ag findings v. bodega - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 03-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    1/51

    Page 1 of 10

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

    CASE NO.: _____________________________________

    A.G. FINDINGS & MFG. CO., INC., d/b/aBALLISTIC CASE CO., a Florida corporation,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    BODEGA CORP. D/B/A CASE-OLOGY, aCalifornia corporation,

    Defendants.______________________________________/

    VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR PATENTAND TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT

    AND UNFAIR COMPETITION

    JURY DEMAND

    VERIFIED COMPLAINT

    Plaintiff, A.G. FINDINGS & MFG. CO., INC., d/b/a BALLISTIC CASE CO., a Florida

    corporation (hereinafter A.G. Findings), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby

    alleges in its Complaint against Defendant, BODEGA CORP. D/B/A CASE-OLOGY, a

    California corporation (hereinafter Bodega), as follows:

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    1. This is an action for patent and trade dress infringement and unfair competition

    arising under 35 U.S.C. 271(a) and the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a)(1)(A).

    2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28 U.S.C.

    1331 and 1338(a)-(b), and 15 U.S.C. 1121(a), and the laws of the State of Florida, including

    violations of the State of Floridas unfair competition laws under the Deceptive and Unfair Trade

    Practices Act, Fla. Stat. 501.201 to 501.213.

    3. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2) as a substantial part

    of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in this District.

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    2/51

    Page 2 of 10

    4. Defendant is subject to the specific personal jurisdiction of this Court under

    Florida law, at least including Floridas long-arm statute. F.S. 48.193 (1)(b), (f)(1)-(2) and

    Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.

    THE PARTIES

    5. A.G. Findings is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in

    Sunrise, Florida.

    6. Bodega is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 20160

    Paseo Del Prado, # F, Walnut, California 91789.

    7. Upon information and belief, Bodega is in the business of importing, making,

    selling, and offering to sell infringing mobile device cases in this District and throughout the

    United States, including in online catalogs accessible throughout the State of Florida.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    A.G. Findings

    8. A.G. Findings is well-known in the United States for designing and

    manufacturing creative and protective mobile device cases. Using state-of-the-art materials and

    fashionable designs, A.G. Findings is recognized in the industry for providing superior quality

    and stylish products.

    9. A.G. Findings markets, offers for sale, and sells protective mobile device cases

    under the trademarks BALLISTIC and SG . The SG cases feature a distinctive combination

    of protective and aesthetic features that have made the SG cases popular amongst consumers

    and retailers. Indeed, sales of the SG cases eclipsed twenty million dollars since their first sale

    and the SG cases are sold by service providers, such as AT&T and SPRINT throughout the

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    3/51

    Page 3 of 10

    United States and in this District, as well as by major retailers, such as Sams Club. A.G.

    Findings has further spent over one million dollars marketing its SG cases throughout the

    United States.

    10. The SG case is offered for several makes and models of cell phones including

    Samsung, Motorola, Apple, Blackberry, among others. A screenshot of an Apple iPhone 4/4S

    SG is shown in Exhibit A as an exemplary A.G. Findings SG case make and model.

    11. Each of the SG cases include aesthetic, non-functional features that consumers

    recognize as emanating from A.G. Findings, or its Florida registered fictitious name, Ballistic.

    In particular, each SG case includes aesthetic features on its corners, back and side portions,

    and further includes an aesthetic arrangement of alternating lower durometer material with

    higher durometer material, that make the overall appearance of the SG cases, regardless of the

    make and model, recognizable by the consumers.

    12. Owing to its distinctive aesthetic features, its substantial sales, and the vast

    expenditure of advertising by A.G. Findings, the SG case has acquired secondary meaning with

    consumers seeking to purchase a protective and stylish cell phone case, and who recognize the

    aesthetic features and overall appearance of the SG case as emanating from Ballistic.

    Accordingly, A.G. Findings has unregistered trade dress rights to its SG case.

    13. A.G. Findings is the owner by assignment of U.S. Design Patent No. D682,260

    issued on May 14, 2013 entitled MOBILE DEVICE CASE (the 260 Patent). Exhibit B. The

    260 Patent is in full force and effect. The sole claim of the 260 Patent is directed toward a

    mobile device case as shown in the drawings of the 260 Patent.

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    4/51

    Page 4 of 10

    Bodega

    14. Bodega is a retailer of accessories for cellular telephones and other mobile

    electronic devices Bodega sells its products throughout the United States and throughout the

    world at least through its website at http://www.case-ology.com and through its eBay store

    Case-ology.

    15. Bodega is importing, marketing, offering for sale, and selling, mobile device

    cases to consumers in this District under the brand name Dual Layer Diamond Studs Combo

    Case, which cases are confusingly similar to the SG cases, and which cases are marketed and

    sold to the same consumers that A.G. Findings sells its SG cases to. In particular, Bodega is

    selling and/or offering for sale mobile device cases for many different models of Apple,

    Samsung, Blackberry, and other makers mobile devices that incorporate the source identifying

    non-functional features of the corresponding A.G. Findings SG case. Indeed, Bodegas

    website offers for sale dozens of different cases in different colors that are each substantially

    identical in appearance to A.G. Findings SG

    cases. For example, a back view of a Dual

    Layer Diamond Studs Combo Case brand protective case for the Nokia Lumia is shown in

    Exhibit C. The Bodega case shown in Exhibit C is confusingly similar to the A.G. Findings

    SG case shown in Exhibit B.

    16. The Bodega case shown in Exhibit C embodies the patented design of the mobile

    device case shown in the 260 Patent or is a colorable imitation thereof.

    17. On June 8, 2012 undersigned counsel for A.G. Findings sent Bodega a cease and

    desist letter demanding that Bodega, among other things, cease the importation and sale of

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    5/51

    Page 5 of 10

    Bodega counterfeit SG cases. Composite Exhibit E. The Bodega case shown in Exhibit D is

    virtually identical to the A.G. Findings SG case shown in Exhibit B.

    18. On November 15, 2012, undersigned counsel sent another cease and desist letter

    to Bodega when Bodega changed the back of the case shown in Exhibit D to the present diamond

    studded incarnation shown in Exhibit C. Composite Exhibit E. Despite Bodegas apparent

    attempts to design around A.G. Findings trade dress, the diamond studded version of the

    Bodega case shown in Exhibit C is confusingly similar to A.G. Findings trade dress. Thus,

    undersigned counsel demanded that Bodega cease and desist from selling the case shown in

    Exhibit C.

    19. On April 5, 2013, undersigned counsel again sent Bodega a cease and desist letter

    as a follow-up to its June 8, 2012 and November 15, 2012 letters vis--vis A.G. Findings SG

    cases and the continued sales of the cases shown in Exhibit C. Composite Exhibit E. No response

    to any of undersigned counsels letters was received from Bodega.

    20. Bodega has willfully continued to offer for sale and sell counterfeit SG cases

    since at least July 5, 2012.

    COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF UNITED STATESDESIGN PATENT NO. D682,260

    (FLA. STAT. 35 U.S.C. 271)

    21. A.G. Findings incorporates paragraphs 1- 20 from above.

    22. Defendant has been and still is directly infringing the 260 patent by, upon

    information and belief, importing, making, selling, offering for sale and using certain mobile

    device cases that incorporate the invention disclosed in the 260 Patent, including, without

    limitation, the mobile device cases shown in Exhibit C attached hereto.

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 5 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    6/51

    Page 6 of 10

    23. Defendants conduct has caused, and, if not enjoined, will continue to cause,

    irreparable harm and damage to the rights of A.G. Findings in its business, reputation, and

    goodwill.

    COUNT II TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT15 U.S.C. 1125(a)

    24. A.G. Findings incorporates paragraphs 1- 20 from above.

    25. Defendants mobile device cases incorporate the non-functional aesthetic features

    of A.G. Findings SG cases that have acquired secondary meaning in the marketplace.

    26. Defendants offering for sale and/or sale the mobile device cases identified above

    is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association

    of defendants with A.G. Findings, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of defendants

    mobile device cases by A.G. Findings.

    27. Defendants conduct has caused, and, if not enjoined, will continue to cause,

    irreparable harm and damage to the rights of A.G. Findings in its business, reputation, and

    goodwill.

    COUNT III FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT(FLA. STAT. 501.201 TO 501.213)

    28. A.G. Findings incorporates paragraphs 1-20 from above.

    29. Defendants actions constitute unfair methods of competition and unfair or

    deceptive acts or practices in the conduct of trade or commerce in violation of Florida Statute

    501.204.

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 6 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    7/51

    Page 7 of 10

    30. Defendant willfully used or practiced these unlawful acts under 501.204, and

    knew or should have known that its acts were unlawful and would damage A.G. Findings and

    injure consumers deceptively.

    31. A.G. Findings has been damaged directly and proximately by defendants

    unlawful actions.

    32. A.G. Findings is entitled to recover actual damages, plus reasonable attorneys

    fees and costs for defendants violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.

    JURY DEMAND

    33. A.G. Findings requests trial by a jury for all issues so triable.

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 7 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    8/51

    Page 8 of 10

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    A.G. Findings requests the Court:

    A. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285 and/or Ch. 501, Florida Statutes, award A.G. Findings

    actual damages, attorneys fees and court costs.

    B. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283 and/or 15 U.S.C. 1116(a), enjoin the importation and

    sale of any and all of defendants products that are infringements of A.G. Findings

    design patent and/or are likely to cause confusion in the marketplace with A.G.

    Findings products;

    C. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 284 and/or 289 and/or 15 U.S.C. 1117(a), order

    defendants to pay to A.G. Findings any profits realized from the sale of any infringing

    products, any damages sustained by A.G. Findings, and the cost of this action;

    D. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1118, order defendants to deliver to A.G. Findings for

    destruction, all labels, signs, prints, packages, wrappers, receptacles, and

    advertisements in the possession of defendants bearing the trade dress subject of the

    violation, or any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation thereof, and

    all plates, molds, matrices, and other means of making the same; and

    E. Award A.G. Findings such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 8 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    9/51

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    10/51

    ! " # $ ! % # & & $ ! ' ' ( ' ! ) & 0 0 ' & % 0 ! 1 0 1 2 0 3 &

    ' & & & % 0 ! & 0 ! ) & ! ( ' 4 0 ! ! 4 & & 0 & " ) & 0 % # 5 0 6 ' 1 ' " % '

    ' ( # ( & 0 ! 7 ' & 0 5 & ) $ ! % 4 & 0 ) & 3 & % % & ) 4 & 0 8

    9 & ' @ A ( # B C D E B F

    G 1 B E 0 % B E

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 10 of 10

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    11/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 2

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    12/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 2

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    13/51

    AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

    U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

    __________ District of __________

    )

    )))))))))))

    Plaintiff(s)

    v. Civil Action No.

    Defendant(s)

    SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

    To: (Defendants name and address)

    A lawsuit has been filed against you.

    Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) or 60 days if you

    are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney,whose name and address are:

    If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

    CLERK OF COURT

    Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 2

    Southern District of Florida

    A.G. FINDINGS & MFG. CO., INC., d/b/a

    BALLISTIC CASE CO., a Florida corporation

    BODEGA CORP. D/B/A CASE-OLOGY, a Californiacorporation

    Bodega Corp d/b/a Case-Ology20160 Paseo Del Prado, # FWalnut, CA 91789

    Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.200 East Las Olas BoulevardSuite 2040Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    14/51

    AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

    Civil Action No.

    PROOF OF SERVICE

    (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

    This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

    was received by me on (date) .

    I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

    on (date) ; or

    I left the summons at the individuals residence or usual place of abode with (name)

    , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

    on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individuals last known address; or

    I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

    designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

    on (date) ; or

    I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

    Other (specify):

    .

    My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

    I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

    Date:Servers signature

    Printed name and title

    Servers address

    Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-2 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 2

    0.00

    Print Save As... Reset

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    15/51

    EXHIBIT A

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 3

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    16/51

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    17/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 3

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    18/51

    EXHIBIT B

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    19/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    20/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    21/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    22/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 5 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    23/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 6 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    24/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 7 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    25/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 8 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    26/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-4 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 9 of 9

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    27/51

    EXHIBIT C

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 4

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    28/51

    Back to Store | Listed in category: Cell Phones & Accessories > Cell Phone Accessories > Cases, Covers & Skins

    All Categories SeaShop bycategory

    Daily DealsHi! Sign in or register

    PURPLE BLK DUAL LAYER IMPACT DIAMOND STUDS COMBO CASE COVELUMIA 928

    Have one to sell? Sell it yourself

    Visit store:

    Seller informationcase_ology (131218 )99.3% Positive feedback

    Save this seller

    See other items

    Case Ology Sh

    Itemcondition:

    New

    Time left: 6d 10h (Jul 25, 2013 17:49:57 PDT)

    Starting bid: US $11.00 [ 0 bid ]

    Place bidEnter US $11.00 or more

    Add to Watch list

    Shipping: FREE Standard Shipping | See detailsItem location: Walnut, California, United StatesShips to: United States, Canada See exclusions

    Delivery: Estimated on or before Tue. Jul. 30 to 33305

    Payments: , Bill Me Later | See details

    Returns: 14 days money back, buyer pays return shipping| Read details

    New customers get $10 back on 1st purchaseSubject to credit approval. See terms

    Learn more

    People who viewed this item also viewed

    Description Shipping and payments

    Item numbe

    Feedback

    Seller assumes all responsibility for this listing.

    Item specifics

    Condition: Type: Fitted Cases/Skins

    Compatible Brand: NOKIA Lumia 928 Brand: Case Ology

    Material: Polycarbonate And Silicone Combo MPN: NOK928-TRI-PPBK-STUDS

    Color: Purple

    $0.94

    Purple Hard Shell

    Protector Case Cover...

    $9.95

    PURPLE BLK DUAL

    LAYER IMPACT...

    Free shipping

    $10.40

    Original Rubber

    Rubberized Back Cov...

    Free shipping

    $4.66

    Rubber Soft Case

    Cover for Nokia Lumia920...

    Free shipping

    $4.

    Rubb

    Cove620..

    Free i i

    Print

    My eBay Sell Community Customer Sup

    Page 1 of 3Purple Blk Dual Layer Impact Diamond Studs Combo Case Cover for Nokia Lumia 928 | ...

    7/19/2013http://www.ebay.com/itm/PURPLE-BLK-DUAL-LAYER-IMPACT-DIAMOND-STUDS-...

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 4

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    29/51

    SHOP BY BRAND

    Select Your Device Below

    ACER

    AMAZON

    APPLE

    ASUS

    BLACKBERRY

    GOOGLE

    HP

    HTC

    HUAWEI

    KYOCERA

    LG

    MOTOROLA

    NOKIA

    PANTECH

    SAMSUNG

    SANYO

    SONY

    SONY ERICSSON

    ZTE

    PURPLE BLK DUAL LAYER IMPACT DIAMOND STUDS COCASE COVER FOR NOKIA LUMIA 928

    Quick Overview

    Give your new phone the protection it deserves with this new heavycase! This case protects against scratches and scuffs, and allows ysome style to your phone while still having total access to all buttonscontrols.

    Click On Images To Switch Views

    PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

    The Triple Impact case offers slick looking protection for your phone. The case features 2 layers of protection. The main partcase is made out of silicone gel that covers the entire phone. The 2nd layer is a hard plastic/TPU hybrid shell that covers theand sides of the silicone gel as shown in the pictures. The case also features diamond studs to give it a unique look. Your phoremains fully functional while in the case with access to all the phones features. If you need heavy duty protection look no furtprotect your device with a Triple Impact case.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    MADE FOR NOKIA Lumia 928

    MATERIAL Polycarbonate And Silicone Combo

    SHIPPING POLICY

    CASE OLOGY is an U.S. online retailer providing premium products to customers all over the world!

    Most orders are to be shipped within 1-3 business day after payment is completed, unless for items on back order. In case of order, seller will contact buyer as soon as possible to update the next shipping schedule or advise buyer for other color/style/which is in stock. We reserve the right to refund any backorders.

    All order will be ship to confirmed Paypal address, no exception. In order to provide quick turn around in shipment, we do notchange address under any circumstances, please update your Paypal address before submitting the payment.

    For International Shipment:

    Seller reserved the right not to sell certain country with high risk of unable to deliver/custom issue. Buyer's discretion if item shto be wrong, defective. We will do our best to provide you with best eBay service, however once item left our warehouse we alonger in control of package's destiny. Please be selective on your designated currier.

    USPS Express are recommended.

    USPS First Class / International / Priority only have custom number, not tracking number.

    RETURN POLICY

    Case Ology offer a 14-day return plicy from the date of shipment receiving by buyers. If you are over the 14-day return period,will do our best to help you find what you are looking for. The amount (minus Shipping/Handling) will be funded back to you thsame method you made the payment. For damaged or defective items we will ha ppily exchange it for you

    If you are not satisfied, please let us know before leaving feedback! We want you to be 100% satisfied with your order. Whenreceived your order, please take a moment to leave us positive feedback and 5 star rating on eBay to us is appreciated, vitalvery valuable to the continued success of our business.

    Questions and answers about this item

    No questions or answers have been posted about this item.

    Page 2 of 3Purple Blk Dual Layer Impact Diamond Studs Combo Case Cover for Nokia Lumia 928 | ...

    7/19/2013http://www.ebay.com/itm/PURPLE-BLK-DUAL-LAYER-IMPACT-DIAMOND-STUDS-...

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 4

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    30/51

    Ask a question

    00001

    AdChoice

    More to explore : Nokia Lumia 710 Case Purple , Case Cover Nokia Lumia 920 , Nokia Lumia 810 Cover , Nokia Lumia 820 Cover , Nokia Lumia 800 Case , Nokia Lumia 710 Leather Case ,Nokia Lumia 900 Case , Nokia Lumia 900 Phone Covers , Diamond Crystal Case Cover for iPhone 5 , Phone Cases for Nokia Lumia 900 , iPhone 4 Case Impact Combo , iPhone 4 Dual LayiPhone 5 Dual Layer Case

    Sponsored Links

    Diamond Studs At 75% Off Best Price Guarantee, Lab Certified Free FedEx & Free Luxury Gift Boxwww.diamondstuds4less.com/

    Diamond StudsFine Diamond Jewelry. Necklaces, Earrings and Bracelets. Adventura.www.kings1912.com/

    Diamond Stud ClearanceUp to 75% Off Real Diamond Studs . Free Shipping + Lifetime Guarantee!www.superjeweler.com/DiamondStuds

    Combos Official SiteGrab Some Combos Today & Read Our Guide to the Combivore Lifestyle!www.facebook.com/combos

    40-80% Off Grade DiamondsPersonal Diamond Search Service. We Get You the Best DealGuaranteedwww.diamondconciergeservice.com/GI

    Dual Layer - QuillOrder Technology at Quill & Get Fast And Free Shipping, No Minimum!www.quill.com/Dual-Layer-DVD

    Diamond at HSN Find the Perfect Diamond Earrings & more Jewelry at HSN!www.hsn.com/

    Back to Store

    About eBay Community Announcements Security Center Policies Site Map eBay official time Preview new features Contact us Tell us what you think

    Copyright 1995-2013 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. User Agreement and Privacy Policy .

    Page 3 of 3Purple Blk Dual Layer Impact Diamond Studs Combo Case Cover for Nokia Lumia 928 | ...

    7/19/2013http://www.ebay.com/itm/PURPLE-BLK-DUAL-LAYER-IMPACT-DIAMOND-STUDS-...

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-5 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 4

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    31/51

    EXHIBIT D

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 2

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    32/51

    Home | Shop By Device | Pink Trim Triple Impact Hard Case For APPLE iPhone 5

    MY CART

    You have no items in your shopping cart.

    COMPARE PRODUCTS

    You have no items to compare.

    NEWSLETTER

    Newsletter Sign-up:

    Enter your email address

    PINK TRIM TRIPLE IMPACT HARD CASE FOR APPLE IPHONE 5

    Email to a Friend

    Be the first to review this product

    Availability: In stock

    $13.95

    Quick Overview

    Give your new phone the protection it deserves with this new heavy duty

    case! This case protects against scratches and scuffs, and allows you to add

    some style to your phone while still having total access to all buttons and

    controls.

    Add to Wishlist Add to Compare

    Qty: 1

    Double click on above image to view ful l picture

    MORE VIEWS

    PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

    The Triple Impact case offers slick looking protection for your phone. The case features 2 layers of protection. The main part of the

    case is made out of silicone gel that covers the entire phone. The 2nd layer is a hard plastic shell t hat covers the back and sides of

    the silicone gel as shown in the pictures. Your phone remains fully functional while in the case with access to all the phones

    features. If you need heavy duty protection look no further, protect your device with a Triple Impact case.

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

    PRODUCT TAGS

    Use spaces to separate tags. Use single quotes (') for phrases.

    Materials Polycarbonate And Silicone Combo

    Made For APPLE iPhone 5

    Add Your Tags:

    Submit

    Add to Cart

    Add Tags

    Page 1 of 1Pink Trim Triple Impact Hard Case For APPLE iPhone 5 - Shop By Device

    7/9/2013http://www.case-ology.com/shop-by-device/pink-trim-triple-impact-hard-case-for-apple-iph...

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 2

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    33/51

    EXHIBIT E

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 1 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    34/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 2 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    35/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 3 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    36/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 4 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    37/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 5 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    38/51

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    39/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 7 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    40/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 8 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    41/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 9 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    42/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 10 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    43/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 11 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    44/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 12 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    45/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 13 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    46/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 14 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    47/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 15 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    48/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 16 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    49/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 17 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    50/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 18 of 19

  • 7/28/2019 AG Findings v. Bodega - Complaint

    51/51

    Case 0:13-cv-61559-RSR Document 1-7 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2013 Page 19 of 19