addressing community level gambling harm
TRANSCRIPT
International Gambling Conference : Preventing harm in the shifting gambling environment: Challenges, Policies & Strategies
Addressing Community Level Gambling Harm
Professor Sally Casswell Professor Helen Moewaka Barnes
Lisa Campbell
Acknowledgments
• Team:
Professor Sally Casswell, Professor Helen Moewaka Barnes, Professor Karen Witten, Dr Jeffery Adams, Dr Pauline Dickinson, Dr Taisia Huckle, Dr Martin Wall, Dr Lanuola Asiasiga, Dr En Li Lin, Karl Parker and the CATI team (Massey University) and Lisa Campbell, Sarah Woodward; Vicki Hirini (Salvation Army Oasis)
• Funding – Ministry of Health
Community Level Gambling Harm?
• Surprising lack of published research on ‘community’
• Individual measures– eg crime related to gambling
• Household impacts – eg financial impacts and arguments
• Lower socio economic neighbourhoods
• Cultural Issues
Assumption Community Level Harm exists and is important
• Phase 1 research – Existing data which might indicate wellbeing
at community level – Relationship with EGM venues
• NB correlational
• Phase 2 research– Literature search for relevant community level
interventions • Phase 3 community intervention (TSA)
Research Findings
• Variables with significant relationship with density of EGM venues – Higher crime levels, lower levels of social
cohesion and volunteering, more food parcels from TSA (controlling for DEP)
• No published examples of community level gambling interventions found but interventions focused on safety and social cohesion
Design and Methodology
• Four high deprivation communities– two Wellington, two Auckland– one intervention, one reference in each
region• Evaluation:
– small formative, process and outcome• Data:
– key informant interviews, TSA interviews and reports, community surveys, police data, EGM expenditure
Community Intervention
• Objectives: Short-term outcomes Intermediate
outcomes Evaluation measures
Increased security and environmental conditions around EGMs and in the locality
Safer environment
Perceptions of safety Perceptions of crime Perceptions of
environmental condition
Greater community involvement in alternative recreational activities and environments
Improved social cohesion/networks
Community involvement and use of recreation/social facilities
Social cohesion Social and Personal
wellbeing
Community Intervention – Pre Intervention Activities
• Engage with local communities • Perform safety audit around EGM venues
and shopping areas in both communities– Venue survey– Key stakeholder survey– Observation Checklist
• Map current recreational activities / programmes and assess needs
• Findings will help inform the interventions
Community Intervention – Pre Intervention Activities
• Developed semi structured questionnaire for safety audit based on CATI survey– Physical environment – Perceptions of safety – shopping areas,
venues– Lighting, surveillance, security presence– Policing– Crime as an issue in the community– Safety in wider community
Develop table/directory of community activities
Community Intervention – Pre Intervention Activities
• Time consuming to conduct the survey with community stakeholders– neighbourhood policing, local board
members, community development advisors, community steering groups, safety panel, Maori and Pacific Wardens, community / recreational centre managers, business etc.
• Some stakeholders cautious / positive• Range of perspectives • Changes in community roles• Transcribing & analysis time consuming
Community Interventions
• Environmental change – Implement community policing around EGMs
and in the community– Support Accord development with local
venues, police and businesses• Social cohesion
– Promote existing and develop more recreational activities
– Increase volunteer capacity of community
Community Interventions - Next Steps
• Collating findings of safety audit and CATI survey to present back to community - Feb
• Discuss findings and potential intervention ideas with community stakeholders to gain buy-in – March e.g. – Supporting current safety initiatives already in place,
NPT, M/P wardens, Ambassadors?– Possible interventions for Neighbours Day 19-20th
March 2016 re social cohesion?• Interventions to be driven by the community to
ensure sustainability• Many projects already underway