advisory committee on water information

33
Advisory Committee on Water Information Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data Herndon, VA September 10, 200

Upload: hyman

Post on 18-Mar-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Advisory Committee on Water Information. Status report: Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data. Herndon, VA September 10, 2003. “surface water geospatial framework”. Integration of key Spatial Water Datasets. National Elevation Dataset. National Hydrography Dataset. COMPLETE 30meter. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Advisory Committee on Water Information

Status report:

Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data

Herndon, VA September 10, 2003

Page 2: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Integration of key Spatial Water Datasets

National Elevation Dataset National Hydrography Dataset

Watershed Boundary DatasetNED-Hydrology

COMPLETE30meter

COMPLETE1:100K

IN PROGRESS1:24K

IN PROGRESS1:24K

IN PROGRESS1:24K

COMPLETE30meter

“surface water geospatial

framework”

Page 3: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Subcommittee’s role

encourage facilitate review

Page 4: Advisory Committee on Water Information

1/3 arc second NED

Page 5: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Interagency Development of a Reference Set of Watersheds for the

United StatesWBD

Page 6: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Hydrologic Units2-digit= 1st level = 22 regions

4-digit= 2nd level = 222 subregions

6-digit= 3rd level = 789 accounting

8-digit= 4th level = 2223 cataloging

10-digit= 5th level = ~22,000 watersheds

12-digit= 6th level = ~160,000 subwatersheds

new! WBD

Where are we?

Page 7: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 8: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Submittal ProjectionsWBD VERIFICATION PROCESS

Page 9: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Funded Working Groups

Salt Lake City USGSFt. Worth NRCSSacramento BORPhiladelphia EPAAtlanta USGSEROS Data Center USGS

Page 10: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 11: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Problematic States

Arizona: NRCS,USFS and BLM do not recognize need for 6th Level

Delineations.

Idaho: Lack of in-kind funding.

North Dakota: Inefficient process, minimal funding.

Minnesota: Too much detail is being added well beyond the needs of the WBD. Estimated completion date at the current rate is 15 years. Plenty of funding, but have not been amenable to changing process.

Louisiana: No local support.

New York: Inefficient process, lack of coordination.

New Jersey: Reluctant to modify existing dataset

Page 12: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Austin

WBD MEETINGS

Page 13: Advisory Committee on Water Information

FY04 Meetings

Portland, OR : Evaluation of NV, OR, ID, WA

Syracuse, NY : Evaluation of NY, VT, NJ, PA

Charleston, WV : Evaluation of WV, OH, VA

Planned

Needed

Minneapolis, MNMadison, WI New Orleans, LA

Columbia, SC : Wrap up of SC dataset

Phoenix, AZ

Page 14: Advisory Committee on Water Information

MeetingDetail

Page 15: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Subcommitteeon Spatial

Water Data

GuidelinesGuidelines

Work GroupWork Group Coastal Coastal

WatershedsWatershedsWork GroupWork Group

FGDCHUC unified

Guideline

National Hydrography Framework Standard

Hydro Standard Work Group

Page 16: Advisory Committee on Water Information

National Hydrography Framework Standard

• Develop formal Content Standard for Hydrography. – describe a general model (a data dictionary,

definitions, relationships) • application-independent, • supports international standards• facilitates the exchange of data.

Page 17: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Geospatial One-Stop• Key points

– Develop and implement Framework Data content standards

• Elevation• Orthoimagery• Hydrography• Administrative Boundaries• Transportation Networks• Cadastral• Geodetic Control

– Establish comprehensive Federal Portal – Director Hank Garie, USGS

Co-chairman, Scott Cameron, DOI

EGOV Initiative

Page 18: Advisory Committee on Water Information

NHD

Page 19: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 20: Advisory Committee on Water Information

NHD Partnerships

Page 21: Advisory Committee on Water Information

“high-res”NHD COMPLETE FY06

Page 22: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Density differences

Paper map

Page 23: Advisory Committee on Water Information

NHD Problem: Drainage Density Artifacts

0102030405060708090

1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr

EastWestNorth

reference paper map

Page 24: Advisory Committee on Water Information

FY04 THEME:

“interoperable”

Subcommittee on Spatial Water Data

Page 25: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Tying points to streams

Page 26: Advisory Committee on Water Information

• Making it:–Easier–Faster–Less expensive

Geospatial One Stop

Purpose of the project:

For all levels of government and the public to access geospatial information.

Page 27: Advisory Committee on Water Information

FederalFederal

CitiesCities

CountiesCounties

TribesTribes

• User Community• Data Searches• Map Services• Visualization

GOS PortalGOS Portal

DisasterDisasterManagementManagement

HomelandHomelandSecuritySecurity

RecreationRecreationOne StopOne Stop

Smart Smart GrowthGrowth

Citizen Citizen ServicesServices

Watershed Watershed ManagementManagement

Other E-gov Other E-gov Initiatives Initiatives

Integration ServicesIntegration ServicesSupport Government BusinessSupport Government Business

Support Decision MakingSupport Decision Making

AcademiaAcademia

StatesStates

PrivatePrivate

Page 28: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 29: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 30: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 31: Advisory Committee on Water Information
Page 32: Advisory Committee on Water Information

Request for “Data Category Managers”

Page 33: Advisory Committee on Water Information