewswhen problems arise. They also assist in local

An internal audit is a constructive evaluation of command vulnerability assessments, act as auditthe economy, efficiency and effectiveness with liaison when internal audits are made by otherswhich managerial responsibilities--to include and follow up on audits.

Organizational Structure

Do) audit responsibilities are met by 8 internal A list of all IG, I)oi), audit reports and Militaryaudit and internal review organizations: Department audit reports is at appendix C, pages

C-I through C-48.aCentral Audit: The Office of the Assistant

Inspector General for Auditing, DoD, the Army In accordance with the Inspector General ActAudit Agency, the Naval Audit Service and the Amendments, a list of audit reports issued by theAir Force Audit Agency. IG, DoD, with quantifiable potential monetary

benefits is in appendix I).aInternal Review: Organizations within

the Army and the Defense Logistics Agency.Financial Management

a Military Exchange Systems Audit: TheArmy and Air Force Exchange Service Audit Administrative SupportDivision and the Naval Resale and ServicesSupport Office. An audit was conducted in response to a DoI)

iotline complaint alleging waste and-abuse ofOperating Concepts resources atJoint Task Force-Bravo in

Honduras. The auditors found that a centralNo public or private sector audit organization point of contact for vehicle requirements had nothas the complexity, diversity and scope of the been established, vehicles with luxury optionsl)o) audit discipline. Therefore, the work of were leased, vehicle requirements were not fullyDol) internal auditors is subject to very stringent determined, contract purchases were split toprofessional auditing standards. The D)oD avoid compliance with the Federal Acquisitioninternal auditing standards, issued by the IG, Regulation, costs incurred in providing laundryDol), are a compilation of those published by the service to individuals may not be recouped asComptroller General of the United States, the required and assets assigned to the Task ForceAmerican Institute of Certified Public were not fully accounted for. The problems wereAccountants, the Institute for Internal Auditors, attributed to the temporary nature of thethe President's Council on Integrity and organization, the staffing of key positions byEfficiency and the Office of Management and personnel on temporary duty and increases inBudget. thc Tasl FOrce ... k bo,,.

SIGNIFICANT CENTRAL AUDIT'I Management agreed to take corrective actionsACCOMPLISHMENTS and canceled the leases on 28 passenger vehicles,

resulting in annual savings of $213,000.DoD internal audit organizations issued 261 Management also identified 26 leased vehiclescentrally directed reports, identifying $1,515 that will be replaced with Army standardmillion ii, potential monetary benefits. equipment. (OAIG-AUI) 90-048)

1

Information System Finance Center to remove individuals fromtemporary retired status, and overpayments

The Ship Repair Facility/Authorization occurred. If corrective actions are taken aboutAccounting Activity-Information System $19.9 million could be saved.provides internal management information forship repair facilities. The system did not comply The auditors recommended that:with applicable Office of Management andBudget, General Accounting Office, Doi) and o Medical treatment facilities expedite theNavy financial management regulations. This processing of medical evaluation results.resulted in inaccurate financial statements,improper use of funds and possible regulatory ORetirement or separation orders be effectiveviolations. The system was antiquated, did not within 20 days of physical evaluation boardsatisfy user needs and did not comply with results.internal control standards.

ilndividuals with past due physical

The audit identified $22.9 million in potential examinations be identified and rescheduled andcost avoidances. The Command concurred and case files be documented when individuals do notappropriate corrective action was identified, take required e:.aminations.There are several unresolved issues that will beprocessed through the Navy decision process. lThe Finance Center be notified to suspend(NAVAUDSVC 018-W-90) pay when appropriate.

Health and Medical Programs oRecords be periodically reconciled toidentify ineligible individuals receiving

Family Health Care disability pay.

An audit of the Primary Care for Uniformed The Army agreed with the recommendationsServices (PRIMUS) and Navy Care (NAVCARE) and the potential monetary benefits. (AAA I IQprograms found that beneficiaries are pleased 90-200)with the increased access to family health care.The Military Departments, however, lack formal Installations and Logisticsobjectives and goals, program monitoring and amethod of determining outpatient needs. Telecommunications ServicesImprovements in internal controls are needed toensure that the Government receives the level of Defense communications managers did notservice it pays for and that contractors are held adequately revalidate the requirements foraccountable. existing telecommunications services and

continued to pay for services no longer required.The auditors recommended the establishment of Of the sampled circuits reviewed, 21 percentobjectives and goals for PRIMUS and NAVCARE were left in service or were leased although theyprograms and the development of a tracking were no longer required were not cost effectivesystem to monitor the programs' achievements, or could not be identified. As a result, Doi) couldOther-recommendations were made on pay $117.1 million between FY 1989 and FYplacement of future clinics and training of 1993 in unnecessary leased communicationsPRIMUS and NAVCARE officials. Management costs.concurred with the recommendations. (OAIG-AUI) 90-012) Recommendations were made to:

JDisability Payments Establish a policy requiring l)oDComponents to review and revalidaue

Army activities involved in managing physical telecommunications circuits leased and owneddisability cases delayed case processing. by the Defense Communications System (1)CS)Individuals in a temporary retired status did not at least once every 2 years.take required periodic medical examinations ordid not take them promptly and their pay was Designate the World-Wide On-Line Systemnot suspended. The Personnel Command did not (WWOIS) database as the official inventory ofprovide appropriate documentation to the DCS circuits.

0Establish an accurately maintained Management partially concurred with theperpetual circuit inventory, recommendation and nonconcurred with the

amount of potential monetary benefits. The,Verify inventories of circuits at least once issues are being pursued through the audit

every 2 years and reconcile them to the WWOLS resolution process. (OAIG-AU D 90-009)database.

MC-130H CombatTalon 11p Report the absence of review and

revalidation policy as a material internal control Combat Talon II war readiness spares kitsweakness to the Secretary of Defense. (WRSK) were procured based on outdated item

quantities. Of the 27 line items reviewed, 14Reduce the FY 1989 to FY 1993 l)o budget were overstated by about $7.7 million, and I 1

for leased circuits by $117.1 million, were understated by about $4 million. Itemmanagers did not adjust initially determined

Management agreed and instituted a further WRSK quantities to reflect updated quantities.budget.reduction of $21.8 million more thanproposed, resulting in a total savings of $138.9 Auditors recommended that management adjustmillion. (OAIG-AUD 90-005) acquisitions based on the latest requirements

and reprogram funds from overages to identifiedDisposal of Recyclable Materials shortages.

An audit requested by the Chairman, I louse Management agreed with the recommendationsArmed Services Committee, found a substantial and potential monetary benefits of $3.7 million.increase in the proceeus of sales of recyclable (AFAA 9036311)materials made available to installations. At 23 -of the 31 installations reviewed, feasibilitystudies had not been done, and at someinstallations, formal programs had not beenestablished. The l)ol) interim policy guidancehad not been updated since inception of theprogram in 1983.

The auditors recommended that the l)oDestablish formal and comprehensive policyguidance for the recyclable materials program.Management agreed. (OAIG-AUI) 90-008)

Commercial Activities Program

An audit requested by a senior Dol) official foundthat the Defense Logistics Agency (l)lA) had notperformed required commercial activities studiesand had lost, and will continue to lose, the i n

opportunity to achieve up to $61.5 million,during a 5-year period, in reportable first yearcost avoidances. Modified MC-130 Combat Talon aircraft equipped for low-

level and deep-penetration operations. (ol) photo)Auditors recommended that the Director, DLA,issue a commercial activities regulation that Test Facilities at DoD Proving Groundsincludes policies, procedures and detailedguidance for computing the commercial The Secretary of the Army has been assigned theactivities inventory and that permits the responsibility for the management and operationinstallation commanders to prioritize the of the Doi) proving grounds. An audit surveyscheduling and studying of all functions in their showed that the Army is managing thesecommercial activities inventory, facilities well. The Army Materiel Command

1-3

and the Test and Evaluation Command have Range Operationsissued and implemented regulationsestablishing policy and procedures to prevent the An Army training command in Europe shouldunnecessary duplication of test facilities and improve its requirements determination processcapabilities in the Army test centers. No for ranges. Construction costs could be reducedinternal control weaknesses were found and no by about $11.2 million if the commandrecommendations were made. (OA 10-AU D 90- considered the capabilities of existing and028) planned ranges.

ContractTerminations on Excess Supply The auditors recommended canceling one rangeItems and reducing the scope for another. The

command agreed. The official command-replyA summary report was issued on the results of process has not been completed. (AAA EU 90-three recent audits on contract terminations 308)when items on order are excess in the supplysystem. To correct the conditions found in the Commercial Repair of Non-Aviationaudits, the 10, Dol), and the General Accounting MaterialOffice made 17 recommendations. The Servicesagreed to act on all of them. The Navy Ship Parts Control Center (SPCC)

manages Navy material sent ,o comm -cialThe summary report addresses three major facilities for repair. The SPCC indicatd thatconditions identified by the audits. excess on- about $1 billion in items are under repair at 385order assets, uneconomical termination decisions commercial facilities.made by managers at inventory control pointsand failure to reduce the cost consequences of The audit found that the Navy supply anduneconomical termination decisions. financial inventory records of items undergoing

repair were inaccurate and unreliable.The auditors recommended that I)ol) revise, Inaccurate data on Navy rescirces in thesupplement, finalize and issue a draft D)oD possession of commercial facilities could causeInstruction that proposes a policy for termination the Navy to make erroneous or uneconomicaldecisionmaking, as well as procedures to procurements and budgeting decisions.implement the policy. The auditors alsorecommended that Dol) revise and supplement The SPCC agreed with the recommendations butthree Defense guidance documents requiring not with the $17.6 million in claimed monetaryinventory control points to use excess on-order benefits. Unresolved issues were elevated to theassets as Government-furnished material on Chief of Naval Operations for decision.production contracts, when economical. (N AVA U DSVC 027-N-90)Management is taking appropriate action.(OAIG-AUD 90-010) Data Communications

Maintenance Float In April 1982 the DoI) directed that the DefenseData Network (I))N) be implemented I)ol)-wide

Maintenance float requirements of $10.5 million as the common-user data communicationsfor a-light crane were invalid because the crane network. The Naval Telecommunicationsdid-not qualify for maintenance float programs. Command did not develop a project managementPlnat reqtiremPnJs wern genoratod hpcraiise float plan for imp!ement ing the I)N for the Navy.factors from a predecessor crane were used. Responsibilities of the various commands

implementing the I)DN were unclear andArmy auditors recommended that float factors be management controls were not incorporated intodeleted and float requisitions be canceled. The the project. Only 18 percent of the systems werecommand agreed with the recommendations and connected and biennial reviews of leased voicemonetary benefits. The official command reply and data telecommunications circuits were notprocess has not been completed. (AAA E'C 90-7) performeC.

1.4

The auditors identified $3.1 million in potential requirements system. Auditors recommendedmonetary benefits. Management concurred and that inventory specialists validate all additiveagreed to take corrective action. (NAVAUI)SVC requirements in support of CT II.028-S-90)

Management agreed with the recommendationsRecreation Areas and potential monetary benefits of $2.5 million.

(A FAA 4 10-0-06)

The Army Corps of Engineers needed to

implement an effective program to reduce the F- 15 Aircraft Maintenance Requirementsnumber of recreation areas it operates andmaintains. Corps policy did not encourage non- Approved P-15 Programmed Depot MaintenanceFederal public sector and private enterprise to (PI)M) programs were not used to computetake over operation and maintenance requirements and were not adequatelyresponsibilities of existing recreation areas or supported. Estimated PDM condemnationconsolidate little-used areas. The Corps percentages were not supported, factors used tocontinued to manage the areas because non- compute buy requirements were not accurateFederal entities were given limited incentive to and appropriate adjustments were not alwaysassume the responsibility. Transferring the made. Computed buy requirements of $30.9responsibility to non-Federal entities could million and actual acquisitions of $16.6 millionresult in annual potential monetary benefits of were incorrect or not adequately supported.about $110 million.

Management agreed with the audit recom-The auditors recommended accelerating the mendations and $6.6 million of the potentialtransfer of operation and maintenance monetary benefits. The disagreement over theresponsibilities to non-Federal entities by remain.ig monetary benefits is in the formalestablishing goals and monitoring the reduction resolution process. (AFAA 425-0-20)programs. The Command agreed. The officialcommand-reply process has not been completed.(AAA EC90-8)

Defense Courier Service Operations

The I leadquarters Military Airlift Commandrequested a review of the Defense CourierService (I)CS) operations, a joint 1)ol) activitythat moves classified material throughout theworld.

Auditors found that the I)CS network of 39stations was not equipped to support contingencyoperations, manning was inconsistent withworkload, reimbursements were not obtained for Tactical Air Command 1-15 lighters. Air Force photo)

services provided to non-l)ol) users and aninternal control program was needed. Also, Excess Supply Procurementlower cost modes of transportation could be used.

A local manufacturer was used as a source ofManagement agreed with the audit recom- supply when sufficient assets were already onmendations and estimated potential monetary hand or were available more economically andbenefits of $7.6 million. (AFAA 9205214) expediently through commercial sources. The

inventory specialist overstated contractorLogistics Support Management production lead times and selected a local

manufacturer to fill the nonemergencyAn evaluation of the computed equipmcnt requirements.requirements for selected Combat Talon II (CTI) avionics used on C-130 aircraft revealed Management canceled the local manufacturingduplicate requirements because unneeded major work requests totaling $3.1 million. (AFAA 410-command additives remained in the 0-05)

1-5

Training and Testing . ..- ... - -Requirements forF-4 Aircraft

The navigation weaponsdelivery system modifica-tion on Air National GuardF-4E aircraft was installedin July 1989, before quali-fication and operationaltesting was complete.Auditors issued a quick-reaction report because themodification's prematureinstallation could adversely ..

impact the aircraft's ability 'to accomplish its missionInstallation costs of over$1.5 million could be savedif the aircraft were not -. "modified Auditors recom-mended that the installationprogram be delayed until -completion of qualification ,:test and evaluation. - -

Management did not agree. The disagreementwas resolved, however, based on a revisedmodification schedule that assures the modifiedaircraft have the opportunity for about 24minths service and that senior officials assurerisk associated with incomplete software testingis acceptablc. (AFAA 063-9-02)

Hyd rant/Central Aircraft Support Systems

The Centralized Aircraft Support System 3

(CASS), a modern method of providing supportfor service and on-aircraft maintenance for theB-1 B aircraft, did not effectively reducedependence upon mobile flightline supportequipment. Although 75 percent of the CASSservice pits were available 100 percent of thetime, usage was 41 percent. Mobile flightline .-support equipment was dispatched for use over80 percent of the time, but had less than 10percent usage. These conditions occurredbecause procedures for assigning CASS pits werenot developed and there was an excess of mobilesupport equipment.

By maximizing CASS usage, nearly $1.2 millioncould be saved annually. About $3 million couldbe realized by canceling unneeded B-I B supportequipment authorizations and turning in excessmobile flightline support equipment. A B-I3 bonberand art P4 Phantom, inset. (ND) photo)

1-6

Management (lid not agree with the direct material inventory (I)MI) excess to therecommendations and with only $240,000 of the overhaul in time to use it or to expedite recoverypotential monetary benefits. The disagreements of investment, and charged the overhaul $1.3are in the resolution process. (AFAA 213-0-09) million for excess l)MI retained in inventory.

Operating Stocks and Spares Acquisition The Command and NNSY concurred with therecommendations. Resolution is in process

An audit revealed that a Marine Corps logistics relative to $7 million in claimed monetarybase (MCLB) did not validate the accuracy of benefits. (NAVAUI)SVC 089-S-89)data used to compute replacement stockrequirements or perform followup reviews. Contract AdministrationSavings of about $24.1 million could be achieved.

Contracted Advisory and AssistanceAuditors also found that about $5.2 million of Services (CAAS) -- Phase Ilightweight camouflage screening systemequipment was procured in excess of This report is the second of three reports to berequirements and that MCLB did not provide issued by the President's Council on Integritytimely notification of outstanding initial issue and Efficiency task force examining CAAS. Theexpense item receipts to field units. report summarizes the results of audits made

during the last year by 21 Inspectors General.rhe Commandant, Marine Corps, the MCLB, The law requires an annual review be made i nand the Fleet Marine Force, Pacific, did not agree each agency on the progress in establishingwith the recommended actions or monetary effective management controls and actions tobenefits of $29.5 million. The issues will be improve the accuracy and completeness of CAASresolved through the Navy's decision process. data provided to the Federal Procurement Data(NAVAUI)SVC 004-S-90) System.

Engine Maintenance Program The audits showed that all departments andagencies needed improvements in the

A review found that although progress had been management, reporting and oversight of CAAS.made in implementing modular maintenance Problems were identified with theconcepts on the T56 aircraft engine, engine implementation of the Office of Management andmanagers at all levels continued to maintain and Budget Circular A- 120, management controls onmanage the T56 as a whole engine. This resulted CAAS procurements, reporting of CAAS to thein the unnecessary return of whole engines to the Federal Procurement Data System and trainingdepot maintenance activity for repair in lieu of in the identification of CAAS.individual modules. Requirements for enginesand associated modules were misstated and the The summary report made no recommendationsspare engine inventory was understated. since each IG made recommendations in the

individual reports to the respective departmentManagement agreed with the findings but did or agency. (OAIG-AUD Unnumbered)not agree with the recommendations and thepotential monetary benefits of $22.2 million. Competition in Negotiated ProcurementsThe disagreements are in the formal resolutionprocess. (AFAA 410-0-19) An audit showed that the Military Services were

awarding most contracts in accordance withUSS Cincinnati Overhaul current interpretations of the Federal

Acquisition Regulation. Of 69 randomly selectedThe Under Secretary of the Navy requested that contracts, 67 awarded under competitiveauditors monitor the costs and work progress on negotiated procurement procedures resulted inthe overhaul of the USS Cincinnatt. reasonable prices as determined by using

adequate price competition or other safeguards.The audit disclosed that the Norfolk Naval The audit also showed that the internal controlsShipyard (NNSY) defined too little work by for the approval of procurements by supervisorycurrent engineered performance. t1ndards, did contracting officers, commanders and the boardsnot monitor variances between labor hour were adequate to ensure sufficient competitionexpenditures and allowance, did not release (OAIG-AUI) 90-033)

1-7

Interagency Agreements oWitnessing sales and verifying contractorprepared inventory schedules be emphasized.

The DoD program officials did not comply withDefense and Federal Acquisition Regulation Management partially concurred with therequirements on monitoring and controlling recommendations. Disagreements are beinginteragency acquisitions. The program officials pursued through the audit resolution process.bypassed DoD procurement channels by placing (OAIG-AUD 90-043)orders for interagency acquisitions through theLibrary of Congress. The contract awards were Major Acquisitionnot effectively administered. Materialweaknesses increased the risk of contract Incentive Contract Provisionoverpricing and the risk of the procurements tomismanagement, abuse and fraud. A Short Range Attack Missile (SRAM 11)

production contract contained an incentiveThe auditors recommended improvements to the clause which was not in compliance with theDoD internal control practices and procedures. l)oD supplement to the Federal AcquisitionThe auditors also recommended that identified Regulation. The clause did not require thematerial weaknesses be reported and tracked. contractor to exceed contract specifications and it

provided an incentive award for improvementsManagement generally agreed with the in mission reliability from 95 percent to 98recommendations, but has not committed itself percent even though contract specificationsto reporting the problems in this area as material required 98 percent. The program office did notinternal control weaknesses. change or remove the incentive clause when the

contractor proposed a 98 percent missionBecause the material weaknesses identified were reliability. As a result, the contractor couldwidespread throughout-Dol) and involved a receive an additional $10 million-even ifLegislative Branch agency, the auditors believe specifications were not exceeded.they should be included in the Secretary'sannual internal control report to the President Management nonconcurred. The disagreementsand the Congress. (OAIG-AUD 90-034) are in the formal resolution process. (AFAA 305-

0-7)Plant Clearance Actions

Titan IV Component Breakout ProceduresThe audit disclosed that excess Government-owned property was not screened through the The Titan IV program office did not adequatelyplant clearance reutilization process, proceeds assess cost savings that could be realizedfrom contractor conducted sales of Government through component breakout in the follow-onproperty were not verified to receiving buy of 18 expendable launch vehicles or futureGovernment accounts, and unnecessary stora ge procurements. Also, the component breakoutcosts were incurred because property was analysis on the Centaur upper stage componentretained for closed and completed contracts. If did not accurately consider all cost factors orcorrective actions were taken, almost $46 million component breakout benefits.in potential benefits could be realized.

A review of associated costs disclosed savings ofThe auditors recommended that the: about $51.A million for six Centaur units in the

follow-on buy. The difference existed because theoPlant clearance reutilization process be program office did not include all prime

automated. contractor add-on costs that would have anegative impact on the decision to retain a

,Army and Navy require contract prime-subcontractor relationship, and includedadministration activities comply with plant unsupported contractor add-back costs thatclearance procedures. decreased the benefits from breakout.

oPlant clearance officers be provided Management nonconcurred. The disagreementsadequate training to verify that sales proceeds are in the formal resolution process (AFAA 311 -due-the Government are received. 0-03)

1-8

Other Acquisition requirements for the mobile arresting system, anair transportable, self-contained, arresting

Secure Terminal Unit-Ill Program barrier developed to support post-attackoperations in areas of high threat of conventional

The audit found that the program was attack. Requirements for 27 systems valued atineffectively managed and controlled. $5.5 million were not based on valid mission orRequirements were inconsistently developed, -training needs.inadequately supported and inappropriatelycategorized and prioritized. Contractor Auditors recommended that the excesses be usedrequirements were not identified and inadequate to cancel a purchase request for three systems, afunds were budgeted or programmed. There was planned purchase of I 1 similar barriers and ano assurance that all classified and the most fiscal year 1991 budget request for one system.sensitive information related to nationalsecurity was being protected, or that DoD's Management agreed with the recommendationsinvestment was effectively used. The program and potential monetary benefits of $2.2 million.did not comply with Doi) system acquisition (AFAA 9126122)procedures.

Enhanced Modular Signal Processor

The auditors made recommendations to improveprotection of sensitive information during The enhanced modular signal processor (EMSP)transmission, to revise policy to document is the next generation Navy standard tacticalassigned responsibilities, and to establish embedded processor used in submarines, surfaceguidance for identifying, categorizing and ships, aircraft and shore based systems.prioritizing program requirements. Auditors evaluated the adequacy of planning,

management and acquisition practices for theThe Assistant Secretary of Defense (Command, EMSP program.Control, Communications and Intelligence) tookresponsive actions. One recommendation with The program did not meet contract cost, scheduleanother Do) component is not yet resolved, and performance goals. Numerous production(OAIG-AU 1) 90-049) engineering deficiencies existed and test results

showed that hardware and software performanceMobile Aircraft Arresting System deficiencies existed.

Equipment allowance criteria did not. reflect Air The Secretary of the Navy-restructured theForce policies on operation and training EMSP system which resulted in a cost avoidance

.1 - - -

'ant solid notor segments being moved between ic ,tng stations by rail. (A zr lorce photo)

1-9

of about $340 million. The auditors also Mainframe Computersrecommended that the EMS!' program bedesignated as a major defense acquisition An Army audit found that informationsystem. Li March 1989, the Assistant Secretary management plans at a major subordinateof the-Navy f lr Shipbuilding and Logistics, and materiel command did not identify informationthe-Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, requirements and overstated the need forEngineering and Systems, designated the EMSP mainframe computers and associated equipmentas an acquisition category II program. services by about $9.7 million.(NAVAUDSVC 007-C-90)

The auditors recommended deleting unneededRequirement Computations mainframes and equipment from the

information management plan. ManagementA-review of the accuracy of C-5 aircraft brake agreed with the recommendations and potentialand landing gear renuirement computations monetary benefits. (AAA EC 90-1)resulted in a monetary savings of $10.3 million.

OTHER INTERNAL AUDITSUnsupported demand and condemnation ratesfor brake assemblies increased future During the period )ol) internal review,buy/budget requirements because product team installation level and military exchange auditpersonnel replaced historical rates with higher organizations identified over $227 million inestimated rates without documented support. potential monetary benefits.

A recommendation to revise the estimate will Followup action-began on 2,192 DoD internalreduce costs by about $5.6 million over the next review, military exchange audits, installationthree years. The review-also found limited level and nonappropriated fund reports. Actiondocumentation to justify a-requirement for 204 was completed on 2,057 reports, achieving-brake assemblies. During the audit, a estimated monetary benefits of $292 million.-management review team concurred-with thefinding. The $4.7 million requirement was Some examples of compieted significant internalcanceled. (AFAA 504-0-40) reviews and exchange audits follow.

Sewage Plant Contract

A review found that acommand madepayments of almost $2million to a local Waterand Sewage Board overa 15 year period forcharges that wereoutside the contractprovisions or for chargesduring periods in whichthe contract was not inforce. The contract wascanceled in 1986, butservices continued.

The Water and SewageBoard overcharged theinstallation for sewageprocessing at rates about250 percent higher thanthe rates charged tocommercial and

A-C.5A aircraft. (Air Force photo) residential customers.

1-10

There were overcharges because the contracting achieve adequate internal controls and moreofficer accepted billings without verifying the uniform policies and procedues. This-wouldcontractor's billing system. The contractor result in the protection of assets and bettermixed line maintenance costs for its local services to customers.commercial and residential customers with thecosts of operating the plant and charged Store personnel received insufficient training in'uncollected revenues from commercial and operational procedures. Internal expenses wereresidential customers to the-Army as a cost of not considered before distributing profits to localoperating the plant. The command is updating commands, which resulted in excessive profitthe contract and collecting the overcharges, distribution and a reduction of $6 million in(Army) operating capital.

-Warranty Program The Naval Resale activities subsidized Navyclubs and messes by not charging them the true

The administration of the Army Warranty cost of alcoholic beverages and sodas. If they hadProgram needed improvement. The command been assessed the service charge, the profitsdid not coordinate the establishment of work would have increased by over $850,000. (Navy)programs for the depot to induct and repairwarranted repaables. The present system left Procurement Reviewthe warranted assets waiting induction in thesame condition code as all the reparables waiting Debarred, ineligible and suspended contractorsinduction. Warranty claims to reimburse the on an activity's contractor review list did notArmy for repair costs were not filed and eliminate the vendors from receiving contractwarranted assets were not easily tracked and awards. Six awards were prepared for threeidentified, vendors who were on the list.

The auditors estimated that potential monetary Auditors recommended that an internal controlbenefits of $3.2 million could be realized. (Army) be developed and implemented to assure that

awards are not made to debarred, ineligible and-Food Services suspended contractors. Management agreed and

took corrective action. (DLA)Negotiations for a fiscal year 1990 food servicecontract resulted in overstated cost or pricingdata. The command overstated the independentGovernment estimate, modified the bid schedulemaking it difficult to compare pricing with thelast contract and failed to make a technicalreview of the contractor's final proposal prior toacceptance.

The command renegotiated the contract,reducing the annual cost by $658,000. (Army)

F/A-18 Aircraft

Intermediate maintenance activities wereeffectively meeting the needs of F/A-18 aircraftmaintenance requirements and associatedsupply support. In addition, actions taken onprevious audit reports should ensure that uniquesupport equipment and associated avionics areavailable and effectively used. (Navy)

Package Store Operations

Package store operations needed to be fullyassimilated into the Navy Resale System to Magntetncenon a NaalRee,'tpeb'fVA 18(Navyphoto)

1-11

Warehousing Support audit results. The potential monetary benefitsattributable to NAS audits had increased

An audit was made of warehousing support dramatically as audit resources wereprovided by the Giessen Distribution Center to concentrated in higher payback areas.Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES)facilities in Europe. An oversight review was also conducted at the

Naval Resale and Services Support Office basedThe audit found: on a Ilotline allegation that management had

tried to suppress an internal audit report onPCyclical inventory counts would improve advertising programs. No evidence was found to

the accuracy of warehouse balance files, support the allegation.

0Improved controls over merchandise Other oversight projects initiated includeshipments would strengthen accountability, reviews of: the effect on audit coverage of Navy

programs resulting from the disestablishment oflmproved controls of refunds on expired the Navy Internal Review Program, the use of

coupons for fuels would prevent losses, microcomputers by DoD audit organizations andquality assurance programs in the Army Audit

Emphasis on clearance of aged purchases- Agency.in-transit-would prevent losses. (AAIPES)

GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICEAUDIT POIICY AND OVERSIGHT REPORT ANALYSIS AND

FOLLOWU PThe Assistant Inspector General for Audit Policyand Oversight provides policy for and oversight The IG, I)oD, performs the central liaisonof the internal audit, internal review, services for the l)oD with the GAO. The servicesnonappropriated fund audit and external audit include staffing GAO announcements, resolvingactivities within the I)oD. The organization is access to records problems, informing theconcerned with the quality and effectiveness of Secretary of Defense and other top DoDDoI) audit organizations and their adherence to managers of GAO activity and ensuring prompt,prescribed audit standards, policies and explicit agency replies to GAO findings andprocedures. recommendations.

During the period a revised draft of the I)ol) The IG, Dol), processed 203 GAOInternal Audit Manual was completed and announcements and 304 draft or final reportsdistributed for coordination within the Dol). A during the period. In addition to staffing GAOrevised version of DoD Directive 7600.2, "Audit announcements and reports, the IG, DoI), tracksPolicies," was issued on January 26,1990. Some the status of agreed-upon DoD actions inof the major changes relate to clarifying the response to GAO reports. The DoD componentsauditors' responsibility for evaluating and reported the completion of action on 121reporting on-the internal control programs, recommendations. Action on 248 agreed-uponproviding information on the provisions of Title recommendations, with estimated monetary18 U.S.C. with respect to impeding Federal benefits of $36 million, was in progress as ofauditors in the performance of their duties and March 31, 1990.providing guidance on issuing iG subpoenas.

'!'he Inspector General Act requires that the IG,The following oversight report was issued. Dol), avoid duplication with the GAO.

Considerable effort is made by the GAO and thep Followup Review of the Naval Audit 1)ol) audit staffs to avoid unnecessary

Service (APO 90.002). A comprehensive duplication. To this and, the Congress is urgedfollowup on prior reports issued by the IG, Dol), not fa request GAO reviews that, would overlapand the General Accounting Office disclosed that planned or ongoing audits by I)ol) internalthe Naval Audit Service (NAS) had made auditors, The IG, Dl)o, also recommends thatsignificant strides in implementing requestors of GAO reviews allow the GAO torecommendations made during those reviews provide draft reports Wu the DoD for comment.and in improving overall audit effectiveness. That step is a normal and useful part of the auditImprovements were noted in audit independence, process and ensures better accuracy in theplanning, supervision and documentation of information provided to the Congress.

1,12

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSEMANAGEMENT AUDITFO LLO WU P STATU S REPORT Dol) policy requires the tracking of every agreed-(internal Audit) upon action until its completion has been

documented. Summary results are in exhibit 2,This section complies with the requirement in page I -15. The figures in the exhibit reflect onlythe Inspector General Act Amendments of 1988 agreed-upon, documentable monetary benefits.for a report on the status of audit followupefforts. The IG, Dol), cautions that quantifiable

monetary benefits achieved through internalThe IG, DoD, and the Military Departments audits are but a partial measure of the auditoperate systems to ensure that an authoritative program's impact. The majority of internal auditdecision is made on what will be done in response reports yield benefits that are not readilyto each audit finding and recommendation. The quantifiable, such as improved safety, internalresults of the process are in exhibits Ia below and controls, compliance with laws and regulations,Ib, page 1-14. readiness, and organization.

EXHIBIT laDECISION STATUS OF

INSPECTOR GENERAL ISSUED REPORTSWITH QUESTIONED COSTS

Dollar Value(in thousands)

Number

QuestionedCosts 2!

A. For which no management decisionhad been made by the beginning 0 $0of the reporting period

B. Which were issued during thereporting period 9 4,676

Subtotals (A + B) 9 4,676

C. For which a management decisionwas made during the reporting period 6 4,006

(i) dollar value of disjullowed costs 4,006

(ii) dollar value of costs not disallowed 0

D. For which no management decisionhas been made by the end of thereporting period 3 670

Reports for which no managementdecision was made within six months 0 0of issuance ,

11 The Military Departients also report no undecided internal audit i eports over six months old.z' None ofthese questioned costs involve unsupported ioSts.

1-13

EXHIBIT IbDECISION STATUS OF

INSPECTOR GENERAL ISSUED REPORTSWIrH RECOM M ENI)ATIONS THAT FUNDS BE PUT TO BEVrIER USE

Dollar Value

(in thousands)Number

Funds Put toBetter Use

A. For which no management decision had been madeby the beginning of the reporting period 33 $649,267

B. Which were issued during the reporting period 46 264,412

Subtotals (A + B) 79 913,679

C. For which a managementdecision was madeduring the reporting period 53 745,824

(i) dollar value of recommendations that were

agreed to by management 257,424 1/

- based on proposed management action 257,424 1/

- based on proposed legislative action 0

(ii) dollar value of recommendations that were notagreed to by management 488,400 /

-D. For which no management decision has been madeby the end of the reporting period 26 167,855

Reports for which tio management decision wasmade within six months of issuance 2 35,020 2/

11On certain reports with audit estimated monetary benefits of $118.6 million, it has beenagreed that the resulting monetary benefits can only b(. estimated after completion ofmanagement action, which is ongoing.2/ IG-AU 1) Reports 89-105, "Contractor Qualification Process for Blade Bushings for the C-130 Aircraft," and 89-108, "Component Breakout of the I larpoon Weapon System," wereundecided within six months of issuance. The military departments reported sevenadditional audits which were undecided within six months of issuance.

1-14

EXHI BIT 2STATUS OF ACTION ON CENTRAL INTERNAL AUDITS

Monetary Benefits($ in thousands)

Status of Action Numberof Reports Questioned Funds Put to

Costs I/ Better Use

IG-DoDAction in Progress - Beginning of Period 207 $43,176 $752,981Action Decided - During Period 59 4,006 257,424Action Completed - During Period 65 306 406,126Action in Progress - End of Period 201 43,732 76.4,819

Military DepartmentsAction in Progress- Beginning of Period 551 --- 948,361Action Decided - During Period 209 --- 825,319Action Completed - During Period 209 --- 1,146,017Action in Progress- End of Period 551 --- 410,960

I/ None ofthe questioned costs involve unsupported costs.

)ISPUTED IG REPORTS SIGNIFICANT INCOMPLETECORRECTIVE ACTIONS

Two i1, DoD, audit reports involving undecidedissues were-ovet six months old at the end of the DoD managers devote considerable time andperiod, as follows: resources to implementing IG, I)oD, and GAO

recommendations. I1 undreds of agreed-uponAuditors recommended that the Air Force corrective actions are carried out in a timely

reverse engineer a blade bushing for C-130 manner, but instances of slippage or incompleteaircraft so that the part could be procured implementation do occur. For example:competitively instead of on a sole source basis.The Air Force disagreed with the audit estimate nAdministration of Government-of the cost and risk of reverse engineering the Furnished Property(GFP). Since 1971, Do)item. The Deputy Secretary of Defense decided and the Services have made little progress inthe matter in April 1990 in favor of the Air reducing the amountof equipment furnished toForce. (OAIG-AUD 89-105) contractors and efforts to improve controls have

lagged. The Deputy Secretary of Defense haso An audit indicated that the Navy could approved the development of an accounting

save as much as $34.6 nillion by breaking out module for GFP which would be implementedvarious components of the Harpoon missile for I)ol)-wide. A study group was formed to developcompetition. Subsequently, the program was a module implementing financial controls overrestructured. Navy studies showed, however, GFP by FY 1992. (GAO FGMS!)-80-57)that costs could still be reduced by between $5 (Previously reported.)and $10 million-if a breakout strategy waspursued. Nevertheless, Navy managers An IG, Dol), review found that contractors atdisagreed that any breakout would be cost Government-owned contractor-operated plantseffective. The IG, l)o[), has reminded the were inappropriately awarded fees forSecretary of the Navy that previous acquisition of Government facilities (vehicles,opportunities for component breakout in this computers and furniture). Management hadprogram were missed and has asked for agreed to revise the Federal Acquisitionreconsideration. (OAIG-AUI) 89-108) Regulation to prohibit the payment of any fee or

1-15

profit on contracts involving facilities The Army and Navy have also been slow toacquisition, but was slow in implementing the establish internal controls to ensure effectivechange. The Defense Acquisition Regulation item identification. (GAO NSIAD-88-121)case implementing the recommendation hasbeen submitted to the Civilian Agency @Navy Contract'Terminations. A 1988Acquisition Council for review, approval and audit found that the Navy Aviation Supplypublication. 'The Services have issued interim Office item managers and contracting officersinstructions directing their buying activities to made uneconomical termination decisions ondisallow payments of a profit or fee for the contracts for items no longer needed becauseacquisition of Government facilities. (OAIG- they did not have specific guidelines orAUD 87-140) (Previously reported.) procedures. The Navy agreed and stated that the

Contract Termination Model currently underAn IG, Dol), audit reported that controls were development by the Navy Supply Systeminadequate for administering Government- Command would be used by Navy contractingowned other plant equipment held by officers as their guide to accomplish andWashington area contractors doing business document economic analyses leading to cost-with Dol). Management agreed to strengthen effective termination decisions for excess-on-internal control procedures by providing detailed order spares. The model was to be available byguidance for testing contractor property systems September 1988, but slipped to January 1990.designed to control, protect, preserve and Complete implementation is still pending.maintain Government property. Action to issue (OAIG-AU 1)88-153)the agreed-upon guidance as part of the new DoDManual, "Performance of Contract Property a Automatic Test Equipment (ATE). SinceAdministration," has been delayed. Also, 1983, the Navy has been revising its regulationslanguage must be included in the Defense on the management of ATE to ensure thatFederal Acquisition Regulation Supplement and responsibiliti -!s are clearly defined andDo) Directive 4275.5 to authorize publication, managers are authorized to redistribute ATEThe earliest possible date for publication is mid- when appropriate. The revision has not beenDecember 1990. (OAIG-AUI) 88-143) accomplished and controls remain inadequate.

(OAIG-AUI) 84-002) (Previously reported.)s Hand and Power Tool Accountability.

Efforts to revise I)ol) 7200.10-M, "Accounting e Use of Technical Data in Competitiveand Reporting for Government Property Lost, Procurement. The Dol) has not implementedDamaged or Destroyed," have been ongoing since actions to ensure adequate receipt and use of1984. The agreed-upon revisions respond to an technical data to improve competition. A 1983audit finding that cost of tools lost or damaged audit found data were often insufficient todue to user negligence were not being recouped. support competition and recommended that DoDEfforts are underway to complete the final guidance be improved. The guidance, originallyreview and publication. (OAIG-AUI) 84-061) scheduled for publication in 1984, was issued in(Previously reported.) January 1989. It was intended to help DoD

activities identify and acquire technical datas Federal Catalog System (FCS). 'The FCS they are entitled to and aid in the effective use of

continues to experience item identification the data. Action on the publication of Serviceproblems. Each Service and )LA have implementing documents has halted while theautomation initiatives underway to correct l)oD considers canceling the newly publishedlongstanding deficiencies in cataloging supply Directive and reissuing it in another form as partitems. Many of the initiatives are long range in of the regulation streamlining process. (OAIG-nature. The Services and I)IA were directed to AUI) 83-098) (Previously reported.)prioritize their cataloging efforts to increase theutilization of full item descriptions. I lowever, ,Contract Advisory and Assistancethey are still using (to varying degrees) the less Service (CAAS). The Army has not issuedeffective reference method to catalog items. guidance to implement the DoI) CAAS Directive,Action is underway to replace the Federal Item Dol)D 4205.2, which has been in effect sinceIdentification Guides with Logistics Name January 26, 1986. The Navy and Air Force haveDescription Guides (LNDG). To date there are also delayed implementation of new CAASonly seven LNI)G implemented or in process. employee training on CAAS definition and

1-16

reporting requirements, citing the planned contracts exceeding $1 million, and to permitrevisions to OMB Circular A-120 and DoDD contract price adjustments when a contractor4205.2 as reasons for postponement.(OAIG-AUID representation of commerciality is invalid. In88-184) January 1987, the Assistant Secretary of

Defense (Production and Logistics), agreed to theeIDuplicative Research. Delays and revision. The action is still ongoing. (OAIG-

curtailments have occurred in implementing AUI) 87-210) (Previously reported.)corrective actions on inadequate input to and useof the Defense Technical Information Center lAir Force Special Stock Items. Sincedata base, resulting in increased potential for 1986, the Air Force has tried to resolveduplicative research work. In 1985, the problem communication interface problems between twowas brought to the attention of the Director, supply systems to enable automaticDefense Research and Engineering. The determination of special stock itemproblem continues. The IG, I)oD, recommended requirements, and reconciliation of normal andthat stronger measures be taken to force proper adjusted special stoLk levels at bases with Airuse of the data base, or the program be Logistics Center records. Appropriate dataterminated. The Director, Defense Research and exists in both systems, but they cannot interfaceEngineering, the Services and the Defense due to data transmission difficulties. TheLogistics Agency initiated actions to correct the systems are to be made operational through Airproblem. They need to be implemented Force-wide installation of the I lost Messageeffectively and in a timely manner. (OAIG-AU D Processing Systems in FY 1993. The delay85-116; OAIG-INS 86-003 and 89-004) inhibits the annual reconciliation of base stock(Previously reported.) levels with Air Logistics Center records. (GAO

NSIAD-87-34)e In-house Laboratory Independent

Research (ILIR) Program. Delays have s lntransit Shipments. In December 1984,occurred in DoD actions, initiated in 1987, to a proposed change to the Military Standardissue a Dol) instruction to clarify guidance and Transaction and Accounting Procedures wasstrengthen controls over the ILIR program. An sent to the DoD Components for comment. TheIG, D)oD, audit found that the Services were change and its joint Military Standardusing program funds for projects that did not Requisitioning and Issue Procedures haveconform to program goals. After several delays undergone review, but have not been issued. Asand unsuccessful attempts to obtain coordination a result, the Doi) lacks detailed automatedon draft instructions, the Office of the Director, procedures to increase the visibility of intransitDefense Research and Engineering, is now shipments. (OAIG-AUI) 85-050)reevaluating the need for the document due tothe emphasis on streamlining regulations. a Payments on Government Bills of(OAIG-AUD 87-087) Lading (GBL). A 1987 audit recommended that

Military Service AI)P systems be established toaCatalog Pricing Exemption Claims. detect duplicate billings before payments are

Contractors may obtain exemptions from made. The Army and the Marine Corps havesubmitting certified cost or pricing data if their developed and installed systems. The Navy hasproposed prices are based on established catalog been unable to develop a system because ofor market prices of commercial items sold in continuing problems with the Navy Materialsubstantial quantities to the general public. A Transportation Office Operations and1987 audit found that one outof three approved Management Information System. 'Theexemptions did not meet the exemption criteria. Comptroller, DoD, requested that the NavyContracting officers accepted contractor develop an economic analysis of transferring theexemption claims without adequate verification. Navy GBL paying and z elated effur to Lu theOnce the exemption is granted, the Federal Army. (OAIG-AUI) 87-141) (PreviouslyAcquisition Regulation (FAR) does not provide reported.)contracting officers with remedies to adjustprices and recoup the amount of any resulting * Excess Disability Payments. In 1985 theoverpricing. The IG, DoD, recommended Army agreed to provide quarterly pay data to therevision to the FAR to require verification of Department of Veterans Affairs to reduce excesscontractor catalog pricing exemption claims for disability payments through computer

1-17

matching. Followup showed that the provision of since 1973, although legislation has imposeddata stopped in 1987. It has resumed, but will new requirements. Ineffective hazardous wastenot be fully automated until early 1991. (GAO management and pollution control have becomeH RD-85-38) major concerns. The 10, DoD, and the GAO have

identified the need for revised environmentalaSpecial Defense Acquisition Fund guidance. A revised DoD directive was drafted to

(Sl)AF). Since 1987, the Air Force has incorporate such guidance, but the expectedexperienced delays in establishing procedures to publication date has been slipping since 1986.charge military and unfunded civilian (GAO C-NSIAD-86-24; GAO NSIAD-84-5;retirement costs to purchases made from the OAIG-INS 86-013) (Previously reported.)SDAF. Interim guidance has been published.(OAIG-AU ) 87-236) (Previously reported.) a Hazardous Materials Storage. A 1983

audit fou" poor DoD storage guidance. The lack'Unaccompanied Personnel Housing. A offamili ty with acceptable storage practices

1982 audit found a lack of compliance with and inadequate storage facilities at somecongressional direction on the quality of officer installations created dangers of explosion, fireand enlisted unaccompanied housing. Congress and release of contamination. Action wasdirected the DoD to establish policies on the use initiated to }ssue a new I)o) manual on theof such housing by civilians, including adequacy storage and handling of hazardous and toxicstandards, reservation systems and exchange materials, which would include procedures forprivileges. The Marine Corps has issued the cleanup of spills and precautions for outsideimplementing instructions. The Army, Navy, storage. The manual would also establishAir Force and Defense Agencies planned to issue standard codes for classifying hazards andinstructions by September 1989, but have not. matching them to the proper safetyThe Dol) has directed that their efforts be requirements. Although staffing of the manualaccelerated. (OAIG-AUI) 82-029) was completed, publication has been held in

abeyance due to regulation streamlining studies.s Dol) Passenger Airlift Improvements in (OAIG-AU1) 83-137) (Previously reported.)

DoD passenger airlift have been made since a1987 GAO report recommended changes to airlift a Disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenylsprocurement, management controls and (PCB). The Dol) has tried to find a disposalsecurity. A 1988 IG, DoD, inspection showed alternative for PCB contaminated items storedproblems with management granting seat in Japan. Japan has no facilities for PCBspacing requirements waivers. A study on seat disposal and the Environmental Protectionspacing is being evaluated. Other corrective Agency (EPA) does not allow the return ofactions remain incomplete, including foreign-made PCB to the U.S. In June 1988, theimprovement of the passenger comment process DoD banned further procurement of such itemsand determination of appropriate functions and overseas. There is a backlog of over 200 tons ofstaffing levels of the Air Carrier Survey and equipment awaiting disposal and most of theAnalysis Office. (GAO NSIAD-87-67) items have been on hand for over 10 years. The(Previously reported.) DoD requested that EPA permit shipment back

to the U.S., but it was disapproved in May 1989.sOperational Support Airlift (OSA). The The Dol) continues to investigate alternatives,

development of a wartime requirement for OSA including disposal outside the U.S. or submissionand the quantification of the number, mix and of another request to the EPA. (GAO NSIAI)-86-type of OSA aircraft needed to support that 24) (Previously reported.)requirement, originally scheduled for completionin March 1986, has slipped four years. A oContinuity of Operations Plan (COOP)definition of OSA has yet to be produced. (OAIG- A 1987 audit recommended preparation of riskAUI) 85-089) (Previously reported.) assessments and a COOP* for the data processing

installation at the Pearl I larbor Naval Shipyard.m Requirement to Update Environmental An IG, Dol), inspection in November 1989 found

Protection Policy. The )oI)-wide policy on that a test of the COOP had not been conducted.environmental protection has not been updated (OAIG-AUI) 87-065)

~1-18

@Management of Controlled Substances. In response to the Inspector General ActThe Army has not published guidance to address amendments of 1988, a listing of IG, D)oD, auditdeficiencies in medical facility management of reports on which action has been ongoing for Icontrolled substances. In April 1988, the DoD year or more after managers agreed to takereemphasized the need for more effective action is at exhibit 3, pages 1-20 through 1-23.policies. The Army planned to take correctiveaction by revising a pharmacy management .FOLLOWUI1 SYSTEM REVIEWSregulation, but the effort has been delayed.Publication of the regulation is now targeted for An oversight review of the Navy internal auditMay 1990. (OAIG-AUD 88-050) followup system by the IG, Dol), indicated that

the Navy has taken vigorous, effective action toaVehicle Requirements. Since 1984, correct previously identified problems in its

requirements for ammunition resupply vehicles audit followup operations. The IG, l)o),have been uncertain. The Army initiated actions commended the Navy for the progress and for theto develop ammunition planning factor rates responsiveness of Navy followup officials towhich would serve as the basis for recomputation various additional recommendations made byof vehicle requirements. Changes in approved the review team. The Inspector General andrequirements await the results of ongoing Auditor General of the Navy have beenstudies. (OAIG-AUI) 84-074) (Previously especially strong proponents of improved Navyreported.) followup effort.

1-19

EXHIBIT3STATUS OF IG, Doi), REPORTS OVER 12 MONTHS OLD WITH FINAL ACTION PENDING

(As of March 31,1990)

Monetary Benefits

Report Report ($ in thousands) Reason PrimaryNumber Date Action Not Action Office

Questioned Funds Put to CompletedCosts Better Use

81-055 2/25/81 2 P& L82-029 11/10/81 2 P&l,83-098 4/11/83 2 P&L483-137 6/3/83 2 P&I,84-002 10/25/83 2 Navy84-058 3/26/84 2 Army84-061 4/20/84 2 COMPT84-074 4/18/84 2 Army84-117 8/15/84 2 COMPT84-139 9/28/84 2 FM&P,Air Force85-050 11/14/84 2 IP&L85-056 12/24/84 2 P&L85-089 4/19/85 2 PA&E85-092 5/3/85 2 P&L85-099 6/27/85 2 Army85-104 7/26/85 2 Air Force85-108 8/16/85 2 IIh85-111 8/30/85 $1,189 2 Army85-1 16 9/18/85 2 DDR&E85-802 8116/85 2 P&I,86-002 10/9/85 2 Army86-003 10/11/85 2 PA86-042 11/18/85 2 I)A86-056 1/23/86 2 PA&E86-060 1/31/86 $40 3 Air Force86-061 1/31/86 2 DLA86-067 2/18/86 2 P&L4

86-075 2/28/86 $202 3 Air Force86-076 2128186 $165 3 Air Force86-077 2/28/86 $137 3 Air Force86-078 2/28/86 $28 3 Air Force86-079 2/28/86 $133 3 Air Force86-111 7/23/86 2 P&I.86-131 8/28/86 1 Army,Navy87-027 i 10/24/86 2 P&I,87-028 i,!-7186 2 Army87-059 12/17/86 2 Navy87-065 1/6/87 2 Navy87-087 2/17/87 2 D))R&E87-109 4/2/87 2 USI(A)

Reason Action Aot CompletedI. Long-term corrective action on schedule.2. Management action slipped significantly from originally estimated completion date.3. Formal administrative or judicial appeal.

1-20

Monetary Benefits($ in thousanls) Reason PrimaryReport Report Action Not Prmy

Number Date Action OfficeQuestioned Funds Put to Completed

Costs Better Use

87-117 4/7/87 $242 2 Air Force87-124 4/9/87 2 USD(P)87-140 5/6/87 2 P& 487-141 5/7/87 2 Navy87-145 5/12/87 1 P&L87-153 5/21/87 $31 2 I)CAA87-157 5/22/87 2 P&L87-169 6/18/87 $85 3 Navy87-172 6/18/87 $30 2 Army87-175 6/19/87 2 I)NA87-177 6/19/87 2 Navy87-190 7/13/87 1 DDR&E87-197 7/24/87 2 P&L87-199 7/29/87 $25 2 Air Force37-205 7/29/87 $2,885 2 Air Force87-208 7/31/87 2 COMPT87-210 7/31/87 2 P&l,87-211 7/31/87 2 LA87-212 7/31/87 2 P&L87-220 8/14/87 2 Navy87-222 8/18/87 $854 3 Army87-223 8/20/87 2 I)LA87-226 8/26/87 1 Air Force87-227 8/31/87 2 )MA87-230 9/2/87 2 Navy87-231 9/4/87 $91 2 Air Force87-236 9/15/87 2 Air Force88-025 10/13/87 2 DDR&E88-038 10/20/87 $715 2 Navy88-041 10/22/87 $100 2 Army88-045 11/4/87 2 Army88-047 11/6/87 2 Army88-050 11/23/87 2 Army88-053 11/30/87 2 Army,Navy,AF88-056 12/4/87 1 COMPT88-057 12/8/87 $1,114 2 Army88-067 1/6/88 $20,000 2 FM&P,DLA88-069 1/12/88 2 )LA88-071 1/19/88 2 Air Force88-079 1/27/88 3 j I)LA

Reason Action Not Completed:1. Long-term corrective action on schedule.2. Management action slipped significantly from originally estimated completion date.3. Formal administrative or judicial appeal.

1-21

Monetary BenefitsI$ in thousands) Reason

Report Report Aon PrimaryNumber Date Action Not Action Office

Questioned Funds Put to CompletedCosts Better Use

88-080 2/1/88 2 USD(P)88-083 2/4/88 $5,356 2 Army88-087 2/16/88 $7,375 2 Air Force88-089 2/26/88 $244 3 Army88-092 3/1/88 1 I)LA88-098 3/9/88 $321 3 Army88-103 3/15/88 2 DlLA88-106 3/18/88 $658 2 Army88-109 3/21/88 2 USD(A)88-112 3/22/88 2 USD(A),Army88-114 3/30/88 $10,500 3 Army88-115 3/30/88 $71,200 2 DLA88-118 4/1/88 2 P&I,88-121 4/5/88 2 DMA88-122 4/5/88 2 USD(P)88-124 4/6/88 $3,239 3 Army88-126 4/7/88 2 USD (A)88-131 4/13/88 $9,000 2 ISA88-137 4/19/88 2 )LA88-138 4/21/88 $287 2 Army88-140 4/27/88 2 P&L88-141 4/29/88 $24,600 2 Army88-143 5/6/88 2 13&1,,Navy,I) 4 A88-144 5/9/88 1 Navy88-145 5/9/88 $86 2 DIlA88-148 6/20/88 2 P&L88-151 6/1/88 2 Army88-153 5/23/88 $34,600 I Navy88-156 5/25/88 2 FM&P88-157 5/26/88 2 Army88-158 5/31/88 2 DMA88-159 5/27/88 1 P&L,Army88-164 6/13/88 2 I)CA88-168 6/13/88 2 l)CA88-171 6/16/88 1 Air Force88-177 7/8/88 2 Army88-178 7/8/88 $1,908 2 Army, AF88-179 7/8/88 2 Army, Navy, AF

Reason Action Not CompleteT. .1. Long-term corrective action on schedule.2. Management action slipped significantly from originally estimated completion date.3. Formal administrative or judicial appeal.

1-22

Monetary Benefits($ in thousands) Reason

Report Report Action Not PrimaryNumber Date Action OfficeQuestioned Funds Put to Completed

Costs Better Use

88-184 7/22/88 2 Army Navy, AF88-185 7/25/88 1 P&L88-186 7/28/88 $1,235 2 DLIA88-188 8/5/88 2 PACOM88-189 8/5/88 $3,342 $677 3 Army,Navy,

AF, I)LA88-190 8/8/88 2 Army,Navy88-195 8/22/88 2 P&L88-198 9/2/88 1 Air Force88-200 9/13/88 2 USI(A)88-201 9/13/88 1 l)I)R&E, AF"88-206 9/27/88 2 Navy

teason Action Not Completed:1. Long-term corrective action on schedule.2. Management action slipped significantly from originally estimated completion date.3. Formal administrative orjudicial appeal.

Acronyms:COMPT-Comptroller !1A -Health AllairsDCA - Defense Communications Agency ISA - Installation Support AgencyI)D)R&E. Dir. D)ef. Research & Engineering PA -Public AfliarsDLA -Defense Logistics Agency PACOM -Pacific CommandI)MA - Defense Mapping Agency PA&E. Program Analysis and EvaluationDNA- Defense Nuclear Agency P&L -Production and LogisticsEUCOM -European Command USDA)- Under Secretary of lDef. for Acquisitionl.M&P -Force Management and Personnel USI)DP) -Under Secretary of Def. ibr Policy

1-23

CHAPTER 2

CONTRACT AUDITS

The 1G, l)ol), formulates contract audit policy, I)CAA offers contract audit services on aprovides oversight and coordinates l)oD contract reimbursable basis to other Governmentaudit followup efforts. agencies at contractor locations where the I)ol)

has a continuing audit interest, or where it isThe Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) more economical from a Governmentwide stand-was established as a separate agency in the I)ol) point. Over 90 percent of I)CAA audit work isto offer independent contract audit and financial done, however, for the Dol).advisory services to DoD components. It operatesunder the general direction and control of the The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers audits civilComptroller, Department of Defense. works contracts.

ACCESS TO CONTRACTO RRECORDS The contractor classified capital equipment

items as indirect material and supplies. TheThis is the fourth consecutive Semiannual Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requiresReport to the Congress in which we have pointed the contractor to capitalize the equipment andout a need for legislation to provide contract amortize the cost over the life of the asset. Theauditors with the authority to obtain records audit also found that the contractor claimedrequired to comply with Government Auditing selling costs incurred in connection with foreignStandards issued by the Comptroller General. military sales, which is not allowable under theThe existing legislation has several FAR. During negotiations, the contractingshortcomings that are addressed more fully in officer sustained the auditor's recommendedChapter 6, page 6-2. reductions.

DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT Corporate Aircraft CostsAGENCY

A review was made of a cost-benefits analysisAudit Results performed by a contractor to justify the

reasonableness of aircraft costs charged toThe results of I)CAA auditing for the Federal Government contracts. The contractor's analysisGovernment are shown in exhibits 4 and 5, considered aircraft performance records,page 2-3. availability of scheduled commercial airline

service and cost related to time savings of keySignificant I)CAA Audits personnel. The audit found that the contractor

overstated the time saved by key employees byIncurred Cost Audits - A review of the using corporate aircraft instead of commercialdirect and indirect costs charged to Government airlines. As a result, the audit concluded thatcontracts, and Government policies and aircraft costs were not reasonable.procedures that influence and control such costs.

In addition, some aircraft costs were moreCapital iquipment identifiable to commercial products and not

chargeable to Government contracts. TheA review of a contractor's incurred cost contracting officer negotiated a $4 millionsubmission resulted in savings of $4.1 million, reduction in corporate aircraft charges.

2-1

Billing System contractor did not consider prior purchases ofmaterial or quantity discount breaks. The direct

An audit found that a contractor had not id- labor hours were not supported by recentjusted its progress payment billing system to historical data on similar contracted effort andaccount for the difference between estimated the proposed labor hours included effort thatcorporate office expense and the amount actually should have been classified as indirect.incurred for the year. In such a case, thecontractor is required to adjust billings to actual Warranty Costscosts and to credit the Government for interestrealized on the over billings. Based on the audit An audit showed that a contractor hadrecommendation, the contractor reimbursed the erroneously included warranty costs that were toGovernment $258,000. be provided at no cost to the Government. The

direct labor hours were also not supported byIndirect Costs historical data on similar contracted effort. The

auditor and the Government technicalA review of a contractor's allocation of indirect representative determined that the contractor'scosts between commercial and Government seg- labor requirements and escalation factors werements resulted in savings of $62.3 million. The unreasonable. Based on the audit, thedistribution of indirect costs was not proportion- contracting officer negotiated a $23.2 millional to the benefits received on contracts or related reduced contract price.to the cause of incurring the costs. The nonhomo-geneous cost pools increased Government con - Defective Pricing Audits - A review totract costs and the contractor's practices were not determine whether contracts are based on current,in compliance with cost accounting standards. complete, and accurate cost or pricing data (the

Truth in Negotiations Act).Misclassified Costs

Indirect Rate InformationBy reviewing the contractor's performancerecords on seven contracts, the auditor found A contractor had available lower indirect ratethat engineering efforts were misclassified as information that was not disclosed to theproduction efforts. The contractor also Government during negotiations. Thecommingled the cost history of other similar contractor contended that the rate information,production to use as the basis for negotiation of while not made available, was separatelytheawarded contracts. Since the commingled identified and submitted. The Truth indata was not disclosed to the Government Negotiations Act requires the contractor tonegotiator, and the adjusted production data disclose the most current data available whensupported lower direct labor costs, the production negotiating. The contractor also had therequirements were overstated. A price reduction responsibility to disclose the impact of the lowerof $8.5 million was negotiated. rates on the proposal. Since the lower rate

information was not used, the contractor'sForward Pricing Proposal Audits- A proposal was overstated. A contract pricereview of estimated future costs of proposed reduction of $1.2 million was made.contract prices, proposed contract change orders,costs for redeterminable fixed-price contracts, Performance Recordsand costs incurred but not yet covered bydefinitized contracts. A contractor did not disclose its most recent

purchased material vendor quotes duringMaterial Purchases and Quantity Discounts negotiations. The vendor quotes were lower than

the corresponding estimates used in theA review of a contractor's firm-fixed-price contractor's proposal and would have resulted inproposal resulted in savings of $150.4 million by a lower contract price. A price reduction of $1negotiating a reduced contract price. The million was achieved on the contract.

2-2

EXHIBIT4 1/CONTRACT AUI)iT REPORTS ISSUE)DEFENSE CONTRACT AUI)IT AGENCY

(For the 6.month Period Ending March 31, 1990)

Amount(5 in millions)

Type of Audit ReportsIssued Funds Put

Examined Disallowed to BetterCosts Use 4/

Incurred Costs 16,405 $34,447.5 $598.4 N/AForward Pricing Proposals 10,180 78,658.4 N/A $6,709.7Cost Accounting Standards 2,234 131.1 72.7 N/ADefective Pricing 2/ 910 0.0 270.0 N/AOther3/ 78 0.0 0.0 N/A

Total 29,807 $113,237.0 $941.1 $6,709.7

1/ Because ol'the short time between data availabiity and legislative deadline, exhibitdata may change based on

subsequent )CAA authentication.

2/ Defective pricing dollars examined are not reported because they are considered a duplication ol'fbrward

pricing dollars reported as examined.

3/ Includes contract coordination programs, GAO activity, special projects and studies, and suspected irregular

conduct case,.4/ Cost avoidance.

EXHIBIT 5 /CONTRACT AUDIT REPORTS CLOSEI) 2/DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY

(For the 6.month Period Ending March 31,1990)

Amount($ in millions)

Type of Audit ReportsTpofAdtClosed Funds PutAudit Disallowed to Bet

Exceptions Costs to 31

Incurred Costs 1,146 $317.4 $175.2 N/AForward Pricing Proposals 3,809 3,266.2 N/A $1,234.1Cost Accounting Standards 17 7.2 3.8 N/ADefective Pricing 178 107.4 27.4 N/A

Total 5,150 $3,698.2 $206.4 $1,234.1

I/ Because ol the short time between data avaiiduility rand iegi ltive deadli.nes, exhi-i. data mLy change

based on subsequent DCAA authentication.

2/ Reports issued to procurement and/or administrative contracting officers that had audit exceptions upon

which final contracting officer decisions were rendered during the period. Reported benefits are based on contracting

officer decisions and are subject to later change where contractors have appealed disputed items to the Armed Services

Board ol'Contract Appeals, or where other litigation is pending. Estimated netsavings of$313.5 million are

associated with such pending cases as follows: Incurred Costs- $250 million; Cost Accounting Standards - $25.6 million;

Defective Pricing - $37.9 million.

3/Cost avoidance.

2-3

Operations Audits - An evaluation of an auditor contended that it was not in theorganizational unit or function within u Government's best interest to share in thecontractor's business to determine whether increased costs resulting from stepped up assetefficient and economical methods are used in the values. Subsequently, the audit position wasperformance of Government work. Operating sustained and the Government saved $203audits include the review and evaluation of million.policies, procedures, controls, and performance toassure that a reasonable level of cost efficiency is Material Transfersachieved to accomplish contract requirements.Audit exceptions are reported as cost avoidances A contractor's interdivisional material costwhen identified with unnecessary or inefficient transfers to Government contracts were notoperations. When the audits disclose instances of based on costs as required by the FAR. Themischarging or improper accounting, the audit contractor used full material selling prices of theexceptions are reported as costs questioned, commercial division, including profits as the

basis of the transfers, causing more cost andLegal Support Costs profit to be negotiated on the Government

contracts. Based on the audit results, theA contractor billed the Government for employee contractor refunded the Government $6.5salaries and legal costs related to suspension and million.debarment proceedings which are unallowableunder the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Claims AuditsThe FAR requires the contractor to identify andexclude these billings from Government Unsubstantiated Costsreimbursement vouchers. The contractorinsisted that the records and related A review of eleven equitable adjustment claimsdocumentation on specific employees were on a contract found that the contractor claimedprotected under the attorney client and attorney costs that were unsubstantiated, erroneous orwork product privileges. The auditor contended duplicative. The claimed costs were notthat the denial of the records was unreasonable reconcilable to contractor cost records and weresince they were cost or pricing data. Assisted by not based on actual costs. The contacting officerthe contracting officer, the records and supported the audit and the matter was referredsupporting documentation were obtained. Based to the Armed Service Board of Contract Appeals.on the audit, the contractor refunded the The contractor subsequently agreed to an out ofGovernment $623,000. court settlement of $2.9 million.

Terminated Contracts Termination Settlement

A review of two terminated contracts resulted in A contractor erroneously claimed costs related tosavings of$15.9 million. The contractor claimed common items, applied overhead rates tolosses on land values, unrealized contract profits settlement expenses, reclassified general andand unrealized losses on land improvements, all administrative expenses to factory overhead, andof which are unallowable under Federal included settlement expenses as other directregulations. The contracting officer sustained costs. The contracting officer support the auditthe recommended reductions. findings and the contractor agreed to a

settlement of $3.6 million.Purchased Asset Value

Labor and Material CostsA contractor stepped up the value of purchasedassets to reflect fair market value and charged A contractor claimed labor and material coststhe additional depreciation, amortization and incurred due to alleged defective Governmentcost of money to Government contracts. The furnished materials and delays caused by the

2-4

Government. Using graphic and computational Significant CoE Auditsanalysis, the auditor showed that the claimincluded indirect unallowable expenses and Excavation and Disposal of Embankmentsproduction-related productivity losses notobligated to be paid by the Governhent. The Auditors reviewed a contractor proposal forGovernment realized a savings of $2.7 million, excavation and disposal of ombankments at the

Gray's Landing and Dlam Project. The contractorProfessional Liability Insurance (1.iA asserted that there were defective specifications

and differing site conditions associated with theA contractor's claim included PlI premiums project. The auditors questioned over $165,000based on a method of allocation to Government of the proposed costs, all of which were sustainedcontracts not supported by procurement by the contracting officer.regulations. The contractor's distribution of P1I.was not proportional to the benefits received on Equitable Adjustment ClaimGovernment contracts which increased the costsallocated to the contracts. The review of the An audit of an equitable adjustment claim forclaim resulted in Government savings of $20.9 about $3.1 million found questioned costs,million, unsupported costs and unresolved costs of over

$2.7 million. The questioned costs involved theU.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS method used by the contractor to price overhead(CoE) and profit, an option to buy rental equipment

through a contractor controlled rental companyAuditors issued 131 reports that examined over and miscellaneous revenues. The claim was$300 million (exhibit 6, below, and exhibit 7, settled through mediation with a lump sumpage 2-6). payment of $1,155,700.

EXHIBIT6CONTRACT AUDIT REPORTS ISSUE[)

U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS(For the 6-month Period Ending March 31, 1990))

Amount($ in millions)

Type of Audit Issued 1 Pu

Examined Disallowed Funds PutCosts to BetterCnors CUse I/

Incurred Costs 2 0 $1. 6 N/AForward Pricing Proposals 52 70.6 N/A $5.1Defective Pricing 7 13.1 .4 N/AOther 9 14.8 .8 N/A

Total 131 $305.0 $15.8 $5.1

i Cost avoidance.

2-5

EXHIBIT7CONTRACT AUDIT REPORTS CLOSED

U. S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS(For the 6-rnonth Period Ending March 31,1990)

Amount($ in millions)

TI'ype of Audit ReportsClosed Funds Put

Audit Disallowed to Bet

Exceptions Costs UeUse

Incurred Costs 33 $1.4 $.8 N/AForward Pricing Proposals 36 2.2 N/A $1.5Defective Pricing 4 .1 -- N/AOther 7 1.1 1.0 N/A

Total 80 $4.8 $1.8 $1.5

IG, Dol), CONTRACT AUDIT , Report on the Followup OversightPOLICY AND OVERSIGHT Review of the DCAA Audits of Indirect

Expenses at Major Contractors (APO 90-The Assistant Inspector General for Audit Policy 001). The review found that the certificationand Oversight provides policy for and oversight requirement of Public Law 99-145, has resultedof the contract audit organizations in the Do). in more reliable contractor indirect expense

claims. The DCAA audits are not disclosing asThis office also coordinates IG, Doi), comments much unallowable expenses as they were prior toon proposed changes to acquisition regulations, certification. By ensuring that contractors'The office provided advice to the investigative procedures for removing unallowable items fromorganization and expert witnesses on contract claims are adequate, the DCAA can better utilizeaudit matters to the Department ofJustice. its resources in reducing the audit backlog of

indirect expenses. Recommendations were madeThe office issued two contract audit policies and for the DCAA to revise audit risk analysis,four oversight reports on the I)CAA. The content planning procedures, and guidance focusingof those policies and reviews follow: audit effort on evaluating the contractors'

screening procedures.-m Policy Memorandum No. 3 - DoD

Contract Audit Policy. The policy clarifies the a Report on the Operations Auditsresponsibility of the IG, DoD, for providing policy Performed by the DCAA (A PO 90-003). Thedirection to the l)ol) contract audit organizations review indicated that the I)CAA is performingand requires the audit agencies to coordinate many of its operations audits as joint efforts withtheir internal procedure changes that affect the contract administration offices under theaudit policy with the OG, Doi). "Cost Monitoring Coordinator" program re-

quired at major contractor locations. The jointv Policy Memorandum No. 4 -Access to efforts have resulted in more effective and effici-

Records, The policy requires contract auditors ent reviews and reduced duplication of effort.to review aii contractor records necessary tocomply with the Government Audit Standards as i Report on the Followup Oversightrevised-in 1988 and specifies the types of records Review of the I)CAA Managementcontract auditors should have access to in order Information System (A PO 90-004). Theto comply with the standards, DCAA has generally implemented the agreed to

2-6

recommendations in our previous reports. It has, Space Industries Association have shown stronghowever, failed to caveat the Semiannual Report support for the program. Success stories to datefor the amount of savings reflected by unilateral include:decisions of the contracting officer that aresubsequently appealed by contractors. The oGeneral Dynamics-Convair Division,review of the March 31, 1988 Semiannual implemented all five chapters of the CRAG.Report continues to show the need for greater They improved their internal control systemscare by the auditors in analyzing negotiation which substantially reduced the audit risk. Thememoranda to determine the appropriate DCAA redirected over 1,700 audit hours to othersavings and awareness of the proper procedures areas to reduce the backlog of overhead audits.for calculated savings. Significant inaccuraciesin the statistics reported were found. Based on a oAt McDonnell Aircraft Company the DCAAstatistical sample of the savings reported in the eliminated 18 planned defective pricing auditsMarch 31, 1988 report, $288 million was totaling 5,400 hours because of contractoroverstated, or 10 percent of the amount reported. initiated estimating improvements. McDonnellCorrective actions are being taken. performed internal audits, self-initiated

defective pricing audits and made voluntaryi Interim Report on Oversight of DCAA refunds of identified overpricing.

Referrals of Equitable Adjustment Claimsfor Violations of the False Claims Act. The Martin Marietta Astronautics Groupreview found that 29 percent of the audits were of implemented CRAG areas and several non-improperly prepared claims. The claims were CRAG areas. Because the I)CAA could-rely onhighly suspicious of violating the False Claims these actions, over 2,700 hours will be reducedAct. Even though-the contracts were completed from planned DCAA audits. The DCAA will-useand actual costs of performance were known, the the time saved to audit the backlog of incurredaudit found that the claims were completely costs-that was unplanned.unsupported. The audit reports provided littlefactual information that could be used to settle In 1990, the Doi), defense contractor associationsthe claims. Because factual data was not and professional audit organizations willexamined, the basis for an investigative referral cosponsor new joint efforts to expandwas not possible. participation in the CRAG.

Contractor Risk Assessment Guide DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE(CRAG) Program MANAGEMENT AUDIT

FOLLOWU P STATUS REPORTThe IG, DoD, originated the CRAG program in (Contract Audit)1988 in conjunction with other 1)oI) componentsand industry. The CRAG spells out Doi) control The IG, DoD), conducts oversight reviews to makeobjectives and ways of implementing appropriate sure Dol) components implement policies forcontrol systems in specific high risk areas. The timely, properly documented settlement ofprogram encourages coordination of Government contract audit issues. Members of the IG, Doi),and contractor audit planning, with the followup staff visited 25 acquisition offices toexpectation that the Doi) will reduce direct determine the adequacy of followup proceduresoversight effort whenever the contractor can at those locations. A number of ongoing reviewsdemonstrate that adequate control systems exist. will be concluded in the next semiannual

reporting period.The IG, Dol), urges contractors to participate.Thus far, participation has been disappointing The )ol) contracting organizations reported 774(about 12 major contractors), however, numerous significant, postaward DCAA contract auditsuccess stories h~ve come to our attention and we reports over 6 months old as undecided as ofare optimistic that many skeptical contractors March 31, 1990. Those reports have questionedwill be won over by them. The I)CAA, costs of $1.7 billion. The high number ofComptroller, Defense Logistics Agency, Institute undecided reports is a source of considerableof Internal Auditors, and Council of Defense and concern. a

2-7

DoD, homicide, assault, drug violations andCHAPTER3 property crimes. The NIS and the AFOSI also

conduct counterintelligence investigations.

CRIMINAL This chapter gives summary statistics andINVESTI GATIONS selected fraud cases investigated by the DCIS,CIDC, NIS and AFOSI. It also provides I, l)oD,

criminal investigation policy and oversightThe Department's criminal investigative activities.organizations are the Defense CriminalInvestigative Service (DCIS)--an arm of the IG, Exhibits 8,9 and 10, on pages 3-4, 3-7 and 3-9,DoD--the Army Criminal Investigation respectively, show information on investigativeCommand (CIDC), the Naval Investigative case loads and the results achieved during thisService Command (NIS) and the Air Force Office period. The exhibits do not reflect the results ofof Special Investigations (AFOSI). These general investigations or counterintelligenceorganizations investigate fraud against the activities.

SIGNIFICANT FRAUD CASES Control Valves

Product Substitution Seventeen individuals were convicted after atask force investigation, initiated after a volun-

Hose Assemblies tary disclosure, revealed product substitution,kickbacks and mischarging. The 17 individuals

An investigation resulted in guilty pleas to were employees ofTarget Rock, Inc., a whollycriminal charges by I loseco Incorporated, aka. owned subsidiary of Curtiss-Wright Corporation,Signal-Ilill Corporation, and its president,who and employees of subcontractors and suppliers.manufacture hoses, hose assemblies and related Target Rock manufacturs hydraulically operatedfittings used in the F-I 11 bomber, the F-16 control valves for use in Navy nuclear reactors.fighter aircraft missile systems, trident Two employees used an unapproved machiningsubmarines, tracked vehicles and helicopters, process to produce the valves. They concealedThe corporation provided substandard, defective the process by producing invoices from ahose assemblies, but billed the Government for fictitious company showing the correct work washigh quality, high priced hoses. Prior to done. Navy testing showed no safety hazardshipment, at the direction of the corporation's resulted from the substitution. The otherpresident, the markings were removed to individuals were convicted of tax evasion, falsepreclude detection of product substitution. statements, conspiracy and mai I fraud.

I loseco could be fined $500,000. The corporate The sentences to date range from-2 months'president could be fined $100,000 and sentenced probation for defendants who cooperated in theto one year in jail. (I)CIS) investigation to 3 years in jail and $100,000 inm, ,.fines for each ofthe principals in the scheme.

I(NIS/I)CIS)i . Defective Helicopter Parts

iR & R Precision Company manufactured main- ~ Irotor shaft nuts for Air Force helicopters These

parts, according to Air Force officials,are the. single most critical part on 11-3 helicopters. If

they fail the rotor will fall off.

'li'hc .unipAny pruaiditt, Bub Rawlings, wasconvicted and sentenced to two years in jail for

An F-16 launches an AMRAAM (DoD Photo) knowingly manufacturing defective main rotor

3-1

nuts. In addition, Rawlings must serve three supplied asphalt to the Army Corps of Engineersyears' probation and pay $20,000 in restitution. %'th laboratory reports proving that the asphalt(AFOSI) met contract specifications. The company

altered the laboratory reports which originallyGear Assemblies showed that the asphalt did not meet thespecifications.

The owner of I)EET Enterprises and his son, theowner of APT Manufacturing, Inc., inanu- The company was fined $25,000 and paidfactured metallic components for gear assem- $45,000 in restitution and investigative costs.blies used in various I)ol) weapons systems. (CIDC)They supplied the Government with noncon-forming defective parts made of inferior mater - Defective Weapons Partsials. The items are critical and could result inlife-threatening situations if they were used, The J.C. Manufacturing Company and six

individuals pleaded guilty to multiple chargesA criminal information was filed charging two after an investigation established that theycounts of false claims and two counts of conspir- provided defective breech bolts for the M 16acy. Both owners face up to five years in jail for rifle and the M60 machine gun, as well aseach count and fines of nearly $1.5 million. The defective launch tubes for the M203 grenadeowner of APT has agreed to make restitution of launcher.nearly $283,000. The owner of DEET has agreedto make restitution of about $58,000. (DCIS) The defendants were sentenced to jail terms

ranging from I to 3 years and paid $55,000 inSubstandard Asphalt restitution. The company and the individualswere debarred from receiving future contracts.Sierra Ready Mix and Materials Company The current contracts were terminated. (I)CIS)

Marines equipped with M.) 6s and M-203 grenade launchers (DoD photo)

3-2

Substandard Fasteners Defective Pricing

A joint investigation resulted in a guilty plea by Overpriced AluminumLawrence Engineering and Supply, Inc., and twocompany officials. They pleaded guilty to Boeing Military Airplanes Corporation hadcharges of conspiracy to defraud the Government twelve contracts to replace the aluminum bkinsand making false statements on Government of KC- 135 transport and refueling aircraft. Thecontracts. The contracts supplied fasteners for company told the Government that the cost ofuse in manufacturing tanks, armored personnel aluminum was 12 to 13 percent higher than itcarriers, aircraft structural assemblies, missiles was actually paying its suppliers for the product.and the space shuttle. Lawrence submittedfalsified test data to show the fasteners met A civil settlement of$13 million was reached.specifications when in fact they did not. (1)CIS)

The company paid fines and restitution of Navy Aircraft$625,000 and was suspended from receivingfuture contracts. The officers await sentencing. The McDonnell Aircraft Company agreed to an(NIS/AIOOSI/I)CIS) administrative settlement of $12.2 million.

Substandard Springs The investigation disclosed that the companyprovided false and inaccurate data during con-

The Betts Spring Company and Kenneth Meeks, tract negotiations for purchase of aircraft by thean employee, were indicted for submitting Navy. The Department of Justice declined crimi-falsified test results for torsion leaf springs used nal/civil action in lieu of the settlement. (NIS)in constructing Marine Corps amphibiousassault vehicles. The substandard springs Data Concealed In Negotiationcreated a safety hazard for Marines operating thevehicles. RCA Aerospace and Defense Automated

Systems, a part of the General ElectricThe company and the employee face maximum Company, concealed information during afines of $130,000 and Meeks faces a possible 65 contract negotiation. The information pertainedyears in jail. (NIS) to actual labor hours required for the

Amphibious assault vehicles manuever after crossing a body of water. (DoD photo)

3-3

EXHIBIT8INVESTIGATIVE CASE RESULTS

(For the 6.month Period Ending March 31, 1990)

Totals for Period

CASE RESULTSLocal/State/Foreign

Litigation ResultsIndictments

)CIS 153 18 11Military Services 114 492 " 64Joint DCIS/Services 4 9

ConvictionsDCIS 119 1 4Military Services 152 331 115Joint )CIS/Services 3 5

Pretrial DiversionsI)CIS 4 4Military Services 13Joint DCIS/Services 2

Article 15sDCISMilitary Services 334Joint DCIS/Services 9

Civil Settlements/JudgmentsDCIS 24Military Services 113 N/A 2/Joint DCIS/Services I

Monetary OutcomesFines/Forfeitures

DCIS $28,477,461 $54,028 $4,234Military Services 605,806 4,217,954 2,432,514Joint DCIS/Services 18,818,251

RestitutionsI)CIS 5,481,710 400Military Services 3,832,283 208,880 42,019Joint I)CIS/Services 263,600

Recoveries 3/I)CIS 46,275,558Military Services 46,057,953Joint l)CIS/Services 9,132,541

Civil Settlements/JudgmentsDCIS 23,899,392Military Services 56,738,422 N/A 2/Joint )CIS/Services 950,000 A- I

I/ Representcs that an Article 32 officer has recommended a court martial to the convening authority.2/ Military command is not responsible l'or civil settlements or judgments.3/Includes dollars returned to the Gove nment under administrative procedures or recovered during theinvestigation.

3-4

manufacture and assembly of adaptor kits for the for work performed on the Distant EarlyM-I tank and diagnostic test kits for the Bradley Warning ()EW) Line Radar System.Fighting Vehicle.

The contractor improperly accounted for non-The Army Tank-Automotive Command work days of some employees, thereby over-overpaid the company by about $250,000, stating the actual manpower level. The companybased on inaccurate data provided during the was supposed to credit the Air Force whennegotiation. The company repaid $900,000 as a manning fell below the established level.result of an out of court settlement reached withthe Government. (CIDC) A $4.25 million settlement was reached. (AFOSI)

Labor and Material Costs Mischarged

The Department of Justice negotiated a $2.5million settlement with Avondale Industries,Inc., a predecessor of Avondale Shipyards, Inc.

An investigation established that 34 employeesof Avondale Shipyard shifted labor costs andwelding material costs to Navy contracts. The 34employees were previously convicted in a state or

Alt- "federal court. (NIS)

Bid Rigging

School and Military Dairy Products

Borden, Incorporated, and the SouthlandCorporation pleaded guilty to multi-count felonyinformations. They conspired to rig school andmilitary dairy product bids in several Floridaand Georgia counties and in the Commonwealthof Puerto Rico.

M2-3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle (DoD Photo)Borden will pay $5.5 million and Southland will

Cost Mischarging pay $6 million in Fines and civil settlements.(1)CIS)

Labor Costs MischargedConstruction Project

Aerojet General Corporation filed a voluntarydisclosure report indicating that labor costs were The T.L. James and Company, Incorporatedmischarged on an Army Communications - (TLJ), pleaded guilty to rigging bids on an ArmyElectronics Command contract. Corps of Engineers dredging construction

project.The company paid $311,000 with the disclosure.Verification established that an additional The company suppressed and eliminated$278,000 in mischarging took place A civil competition for the award and performance of thesettlement resulted and the company paid the hydraulic cutter head beach nourishment projectadditional amount. (CIDC) in Delray Beach, Florida. The project was allo-

cated to a co-conspirator and collusive, non-Manpower Costs Overcharged competitive, rigged bids were submitted.

Felec Services, Incorporated, a subsidiary of I'T7, rIAJ paid a criminal fine and civil damages ofprovided the Air Force with levels of manpower $1.2 million. (l)CIS)

3-5

Construction In Japan progress payments aminting to 95 percent ofthe total due under the two contracts. The

The Department of Justice, Civil and Antitrust company then defaulted on the contracts afterDivisions, negotiated a $32.7 million settlement receiving $269,459 in progress payments.agreement with 99 construction contractorsin Japan. The settlement resulted from One of the subjects pleaded guilty and wasan investigation into a collusive bidding sentenced to 6 months in a community treatmentscheme by approximately 140 Japanese facility, 5 years' probation and 200 hoursconstruction contractors. community service. Restitution to the Army was

ordered in the amount of $293,438. (CI )C)The contractors regularly met and determinedthe bid amounts and the winner on approxi- Flight Data Transmittersmately 240 Navy construction contracts. TheJapanese Fair Trade Commission cooperated in A task force investigation by the AFOSI, I)CIS,the investigation, ordering $2.2 million in fines NIS and the Federal Bureau of Investigation,be paid to the Japanese Government. Another 70 resulted in a guilty plea by Northrop Corporationcompanies were warned against continuing anti- for making false statements to the Air Force andcompetitive practices. (NIS) the Navy. The manager of Northrop's Western

Services Division also pleaded guilty.False Claims and False Statements

False certificates of conformance were submittedFalse Progress Payments to the Government for flight data transmitters

used on the air launched cruise missile and theTwo principals of SME Prime Company, Inc. rate sensor assemblies used on Harrier jets.conspired to obtain funds from the Government Northrop did not perform the requiredby submitting false claims for progress payments component testing but certified that the tests hadunder two fixed price contracts for producing been conducted and that the parts met allparts for M60 tanks. The subjects intentionally requirements. The critical items could haveunderbid nn the contracts. They maintained resulted in life-threatening situations if they hadfalse records to show progress and obtained been used.

Northrop agreed to payfines of $17 million. Themanager faces up to 40years in jail and $80,000in fines.(AFOSI/I)CIS/NIS)

Failure to Test

A joint investigationconducted by the )CISand the NIS resulted in acivil settlement with theElano East Corporation,a subsidiary of theGeneral ElectricCompany (GE).

Elano East manufacturestubing parts which aresold to GE for use inmilitary jet engines. Theparts had not been tested,but Elano East certified

M-60s move along desert tank trails. (DoD Photo) that they had been.

3-6

EXHIBIT9INVESTIGATIVE CASE RESULTS

(Administrative Actions)(For the 6.month Period Ending March 31, 1990)

Investigative Activity

Administrative Actions

DCIS Military TotalServices

Contractor Actions 1/l)ebarments 458Suspensions 187Other Actions 2/ 12 109 121

Personnel Actions 3/Reprimands 1 190 191Demotions 1 12 13Terminations 4 137 141Other4/ 14 473 487

Management Actions 6 50 56

11 Suspensions and debarments reflected are the results ofinvestigations, and other information brought to

the attention of the DoD.21 Includes terminations and recisions, reimbursements, recoupments, and other contract actions taken

under administrative procedures.31 Only those resulting from investigative activities.

41 Includes administrative discharges and dismissals, counseling, and any other punitive personnel actionstaken as a result of the investigation, except discharges resulting from military court action.

Noncertified testers performed testing functions Munitions Contractand noncertified welders performed weldingfunctions. Also, an Elano East production Richard Marcinko, a retired Naval officer and amanager substituted rejected parts on a former commanding officer of a Navy SEALGovernment shipment. team, and Charles Byers, the President of

Accuracy Systems Inc., were convicted ofThe amount of the settlement was $1.1 million, multiple offenses on a munitions contract.(DCIS/NIS) Marcinko conspired with Byers to overcharge the

Government $100,000 on a contract to purchaseFalse Claim grenades. Byers paid a portion of the overcharge

to a company established by Marcinko and otherBrown Brothers, Inc. was contracted to complete unindicted co-conspirators.a civil works project for the Army Corps ofEngineers, Detroit District. The firm completed Byers was sentenced to 21 months in jail andthe work and submitted a $7 million claim, paid $50,000 in restitution. Marcinko was

sentenced to 21 months in jail and fined $10,000.An investigation established that the claim (NIS)contained numerous misrepresentations of factand false statements. A settlement was reached Bomber Windshieldsin which $6.9 million of the claim was not paid.The firm was debarred from receiving future A joint investigation by the I)CIS and theGovernment contracts. (CiDC) Federal Bureau of Investigation resulted in the

3-7

indictment of Swedlow, Incorporated, and the of free soft drinks, discounts and other favors to avice president of Design Engineering and company the Navy employee formed to sell softQuality Control. Both were charged with drinks.preparing documentation that misrepresentedand concealed unauthorized repairs on B-I If convicted, Mid Atlantic Coca-Cola could bebomber windshields, fined up to $5.5 million and the individuals face

imprisonment of between 5 and 90 years andIf convicted the official faces up to 20 years in fines exceeding $250,000. The trial is pending.jail. Both could be fined up to $1 million. (DCIS) (NIS)

Other Indictments andConvictions

Trafficking of ClassifiedDocuments

Hughes Aircraft Company,...- _- Grumman Corporation,

' -F --. Raytheon Company, RCA- _ .- Corporation and Boeing

Corporation pleaded guilty toBI -B (DoD Photo) unlawful conveyance of Dol)

classified documents. The documents set forthBribery and Kickbacks the priority list of weapons systems and other

matters related to the national defense.Collusion with Vendors

The Defense contractors, through theirJeyco Products, Incorporated, Las Palmas employees, unlawfully acquired the classifiedDistributors and four civilian Navy employees documents. The information gave them an edgepleaded guilty to bribery or unlawful receipt of in planning research and development activitiescompensation. and in shifting emphasis from some programs to

others.Employees of a Navy public works facility in SanDiego, California, acted in collusion with ollughes paid a $3.5 million civil settlement,vendors. 'Th.. investigation established that $50,000 for the cost of the investigation andvendors provided Government purchasing $50,000, representing the salary of its employeeagents with electrical equipment and tools in who was engaged in the unlawful activity.exchange for orders placed with their companies.

oGrumman paid a $2.5 million civilThe four Government employees were placed on settlement, a criminal fine of $20,000 and a courtprobation, fined and required to perform assessment of $100.community service. The two companies and theindividuals connected with them are awaiting oRaytheon paid $1 million to settle allsentencing. (NIS) criminal and civil claims.

Merchandise for Contracts o RCA paid a $2.5 million civil settlement, acriminal fine of $20,000 and a special assessment

Trhe Mid-Atlantic Coca-Cola Bottling Company, of $250.

two of its former officers and a former employeeof the Navy Resale and Support Service, were o Boeing paid a $4 million restitution, $1indicted for bribery and conspiracy. The Navy million for the cost of the investigation, a fine ofcivilian allegedly helped the company win multi $20,000, and $200,000, representing the salary ofmillion dollar contracts. In exchange, Mid- its employee who was engaged in the unlawfulAtlantic Coca-Cola provided thousands of cases activity. (I)CIS)

3-8

EXHIBIT 10THEFT/ FRAUD INVESTIGATIVE CASE INVENTORY

(For the 6-month Period Ending March 31, 1990)

Investigative Cases

Investigative Activity

Closed Cases by Functional Area

I)CIS Military TotalServices

Pay and Allowance Fraud 1 10 665 675Nonappropriated Fund Fraud 2/ 1 169 170Procurement Programs/Systems Fraud 243 443 686Commissary Fraud 16 16Property Disposal Programs/Systems Fraud 3 9 12Bribery of Government Officials 15 87 102Conflict of Interest 16 107 123Damage, Wrongful Destruction (includes Arson) 273 273Government Theft (over $1,000) 31 35 1,861 1,896CIIAMPUS Fraud 9 16 25Fraudulent Personnel Actions 2 95 97Other 4/ 72 1574 1646

Total 406 5,315 5,721-

1/ Includes travel/per diem fraud.2/ Includes military exchange stores and morale/welfure/recreation activities.3/ Includes larceny, theft, or wrongful appropriation of Go ernment property, funds, or services, whether by forgery,

embezzlement, computer fraud, burglary, robbery, or other means.4/ Forgery, blackmarketing, smuggling, burglary, counterfeiting, dependency assistance, fraud-special inquiries,unauthorized services, and other Government fraud.

Double Billings Conflict Of Interest

A review of contract documents at an Army Eugene Schaltenbrand, a retired Air Forcecontracting center discovered double billings by Reserve Colonel, was convicted of violatingAnker Kolen Maatschappij, B.V., a Dutch conflict of interest laws. Schaltenbrand workedshipping firm that delivered coal to various U.S. on contracts with a contractor during reservemilitary installations in Europe. duty. Although he received preemployment

briefings about working for contractors he laterA joint investigation by DCIS, CI DC, with applied for and obtained employment with theassistance from IG, DoD, auditors, revealed that same contractor, working on the same contractAnker Kolen was overpaid by $7.8 million for for which he had represented the Air Force.double billings and systemic shortcomings fordelivery and payment under the contract. Schaltenbrand was sentenced to six months in

jail and fined $2,500 on each of two counts.The Government recouped $3.8 million and a (AFOSI)voluntary payment of $1.3 million was made bythe contractor. A final demand letter was issued Operation Illwindto the contractor for $3.4 million, which includesinterest and costs of the investigation. The joint investigation by N IS and Federal(1)CIS/CII)C) Bureau of Investigation of wide spread and

3-9

multifaceted procurement fraud in the 1)ol) the New Cumberland Army Depot, Newcontinues. During the reporting period, the Cumberland, PA. The survey was based onfollowing results were obtained: problems identified in the supply directorate,

which reviews, manages and disposes of depot" Conviction of 21 individuals and one company. inventories in excess of $3 billion.

* Criminal fines of $1,544,050 and civil fines of The survey included a study of misidentified$3,000,000. property processed to the Defense Reutilization

and Management Office, misidentified dormant* Forfeitures of $1,500,00, reimbursements of depot stock, misidentified new receipts received$1,655,000 and administrative recoveries of from contracting sources, material misidentified$6,475,500. as a result of national stock number and part

number mismatch, and misidentified materiel in* Suspension of I company and 6 individuals and active storage.the debarment of 12 companies and 7individuals. The depot commander agreed with the survey

findings and initiated a task force to address andA substantial portion of the monetary results resolve the issues. Army materiel was correctlyshown above resulted from a guilty plea by the reidentified and made accessible for issue andLoral Corporation. use, resulting in an actual gain to the inventory

of over $32 million.Loral paid over $500,000 to a private consultant.In return, the consultant provided bogus reports CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONSwhich hid his role as a conduit of sensitive POLICY AND OVERSIGHTinformation on pending military contracts andimproper influence over the Defense procure- The IG, )ol), exercises authority for )ol)ment process. The consultant admitted that the investigative policy and oversight through theDeputy for Tactical Systems within the Office of Assistant Inspector General for Criminalthe Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Investigations Policy and Oversight (CIPO). TheAcquisitions assisted him- The consultant also office issues investigative policy directives for alladmitted that the former Assistant Secretary of DoD criminal investigative organizationsthe Navy for Research, Engineering and Systems (DCIOs). The OAIG-CIPO is the point of contactinfluenced the Navy procurement process. and coordinator for voluntary disclosures made

by Defense contractors. That initiative wasLoral received the prices and proposals of a undertaken to enhance contractor self-competitor for the Navy airship contract. It governance by encouraging contractors tomade false certifications to the Air Force on its report potential civil or criminal fraud directlyaccess to sensitive source selection for conducting to the DoD. To date the Department hascompetition on advanced radar warning received 191 disclosures resulting in $96.8receivers. (NIS) million being returned to the Government and

34 prosecutions.Indictments and Convictions

Participation by contractors in the VoluntaryExhibit 11, pages 3-12 through 3-15, shows some Disclosure Program has communicated to theirof the major indictments and convictions employees that criminal actions will not beobtained by DoD criminal investigative condoned or tolerated. The program is an impor-organizations from October 1, 1989, through tant way to build confidence between theMarch 31, 1990. Government and industry. The adoption of this

corporate policy demonstrates to the public thatIREVENTION ACTIVITI ES the Defense industry can take a strong stand

against illegal or improper conduct and set highArmy Crime Prevention Survey standards of conduct for Government

contractors.Special agents of the Army CriminalInvestigation Command conducted a crime During the period, 27 disclosures were receivedprevention survey on property accountability at from 20 Defense contractors.

3-10

The IG, I)oD, designated OAIG-CIPO as the l)ol) expended by the I)CIOs and the level of fraudfocal point for coordinating investigative efforts vulnerability awareness by DoD personnelunder the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Actor1986. CIPO coordinates, reviews, and refers During the period, CIPO representatives visitedfalse claim and false statement investigations to facilities in Savannah and Kings Bay, GA;reviewing officials for prosecution under the Act. Ilonolulu, Ill; and Lathrop, CA. The reviewsMatters involving allegations of false claims or identified programs and areas where potentialfalse statements made on or after October 21, fraud vulnerabilities should be addressed1986 (the effective date of the statute), whichhave been declined for action by a l)epartment of I losted a E'uropean Fraud ConferenceJustice element, are eligible for Program Fraud in Rome, Italy on sharing fraud schemes andconsideration. Dut ng the period, CIPO screened investigative techniques. Law enforcement19 closed investigative reports and referred 5 organizations from major North Atlantic Treatycases to a I)ol) reviewing official for action under Organization countries attended.the Act.

i Presented testimony before the U.S.Other policy and oversight activities included. Sentencing Commission on sentencing

guidelines for organizational defendants. Thea Issued two draft and one final criminal testimony focused on computation of loss in

investigations policy memoranda on the use of product substitution cases and a departure fromdeadly force by DCIO personnel, follow up on the "economic approach" in imposing criminalCIPO reports and the screening of major contract fines where a defective product causes a risk offraud accounting cases. serious personal injury.

n Issued a draft change for comments to i Served as the point of review and[)ol) Instruction 5505.2, "Criminal Investigation coordination for the issuance of IG subpoenas inof Fraud Offenses." support of audits and investigations. During the

period the IG, I)ol), issued 318 subpoenas, ofa Completed a review and issued a draft which 28 were subject to the Right to Financial

report on the personnel and case management Privacy Act. To date the IG, Io), has issuedsystems of the l)CIOs as they relate to fraud 3,431 subpoenas in connection with audits andinvestigations. The review concentrated on investigations.issues regarding productivity, organizationalgoals and priorities, performance rating i Delivered procurement fraud trainingstandards, and specific case management to all DCIO personnel, the Central Intelligenceprocedures. Agency, the Naval Inspector General and the

Inspector General Basic Training Program at thea Issued a draft report of a review on Federal Law EnforcementTraining Center.

workload and staff hours expended by the Additionally, CIPO personnel appeared asDCIOs. The draft contained a finding -2garding panelists in conferences and seminars sponsoredthe need for development ofs:ystems allowing by the Army Judge Advocate General School, theI)CIOs to identify specific effort levels dedicated Association of Government Accountants, theto particular investigations. Association of Federal Investigators, the

Industrial College of the Armed Forces, the'Conducted several fraud activity National Defense University and the Defense

reviews to assess fraud investigative efforts Logistics Agency General Counsel.

3-11

Exhibit 11

Examples of Major Indictments, Convictions, or RecoveriesObtained by Department of l)efense Criminal Investigative Organizations

(ror the period October 1, 1989 through March 31, 1990)

T Sentence/Fine/Recovery/ Dol)Type of Case Entities/Persons Settlement Activity

1. Product Substitution Darrel l). Ralph, Jr., 3 Count information. Pleaded guilty I)CISDarrel I). Ralph, Sr. 11/90.

2. Product Substitution Elano East Corp $1.1 million civil action 1)CIS/(Subsidiary of GE) NIS

3. Product Norman Nixon, VP Indictment - 4 counts 1)CISSubstitution/False Design EnginceringStatements & Qual. Control;

Swedlow, Inc.

4. Product Gwendolyn Joseph, 9 yrs. in jail; 5 yrs' probation; $1.3 I)CIS/Substitution/False G. Joseph Insurance million restitution; fined $750,000 CII)CStafments Co.

5. Product Hoseco Inc., AKA $76,000 fine; $5,000 restitution; 5 1)CISSubstitution/False Signal Hfill Corp; yrs' probationStatements Gregory I loback,

President

6. Product Joseph C. Jurak, 3 years in jail; $49,990 restitution I)CISSubstitution/False Former PreidntClaims and CEO; JC

Manufactut ing Inc.

7. False Claims Automated Data 10 count indictment DCISManagement, Inc.

8. False Claims SLI Avionics $4 million civil action DCIS

9. Bid Rigging Dunbar & Sullivan $475,000 criminal fine; $100,000 )CISDredging Co. civil fine

10. Bid Rigging Borden, Inc,; $5.5 million criminal fine/civil I)CISSouthland Corp. settlement; $6 million criminal

fine/civil settlement.

11. Bid TIL..James Co. $600,000 criminal fine; $600,000 D)ICSRigging/Conspiracy civil damages

12. Conspiracy/ I iughes Aircraft Co. $3.6 million criminal and civil I)CISConversion of Classified settlement; $50,000 reimbursementDocuments of investigation; $50,000 removal of

I overhead claims I '

3-12

Type of Case Entities/Persons Sentence/Fine/Recovery/ I)oDy Settlement Activity

13. Conspiracy/ The Boeing $20,000 fine; $4 million restitution; I)CISConversion of Classified Company $1 million reimbursementofDocuments investigation; $200,000 removal of

overhead claims

14. Conspiracy/ Richard Lee Fowler, 39 count conviction; currently in jail l)CISConversion of Classified Former Boeing Co. for civil contemptDocuments Marketing Analyst

15. Conspiracy/ RCA Corp. $20,000 criminal fine; $2.5 million I)CISConversion of Classified civil settlementDocuments

16. Conspiracy/ Raytheon Corp. $1 million civil and criminal I)CISConversion of Classified settlementDocuments

17. Conspiracy/ Grumman Corp. $20,000 criminal fine; $2.5 million I)CISConversion of Classified civil settlementDocuments

18. Product Northrop Corp; 34 count false state mii( Pts;Northrop AFOSI/SubstitutionlFalse Clarence Gonsalves, paid $17 million fine l)CIS/Statements Mgr, Western NIS

Service I)iv.; CherylIl annan, Qual.Assurance Spvsr.

19. Conspiracy/ Former Both sentenced to 3 yrs in jail I)CISExtortion Congressman

Robert Garcia; JaneGarcia

20. False Claims Brown Brothers, $6.9 million claim disallowed and CII)CInc. company debarred

21. False Claims SME Prime $293,438 restitution, 6 months in CI)C/Progress Payments Company, Inc. and community treatment facility, 5

two principals years' probation, 200 hourscommunity service

22. Product Sierra Ready Mix $25,000 fine, $45,000 in fines and CIDCSubstitution and Materials investigative costsL i nn I Company

3-13

Sentence/Fine/Recovery/ l)o[Type of Case Entities/Persons Settlement Activity

23. Defective Pricing RCA Aerospace and $900,000 out of court settlement C01)CDefense AutomatedSystems

24. Cost Mischarging Aerojet General $278,000 in addition to tie $311,000 CIDCCorporation paid with a voluntary disclosure

25. Product Lawrence $625,000 in fines and restitution I)CIS/Substitution Engineering and N ISf

Supply, Inc. AFOS1

26. Product Bob Rawlings, 2 years in jail, 3 years' probation and AFOSISubstitution President, R & Ii $ 20,000 in restitution

Precision Company

27. Conflict of Interest Eugene 2 years in jail and $5,000 in fines AFOSISchaltenbrand,Retired ColonelUSAF

28. )efective Pricing Boeing Military $13 million civil settlement I)CISAirplanes Corp.

29. Cost Mischarging Felec Services, Inc. $4.25 million settlement AFOSI

30. Defective Pricing Dakota Woodworks Pleaded guilty to 2 counts false AFOSIstatements. Sentencing pending

31. Operation Illwind 21 individuals and 21 convictions NIS13 companies $4.5 million civil fines

$1.5 forfeitures$1.2 million reimbursements$6 million administrative recoveries

32. Bid Rigging 99 Japanese $32.7 million settlement NIScontractors

33. Conspiracy to Richard Marcinko, 21 months in jail and a $10,000 fine NISDefraud/Conflict of CDR, USN for Marcink&.Interest (Ret.)and Charles 21 months in jail and $50,000

Byers, President of restitution for ByersAccuracy Systems,Inc.

34. CosL M isch argin g A v ondale $2.5 million settlement N I

4Inc.

3-14

Type of Case Entities/Persons Sentence/Fine/Recovery/ )o)Settlement Activity

35. Conspiracy-- Seventeen 52 months in jail NISIProduct Substitution, individuals relating 72 months' probation DCISKickbacks and to the Target Rock, $107,500 in finesMischarging Inc., investigation $6,000 special court assessments

4 awaiting sentencing

36. Bribery Jeyco Products, Inc.; Awaiting sentencing on one count NISJohn Daniel each of briberyJohnson, Salesman;Las PalmasDistributors; JacobLubarsky, owner

37. Product Betts Spring Awaiting sentencing on 13 counts NISSubstitution/False Company; Kenneth eachStatements Meeks

38. Bribery/Conspiracy Mid-Atlantic Coca- Company, Hedges, and Sabatino NISCola Bottling indicted on eleven counts of bribery,Company; Michael gratuities and conspiracy; ValerioA. I ledges, former indicted on one conspiracy count;vice president; trial is pendingJames J. Valerio,former controller;John H1. Sabatino,former Navyemployee

39. Defective Pricing McDonnell Aircraft $12.2 million administrative NISCompany settlement

40. False Statements/ Paul I). Crecelius 12 months in jail NISMail Fraud (False $46,395 in restitutionCertified Payrolls) 24 months' probation

41. Kickbacks John A. Gillardi, Jr. 2 years' probation NISI300 hours community service DCIS

42. False Claims for John Downing 3 years in jail and 3 years' probation NISWorkmen's $45,000 restitutionCompensation Benefits $80,000 lien against real estate

3-15

CHAPTER 4 llotline--as well as to the General AccountingOffice, the Military Departments, the DefenseAgencies and other DoD Components--include

OTHER product substitution, contract mischarging,overpricing, misusing Government authorityINVESTIGATIONS and property, falsifying official documents andrecords, improper contracting, mismanagement,

The Assistant Inspector General for Special and waste and abuse.

P~rograms operates the 10, DoD, Hotline and The Special Inquiries function gives an addedprovides a special inquiry capability, dimension to administrative investigative

The nationwide visibility of the Hotline makes it coverage. The investigators, many X)f whom are

an easy channel for the reporting of waste, fraud subject matter experts, furnish a quick response

and mismanagement in the l)ol). The kinds of to allegations on all aspects of Dol) operations

wrongdoing reported to the Defense and management.

IG, Dol), HOTLINE

The IG, D)oD, continues to encourage DoD expensive alternative was available Theemployees, military members, Dol) contractor required installation process was not Followed,employees and the public to contact the I lotline an economic analysis was not made, the proposedto report instances of fraud, waste and network was not staffed through the propermismanagement. The lotline celebrated its channels and waivers were not obtained for10th anniversary and has saved the Government components that did not meet specifications.over $100 million. These savings were achievedas a direct result of investigations or audits As a result of an audit, the Military Serviceinitiated in response to information provided by determined that expansion of the existingGovernment employees and private citizens. standard area network system could satisfy their

requirements and that the engineering,The I lotline has achieved indirect savings installation and integration for the expansionthrough improving management processes, could be accomplished by using a small businessdiscontinuing ongoing or recurring fraud or contract.waste, correcting errant officials and deterringwrongdoings by fines, penalties and criminal The monetary benefit is estimated at $1.7convictions. Many cases have valuable million. (88-G-44806)intangible results, such as identification ofineffective or dangerous weapons and Waste, Mismanagement and Reprisalequipment, which, if left uncorrected, couldendanger the lives of users. An inquiry failed to support an allegation that a

source suffered reprisal for filing a complaint ofThe Ilotline received 2,147 allegations, of which waste and mismanagement in a major tele-31 were General Accounting Office referrals. It communications program with his agency OIG.closed 772 cases. Exhibit 12, page 4-2, providesan analysis of the l)ol) lotline activity during The investigation of the source's originalthe period, complaint was not performed in a thorough

manner, did not comply with instructions andSignificant Investigative Findings had improperly divulged the source's identity AOriginating From Hotline Contacts reinvestigation of the allegation was directed by

the IG, Do).Wasteful Procurement

An IG, I)ol), review team found a mismanagedA Military Service procured a fiber optics local program and a shortfall of $3.2 million betweenarea network after being advised that a less costs and revenue because monthly recurring

4-1

EXHIBIT 12I)oi) HOTLINE PROGRAM ANALYSIS

(For the Period Ending March 31, 1990)

Program Analysis Totals

Calls and Letters

I)oi) Iotline 2,107GAOI lotline 31Other Sources 1/ 9

Total, Allegations Received 2,147

DispositionSubstantive Allegations:

Referred to Other Federal Agenciesand Departments 13

Referred to Dol) Components for Information(no investigation required) 212

Supplemental and Followup Contacts withI lotline Sources 2/ 409

Referred to l)ol) Components for Action(investigation, audit, or inspection) 459

lotline Source Asked to Contact Cognizant AgencyDirectly (allegation appears to warrant someaction, but not by the 10, I)ol)) 449

Subtotal (Substantive) 1,542Nonsubstantive Allegations 3/ 605Total 2,147

Status of Allegations Referred to l)oi) Audit,Inspection, and Investigative Components

Closed 772Open End of Period 741

I/ Consists mainly of letters sent to the l)oI) lotline by other Federal agencies.

2/ Reflects calls or an administrative nature inappropriate for lotlline action, and followup

cails made to and from the liotline about ongoing iotline cases.

3/ Contained insufficient data for action or did not fall into one of the categories under

substantive Allegations.

costs had not been reimbursed. VECP was withdrawn and the contract wasmodified. The Government saved $724,000. (88-

The recommendations reduced the shortfall and I-44368)saved $1.1 million. (87-T-04351 and V-,-44968)

Spare PartsTest Equipment A maintenance worker in a helicopter unit

A contractor sold the Governmenl high-cost. lest slockpiled high-cost. and repairable consumable

equipment required to meet production require- spare parts without proper authorization and

ments. The contractor, however, did not com- accountability. Five consumable items and 29

plete the manufacturing of the test equipment repairable items valued at $196,000 were

and five years later submitted a value engin- improperly retained by the unit.

eering change proposal (VECP) for a savings ofhalf the original cost of the test equipment. As a result of an investigation, three individuals

Following negotiations with the contractor, the were issued non punitive letters of caution and

4-2

the major command took action to revise and the military. A second officer was made to forfeitstrengthen supply procedures. (89-T-45485) one-third of one month's pay. The enlisted

service member was reduced in rank, made toAuxiliary Power Units forfeit $466, and was separated from the

military. The enlisted individual's commandingA military command purchased new auxiliary officer was counseled. (89-T-46008)power units (APU) when the cylinders on air-cooled diesel engines became worn, although a SPECIAL INQU I RI ESworn APU could be reclaimed and madeserviceable for $200. IG, I)oi)

An investigation revealed that it was command Special Inquiries handles cases referred bypolicy to purchase new APU for $6,065 each congressional or D)oD officials which oftenwhen the cylinders became worn and suggestions involve sensitive departmental issues.to sleeve the engines were disapproved. Onlythe engine block costing $458 needed to be During the reporting period, lol) Directivereplaced. 7050.6, "M ilitary Whistleblower Protection,"

which implements the 1988 changes to Title 10,As a result of the investigation, future repairs United States Code, Section 1034, was publishedwill be accomplished by purchasing engine and distributed to the Services and other Dol)blocks in lieu of APU replacement, resulting in a components.savings of $39,200. The Hotline caller receivedan award for the suggestion. (89-T-45522) Special Inquiries opened 92 cases and closed 109

during the period.Computer Theft

Significant CasesA Dol) employee altered purchase documentsand stole computer equipment valued at $6,000. Fuel Oil PreheatersA joint investigation by the Federal Bureau ofInvestigation and the CIDC revealed that the A company installed fuel oil preheaters at astolen equipment was sold for $400 and ten military installation in an effort to reducequarter-gram packets of heroin. consumption of #2 fuel oil in base housing units.

The equipment was recovered and the An inquiry revealed that contract specifications

Government employee was charged with were inadequate and not properly enforced.larceny. The employee was barred from future Substitute brand preheaters did not meetGovernment employment for life, sentenced to contractual performance and safetyone year in jail (suspended), three years' requirements, and the cognizant Militaryprobation and paid $2,600 in restitution. Two Service IG failed to be forthright in responding toother subjects were sentenced to two years in jail, the allegations.three years' probation and paid $2,600 inrestitution. (88-T-4391 5) The investigators recommended that the

preheaters be removed from the housing units,Fraternization, Sexual Misconduct that no Government funds be expended to repair,

replace, or add new preheaters, and that theA military enlisted person was allowed Service file a claim against the contractor. Theunauthorized plane trips during duty hours, investigators also recommended that the Serviceunnecessary training, lightduty or free time off 10s he cautioned on the need to be forthright infrom duty, and attended college full time on an responding to complainants.early out program while still on active duty. Theprivileges were permitted by several military Military Vehiclesofficers in return for sexual intimacy.

It was alleged that l)oI) policies governingA senior officer was issued a letter of reprimand, disposal of surplus military vehicles resulted in amade to forfeit $1,800, and was separated from significant waste of Government resources

4-3

Surplus M 151 quarter ton trucks (jeeps) were use civilian duty hours to conduct militarycrushed or used as firing targets rather than reserve business, to the detriment of the civilianbeing sold. component. The official collected civilian and

reserve pay for the same hours of work andInvestigators determined that the current earned substantial amounts of money andpolicies best serve the public interest. The sale of retirement points as a reservist throughthe surplus jeeps to the puhlic would degrade questionable personal allocation of active dutyhighway safety. The use o,^ Lhe vehicles as training funds.targets when they were worth only scrap valuewas economically justified. The official's supervisor neglected to monitor the

employee's attendance. The civilian componentThe investigators recommended that the Army used contractor personnel to solve manpowerreuse the M 151 components before transferring shortage problems, improperly performed staffthe vehicles to the Defense Reutilization and functions and had inappropriate access toMarketing Offices. The Army concurred. classified and privileged information.

Abuse of Civilian Position The investigators recommended appropriatepersonnel actions against the civilian official and

A GM-15 civilian official spent duty time the supervisor. They also recommended that theconducting military reserve business. The official reimburse the Government for duty notallegation was previously substantiated. A performed and for expenses rclated to militaryrequest to reinvestigate the issue was made reserve duties. The investigators recommendedbecause no corrective action was taken. that the Service review the official's conduct to

determine suitability for a military reserveInvestigators found that. the official continued to leadership position.

4-4

CHAPTER 5 focused on recommendations from a 1986 Dol)

study and assessed the management

infrastructure, planning, funding and operation

INSPECTIONS of the passenger airlift system.

The inspectors found that the DoI) studyrecommendations were implemented and the

This chapter contains inspection information system was working well. The management offrom the Assistant Inspector General for commercial passenger operations, however, isInspections (AIG-INS) and the inspectors not cost effective. The problems found were basicgeneral organizations of the Army, Navy and Air management and fiscal policy issues such as:Force.

oInconsistent policies and proceduresThe AIG-INS performs organizational and causing Airlift Service Industrial Fund (ASIF)functional inspections that are broad in scope liquidity problems.and that seek to identify systemic andmanagement problems. The inspections give the o Inadequate ASIF revenue and collectionSecretary of Defense, Assistant Secretaries and procedures.Directors of Defense Agencies a balanced look atthe effectiveness of an organization or program. oFailure to establish and follow proceduresThe Military Department and Defense Agency for billing and collecting from paying customersinspectors general spend most of their time and by the Military Airlift Command.resources on the traditional inspection roles of:

o Inaccurate forecasting of user@Performing unit and functional-oriented requirements.

inspections that examine a command or activityin order to evaluate matters affecting mission Department managers agreed with theperformance. recommended corrective actions. (OAIG-INS)

i Conducting investigations and inquiries Washington Headquarters Servicesinto matters of a noncriminal nature, such asfailure to follow regulations, improper command An inspecion of the Washington I leadquartersinfluence or personal impropriety. Services (WIIS) assessed the efficiency and

effectiveness of resource management andMediating between a complainant and the customer service in the National Capital Region.

chain of command to resolve minor problems andgrievances. The inspectors found problems in the following

areas.eConducting specialized reviews, such as

aircraft accident investigations. oOrganizational Structure - Poor safety andoccupational health planning; excessive use of

The activities of the inspection organizations for overtime, fragmentation, duplication andevaluating program economy, efficiency and overlap within the elements of the l)oD buildingeffectiveness and for preventing fraud, waste and administration, and weakened internalmismanagement are included in this chapter. management controls. The WIIS took correctiveThe traditional military inspectors general roles action.are not.

o Budget and Financial Accounting -Significant Inspections Untimely, inaccurate documents received from

disbursing offices; erroneous recording ofCommercial Passenger Airlift Operations transactions; unmanageable backlog in

I accounting and financial management services;An inspection evaluated the Dol) management of incomplete support document files, inadequatecommercial passenger airlift operations. It internal controls, and insufficient staffing

5-1

TheWl IS agreed to place more emphasis on these Management Support Activities (MSA)items.

The DoI) inspection of the Office of the SecretaryLogistical Support -There was a lack of of Defense (OSD) found that the use of MSA has

controls over reporting Contracted Advisory and grown dramatically and the personnel employedAssistance Services (CAAS) requirements and in the MSA are inappropriately accounted for asduplication of services provided by the Defense Defense Logistics Agency (DlA) resources.Supply Service-Washington. The WHS tookaction to improve CAAS reporting requirements The dual responsibility for the MSA (OS) hasand appointed a CAAS point of contact. The operational control and the )ILA providesWIIS disagreed that logistical support services administrative support) contributed to laxare duplicative. The disagreement will be management and ineffective OSD oversight andresolved through the AIG-AFU resolution enforcement of policy. The inspectors estimatedprocess. that nearly 200 spaces can be eliminated in the

MSA without degrading the OSD mission.PAdministrative Services -A directives

management program had not been established The inspectors recommended that the MSA beto ensure timely, well-coordinated and current properly accounted for as OSD headquartersdirectives. The WHS is developing an automated staff or OSD headquarters support activitiesinformation system to provide statistical and under the administrative support of the Director,managerial reports to improve the coordination WI IS and that the OS) proponents conduct aprocess and to refine the policy and procedural detailed review of manpower requirements andguidance. (OAIG-INS) management controls for their MSA.

Security Research Organizations The inspected activities agreed to properlyaccount for the MSA and to conduct manpower

An inspection evaluated the effectiveness of reviews to determine appropriate manningresearch missions and determined measures levels, but they nonconcurred with the proposedtaken to correct security research deficiencies realignment to the WHIS. The issues are beingidentified by the l)ol) Security Review (Stilwell) pursued through Defense Management ReportCommission in its report, "Keeping the Nation's initiatives. (OAIG-INS)Secrets," November 19, 1985.

SecurityThe )ol) had taken many positive actions tocorrect deficiencies in security research. The A followup inspection was conducted to assessinspectors found, however, that the Dol) Security progress made in the security arena since aInstitute was unable to perform the research previous 1986 inspection resulting from thefunctions envisioned in its charter. Problems Stilwell Commission Review. The inspectionwere also found with the DoD policy, found that security deficiencies identified by themanagement oversight and requirements Stilwell Commission and the 1986 inspectiondetermination process. still exist. There is a lack of command emphasis

due to unclear Army policies and untrainedThe inspectors recommended that a collateral duty personnel have assumed thecomprehensive regulation be developed to correct responsibility for security management. Thethe scope, funding and management of the Stilwell Commission issued 63 recommendationssecurity research identified in the Stilwell to improve security. The Army has implementedCommission report, and that l)ol) pursue efforts 41 without increased resources, thus strainingto justify funding to implement the Stilwell the system. The inspection found that:Commission recommendation for aclearinghouse, focal point and center to sponsor Corrective actions in program managementand coordinate security research ofall I)ol) have translated into new requirements on papercomponents. (OAIG-INS . without the needed resources. The Commands

5-2

are not conducting oversight inspections to level, where the program suffers from lack ofensure that new requirements are implemented, command emphasis, competing priorities,

limited resources and perceived absence of a'he Army automation security program for threat. Personnel remain at high risk due to

the small computer environment has made little ignorance of program requirements, flawedimprovement since 1986. implementation of physical security regulation

requirements and fragmented guidance becauseWFailure to implement the system to assess procedures are not in place to provide for

the trustworthiness of personnel has made consolidated funding. (Army)personnel security vulnerable..

Maintenance ReadinessOl'he Army information security is in a

better condition, but vulnerablities in program A major command conducted a special inspectionmanagement and security education exist. revealing that units were not performing(Army) maintenance to required technical standards.

The substandard performance was due to theCombatting Terrorism difference in priorities assigned to maintenance

programs and the capability of unit commandersA followup inspection found that since the 1986 to support the assigned priority effectively withinspection, the Army has improved its overall resources. The following are problem areas:capability to cope with the terrorist threat as aresult of headquarters, major command and unit WPreventive maintenance checks andinitiatives. The Army, however, has not fully services were lacking. Approximately 38 percentimplemented or institutionalized its program for of the equipment inspected was not missioncombatting terrorism below the headquarters capable.

Both conventional and special operations forces, such as this Navy SEAL, have roles in making terrorism more costl" for those

nations that support it. (DoD photo)

5-3

Commanders and maintenance managersreacted to maintenance problems instead ofmanaging the maintenance program because ofinsufficient resources to do both.

o Maintenance training was lacking, -.-

resulting in mechanics rarely receiving trainingon job-related skills. (Army).

Hazardous Material and Hazardous WasteManagement

The inspection evaluated current Armyprocedures to acquire, transport and trackhazardcus material and to dispose of hazardouswaste. The inspection found that managementof hazardous items requires a coordinated staffeffort, but no such centrally coordinated effortexists. None of the installations visited duringthe inspection totally complied with federal andstate law. Because the Army has nocomprehensive strategy and methodology fordealing with hazardous waste, installations lackconsolidated training programs that outlineresponsibilities, requirements and standards.The Defense Reutilization and Marketing Offices An A rmy depot where the chenmical agents inutions disposal

have difficulty providing contract hazardous system is located. (Dol) photo)

waste disposal service to Reserve Componentunits. The Army generally does well identifying,controlling and tracking hazardous waste, but Other Army Inspectionsdoes not track, control and manage hazardousmaterial on Army facilities. Many initiatives In addition to the Army inspections above, theare underway at all Army echelons, but central following is a list of other significant inspectionsmanagement is needed to ensure success. (Army) completed during the period:

Quality Assurance and Quality Control of aFollowup Inspection on MobilizationConstruction

a Special Inspection Concerning Fraud,The Corps of Engineers conducted a followup Waste and Abuseinspection that revealed there was significantprogress since the initial 1986 inspection. eSpecial Inspection of TrainingQuality assurance regulations and guidance Managementhave been updated and rewritten and in mostinstances were being followed. Significant s Special Inspection of Army Reserve Centerimprovements were noted in contract Processing of Utility Billspreparation, quality assurance execution andcontract administration. A customer survey, a Followup Inspection of Contractingfocusing on construction quality and personnel Functionsinvolvement with contractor evaluations, designreview and warranty planning was conducted @Special Inspection of Combat Support andconcurrently with the inspection. The survey Combat Service Support Training Programsindicated that continued emphasis in the citedareas was needed as well as renewed emphasis in aSpecial Inspection of Enlisted Trainingconstruction design. (Army) Management

5-4

Environmental Program Government to payments for services neverreceived.

An inspection of the Naval Shipyard at PugetSound evaluated the effectiveness of the Navy's oFailure to perform rate comparisons of nextIIazardous Waste Program. The shipyard's day air carriers which resulted in overpayments.relationship with state and federal regulatoryagencies was open and active; however, failure to FUse of next (lay and second day air servicecorrect administrative deficiencies and fully when ground service provided the same deliveryimplement environmental program schedule at a fraction of SWT costs.requirements could result in future citations anda deterioration in cooperation. Procedural recommendations were made to

ensure that material reaches the intendedSignificant problems were noted in consignee by the most economical mode andimplementing the Installation Restoration carrier. (Navy)Program and the Ilazardous Waste Program.The Naval Sea Systems Command has not Naval Facilities Engineering Commandprovided sufficient on-site assistance or central (NAVFACENGCOM)oversight to facilitate remediation of theshipyard's environmental problems. (Navy) Overseas construction by SEABEE Battalions in

FY 1988 resulted in a $50 million cost avoidance.Naval Hospital, Groton, CT Stateside SEABEE self-help in FY 1988

achieved a $7.1 million labor cost avoidance. TheAn investigation of the hospital found that Navy Industrial Improvement Programbeneficiaries consider the quality of care to be initiatives implemented at a Public Worksexcellent. The program that assists beneficiaries Center (PWC) in Norfolk and eight other PWC,in locating medical services not available at the saved an average of $73.5 million in FY 1987 andhospital has over 200 local providers enrolled. 1988Health screening programs for active dutymembers and civilian employees are well- The inspectors found the NAVFACENGCOMmanaged and the credentialing and quality failed to:assurance programs function well.

comply with the Navy policy of separationThe following were areas of concern: the absence of functions, resulting in non-warrantedof obstetric care, the quality of life for hospital personnel outside the contracting organizationcorpsmen assigned to bachelor enlisted quarters performing contracting functions,and construction problems that affect thedelivery of quality care. (Navy) oconduct Navy-directed reviews of proposed

federal, state and local laws and regulations,Transportation Operations

ocomply with Navy policy on management ofAn inspection of the Naval Supply Center, computer hardware and software programs,Pensacola, FL, found problems with the center'smanagement of the carrier selection process. establish an effective system to review andThe lack of control over transportation approv%, facility designs involving hazardousexpenditures resulted in a negative impact on wast,:,obligation of Service-wide transportation (SWT)funds. Significant deficiencies included: ocarry out its duties as the Navy program

manager for the T)ol) Installation RestorationFailure to update the Navy Automated Program in a timely manner, and

Transportation Document System address filewhich resulted in misdirected shipments. orequire architect and engineer contractors

to site-adapt existing designs for similaroLack of accountability and control of requirements at follow on sites, which could save

Government Bills of Lading which exposed the almost $51 million annually. (Navy)

5-5

Area Visit to Port Hueneme and Point acquisition or central contracting. EvaluationsMugu, CA were made on the effectiveness and timeliness of

the documentjustification and approval process,The focus of the visit was to review quality of life pursuit of competition for the sake ofcompetitionprograms and physical security. The inspection and actions required to improve the effectivenessfound insufficient and inadequate military of competition. (Air Force)housing; the waiting period for on-base housingfor married personnel is very long; and the Air Force Intelligence Trainingbarracks at Port II ueneme are inadequate due toelectrical power shortages, undependable The effectiveness of intelligence training inplumbing and heating, and poor roofing, flashing preparing officer and enlisted personnel toand paint. Poor administration of the support the operational mission of the Air ForceCIIAMIPUS program resulted in a near was evaluated. The inspection team assessed thebreakdown of the payment process, causing existing intelligence training structuresevere dissatisfaction by providers and including intelligence technical training atbeneficiaries. (Navy) Goodfellow and Lowry Air Force Bases, major

commands' formal courses, and formal andOther Navy Inspections informal on-the-job training. The relationship

and activities of national agencies and majorIn addition to the Navy inspections above, the commands relative to the training programsfollowing is a list of other significant inspections were also assessed. (Air Force)completed during the period:

Other Air Force Inspections@Naval I lospital, Jacksonville, FL

In addition to the Air Force inspections above,a Naval Hospital, Millington, TN the following is a list of other significant

inspections completed during the period:i Naval Air Station, Glenview

&SAMI of Award Fee ContractingaInventory Accuracy

'Functional Management Inspection (FM!)sNavy Space Systems Activity of Training and Use of Enlisted Information

Managers&Naval Ilospital, Keflavik, Iceland

a FMI of the Base Individual Mobilization'San Diego ADI)P Area Review Augmentee Administrator Program

Night Vision Goggles ' Uniformed Services Voluntary InsuranceProgram (US VIll)

Inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of thenight vision goggle program. The inspection eAeromedical Evacuation Systemcovered the following major aspects of theprogram: the acquisition process, initial and i FMI of the Decentralized Contractingcurrency training for aircrews, maintainability Initiativeand supportability, capabilities and limitations,and safety. (Air Force) 'Quick Look FMI of Air Base Operability

Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) I'MI of Air Force Administration of theCivil Air Patrol

A systems acquisition management inspection(SAMI) assesssed the implementation of CICA at 'Multi-Major Command Inspection ofthe Air Force Systems Command, Air Force Elmendorf Air Force BaseLogistics Command and Air ForceCommunications Command. The inspection 'Multi Major Command Inspection of Royalconcentrated on CICA procedures on systems Air Force Mildenhall

5-6

from 1984 to 1988 (during the period almost $2.9CHAPTER6 million in assets were dissipated), and

the renovation and construction of theOfficers Club where an $8.3 million cost overrunLEGISLATIVE was never reported to the Secretary of the Air

TESTIMONY AND Force or the Congress.

The testimony highlighted the apparent lack ofP O internal controls and managerial accountability

at Ramstein to ensure prudent use of NCO assetsand a need to establish procedures for reportingsubstantial cost growth in construction projects.

Congressional Testimony Problems in the !)ol) Supply System

Navy Procurement Practices on AI)P The Senate Government Affairs Committee heldEquipment hearings on this subject during the past few

years. The latest hearing was on March 6, 1990.On November 8, 1989, the Deputy Inspector The Inspector General agreed with theGeneral testified before the Ilouse Committee on Committee premise that serious problems existGovernment Operations, Subcommittee on in the supply system. The IG pointed out thatLegislation and National Security regarding the growth in inapplicable inventory, depotalleged improprieties in awarding Navy A I)P overcrowding and a high incidence of inventorycontracts to the IBM Corporation. A group of six reporting errors indicated a need forIBM competitors stated that they could not improvement in each aspect of supply operations.compete fairly with IBM if 1BM continued to use The IG stressed the importance oftop levelunfair practices to obtain Navy contracts. The attention to supply management improvement,IG, l)oD, review of one Navy ADP contract particularly as )oI) enters a period ofdetermined that IBM improperly advised the restructuring and drawdown. The 10 cautionedNavy on how to develop the specifications and that declining demand was likely to result inhow to use 8(a) firms to avoid competition and even larger excess inventories in the near term.lengthy procurement procedures. The GAO Aggressive management action is needed toconducted an audit on similar Navy reverse the trend.procurements and determined similar unfairpractices by I1M. The Deputy Inspector General Lessons Learned from "Illwind"recommended reducing the use of"brand nameor equal" specifications, using 8(a) contractors as On March 21, 1990, the IG testified before theprocuring brokers and restricting vendor Senate Committee on Armed Services,training for preparing contract award factors. Subcommittee on Defense Industry and

Technology regarding lessons learned from theClub Operations at Ramstein Air Base recent procurement fraud investigations. The IG

stated that while the Illwind investigation isThe Deputy Inspector General testified before a important, it is only a small part of the Dol)Subcommittee of the I louse Armed Services investigative effort. Illwind revealed widespreadCommittee on November 16, 1989, regarding: trafficking in restricted information, bribes and

improper gratuities, but it did not indicate thethe breakdown of the Air Force Morale, source selection process was flawed. The IG also

Welfare and Recreation System in identifying stressed that current law and regulation,and correcting severe mismanagemetit and combined with the patchwork of ethicsfinancial manipulation of the Noncommissioned legislation, enabled the I)ol) to detect andOfficer's Open (NCO) Mess assets at the base prosecute improper behavior.

6-1

Positions on Proposed Legislation 10 U.S.C. 2306a and 10 U.S.C. 2313(a). Neitherclearly defines a contract audit or makes

Investigative Authorities reference to the Government AuditingStandards as the basis for determining the

The IG, l)oD, has consistently supported full law records required fcr an audit.enforcement authority for the criminalinvestigators. Two bills were introduced during The 1)CAA will have difficulty in effectively andthe reporting period to provide additional efficiently accomplishing its mission unless it isinvestigative tools. Senator Rudy Boschwitz given timely access to contractor records andintroduced S. 2080 which authorizes reports. Access to contractor internal auditinvestigators to obtain and execute search and reports by the I)CAA would help to reducearrest warrants, serve subpoenas and excessive and duplicative audit coverage ofsummonses, and carry and use firearms. A contractors.companion bill, H.R. 4149 was introduced in theIlouse. There has been no further action on these The present legislation is outdated and needs tobills as of this date. be revised. A suggested revision to subsections

(a) and (d) of section 2313 of 10, U.S.C. is:Foreign Audit Equity

2313. Examination of books and records ofAnother legislative item of interest to the IG is contractorII.R. 4131, the "Foreign Contracting AuditEquity Act of 1990." The bill was introduced by (a) An agency named in section 2302 ofChairman Conyers in response to the November this title is entitled, through an authorized21, 1989, hearing before the House Government representative, to inspect the plant and audit orOperations Subcommittee on Legislation and examine the books, records, documents, andNational Security which focused on the IG, DoD, other evidence and accounting procedures andaudit report 89-090, "Field Pricing Support and practices of--Postaward Audits of Contracts with ForeignCompanies." The legislation states that, "an (1) a contractor performing anexecutive agency shall include in each incentive, cost reimbursement, time andsolicitation of bids or proposals for a covered materials, labor hour, or price redeterminablecontract specifications which require that the contract (or any combination of these) made byagency and its authorized representatives are that agency under this chapter andentitled to inspect the plant and audit the booksand records of each foreign contractor under the (2) a subcontractor performing anycovered contract." The legislative intent is to subcontract under an incentive, costensure that Memorandums of Understanding reimbursement, time and materials, labor hour,with foreign contractors are not written to or price redeterminable contract (or anypreclude the audit of contractor records by l)oD combination of these) made by that agency underauditors. this chapter.

Recommendations for Congressional The authorized representative performing anAction audit or examination in accordance with a

provision of law, a contractual provision or aDCAA Access to Records regulation of the agency shall have the right to

examine sufficient competent evidential matter,Legislation should be introduced to provide regardless of form through inspection,contract auditors with the authority to obtain observation, inquiry and confirmation that arethose contractor records required to comply with necessary to comply with the GovernmentGovernment Auditing Standards issued by the auditing standards established by theComptroller General ofthe United States. The Comptroller General of the United States fortwo contract clauses covering access by the audits of Governmental organizations,I)CAA to contractors' records are based on programs, activities, and functions.

6-2

(d)(1) The Director of the Defense from Truth in Negotiations Act coverage. A 1987Contract Audit Agency (or any successor agency) study by this office disclosed that the amount ofmay require by subpoena the production of defective pricing found by auditors in contractsbooks, documents, papers, or records access to in the $100,000 to $500,000 range was higher, aswhich is provided to the Secretary of Defense or a percentage of contract value, than in any otherthe contracting officer by a provision of law, a contract value range. We are not aware of anycontractual provision, or a regulation of the indications that the incidence of defective pricingAgency. has declined.

I)efense Management Report Legislative The Congress found insufficient merit inInitiatives assertions made by the DoI) in 1983 that the

$100,000 threshold put an unreasonable burdenThe Secretary of I)cfense submitted the proposed on contractors and DoD contracting personnel."Defense Management Improvement Act" to the In our view, no one has yet demonstrated thatCongress on April 5, 1990. The IG, I)oD, the preparation of cost or pricing data, whichsupports every initiative in the proposal must be compiled routinely during theassociated with the Defense Management Report preparation of a proposal package, causes undueexcept the proposed increase in the threshold for additional work load. In addition, we are notsubmission of certified contractor cost and aware of any analyses indicating that thepricing data. The industry letter supporting the proposed change would be cost beneficial for theproposal infers that it is nothing more than a Government.long overdue adjustment for inflation. In fact,the Congress raised the threshold from $100,000to $500,000 in 1981, but decided thereafter that Congressional Correspondencethe increase was not in the best interest of theGovernment and returned the threshold in 1985 At the end of the last reporting period, the IGto the original level. The proposal would reverse established a new system to track congressionala fairly recent congressional action. correspondence and to ensure consistency in

information provided to the Congress. A total ofThe congressional action to reinstate the 120 congressional inquiries were received during$100,000 threshold was based on the fact that this period. The IG opened 115 cases, most beingdefective pricing was too high to justify procurement or personnel problems, and 73 wereexempting a large percentage of I)oD contracts completed and closed.

6-3

APPEND)IX A

DOD Audit, Inspectionand Investigative Organizations

SECRETIARYOF

D)EFENSE

MI LITARY INSPECTOR Comptroller IOTH ERI)EPAR'PMENTrs GENERAL DEFENSE

DOD) DEFENSE AGENCIES*CONTRACT

AU)IT AGENCY

-------------- ------------------ ------------------Army Criminal Army Audit Agency :Army

Investigation Command 'Naval Audit Service NavyNaval Investigative Service Air Force Audit Agency Air ForceCommand A rmy/A ir Force Marine Corps

Air Force Office of Special Exchange Service -------------Investigations

TOTIAL AUD)IT, INSPECTION, D~efense agencies reportdirectly to theAND IN VESTIGATI VE PERSONNEL Deputy Secretary of Defense or through an

Under SecretaryrAsitn21,901yorAssatS

rr.

A-1

ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONSOF THE IG, DoD

Secretary of Defense

I

Inspector General

Deputy Inspector General

Assistant Assistant Assistant Assistant

Inspector General Inspector General Inspector General Inspector General

for for for for

Auditing Inspections Analysis and Special Programs

Followup

(AIG-AUD) (AIG.INS) (AIG-AFU) (AIG.SP)

Audits the DoD, including the Conducts inspections of DoD Facilitates resolution of disputed Operates the DoD Hotline forOSD, the JCS, the Unified and agencies worldwide. Assesses audit reports. Ensures that reporting fraud, waste, abuseSpecified Commands and the management efficiency, econ- agreed-upon actions are taken on and mismanagement. ProvidesDefense Agencies. Conducts omy of operations and comp- DoD audits, inspections and GAO a Special Inquiry capability.DoD-wide audits, audits of more liance with laws and directives, reports. Ensures that DoD'sthan one component and audits Emphasizes the detection and responses to GAO audits are ofrequested by the Secretary of prevention of fraud and waste. high quality. Leads OIG externalDefense or by the 1G. Operates coordination and reportingthrough a headquarters element activities with emphasis onand audit field offices, management improvement

initiatives.

Assistant Assistant Assistant Assistant

Inspector General Inspector General Inspector General Inspector General

for for for for

Investigations/ Audit Policy Administration Criminal Investigations

Dir., Defense Criminal and Oversight and Information Policy and Oversight

Investigative Service Management

(AIG-INV/DIR-DCIS) (AIG-APO) (AIG-A&IM) (AIG-CIPO)

Investigates major theft, fraud Reviews DoD internal and contract Provides financial management, Reviews DoD criminal investi-and corruption in the procurement audit organization operations information resources management, ative organization operations.process. Operates through a Establishes internal and contract personnel and security, and adminis- Establishes policy, emphasizingheadquarters element, field audit policy. Evaluates the effec- trative support to the IG, DoD. policies and procedures thatoffices and resident agencies. tiveness of audit organizations adversely affect criminal prose.

and their implementation of and cutions or civil and administrativeadherence to auditing standards, remedies. Evaluates the effective-policies and procedures. ness of criminal investigative

organizations and their imple-mentation of and adherence tostandards, policies and procedures.

Director Director

Regional Office Performs designated representative iunctions Regional Office

Pacific directed oy the IG on the audit, investigation, Europeinspection and special programs missions of theOG, DoD, in Europe or the Pacific, as appropriate.

(IGRO-PAC) (IGRO-EUR)

A-2

PERSONNEL ON BOARDAUDIT, INSPECTION AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES

(For the 6 month Period Ending March 31,1990)

There is a misperception that all personnel in the table below oversee the acquisition process. Infact, only the DCAA portion of contract audit and the DCIS portion of the IG, DoD, predominatelyaddress contractor activities. Most of the personnel working for the other organizations areconcerned with internal DoD oversight matters.

Organization Personnel on Board

IG, Dol) 1,503Contract Audit 6,936Service Audit 4,195Service Inspection 3,551Service Inv,.stigation 5,716

Total 21,901

OPERATING COSTSAUDIT, INSPECTION AND INVESTIGATIVE ACTIVITIES

(For the 6.month Period Ending March 31, 1990)

Operating Costs(S in millions)

Function _____

Civilian Military Travel Other Total

AuditInternal Audit $64.3 $6.7 $6.8 $4.7 $82.5Internal Review 27.9 3.1 1.0 1.1 33.1Military Exchange Audit 1.9 .1 .4 .0 2.4Contract Audit 147.2 0.0 9.0 18.3 174.5

Total $241.3 $9.9 $17.2 $24.1 $292.5

Inspection $15.7 $79.2 $8.5 $5.9 $109.3

Investigation $79.5 $53.7 $7.8 $27.2 $168.2

Total Operating Costs $336.5 $142.8 $33.5 $57.2 $570.0

A-3

COMPARISON OF OVERSIGHT RESOURCESWITH COVERAGE RESPONSIBILITIES

AUDIT, INSPECTION AND INVESTIGATIVE PERSONNEL

" CONTRACT AUDITORS -- 6,200

" INTERNAL AUDITORS -- 4,200

* INVESTIGATORS -- 4,700

* INSPECTORS -- 3,200

THEIR COVERAGE AREA:

DOI) PEOPLE

* 5 million, inbluding active duty service members, civilian employeesand Reserve forces

PLACES

* 1,200 + military installations and properties

@ 21 countries and 20 U.S. territories

THINGS

* 591 major combatant and support ships

* 3,977 strategic and tactical aircraft

* $776.8 billion in real and personal property

DOLLARS

* $294.9 billion estimated FY 1989 outlays

CONTRACTORS

* 35,000 Defense contractors

* 110,000 locations

* 3.3 million Defense contractor employees

A-4

APPENI)IX B

Legislative Reporting Requirements

Public Law Reporting Requirement SemiannualReport

Sec. 5(a)(1) A Description of Significant Problems, Abuses, Chapters 1, 2,3,5P.L. 95-452 and Deficiencies Disclosed During theas amended Reporting Period

Sec. 5(a)(2) A Description of Recommendations for Chapter 1P.L. 95-452 Corrective Action Made with Respect to Suchas amended Significant Problems, Abuses, or Deficiencies

Sec. 8(f)(1) Numbers and Types of Contract Audits Chapter 2P.L. 95-452as amended

Sec. 5(a)(4) A Summary of Matters Referred for Prosecution Chapter 3P.L. 95-452 and the Results of Such Prosecutionsas amended

Sec. 4(a)(2) Review of Legislation and Directives Chapter 6P.L. 95-452as amended

Sec. 5,a)(6) A Listing Subdivided According to Subject Appendix CP.L. 95-452 Matter of Each Audit Report Issued by the Appendix Das amended Office During the Reporting Period and where

Applicable the Total Dollar Value of QuestionedCosts and the Dollar Value of Recommendationsthat Funds be Put to Better Use

Sec. 5(a)(7) A Summary of Each Particularly Chapter 1IA.L.95-452 Significant Reportas amended

Sec. 5(a)(8)(9) Statistical Tables by Status Showing the Total Chapter 1P.L. 95-452 Number of Audit Reports Issued, the Total Dollaras amended Value of Associated Questioned Costs, the Dollar

Value of Recommendations that Funds be Put toBetter Use, and the Report Decision Status

Sec. 5(b)(2)(3)(4) Statistical Tables Showing the Status of Chapter IP.L. 95-452 Management Corrective Action on Agreed. uponas amended Audit Recommendations

B-1

Sec. 5(a)(10)( 11)(12) Summary of Overage Undecided Audits, Chapter 1P.L. 95-452 Significant Revised Management Decisions,as amended and Significant Management Decisions with

which the Inspector General is in Disagreement

Sec. 5(a)(5) A Summary of Each Report Made to theIP.L. 95-452 Secretary of Defense by the Inspector Generalas amended of Instances when Information or Assistance was

Unreasonably Refused or Not Provided(During the reporting period, the IG, DoD, has not beenunreasonably refused or denied access to information.)

B-2

APPENDIX C

Audit Reports

This listing includes audit reports issued by the Department of Defense central auditorganizations -- Assistant Inspector General for Auditing, Army Audit Agency, Naval AuditService, Air Force Audit Agency -- but does not include internal review reports, militaryexchange audit reports or reports prepared by contract audit activities.

ASSISTANi' 90.009 Defense Logistics 90-018 Pricing of IndefiniteINSPECTOR Agency Commercial Activities Delivery Contract N00019-84-GENERAL FOR Program (11/7/89) D-0176 (12/15/89)AUITING, I)ol)

90-010 Summary Report 90-019 Naval Militaryon the Audits of Contract Personnel Command (NMPC)

90-001 User Charges and Terminations (11/21/89) Planned Procurement ofResource Management at Automated Data ProcessingMajor Range and Test 90-011 Charge-Back Equipment (12/15/89)Facilities (10/6/89) Accounting Systems for

the Cost of Information 90-020 Defense Nuclear90-002 Acquisition of the M9 Technology Resources Agency Activities at JohnstonArmored Combat Earthmover (11/28/89) Atoll (12/15/89)Program (10/6/89)

90-012 Primary Care for 90-021 Acquisition of the90-003 Managementof Special Uniformed Services (PRIMUS) Heavy Expanded MobilityAccess Programs at the and Navy Cares (NAVCARE) Tactical Truck (12/26/89)Defense Intelligence Agency Programs (12/6/89)(10/16/89) 90-022 Pricing of Subcontract(CLASSIFIED) 90-013 Administration of Awarded to Aircraft Porous

Contractor Rental of I)oD Media, Incorporated, by Boeing90-004 Management of Special Plant Equipment at Boeing Vertol Company for PrimeAccess Programs at the II elicopters (12/6/89) Contract N 0001 9-83-C-03 11Defense Communications (12/28/89)Agency (10/16/89) 90-014 Moore's Cafeteria(CLASSIFIED) Services, Inc., Food Services 90-023 Pricing of Contract

Contract (12/7/89) N00383-82-C- 1017 at Aircraft90-005 Requirements Porous Media, IncorporatedValidation for 90-015 Quick-Reaction Report (12/28/89)Telecommunications Services on the Audit of the Defense(10/16/89) Environmental Restoration 90-024 Pricing of Subcontract

Fund (12/13/89) Awarded to Aircraft Porous90-006 Dol) l)omestic Media, Incorporated, by PrattTechnology Transfer Program 90-016 Pricing of Subcontract and Whitney Aircraft Group(10/19/89) Awarded to Aircraft Porous for Prime Contract F33657-83-

Media, Incorporated, by C-2221 (12/28/89)90-007 I lotline Allegation on Northrup Corporation forthe Misappropriation and Prime Contract N00019-83-C- 90-025 Fiscal Year 1989Augmentation of Funds by the 0272 (12/15/89) Evaluation of theU.S. Army Corps of Engineers Implementation of the Federal(10/31/89) 90-017 Pricing of Contract Managers' Financial Integrity

N00383-82-C- 1023 at Aircraft Act of 1982 at the On-90-008 Disposal of Recyclable Porous Media, Incorporated Site Inspection AgencyMaterials (10/31/89) (12/15/89) (12/28/89)

C-1

90-026 Surcharge Rate Process 90-036 Defense Advanced 90-047 Fiscal Year 1989for the Defense Stock Fund Language and Area Studies Evaluation of the(12/26/89) Program (2/15/90) Inplementation of the Federal

Managers' Financial Integrity90-027 Management and 90-037 Pricing of Contract Act of 1982 at the U.S. AtlanticAdministration of Quality I)AMD17-85-C-5138 at Command (3/12/90)Assurance for Aircraft Telefactor CorporationMaintenance Contracts (2/20/90) 90-048 Administrative Control(12/26/89) of Funds - I londuras (3/19/90)

90-038 Recoupment of90-028 Acquisition and Transportation Costs Incurred 90-049 l)oD-Wide Audit of theManagement of Test Facilities on Foreign Military Sales Secure Terminal Unit-Illat l)oD Proving Grounds (2/23/90) Program (3/20/90)(12/26/89)

90-039 Procurement of a 90-050 Requirements for90-029 Foreign Military Sales Component Breakout Model by Wholesale Inventories toTrust Fund Disbursement the Air Force Aeronautical Support the Target AcquisitionReporting (12/29/89) Systems Division (2/23/90) Designation Sight/Pilot Night

Vision Sensor System (3/23/90)Unnumbered Summary 90-040 Wartime ExpansionReport on Audits of Contracted Capacity of Military I lospitals 90-051 Automated DataAdvisory and Assistance in CONUS (2/27/90) Processing Support ofServices Conducted During FY Investigative and Security1989 in Compliance with 90-041 Contracting Practices Missions at the DefenseU.S.C. Title 31 (1/2/90) of the Institute for Defense Investigative Service (3/29/90)

Analyses (3/1/90)90-030 Commercial Aviation 90-052 Stock Management atFuel Invoice Payments in 90-042 Acquisition the National SecurityAgencyEurope, (1/22/90) Management of the Small (3/30/90)

Waterplane Area Twin IIllI90-031 Materials Technology (SWATII) Ocean Surveillance 90-054 Intelligence Center,(1/25/90) Ships (T-AGOS) (3/1/90) Pacific (3/30/90)

90-032 Acquisition of an Army 90-043 PlantClearance ARMY AUI)ITI'Special Access Program Action on Government-Owned AGENCY(2/2/90) Property in the Possession of

Defense Contractors FORMAL REPORTS90-033 Competition in (3/2/90)Negotiated Procurements SW 90-004 Management of(2/9/90) 90-044 Pricing of Contract Hazardous Waste, Corpus

F09603-80-G-1840, Delivery Christi Army Depot, Corpus90-034 Contracting through Order SDIJ, at Aircraft Christi, TX (10/2/89)Interagency Agreements with Porous Media, Incorporatedthe Library of Congress (3/7/90) SO 90-800 Planning and(2/9/90) Budgeting for the Installation

90-045 Management of the Morale, Welfare and Recre-90-035 Followup Audit of Defense Logistics Agency's ation Fund, U.S. Army Infan-Vendor Technical Central Design Activity try Center and Fort Benning,Qualification Process for (3/7/90) Fort Benning, GA (10/9/89)Aircraft Engine Spare PartsProcured by the Naval 90-046 Military Airlift NE 90-001 InformationAviation Supply Office Command Air Passenger Management, Carlisle(2/14/90) Terminals (3/7/90) Barracks, Carlisle Barracks,

C-2

PA (10/9189) Division (Air Assault) and Ft. Medical Center, Aurora, CO

Campbell, Fort Campbell, KT (11/27/89)SW 90-002 Operational (10/27/89)Readiness at 11 th Air Defense N E 90-200 Tempest Protection

Artillery Brigade, U.S. Army EU 90-001 VII Corps Program, Tempest Risk

Air Defense Artillery Center Artillery, Augsburg, Germany Assessments (11/27/89)

and Fort Bliss, Fort Bliss, TX (10/30/89)(10/10/89) WE 90-201 Nontactical

NE 90-002 Information Vehicles, U.S. Army, Army

SW 90-003 Mobilization and Management, U.S. Army War Engineer Division, Pacific

Training, I leadquarters, U.S. College, Carlisle Barracks, PA Ocean, Fort Shafter, Ill

Army Garrison, Fort Sam (10/30/89) (11/28/89)1 !ouston, TX (10/10/89)

SO 90-002 Commissary WE 90-203 Reserve

EC 90-001 Information Operations, Fort Jackson, SC Component Pay Systems,

Management Program, U.S. (11/3/89) Washington Army National

Army Tank-Automotive Guard, Camp Murray, WA

Command, Warren, MI WE 90-001 Commissary (11/29/89)

t 10/ 11/89) Operations, Sagamihara,Japan (11/3/89) WE 90-202 Nontactical

EU 90-305 Implementation of Vehicles, U.S. Army Western

the Standard Army Automated SO 90-001 Contracting for Command, Fort Shafter, ItI

Contracting System, U.S. Direct lealth Care Providers (11/29/89)

Army Contracting Command, (11/6/89)Europe, I leidelberg, Germany SW 90-201 Prepositioned

(10/16/89) EU 90-002 Selected Medical War Reserves

Environmental Program, Program, U.S. Army Medical

WE 90-200 Prepositioned Pirmasens Military Coin- Department Activity,

Medical War Reserves, Tripler munity, Pirmasens, Germany Fort Ilood, TX

Army Medical Center, I 11 (11/6/89) (11/29/89)(1I0/17/89) SO 90-300 121st U.S. Army SW 90-001 Aviation

EC 90-003 Supply and Reserve Command, Intermediate Maintenance

Maintenance Operations, Fort Birmingham, AL, (11/6/89) Support, Ill Corps and Fort

Pickett, VA (10/1 7/89) flood, Fort flood, TX (12/4/89)NE 90-003 Acquisitions

EU 90-301 Installation Support Post Expansion, U.S. SW 90-800 Planning and

Materiel Maintenance Army Garrison, Fort Drum, Budgeting for the Installation,

Activities, VII Corps, NY (11/20/89) Morale, Welfare and

Stuttgart, Germany (10/25/89) Recreation Fund (12/4/89)EC 90-005 Electronic Infor-

MW 90-200 Reserve mation Delivery System, U.S. EC 90-006 U.S. Army

Component Pay Systems, Army Training Support Cen- Publications Distribution

Fourth U.S. Army, ",'ort ter, Fort Eustis, VA (11/21/89) Center-Baltimore, Baltimore,

Sheridan, IL (10/26/89) M D (12/7/89)SW 90-203 Family Housing,

MW 90-001 System Change U.S. Army Combined Arms EC 90-002 Property

Requests, U.S. Army Materiel Ceniew ±nd a .ot lravcnworth, Accoun.abi'ity Foirst U S

Command, Systems Integra- Fort Leavenworth, KS Army and Fort George G.

tion and Management Activity, (11/22/89) Meade, Fort George G. Meade,

St. Louis, MO (10/26/89) MI) (12/11/89)SW 90-200 Prepositioned

MW 90-003 Property Medical War Reserves SW 90-005 Regional Data

Accountability, 101st Airborne Program, Fitzsimons Army Center, Killeen, TX (12/12/89)

C-3

EU 90-302 Small Purchase HQ 90-200 Disability EC 90-004 Civil WorksProcedures, Regional Contract- Payments to Military Management, U.S. Armying Office, Stuttgart, Germany Personnel (12/27/89) Engineer Division, Ohio River,(12/15/89) Cincinnati, 0ll (1/25/90)

SO 90-203 NontacticalEU 90-303 Small Purchase Vehicles, U.S. Army Aviation NE 90-204 ReserveProcedures, Regional Contract- Cente, and Ft. Rucker, Fort Component Pay Systems,ing Office, Seckenheim, Rucker, AL (12/27/89) 77th U.S. Army ReserveGermany (12/15/89) Command, Fort 'otten, NY

SO 90-205 Reserve (1/25/90)NE 90-201 Quality of Component Pay Systems,Materiel, U.S. Army Puerto Rico Army National EC 90-009 Basis of Issue PlanCommunications-Electronic Guard, San Juan, Puerto Rico Management, U.S. ArmyCommand, Fort Monmouth, NJ (12/28/89) Training Support Center, Fort(12/15/89) Eustis, VA (1/25/90)

SW 90-202 Job OrderSW 90-006 Civilian Pay, III Contracting (12/29/89) WE 90-204 Civil WorksCorps and Fort Ilood, Fort Projects (1/29/90)Hlood, TX (12/21/89) WE 90-800 Amusement and

Vending Machines, National HQ 90-750 Payment to NorthEU 90-304 Small Purchase Training Center and Fort Dakota for Leasing of FederalProcedures, Regional Contract- Irwin, Fort Irwin, CA Land, U.S. Army Corpsing Office, Frankfurt, (12/29/89) of Engineers (1/30/90)Germany (12/22/89)

EU 90-306 Auto Salvage EU 90-308 Range Operations,MW 90-002 Acquisition and Yards, U.S. Army, Europe and Seventh Army TrainingContract Administration, U.S. Seventh Army (1/3/90) Command, Grafenwoehr,Army Engineer Center and Germany (1/30/90)Fort Leonard Wood, Fort EC 90-007 Maintenance FloatLeonard Wood, MO (12/22/89) Requirements for the 7.5-Ton HQ 90-401 Review of the

Light Crane (1/3/90) Army Internal ControlEC 90-200 Quality of Program (FY 89), Director ofMateriel, U.S. Army Tank- EC 90-800 Amusement and Information Systems forAutomotive Command, Vending Machine Operations, Command, Control,Warren, MI (12/22/89) Fort Belvoir, VA (1/4/90) Communications, and

Computers (1/30/90)SO 90-003 Audit of Selected MW 90-201 Audit ofDelivery Orders Under Job Nontactical Vehicles, EU 90-307 InstallationOrder Contracting, XVIII U.S. Army Armor Center Materiel MaintenanceAirborne Corps and Fort and Fort Knox (1/4/90) Activities, V Corps, Frankfurt,Bragg, Fort Bragg, NC Germany (1/31/90)(12/22/89) EC 90-008 Corps-Managed

Recreation Area, U.S. Army EC 90-011 U.S. Army DentalNE 90-202 Reserve Compo. Corps of Engineers, Activity, Fort Eustis, VAnent Pay Systems, 79th U.S. Washington, )C (1/11/90) (2/5/90)Army Reserve Command,Willow Grove, PA (12/22/89) WE 90-004 Controls Over MW 90-005 311 th Military

Ammunition, Fort Iluachuca, Intelligence Battalion, 101stEU 90-800 Planning and AZ (1/12/90) Airborne Division (AirBudgeting for the Morale, Assault) and Fort Campbell,Welfare and Recreation Fund, EC90-201 Qualityof Fort Campbell, KT (2/5/90)Wuerzburg Military Materiel, U.S. Army MaterielCommunity, Wuerzburg, Command, Alexandria, VA SO 90-005 l)wight DavidGermany (12/27/89) (1/16/90) Eisenhower Army Medical

C-4

Center, Fort Gordon, GA EU 90-003 Production and Treaty Implementation(2/6/90) Information Processing Planning, Office of the Deputy

Equipment, Mainz Army Chief of Staff for Operations

SW 90-007 Facilities Depot, Mainz, Germany and Plans, DA (3/1/90)Engineering, U.S. Army South (2/22/90) (CLASSIFIEI))(2/12/90)

NE 90-800 Amusement and SO 90-006 PetroleumWE 90-207 Leased Vending Machine Operations Deliveries, XVIII AirborneCommunications (2/12/90) for the Morale, Welfare and Corps and Fort Bragg, Fort

Recreation Program, U.S. Bragg, NC (3/1/90)MW 90-300 Nebraska Army Army Training Center andNational Guard, Lincoln, NE Fort Dix, Fort l)ix, NJ (2122/90) WE 90-006 Acquisition and(2/12/90) Contract Administration,

WE 90-007 Compensation for Eighth U.S. Army, Seoul,EC 90-012 Property Federal 'rax Liability, U.S. Korea (3/2/90)Accountability, U.S. Army, Army Western Command, FortFort Belvoir, VA (2/13/90) Shafter, 111 (2/26/90) EU 90-309 Facility

Management, U.S. Army,MW 90-004 Acquisition and SO 90-801 Amusement and Europe and Seventh Army

Contract Administration, Vending Machine Operations, (3/5/90)General Procurement Branch, U.S. Army Missile Command,C. M. Price Support Center, Redstone Arsenal, AL (2/26/90) EU 90-006 Property Book

Granite City, IL (2/14/90) Accountability, U.S. MilitaryEU 90-004 Airfield Community Activity,

EC 90-206 Prepositioned Operations, Maurice Rose Stuttgart, Germany (3/8/90)Medical War Reserves Army Airfield, Frankfurt,Program, Walter Reed Army West Germany (2/26/90) NE 90-005 ArmywideMedical Center, Washington, Minicomputer Contract, Fort)C (2/14/90) WE 90-005 Information Monmouth, NJ

Management, lleadquarters, (3/12/90)NE 90-203 Tempest Protection Sixth U.S,. Army and PresidioProgram, Program Executive of San Francisco, San SO 90-009 U.S. Army Corps of

Officer, Communications Francisco, CA (2/26/90) Engineers, Wilmington Dis-Systems, Fort Monmouth, NJ trict, Wilmington, NC(2/16/90) WE 90-209 Toxic Chemical (3/12/90)

Munitions, Tooele Army Depot,

EC 90-202 Family Housing Tooele, UT (2/27/90) SO 90-004 Financial(2/16/90) Management Operations, U.S.

SW 90-009 The Management Army Chemical and Military

SW 90-300 Arkansas Army of Iazardous Material and Police Centers and FortNational Guard, North Little Waste, Red River Army Depot, McClellan, Fort McClellan, AL

Rock, AR (2/20/90) Texarkana, TX (2/27/90) (3/13/90)

NE 90-801 Planning and NE 90-004 Civil Works, U.S. EC 90-010 Cumberland River

Justification for Major Con- Army Engineer District, Basin Hydroelectric Facilities,

struction of Morale, Welfare Pittsburgh, PA (2/28/90) U.S. Army Engineer Division,

and Recreation Facilities, U.S. Ohio River, Cincinnati, OHArmy Mavre ..... Co' ..... n E 90-013 Fu,,nd (3/15/90)

Alexandria, VA (2/20/90) Administration, U.S. ArmyLaboratory Command, SW 90-010 Financial

MW 90-006 Convalescent Adelphi, MD (2/28/90) Operations, Fitzsimons ArmyLeave, Fourth U.S. Army and Medical Center, Aurora, CO,Fort Sheridan, I, (2/21/90) SW 90-008 Panama Canal (3/15/90)

C-S

N E 90-206 Acquisition of Statement of Functional SW 90-204 Use of FundsNondevelopmental Items, U.S. Expenses, For the Year Ended (12/4/89)Army, Natick Research, June 30, 1989 (10/20/89)Deve!opment and Engineering NE 90-501 Review ofCenter, Natick, MA (3/19/90) WE 90-205 Audit of Special Government Cost of

Duty Assignments (10/31/89) Directorate of Engineering andMW 90-009 Duplicate I Iousing Operations, U.S.Emergency Files Program, WE 90-300 Army's Army Training CenterU.S. Army Materiel Command Participation in the Afloat and Fort Dix, Fort Dix, NJ(3/20/90) Prepositioning Force Program, (12/6/89)

Reserve Storage Activty,MW 90-008 Civilian Pay, U.S. Ilythe, United Kingdom HQ 90-752 Internal ControlsArmy Aviation Systems (11/3/89) Over Meat DepartmentCommand, St Louis, MO Operations, U.S. Army Troop(312*190) SO 90-201 Audit of Internal Support Agency, Fort Lee, VA

Review Functions, Phases 1I- (12/11/89)SO 90-700 Foreign IV, U.S. Army Aviation CenterIntelligence Contracting, U.S. and Fort Rucker, Fort Rucker, MW 90-702 Review of BaseArmy Missile Command, AL (11/6/89) Realignment ConstructionRed;tone Arsenal, AL (3/26/90) Requirements, U.S. Army

SW 90-500 Review of Soldier Support Center, FortSW 90-012 Finance and Government Costs of Food Benjomin Harrison, INAccounting Operations, I st Services, U.S. Army Air (12/15/89)Infantry Division (Mechanized) Defense Artillery Center andand Fort Riley, Fort Riley, KS Fort Bliss, Fort Bliss, TX EC 90-203 Audit of Internal(3/27/90) (11/9/89) Review Functions, Phases II-

IV, U.S. Army Logistics CenterSO 90-301 Inactive Duty SO 90-202 Internal Review and Fort Lee (Provisional),Training Assemblies, 81st U.S. Functions, Phases Il-IV, XVIII Fort Lee, VA (12/15/89)Army Reserve Command, East Airborne Corps and FortPoint, GA (3/27/90) Bragg, Fort Bragg, NC EC 90-752 Review of

(11/13/89) Suspected Irregularities inSO 90-007 Followup Audit of Contractor Billings for DrugCommissary Operations, Fort WE 90-003 Survey of the Dependency Testing, ContractBragg, NC (3/30/90) Automation Security Program, Number DADA-15-81)-007

Fort H uachuca, AZ (12/22/89)MEMORANDUM (11/17/89)REPORTS EU 90-005 Observations for

SO 90-204 Audit of Internal Management Consideration,MW 09-700 Review of the Review Functions, Phases 1- Audit of Airfield Operations,Proposed Army Maintenance of IV, Headquarters, Forces Maurice Rose Army Airfield,the Target Acquisition Command, Fort McPherson, Frankfurt, Germany (12/27/89)Designation Sight/Pilot Night GA (11/22/89)Vision Sensor (10/10/89) E U 90-310 Observations for

WE 90-206 Audit oflnternal Management Consideration,WE 90-002 Survey of Central Review Functions, Phases II- Audit of Range Operations,Receiving Operations, Presidio IV, 7th Infantry Division Seventh Army Trainingof San Francisco, CA (10/13/89) (Light) and Fort Ord, Fort Ord, Command, Grafenwoehr,

CA (11/27/89) Germany (12/28/89)EC 90-400 The American RedCross, Combined Statement of EC 90-751 Personnel Strength EC 90-753 Survey of ControlsPublic Support, Revenues and Validation, Ileadquarters, U.S. Over Payments to ContractorsExpenses and Changes in Net Army Materiel Command, for Drug Dependency Testing,Assets and Combined Alexandria, VA (12/1/89) U.S. Total Army Personnel

C-6

Command, Alexandria, VA Materiel Command, SW 90-208 Dining Facility

(1/2/90) Alexandria, VA (1/26/90) Management, Fort Sill, OK(3/14/90)

EU 90-200 Audit of Internal MW 90-704 Review of theReview Functions, VII Corps, Army Internal Control SO 90-012 Reclassification of

Stuttgart, Germany (1/2/90) Program (FY 89), U.S. Army Enlisted Personnel, XVIIITraining and Doctrine Airborne Corps and Fort

EU 90-201 Internal Review Command, Fort Monroe, VA Bragg, Fort Bragg, NC

Functions, 21st Theater Army (1/26/90) (3/28/90)

Area Command, Kaiserslau-tern, Germany (1/2/90) SO 90-502 Review of the ADVISORY REPORTS

Government Costs for

EU90-202 Audit of Internal Operations of the Clothing SW90-AI Planning and

Review Functions, 59th Initial Issue Point, Fort Budgeting for the Installation

Ordnance Brigade, Pirmasens, McClellan, AL (2/5/90) Morale, Welfare, and

Germany (1/2/90) Recreation Fund (12/28/89)SO 90-008 Observations for

EC 90-205 Internal Review Management Consideration,

Functions, Phases Il-IV, Audit of Financial NAVAL AUDITWalter Reed Army Medical Management Operation, U.S. SERVICECenter, Washington, DC Army Chemical and Military(1/4/90) Policy and Fort McClellan, 088-C-89 Funds Administered

Fort McClellan, AL (2/6/90) by the Secretary of the Navy

EU 90-700 Survey of (9/2/89)

Assessment of Equipment EU 90-007 Survey of Project

Maintenance Center, 21st Management, European 086-S-89 Foreign Military

Theater Army Area Command, Telephone System, U.S. Army Training Provided by Navy

Kaiserlautern, Germany Information Systems Training Activities (9/7/89)

(1/4/90) Management Activity(2/8/90) 089-S-89 Reported Costs and

WE 90-750 Summary of Audit Work Progress for the

Assistance to Crime EC 90-208 Audit of School Overhaul of the USS

Prevention Surveys (1/5/90) Payment Procedures for the CINCINNATI (9/11/89)

Junior Reserve Officers'

SO 90-500 Review of the Coin- Training Corps Program, U.S. 075-C-89 Department of the

mercial Activity Study for the Army Reserve Officers' Navy Management Control

Repair Facility at the Tusca- Training Corps Cadet Program and Accounting

loosa Area Office, 'ruscaloosa, Command (2/15/90) Systems Review Process

AL (1/12/90) (9/14/89)EC 90-209 Internal Review

EC 90-207 Internal Review Functions, Phases II-IV, 092-S-89 Operation of the

Functions, Phases II-IV, Fort Ileadquarters, U.S. Army Medical Inventory Control

Monroe, VA (1/19/90) Training and Doctrine System (9/18/89)Command, Fort Monroe, VA

SO 90-501 Review of the Com- (2/16/90) 091-W-89 Followupon

mercial Activity Study for the Selected Aspects of the

Draft and Debris Removal EC 90-600 Audit of Logistics Management Control Program,

Functions at the Tuscaiuoo.a Support Analysis for the A!! Internal Review and Local

Area Office, Tuscaloosa, AL Source Analysis Audits, Procurement, Facility

(1/25/90) System/Enmy Situation Labor Distribution, Property

Correlation Element, Program and Inventories, and

MW 90-703 Review of the Manager, Joint Tactical Fusion Accounting at the Naval

Army Internal Control Program Office, McLean, VA Postgraduate School,

Program (FY 89), U.S. Army (2/16/90) Monterey, CA (9/27/89)

C-7

093-S-89 Information Systems at Marine Corps Logistics Works Center, Pearl Harbor,Management at the Naval Base, Albany, GA (11/16/89) H; (12/19/89)Education and TrainingProgram Management Support 008-S-90 Procurement and 0l-H-90 Review of ReportedActivity (9/29/89) Accountability of Automated Costs for the Overhauls of the

Data Processing Equipment at USS BANCROFT SSBN 643094-S-89 Commercial Activity Marine Corps Logistics Base, and the USS FRANKLINCost Comparison Review of Albany ,GA (11/16/89) SSBN 640 and ForeignBase Supply Operations at Military TrainingNaval Air Station, Oceana, 009-W-90 Selected Aspects of (12/21/89)Virginia Beach, VA (9/29/89) Supply Management,

Submarine Maintenance and 02-H-90 Audit of the090-W-89 Marine Corps Base, Repair, Finance, and Other Department of the Navy's DataCamp Pendleton, California Selected Functions at Trident Processing Installation PhaseRegional Automated Services Refit Facility, Bangor, III Acquisition (12/29/89)Center Operations and Support Bremerton, WA ( 1/24/89)(10/10/89) 019-S-90 Ships' Stores

010-N-90 Effectiveness and Accounting and Management005-C-90 NATO Improvement Efficiency of Contracting (12/29/89)Link Eleven (NILE) Project Officer's Technical(10/17/89) Representatives at Selected 021-W-90 Costs Incurred in

Naval Laboratories (1 1/27/8C) the Competitive Regular001-C-90 Telephone Services Overhaul of the USSat the Naval Air Test 012-N-90 Non-Aviation FLETCHER (1/3/90)Center/Naval Air Station, Repairables ManagementPatuxent River, MD (10/25/89) (11/27/89) 023-C-90 Commercial Activity

Cost Comparison Review of the002-C-90 Selected Aspects of 013-C-90 Selected Aspects of Operation and Maintenance ofComptroller and Supply Accounting, l)isbursing, and Fleet Tugs at the MilitaryFunctions at Headquarters, Payroll Functions at the Naval Sealift Command (1/10/90)Naval District Washington Regional Finance Center,(10/25/89) Washington, DC (11/30/89) 024-C-90 Post Decision

Commercial Activity Review of007-C-90 Project Management 016-C-90 Audit of the United Oceanographic ShipAudit of the Enhanced States/United Kingdom Polaris Operations (i 1/90)Modular Signal Processor Trust Fund (12/6/89)(10/30/89) 025-S-90 I)evelopment of the

011-S-90 Management of Marine Corps Standard Supply006-S-90 Commercial Activity Information Resources Pursu- System at Marine CorpsPost-Decision Review of the ant to Developing the Reserve Logistics Base, Albany, GA -Public Works Department Training Spt System]Tech- Phase If (1/17/90)Maintenance and Utilities nical Enhancement at Com-Function, Naval Air Station, mander, Naval Reserve Force, 020-W-90 Management ofCecil Field, FL (11/1/89) New Orleans, LA (12/8/89) Material and Equipment at

Supply Department, Pacific095-W-89 Payments for Police 014-W-90 Maintenance and Missile'Test Center, Pointand Fire Protection for Family Logistics Support of the F/A-18 Mugu, CA (1/19/90)lousing Jnits ( 1/16/89) Aircraft (12/13/89)

003-H-90 Research of Navy004-S-89 Requirements 015-W-90 Commercial Activ- Publishing and PrintingDetermination for Operating ity Post-Decision Review of Service Billings by theStocks and Spares Acquisition Maintenance of Buildings and Government Printing OfficeValue Enhancement Program Structures at Navy Public (1/26/90)

C-8

027-N-90 Management of 003-S-90 Accountability, 100-0-06 Accounting and

Commercial Repair of Non- Security, and Control Over Finance, Fund Administration

Aviation Material (1/30/90) Reparable Items (2/28/90) and Control (ADSN 5040),Lowry, AFB, CO (11/09/89)

018-W-90 Ship Repair 035-S-90 Consolidation of

Facility/Authorization Supply Functions in the 100-0-07 Management of

Accounting Activity- Geographical Area of Naval Dining Hall Subsistence,

Information System at U.S, Supply Center, Jacksonville, Lowry Technical Training

Naval Ship Repair Facility, FL (3/7/90) Center, Lowry AFB, CO

Subic Bay, Luzon, Republic of (12/21/89)

the Philippines (1/31/90) 053-N-89 Marine CorpsEnlistment and Reenlistment 100-0-08 Accountability of

017-W-90 Management of the Bonus Programs (3/27/90) Chaplain Funds and Property,

Fleet Marine Forces Lowry Technical Training

Maintenance Floats (2/7/90) AIR FORCE AUDIT Center, Lowry AFB, CO

AGENCY (1/10/90)

031-N-90 Contractors'Progress Payments Under INSTALLATION LEVEL 100-0-09 Review of Contractor

Naval Sea Systems Command REPORTS Provided Communications-

Programs (2/8/90) Computer Systems Support,

100-0-01 Controlling the Air Force Accounting and

029-C-90 Contract Award and Movement and Storage of Finance Center, Denver, CO

Administration Functions Personal Property, Lowry (1/11/90)

Performed by Naval Regional AFB, CO (10/12/89)Contracting Center, 100-0-10 Review of Software

Washington, DC (2/14/90) 100-0-02 Management of Air Testing at the Standard Sys-

Force Reserve and Air tems Center, Lowry Technical

030-C-90 Family Housing National Guard Flying Pay, Training Center, Lowry AFB,

Major Repair and Air Force Accounting and CO (Project 9195423) (1/11/90)

Improvement Projects (2/14/90) Finance Center, Denver CO(10/18/89) 100-0-11 Management of

026-N-90 Review and Audit of Foreign Military Sales (FMS)

Morale, Welfare, and 100-0-03 Implementation of Termination Liability

Recreation Activities at the In-House Commercial Activity Reserves, Security Assistance

Naval Air Station, Meridian, Decisions (Grounds Accounting Center (SAAC),

MS (2/13/90) Maintenance Activity), Lowry Denver, CO (1/12/90)Technical Training Center,

028-S-90 Navy Data Lowry AFB, CO (Project 100-0-12 Managing Vehicle

Communications Not Using 9305111) (10/31/89) Operations, Lowry Technical

the Defense Data Network Training Center, Lowry AFB,

(2/16/90) 100-0-04 Development and CO (1/16/90)Reporting of Fiscal Year (FY)

022-S-90 Feedback to Field 1988 Training Course Cost 100-0-13 Evaluation of

Pricing Support Activities from Data, Lowry Technical Controls Over Budget

the Naval Air Systems Training Center (LTTC), Execution of the Operation and

Command I leadquarters Lowry AFB, CO (11/01/89) Maintenance Appropriation,

(2/23/90) Air Force Accounting and

100-0.05 Foreign Military Finance Center. Denver. CO

034-S-90 Commercial Activity Sales (FMS) Packing, Crating, (Project 0255316) (1/16/90)

Cost Comparison Review of and II andling (PC&1l)

Transportation Functions at Charges, Security Assistance 100-0-14 Interest Assessed on

Naval Air Station, Key West, Accounting Center (SAAC), Debts Owed to the Air Force,

FL (2/23/90) Denver, CO (11/02/89) Air Force Accounting and

C-9

Finance Center (AFA PC), 110-0-01 Review of Base Wing, Barksdale AFB, LADenver, CO (1/22/90) Education Services, 3rd Space (1/05/90)

Support Wing, Peterson AFB,100-0-15 Managing Civilian CO (10/18/89) 203-0-03 Followup of ControlsTraining, Lowry Technical Over Civilian Pay, 2dTraining Center, Lowry AFB, 110-0-02 Accounting and Bombardment Wing,CO (1/24/90) Internal Control Procedures of Barksdale AFB, LA

the Air Force Academy (1/29/90)100-0-16 Engine Management, Athletic Association (AFAAA),140th Tactical Fighter Wing, USAF Academy, CO (11/09/89) 203-0-04 Implementation ofBuckley ANGB, CO (1/24/90) the Federal Managers'

110-0-03 Air Force Use of Financial Integrity Act-FY100-0-17 Management of Base Communications Service 1989, 2d Bombardment Wing,Education Services, Lowry Authorizations (CSAs) to Barksdale AFB, LA (ProjectTechnical Training Center, Acquire Tele-Communication 9265320) (2/22/90)Lowry APB, CO (1/29/90) Equipmen and Services,

USAF Academy, CO (Project 208-0-01 F-16 Conversion,100-0-18 Managementof 9066412) (11/14/89) 144th Fighter InterceptorForeign Military Sales (FMS) Wing (Air National Guard),Royalty Fees, Security 110-0-04 Review of Accounting Fresno Air Terminal, Fresno,Assistance and Accounting and Finance Office Military CA (10/02/89)Center (SAAC), Denver, CO Pay and Allowances, 3d Space(2/08/90) Support Wing, Peterson AFB, 208-0-02 Management of

CO (12/28/89) Fxpired Funds, 93rd100-0-19 Evaluation of Bombardment Wing, CastleControls Over Budget 110-0-05 Management of AFB, CA (10/03/89)Execution of the Operation and Vehicle Operations andMaintenance Appropriation, Maintenance, Peterson AB, CO 208-0-03 Management ofAir Reserve Personnel Center, (1/29/90) Unauthorized Equipment OnDenver, CO (Project 0255316) 1land, 93d Bombardment(3/02/90) 110-0-06 Review of Base Wing, Castle AFB, CA

Supply, Equipment (10/25/89)100-0-20 Followup Review of Management Section, U.S. AirGeneral Controls Within the Force Academy, CO (1/30/90) 208-0-04 Review of InitialCommunications and Planning for PersonnelComputer Systems Office, 110-0-07 Review of Concept III Implementation,Lowry Technical Training Communications-Computer 93d Bombardment Wing,Center (LTTC), Lowry AFB, Systems Requirements Castle AFB, CA (ProjectCO (3/08/90) Document (CSRD) Processing 9195422) (10/26/89)

Procedures, HQ Air Force100-0-21 Management of Space Command, Peterson 208-0-05 Management of AirForeign Military Sales (FMS) AFB, CO (3/07/90) Training Command StudentExpenditure Authority and Travel Funds, 93dCMCS/DIFS Transaction 203-0-01 Cost Effectiveness of Bombardment Wing, CastleRejects, Air Force Accounting Satellite Pharmacy A FB, CA (11/15/89)and Finance Center (AF 'FC), Operations, 2nd StrategicDenver, CO (3/15/90) Ilospital, 2nd Bombardment 208-0-06 Management of

Wing, Barksdaie AFB, LA Small Computers, 93d100-0-22 Followup of (Project 9325116) (11 /09/89) Bombardment Wing, CastleForecasting Requirements for APB, CA (11/18/89)Peacetime Conventional 203-0-02 Management of theMunitions, Buckley ANGB, CO Inventory Section, 2d Supply 208-0-07 Deactivation of(3/16/90) Squadron, 2d Bombardment Detachment 1, 318th Fighter

C-10

Interceptor Squadron, Castle 213-0-09 Management of the 218-0-03 Management of

AFB, CA (11/30/89) 1 lydrant/Central Aircraft Civilian Overtime, 90thSupport System (CASS), 96 Strategic Missile Wing, F.E.

208-0-08 Followup of the BMW, Dyess AFB, TX Warren AFB, WY (10/13/89)Management of War Readiness (2/12/90)Spares Kits (FB 4672), 93d 218-0-04 Contractor OperatedBombardment Wing, Castle 213-0-10 Followup of Pest Parts Store (COPARS), 12th

AFB, CA (3/06/90) Control on Construction Air Division, Ellsworth AFB,Projects, 96 BMW, Dyess AFB, SD (11/17/89)

208-0-09 Management of TX (3/14/90)Pharmacy Operations, 93d 218-0-05 General Support

Bombardment Wing, Castle 213-0-11 Interfund Billing Division Stock Fund

AFB, CA (Project 9325116) System-Unmatched or Management, 90th Strategic

(3/08/90) Suspended Bills, 96 BMW, Missile Wing, F.E. WarrenDyess AFB, TX (Project AFB, WY (12/01/89)

213-0-01 Accounting for 0265314) (2/28/90)Materiel Financial Resources, 218-0-06 Management of

96 BMW, Dyess AFB, TX 213-0-12 Management of Repair Cycle Assets, 12th Air

(10/26/89) Powered Aircraft Ground Division, Ellsworth AFB, SDSupport Equipment, 96 13MW, (12/05/89)

213-0-02 Management of Dyess AFB, TX (3/02/90)Vehicle Operations, 7 BMW, 218-0-07 Management ofCarswell AFB, TX (10/23/89) 213-0-13 Management of the Compressed Gases and Gas

General Support Division of Cylinders, 90th Strategic213-0-03 Followup of the Air Force Stock Fund, 96 Missile Wing, F.E. Warren

Management of Support BMW, Dyess AFB, TX AF13, WY (12/05/89)Agreements, 96 BMW, I)yess (3/09/90)AFB,'1'X (12/14/89) 218-0-08 Management of the

213-0-14 Civilian Personnel Personnel Reliability Program,

213-0-04 Followup of Base Staffing Management, 96 90th Strategic Missile Wing,Mobility Plan, 96 BMW, Dyess BMW, l)yess AFB, TX F.E. Warren APB, WY

A FB, TX (12/14/89) (3/14/90) (12/05/89)

213-0-05 ManagementofB-IB 213-0-15 Followup, Manage- 218-0-09 Management ofTransition Program, 96th ment of Aviation Fuel Peace- Recoverable and WasteBombardment Wing, Dyess time Requirements and Inven- Petroleum Products, EllsworthAFB, TX (12/18/89) tories, 96 BMW, Dyess AFB, AFB, SD (12/05/89)

TlX (ProjectO012612O) (3/19/90)

213-0-06 Management of 218-0-10 Followup of the

Organizational Equipment, 7 213-0-16 Management of Food Management of the Minute-

BMW, Carswell AFB, TX Service Operations, 96 BMW, man Education Program

(1/24/90) I)ye.s AFB, Tx (3/19/90) Contract, 12th Air Division,Ellsworth AF3, SD (12/28/89)

213-0-07 Management of 218-0-01 Management ofRepair Cycle Assets, 96 BMW, Fuels, 185th Tactical Fighter 218-0-11 Followupon

Dyess AFB, TX (1/29/90) Group, Iowa Air National Management of Ground Fuels,Guard, Sergent Bluff, IA 12th Air Division, Ellsworth

213-0-08 Review of Moraie, (I0/02/89) AF1, SI) (109/190)Welfare, and Recreation(MWR) Operations, 7th 218-0-02 ManagementofWar 218-0-12 Management ofBombardment Wing, Carswell Readiness Spares Kit, 114th Contract Modifications, 90th

AFB, TX (Project 9285112) Tactical Fighter Group (ANG), Strategic Missile Wing, F.E.

(2/05/90) Sioux Falls, S1) (10/02/89) Warren APB, WY (1/11/90)

C-lI

218-0-13 Followup on Depot Division, Malmstrom AFB, MT 223-0-15 Family HousingReparable Item Processing, (12/06/89) Maintenance Contract, 84012th Air Division, Ellsworth Mission Support Squadron,AFB, SD (1/11/90) 223-0-06 Management of Malmstrom AFB, MT

Commercial Services, 92nd (3/16/90)218-0-14 Review of Appliance Bombardment Wing, FairchildManagement, 90th Strategic APB, WA (12/11/89) 228-0-01 Management ofMissile Wing, F.E. Warren Civilian Overtime, Rivet MileAFB, WY (1/12/90) 223-0-07 Dormitory Location, Grand Forks, ND

Management, 92d (10/01/89)218-0-15 Management of Bombardment Wing, FairchildWRM Pallets and Nets, 12th AFB, WA (12/11/89) 228-0-02 Management of theAir Division, Ellsworth APR, Spectrometer Oil AnalysisSI) (1/12/90) 223-0-08 Ground Fuels Program, 42d Air Division,

Management, 92d Grand Forks AFB, ND218-0-16 TMO--Preight Bombardment Wing, Fairchild (11/06/89)Operations, 12th Air Division, AFB, WA (12/11/89)Ellsworth AFB, S1) (1/24/90) 228-0-03 Management of the

223-0-09 Management of Spectrometer Oil Analysis218-0-17 Management ofthe Ground Fuel Servoplates, 40th Program, Det 3, 37th AirReusable Container Program, Air Division, Malmstrom AFB, Rescue Squadron, Grand Forks12th Air Division, Ellsworth MT (12/26/89) AFB, ND (11/06/89)AF, SD (1/29/90)

223-0-10 Management of Civil 228.0.04 Management of Base218-0-18 Management of Engineering Emergency Visual Information Services,Adjusted Stock Level Program, Generators, 92nd 42nd Air Division, Grand12th Air Division, Ellsworth Bombardment Wing, Fairchild Forks AFB, ND (11/06/89)APB, S1) (3/19/90) AFB, WA (Project 9205215)

(12/26/89) 228-0-05 Managementof223-0-01 Relocation Income Civilian Overtime, 42nd AirTax Allowance, 92nd 223-0-11 Management of the Division, Grand Forks AFB,Bombardment Wing, Fairchild Base UNISYS 2200 Computer ND ( 1/13/89)APB, WA (10/02/89) System, 40th Air Division,

Malmstrom AFB, MT 228-0-06 Small Computer223-0-02 Followup of Vehicle (1/05/90) Accountability, 42nd AirMaintenance Management, Division, Grand Forks AFB,92d Bombardment Wing, 223-0-12 Resource N 1)(01/16/89)Fairchild AF, WA Augmentation Duty (REA)Y)(11/02/89) Program Management, 92nd 228-0-07 Followup of

Mission Support Squadron, Management of Life Support223-0-03 Management of Food Fairchild APB, WA (1/19/90) Equipment, 42nd Air Division,Service Operations, 92d Grand Forks AF, N I)Bombardment Wing, Fairchild 223-0-13 Management of Food (11/30/89)AFB, WA ( 1/14/89) Service Operations, 40th Air

Division, M-'mstrom AFB, MT 228-0-08 Management of Basic223-0-04 Management of (3/09/90) Allowance for Subsistence, 42dEmergency Generators, 5th Air Division, Grand ForksSatellite Control Squadron, 223-0-14 Followup of AF3, N D (12/18/89)Fairchild AFB, WA (Project Management of Material9205215) (11/14/89) Control, Base Civil 228-0-09 Base Accountability

Engineering (BCE) Squadron, of Audiovisual Equipment, 42d223-0-05 Relocation Income 92d Bombardment Wing, Air Division, Grand ForksTax Allowance, 40th Air Fairchild APB, WA (3/09/90) AFB, NI) (12/18/89)

C-12

228-0-10 Warranty Wing, Griffiss AFB, NY (Project 9165117) (1/18/90)

Management, 42nd Air (10/04/89)Division, Grand Forks AFB, 233-0-11 Management of the

ND (1/11/90) 233-0-03 Review of Direct Dependent CareProcurement Procedures, Responsibilities Program, 23r6

228-0-11 Precious Metals Rome Air Development Center, Medical Services Squadron

Recovery Program, 42nd Air Griffiss AFB, NY (10/10/89) (AFRES), Griffiss APB, NY

Division, Grand Forks AFB, (Project 9165117) (1/18/90)ND (1/11/90) 233-0-04 Warehousing of

Local Purchse Items, Base 233-0-12 Mc nagement of the

228-0-12 Management of Supply (FB 4616), 416th Dependent CareCompressed Gas Cylinders, Bombardment Wing, Griffiss Responsibilities Program,

42d Air Division, Grand Forks AFB, NY (10/26/89) 416th Bombardment Wing,

AFB, ND (2/14/90) Griffiss AFB, NY (Project233-0-05 Managementof 9165117) (1/18/90)

228-0-13 Flying Hour Program Flight Kitchen Operations,Management, 148th Fighter 416th Bombardment Wing, 233-0-13 Management of Tail

Interceptor Group (FIG), Griffiss AFB, NY (11/06/89) Number Bins, 416thMinnesota Air National Bombardment Wing, Griffiss

Guard, Duluth lAP, MN 233-0-06 Management of AFB, NY(1/24/90)

(3/01/90) Special Purpose RecoverablesAuthorized Maintenance, Base 233-0-14 Followup of

228-0-14 Management of Supply (FE 6321), 107th Acquisition and Management

Medical War Reserve Material Fighter Interceptor Group of DoD Loeboratory Equipment,

(WRM), 42nd Air Division, (ANG), Niagara Falls lAP, NY Rome Air Development Center,

Grand Forks AFB, ND (1/10/90) Griffiss AFB, NY (Project

(3/03/90) 9016310) (1/30/90)233-0-07 Management of

228-0-15 Management of Outdoor Recreation 233-0-15 Management of

Linen Exchange Activity, 42nd Operations, 416th Mission Support Equipment,

Air Division, Grand Forks Bombardment Wing, Griffiss Base Supply (FE 6324), 174th

AFB, ND (3/06/90) AFB, NY (1/10/90) Tactical Fighter Wing (ANG),lancock Field, NY (2/09/90)

228-0-16 Authorizing and 233-0-08 Implementation ofAccounting for Data Transfer the Federal Managers' 233-0-16 Management of

Unit Cartridges, 42nd Air Financial Integrity Act-FY Commercial Services, 416th

Division, Grand Forks AFB, 1989,416th Bombardment Bombardment Wing, Griffiss

N I) (3/06/90) Wing, Griffiss AFB, NY A FB, NY (2/28/90)(ProjecL 9265320) (1/17/90)

228-0-17 Management of 233-0-17 Followup of

Subsistence In Kind (SIK), 233-0-09 Management of the Disposition of High Power

42nd Air Division, Grand Dependent Care Laboratory Assets, Rome Air

Forks AFB, ND (3/15/90) Responsibilities Program, Development Center, Griffiss933rd Civil Engineering AFB, NY (2/28/90)

233-0-01 Management of Squadron (AFRES), GriffissSelected Base Service AFB, NY (Project 9165117) 233-0-18 Management of

Contracts, Rome Air (1/17/90) Repair Cycle Assets, 416th

Development Center, Grifi ss Bombardment. Wing, Griffiss

APB, NY (10/02/89) 233-0-10 Managementof the AFB, NY(3/05/90)Dependent Care

233-0-02 Followup of Responsib:,ities Program, 233-0-19 Review of Quality

Management of the Self-Help 174th Tactical Fighter Wing Assurance Evaluation for

Program, 416th Bombardment (ANG), lanccck Field, NY Military Family I lousing at

C-'?

Hancock Field NY, 416th 238-0-09 Followup of Bombardment Wing,Bombardment Wing, Griffiss Contingency Opera- McConnell AFB, KS (12/28/89)AFB, NY (3/06/90) tion/Mobility Planning and

Execution System, BMW, K 1 246-0-07 Management of B-1B233-0-20 Managementof Sawyer AFB, M 1 (3/19/90) Aircraft Engines, 384thIlazardous Material, Rome Air Bombardment Wing,Development Center, Griffiss 238-0-10 Land Mobile Radio McConnell AFB, KS (1/12/90)AFB, NY (3/20/90) Management (FE 6491), 128th

Air Refueling Group (ANG), 2,46-0-08 Followup of Review238-0-01 Accounting and General Billy Mitchell Field, of Air National Guard Acqui-Finance (ADSN 5969), Paying WI (3/19/90) sition Procedures and Prac -and Collecting, Verification of tices, 190th Air RefuelingCash, 410 BMW, K I Sawyer 238-0-11 Management of Group, Kansas Air NationalAFB, M 1 (10/02/89) Ground Support Chemical Guard, Forbes Field, KS

Warfare Defense Equipment, (2/02/90)238-0-02 Management of 128 AREFG (ANG), GeneralControlled Drugs, 41Oth Billy Mitchell Field, 246-0-09 Followup of ReviewBombardment Wing, K I Milwaukee, WI (3/19/90) of Air National GuardSawyer AFB, MI (10/16/89) Acquisition Procedures and

238-0-12 Managementof Practices, 190th Air Refueling238-0-03 Management of Fuels, 410th Bombardment .roup, Kansas Air NationalCivilian Pay (AI)SN 5969), Wing, K I Sawyer AFB, MI Guard, Forbes Field, KS410th Bombardment Wing, K 1 (3/20/90) (2/02/90)Sawyer AFB, MI (11/09/89)

246-0-01 Management of Land 246-0-10 Management of Fuel238-0-04 Quality Assurance Mobile Radio Equipment, Price Changes (FB 4621),Surveillance Over Contractor- 384th Bombardment Wing, 384th Bombardment Wing,Operated Parts Store McConnell AFB, KS (10/24/89) McConnell AFB, KS (2/16/90)(COPARS) Contract, 410thBombardment Wing, K 1 246-0-02 Management of the 246-0-Il Followup ofSawyer AFB, MI (11/28/89) Linen Exchange Activity, Management of Aviation Fuel

384th Bombardment Wing Peacetime Requirements and238-0-05 Implementation of (BMW), McConnell AFB, KS Inventories (FB 4621), 384thIn-I louse Commercial Activity (11/09/89) Bombardment Wing,Decisions, 410th Bomardment McConnell AFB,KS (ProjectWing, K I Sawyer AFB, MI 246-0-03 Management of 0126120) (2/23/90)(Project 9305111) (12/04/89) Controlled Schedule II Drugs,

384th Bombardment Wing, 246-0-12 Management of238-0-06 Oil Analysis McConnell AFB, KS (12/01/89) Vehicle Operations, 184 TFG,Program, 305th Air Refueling Kansas ANG, McConnell AFB,Wing, Grissom APB, IN 246-0-04 Management ofthe KS (2/28/90)(2/07/90) Individual Equipment Unit

(FB 4621), 384th 246-0-13 Followup of238-0-07 Tank Truck Refueler Bombardment Wing, Management of CivilRequirements and Utilization, McConnell APB, KS (12/06/89) Engineering Materials, 384th128th Air Refueling Group Bombardment Wing,(ANG), General Billy Mitchell 246-0-05 Management of Base McConnell AFB, KS (3/06/90)Field, WI (2/08/90) Support Reimbursements,

384th Bombardment Wing, 251-0-01 Followup Review of238-0-08 Management of McConnell AFB, KS (12/26/89) Logistical Support for the AirMinor Construction Projects, Launched Cruise Missile305th Air Refueling Wing, 246-0-06 Review of Year-End Activation, 57th Air Division,Grissom AFB, IN (3/19/90) Obligations, 384th Minot AFB, ND (10/04/89)

C-14

251-0-02 Management of BAQ 251-0-13 Management of 260-0-05 Air ForceRecertification Program, 57th Aerospace Ground Equipment Implementation of the FederalAir Division, Minot AFB, ND Maintenance, 57th Air Manager's Financial Integrity(10/13/89) Division, Minot A FB, N ) Act -FY 1989, Headquarters

(3/19/90) Strategic Air Command, Offutt251-0-03 Aircraft Engine AFB, NE (Project 9265320)Management, 57th Air 251-0-14 Controls Over (10/10/89)Division, Minot AFB, ND Hospital Equipment, 57th Air(11/03/89) Division, Minot AFB, ND 260-0-06 Management of

(3/19/90) Special Purpose Recoverables251-0-04 Sole Source Authorized MaintenanceNoncompetitive Purchase 251-0-15 Followup, Review of (SPRAM), 513th 'estRequests, 57th Air Division, Environmental Pollution, Squadron, Offutt APB, NEMinot AFB, ND (11/22/89) Prevention, Control, and (10/13/89)

Abatement, 57th Air Division,251-0-05 Management of Minot AFB, N ) (Project 260-0-07 Management of AirVehicle Tires and Batteries, 0175214) (3/19/90) 'Force Owned Appliances, 351st57th Air Division, Minot AFB, Strategic Missile Wing,ND (11/22/89) 251-0-16 Management of the Whiteman AFB, MO (10/20/89)

Grounds Maintenance251-0-06 Management of the Program, 57th Air Division, 260-0-08 Management of theMission Capability (MICAP) Minot AFB, NI) (3/19/90) Do-It-Yourself (DITY) MoveProgram, Minot AFB, ND Program, 55th Strategic(1/22/89) 251-0-17 Management of Reconnaissance Wing, Offutt

Chemical Warfare Defense AFB, NE (10/23/89)251-0-07 Management of Equipment Mobility Bags,Spares Support Lists, 57th Air 2150th Communications 260-0-09 Management of AirDivision, Minot A FB, N ) Squadron, Minot AFB, N I) Force Confidential(12/21/89) (3/19/90) Investigative Contingency

Funds, Air Force Office of251-0-08 Report of Survey 260-0-01 Management of Special Investigations DistrictProgram, 57th Air Division, Ground Fuels, 55th Strategic 13, Offutt AFB, N E (ProjectMinot AFB, ND Reconnaissance Wing, Offutt 205211) (11/01/89)(1/19/90) AFB, NE (10/03/89)

260-0-10 Ehrling Bergquist2EI-0-09 Management of 260-0-02 Review of Selected USAF Regional Ilospital,Flight Pay, 57th Air Division, Aspects of Contractor Operated Management of Medical LocalMinot AFB, ND (1/26/90) Parts Store (COPARS), 55th Purchase Program, 55th

Strategic Reconnaissance Strategic Reconnaissance251-0-10 Managementof Life Wing, Offutt AFB, NE Wing, Offutt AFB, NESupport Equipment, 57th Air (10/04/89) (11/01/89)Division, Minot AFB, ND(2/09/90) 260-0-03 Management of the 260-0-11 Management of

Personnel Reliability Program, Missile Maintenance Training,251-0-11 Controls Over 55th Strategic Reconnaissance 351 Strategic Missile Wing,Military Leave, 57th Air Wing, Offutt AFB, NE Whiteman APB, MO (11/02/89)Division, Minot AFB, ND (10/04/89)(2/16/90) 260-0-12 Management of

260-0-04 Followup of Base Special Purpose Recoverables251-0-12 Maintenance of Supply Inventory Section, 55th Authorized MaintenanceHospital Equipment, 57th Air Strategic Reconnaissance (SPRAM), 55th StrategicDivision, Minot AFB, ND Wing, Offutt AFB, NE Reconnaissance Wing, Offutt(2/16/90) (10/05/89) A FB, N E (11/03/89)

C-15

260-0-13 Management of Time Lincoln, NE (1/03/90) 260.0-31 Review ofCompliance Technical Orders Communications Security(Minuteman), 351st Strategic 260-0-22 Evaluation of Food (COMSEC) EquipmentMissile Wing, Whiteman AFB, Service Funds Control, 55th Accountability, IIQ StrategicMO (11/08/89) Strategic Reconnaissance Air Command, Offutt AFB, NE

Wing, Offutt AFB, NE (2/26/90)260-0-14 Selected Aspects of (1/09/90)the Energy Security Program- 260-0-32 Management of BaseManugement of Emergency 260.0-23 Software Testing at Telephone Services, 55thGenerators, I IQ SAC, Offutt the Standard Systems Center, Strategic ReconnaissanceA FE, NE (Project 9205215) 1st Aerospace Communications Wing, Offutt AFE, NE(11/08/89) Wing, Offutt AFB, NE (2/27/90)

(Project 9195423) (1/29/90)260-0-15 Management of the 260-0-33 Followup of Cash,Suggestion Program, 55th 260-0-24 Management of Sales, and Food ProductionStrategic Reconnaissance Schedule 11 Drugs, Ehrling Controls Within theWing, Offutt AFB, NE Bergquist USAF Regional Noncommissioned Officers(11/14/89) Hospital, 55th Strategic Open Mess, 351 Strategic

Reconnaissance Wing, Offutt Missile Wing, Whiteman AFB,260-0-16 Air Force AFB, NE (1/30/90) MO (3/01/90)Implementation of the FederalManager's Financial Integrity 260-0-25 Management of 260-0-34 Management ofAct - FY 1989, 55th Strategic Troop Issue and Cash Assets - Linen Exchange Program, 55thReconnaissance Wing, OCfutt Commissary Operations, Strategic ReconnaissanceAFB, NE (Project 9265320) Whiteman AFB, MO (2/05/90) Wing, Offutt AFB, NE(11/15/89) (3/01/90)

260-0-26 Management of Time260-0-17 Management of Base ComplianceTechnical Orders, 260-0-35 Review ofSupply Pickup and Delivery, 132d Tactical Fighter Wing, Communications Security55th Strategic Reconnaissance Des Moines ANG, IA (2/09/90) (COMSEC) EquipmentWing, Offutt AFB, NE Accountability, 1st Aerospace(11/20/89) 260-0-27 Management of Communications Wing, Offutt

Imprest Funds, 55th Strategic AFB, NE (3/05/90)260-0-18 Engine Management Reconnaissance Wing, OffuttAccountability and Reporting AF1, NE (2/16/90) 260-0-36 Management ofProcedures, 55th Strategic Communication EquipmentReconnaissance Wing, Offutt 260-0-28 Review of Communi- Maintenance, 1254A F,3, N E (12/18/89) cations Security Equipment Communications Squadron,

Accountability, 55th Strategic Whiteman APE, MO260-0-19 Management of Reconnaissance Wing, Offutt (3/14/90)Without Dependent Rate Basic AFB, NE (2/16/90)Allowance for Quarters, 351st 260-0-37 Management ofStrategic Missile Wing, 260-0-29 Review of Morale, Ground Fuels, 351 st StrategicWhiteman AFB, MO (12/29189) Welfare, and Recreation Missile Wing, Whiteman AFB,

(MWR) Operations, 55th MO (3/19/90)260-0-20 Management of Strategic ReconnaissanceTravel Services, 55th SRW, Wing, Offutt AFB, NE (Project 260-0-38 Management ofOffutt AFB, NE (Project 9285112) (220/90) Hazardous Materials. 55th9076414) (12/29/89) Strategic Reconnais.ance

260-0-30 Management of the Wing, Offutt AF1, NE260-0-21 Management of Tirre Do-lt-Yourself(DITY) Move (319/90)Compliance Technical Orders, Program, 351st Strategic155 TacticA Reconnaissance Missile Wing, Whiteman AFB, 260-0-39 Management of'Group, 2a('i West Adams, MO (2/22/90) System 463L Pallets and Nets,

C-16

6949th Electronic Security 271-0-07 Selected Aspects of 271-0-17 Followup,Squadron, Offutt AFB, NE the Energy Security Program, Management o'Aviation Fuel

(3/19/90) Management of Emergency Peacetime Requirements andGenerators, 379th Inventories, 42nd Born-

264-0-01 Management of Bombardment Wing, bardment Wing, Loring APB,

Ground Fuels, 509th Wurtsmith AFB, MI (Project ME (Project 0126120) (2/23/90)Bombardment Wing, Pease 0205215) (12/15/89)AFB, NHi (10/26/89) 271-0-18 Management of Civil

271-0-08 Management of the Engineering Bulk Purchase

264-0-02 Management of the Resource Augmentation Duty Deliveries, 127th Tactical

Medical Logistics Buyer (READY) Program, 379th Fighter Wing, SelfridgeProgram, 509th Strategic Bombardment Wing, .A NGB, M1 (2/27/90)Hospital, Pease AFB, NIl Wurtsmith AFB, MI (12/21/89)(12/18/89) 271-0-19 Accountability for

271-0-09 Management of U- Small Computers, 379th264-0-03 Evaluation of Supply Fix-It Store, 379th Bombardment Wing,and Equipment Due-Outs, Bombardment Wing, Wurtsmith AFB, MI (2/28/90)509th Bombardment Wing, Wurtsmith APB, MI (12/21/89)Pease AFB, NH (12/18/89) 271-0-20 Management of

271-0-10 Management of Supply Receiving Section,

271-0-01 Management of Supply Receiving Section, 127th Tactical Fighter Wing,Aircrew Life Support 379th Bombardment Wing, Selfridge ANGB, MI (2/28/90)

Equipment, 160th Life Wurtsmith APB, Ml (1/22/90)Support, Rickenbacker ANGB, 271-0-21 Vehicle MaintenanceO11 (10/11/89) 271-0-11 Management of and Operations, 379th Born-

Billeting Operations, 379th bardment Wing, Wurtsmith

271-0-02 Management of the Bombardment Wing, APB, MI (3/12/90)Precision Measurement Wurtsmith AFB, MI (1/29!90)Equipment Laboratory, 379th 271-0-22 Legal Claims inBombardment Wing, 271-0-12 Management of Base Association of PermamentWurtsmitb APB, MI (11/07/89) Fuels, 379th Bombardment Change oStation (PCS)

Wing, Wurtsmith AFB, MI Moves, 379th Bombardment271-0-03 Management of the (1/29/90) Wing, Wurtsmith APB, MlResource Recovery and (3/16/90)Recycling Program, 379th 271-0-13 Management ofBombardment Wing, Flightline Support Equipment 301-0-01 Management of theWurtsmith AFB, MI (11/07/89) (FLSE), Selfridge ANGB, MI Munitions Supply Account (FBl

(1/31/90) 6191), 175th 'actical Fighter

271-0-04 Financial Group (TFG), Air NationalManagement of the Child 271-0-14 Accounting and Guard, Middle River, MDDevelopment Center, 379th Finance Activities (ADSN (10/06/89)Bombardment Wing, 6791), Cash Verification, 379thWurtsmith AFB, MI (11/07/89) Bombardment Wing, 301-0-02 Management of

WurtsmithAFB, Ml (1/31/90) Bench Stock Support, 1776th271-0-05 Followup of Civil Air Base Wing SupplyEngineering Material Control, 271-0-15 Management of Squadron, (FB 4425), AndrewsWurtsmith AFB, Ml (11/07/89) Travel, 379th Bombardment APB, DC (10/10/8)

Wing, Wurtsmith AFB, MI271-0-06 Management of Base (2102/90) 30 1-0-03 iFoiiowup of SeiecLedFuels, 121stTFW COS-Fuels Air National Guard (ANG)

Management Branch, 271-0-16 Management of'rime Acquisition Procedures andRickenbacker ANGB, Oil Compliance Technical Orders, Practices, 135 Tactical Airlift

(12/01/89) Wurtsmith AFB, MI (2/14/90) Group (TAG), Air National

C-17

Guard, Middle River, M) 301-0-11 Managenientof nautical Systems Division,(10/20/89) Intelligence Contingency WPA FB, OfI (10/31/89)

Funds--Fiscal Year 1989, Air301-0-04 Processing Force Intelligence Policy, 305-0-03 Review of the 4950thReimbursements and Refunds Plans and Programs, Test Wing Information System,for Vehicle Maintenance and Pentagon, Washington, DC Aeronautical SystemsRepairs, Accounting and (Project 0205210) (1/26/90) Division, WPAFB, O11Finance Office (ASI)N 5037), (11/08/89)1100 Resource Management 301-0-12 ManagementofGroup (RMG), Air Force Medical Equipment Repair 305-0-04 Selected Review ofDistrict of Washington, Boiling Center, Malcolm Grow Medical Post Production Issues, Aero-AFB, DC (10/23/89) Center (MGMC), Andrews nautical Systems Division,

AFB, DC (2/29/90) WPAFB, Ol (11/13/89)301-0-05 Management ofVehicle Maintenance and 301-0-13 Managementof the 305-0-05 Air ForceRepair, 1776th Air Base Wing Engine Cannibalization Managementof UndefinitizedTransportation Squadron, Program, 459th Military Contractual Actions, Aero -Andrews AFB, )C (10/23/89) Airlift Wing (MAW), Air Force nautical Systems Division,

Reserve (AFRES), Andrews WPAFB, OIl I(Project9046410)301-0-06 Management of AF, DC (2/02/90) (12/08/89)Decentralized BlanketPurchase Agreements, 301-0-14 tIQ USAIF Special 305-0-06 Management of theMalcolm Grow Medical Center Fund, I100th National Capital Aeronautical Systems Division(MGMC), Andrews AFB, DC Region Support Group Safety Program, Aeronautical(10/26/89) (NCRSPTG), Air Force District Systems Division, WPAFB, OH

of Washington, Pentagon, DC (1/08/90)301-0-07 Management of (2/07/90)Operational Support Aircraft, 305-0-07 Review of SRAM IIDistrict of Columbia Air 301-0-15 Management of Program, Ae:onauticalNational Guard I)etachment Confidential Investigative Systems Division, WPAF3, Oil(Det) I, Andrews APB, DC Contingency Funds - Fiscal (1/12/90)(10/27/89) Year 1989, 1 IQ Air Force Office

of Special Investigations, 305-0-08 Logistics Materiel301-0-08 Management of BoIling AFB, DC (Project Control Activity CustomerLogistic Support for 0205211) (3/13/90) Support Procedures, WrightConversion From ''-39 to C-21 Research and l)evelopmentAircraft, Detachment 1, IIQ 301-0-16 Managementof Air Center (WRDC), AeronauticalDistrict of Columbia Air Force Official Representation Systems )ivision, WPAFB, OilNational Guard, Andrews Contingency Funds - FY 1989, (1/25/90)APB, I)C (12/21/89) Air Force bystems Command

(AFSC), Andrews AFB, DC 305-0-09 Management of301-0-09 Validation Criteria (Projrect 0205212) (3/14/90) Intelligence Contingencyfor Scheduling Operational Funds--Fiscal Year 1989, IIQSupport Airlift, Air National 305-0-01 Managementof Foreign Technology Division,Guard Support Center, Warranties and Options on the WPAFB, Oil (Project 0205210)Andrews AFB, DC (12/22/89) Standardzed Central Air Data (2/09/90)

Computer Program, Aero-301-0-10 'anagemenLof nautical Systems Division, 305-0-i0 Foiiowupon theBench Stock Support, 113 WPAFB, Oi (10/19/89) Acquisition and ManagementTactical Fighter Wing (TFW), of DoD Laboratory Equipment,District of Columbia Air 305-0-02 Managementof WRDC, Avionics Laboratory,National Guard, Andrews Precious Metals in the WPAFB, 01 (Project 9016310)A P13, )C (12/22/89) Acquisition Process, Aero- (2/15/90)

C-18

305-0-11 Vollowupon the Division, Norton APF, CA 315-0-04 Review of ResearchAcquisition and Management (12/06/89) and Development Cost Plusof Do) Laboratory Equipment, Award Fee Contracts (CPAF),AAMRL,WPAFB, Oil (Project 311-0-03 Followup of Titan IV AFFTC, Edwards AF, CA9016310) (2/22/90) Component Breakout (2/07/90)

Procedures, Space Systems

305-0-12 Followup on the Division, Los Angeles AF, CA 320-0-01 Management of the

Management and Use of (12/07/89) Joint Oil Analysis Program,Telephone Credit Cards, 33rd T'actical Fighter Wing,Aeronautical Systems Divi- 311-0-04 Followupof Eglin AFB, FL (10/02/89)sion, WPAFB, Ol (2/28/90) Warranty Management of

Peacekeeper Non-Propulsion 320-0-02 Management of the

305-0-13 Management of Systems, Ballistic Systems Joint Oil Analysis Program,Award Fee Contracts Within Division, Norton AFB, CA Munitions Systems Division,the Wright Research and (Project 9036325) (1/24/90) Eglin A FB, FL ( 0/06/89)Development Center, Aero-nautical Systems Division, 311-0-05 Review of 320-0-03 Meal CardWPAFB, 011 (2/28/90) Administration of the Management, 1st Special

Aerospace Technical Support Operations Wing, 1H urlburt305-0-14 Contracting for Contract, Space Systems Field, FL (10/27/89)Computer Training, Division, Los Angeles APB, CAAeronautical Systems (2/06/90) 320-0-04 Review of UtilityDivision, WPAFB, Oil Services and Reimbursements,(REVISE)) (3/09/90) 311-0-06 Management ofthe 1st Special Operations Wing,

Air Force Drug Testing I lurlburt Field, FL (11/15/89)

305-0-15 Quality Assurance in Program, Space Systemsthe F110-GE-100/-129 Engine Division, Los Angeles AF, CA 320-0-05 Management of thePrograms, Aeronautical (2/15/90) Depot Maintenance QualitySystems Division, WPAFB, OH Assurance Program, Munitions

(3/14/90) 311-0-07 Management of Systems Division, Eglin AFB,Contract Depot Missile FL (Project 9106216)

305-0-16 Review of Spare Maintenance Activities, (11/27/89)Fl 17 Engine Requirements for AFPRO Aerojet-GeneralC-17 Aircraft, Aeronautical Corporation, Sacramento, CA 320-0-06 Review of Air ForceSystems Division, WPAFB, O1I (Project 0106218) (3/16/90) Educational Services Program,(Project 0126121) (3/i9/90) Munitions Systems Division,

315-0-01 Review of MC-13011 Eglin AFB, FL (12/04/89)

305-0-17 Requirements for Combat Talon II SupportFI00-PW and F 110-GE Spare Equipment Requirements, 320-0-07 Management oftheEngines and Modules, 6510 Test Wing, Edwards AFB, Depot Maintenance QualityAeronautical Systems CA (Project 9036311) Assurance Program, 33dDivision, WPAFB, OH (Project (10/13/89) Tactical Fighter Wing, Eglin

9126118) (3/19/90) AFB, FL (Project 9106216)315-0-02 Conservation and (12/18/89)

311-0-01 Management of the Use of Water Resources, 6500Industrial Modernization Civil Engineering Squadron, 320-0-08 Review of the

Incentive Program at Ballistic Edwards AFB, CA (Project Software Testing and Release

Systems Division, Norton AFi3, 9180001) (10/25/89) 'Prucess at the StandardCA (11/15/89) Systems Center, Munitions

315-0-03 Review of Base Systems Division, Eglin AFB,

311-0-02 Followup of Close Landscape Planning, Project FI, (Project 9195423) (12/19/89)

Out of Physically Completed inage, 6500 Civil EngineeringContracts With Unliquidated Squadron, Edwards AF, CA 320-0-09 Management ofObligations, Ballistic Systems (Project 9180001) (11/01/89) Repair Cycle Assets, I st

C-19

Special Operations Wing, Systems Division, Eglin AFB, 325-0-09 Management ofIHuriburt Field, Fl, (12/20/89) Fl. (3/16/90) Small Computer Systems, 143

Tactical Airlift Group, Quonset320-0-10 Managementof 320-0-19 Managementof State Air',-t, RI (1/11/90)Equipment for Support of Precious Metals in SystemsResearch, Development, Test Acquisition, Munitions 325-0-10 Management ofand Evaluation, Munitions Systems Division, Eglin AFB, Government-Owned Appli-Systems Division, Eglin AFB, FL (3/20/90) ances, 3245 Air Base Group,FL (1/12/90) 1lanscom AFIB, MA

325-0-01 Review of Base-Level (1/23190)320-0-11 Management of Preparation for 2nd-YearVariable Housing Allowance Personnel Concept Ill 325-0-11 EquipmentEntitlements, Munitions Implementation Sites, 3245 Accountability and Control,Systems Division, Eglin AFB, Air Base Group, I lanscom WIS Systems Program Office,FL (1/19/90) AFB, MA (Project 9195422) Electronic Systems Division,

(10/05/89) Hanscom AFB, MA (1/29/90)320-0-12 Management of AFOfficial Representation 325-0-02 Managementofthe 325-0-12 Surveillance of theContingency Funds - FY 89, I)o-lt-Yourself Move Program, Custodial and RefuseAir Force Engineering and Ser- 3245 Air Base Group, Hanscom Collection Service Contracts,vices Center, Tyndall AFB, FL AFB, MA (10/05/89) 3245 Air Base Group, Hanscom(Project 0205212) (1/25/90) AFB, MA (2/26/90)

325-0-03 Logistic Support--320-0-13 Review of Civilian Allowance, Authorization, and 325-0-13 Administration of theEducational Services Program, Requisition of Equipment, Base Suggestion Program,Munitions Systems Division, 3245 Air Base Group, llanscom 3245 Air Base Group, lanscomEglin AFB, FL (1/30/90) AFB, MA (11/03/89) AFB, MA(3/14/90)

320-0-14 Management of 325-0-04 Management of Food 325-0-14 1ollowup of ReviewDependent Care Services, 3245 Air Base Group, of Environmental PollutionResponsibilities Program, lanscom AFB, MA (11/22/89) Prevention, Control, andMunitions Systems Division, Abatement, ElectronicEglin AFB, FL (Project 325-0-05 Alternative Care Systems Division, I lanscom9165117) (2/02/90) Payments Program, AFSC AFB, MA (Project 0175214)

Ciinic, Hanscom AFB, MA (3/20/90)320-0-15 Management of (12/07/89)Dependent Care 330-0-01 SubtaskResponsibilities Program, 1st 325-0-06 Logistic Support-- Management of the SecuredSpecial Operations Wing, Allowance, Authorization and Optics Laboratory Project,H1urlburt Field, Fl, (Project Requisition of Equipment, Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland9165117) (2/09/90) Tactical Airlift Group, Quonset AFB, NM (10/19/89)

State Airport, RI (12/18/89)320-0-16 Management of 330-0-02 Management ofRefueling Vehicles, Munitions 325-0-07 Management of Mobility Bags, 150 TacticalSystems Division, Eglin AFB, Civilian Pay, 143 Tactical Fighter Group, New MexicoFL (3/09/90) Airlift Group, Quonset State Air National Guard, Kirtland

Airport, RI (12/18/89) AFB, NM (1 2/15/89)320-0-17 Billeting Operations,1st Special Operations Wing, 325-0-08 Contracting for 330-0-03 Rev;ew of SelectedHurlburt Field, FL (3/16/90) Travel Services, Electronic Aspects of the Energy Security

Systems l)ivision, Ianscom Program, Management of320-0-18 Review of Name AFB, MA (Project 9076414) Emergency Generators, 1606Brand Purchases, Munitions (1/05/90) Air Base Wing, Kirtland APB

C-20

NM (Project 9205215) 330-0-11 Effectiveness of Center (ESMC), Patrick AFB,

(12/15/89) Automated Contract Payment FL (12/01/89)Procedures, Contract

330-0-04 Review of Funding Management Division, 335-0-07 Management of

Actions for the Military Family Kirtland AFB, NM (3/15/90) Intelligence Contingency

Housing Maintenance Funds - Fiscal Year 1989 (U),

Contract, Directorate of 330-0-12 Evaluation of Patrick AFB, Fl, (Project

Contracting, Air Force Space Controls Over Budget Execu- 0205210) (12/15/89)Technology Center, Kirtland tion of the Operations and (CLASSIFIEI))AFB, NM (12/20/89) Maintenance (O&M) Appro-

priation (5793400), 1606 ABW, 335-0-08 Followup- USAF

330-0-05 Management of Test, Kirtland AFB, NM (Project Ilospital, Access to Ilealth

Measurement, and Diagnostic 0255316) (3/19/90) Care, Eastern Space and

Equipment Branch, 1550 Missile Center (ESMC),

Combat Crew Training Wing, 330-0-13 Management of Patrick AFB, FL (12/15/89)

Kirtland AFB, NM (12/22/89) Injury Compensation Claims,1606 ABW, Kirtland AFB, NM 335-0-09 Management of Unit

330-0-06 Contract (Project 0155110) (3/19/90) Training Assemblies (UTAs)

Administration of the Military and Annual Training, 202

Family Ilousing Maintenance 335-0-01 Management of the Red I lorse (RI 1) Civil

Con!ract, Directorate of Commercial Expendable Engineering Squadron (CES),

Con tracting, Air Force Space Launch Vehicle (ElV) Camp Blanding, FL (12/15/89)

Technology Center, Kirtland Program (Revised), EasternAFB, NM (1/18/90) Space and Missile Center, 335-0-10 Managementof

Patrick AFB, Fl, (Project Aircraft Maintenance

330-0-07 Contract 9036315) (10/10/89) Cannibalizations and Deferred

Surveillance of the Military Discrepancies, 125th Fighter

Family Housing Maintenance 335-0-02 Management of the Interceptor Group (FIG),Contract, 1606 Civil DrugTesting Program, AFOSI Jacksonville, FL (12/15/89)

Engineering Squadron, District 7, Patrick AFB, FLKirtland AFB, NM (1/19/90) (10/20/89) 335-0-11 Management of the

Report of Survey Program,

330-0-08 Base Supply (FE/FB 335-0-03 Controls Over Small Eastern Space and Missile

4469), Management of Computers, Eastern Space and Center (ESMC), Patrick AFB,

Compressed Gases and Gas Missile Center (ESMC), FL (12/20/89)Cylinders, 1606 Air Base Patrick AFB, Fl, (10/27/89)Wing, Kirtland AFB, NM 335-0-12 Administration of the

(1/22/90) 335-0-04 Management of Cape Canaveral APSResearch, Development, Test Construction/Architecture and

330-0-09 Management of and Evaluation (RI)T&E) Engineering (A&E) Contract,

Precision Measurement Equipment, Eastern Space and Eastern Space and Missile

Equipment, Weapons Missile Center (ESMC), Center, Patrick AFB, FL

Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, NM Patrick AFB, FL (11/17/89) (1/08/90)(1/26/90)

335-0-05 Management of the 335-0-13 Management of Unit

330-0-10 Management of Air Drug Testing Program, 3533 Training Assemblies (UTAs)

Force Official Representation USAF Recruiting Squadron and Annual Training, 125

Contingency Funis, Fiscal (USAFRS), Patrick AFL, FL Fighter Interceptor Group

Year 1989, Air Force (11/24/89) (FIG), Jacksonville, FL

Operational Test and (1/08/90)Evaluation Center, Kirtland 335-0-06 Management of theAFB, NM (Project 0205212) DrugTesting Program, 335-0-14 Control Over Off-

(3/01/90) Eastern Space and Missile Duty Employment, Eastern

C-21

Space and Missile Center, Environmental Pollution 405-0-08 Accuracy of SelectedPatrick AFB, Fl, (2/22/90) Prevention, Control, and Aircraft Wartime Spares

Abatement Program, I st Requirements, Ogden Air335-0-15 Management of Strategic Aerospace Division, Logistics Center, Ifill APB, UTDependent Care Responsi- Vandenberg AFB, CA (Project (Project 9126116)bilities Program, Eastern 0175214) (2/15/90) (11/15/89)Space and Missile Center(ESMC), Patrick AFB, FL 405-0-01 Managementof 405-0-09 Review of Controls(Project 9165117) (2/27/90) Maintenance Inventory Over Material and Equipment

Centers Special Levels, Ogden Within the Logistics Material335-0-16 Controls Over Small Air Logistics Center, I fill AF, Control Activity, 6545th TestComputers, Air Force UT (10/03/89) Group, I Iill AFB, UT (1 1/16/89)Technical Applications Center(AFTAC), Patrick AFB, FL 405-0-02 Followup of 405-0-10 C-5 Aircraft Brakes(3/05/90) Management of Time and Landing Gear

Compliance Technical Order Requirement Computations,340-0-01 Management of Basic Kits, Ogden Air Logistics Ogden Air Logistics Center,Allowance for Quarters, Center, Hill APB, UT Hill AFB, UT (11/17/89)4392nd Aerospace Support (10/12/89)Wing, Vandenberg AFB, CA 405-0-11 Followup-(10/16/89) 405-0-03 Management of Management of Floating Stock,

Items Identified for Disposal in Ogden Air Logistics Center,340-0-02 Managementof Air Time Change Technical lill APB, UT (12/12/89)Force Suggestion Program, Orders, Ogden Air Logistics4392d Aerospace Support Center, Hill AFB, UT 405-0-12 Management ofWing, Vandenberg APB, CA (10/18/89) Subsistence-in-Kind, 1881st(11/24/89) Communications Squadron,

405-0-04 Replenishment Ilill AFB, UT (12/15/89)340-0-03 Management of Base Spares Lead Times andTelephone Facilities, 1st Stra- Delivery Schedules, Ogden Air 405-0-13 Management of thetegic Aerospace Division, Van- Logistics Center, Iiill APB, UT Depot Maintenance Qualitydenberg AFB, CA (12/26/89) (Project 9126115) (10/25/89) Assurance Program, Ogden Air

Logistics Center, lill AFB, UT340-0-04 Followup, Review of 405-0-05 Controlling (Project 9106216) (12/21/89)Environmental Pollution Delinquent Deliveries for AirPrevention, Control, and Force Logistics Command 405-0-14 Management of BaseAbatement Program, Western Spare Parts Contracts, Ogden Fuels Quality Control, OgdenSpace and Missile Center, Air Logistics Center, Hill AFB, Air Logistics Center, Il ill AFB,Vandenberg AF, CA (Project UT (Project 9076413) UT (12/22/89)0175214) (1/17/90) (10/27/89)

405-0-15 Status of Resources340-0-05 Review of Chaplain 405-0-06 Management of and Training SystemFund, 4392d Aerospace Selected Mobility Operations, Reporting, 388th TacticalSupport Wing, Vandenberg 106th and 109th Tactical Fighter Wing, [till AFB, UTAFB, CA (1/29/90) Control Squadrons, Utah Air (1/03/90)

National Guard, Salt Lake340-0-06 Controls Over City, UT (11/03/89) 405-0-16 Management ofMilitary Family Housing Subsistence-in-Kind, OgdenExpenditures, 4392d 405-0-07 Air Force Freight Air Logistics Center, l ill AFB,Aerospace Support Wing, Traffic Management, Ogden UT (1/04/90)Vandenberg AFB, CA (1/29/90) Air Logistics Center, I fill AFB,

UT (Project 9126117) 405-0-17 Management of340-0-07 Followup, Review of (11/14/89) Subsistence-in-Kind, 388th

C-22

Tactical Fighter Wing, lfill Ogden Air Logistics Center, Collecting Area, Kelly AFB,

AFB, UT (1/12/90) I Iill AFB, UT (3/07/90) TX (12/14/89)

405-0-18 Pollowup, Controls 405-0-27 Followup on 410-0-04 Replenishment

Over Conventional Munitions, Contracting for Maintenance Spares Procurement Lead

Ogden Air Logistics Center, and Logistics Support for Times and Delivery Schedules,

Hill AFB, UT (Project Aircrew Training Devices, Kelly AFB, TX (Project

9136110) (1/26/90) Ogden Air Logistics Center, 9126115) (10/17/89)Hill AFB, UT (Project

405-0-19 Followup, 9046414) (3/08/90) 410-0-05 Management of local

Management of the lill AFB Manufacture of Economic

Museum, Ogden Air Logistics 405-0-28 Economic Order Order Quantity (EOQ) Items,

Center, llill AFB, UT (1/31/90) Quantity (EOQ) Buy/Budget Kelly AFB, TuX (10/17/89)

Computation System (1)062)

405-0-20 Managementof Quantitative Requirements, 410-0-06 MC-130 Combat

Condemnedfrerminal Ogden Air Logistics Center, Talon II Logistics Support

Airmunitions, Ogden Air Hill AFB, UT (Project Management, Kelly AFB, TX

Logistics Center, I till AFB, UT 9126121) (3/09/90) (Project 9036311) (10/26/89)

(2/02/90)405-0-29 Review of Depot 410-0-07 Management of the

405-0-21 Followup of Medical Maintenance Management Ground Launched Cruise

Insurance Billing and Information System (DMMIS) Missile Drawdown, Kelly APB,

Reimbursement, Ogden Air Implementation Activities, TX (Project 9036317)

Logistics Center, Hill AFB, UT Ogden Air Logistics Center, (11/01/89)

(2/13/90) Hill AFB, uT (Project0196624) (3/13/90) 410-0-08 Review of Air Force

405-0-22 Air Force Planning Aviation Fuel Financial

for Tactical Munitions Support 405-0-30 Fiscal Year (FY) 91 Management, Kelly AFB, TX

During Contingencies, 419th Budget Estimate Submission (Project 9265317) (11/09/89)

Tactical Fighter Wing for Aircraft Replenishment(AFRES), Ilill APB, UT Spares, Ogden Air Logistics 410-0-09 Review of Air Force

(Project 0085213) (2/28/90) Center, IHill AFB, UT (3/14/90) Aviation Fuel FinancialManagement, Kelly AFB, TX

405-0-23 Followup, Aircraft 405-0-31 Followupon (Project 9265317) (11/09/89)

Tires Acquisition and Contracting for Reliability and

Distribution Management, Maintainability in AFLC 410-0-10 Resource Advisor

Ogden Air Logistics Center, Modification Programs, Ogden Management of Travel Funds,

[fill AFB, UT (3/01/90) Air Logistics Center, Hill AFB, Kelly AFB, TX (11/17/89)UT (3/15/90)

405-0-24 Depot Maintenance 410-0-11 Controlling

Material Requirements, Odgen 410-0-01 Review of Delinquent Deliveries for Air

Air Logistics Center, Hill AFB, Administrative Leadtimes in Force Logistics Command

UT (Project 9106211) (3/02/90) the EOQ Buy Budget Spare Parts Contracts, Kelly

Computation ()062) System, A FB, TX (Project 9076413)

405-0-25 Air FreightTerminal Kelly AFB, TX (10/02/89) (12/05/89)

Vehicle Allowances, Ogden AirLogistics Center, IHill AFB, UT 410-0-02 Review of Chaplain 410-0-12 Air Force Freight

(Project 0226110) (3/05/90) Fund Management, Kelly raIMIC Management, Kelly

APB, TX (10/02/89) AFB, TX (Project 9226117)

405-0-26 Managementof (12/14/89)

Contractor Logistics Support 410-0-03 Accounting and

Recompetition Support Finance (AI)SN 5043), 410-0-13 Air Force

Packages for Training Devices, Management of Paying and Management of Undefinitized

C-23

Contractual Actions, Kelly Weather Reconnaissance 415-0-14 Management ofAFB, TX (Project 9046413) Squadron Assets, McClellan Vehicle Maintenance,(10/10/89) A FB, CA (10/10/89) McClellan AFB, CA (1/09/90)

410-0-14 Management of 415-0-05 lazardous Material 415-0-15 Review of LetterBilled Not Received Details for Identification, Handlingand Contracts, McClellan AFB, CAStock Fund Items, Kelly AFB, Control Procedures, McClellan (1/16/90)TX (12/26/89) A FB, CA (10/16/89)

415-0-16 Management of Base410-0-15 Depot Maintenance 415-0-06 Management ofthe Fuels, McClellan AFB, CAMaterial Requirements, Kelly Depot Maintenance Quality (1/16/90)AFB, TX (Project 9106211) Assurance Program, McClellan(2/06/90) APB, CA (Project 9106216) 415-9-17 Management of the

(10/26/89) Ground Launched Cruise410-0-16 Cooperative Logistics Missile Drawdown,Supply Support Arrangements, 415-0-07 Managementof Sacramento Air LogisticsKelly AFB, TX (2/09/90) Medical War Reserve Materiel, Center, McClellan AFB, CA

McClellan AFB, CA (11/13/89) (Project 9036317)410-0-17 Management of the (1/17/90)Depot Maintenance Quality 415-0-08 Management ofAssurance Program, Kelly Civilian Overtime, McClellan 415-0-18 Management ofAFB, TX (Project 9106216) A FB, CA (11/22/89) Adjusted Stock Levels,(2/27/90) McClellan AFB, CA

415-0-09 Management of Local (REVISED) (1/19/90)410-0-18 Management of the Purchase Equipmen. ItemSimplified Acquisition Base Under Warranty, McClellan 415-0-19 ManagementoftheEngineering Requirements AFB, CA (12/18/89) Civil Engineering Self-Help(SABER) Program, Kelly AFP, Program, McClellan AFB, CATX (3/09/90) 415-0-10 Followupof (1/29/90)

Management of the Simplified410-0-19 Managementofthe Acquisition Base Engineering 415-0-20 Validity ofT56 Engine Maintenance Requirements (SABER) Requirements ComputationsProgram, Kelly APB, TX Contract, McClellan AFB, CA and Funds Obligations for the(Project 9106214) (3/19/90) (12/19/89) Acquisition of Recoverable/

Investment Spares, McClellan415-0-01 Repair Versus 415-0-11 Standard Base APB, CA (1/30/90)Purchase of Electric Motors, Supply System (SBSS)McClellan AFB, CA (10/03/89) Training and Customer 415-0-21 Review of Urgent

Liaison, McClellan AF, CA Purchase Requests, McClellan415-0-02 Adjustments of Depot (12/19/89) AFB, CA (2/09/90)Purchased Equipment Main-tenance (DPEM) Exchangeable 415-0-12 Productivity, 415-0-22 Management ofRepair Requirements, Reliability, Availability, and Equipment, McClellan AFB,McClellan APB, CA (Project Maintainability (PRAM) CA (2/20/90)9126112) (10/10/89) Program, McClellan APB, CA

(12/21/89) 415-0-23 Requirements415-0-03 Replenishment Computations for RecoverableSpvare Procureme-nt.' Lad 415-0-i3 Managementof the Items, McClellan APR, CATimes and Delivery Schedules, McClellan Commissary (3/02/90)McClellan AFB, CA (Project Produce Department and9126115) (10/10/89) Customer Service Department, 415-0-24 Management ofthe

McClellan AFB, CA FX 3104 Account, SM-AILC,415-0-04 Management of 55th (12/29/89) McClellan APB, CA (3/07/90)

C-24

425-0-01 Missile 425-0-09 Managementof the 425-0-18 Review of

Accountability and Reporting Federal Managers' Financial Requisition Delivery

(U), Robins AFB, GA (10/02/89) Integrity Act - FY 1989, 94 Priorities, Warner Robins Air

(CLASSIFIEI)) Combat Support Group, Logistics Center, Robins AFB,

Dobbins AFB, GA (Project GA (12/21/89)

425-0-02 Use ofTime and 9265320) (11/13/89)

Materials Contracts, Warner 425-0-19 Management of FX

Robins Air Logistics Center, 425-0-10 Management of 2065 Special Inventory

Robins AFB, GA (10/10/89) Noncompetitive Acquisitions Account, Warner Robins Air

Between $100,000 and Logistics Center, Robins AFB,

425-0-03 Review of Base-Level $500,000, Warner Robins Air GA (12/26/89)

Planning for 2nd-Year Logistics Center, Robins AFB,

Personnel Concept Ill (PC Ill) GA (11/27/89) 425-0-20 F-I5 Aircraft Item

Implementation Sites, Warner Requirements Review, Warner

Robins Air Logistics Center, 425-0-1 Implementation of In- Robins Air Logistics Center,

Robins APB, GA (Project I louse Commercial Activity Robins AFB, GA (1/04/90)

9195422) (10/11/89) Decisions, Dobbins AFB, GA(Project 9305111) (11/28/89) 425-0-21 Accuracy of Selected

425-0-04 Review of Internal Aircraft Wartime Spares

Controls Over the Local 425-0-12 Management ofthe Requirements, Warner Robins

Manufacturing Process, Individual Equipment Unit, Air Logistics Center, Robins

Warner Robins Air Logistics Base Supply (FB 2067), WR- AFB, GA (Project 9126116)

Center, Robins AFB, GA ALC, Robins AFB, GA (1/22/90)

(10/12/89) (12/08/89)425-0-22 Repair of Items in

425-0-05 Replenishment 425-0-13 Management of Long Supply, Warner Robint;

Spares Procurement Lead Technical Orders, Warner Air Logistics Center, Robins

Times and Delivery Schedules, Robins Air Logistics Center, AFB, GA (1/26/90)

Warner Robins Air Logistics Robins AFB, GA (12/08/89)Center, Robins APB, GA 425-0-23 Economic Order

(Project 9126115) 425-0-14 Followup on Air Quantity (EOQ) Buy/Budget

(10/13/89) Force Initiatives to Reduce Computation System (D062),Transatlantic Strategic Airlift Warner Robins Air Logistics

425-0-06 Controlling Requirements, Warner Robins Center, Robins AFB, GA

Delinquent Deliveries for Air Air Logistics Center, Robins (Project 9126121) (2/14/90)

Force Logistics Command APB, GA (Project 9085215)Spare Parts Contracts, Warner (12/15/89) 425-0-24 Requirements for

Robins Air Logistics Center, Aircraft Guns and Gun

Robins AFB, GA (Project 425-0-15 Management of Components, Warner Robins

9076413) (10/30/89) Medical Logistics, USAF Air Logistics Center, Robins

I lospital, Robins APB, GA APB, GA (2/16/90)

425-0-07 Management of the (12/18/89)Federal Managers' Financial 425-0-25 Review of Civil

Integrity Act- Fiscal Year 425-0-16 Managementof Base Engineering Contract Quality,

1989, IQ Air Force Reserve, Telecom.anications, Warner Warner Robins Air Logistics

Robins AFB, GA (Project Robins itir Logistics Center, Center, Robins AFB, GA

9265320) (11/03/89) Robins AFB, GA (12/19/89) (3/01/90)

425-0-08 Review of 425-0-17 Review of 425-0-26 Review of Controls

Requisition Delivery Requisition Delivery Over Selected Bulk Issue

Priorities, 19th Air Refueling Priorities, 5th Combat Production Materials, Warner

Wing, Robins AFB, GA Communications Group, Robins Air Logistics Center,

(11/09/89) Robins APB, GA (12/20/89) Robins AFB, GA (3/08/90)

C-25

425-0-27 Management of 440-0-10 Management of Responsibilities Program, 3rdAdjusted Stock Levels,(FB Permissive TDY, OC-ALC, Combat Communications2067), 19th Air Refueling Tinker AFB, OK (11/21/89) Group, Tinker AFB, OKWing, Robins AFB, GA (Project 9165117) (1/17/90)(3/12/90) 440-0-11 Management of the

Commissary Meat 440-0-21 Management of425-0-28 Management of Department, Tinker APB, OK Dependent CareDepot Field Teams, Warner (11/27/89) Responsibilities Program,Robins Air Logistics Center, 137th ''actical Airlift Wing,Robins AFB, GA (3/19/90) 440-0-12 Management of Air National Guard (ANG),

Permissive TDY, Tinker AFB OK (Project 9165117) (1/17/90)440-0-01 Followup OK (11/29/89)Management of Base 440-0-22 Followup of Use ofTelephone Operations, Tinker 440-0-13 Civilian Time and Time-and-Materials ContractsAFB, OK (10/02/89) Attendance Accounting, OC- Within APLC, OC-ALC,

ALC, Tinker AFB, OK Tinker AFB, OK (Project440-0-02 Management of (11/29/89) 9076415) (1/24/90)Permissive TI)Y, 'Pinker APB,OK ( 0/02/89) 440-0-14 Air Force Use of 440-0-23 Accuracy of Selected

Communications Service Aircraft Wartime Spares440-0-03 Followup Authorizations to Acquire Requirements, OC-ALC,Management of A-7 Materiels, Telecommunication Equip- Tinker AFB, OK (ProjectOC-ALC, Tinker AFB, OK ment and Services, I IQ 9126116) (1/25/90)(10/06/89) Engineering Installation

Division, 'rinker AFB, OK 440-0-24 Management of440-0-04 Management of (Project 9066412) (12/08/89) Dependent CarePermissive TI)Y, Tinker AFB, Responsibilities Program,OK (10/16/89) 440-0-15 Management of EID 507th Tactical Fighter Group

Inventory Account FB 3101, (TFG), 'Pinker AFB OK,440-0-05 Management of Tinker APB, OK (12/08/89) (Project 9165117) (1/25/90)Copier Maintenance, OC-ALC,Tinker AFB, OK ( 0/20/89) 440-0-16 Replenishment 440-0-25 Variable I lousing

Spares Procurement Lead Allowance Payments to440-0-06 -Controlling Times and Delivery Schedules, Military Members SharingDelinquent Deliveries for Air OC-AIC, Tinker AFB, OK Residences, OC-A LC, TinkerForce Logistics Command (Project 9126115) (12/11/89) APB, OK (1/26/90)Spare Parts Contracts, TinkerAFB, OK (Project 9076413) 440-0-17 Managementof 440-0-26 Managementof(10/30/89) Permissive TI)Y, Tinker AFB, Dependent Care

OK (12/11/89) Responsibilities Program, OC-440-0-07 Management of ALC, 'Pinker AFB, OK (ProjectPermissive TDY, Tinker AFB, 440-0-18 Review of Additives 9165117) (1/29/90)OK (10/30/89) in Recoverable Item Require-

ment Computations, OC-ALC, 440-0-27 Application of Over440-0-08 Management of Tinker AFB, OK (12/12/89) and Above Costs to Unit SalesConventional Munitions, 507th Prices, OC-ALC, Tinker AFB,Tactical Fighter Group (TFG), 440-0-19 Air FreightTerminal OK (2/01/90)'Pinker APE, OK (11/15/89) Vehicle AlInancs, 0C A L,

Tinker APE, OK (Project 440-0-28 Followup of440-0-09 Management of 0226110) (1/12/90) Management of Cash and CashConventional Munitions, OC- Assets, Officers' Open MessALC, Tinker AFB, OK 440-0-20 Management of (OOM), Tinker AFB, OK(11/21/89) Dependent Care (2/06/90)

C-26

440-0-29 Review of Medical Requirements, IIQ Air Force Tactical Fighter Wing,

Food Service, OC-ALC, Tinker Logistics Command (AFLC), England AFB, LA (11/06/89)

AFB, OK (2/13/90) WPAFB, OH (Project 9085215)(12/29/89) 504-0-04 Management of

440-0-30 Depot Maintenance Billeting, 23d Tactical Fighter

Material Requirements, 445-0-05 Management of the Wing, England AFB, LA

Tinker AFB, OK (Project Base Dining Ilall, 2750th Air (11/09/89)

9106211) (2/21/90) Base Wing, WPAFB, OIl(1/10/90) 504-0-05 Management of Base

440-0-31 Management of Supply (SRAN 4857), Local

Dependent Care 445-0-06 Management of the Purchase Requisitioning, 67th

Responsibilities Program, 28th Individual Equipment Unit, Tactical RLonnaissance Wing,

Air Division, Tinker AFB, OK 2750th Air Base Wing, Bergstrom AFB, TX (11/30/89)

(Project 9165117) (2/23/90) WPAFB, OH (2/07/90) 504-0-06 Satellite Pharmacy

440-0-32 Followup on 445-0-07 Contracting for Operations, 67th ''actical

Management of Adjusted Stock Travel Services, Wright- Reconnaissance Wing,

Levels, OC-ALC,'Tinker AFB, Patterson Contracting Center, Bergstrom AFB,'TX (Project

OK (2/28/90) WPAFB, Oil (Project 9076414) 9325116) (12/08/89)(2/08/90)

440-0-33 Review of the Use of 504-0-07 Management of

Data Supporting Solicitation 445-0-08 Followup, Billeting, 924th Tactical

Packages, OC-ALC, Tinker Management of COMSEC Fighter Group, Bergstrom

AFB, OK (2/28/90) Material, 178th Commun- AFB, TX (12/12/89)ications Flight (Support), Ohio

440-0-34 Management of the ANG, Springfield-Beckley 504-0-08 Management of

Depot Maintenance Quality Municipal Airport, OH (Project Billeting, 67th Tactical

Assurance Program, Tinker 0205215) (2/22/90) Reconnaissance Wing,

AFB, OK (Project 9106216) Bersgtrom AFB, TX (1/02/90)

(3/07/90) 445-0-09 Personal PropertyMovement and Control, 2750th 504-0-09 Review of Software

445-0-01 Followup, Air Base Wing, WPAFB, OH Testing at the Standard

Contracting for Maintenance (2/22/90) Systems Center, 67th Tactical

and Logistics Support for Reconnaissance Wing,

Aircrew'Training Devices, I IQ 445-0-10 Contracting for Bergstrom AFB, TX (Project

Air Force Logistics Command Travel Services, 2750th Air 9195423) (1/17/90)

(AFLC), WPAFB, Oil (Project Base Wing, WPAFB, 0119046414) (11/21/89) (Project 9076414) (2/26/90) 504-0-10 Management of

Blanket Purchase Agreements

445-0-02 Air Force 445-0-11 Followup, Use of (BPAs) for Contract Quarters,

Implementation of the Federal Time-and-Materials Contracts 23d Tactical Fighter Wing,

Managers' Financial Integrity Within AFLC, Wright- England AFB, LA (REVISED)

Act - FY 1989, 1 IQ Air Force Patterson Contracting Center, (1/26/90)

Logistics Command, WPAFB, WPAFB, Oil (Project 9076415)Of I (Project 9265320) (3/16/90) 504-0-11 Followup--

(11/22/89) Management of Medical504-0-01 Billeting - Cash Materiel, 67th Tactical

445-0-03 Base Inflight Controls, 67th ''actical Reconnaissance Wing

Kitchen, 2750th Air Base Reconnaissance Wing, Hospital, Bergstrom AFB, TX

Wing, WPAFB, 011 (12/29/89) Bersgtrom AFB,TX (10/02/89) (1/31/90)

445-0-04 Followup, Air Force 504-0-02 Followup, Control of 509-0-01 Management of

Initiatives to Reduce Hospital Sensitive Resources, Aircraft Cannibalization Pro-

Transatlantic Strategic Airlift 23d Tactical I lospital, 23d gram, 27th Tactical Fighter

C-27

Wing (TPW), Cannon AFB, Life Support Program, 41st Service Contracts, Post AwardNM (10/01/89) Electronic Combat Squadron, Process, 831st Air Division,

Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ George AB, CA (10/10/89)509-0-02 Followup of Manage- (12/15/89)ment of Adjusted Stock Levels 535-0-05 Management of(FE 4855), 27th Tactical Fight- 516-0-05 Management of the Billeting Sundry Sales, 831ster Wing (TW), Cannon AFB, Ground Launched Cruise Air Division, George AFB, CANM (10/31/89) Missile Drawdown, 868th (10/13/89)

Tactical Missile Training509-0-03 Managementof the Group, 836th Air Division, 535-0-06 Followup onLocal Purchase Program, 27th Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ Management ofTravelTactical Fighter Wing (TFW), (Project 9036317) (12/28/89) Expenditures (ADSN 6626),Cannon AFB, NM (12/29/89) 831 st Air Division, George

516-0-06 Accountability for AFB, CA (10/27/89)509-0-04 Implementation of Parts Removed from Aircraft,In-I louse Commercial Activity Aerospace Maintenance and 535-0-07 Management ofDecisions, 27th Tactical Fight- Regeneration Center, Davis- Accounting and Finance -er Wing (TFW), Cannon AFB, Monthan AF3, AZ (2/12/90) Commercial Services (AI)SNNM (Project 9305111) (1/31/90) 6626), 831st Air Division,

516-0-07 Management of George AP1, CA (10/27/89)509-0-05 Management of the Schedule II Controlled Drugs,Local Purchase Program, 64th 836th Air Division, Davis- 535-0-08 Management ofFlying Training Wing (FTW), Monthan AFB, AZ (3/07/90) Vehicle Maintenance, 831stReese AFB, TX (3/05/90) Air Division, George AFB, CA

516-0-08 Management of lt-3 (11/20/89)509-0-06 Management ofthe Time Change Items, 71stInstallation Civilian Training Special Operations Squadron 535-0-09 Management ofProgram, 64th Flying Training (AFRES), l)avis-Monthan Travel Vouchers, 831st AirWing (FTW), Reese AFB, TX APB, AZ (3/19/90) Division, George AF1 CA(3/08/90) i 11/22/89)

516-0-09 Implementation of509-0-07 Managementof In-Ilouse Commercial Activity 535-0-10 Effectiveness ofSupport Agreements, 64th )ecisions, 836th Air Division, Maintenance ManagementFlying Training Wing (FTW), l)avis-Monthan AFB, AZ Support Functiens, 83 1 st AirReese AFB, TX (3/08/90) (Project 9035111) (3/19/90) Division, George APE3, CA

(1/05/90)516-0-01 Administration of 535-0-01 Management of theBase Level Service Contracts, Report of Survey Program, 535-0-11 Managementof836th Air Division, Davis- 831st Air Division, George AB, Special Purpose RecoverablesMonthan AP, AZ (10/02/89) CA (10/02/89) Authorized Maintenance

(SPRAM), 831st Air Division,516-0-02 Managementof 535-0-02 Managementof George AFB, CA (1/05/90)Operational Rations, 836th Air Aircraft DeferredDivision, l)avis-Monthan AFB, l)iscrepancies, 831st Air 535-0-12 Management of theAZ (10/02/89) Division, George AFB, CA Small Arms Serialized Control

(10/02/89) Program, 831st Air Division,516-0-03 Management of the George AFB, CA (1/19/90)Life Support Program, 23d 535-0-03 Management of theTactical Air Support Squadron, Combat Follow-On Supply 535-0-13 Planning for TacticaiDavis-Monthan AFB, AZ Support System (FB 4812',, Munitions Support During(11/08/89) George A FP1, CA (10/03/89) Contingencies, 831st Air

Division, George AFB, CA516-0-04 Managementofthe 535-0-04 Managementof (03/15/90)

C-28

535-0-14 Fabrication Branch - NM (1/08/90) Supply (PB 4800),

Local Manufacture, 831st Air Management of Air Force

Division, George AFB, CA 540-0-09 Managementofthe Logistics Conmand (AFLC)

(3/15/90) Drug Testing Program, 833d Critical Items andAir Division, Ilolloman AFB, Base/Command Intensively

535-0-15 Followupon NM (1/25/90) Managed Critical Items, 1st

Management of the Resource, Tactical Fighter Wing,

Recovery and Recycling 540-0-10 Managementofthe Langley AFB, VA (10/06/89)

Program, 831st Air Division, Time Change Items, 49thGeorge AFB, CA (3/16/90) Tactical Fighter Wing, 545-0-03 Accounting and

I lolloman APB, NM (2/20/90) Finance (ADSN 6707), Cash

540-0-01 Accounting and Accountability and Internal

Finance (ADSN 6748), 540-0-11 Management of Controls, Langley APB, VA

Management of Paying and Mobility Planning (U), 833d (Project 9265312) (10/06/89)

Collecting, 833d Air Division, Security Police Squadron,Holloman AFB, NM (10/06/89) Ilolloman AFB, NM (2/21/90) 545-0-04 Military Working

(CLASSIFIEg) Dogs, LstTactical Fighter

540-0-02 ManagementCo Wing, Langley AFIB, VA

Research, Development, Test, 540-0-12 Management of (10/06/89)

and Evaluation Obligations, Mobility Planning (U), 4th833d Air Division, IHolloman Satellite Communications 545-0-05 Management of Meal

AFB, NM (10/16/89) Squadron (4SCS), Ilolloman and Incidental ExpenseAFB, NM (2/23/90) Allowances Paid to Temporary

540-0-03 Management of (CLASSIFIED) Duty (Tl)Y) Enlisted

Research, Development, Test, Personnel, 1st'Tactical Fighter

and Evaluation Obligations, 540-0-13 Review of Environ- Wing, Langley AF, VA

6585th Test Group, llollomen mental Pollution Prevention, (10/18/89)

AFB, NM (10/30/89) Control, and Abatement,6585th Test Group, Holloman 545-0-06 Accounting and

540-0-04 Management of 463L AFB, NM (Project 0175214) Finance (ADSN 6707),

Pallets and Nets, 833d Air (3/08/90) Accounts Control Subject

Division, Ilolloman AB, NM Matter Area, Management of

(11/29/89) 540-0-14 Followup on Man- the General Accounting andagement of Medical Logistics, Finance System, 1stTactical

540-0-05 Physical Security 833d Air Division, I lolloman Fighter Wing, Langley APB,

and Accountability for" Small APB, NM (3/13/90) VA (10/20/89)Arms, 833d Air Division,I lolloman APB, NM (Project 540-0-15 Accountability of 545-0-07 Followup of

9205216) (12/11/89) 1 larvest Bare Assets, 4449th Management of the Base CivilMobility Support Squadron, Engineer (BCE) Self-I lelp

540-0-06 Managementof Ilolloman AFB, NM (3/13/90) Program, IstTactical Fighter

Adjusted Stock Levels (FB Wing, Langley AFB, VA

4801), 833d Air Division, 540-0-16 Management of the (10/25/89)

Ilolloman AFB, NM Defense Enrollment Eligibility

(12/11/89) Reporting System, 833d Air 545-0-08 Review of StatutorilyDivision, tlolloman APB, NM Required Explanations of

540-0-07 Managen'io. ofTime (3/14/90) Specified Articles of the

Compliance Technical Orders, Uniform Code of Military

49th Tactical Fighter Wing, 545-0-01 Accounting for Justice (UCMJ, Article 137),

llolloman AFB, NM (12/21/89) Deployed Equipment, 1st Ist Tactical Fighter Wing,Tactical Fighter Wing, Langley APB, VA (10/26/89)

540-0-08 Management of the Langley AF, VA (10/02/89)

Drug Testing Program, 6585th 545-0-09 Ground-Launched

Test Group, Holloman AFB, 545-0-02 Followup of Base Cruise Missile I)rawdown, I IQ

C-29

Tactical Air Command, Program, Ist Tactical Fighter Initiatives to ReduceLangley AFB, VA (Project Wing, Langley AFB, VA Transatlantic Strategic Airlift9036317) (11/07/89) (12/19/89) Requirements, I IQ TAC,

Langley AFB, VA (Project

545-0-10 Air Force 545-0-18 Physical Security 9085215) (1/31/90)Implementaltion of the Federal and Accountability for SmallManagers' Financial Integrity Arms, IstTactical Fighter 545-0-27 Software Testing atAct- Fiscal Year 1989, HQ Wing, Langley AFB, VA the Standard Systems Center,Tactical Air Command, (Porject 9205216) (12/19/89) 1stTactical Fighter Wing,Langley AFB, VA (Project Langley AFB, VA (Project9265320) (11/14/89 545-0-19 Managementofthe 9195423) (2/02/90)

Life Support Program, 1st545-0-Il Followup of Tactical Fighter Wing, 545-0-28 Management ofManagement of the Air Force Langley AFB, VA (12/20/89) Vehicle Operations--FleetSecurity Policy Mobility Management, I st TacticalProgram, I st Tactical Fighter 545-0-20 Management of Fighter Wing, Langley AFB,Vying, Langley AFB, VA I lazardous Materials and VA (2/07/90)(11/15/89) Waste, 1st Tactical Fighter

Wing, Langley AFB, VA 545-0-29 Military Personnel -545-0-12 Selected Aspects of (1/04/90) Line of Duty and Misconductthe Energy Security Program - Determination Programs, I stManagement of Emergency 545-0-21 Management of Tactical Fighter Wing,Generators, HIQ Tactical Air Dependent Care Langley APB, VA (2/08/90)Command, Langley AFB, VA Responsibilities Program, IIQ(Project 9205215) (11/22/89) Tactical Air Command and 1st 545-0-30 Management of

Tactical Fighter Wing, Contract Repair Services, 1st545-0-13 Management of Langley AFB, VA (Project Tactical Fighter Wing,Blanket Purchase Agreements, 9165117) (1/04/90) Langley AFB, VA (2/27/90)1st Tactical Fighter Wing,Langley AFB, VA (11/22/89) 545-0-22 Base Supply, 545-0-31 Review of Air Force

Management of Ground Fuels, Contractor Operated Parts545-0-14 Followupof I st Tactical Fighter Wing, Store, 1stTactical FighterContracting for Maintenance Langley AFB, VA (1/08/90) Wing, Langley AFB, VAand Logistics Support for (2/28/90)Aircrew Training Devices, ItQ 545-0-23 Management ofTactical Air Command, Transient Quarters, 1st 545-0-32 Followup ofLangley AFB, VA (Project Tactical Fighter Wing, Management of Controlled9046414) (11/22/89) Langley AFB, VA (1/26/90) Drugs, IstTactical Fighter

Wing, Langley AFB, VA545-0-I5 Quality Assurance 545-0-24 Evaluation of (3/09/90)Program Management, 1st , Controls Over BudgetTactical Fighter Wing, Execution of the Operations 545-0-33 Base Supply (FBLangley AFB, VA (11/28/89) and Maintenance (0&M) 4800), Management of

Appropriation, IIQ Tactical Air Inventory Adjustments, 1st545-0-16 Accounting and Command, Langley AFB, VA Tactical Fighter Wing,Finance (A I)SN 6707), (Project 0255316) (1/26/90) Langley AFB, VA (3/12/90)Management of the MaterielSubject Matter Area, 1st 545-0-25 Managementof 545-0-34 Management ofTactical Fighter Wing, Civilian Personnel Retirement, Morale, Welfare, andLangley AFB, VA (12/07/89) 1 st Tactical Fighter Wing, Recreation Operations-

Langley APE, VA (1/29/90) Marina, Ist Tactical Fighter545-0-17 Management of the Wing, Langley A 1B, VACivilian Injury Compensation 545.0-26 ,ollowup of Air Force (Project 9285112) (3/20/90)

C-30

550-0-01 Management of Base Tactical Training Wing, Operations - Cash Controls andCommissary Store, Williams MacDill AFB, FL (10/05189) Advance Green Fees, 56thA FB, AZ (10/02/89) Tactical Training Wing,

555-0-02 Management of Macl)ill AFB, FL (3/09/90)550-0-02 UnitTraining Medical Supply Operations,Assembly Management, 944th 56th Tactical Training Wing, 555-0-12 Management of BasicTactical Fighter Group, Air MacDill AFB, FL (10/06/89) Allowance for Quarters andForce Reserve, Luke AFB, AZ Variable I lousing Allowance(10/02/89) 555-0-03 Management of Entitlements for Single

Small Computers, 56th Members, 31st Tactical Fighter550-0-03 Followupon Tactical Training Wing, Wing, I lomestead AFB, FLManagement of Depot MacDill APB, FL (11/30/89) (3/16/90)Reparable Assets, 58thTactical Training Wing, Luke 555-0-04 Local Purchase of 560-0-01 Management ofAFB, AZ (10/30/89) Supplies, 56th ractical Special Purpose Recoverables

Training Wing, MaeDill APB, Authorized to Maintenance550-0-04 Management of FL (12/11/89) (SPRAM), 366 Tactical FighterMilitary Family I lousing Wing, Mt I lome AFB, I1)(MFII) Maintenance Contract, 555-0-05 Management of Base (10/11/89)82d Flying Training Wing, Munitions, 56th TacticalWilliams APB, AZ (1/19/90) Training Wing, MacDill AFB, 560-0-02 Imprest Fund

Fl. (12/15/89) Operations, Detachment 5, 1 st550-0-05 Management of Land Electronic Combat RangeMobile Radios, 2037th 555-0-06 Management of Civil Group (SAC), Wilder AFS, IDCommunications Squadron, Engineering Materials, 31st (10/11/89)Luke AFB, AZ (2/09/90) Tactical Fighter Wing,

Homestead AFB, Fl, (1/19/90) 560-0-03 Selected Aspects of550-0-06 Evaluation of the the Energy Security ProgramInstallation Civilian Training 555-0-07 Managementof Management of EmergencyProgram, 82d Flying Training Mobility Operations, 71st Generators, Mt Home AFB, II)Wing, Williams AFB, AZ Tactical Control Squadron, (Project 9205215)(2/15/90) MacDill AFB, FL (1/23/90) (10/24/89)

550-0-07 Exchange of Air 555-0-08 Management of 560-0-04 Followup ofForce Property With Pharmacy Operations, 56th Management of the Do-It-Commercial Sources, 832d Air Tactical Training Wing, Yourself (DITY) MoveDivision, Luke AFB, AZ Macl)ill AFB, Fl, (Project Program, 366th Tactical(2/20/90) 9325116) (2'15/90) Fighter Wing, Mt I lome AFB,

I1) (11106/89)

550-0-08 Managementof 555-0-09 Management of AirAirframe Time Compliance Force Official Representation 560-0-05 Management of theTechnical Order (TCTO) Kits, Contingency Funds - FY 1989, Contractor Operated Parts58th Tactical Training Wing, United States Special Store (COPARS) Contract,Luke AF1, AZ (Project Operations Command, MacDill 366th Tactical Fighter Wing,0106217) (3/06/90) AI"B, F 1. (Project 0205212) Mt I lome AB, ID (1 1/06/89)

(2/26/90)50-01-69 Overseois Workload 560-0-06 1mprest Fund

Program, 832d Air Division, 555-0-10 Management of Operations, 366th TacticalLuke AFB, AZ (Project Vehicle Maintenance, 31st Fighter Wing, Mt Home AFB,0106211) (312/90) Tactical Fighter Wing, 11) (11/08/89)

I lomestead AFB, FL (3/01/90)555-0-01 Golf Course 560-0-07 Management ofOperations, Cash Controls and 555-0-11 Followup of Pharmacy Operations, 366thAdvance Green Fees, 56th Management of Golf Course Tactical Fighter Wing, Mt

C-31

Home AFB, II) (Project Support Wing, Nellis AFB, NV 565-0-10 Review of Selected9325116) (12/12/89) (10/02/89) Commissary Internal Controls,

Det 116, Nellis AFB Commis-560-0-08 Review of Base 565-0-02 Review of sary, Nellis AFB, NV, (1/30/90)Comprehensive Plans, 366th Communications-ElectronicsTactical Fighter Wing, Mt Management Staff Support, 565-0-11 Physical SecurityIIome AFB, ID (12/19/89) 2069th Communications and Accountability for Small

Group, Nellis AFB, NE Arms, 554th Operations560-0-09 Followup of (10/11/89) Support Wing, Nellis AFB, NVContracting for Maintenance (Project 9205216) (1/30/90)and Logistics Support for 565-0-03 Adequacy of CivilianAircrew Training Devices Injury Compensation Program 565-0-12 Management of the(ATI)s), 366th Tactical Fighter Administration, 554th Opera- Regional Equipment TrainingWing, Mt I lome AFB, I D tions Support Wing, Nellis Site (RETS), 554th Operations(Project 9046414) (12/21/89) AFB, NV(1 1/07/89) Support Wing, Nellis AFB, NV

(2/02/90)560-0-10 Followup, 565-0-04 Followup ofManagement of Aviation Fuel Management of the 565-0-13 Effectiveness of BasePeacetime Requirements and Coordination of Benefits Freight Operations, 554thInventories, 366th Tactical Program, 554th Operations Operations Support Wing,Fighter Wing, Mt I lome AFB, Support Wing, Nellis AFB, NV Nellis AFB, NV (3/19/90)II) (Project 0126120) (1/03/90) (12/08/89)

570-0-01 Contracting for560-0-11 Foilowup of Military 565-0-05 Management of Food Travel Services, 4th TacticalFamily I lousing Contract, Service Controls, 554th Fighter Wing, Seymour366th Tactical Fighter Wing, Operations Support Wing, Johnson A FB, NC (ProjectMt I lome AFB, ID (2/01/90) Nellis AFB, NV (1Z/13/89) 9076414) (10/16/89)

560-0-12 Morale, Welfare, and 565-0-06 Managementof 570-0-02 Air ForceRecreation (MWR) Equipment Airframe Time Compliance Implementation of the FederalManagement, Detachment 5, Technical Order (TCTO) Kits, Managers' Financial Integrity1st Electronic Combat Range USAF Tactical Fighter Act - FY 1989, 4th'racticalGroup (SAC), Wilder AFS, II) Weapons Center, Nellis AFB, Fighter Wing, Seymour(2/20/90) NV (Project 0106217) Johnson AFB, NC (Project

(12/28/89) 9265320) (11/17/89)560-0-13 Followup, Review ofEnvironmental Pollution 565-0-07 Billeting Asset 570-0-03 Accuracy of MilitaryPrevention, Control, and Management, 554th Pay and Travel PaymentsAbatement, 366th Tactical Operations Support Wing, I)uring Exercise Participation,Fighter Wing, Mt lome AFB, Nellis AFB, NV (1/09/90) 4th Tactical Fighter Wing,I ) (Project 0175214) (2/21/90) Seymour Johnson AFB, NC

565-0-08 Management of (11/30/89)560-0-14 Morale, Welfare, and llostfl'enant SupportRecreation (MWR) Equipment Agreements, 554th Operations 570-0-04 Review of PromptManagement Support for Support Wing, Nellis AFB, NV Payment Act Provisions, 354thDetachment 5, 1 st Electronic (1/22/90) Tactical Fighter Wing, Myrtle

a t 11 a . g -uGr.US, ,1^,C, Beach AiI-, SC (1/04190)366th Tactical Fighter Wing, 565-0-09 Management of theMt Ilome AFB, 11) (3/16/90) Regional EquipmentTraining 570-0-05 Management of

Site (RETS), 820th REI) Selected Contracting

565-0-01 Followup of Review II ORSE Civil Engineering Procedures, 354th Tacticalof Medical Appointment Squadron, Nellis AFB, NV Fighter Wing, Myrtle BeachProcedures, 554th Operations (1/26/90) AFB, SC (1/30/90)

C-32

570-0-06 South Carolina 4803), Management of Excess 575-0-12 Management ofResidential Electricity Sales Equipment, 363d Tactical Repair Cycle Assets, 363dTax, 354th Tactical Fighter Fighter Wing, Shaw AFB, SC Tactical Fighter Wing, ShawWing, Myrtle Beach APB, SC (10/16/89) AFB, SC (1/17/90)(1/31/90)

575-0-03 Review of Quality 575-0-13 Management of570-0-07 Accountability of Assurance Over Selected Base Temporary Duty SpecialGovernment Furnished Level Service Contracts, 363d Authorizations, I IQ 9th ikirProperty Provided to the Tactical Fighter Wing, Shaw Force, Shaw APB, SC (1/24/90)Military Family I lousing AFB, SC (10/27/89)Maintenance Contractor, 4th 575-0-14 I land ToolTactical Fighter Wing, 575-0-04 Physical Security Management, 363d TacticalSeymour Johnson AFB, SC and Accountability for Small Fighter Wing, Shaw APB, SC(2/23/90) Arms, 363d Tactical Fighter (1/25/90)

Wing, Shaw AFB, SC (Project570-0-08 Review of )ual 9205216) (11/14/89) 575-0-15 Managementof CivilWeapon System War Engineering Materials, 363dReadiness Spares Kits, 4th 575-0-05 Management of the Tactical Fighter Wing, ShawTactical Fighter Wing, Report of Survey Program, APB, SC (2/05/90)Seymour Johnson AFB, NC 363d Tactical Fighter Wing,(2/27/90) Shaw AFB, SC (11/22/89) 575-0-16 Management of

Civilian Pay, 363d Tactical570-0-09 Review of 575-0-06 Effectiveness of Fighter Wing, Shaw AFB, SCAppropriated Fund Support Unannounced Cash Verif- (3/02/90)Provided Nonappropriated ication Procedures, 363dFund Activities, 354th Tactical Tactical Fighter Wing, Shaw 575-0-17 Followup, Review ofFighter Wing, Myrtle Beach AFB, SC (11/22/89) Environmental PollutionAFB, SC (2/28/90) Prevention, Control, and

575-0-07 Management of Abatement, 363d Tactical570-0-10 Review of F-15E Grand Bay Weapons Range, Fighter Wing, Shaw AFB, SCConversion Construction 347th ''actical Fighter Wing, (Project 0175214) (3/07/90)Contracts, 4th Tactical Fighter Moody AFB, GA (12/01/89)Wing, Seymour Johnson AFB, 575-0-18 Management ofNC (3/09/90) 575-0-08 Management of Contract Quarters, 347th

Incentive Pays, 363d Tactical Tactical Fighter Wing, Moody570-0-11 Review of Prior Fighter Wing, Shaw AFB, SC APB, GA (3/12/90)Years Nonappropriated Fund (12/08/89)Expenditures, 354th Tactical 575-0-19 Management ofFighter Wing, Myrtle Beach 575-0-09 Managementof Military Family ilousingAFB, SC (3/14/90) Commissary Operations, Assignments, Shaw AIP1B, SC

347th'lactical Fighter Wing, (3/6/90)570-0-12 Review of Southwest Moody AF, GA (12/12/89)Asia Prepositioned Asset 600-0-01 Management ofManagement, 4th Tactical 575-0-10 Management of Civilian Personnel PayFighter Wing, Seymour Individual Equipment Items, Allowances, 66th ElectronicJohnson AFB, NC (3/15/90) 169 Tactical Fighter Group, Combat Wing, Sembach AB,

McEntire ANG. ,-astnver, SC Germany (1011 2189)570-0-13 Management of the (1/12/90)Air PassengerTerminal, 4th 600-0-02 Accounting andTactical Fighter Wing, 575-0-11 Managementof Finance Office, CashSeymour Johnson APB, NC Temporary Duty Special Accountability and Internal(3/19/90) Authorizations, 363d Tactical Controls, I I Q TUSLOG,

Fighter Wing, Shaw APB, SC Ankara AS, Turkey (Project575-0-02 Base Supply (FB (1/16/90) 9265312) (10/17/89)

C-33

600-0-03 Followupof 600-0-12 Management of Air AS, Italy (1/10/90)Management of Force Special Morale andNoncommissioned Officers Welfare (SM&W) and 600-0-21 Accounting for theOpen Mess Operations, 377th Contingency Funds, IIQ 401st Tactical Fighter WingCombat Support Wing, USAFE, Ramstein AB, Relocation Fund, 316th AirRamstein AB, Germany Germany (12/04/89) Division, Ramstein All,(11/06/89) Germany (1/1 0/90)

600-0-13 Contract Change in600-0-04 Renovation Costs for Scope I)eterminations, IIQ 600-0-22 Management of LandGeneral Officers I lousing, USAFE, Ramstein AB, Mobile Radios, 487th TacticalRamstein All, Germany Germany (12/05/89) Missile Wing, Coiniso AS, Italy(11/09/89) (1/12/90)

600-0-14 Followup ofC-23600-0-05 Management of llost Aircraft Maintenance 600-0-23 Management ofNation Support - Creek Sweep Management, 26th Tactical Unaccompanied NCO andCredits, IIQ USAFE, Ramstein Reconnaissance Wing, Officers Quarters, 377th Com-AB, Germany (11/14/89) Zweibrucken AB, Germany bat Support Wing, Ramstein

(12/06/89) All, Germany (1/19/90)600-0-0 Management ofPersonnel Pay Allowances, 600-0-15 Civil Engineering, 600-0-24 Review of the377th Combat Support Wing, Management of Leased Software Testing and ReleaseRamstein AB, Germany Facilities, 7275th Air Base process at the Standard Sys-(11/08/89) Group, San Vito Dei Normanni tems Center, 316th Air Divi-

AS, Italy (12/11/89) sion Ramstein All, Germany600-0-07 Weapons Safety (Project 9195423) (1i26/90)Division, Program and Funds 600-0-16 FollowupofManagement, HQ USAFE, Computer Hardware 600-0-25 Management of theRamstein AB, Germany Acquisition and Maintenance Ground Launched Cruise Mis-(11/14/89) Management, 487th Tactical sile l)rawdown, 487th Tactical

Missile Wing, Comiso AS, Italy Missile Wing, Comiso AS, Italy600-0-08 Accounting and (12/12/89) (Project 9036317) (2/01/90)Finance Office, Deposits inTransit, 39th Tactical Group, 600-0-1 Accounting and 600-0-26 Management of theIncirlik Al1, Turkey Finance, Cash Accountability 401st Tactical Fighter Wing(11/17/89) and Internal Controls, 7275th Relocation Fund, IIQ USAFE,

Air San Vito I)ei Normanni Ramstein AB, Germany600-0-09 Civil Engineering AS, Italy (Project 9265312) (1/26/90)Material Management (12/15/89)Contract Operations, 39th 600-0-2. Fo;lowup of RangeTactical Group, Incirlik AB 600-0-18 Base Supply (FI Usage and Operations, 316thTurkey (11/22/89) 554 1), Followup of Manage- Air Division, Ramstein All,

ment of Organizational Equip- Germany (1/29/90)600-0-10 Civil Engineering-- ment, 487th Tactical MissileManagement of Facility Wing, Comiso AS, Italy 600-0-28 Management ofProjects, 7275 Air Base Group (12/20/89) Warehouse Storage Space(ABG), San Vito AS, Italy Utilization, 377th Combat(REVISEI) ( 1/29/89) 600-0-19 Security Police, Man- Support Wing, Ramst:in All,

agement of the Air Base Germany (1/30/90)600-0-11 Transportation of Ground Defense Program, SanWar Reserve Materiel Vito AS, Italy (12/27/89) 600-0-29 Transportation,Subsistence to Remote Management of Leased MotorLocations, 17th Air Force, 600-0-20 Management of Vehicles, 487th 'I'acticalSembach All, Germany Leased Facilities, 487th Missile Wing, Comiso AS, Italy(11/30/89) Tactical Missile Wing, Comiso (2/02/90)

C-34

600-0-30 Accounting and USAF Contingency Hospital, 602-0-12 Accounting andFinance, Management of RAP Upwood, United Kingdom Finance Office, Travel PayAdvance Travel Payments, (12/01/89) Management, 10th Tactical487th Tactical Missile Wing, Fighter Wing, RAP Alconbury,Comiso AS, Italy (2/12/90) 602-0-04 Management of United Kingdom (2/27/90)

Compressed Gases and Gas600-0-31 Management of Basic Cylinders, 10th TFW, RAP 602-0-13 ManagementofAllowance for Quarters Alconbury, United Kingdom Repair Cycle Assets at theEntitlements, 66 Electronic (12/01/89) Forward Operating Location

Combat Wing, Sembach AB, (FOL), Alhorn AB, GermanyGermany (2/20/90) 602-0-05 Base Civil (3/05/90)

Engineering, Financial600-0-32 Followup of Management for Property 602-0-14 Management ofAccounting and Finance, Office Services Agency Work, 10th Communication Securityof Defense Cost, IIQ USAFE, TFW, RAP Alconbury, United Material, 2166th Communica-Ramstein AB, Germany Kingdom (11/30/89) tions Squadron, RAF(2/27/90) Alconbury, United Kingdom

602-0-06 Military Pay-Basic (Project 0205215) (3/12/90)600-0-33 Management of Basic Allowance for Subsistence,Allowance for Quarters, 26th 17th Reconnaissance Wing, 602-0-15 BaseTactical Reconnaissance Wing, RAF Alconbury, United Communications -Zweibrucken AB, Germany Kingdom (12/05/89) Management of Land Mobile(2/27/90) Radios, 10th Tactical Fighter

602-0-07 Military Pay-Basic Wing, RAF Alconbury, United600-0-34 Management of Allowance for Subsistence, Kingdom (3/15/90)Contracting Operations, 487th 10th TFW, RAF Alconbury,Tactical Missile Wing, Comiso United Kingdom (12/05/89) 603-0-01 ManagementofAS, Italy (3/07/90) Repair Cycle Assets, 81st

602-0-08 Followup on Tactical Fighter Wing, RAF600-0-35 Management of Management of Support Equip- Bentwaters, United KingdomRamstein Recreation Center ment for the A- 10 Aircraft (10/04/89)Facility Project, 377th Combat Weapon System, 10th TacticalSupport Wing, Ramstein All, Fighter Wing, RAF Alconbury, 603-0-02 Management ofGermany (3/14/90) United Kingdom (1/23/90) Vehicle Maintenance, 81st

Tactical Fighter Wing, RAF600-0-36 Evaluation of 602-0-09 Selected Aspects of Bentwaters, United KingdomControls Over Budget Execu- the Energy Security Program - (10/06/89)tion of the Operation and Management of EmergencyMaintenance Appropriation, Generators, 10th Tactical 603-0-03 Management of theI IQ USAFE/AC, Ramstein All, Fighter Wing, RAF Alconbury, Initial Spares Support List forGermany (Project 0255316) United Kingdom (Project the MII-53J Aircraft, 39th(3/15/90) 9205215) (2/05/90) Special Operations Wing-W,

RAF Woodbridge, United602-0-01 Wang Small 602-0-10 Air Force Planning Kingdom (12/08/89)Computer Maintenance, 10th for Tactical Munitions SupportTactical Fighter Wing (TFW), During Contingencies (U), 603-0-05 Management of theRAP Alconbury, United I 0th Tactical Fighter Wing, Initial Spares Support List forKingdom (10/03/89) RAP Alconbury, United the MI 1-53J Aircraft, 81st

Kingdom (Project 0085213) Tactical Fighter Wing, RAF602-0-02 Managementof (2/05/90) (CIASSIFIEI)) Bentwaters, U nited KingdomBilleting Operations, 10th (12/12/89)TFW, RAP Alconbury, United 602-0-11 Consolidated OpenK. ngdom (10/31/89) Mess Cash Controls, 7274th 603-0-06 Management of Base

Air Base Group, RAF Supply, Individual Equipment602-0-03 Medical War Chicksands, United Kingdom Unit(IB 5688), 32d Tactical

Readiness Materiel - 608th (2/14/90) Fighter Squadron, Soesterberg

C-35

AB, The Netherlands AB, Germany (11/24/89) A 13, Germany (Project(12/15/89) 0255316) (3/13/90)

604-0-02 Management of I and603-0-07 Base Supply (FP Mobile Radios, 36th TFW, 604-0-10 Base Supply - Bench5688), Fuels Management, Bitburg AB, Germany Stock Support, 52d TFW,32nd Tactical Fighter Group, (12/01/89) Sangdahlem AB, GermanySoesterberg AB, The (3/19/90)Netherlar.ds (12/20/89) 604-0-03 Followup,

Management of Aviation Fuel 604-0-11 Transfer of603-0.08 Civil Engineering, Peacetime Requirements and Responsibilities - Pruem AS,Financial Managen.znt of Inventories, 52d TFW, 36th TFW, Bitburg AB,Property Services Agency Spangdahlem AB, Germany Germany (3/19/90)(PSA), 81 st ''FW, RA F (Project 0126120) (1/03/90)Bentwaters, United Kingdom 604-0-12 Management of(REVISED) (12/22/89) 604-0-04 Management of Audiovisual Equipment, I)et 4,

Dependent Care 1367th Audiovisual Squadron,603-0-09 Management of Responsibilities Program, Torrejon ABi, Spain (3/19/90)Special Purpose Recoverables 2139th CommunicationsAuthorized Maintenance for Squadron, Bitburg AlI, 605-0-01 l)rawdown Planning-the A-1 0 Weapon System, 81st Germany (Project 9165517) Operating Location E', I)et. 1,TFW, RAF Bentwaters, United (1/05/90) 1367th Audiovisual Sq ,adron,Kingdom (2/16/90) RAF Greenham Common,

604-0-05 Air Force Planning United Kingdom (10/02/89)603-0-10 Base Supply (FE for Tactical Munitions Support5644), Management of Rental During Contingencies, 36th 605-0-02 Drawdown Planning-Equipment, 81st TFW, RAF TFW, Bitburg AB, Germany Tenants, 501st Tactical MissileBentwaters, United Kingdom (Project 0085213) (1/10/90) Wing, RAFGreenham(2/20/90) Common, Un: .ed Kingdom

604-0-06 Review of Software (11/14/89)603-0-11 Evaluation of Testing at the StandardControls Over Budget Systems Center, 36th 'PFW, 605-0-03 Drawdown Planning,Execution of the Operation and Bitburg AB, Germany (Project Detachment 26, 28th AirMaintenance Appropriation, 9195423) (1/10/90) Weather Service (AWS), RAF81st TFW, RAF Bentwaters, Greenham Common, UnitedUnited Kingdom (Project 604-0-07 Management of Kingdom (11/17/89)0255316) (2/28/90) Dependent Care

Responsibilities Program, 36th 605-0-04 1)rawdown Planning603-0-12 Management of Life Tactical Fighter Wing, Bitburg for Commissary Troop Support,Support Equipment, 81st TFW, AB, Germany (Project RAF Greenham Common,RAF Bentwaters, United 9165517) (1/12/90) United Kingdom (11/29/89)Kingdom (3/06/90)

604-0-08 Management and 605-0-05 Management of603-0-13 Air Force Planning Control of Ilydrazine Fuel Ground Launched Cruisefor Tactical Munitions During Products, 52d Tactical Fighter Missile l)rawdown, 501stContingencies (U), RAF Wing, Spangdahlem AB, Tactical Missile Wing, RAFBentwaters United Kingdom Germany (2/13/90) Greenham, United Kingdom(Project 0085213) (3/16/90) (Project 9036317) (2/22/90)

CLSI A 1.#) 604-0-09 Evuiuation ofControls Over Budget 605-0-06 Wing l)rawdown

604-0-01 Management of Local Execution of the Operations Program, 501st TacticalPurchase Equipment (FE and Maintenance (O&M) Missile Wing, RAF Greenham5621), 52nd Tactical Fighter Appropriation (5793400), 36 Common, United KingdomWing, Spangdahlem TFW, Bitburg (3/09/90)

C-36

606-0-01 Maintenance(' 610-0-03 Vehicle Maintenance Maintenance Equipment,Family I lousing, 50th TFW, Manpower, Detachment 9, 401 st Tactical Fighter Wing,Hahn AB, Germany 7200th Management Torrejon AB, Spain (1/12/90)(REVISED) (10/18/89) Engineering Squadron, RAF

Mildenhall,United Kingdom 614-0-07 Accounting and606-0-02 Management of (1/25/90) Finance (Al)SN 6776),Vehicle Maintenance Materiel Management of CommercialControl, 435th Tactical Airlift 610-0-04 Management of Test, Services, 401st TacticalWing, Rhein-Main AB, Measurement, and Diagnostic Fighter Wing, Torrejon AB3,Germany (11/13/89) Equipment Requiring Calibra- Spain (1/17/90)

tion, 513 Airborne Command

606-0-03 Management of and Control Wing, RAF 614-0-08 Review of CivilianGround Launched Cruise Mildenhall, United Kingdom Personnel Management, 401stMissile I)rawdown, 38th (2/15/90) Tactical Fighter Wing,Tactical Missile Wing, Torrejon AB, Spain (2/01/90)Wueschheim AS, Germany 610-0-05 Managementof(Project 9036317) (11/30/89) Vehicle Maintenance, 513 614-0-09 Management of

Airborne Command and Con- Selected Local National Pay

606-0-04 Management of trol Wing, RAF Mildenhall, Procedures, 7206th Air BaseBilleting Operations, 435th United Kingdom (3/20/90) Group, Ilellenikon AB, GreeceTactical Airlift Wing, Rhein- (2/02/90)Main AB, Germany (12/20/89) 614-0-01 Civil Engineering

Materiel Management, Coin- 614-0-10 Accounting and

606-0-05 Management of bat Support Group, 401st Finance (A1)SN 5960), CashVehicle Tires and Batteries, TFW, Torrejon AB, Spain Accountability and Internal50th TFW, Hlahn AB, Germany (10/02/89) Controls, 7276th Air Base(1/31/90) Group, Iraklion AS, Greece

614-0-02 Management of (3/07/90)606-0-06 Civil Engineering Civilian Pay Entitlements forProject Management, 435th U.S. Employees, 401st TFW, 614-0-11 Management ofTactical Airlift Wing, Rhein- Torrejon AB, Spain (10/03/89) Dependent CareMain AB, Germany (2/22/90) Responsibilities Program,

614-0-03 Logistics Plans and 401 st Tactical Fighter Wing,606-0-07 Air Force Planning Programs Management, Torrejon AB, Spain (Projectfor Tactical Munitions Support Resource Plans Division, 401st 9165117) (3/13/90)During Contingencies, 50th 'rFW, Torrejon AB, SpainTFW, I lahn AB Germany (11/30/89) 614-0-12 Management of

(Project 0085213) (3/09/90) Audiovisual Equipment,614-0-04 Accounting and )etachment 4, 1367th

606-0-08 Managfmentof Finance (A I)SN 6593), Audiovisual Squadron,Aerospace Ground Equipment, Unannounced Cash Torrejon AB, Spain (3/19/90)50th TFW, Hahn AB, Germany Accountability Verifications,(3/12/90) 7206th Air Base Group, 614-0-13 Air Force Planning

Hlellenikon AB, Greece for Tactical Munitions Support610-0-01 Management of the (12/04/89) During Contingencies, 406Precision Measurement Equip- TFW, Zaragoza AB, Spain

ment Laboratory, 48th TFW, 614-0-05 Management of (Project 0085213) (3/20/90)RAF Lakenheath, United Aircraft Engine TimeKingdom (11/27/89) Compliance Technical Orders, 616-0-01 Base Supply

401stTFW, Torrejon AB, Spain Management of Local

610-0-02 Management of (12/15/89) Purchase, 20th TacticalVehicle Maintenance, 48th Fighter Wing, RAF UpperTFW, RAP Lakenheath, 614-0-06 Accountability Over fleyford, United KingdomUnited Kingdom (1/10/90) Civil Engineering Grounds (11/06/89)

C-37

616-0-02 Selected Aspects of 705-0-06 Military Family 710-0-06 Education Services-the Energy Security Program, Housing Interior Maintenance Management of'tuitionManagement of Emergency Contract, 317th Tactical Airlift Assistance Program, 314thGenerators, 20th TFW, RAF Wing, Pope APB, NC (1/05/90) Tactical Airlift Wing, LittleUpper I leyford, United Rock APB, Alt (1/16/90)Kingdom (Project 9205215) 705-0-07 Air Freight Terminal(12/18/89) Vehicle Allowances, 437th 710-0-07 Selected Aspects of

APS, Charleston AFB, SC the Energy Security Program,616-0-03 Accounting and (Project 0226110) (1/10/90) Management of EmergencyFinance Office, Management of Generators, 314th ''acticalTravel Vouchers, 20th TFW, 705-0-08 Review of Morale, Airlift Wing, Little Rock AFB,RAF Upper Heyford, United Welfare, and Recreation All (Project 9205215) (1/16/90)Kingdom (1/08/90) Operations, 437th Military

Airlift Wing, Charleston AFB, 710-0-08 Physical Security616-0-04 Followupon SC (Project 9285112) (2/26/90) and Accountability for SmallManagement of the Chemical Arms, 314th Tactical AirliftWarfare Defense Program, 707-0-01 Management of the Wing, Little Rock APB, AR20th TPW, RAF Upper Local Purchase Program, 436 (Project 9205216) (1/18/90)I leyford, United Kingdom Military Airlift Wing (MAW),(1/08/90) Dover APB, DE (1/11/90) 710-0-09 Implementation and

Management Procedures for616-0-05 Evaluation of 707-0-02 Air Freight Terminal In-I louse CommercialRedistribution of Excess War Vehicle Allowances, 436 Activities, 314th TacticalReserve Material, RAF Military Airlift Wing (MAW), Airlift Wing, Little Rock AFB,Fairchild, United Kingdom Dover AFB, DE (Project Al (Project 9305111) (1/18/90)(3/13/9) 0226110) (2/12/90)

710-0-10 Followup of Review705-0-01 Travel Voucher 710-0-01 Commissary Controls of Air National Guard (ANG)Corn putations, 437th Military Over Cash, Coupons, Checks, Acquisition Procedures andAirlift Wing (MAW), and Negotiable Instruments, Practices, 118th Tactical Air-Charleston APB, SC (10/18/89) Little Rock AFB, AR (11/07/89) lift Wing, Nashville Metro-

politan Airport, Nashville, TN705-0-02 Management of 710-0-02 Management of the (Project 6076512) (1/29/90)Interfund Reports of I)iscrep- Contractor-Operated Partsancy, 437th MAW, Charleston Store (COPARS) Contract, 710-0-11 Management ofAFB, SC (10/25/89) 314th Tactical Airlift Wing, Time Compliance Technical

Little Rock AFB, AR (11/16/89) Orders, 314th Tactical Airlift705-0-03 Military Family Wing, Little Rock APB, ARI lousing Government Owned 710-0-03 Management of the (2/13/90)Appliance Management, 437th T-56 Engine MaintenanceCES, Charleston AFB, SC Program, 314th Tactical Airift 710-0-12 Managementof(11/30/89) Wing, Little Rock AFB, All Civilian Pay, 189th Tactical

(Project 9106214) (11/16/89) Airlift Group (ANG), Little705-0-04 Followup on Aviation Rock APB, ARI (2/27/90)Fuel Peacetime Stockage 710-0-04 Food Services - MealObjective, 437th Military Access Controls, 314th Tactical 710-0-13 EquipmentAirlift Wing, Charleston AFB, Airlift Wing, Little Rock AFB, Management and Control,SC (12/14/89) A I ( 11/21,89) 223rd Combat

Communications Squadron705-0-05 Land Mobile Radio 710-0-05 Food Services - (ANG), Hot Spring, All (3/0/90)Management, 437th Military Equipment Management,Airlift Wing, Charleston APB, 314th 'actical Airlift Wing, 715-0-01 Management of BaseSC (12/20/89) Little Rock AFB, Al (11/20/89) Supply Excess Assets, 62nd

C-38

Military Airlift Wing, Military Airlift Wing, Military Airlift Wing, Norton

McChord AFB, WA (10/02/89) McChord AFB, WA (Project AFB, CA (11/09/89)0175214) (3/20/90)

715-0-02 Management of 725-0-05 Followup of Morale,

Transient Aircraft Mainte- 720-0-01 Evaluation of Official Welfare, and Recreation

nance Reimbursements, 62d Travel Management, 438th (MWR) Participation in the

Military Airlift Wing, Military Airlift Wing (MAW), Resource Recovery Recycling

McChord AFB, WA (10/25/89) McGuire AFB, NJ (Project Program (RRRP), 63d Military

9265311) (10/02/89) Airlift Wing, Norton AFB, CA

715-0-03 Management of (11/14/89)

Confidential Investigative 720-0-02 Security Planning for

Contingency Funds--FY 1989, the Military Airlift Command 725-0-06 Management of Air

AFOSI District 20, McChord Passenger Automated Check- Freight l erminal Vehicle

AFB, WA (Project 0205211) In System (PACS), 438th Allowances, 63d Military

(12/08/89) Military Airlift Wing (MAW), Airlift Wing, Norton AFB CA

McGuire AFB, NJ (Project (Project 0226110) (12/22/89)

715-0-04 Managementof 9226118) (11/01/89)Small Arms Accountability 725-0-07 Civil Engineering

and Physical Security, 62d 720-0-03 Management of Self-Ilelp Program

Military Airlift Wing, Civilian Employee Paid Management, 22d Air

McChord AFB, WA (Project Overtime, 438th Military Refueling Wing, March AFB,

9205216) (12/12/89) Airlift Wing, McGuire AFB, CA (1/11/90)NJ (1/16/90)

715-0-05 Management of the 725-0-08 Followup of

Dependent Care Responsi- 720-0-04 Managementof Pharmacy Operations,

bilities Program, 446th Associate Reserve rraining Management of Schedule II

Military Airlift Wing (Asso- Participation, 514th Military Drugs, 22nd Strategic

ciate) (AFRES), McChord AFB, Airlift Wing (Associate/Air Hospital, March AFB, CA

WA (Project 9165117) (1/04/90) Force Reserves), McGuire (2/23/90)AFBI, NJ (1/1 2/90)

715-0-06 Management of the 725-0-09 Fol lowup of Precision

Dependent Care 725-0-01 Precision Measurement Equipment

Responsibilities Program, 62d Measurement Equipment Laboratory (PMEL), 63d

Military Airlift Wing, Laboratory (PMEL) Military Airlift Wing, Norton

McChord AFB, WA (Project Management, 63rd Military AFB, CA (2/26/90)

9165117) (1/04/90) Airlift Wing, Norton AFB, CA(10/02/89) 725-0- 10 Base Supply (FB

715-0-07 Followup of Aviation 4664), Management of the Base

Fuel Financial Management, 725-0-02 Maragement of Service Store, 22d Air

62d Military Airlift Wing, Confidential Investigative Refueling Wing, March AFB,

McChord AFB, WA(1/10/90) Contingency Funds - FY 89, CA (2/28/90)AFOSI District 18, Norton

715-0-08 Management of the AFB, CA (Project 0205211) 730-0-01 Civil Reserve Air

Dependent Care (11/03/89) Fleet (CRAF) Crew

Responsibilities Program, Commitments, IIQ Military

Office of the Adjutant General, 725-0-03 Management of Airlift Command (MAC), Scott

Camp Murray, WA (Project Personal Property Shipments, AFB, I, (10/02/89)

9165117) (2/16/90) 63d Military Airlift Wing,Norton AFB, CA (11/03/89) 730-0-02 Management of

715-0-09 Followup, Review of Small Computer llardware and

Environmental Pollution 725-0-04 Base Supply (FB Software, 131stTactical

Prevention, Control, and A.448), Due-Out Validation Fighter Wing (TFW),

Abatement Program, 62d Process Management, 63d Bridgeton, M O (10/02/89)

C-39

730-0-03 Management of Test, Aeromedical Airlift Wing, Program (QAP), 375thMeasurement, and Diagnostic Scott AF1, I, (12/01/89) Aeromedical Airlift WingEquipment (TM DE) Section, (AAW), Scott APB, IL, (2/08/90)375th Aeromedical Airlift 730-0-11 Travel Management,Wing (AAW), Scott AFB, 1I, Communications Systems 730-0-20 Management of(10/03/89) Program Office (CSPO), Scott Vehicle Maintenance lland

AFB, 1I, (12/01/89) and Special Tools, 375th730-0-04 Management and Aeromedical Airlift WingAccountability of Drugs, 730-0-12 Contracting for (AAW), Scott APB, I1, (2/08/90)Medical Supplies, and Travel Services, 375th Aero-Equipment of the 57th medical Airlift Wing (AAW), 730-0-21 Management ofAeromedical Evacuation Scott APB, IL (Project Commissary Cash Control,Squadron, 375th Aeromedical 9076414) (12/21/89) Scott APB, IL (2/08/90)Airlift Wing (AAW), ScottAFB, IL (10/17/89) 730-0-13 Medical Equipment 730-0-22 Review of Spare F117

Repair Center (MERC) Man- Engine Requirements for C-17730-0-05 Management of agement, USAF Medical Cen- Aircraft, IIQ Military Airlift375th Base Supply Squadron ter, Scott AF3, IL (10/04/90) Command (MAC), Scott APB,(SRAN FB 4407), Allowance I, (Project 0126121) (2/12/90)and Authorization, 375th 730-0-14 Followup ofAeromedical Airlift Wing, Management of Coordination 730-0-23 Management of theScott AFB, IL (10/26/89) of Benefits (COB) Program, Golf Course, Chanute

USAF Medical Center Scott, Technical Training Center,730-0-06 Management of Local Scott AFB, IL (1/04/90) Chanute AFB, IL (2/12/90)Purchase Items, 375th BaseSupply (FB 4467), 375th 730-0-15 Management of 730-0-24 Air Force Implemen-Aeromedical Airlift Wing I Iousehold Goods Shipments, tation of the Federal Managers(AAW), Scott AFB, IL 375th Transportation Financial Intregrity Act(11/03/89) Squadron, Scott AFB, I, (FMFIA), I IQ MAC, Scott AFB,

(1/12/90) I, (Project 9265320) (3/01/90)730-0-07 Followup ofOperational Readiness of the 730-0-16 Management of Base 730-0-25 Evaluation of932d Civil Engineering Supply Material Storage and Controls Over BudgetSquadron, 932d Aeromedical Distribution, 375th Execution of the OperationsAirlift Group (AAG) Aeromedical Airlift Wing and Maintenance(Associate) (AFRES), Scott (AAW), Scott AFB, I L (1/27/90) Appropriation, HQ MAC, ScottAFB, IL (11/08/89) AFB, IL (Project 0255316)

730-0-17 Operational (3/02/90)730-0-08 Evaluation of Readiness of the 375th CivilEfficiency and Effectiveness of Engineering Squadron (CES), 730-0-26 Air ForceMaintenance Training 375th Aeromedical Airlift Implementation of the FederalManagement, 375th Wing (AAW), Scott AFB, IL Managers' Financial IntegrityAcromedical Airlift Wing, (1/19/90) Act (IPMFIA), 375 AAW, ScottScott APB, I, (11/17/89) AIPB, II, (Project 9265320)

730-0-18 Management of Air (3/02/90)730-0-09 Management of Force Official RepresentationSmall Computer Ilardware and Contingency Funds - PY 1989, 730-0-27 EquipmentSoftwla'e, Chanute Technical iiQ Air Force Communications Accountability, 1842Training Center (CTTC), Command (AFCC), Scott AFB, Electronics Engineering GroupChanute AF, II (11/28/89) I, (Project 0205212) (2/01/90) (EEG), Scott APB, I, (3/08/90)

730-0-10 Management of Land 730-0-19 Accounting and 730-0-28 Review ofMobile Radios, 375th Finance Quality Assurance Management of

C-40

Noncommissioned Officer's Onizuka AFB, CA (12/06/89) 805-0-06 Physical Security

Club, 375 AAW, Scott AFB, IL and Accountability for Small

(3/14/90) 735-0-08 Physical Security Arms, 1961st Communications

and Accountability for Small Group, Clark AB, Republic of

730-0-29 Review of Morale, Arms, 60 Military Airlift the Philippines (1/09/90)

Welfare, and Recreation Wing, Travis AFB, CA (Project(MWR) Operations, 375 AAW, 9205216) (12/08/89) 805-0-07 Managementof

Scott AFB, IL (Project Compressed Gases and

9285112) (3/15/90) 735-0-09 General Internal Cylinders, 13th Air Force

Controls Within the Data Medical Center, Clark AB,

730-0-30 Review of Morale, Processing Center, 1901 Republic of the Philippines

Welfare, and Recreation Communications Group,

Operations, Chanute AFB, IL Travis AFB, CA (1/19/90) 805-0-08 Physical Security

(Project 9285112) (3/20/90) and Accountability for Small

735-0-10 Civil Engineering-- Arms, 3d TFW, Clark AB,

735-0-01 Land Mobile Radio Management of the Republic of the Philippines

Requirements, 60th Military Government Operated Civil (Project 9205216) (1/11/90)

Airlift Wing, Travis AFB, CA Engineering Supply Store,

(10/02/89) Military Airlift Wing, Travis 805-0-09 Air Force Planning

AFB, CA (1/30/90) for Tactical Munitions Support

735-0-02 Air Force During Contingencies, 3d

Implementation of the Federal 805-0-01 Accounting and TFW, Clark AB, Republic of

Manager's Financial Integrity Finance, Cash Accountabiity the Philippines (Project

Act - 1989,60th Military and Internal Controls, 3rd 0085213) (1/19/90)

Airlift Wing, Travis AFB, CA TFW, Clark AB, Republic of

(Project 9265320) (10/23/89) the Philippines (Project 805-0-10 Base Supply9265312) (10/02/89) Management of Standard Form

735-0-03 Management of 44 Local Purchase Program, 3d

Confidential Investigative 805-0-02 Review of Civilian TFW, Clark AB, Republic of

Contingency Funds--FY 1989, Pay - Foreign Post Differential, the Philippines (2/20/90)

AFOSI District 19, Travis 3rd TFW, Clark AB, Republic

AF11, CA (Project 0205211) of the Philippines (10/02/89) 805-0-11 Management of the

(10/27/89) Composite Tool Kit Program,

805-0-03 Security Planning for 3dTFW, Clark All, Republic of

735-0-04 Supply - Due-Out the Military Airlift Command's the Philippines (3/02/90)

Management, 60th Military Passenger Automated Check-

Airlift Wing, Travis AFB, CA In System, 624th Military 805-0-12 Followup of

(11/06/89) Airlift Support Group, Clark Management of Aviation Fuel

All, Republic of the Philippines Peacetime Requirements and

735-0-05 Maintenance - C-141 (Project 9226118) (10/02/89) Inventories, 3d Tactical

Oxygen Walk-Around Bottles, Fighter Wing, Clark AB,

60th Military Airlift Wing, 805-0-04 Commissary Meat Republic of the Philippines

Travis AFB, CA (11/20/89) Department Operations, (Project 0126120) (3/02/90)

Detachment 53, AFCOMS/

735-0-06 Morale, Welfare, and FCS, Clark AlB, Republic ofthe 805-0-13 Management of the

Recreation (MWR), Accounting Philippines(10/31/89) Dependent Care

Support for Onizuka AF1, 60th Responsibilities Program, 3d

Military Airlift Wing, Travis 805-0-05 Selected Aspects of Tactical Fighter Wing, Clark

AFB, CA (12/04/89) the Energy Security Program, AB, Republic ofthc PhilippinesManagement of Emergency (Project 9165117) (3/06/90)

735-0-07 Morale, Welfare, and Generators, 3d Tactical

Recreation (MWR), Review of Fighter Wing, Clark All, 805-0-14 Management of the

Interim Financial Statements, Republic of the Philippines Dependent Care

2nd Satellite Tracking Group, (Project 9205215) (12/13/89) Responsibilities Program, 353d

C-41

Special Operations Wing, Aircrew Training Program, 15th Supply Squadron (FBClark AB Republic of the 962nd Airborne Warning and 5260), 1l ickam AFB, IIIPhilippines (Project Control Squadron, Elmendorf (11/08/89)9165117)(3/07/90) APB, AK (1/26/90)

810-0-07 Selected Aspects of805-O-15Management of the 807-0-10 Managementofthe the Energy Security Program,Dependent Care Responsi- Aircrew Training Program, Management of Emergencybil1t ies Program, 13th Air 616th Military Airlift Group, Generators, IIQ PACAF,Force, Clark AB, Republic of EImendorf API, AK (1/26/90) 1lickam APB, II1 (Projectthe Philippines (Prqject 9205215) (11/30/89)9165117) (3/15/90) 807-0-11 Management of

Cannibalization Actions, 343rd 810-0-08 Management of807-0-01 Management of Tactical Fighter Wing, Eielson Schedule 11 Controlled Drugs,Hazardous Materiai., USAF AFB, AK (2/12/90) 15th Air Base Wing, HickamRegional I lospital, Elmendorf AFB, II1 (11/30/89)A PB, A K (10/02/89) 807-0-12 Review of Selected

Management Procedures, Test, 810-0-09 Management of807-0-02 Managementof Measurement, and Diagnostic Aerospace Ground Equipment,Pharmacy Operations, USAF Equipment Branch, 21st 154th Composite Group,Regional I lospital, Elmendorf Tactical Fighter Wing, Hawaii Air National Guard,AP, AK (10/05/89) Elmendorf APB, AK (2/15/90) Ilickam AFB, III

(12/11/89)807-0-03 Review of Base- Level 810-0-01 Pollowup of

Planning for 2nd Year Person. Environment, Ilealth, and 810-0-10 Audit Pollowup--nel Concept III Implementa- Safety Standards at Remote Management oftion Sites, 21 st TFW, Sites, 15th Air Base Wing, Communication SecurityElmendorf AFB, AK (Project Hickam AFB, 111 (10/17/89) (COMSEC) Material, Combat9195422) (11/14/89) Communications Group,

810-0-02 Review of ilawaii Air National Guard,807-0-04 Management of the Transportable Shelter System Ilickam AF, HI (ProjectSelf-Ilelp Program, 21st (TSS), IIQ PACAP, Ilickam 0205215) (1/10/90)Tactical Fighter Wing, APB, III (Project 9195420)Elmendorf AFB, AK ( 1/14/89) (10/30/89) 810-0-11 Audit Followup--

Management of807-0-05 Management of the 810-0-03 Followup of Communication SecuritySelf-I lelp Program, 343rd Maintenance Alternatives for (COMSEC) Material,TFW, Eielsen AFB, AK the Engineering and Services Communications Group,(11/14/89, Management Information Hickam AFB, I11 (Project

System, IIQ PACAF, ilickam 0205215) (1/16/90)807-0-06 Walk Through Local AF, III (11/03/89)Purchases, 21st TFW, 810-0-12 Audit Foliowup--Elmendorf AFB, AK (11/14/89) 810-0-04 Management of Managementof

Aerospace Ground Equipment, Communication Security807-0-07 Managementof 619th Military Airlift Support (COMSEC) Material, IIQIlazardous Materials, 21st Squadron, flickam AFB, III Pacific CommunicationsTactical Fighter Wing, (11/03/89) Division, II ickam , PB, IllElmendorf AFB, A K (11/14/89) (Project 0205215) (2/05/90)

ogui0-0, ;Maaiageznnt of807-0-08 Management of Mobility Bags, 15th Air Base 810-0-13 Air Force PlanningHazardous Materials, 343rd Wing, Ilickam APB, III for Tactical Munitions SupportTactical Fighter Wing, Eielson (11/08/89) During Contingencies, I IQAFB, AK (1/12/90) PACAF, Ilickam APB, Ili

810-0-06 Management of (Project 0085213)807-0-09 Management of the Aerospace Ground Equipment, (2/12/90)

C-42

815-0-01 Base Repair Equipment Unit, 18th Supply Japan (Project 0085213)

Capability, 313th Air Division, Squadron (FB 5270).. Kadena (3/05/90)

Kadena AB, Japan ( 0/04/89) AB, Japan (1/22/90)815-0-20 Billeting Operations,

815-,-02 Managementof 815-0-11 Medical 633d Air Base Wing, Andersen

Aerospace Ground Equipment, Reimbursements and AFB, Guam (3/08/90)

43rd Bombardment Wing, Collections, 313th MedicalAndersen AFB, Guam Group, Kadena AB, Japan 815-0-21 SR-71 Deactivation,

(10/12/89) (1/22/90) Detachment 1, 9th StrategicReconnaissance Wing, Kadena

815-0-03 Furniture 815-0-12 Evaluation of AB, Japan (3/08/90)

Management, 475th Air Base Physical Security andWing, Yokota AB, Japan Accountability for Small Arms, 815-0-22 Management of

(10/13/89) Kadena AR, Japan (Project Aerospace Ground Equipment,9205216) (1/30/90) 376th Strategic Wing (376

815-0-04 Management of SW), Kadena AB, Japan

Pararescue Unit, Operating 815-0-13 Management of (3/16/90)

Location (O1,)-A, Det 1, 1730 Mobility Bags, 313th AirPararescue Squadron, Kadena Division, Kadena AR, Japan 815-0-23 Review of Morale,

AB, Japan (10/27/89) (2/06/90) Welfare, and Recreation(MWR) Operations, Yokota

815-0-05 Management of 815-0-14 Billeting Operations, AR, Japan (Project 9285112)

Confidential Investigative 313th Air Division, Kadena (3/16/90)

Contingency Funds, AFOSI Al, Japan (2/08/90)District 46, Yckota AB, Japan 815-0-24 Management of

(Project 0205211) 815-0-15 Management of Aircraft War Readiness Spares

(11/03/89) Compressed Gases and Kits, 475th Air Base Wing (475

Cylinders, 633d Air Base ABW), Yokota Al, Japan

815-0-06 Management of Wing, Andersen AFB, Guam (3/19/90)

Compressed Gases and (2/12/90)Cylinders, 313th Air Division, 820-0-01 Managementof

Kadena AR, Japan (11/08/89) 815-0-16 Selected Aspects of Flight Simulator Training,Military Family I lousing 432nd Tactical Fighter Wing,

815-0-07 Civil Engineering Management, 475th Air Base Misawa AB, Japan (10/31/89)

Ground Generator Wing, Yokota Al1, Japan

Management, 633d Civil (2/12/90) 820-0-02 Management of the

Engineering Individual Equipment Unit,

Squadron,Andersen AFB, 815-0-17 Management of 432d Tactical Fighter Wing

Guam (12/15/89) Airframe Time Compliance Supply Squadron (FB 5205),Technical Order ('T'C''O) Kits, Misawa AB, Japan (11/01/89)

815-0-08 Civil Engineering 18th Tactical Fighter Wing (18

Ground Generator TFW), Kadena All, Japan 820-0-03 Management of

Management, 313th Air (Project 0106217) (2/28/90) Repair Cycle Asset Processing,

Division, Kadena All, Japan 432d Tactical Fighter Wing,

(12/15/89) 815-0-18 Management of F-15 Misawa AB, Japan (11/02/89)Aircraft Awaiting Parts

815-0-09 Financial Discrepancies, 18th Tactical 820-0-04 Selected Aspects of

Management of Class "B" Fighter Wing (18 TFW), Medical Logisties, 432d

Telephone Service, 313th Air Kadena All, Japan (2/28/90) Medical Group, Misawa All,

Division, Kadena Al, Japan Japan ( 1/07/89)

(12/22/89) 815-0-19 Air Force Planningfor Tactical Munitions Support 820-0-05 Followup of

815-0-10 Followup of during Contingencies, 313th Management of Military

Management of the Individual Air Division, Kadena All, Airlift Command (MAC)

C-43

Funds, Misawa AR, Japan Hazardous Material and Korea (1/12/90)(12/11/89) Waste, 8th Tactical Fighter

Wing, Kunsan AlI, Korea 825-0-11 Managementof820-0-06 Followup of (10/11/89) Morale, Welfare, andManagement of F- 16 Recreation (MWR) Activities,Ilydrazine Fuel, 432 Tactical 825-0-03 Management of 51stTactical Fighter Wing,Fighter Wing, Misawa AR, Vehicle Maintenance, 8th Osan AB, Korea (ProjectJapan (1/02/90) Tactical Fighter Wing, Kunsan 9285112) (1/12/90)

AB, Korea (10/11/89)820-0-07 Management of 825-0-12 Followup,Vehicle Operations, 432d 825-0-04 Management of Management of AccountingTactical Fighter Wing, Misawa Temporary Duty (TY)Travel and Finance Materiel, 8thAli, Japan (1/02/90) Funds, 554th Red I lorse Civil Tactical Fighter Wing, Kunsan

Engineering Squadron, Osan AB, Korea (1/16/90)820-0-98 Management of the AR, Korea (11/22/89)Dependent Care Responsi- 825-0-13 Surveillance Overbilities Program, 432d ''actical 825-0-05 Management of Government FurnishedFighter Wing, Misawa AB, Medical Supplies and Property, Detachment 28, AirJapan (Project 9165117) Equipment, 658th USAF Force Contract Maintenance(1/02/90) Contingency Ilospital, Kimhae Center, Kimhae Al, Korea

A1, Korea (11/22/89) (1/16/90)820-0-09 Management ofGround Generators, 432d 825-0-06 Management of Base 825-0-14 Air Force PlanningTactical Fighter Wing, Misawa Supply Inventory Section (FB for Tactical Munitions SupportAB, Japan (1/03/90) 5294), 51 st Tactical Fighter During Contingencies, 6171 st

Wing, Osan Al, Korea Air Base Squadron, Kwangju820-0-10 Followup of Cash (12/14/89) AB, Korea (Project 0085213)Controls in Nonappropriated (2/09/90)Fund Activities, 432d Tactical 825-0-07 Management ofFighter Wing, Misawa Al, Confidential Investigative 825-0-15 Physical SecurityJapan (1/18/90) Contingency Funds, AFOSI and Accountability for Small

District 45, Seoul, Korea Arms, 51 st Tactical Fighter820-0-11 lollowup of (Project 0205211) Wing, Osan AB, Korea (ProjectManagement of the Combat (12/22/89) 9205216) (2/09/90)Arms Training MaintenanceUnit (CATMU) Program, 432d 825-0-08 Air Force Planning 825-0-16 Management ofTactical Fighter Wing, Misawa for Tactical Munitions Support Morale, Welfare, andAl, Japan (2/06/90) During Contingencies, 8th Recreation (MWR) Activities,

Tactical Fighter Wing, Kunsan 8th Tactical Fighter Wing,820-0-12 Air Force Planning AB, Korea (Project 0085213) Kunsan All, Korea (Projectfor Tactical Munition Support (12/27/89) 9285112) (2/16/90)During Contingencies, 432dTactical Fighter Wing, Misawa 825-0-09 IFollowup-- 825-0-17 Air Force PlanningAB, Japan (Project 0085213) Management of laundry and for Tactical Munitions Support(2/07/90) Appliance Service Contracts, During Contingencies, 460th

51st Tactical Fighter Wing, Tactical Reconnaissance825-0-01 Management of Osan A1, Korea (12/29/89) Group, Taegu AB, KoreaChemicai Warfare iDefense (Project 0085213)Nquipment (FB 5284), 8th 825-0-10 Management of (2/16/90)Tactical Fighter Wing, Kunsan Special Purpose RecoverablesAR, Korea (10/10/89) Authorized Maintenance 825-0-18 Red I lorse Material

(SPRAM), 5lst'i'actical Management, 554th Red Ilorse825-0-02 Management of Fighter Wing, Osan, All Civil Engineering Squadron

C-44

(RItCES), Osan AB, Korea 910-0-02 Management of 910-0-10 Review of

(2/20/90) Deferred Discrepancies, Management of theKeesler Technical Training Installation Civilian Training

825-0-19 Management of Center, Keesler AFB, MS Program, Keesler Technical

Supply Points (FB 5294), 51st (10/05/89) Training Center, Keesler AFB,

Tactical Fighter Wing, Osan MS (2/28/90)

AB, Korea (2/28/90) 910-0-03 ManagementofWRM Medical Materiel, USAF 920-0-02 Review of Aviation

825-0-20 Traffic Management Medical Center, Keesler AFB, Fuels Management, 323 FTW,

Office (TMO), Personal MS (10/05/89) Mather AFB, CA (Project

Property Shipments, 51 st 9265317) (11/03/89)Tactical Fighter Wing, Osan 910-0-04 Management of

AB, Korea (3/14/90) Deferred Discrepancies, 403rd 920-0-01 Followup of

Tactical Airlift Wing (AFRES), Management of Aerospace

905-0-01 Testing of Materiel Keesler AFB, MS(10/30/89) Ground Equipment, 323 FTW,

Transactions at Base-Level, Mather AFB, CA (10/30/89)

I Ieadquarters Standard 910-0-05 Management of Local

Systems Center (SSC), Gunter Purchase Program Air Combat 920-0-03 Management ofthe

AFB, A, (Project 8195423) Maneuvering Instrumentation Cannibalization Program for

(10/02/89) System, Mississippi Air the KC 135Qfi'-38 Weapon

National Guard Field Training System, 9th Strategic

905-0-02 Management of the Site (FTS), Gulfport, MS Reconnaissance Wing, Beale

Software Support Contract, (11/16/89) AFB, CA (11/20/89)

Standard Systems Center,Gunter A FB, AL (10/27/89) 910-0-06 Review of the 920-0-04 Managementof

Construction Air Combat Quality Assurance Program,

905-0-03 Review of Regulatory Maneuvering Instrumentation 323 FTW, Mather AI"B, CA

Guidance Used in Software System Support Facility, (11/27/89)

System Development, Mississippi Air National

Standard Systems Center, Guard Field Training Site 920-0-05 Management of the

Gunter APB, Al, (1/23/90) (TFS), Gulfport, MS (11/16/89) Installation Civilian TrainingProgram, 323 FTW, Mather

905-0-04 Evaluation of the Use 910-0-07 Management of AFB, CA (12/18/89)

of Standard Programming Noncommissioned Officers

Language3, Standard Systems Open Mess Food Service 920-0-06 Review of Facility

Center, Gunter AFB, A, Operations, Keesler Technical Project Management, 323

(3/01/90) Training Center, Keesler AFB, FTW, Mather AFB, CAMS (12/19/89) (12/29/89)

905-0-05 Followup ofManagement of Base 910-0-08 Review of the 922-0-01 USAI" Wargaming

Contracting Automated Automated Travel Record Center, Computer Operations,

System (BCAS) Development, Accounting System (ADSN Air University Center for

Standard Systems Center, 5251), Keesler Technical Aerospace Doctrine, Research,

Gunter AFB, Al, (3/15/90) Training Center, Keesler AFB, and Education (CADIRE),MS (1/23/90) Maxwell AFB, AL ( 10/ 11/89)

910-0-01 Reviewof AirCombat Maneuvering 910-0-09 Followup, 922-0-02 Followup Audit,

Instrumentation (ACMI) Management of Aviation Fuel Management oiF-41) Flying

System, Mississippi Air Peacetime Requirements and Il our Program During

National Guard, Air National Inventories, Mississippi Air Conversion to F-16 A/IB

Guard Field Training Site National Guard Field Training Aircraft, 187th TFG, )annelly

(FTS), Gulfport, MS Site (FTS), Gulfport, MS Field (ANG), Montgomery, Al,

(10/05/89) (Project 0126120) (2/21/90) (10/26/89)

C-45

922-0-03 Review of Impact of Levels, Randolph AFB, TX Randolph APB, TX (ProjectProfessional Military (11/09/89) 9325116) (1/26/90)Education Changes on BaseFunctions, Air University, 925-0-08 Use of Services 925-0-17 Review of CivilianMaxwell AF, AL (11/09/89) Information Management Emergency Medical Care,

System for Identifying Subsis- Wilford flall USAF Medical922-0-04 Management of tence-in- Kind Personnel, 12 Center, Lackland APB, TXAutomated Data Processing FTW, Randolph AFB, TX (2/05/90)Resources, I IQ USAF (11/30/89)llistorical Research Center, 925-0-18 Review of CivilianMaxwell AFB, Al, (1/10/90) 925-0-09 Management of Emergency Medical Care,

Mobility Munitions and Equip- Brooke Army Medical Center,922-0-05 Management of ment, 12 FTW, Randolph AFB, Ft Sam I louston, TX (2/07/90)I losuital Contract Services, Air TX (12/16/89)University Regional Ilospital, 925-0-19 Management ofAirAir University, Maxwell AI"B, 925-0-10 Air Force Force Official RepresentationAL (1/10/90) Implementation of the Federal Contingency Funds- FY 1989,

Managers' Financial Integrity I IQ Electronic Security925-0-01 Management of Air Act - PY 1989, AFMPC/DPMS, Command, San Antonio, TXTraining Command 'remporary Randolph AFB, TX (Project (Project 0205212) (2/07/90)Duty to School Funds, IJQ Air 9265320) (12/27/89)'Training Command, Randolph 925-0-20 Management of AirAP, TX ( 0/01/89) 925-0-11 Review of Manage- Force Official Representation

ment of the Installation Contingency Funds- Fiscal925-0-02 Management of Gas Civilian Training Program, Year 1989, IIQ Air ForceCylinders, Lackland AFB,'TX Lackland AFB, TX (1/05/90) Military Personnnel Center,(10/03/89) Randolph APB, TX (Project

925-0-12 Evaluation of the 0205212) (2/07/90)925-0-03 Injury Compensation Installation Civilian TrainingPolicy and Operation, Program, Goodfellow APB, TX 925-0-21 Abusable DrugRandolph APR, TX (10/03/89) (1/12/90) Inventory and Control, Wilford

Hall Medical Center, Lackland925-0-04 Air Force 925-0-13 Review of AFB, TX (REVISE!)) (2/08/90)Implementation of the Federal Management of theManagers' Financial Integrity Installation Civilian Training 925-0-22 Followup ofAct, HQ Air Force Commissary Program, 47 FTW, Laughlin Management of DecentralizedService, Kelly AFB TX (Project AFB,'TX (1/16/90) Blanket Purchase Agreements,9265320) (10/11/89) Wilford Ilall Medical Center,

925-0-14 Implementation of Lackland AiB,TX (3/12/90)925-0-05 Management of In-Ilouse Commercial ActivityDepot Maintenance Quality Decisions, 12th Audiovisual 930-0-01 Review of AviationAssurance Program, Randolph Services Division, 12 FTW, Fuels Management, SheppardA F, TX (Project 9106216) Randolph A FB, TX (Project APB, TX (Project 9265317)(10/19/89) 9305111) (1/17/90) (10/05/89)

925-0-06 Recovery of Advance 925-0-15 Evaluation of the 930-0-02 Review ofTravel Payments, I IQ Air Installation Civilian Training Commissary Meat )epartmentTraining Coilniand, Randolph Program, i2 FTW, Randolph Operations, etachment 20,APB, TX (10/20/89) APB, TX (1/19/90) Sheppard APB, TX (10/27/89)

925-0-07 Administrative 925-0-16 Management of 930-0-03 ManagementofControls for Adjusted Stock Pharmacy Operations, Pharmacy Operations, USAF

C-46

Regional I lospital, Sheppard Training and resting 8076418 Review of Air Force

AFB, TX (Project 9325116) Requirements (Project Contractor Logistics Support

(12/12/89) 9036316) (2/02/90) Contracts (12/29/89)

930-0-04 Review of 7275111 Base Food Service 8085226 Air Force Planning

Management of the Operations (12/28/89) for Explosive OrdnanceInstallation Training Program, Disposal (EOI)) During

Sheppard AFB, TX (12/15/89) 7275115 Medical Food Service Contingencies (3/09/90)Operations (12/19/89) (CLASSIFIED)

930-0-05 Followup ofManagement of Chemical 7285315 Management of Open 8195424 Civil Engineering

Warfare I)efense Equipment, Mess Operations (11/13/89) Material Acquisition System

Sheppard Technical Training (CEMAS) (2/06/90)Center, Sheppard AFB, TX 8016211 Review of Reliability(12/20/89) and Maintainability 8255311 Review of Air Force

Requirements in Science and Industrial Fund (AFIF)

930-0-06 Review of Air Technology Projects (10/13/89) Management Information

National Guard Training System (11/15/89)Attendance, 181st Aerial Port 8036314 Management ofTaskFlight, Texas Air National Order Contracting for 8275110 Commissary Grocery

Guard, Sheppard AFB, TX Strategic Defense Initiative Department - Ordering,

(1/03/90) Programs (12/08/89) Receiving, and Warehousing(11/03/89)

930-0-07 Air Force 8036317 F-16C/l) Multiyear IfManagement of Injury Contract Management 9036311 MC- 13011 Combat

Compensation Claims, (11/06/89) Talon II Logistics Support

Sheppard AFP, TX (Project Management (2/28/90)0155110) (2/15/C-^) 8036320 Procurement and

Provisioning Actions Within 9036321 13- B Electronic

930-0-08 Review of the Advanced Medium Range Countermeasures RecoveryEnvironmental Pollution Air-to-Air Missile (2/27/90) Plan Funding (11/09/89)Prevention, Control, andAbatement, Sheppard AFB, TX 8036324 Financial 9036323 Followup Audit--C-5

(Project 0175214) (3/07/90) Management of Selected Engine IntermediateStrategic Defense Initiative Maintenance ( 1/24/89)

930-0-09 Review of Morale, Contracts (12/08/89)Welfare, and Recreation 9036325 Followup Audit--Operations, 443d Military 8036325 Acquisition of Low Warranty Management ofAirlift Wing, Altus AFB, OK Altitude Navigation and Peacekeeper Non-Propulsion

(Project 9285112) (3/14/90) Targeting Infrared for Night Systems (3/09/90)Depot Management

CENTRALLY DIRECTEI) Information System (10/24/89) 9046412 Followup Audit--REPORTS Contracting for Reliability and

8036326 Acquisition of Maintainability in Air Force

0255311 Results of the Unified Infrared Detecting Sets for Air Logistics Command

Budget Test (Uwr) (3/15/90) Force Special Operations Modification ProgramsForces ( 1127/89) (1/18/90)

063-9-1 Ground LaunchedCruise Missile Drawdown 8036327 Managementofthe 9066411 Contractor Use of

(Project 9036317) (10/20/89) Advanced Tactical Fighter Government FurnishedTechnical Analytical Study Equipment for Commercial

063-9-2 F-4 Aircraft for Support Contract (1/19/90) Work (10/30/89)

C-47

9066413 Followup Audit-- 9195411 Review oflBase 9196613 Review of Air ForceI)ol)-Wide Audit of Contract Contracting Automated Logistics CommandAdministration of Major System (IBCAS) Solicitation Communications-ComputerConstruction Projects and Award Process Application Systems Standardization Plans(10/03/89) Controls (2/28/90) (11/20/89)

9106210 Implementation of 9195416 Management of the 9196615 Review of the DesignClass IV and V Modification Computer Systems Authori- and Development Activities ofObjectives (2/14/90) zation Directory (CSAD) the LOGAIR Realtime

(1/23/90) Terminal System9106220 Followup Audit-- (10/04/89)Review and Approval of Air 9195417 Evaluation of theForce Class IV and V Core Automated Maintenance 9196619 Review of CentralModifications (2/12/90) System (CAMS) Status and Procurement Accounting

Inventory Subsystem System Implementation9126112 Adjustments of Depot Application Controls (3/09/90) Activities (3/16/90)Purchased Equipment Main-tenance Exchangeable Repair 9195418 Practicality of 9196622 Review of FundingRequirements Consolidating Central Design Issues for the Enhanced(12/18/89) Activities (12/15/89) Trarsportation Automated

Data System (1/03/90)9126122 Requirements for the 9195419 Review of theMobile Aircraft Arresting Automated Teller Machines 9205214 Air ForceSystem (3/02/90) (ATMs) for Military Pay Management of Defense

Functions (10/30/89) Courier Service Operations9126124 Followup Audit-- (1/22/90)Provisioning Requirements 9196611 Post ImplementationComputations (3/19/90) Review of the Engineering 9215411 Review of the Air

Data Computer Assisted Force Command and Control9155110 Followup Audit-- Retrieval System (12/15/89) Systems (AFC2S) ProgramUnemployment Compensation (3/16/90)for Former Air Force Civilian 9196612 Review of SecurityEmployees (1/04/90) Procedures for Air Force 9215412 Review of'Tests

Logistics Command Major Planned for the Unified Local9175212 Review of Air Force Automated Data Processing Area Network ArchitectureAppliance Management Modernization Programs (ULANA) I Program(1/02/90) (2/28/90) (1/25/90)

Copies of audit reports may be obtained from the appropriate issuing office bycalling:

IG, DoD - (202) 694-6302Army Audit Agency - (703) 756-2883Naval Audit Service - (703) 756-2129A:. -. A.4, A^...... 174A4, 201 -77 " "*.i""z md''"t a gencies

Requests by news media and others outside the Government shouldcontact AFAAIIM (FOIA), Norton AFB, CA 92409-6001

C-48

APPENI)IX 1) 1/

Potential Monetary BenefitsINSPECTOR GENERAL, 1)oi), AUI)IT REPORTS ISSUED ($ in thousands)

CONTAINING QUANTIFIABLEPOTENTIAL MONETARY BENEFITS 2/ Disallowed Funds Put to

Costs 3/ Better Use

90-001 User Charges and Resource Management at Major Range $475and rpest Facilities

90-002 Acquisition of the M9 Armored Combat Earthmover $11,300Program

90-003 Management of Special Access Programs at the Defense $1,000Intelligence Agency (CLASSIFIE))

90-005 Requirements Validation for Telecommunications Services $117,118

90-009 Defense Logistics Agency Commercial Activities Program $61,500

90-013 Administration of Contractor Rental of DoD Plant $9Equipment at Boeing Ilelicopters

90-014 Moore's Cafeteria Services, Inc., Food Services Contract $619 $82

90-015 Quick-Reaction Report on the Audit of Defense $150Environmental Restoration Fund

90-016 Pricing of Subcontract Awarded to Aircraft Porous Media, $2,485Inc. by Northrop Corp. for Prime Contract N00019-83-C-0272

90-017 Pricing of Contract N00383-82-C-1023 at Aircraft Porous $205

Media, Inc.

90-018 Pricing of Indefinite Delivery Contract N00019-84-D-0176 $282

90-021 Acquisition of the Ileavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck $3,000

90-022 Pricing of Subcontract Awarded to Aircraft Porous Media, $186Inc. by Boeing Vertol Co. for Prime Contract N00019-83-C-031 l

90-023 Pricing of Contract N00383-82-C- 1017 at Aircraft Porous $433Media, Inc.

90-024 Pricing of Subcontract Awarded to Aircraft Porous Media, $415Inc. by Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Group for Prime ContractF33657-83-C-2001

90-037 1ricing of Contract 1)AM1)17-85-C-5183 at Telefactor Corp. $33

90-039 Procurement of a Component Breakout Model by the Air $415Force Aeronautical Systems Division

90-041 Contracting Practices of the Institute for Defense Analyses $1,100

90-043 Plant Clearance Action on Government-Owned Property in $45,900the Possession of Defense Contractors

D-1

Potential Monetary BenefitsINSPECTOR GENERAL, l)ol), AUI)IT REPORTS ISSUED ($ in thousands)

CONTAINING QUANTIFIABLEPOTENTIAL MONETARY BENEFITS 2/ Disallowed Funds Put to

Costs 3/ Better Use

90-044 Pricing of Contract F09603-80-G-1840, Delivery Order $18

SI)IJ, at Aircraft Porous Media, Inc.

90-048 Administrative Control of Funds - I londuras $1,063

90-050 Requirements for Wholesale Inventories to Support the $12,000Target Acquisition Designation SightlPilot Night Vision SensorSystem

90-052 Stock Management at the National Security Agency $9,300

i In accordance with the Inspector General Act of1988.

21 A complete list ofaudit reports issued by the IG, l)o[), during the period is in appendix C.

31 None of the disallowed costs involve unsupported costs.

D-2

Additional information on or copies of this report may be obtainedby writing or contacting Paul Allison or Mary Jo Worcester at:

Inspector General, Department of DefenseAnalysis and Followup400 Army Navy DriveRoom 539Arlington, VA 22202

(Autovon 225-9599; commercial (202) 695-9599)