adjoint inversion of global nox emissions with sciamachy no 2 changsub shim, qinbin li, daven henze,...

14
Adjoint inversion of Global NOx emissions with SCIAMACHY NO 2 Changsub Shim, Qinbin Li, Daven Henze, Changsub Shim, Qinbin Li, Daven Henze, Aaron van Donkellaar, Randall Martin, Aaron van Donkellaar, Randall Martin, Kevin Bowman, Monika Kopacz, and Kevin Bowman, Monika Kopacz, and Annmarie Eldering Annmarie Eldering 4 th GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting Apr. 08, 2009

Post on 21-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Adjoint inversion of Global NOx emissions with SCIAMACHY NO2

Changsub Shim, Qinbin Li, Daven Henze, Aaron Changsub Shim, Qinbin Li, Daven Henze, Aaron van Donkellaar, Randall Martin, Kevin Bowman, van Donkellaar, Randall Martin, Kevin Bowman,

Monika Kopacz, and Annmarie ElderingMonika Kopacz, and Annmarie Eldering

4th GEOS-Chem User’s MeetingApr. 08, 2009

Global NOx emissions in GEOS-ChemGlobal NOx emissions in GEOS-Chem

NOx emissionsNOx emissions 2005 (a priori) 2001 (a) 2005 (b) %

Industry/urban23.6 (1998)

GEIA24

27.9 (2000)EDGAR

56 ~ 62

Biofuel 2.02 (1995) 2.2 2.03 (2000) 4.5 ~ 5

Soil/fertilizer 5.06 (c) 5.77 5.5 12 ~13

Biomass Burning

6.7 (Climatological

)6.5 (d)

5.41 (GFEDV2)

10 ~16

Lightning/aircraft

4.2 (f) 4.7 4.5 ~10

Total (Tg/yr) 42 (v6) 43 45 (v7) 100

(a): adapted from Park et al., (2004)(b): GEOS-Chem v7-1-3.(1998): GEIA anthropogenic emission inventory for year 1985 scaled to 1998 by CO2 emission trends [Bey et al., 2001; Marland et al., 1999].(2000): EDGAR anthropogenic emission inventory based on 2000.(c): Based on Yienger and Levy et al., (1995).(d): Climatological monthly biomass burning data (Duncan et al., 2003).(e): Monthly GFEDv2 biomass burning data. (f): Based on Wang et al., (1998)

ObjectiveObjective• Inversion of NOx emissions with consideration of physiochemical feedbacks with Inversion of NOx emissions with consideration of physiochemical feedbacks with

direct computing of parameter’s sensitivity direct computing of parameter’s sensitivity • Comparison with “top-down” emissions estimates (or mass balance approach) Comparison with “top-down” emissions estimates (or mass balance approach)

derived from satellite observations (e.g., Martin et al., 2003; 2006)derived from satellite observations (e.g., Martin et al., 2003; 2006)

AdvantageAdvantage • Can consider the chemical and physical feedbacks during optimizationCan consider the chemical and physical feedbacks during optimization

quantifying the parameter’s sensitivity w.r.t. model predictionsquantifying the parameter’s sensitivity w.r.t. model predictions• Optimization controlOptimization control

Disadvantage Disadvantage • Still Still computationally expenscomputationally expensiveive

Ex) 64 Intel Itanium2 processors (SGI architecture with LINUX)Ex) 64 Intel Itanium2 processors (SGI architecture with LINUX)• 1.5 GHz clock speed with 1MB Cache + 1GB RAM1.5 GHz clock speed with 1MB Cache + 1GB RAM• With parallel computing (8 CPUs)With parallel computing (8 CPUs) Each iteration for one month time window (2°x2.5°, globally) takes 44 hours.Each iteration for one month time window (2°x2.5°, globally) takes 44 hours.

Adjoint InversionAdjoint Inversion

Changsub Shim GEOS-Chem User’s meeting

SCIAMACHY NOSCIAMACHY NO22 from Dalhousie Univ (reprocessed data), filtered from Dalhousie Univ (reprocessed data), filtered cloud fraction > 40%.cloud fraction > 40%.

Adjoint of GEOS-Chem v6-2-5 & GEOS-4 & full chemistry (by D. Adjoint of GEOS-Chem v6-2-5 & GEOS-4 & full chemistry (by D. Henze) with 2°x2.5° horizontal resolutionHenze) with 2°x2.5° horizontal resolution

Time window: one month (Nov. 2005)Time window: one month (Nov. 2005) a week x 4 a week x 4

Emissions (NOx)Emissions (NOx)• GEIA anthropogenic NOx emission (scaled to 1998)GEIA anthropogenic NOx emission (scaled to 1998)• Climatological Biomass Burning(Duncan et al., 2003)Climatological Biomass Burning(Duncan et al., 2003)• Biofuel emissions (Yevich et al., 2003)Biofuel emissions (Yevich et al., 2003)• Soil NOx (Yienger and Levy(1995) & Wang(1998))Soil NOx (Yienger and Levy(1995) & Wang(1998))• Lightning NOx (Cloud Top Height; Price and Rind(1998) & Lightning NOx (Cloud Top Height; Price and Rind(1998) &

Pickering (1998)): only consider the total emissions for opt.Pickering (1998)): only consider the total emissions for opt.

Data (Nov. 2005)Data (Nov. 2005)

Changsub Shim GEOS-Chem User’s meeting

N.AmN.Am E.U.E.U. AsiaAsia S.Am.S.Am. AfricaAfrica R.WR.W

Ind1Ind1 5050 5050 100100 100100 100100 100100

Ind2Ind2 5050 5050 100100 100100 100100 100100

LightLight 200200 200200 200200 200200 200200 300300

SoilSoil 150150 150150 150150 150150 150150 150150

BBBB 150150 150150 150150 150150 150150 150150

BFBF 100100 100100 100100 100100 100100 100100

State vector errors (%)

Observation error = e1 + e2 + e3* e1: retrieval error from SCIAMACHY* e2: representation error : ~0.7 of e1 (~4.0x1013 molec/cm2)* e3: model transport error (from Jones et al., 2003) ~0.8 of e1 (~4.5x1013 molec/cm2)

total obs. error is about factor of ~2.5 of instrumental (retrieval) error

Same quantity of errors were applied to mass-balance approach

Error SpecificationError Specification

Relative instrument errors (%)

IterationIteration Norm of grad.Norm of grad. Cost func. Cost func. ratioratio

11 3.405D+033.405D+03 11

22 1.857D+031.857D+03 0.900.90

33 7.530D+027.530D+02 0.730.73

44 3.180D+023.180D+02 0.620.62

55 1.485D+021.485D+02 0.520.52

66 1.112D+031.112D+03 0.460.46

77 1.948D+021.948D+02 0.4030.403

88 8.180D+018.180D+01 0.3970.397

Cost function from obs. Vs from a priori = ~10: 1

Now cost function reached ~ 0.40 of initial value after 7th iteration

Gradient

Inversion ResultsInversion Results

Cost Function

Initial (a priori) 8th iteration (a posteriori)

SCIA SCIA

SCIAMACHY

CTM

CTM-SCIA

Inversion Results (A priori vs A posteriori) Unit: 1015 molecules/cm2 Nov. 2005

Inversion Results : Inversion Results : NOx emissionsNOx emissions ratio ratio ( ( a posteriori / a prioria posteriori / a priori))

Unit: Gg N/ month

Total NOx emissions (by adjoint method, Total NOx emissions (by adjoint method, Nov 2005)Nov 2005)

•Large reductions in N. Ame, Europe, and India

•Moderate reductions in Africa and S. Ame

• China shows mixed features

N.AmN.Am E.U.E.U. E.AsiaE.Asia IndiaIndia S.AmeS.Ame AfricaAfrica Aus.Aus. R.W.R.W. Total

IND1IND1 430430

(209)(209)220220

(154)(154)384384

(342)(342)95.495.4

(50.)(50.)74.374.3

(58)(58)103103

(64)(64)12.612.6

(13.6)(13.6)165165

(123)(123)1484

(1013)

IND2IND2 176176

(85)(85)202202

(136)(136)7.57.5

3.63.600 00 14.514.5

(8.)(8.)9.79.7

(10.2)(10.2)3232

(18)(18)442

(261)

Light.Light. 21.821.8

(21.1)(21.1)1010

(10)(10)5.35.3

(5.2)(5.2)1.61.6

(1.4)(1.4)62.362.3

(40)(40)53.453.4

(36)(36)12.312.3

(12.4)(12.4)23.323.3

(21.4)(21.4)190

(147)

SoilSoil 33.433.4

(30)(30)15.415.4

(15.3)(15.3)11.811.8

(11.6)(11.6)34.134.1

(25.2)(25.2)98.898.8

(85)(85)142142

(115)(115)38.738.7

(39.2)(39.2)24.824.8

(24)(24)399

(345)

BBBB 5.85.8

(5.6)(5.6)5.15.1

(5.1)(5.1)22.322.3

(19.2)(19.2)3.73.7

(3.)(3.)126126

(77)(77)276276

(173)(173)94.294.2

(89.4)(89.4)4545

(42)(42)578

(413)

BFBF 7.57.5

(6.9)(6.9)18.518.5

(18.2)(18.2)51.851.8

(50.0)(50.0)33.333.3

(25)(25)14.614.6

(13.4)(13.4)31.531.5

(27.7)(27.7)0.660.66

(0.65)(0.65)2424

(23)(23)182

(164)

TotalTotal 682682

(364)(364)490490

(357)(357)535535

(481)(481)202202

(130)(130)391391

(286)(286)652652

(451)(451)169169

(166)(166)338338

(273)(273)3456

(2507)

Global NOx emissions are lower by ~28% (Nov 2005): Annual proj. (42 vs 31 Tg N/yr) N.Ame (~48%) and Europe (~30%) have significant reduction in industrial NOx emissions (2005 vs 1998) A posteriori BB emissions are well matched with GFEDv2 (global total)

A priori / A posteriori (unit: Gg N/ month; Nov 2005)A priori / A posteriori (unit: Gg N/ month; Nov 2005)

• Some over-reduction over N. Ame and Europe• less reduction over S. Ame, Africa, and India

• Less increase over China and Australia

• No latitudinal correlations (Lifetime?)

22

22

lnln

lnlnlnlnln

ta

taat EEE

Comparison with Mass Balance emissions estimateComparison with Mass Balance emissions estimate

Based on Martin et al., (2003)

a Prioria Priori Mass-Mass-BalanceBalance

AdjointAdjoint

N. Ame.N. Ame. 682682 424 (-38%)424 (-38%) 364 (-47%)364 (-47%)

EuropeEurope 490490 410 (-16%)410 (-16%) 357 (-27%) 357 (-27%)

E. AsiaE. Asia 535535 687 687 (+28%)(+28%) 481 (-10%)481 (-10%)

IndiaIndia 202202 126 (-38%)126 (-38%) 130 (-36%)130 (-36%)

S. Ame.S. Ame. 391391 249 (-36%)249 (-36%) 286 (-27%)286 (-27%)

AfricaAfrica 652652 458 (-30%)458 (-30%) 451 (-31%)451 (-31%)

Aus.Aus. 169169 237 237 (+40%)(+40%) 166 (-2%)166 (-2%)

GlobalGlobal 34563456 2877 (-19%)2877 (-19%) 2507 (-28%)2507 (-28%)

A priori / Mass-Balance / Adjoint A priori / Mass-Balance / Adjoint (unit: Gg N/ month; Nov 2005)(unit: Gg N/ month; Nov 2005)

Changsub Shim GEOS-Chem User’s meeting

SCIAMACHY NO2 columns (Nov 2005) from Dalhousie Univ

Previous version Reprocessed (currently used)

Previous - reprocessed

Reprocessed SCIAMACHY•Improved in solar measurements, and cloud fields for signal fitting and AMF calculation

(1015Molecules/cm2)

ConclusionsConclusions

According to the adjoint inversion, the N.Ame and European According to the adjoint inversion, the N.Ame and European anthropogenic NOx emissions are greatly reduced by 48% anthropogenic NOx emissions are greatly reduced by 48% and 30% (1998 vs 2005)and 30% (1998 vs 2005)

Large increase in Chinese industrial NOx emissions is Large increase in Chinese industrial NOx emissions is evident by SCIAMACHY, but the adjoint inversion does not evident by SCIAMACHY, but the adjoint inversion does not represent enough enhancements represent enough enhancements

Natural a priori NOx emissions overestimated (Nov. 2005) Natural a priori NOx emissions overestimated (Nov. 2005) and a posteriori biomass burning emission is closer to and a posteriori biomass burning emission is closer to GFEDv2 in global totalGFEDv2 in global total

More ..More .. Comparison with recent emissions inventory for specific Comparison with recent emissions inventory for specific

regions (EPA, EMEP, Streets, etc..) will be continued.regions (EPA, EMEP, Streets, etc..) will be continued.

Changsub Shim GEOS-Chem User’s meeting