ag findings v. bodega - complaint
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
1/51
Page 1 of 10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: _____________________________________
A.G. FINDINGS & MFG. CO., INC., d/b/aBALLISTIC CASE CO., a Florida corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
BODEGA CORP. D/B/A CASE-OLOGY, aCalifornia corporation,
Defendants.______________________________________/
VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR PATENTAND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT
AND UNFAIR COMPETITION
JURY DEMAND
VERIFIED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, A.G. FINDINGS & MFG. CO., INC., d/b/a BALLISTIC CASE CO., a Florida
corporation (hereinafter A.G. Findings), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby
alleges in its Complaint against Defendant, BODEGA CORP. D/B/A CASE-OLOGY, a
California corporation (hereinafter Bodega), as follows:
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. This is an action for patent and trade dress infringement and unfair competition
arising under 35 U.S.C. 271(a) and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1)(A).
2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C.
1331 and 1338(a)-(b), and 15 U.S.C. 1121(a), and the laws of the State of Florida, including
violations of the State of Floridas unfair competition laws under the Deceptive and Unfair Trade
Practices Act, Fla. Stat. 501.201 to 501.213.
3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) as a substantial part
of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this District.
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
2/51
Page 2 of 10
4. Defendant is subject to the specific personal jurisdiction of this Court under
Florida law, at least including Floridas long-arm statute. F.S. 48.193 (1)(b), (f)(1)-(2) and
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
THE PARTIES
5. A.G. Findings is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in
Sunrise, Florida.
6. Bodega is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 20160
Paseo Del Prado, # F, Walnut, California 91789.
7. Upon information and belief, Bodega is in the business of importing, making,
selling, and offering to sell infringing mobile device cases in this District and throughout the
United States, including in online catalogs accessible throughout the State of Florida.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A.G. Findings
8. A.G. Findings is well-known in the United States for designing and
manufacturing creative and protective mobile device cases. Using state-of-the-art materials and
fashionable designs, A.G. Findings is recognized in the industry for providing superior quality
and stylish products.
9. A.G. Findings markets, offers for sale, and sells protective mobile device cases
under the trademarks BALLISTIC and SG . The SG cases feature a distinctive combination
of protective and aesthetic features that have made the SG cases popular amongst consumers
and retailers. Indeed, sales of the SG cases eclipsed twenty million dollars since their first sale
and the SG cases are sold by service providers, such as AT&T and SPRINT throughout the
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
3/51
Page 3 of 10
United States and in this District, as well as by major retailers, such as Sams Club. A.G.
Findings has further spent over one million dollars marketing its SG cases throughout the
United States.
10. The SG case is offered for several makes and models of cell phones including
Samsung, Motorola, Apple, Blackberry, among others. A screenshot of an Apple iPhone 4/4S
SG is shown in Exhibit A as an exemplary A.G. Findings SG case make and model.
11. Each of the SG cases include aesthetic, non-functional features that consumers
recognize as emanating from A.G. Findings, or its Florida registered fictitious name, Ballistic.
In particular, each SG case includes aesthetic features on its corners, back and side portions,
and further includes an aesthetic arrangement of alternating lower durometer material with
higher durometer material, that make the overall appearance of the SG cases, regardless of the
make and model, recognizable by the consumers.
12. Owing to its distinctive aesthetic features, its substantial sales, and the vast
expenditure of advertising by A.G. Findings, the SG case has acquired secondary meaning with
consumers seeking to purchase a protective and stylish cell phone case, and who recognize the
aesthetic features and overall appearance of the SG case as emanating from Ballistic.
Accordingly, A.G. Findings has unregistered trade dress rights to its SG case.
13. A.G. Findings is the owner by assignment of U.S. Design Patent No. D682,260
issued on May 14, 2013 entitled MOBILE DEVICE CASE (the 260 Patent). Exhibit B. The
260 Patent is in full force and effect. The sole claim of the 260 Patent is directed toward a
mobile device case as shown in the drawings of the 260 Patent.
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
4/51
Page 4 of 10
Bodega
14. Bodega is a retailer of accessories for cellular telephones and other mobile
electronic devices Bodega sells its products throughout the United States and throughout the
world at least through its website at http://www.case-ology.com and through its eBay store
Case-ology.
15. Bodega is importing, marketing, offering for sale, and selling, mobile device
cases to consumers in this District under the brand name Dual Layer Diamond Studs Combo
Case, which cases are confusingly similar to the SG cases, and which cases are marketed and
sold to the same consumers that A.G. Findings sells its SG cases to. In particular, Bodega is
selling and/or offering for sale mobile device cases for many different models of Apple,
Samsung, Blackberry, and other makers mobile devices that incorporate the source identifying
non-functional features of the corresponding A.G. Findings SG case. Indeed, Bodegas
website offers for sale dozens of different cases in different colors that are each substantially
identical in appearance to A.G. Findings SG
cases. For example, a back view of a Dual
Layer Diamond Studs Combo Case brand protective case for the Nokia Lumia is shown in
Exhibit C. The Bodega case shown in Exhibit C is confusingly similar to the A.G. Findings
SG case shown in Exhibit B.
16. The Bodega case shown in Exhibit C embodies the patented design of the mobile
device case shown in the 260 Patent or is a colorable imitation thereof.
17. On June 8, 2012 undersigned counsel for A.G. Findings sent Bodega a cease and
desist letter demanding that Bodega, among other things, cease the importation and sale of
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
5/51
Page 5 of 10
Bodega counterfeit SG cases. Composite Exhibit E. The Bodega case shown in Exhibit D is
virtually identical to the A.G. Findings SG case shown in Exhibit B.
18. On November 15, 2012, undersigned counsel sent another cease and desist letter
to Bodega when Bodega changed the back of the case shown in Exhibit D to the present diamond
studded incarnation shown in Exhibit C. Composite Exhibit E. Despite Bodegas apparent
attempts to design around A.G. Findings trade dress, the diamond studded version of the
Bodega case shown in Exhibit C is confusingly similar to A.G. Findings trade dress. Thus,
undersigned counsel demanded that Bodega cease and desist from selling the case shown in
Exhibit C.
19. On April 5, 2013, undersigned counsel again sent Bodega a cease and desist letter
as a follow-up to its June 8, 2012 and November 15, 2012 letters vis--vis A.G. Findings SG
cases and the continued sales of the cases shown in Exhibit C. Composite Exhibit E. No response
to any of undersigned counsels letters was received from Bodega.
20. Bodega has willfully continued to offer for sale and sell counterfeit SG cases
since at least July 5, 2012.
COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATESDESIGN PATENT NO. D682,260
(FLA. STAT. 35 U.S.C. 271)
21. A.G. Findings incorporates paragraphs 1- 20 from above.
22. Defendant has been and still is directly infringing the 260 patent by, upon
information and belief, importing, making, selling, offering for sale and using certain mobile
device cases that incorporate the invention disclosed in the 260 Patent, including, without
limitation, the mobile device cases shown in Exhibit C attached hereto.
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 5 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
6/51
Page 6 of 10
23. Defendants conduct has caused, and, if not enjoined, will continue to cause,
irreparable harm and damage to the rights of A.G. Findings in its business, reputation, and
goodwill.
COUNT II TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT15 U.S.C. 1125(a)
24. A.G. Findings incorporates paragraphs 1- 20 from above.
25. Defendants mobile device cases incorporate the non-functional aesthetic features
of A.G. Findings SG cases that have acquired secondary meaning in the marketplace.
26. Defendants offering for sale and/or sale the mobile device cases identified above
is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association
of defendants with A.G. Findings, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of defendants
mobile device cases by A.G. Findings.
27. Defendants conduct has caused, and, if not enjoined, will continue to cause,
irreparable harm and damage to the rights of A.G. Findings in its business, reputation, and
goodwill.
COUNT III FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT(FLA. STAT. 501.201 TO 501.213)
28. A.G. Findings incorporates paragraphs 1-20 from above.
29. Defendants actions constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair or
deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce in violation of Florida Statute
501.204.
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 6 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
7/51
Page 7 of 10
30. Defendant willfully used or practiced these unlawful acts under 501.204, and
knew or should have known that its acts were unlawful and would damage A.G. Findings and
injure consumers deceptively.
31. A.G. Findings has been damaged directly and proximately by defendants
unlawful actions.
32. A.G. Findings is entitled to recover actual damages, plus reasonable attorneys
fees and costs for defendants violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
JURY DEMAND
33. A.G. Findings requests trial by a jury for all issues so triable.
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 7 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
8/51
Page 8 of 10
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
A.G. Findings requests the Court:
A. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and/or Ch. 501, Florida Statutes, award A.G. Findings
actual damages, attorneys fees and court costs.
B. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283 and/or 15 U.S.C. 1116(a), enjoin the importation and
sale of any and all of defendants products that are infringements of A.G. Findings
design patent and/or are likely to cause confusion in the marketplace with A.G.
Findings products;
C. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and/or 289 and/or 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), order
defendants to pay to A.G. Findings any profits realized from the sale of any infringing
products, any damages sustained by A.G. Findings, and the cost of this action;
D. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1118, order defendants to deliver to A.G. Findings for
destruction, all labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, and
advertisements in the possession of defendants bearing the trade dress subject of the
violation, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation thereof, and
all plates, molds, matrices, and other means of making the same; and
E. Award A.G. Findings such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 8 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
9/51
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
10/51
! " # $ ! % # & & $ ! ' ' ( ' ! ) & 0 0 ' & % 0 ! 1 0 1 2 0 3 &
' & & & % 0 ! & 0 ! ) & ! ( ' 4 0 ! ! 4 & & 0 & " ) & 0 % # 5 0 6 ' 1 ' " % '
' ( # ( & 0 ! 7 ' & 0 5 & ) $ ! % 4 & 0 ) & 3 & % % & ) 4 & 0 8
9 & ' @ A ( # B C D E B F
G 1 B E 0 % B E
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 10 of 10
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
11/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 2
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
12/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 2
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
13/51
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
)
)))))))))))
Plaintiff(s)
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant(s)
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendants name and address)
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,whose name and address are:
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 2
Southern District of Florida
A.G. FINDINGS & MFG. CO., INC., d/b/a
BALLISTIC CASE CO., a Florida corporation
BODEGA CORP. D/B/A CASE-OLOGY, a Californiacorporation
Bodega Corp d/b/a Case-Ology20160 Paseo Del Prado, # FWalnut, CA 91789
Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.200 East Las Olas BoulevardSuite 2040Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
14/51
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))
This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)
was received by me on (date) .
I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)
on (date) ; or
I left the summons at the individuals residence or usual place of abode with (name)
, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,
on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individuals last known address; or
I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is
designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)
on (date) ; or
I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
Other (specify):
.
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:Servers signature
Printed name and title
Servers address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 2
0.00
Print Save As... Reset
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
15/51
EXHIBIT A
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 3
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
16/51
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
17/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 3
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
18/51
EXHIBIT B
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
19/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
20/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
21/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
22/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 5 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
23/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 6 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
24/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 7 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
25/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 8 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
26/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 9 of 9
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
27/51
EXHIBIT C
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 4
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
28/51
Back to Store | Listed in category: Cell Phones & Accessories > Cell Phone Accessories > Cases, Covers & Skins
All Categories SeaShop bycategory
Daily DealsHi! Sign in or register
PURPLE BLK DUAL LAYER IMPACT DIAMOND STUDS COMBO CASE COVELUMIA 928
Have one to sell? Sell it yourself
Visit store:
Seller informationcase_ology (131218 )99.3% Positive feedback
Save this seller
See other items
Case Ology Sh
Itemcondition:
New
Time left: 6d 10h (Jul 25, 2013 17:49:57 PDT)
Starting bid: US $11.00 [ 0 bid ]
Place bidEnter US $11.00 or more
Add to Watch list
Shipping: FREE Standard Shipping | See detailsItem location: Walnut, California, United StatesShips to: United States, Canada See exclusions
Delivery: Estimated on or before Tue. Jul. 30 to 33305
Payments: , Bill Me Later | See details
Returns: 14 days money back, buyer pays return shipping| Read details
New customers get $10 back on 1st purchaseSubject to credit approval. See terms
Learn more
People who viewed this item also viewed
Description Shipping and payments
Item numbe
Feedback
Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.
Item specifics
Condition: Type: Fitted Cases/Skins
Compatible Brand: NOKIA Lumia 928 Brand: Case Ology
Material: Polycarbonate And Silicone Combo MPN: NOK928-TRI-PPBK-STUDS
Color: Purple
$0.94
Purple Hard Shell
Protector Case Cover...
$9.95
PURPLE BLK DUAL
LAYER IMPACT...
Free shipping
$10.40
Original Rubber
Rubberized Back Cov...
Free shipping
$4.66
Rubber Soft Case
Cover for Nokia Lumia920...
Free shipping
$4.
Rubb
Cove620..
Free i i
Print
My eBay Sell Community Customer Sup
Page 1 of 3Purple Blk Dual Layer Impact Diamond Studs Combo Case Cover for Nokia Lumia 928 | ...
7/19/2013http://www.ebay.com/itm/PURPLE-BLK-DUAL-LAYER-IMPACT-DIAMOND-STUDS-...
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 4
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
29/51
SHOP BY BRAND
Select Your Device Below
ACER
AMAZON
APPLE
ASUS
BLACKBERRY
GOOGLE
HP
HTC
HUAWEI
KYOCERA
LG
MOTOROLA
NOKIA
PANTECH
SAMSUNG
SANYO
SONY
SONY ERICSSON
ZTE
PURPLE BLK DUAL LAYER IMPACT DIAMOND STUDS COCASE COVER FOR NOKIA LUMIA 928
Quick Overview
Give your new phone the protection it deserves with this new heavycase! This case protects against scratches and scuffs, and allows ysome style to your phone while still having total access to all buttonscontrols.
Click On Images To Switch Views
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
The Triple Impact case offers slick looking protection for your phone. The case features 2 layers of protection. The main partcase is made out of silicone gel that covers the entire phone. The 2nd layer is a hard plastic/TPU hybrid shell that covers theand sides of the silicone gel as shown in the pictures. The case also features diamond studs to give it a unique look. Your phoremains fully functional while in the case with access to all the phones features. If you need heavy duty protection look no furtprotect your device with a Triple Impact case.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
MADE FOR NOKIA Lumia 928
MATERIAL Polycarbonate And Silicone Combo
SHIPPING POLICY
CASE OLOGY is an U.S. online retailer providing premium products to customers all over the world!
Most orders are to be shipped within 1-3 business day after payment is completed, unless for items on back order. In case of order, seller will contact buyer as soon as possible to update the next shipping schedule or advise buyer for other color/style/which is in stock. We reserve the right to refund any backorders.
All order will be ship to confirmed Paypal address, no exception. In order to provide quick turn around in shipment, we do notchange address under any circumstances, please update your Paypal address before submitting the payment.
For International Shipment:
Seller reserved the right not to sell certain country with high risk of unable to deliver/custom issue. Buyer's discretion if item shto be wrong, defective. We will do our best to provide you with best eBay service, however once item left our warehouse we alonger in control of package's destiny. Please be selective on your designated currier.
USPS Express are recommended.
USPS First Class / International / Priority only have custom number, not tracking number.
RETURN POLICY
Case Ology offer a 14-day return plicy from the date of shipment receiving by buyers. If you are over the 14-day return period,will do our best to help you find what you are looking for. The amount (minus Shipping/Handling) will be funded back to you thsame method you made the payment. For damaged or defective items we will ha ppily exchange it for you
If you are not satisfied, please let us know before leaving feedback! We want you to be 100% satisfied with your order. Whenreceived your order, please take a moment to leave us positive feedback and 5 star rating on eBay to us is appreciated, vitalvery valuable to the continued success of our business.
Questions and answers about this item
No questions or answers have been posted about this item.
Page 2 of 3Purple Blk Dual Layer Impact Diamond Studs Combo Case Cover for Nokia Lumia 928 | ...
7/19/2013http://www.ebay.com/itm/PURPLE-BLK-DUAL-LAYER-IMPACT-DIAMOND-STUDS-...
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 4
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
30/51
Ask a question
00001
AdChoice
More to explore : Nokia Lumia 710 Case Purple , Case Cover Nokia Lumia 920 , Nokia Lumia 810 Cover , Nokia Lumia 820 Cover , Nokia Lumia 800 Case , Nokia Lumia 710 Leather Case ,Nokia Lumia 900 Case , Nokia Lumia 900 Phone Covers , Diamond Crystal Case Cover for iPhone 5 , Phone Cases for Nokia Lumia 900 , iPhone 4 Case Impact Combo , iPhone 4 Dual LayiPhone 5 Dual Layer Case
Sponsored Links
Diamond Studs At 75% Off Best Price Guarantee, Lab Certified Free FedEx & Free Luxury Gift Boxwww.diamondstuds4less.com/
Diamond StudsFine Diamond Jewelry. Necklaces, Earrings and Bracelets. Adventura.www.kings1912.com/
Diamond Stud ClearanceUp to 75% Off Real Diamond Studs . Free Shipping + Lifetime Guarantee!www.superjeweler.com/DiamondStuds
Combos Official SiteGrab Some Combos Today & Read Our Guide to the Combivore Lifestyle!www.facebook.com/combos
40-80% Off Grade DiamondsPersonal Diamond Search Service. We Get You the Best DealGuaranteedwww.diamondconciergeservice.com/GI
Dual Layer - QuillOrder Technology at Quill & Get Fast And Free Shipping, No Minimum!www.quill.com/Dual-Layer-DVD
Diamond at HSN Find the Perfect Diamond Earrings & more Jewelry at HSN!www.hsn.com/
Back to Store
About eBay Community Announcements Security Center Policies Site Map eBay official time Preview new features Contact us Tell us what you think
Copyright 1995-2013 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. User Agreement and Privacy Policy .
Page 3 of 3Purple Blk Dual Layer Impact Diamond Studs Combo Case Cover for Nokia Lumia 928 | ...
7/19/2013http://www.ebay.com/itm/PURPLE-BLK-DUAL-LAYER-IMPACT-DIAMOND-STUDS-...
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 4
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
31/51
EXHIBIT D
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 2
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
32/51
Home | Shop By Device | Pink Trim Triple Impact Hard Case For APPLE iPhone 5
MY CART
You have no items in your shopping cart.
COMPARE PRODUCTS
You have no items to compare.
NEWSLETTER
Newsletter Sign-up:
Enter your email address
PINK TRIM TRIPLE IMPACT HARD CASE FOR APPLE IPHONE 5
Email to a Friend
Be the first to review this product
Availability: In stock
$13.95
Quick Overview
Give your new phone the protection it deserves with this new heavy duty
case! This case protects against scratches and scuffs, and allows you to add
some style to your phone while still having total access to all buttons and
controls.
Add to Wishlist Add to Compare
Qty: 1
Double click on above image to view ful l picture
MORE VIEWS
PRODUCT DESCRIPTION
The Triple Impact case offers slick looking protection for your phone. The case features 2 layers of protection. The main part of the
case is made out of silicone gel that covers the entire phone. The 2nd layer is a hard plastic shell t hat covers the back and sides of
the silicone gel as shown in the pictures. Your phone remains fully functional while in the case with access to all the phones
features. If you need heavy duty protection look no further, protect your device with a Triple Impact case.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
PRODUCT TAGS
Use spaces to separate tags. Use single quotes (') for phrases.
Materials Polycarbonate And Silicone Combo
Made For APPLE iPhone 5
Add Your Tags:
Submit
Add to Cart
Add Tags
Page 1 of 1Pink Trim Triple Impact Hard Case For APPLE iPhone 5 - Shop By Device
7/9/2013http://www.case-ology.com/shop-by-device/pink-trim-triple-impact-hard-case-for-apple-iph...
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 2
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
33/51
EXHIBIT E
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
34/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
35/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
36/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
37/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 5 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
38/51
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
39/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 7 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
40/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 8 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
41/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 9 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
42/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 10 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
43/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 11 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
44/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 12 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
45/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 13 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
46/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 14 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
47/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 15 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
48/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 16 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
49/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 17 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
50/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 18 of 19
-
7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint
51/51
Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 19 of 19