agency and vendor benchmarks - wild apricot · agency and vendor benchmarks. government executive...
TRANSCRIPT
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
TRUMP EDITION
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
Government Executive Media Group and Govini proudly present The 2017 Federal Scorecard, the premier annual ranking of vendor and agency performance. This annual publication provides a big data view of the Federal market, with thousands of data points creating a broad picture of the complex and changing ecosystem of agencies and vendors.
We are in uncharted territory: 2017 is a year defined by unprecedented change and uncertainty. The Trump Administration is intent on reprioritizing government spending and collapsing the existing bureaucracy. The President’s ability to enact his agenda will be enabled by his unprecedented access to big data and analytics, including applications that were spearheaded, but ultimately unrealized, by the previous Obama and Bush Administrations.
Government Executive Media Group has tirelessly covered the issues and opportunities surrounding the Trump Agenda. Govini complements this rich editorial content and predicts emerging trends by taking an empirical, fact-based, data science approach to the market. Together, we look forward to continuing to provide unique insights and forecasts to you throughout this exciting year.
Sincerely,
Tim Hartman, CEO, Government Executive Media Group Eric Gillespie, CEO and Founder, Govini
Introduction
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
Table of Contents
Rank RankPagePage Section Section
1 67
64
10.4
3.4
2 70
65
65
83
5.2
2.9
4.0
80.63 71
68
4.7
5.4
4 66 6414.3 6.5
5
6
65
70
6772.4
3.1
3.8
7 70
68
14.6 8.467
3.3
8
10
66
66
72
4.4
3.7
3.1
9 65
68
8.1
2.7
66 6.0
11 63
61
8.4
2.2
1231
5 14
13
16
37
33
41
7 1539
9
174311
184513
15 1947
17 2049
2151
21
25
2253
23
2459
2357
29
Department of the Navy Department of the Treasury
Department of Transportation
General Services Administration
Department of Veterans Affairs
Department of Commerce
Environmental Protection Agency
Department of the Army Department of Agriculture
Department of the Interior
Department of State
Department of the Air Force
Defense-Wide
Defense Research Labs
Department of Energy
Agency for International Development
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Department of Education
Department of Health & Human Services
Department of Homeland Security
Department of Labor
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Department of Justice
Social Security Administration
Agency Contract Complexity
Agency Contract Complexity
Avg. Competitors per Contract Action
Avg. Competitors per Contract Action
3 Dynamic Radically Changes as New Administration and Agency Leadership Settle In 35 Tech Companies Prep for Trump’s Infrastructure Plan - Even Without Details
55 The 10 Largest Programs on Trump’s Chopping Block
Vendor Rankings Overview
Agency Analytics Overview1
2
Index61
27 Government Needs ‘Heavy Artillery’ for Cyberspace, DHS Chief Says
19 Is Trump’s Budget an Opportunity for Contractors?
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
1
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
SEAPORT - E
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
SEWP V
2604
582
67
$5.8 B
$301.6 M
$218.7 M
Navy FIP 2 $157.6 M
President Trump has signaled a turn towards prioritizing ships over aircraft. A growing demand for ships will benefit builders like General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls and Textron. Lockheed Martin may be challenged by the Administration with an expiring contract for the Joint Strike Fighter in the spotlight. Booz Allen Hamilton is the Navy’s most at-risk contractor from exposure to $600M in expiring SEAPORT-E task orders for mission readiness.
$159.3 B Budget Authority
$95.8 B Contract Spend
6.6%
8.8% 89.1 K Contracts
24.3 K Vendors
4.4%
1.3%
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
6.3%
3.1%
2.1%
1.1%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 21.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
Aircraft Jet Engines (2840)
Fixed Wing Aircraft (1510)
Aircraft Operational Systems Development R&D (AC15)
Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
Combat Ships & Landing Vessels (1905)Actual 17.4%
Agency Analytics Overview
Welcome to The 2017 Federal Scorecard, our annual ranking of vendor and agency performance in the Federal market. The Scorecard is designed to provide visibility into agency contract activity and relationships with prominent contractors. The top 24 agencies are ordered by the total dollar value of contract obligations and the health of their respective vendor ecosystems. Below is a breakout of the various analytics within the Scorecard that gauge agency performance.
Contracting Overview
Provides agency contract details at a glance and how they changed year-over-year. FY16 key highlights are noted.
Contract Spend: Dollar value of contract obligations.
Contracts: Count of distinct contracts with positive obligations.
Budget Authority: Dollar value of enacted discretionary budget authority.
Vendors: Count of distinct vendors with positive contract obligations for the year.
Product and Service Spend
Charts the agency’s FY16 spend on the top five products and services,
as well as growth in spend compared
to the previous three-year average. The methodology
demonstrates how FY16 spend deviates from the
average of FY13 - 15.
Set-Aside Performance
Compares agency small business goals to actual performance in FY16 and over a three-year period (FY14 - 16).
SB: Small Business
SDB: Small Disadvantaged Business
WOSB: Women-Owned Small Business
SDVOB: Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Business
HZ: HUBZone
Contract Vehicles
Shows the top four Indefinite Delivery
Vehicles (IDVs) used by agencies, transaction count and obligated dollars over a three-
year period (FY14 - 16).
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
2
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of Agency
MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
15 26
36
78 77 4.3 7.4
75 70 3.3 4.8
83 87 2.1 2.9
70
196
10
53
152
12$290.4 M
$806.5 M
$515.9 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
21 50
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
VSE Corp.
16
RankThe relative vendor
position based on total revenue captured and vendor performance.
Current and last FY ranks are displayed.
Share of Agency MarketThe delta between
a vendor’s FY15 and FY16 share of an agency’s total contract spend.
Vendor Revenue Captured
The dollar amount of contract obligations
captured.
Vendor Contract Actions
Count of distinct contract actions with positive obligations.
Vendor Contract Complexity
A measure of the overall sophistication of a contract won, on a scale from 1 to 100.
Competitors Per Contract Action
The average number of competitor bids placed per contract
awarded.
Vendor Rankings Overview
Govini creates a top-level view of the market from a set of proprietary benchmarks and analytics, all based on its database of record. As the Federal contracting landscape continues to evolve, it is increasingly important for contractors to leverage big data to inform strategic planning, business development, capture, teaming and partnering.
Vendor rankings are split into three sections: Significant Movers, calling out vendors that have seen transformative change in market or performance conditions; Notable Vendors, representing market leaders worth tracking; and Top Vendors, the top 10 performers by rank. Illustrated below are the benchmark metrics provided for each ranked vendor.
0.18%
0.44%
0.17%
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
3
Dynamic Radically Changes as New Administration and Agency Leadership Settle In
President Trump has argued that it is time to completely reimagine government and has telegraphed an agenda that impacts nearly every major Federal agency. The actions of President Trump in the early days of his presidency have largely aligned with his key campaign agenda points.
It is highly possible that over the next few years there will be a successive series of agency reorganizations and revisions announced supporting the Trump Agenda. Every change will prompt disruption and reaction by agency and industry alike. Participants in the Federal market can safely
assume their business environments will see dramatic shifts when compared to the previous administration.
71 percent of Scorecard agencies saw increased Contract Spend in FY16. Based on the roster of newly appointed secretaries, as well as President Trump’s Budget Blueprint for 2018, non-defense agencies should not expect budget increases in the foreseeable future.
Right: Agencies in the top-right quadrant are larger and have demonstrated a year-over-year increase in reprogramming potential. They are most able to underwrite President Trump’s spending priority changes. Agencies in the bottom-left quadrant are smaller and have demonstrated a year-over-year decrease in reprogramming potential. They are the least able to underwrite President Trump’s spending priority changes.
4
Change will not come easily. Conflicts between the White House and Congress will certainly arise over budgets and spending as the President pursues his agenda. Agencies themselves will have a varying degree of capacity to pivot toward new directives in 2017. Vendors will need to evaluate their public sector strategies as their agency clients adjust to new realities.
Opportunities for both vendors and agencies will also be present. For example, President Trump’s plan to build a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border is expected to cost tens of billions of dollars. In early March 2017, DHS said that it could find only $20 million for the project. Digging a little deeper, Govini’s analysis shows that the DHS is looking at $9.1 billion in 2017 expiring contracts (below). Granted, while not all of these contracts can be repurposed for construction, it does provide an avenue for the critical evaluation of funds becoming available for potential reallocation.
In fact, $406.9 billion in contracts are set to expire across the largest 19 Federal agencies in 2017. Agencies will begin to pinpoint contracts that need to be cut, renegotiated or restructured in the scramble to account for budget cuts. Vendors will be required to gain awareness of risk and begin to tailor their goods and services to the Administration’s priorities.
Understanding where and how procurement trends will play out provides big-data adopters with an indisputable advantage when mapping out their strategies. With so much at stake, a data-driven approach to understanding Federal spending will be critical for agencies, contractors, Congress and the Trump Administration itself.
In the following pages of The 2017 Federal Scorecard, Govini presents an overview to orient both seasoned contracting experts and new entrants to the Federal market. This overview provides insight into the
complex relationships between agencies and their vendors, including a summary of FY16 spending details, top product service categories, procurement methods, set-aside classifications and the top vendors ranked.
Left: Large agencies including Army, HHS, NASA, VA and State with missions that rely heavily on technical services and IT have greater potential for redirecting funds in 2017 than in 2016. Others such as Navy, Air Force and DOE that manage large multi-year programs have less flexibility.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
5
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
SEAPORT - E
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
SEWP V
2604
582
67
$5.4 B
$301.6 M
$218.7 M
Navy FIP 2 $157.6 M
President Trump has signaled a turn towards prioritizing ships over aircraft. A growing demand for ships will benefit builders like General Dynamics, Huntington Ingalls and Textron. Lockheed Martin may be challenged by the Administration with an expiring contract for the Joint Strike Fighter in the spotlight. Booz Allen Hamilton is the Navy’s most at-risk contractor from exposure to $600M in expiring SEAPORT-E task orders for mission readiness.
$159.3 B Budget Authority
$95.8 B Contract Spend
6.6%
8.8% 89.1 K Contracts
24.3 K Vendors
4.4%
1.3%
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
6.3%
3.1%
2.1%
1.1%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 21.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
Navy MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
15 26
36
0.18% 78 77 4.3 7.4
75 70 3.3 4.8
83 87 2.1 2.9
70
196
10
53
152
12
0.44%
0.17% $290.4 M
$806.5 M
$515.9 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
21 50
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
VSE Corp.
16
Aircraft Jet Engines (2840)
Fixed Wing Aircraft (1510)
Aircraft Operational Systems Development R&D (AC15)
Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
Combat Ships & Landing Vessels (1905)Actual 17.4%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
6
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
Navy MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
4
7
12
11
15
12
3.48%
1.10%
0.02%
0.20%
70
75
68
78
67
70
66
78
5.1
2.4
2.5
6.8
6.4
3.7
2.4
8.2
70
70
69
67
68
68
67
66
4.4
10.1
4.0
1.2
6.9
11.3
4.2
2.0
68
67
72
80
66
65
67
69
70
66
81
64
3.1
7.9
7.5
2.1
2.0
6.1
5.4
17.8
7.4
1.8
2.4
9.3
745
100
35
11
674
507
584
233
424
301
411
11
14
308
714
137
42
11
650
589
576
232
431
306
399
24
7
288
0.05%
0.71%
0.63%
0.05%
2.92%
0.84%
0.24%
0.16%
0.08%
0.01%
$7.0 B
$3.5 B
$2.4 B
$2.6 B
$874.8 M
$897.8 M
$8.7 B
$4.6 B
$4.2 B
$1.1 B
$14.7 B
$4.4 B
$2.2 B
$716.6 M
2
6
8
10
14
3
9
11
5
2018
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
Huntington Ingalls Inc. (HII)
Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office
DXC Technology Co. (DXC)
General Dynamics Corp. (GD)
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
Textron Inc. (TXT)
The Boeing Co. (BA)
United Technologies Corp. (UTX)
BAE Systems PLC (BAESY)
Bechtel Group Inc.
Austal USA Inc. (ASB)
General Electric Co. (GE)
Notable Vendors
Related Govini Market View: Navy FY16
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
7
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
Rapid Response 3rd Generation
Warfighter FOCUS
LOGCAP
1
1
13
$930.8 M
$926.8 M
$871.3 M
Army ITES 2S 1 $781.4 M
Army saw an increase to its FY16 spend compared to the year prior. Years of force reductions and budget pressure brought contract obligations down 50.1 percent from a high in FY10. Multi-year tactical vehicle and vertical lift procurements kicking-off will benefit OEMs including Oshkosh, AM General, Lockheed Martin, General Atomics and Boeing. The President will look to increase Army budget in its priority to revitalize defense initiatives.
$123.3 B Budget Authority
$76.0 B Contract Spend
2.7%
6.2% 74.1 K Contracts
29.2 K Vendors
6.3%
2.8%
15.8%
6.7%
5.7%
3.6%
Actual 31.3%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 24.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
Army MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
18 33
34
79 79 3.3 5.9
70 69 1.5 1.4
100 100 17.0 16.2
43
73
15
33
96
12$252.5 M
$572.6 M
$611.2 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
24 42
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Textron Inc. (TXT)
Torch Technologies Inc.
19
Professional Support (R499)
IT & Telecommunications (D399) Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
Rotary Wing Aircraft (1520)
Logistics Support (R706)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.44%
0.28%
0.05%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
8
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
Army MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3
2
6
13
17
9
13
73
70
73
72
72
72
70
74
1.7
4.2
6.7
3.1
1.7
3.0
5.6
3.0
70
74
80
70
71
74
76
71
3.0
1.8
2.9
13.2
4.3
2.0
3.1
9.6
70
72
77
77
68
70
68
71
76
72
65
72
1.5
2.6
1.9
1.7
2.9
4.8
1.5
3.3
4.4
1.4
3.0
1.1
245
325
164
76
194
309
62
207
142
315
54
42
183
33
241
291
184
66
208
290
37
197
140
321
61
57
232
30
$3.2 B
$2.8 B
$759.4 M
$1.3 B
$1.4 B
$448.8 M
$3.9 B
$3.2 B
$879.5 M
$1.3 B
$4.3 B
$3.8 B
$1.5 B
$777.3 M
11
4
10
15
15
5
1
11
7
1620
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
CACI International Inc. (CACI)
BAE Systems PLC (BAESY)
General Dynamics Corp. (GD)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
L3 Technologies Inc. (LLL)
The Boeing Co. (BA)
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
Orbital ATK Inc. (OA)
Oshkosh Corp. (OSK)
Harris Corp. (HRS)
General Atomics Inc.
Notable Vendors
1.17%
0.16%
0.80%
0.08%
3.08%
0.02%
0.06%
0.42%
1.54%
1.48%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.34%
Related Govini Market View: Army FY16
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
9
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
AF NETCENTS II
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
Alliant - IT Services
42
573
1
$844.8 M
$739.0 M
$611.5 M
OASIS Small Business 1 $570.4 M
Several of the Air Force’s top contractors such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman and United Launch Alliance have retained their Scorecard ranking. These vendors will likely see less disruption from the Trump Administration as many of the Air Force’s priorities tend to revolve around long-term, next-generation weapons platforms.
$145.7 B Budget Authority
$68.9 B Contract Spend
6.2%
21.8% 41.5 K Contracts
17.4 K Vendors
1.0%
1.3%
7.6%
3.1%
3.3%
1.1%
Actual 19.6%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 21.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
Air Force MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
19 27
55
61 61 1.0 1.0
71 65 2.9 5.4
73 71 2.2 2.4
2
56
13
2
49
16$270.1 M
$338.2 M
$322.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
23 40
Sallyport Global Holdings Inc.
Rolls-Royce Corp. (RR)
Hewlett-Packard Co. (HPQ)
22
Fixed Wing Aircraft (1510)Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
Professional Support (R499)
Aircraft Maintenance & Equipment (J015)
Space Launch (V126)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.16%
0.32%
0.21%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
10
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
Air Force MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
4
10
9
12
13
12
73
64
66
78
72
65
63
70
2.2
1.0
1.8
1.0
2.3
1.0
2.0
1.0
70
69
69
96
69
69
65
96
2.0
1.8
1.4
5.5
1.8
1.8
1.4
7.5
71
67
74
70
70
93
71
71
71
71
72
93
1.8
1.1
4.0
2.5
4.7
5.1
1.9
1.3
4.6
2.0
4.0
6.2
260
7
13
1
311
337
35
3
332
44
187
215
298
9
287
8
12
2
310
331
27
3
341
31
203
230
218
8
$4.2 B
$1.0 B
$1.2 B
$2.4 B
$1.7 B
$477.8 M
$11.5 B
$3.0 B
$935.9 M
$535.7 M
$12.1 B
$1.5 B
$975.1 M
$866.0 M
2
5
11
8
13
3
7
11
6
1614
The Boeing Co. (BA)
United Launch Alliance LLC
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
The Aerospace Corp.
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
Sierra Nevada Corp.
Patriot Team
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
General Atomics Inc.
United Technologies Corp. (UTX)
L3 Technologies Inc. (LLL)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Federal Express Corp. (FDX)
Notable Vendors
4.54%
0.92%
0.10%
0.25%
4.35%
1.58%
0.16%
0.22%
0.40%
0.79%
0.14%
0.97%
0.06%
0.14%
Related Govini Market View: Air Force FY16
DEFENSE - WIDEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
11
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
DLA TLSP
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
Tricare TPharm4
2
455
1
$1.2 B
$858.6 M
$799.4 M
DOD DS TAT 1 $676.3 M
Defense-Wide agencies cover non-military DoD functions including health, personnel, logistics and IT. Drugs & Biologicals and General Healthcare dominate the top spending PSC codes. Humana maintains its number one ranking among top health-related vendors which include Health Net, UnitedHealth Group, McKesson and Express Scripts.
$93.4 B Budget Authority
$65.1 B Contract Spend
2.9%
1.2% 495.5 K Contracts
18.9 K Vendors
17.3%
3.5%
8.8%
4.1%
3.4%
1.6%
Actual 23.0%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 21.6%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of DoD - Wide Market
Vendor Revenue Captured
VendorContract Actions
Vendor Contract Complexity
Competitors Per Contract Action
23 72
47
87 73 19.5 17.0
100 100 12.1 8.2
55 56 3.0 3.7
8
36
211
7
47
261$499.0 M
$270.7 M
$235.9 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
25 15
National Fuel Gas Co. (NFG)
SupplyCore Inc.
Cardinal Health Inc. (CAH)
24
General Healthcare (Q201)
Drugs & Biologicals (6505)
Professional Support (R499)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Liquid Propellants & Fuels (9130)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.18%
0.13%
0.63%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEFENSE - WIDE
12
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of DoD - Wide Market
Vendor Revenue Captured
VendorContract Actions
Vendor Contract Complexity
Competitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
2
10
18
16
29
17
84
77
63
72
89
67
60
72
2.0
2.1
1.7
4.6
2.0
2.1
1.6
4.7
72
72
67
68
80
73
64
64
2.0
4.9
3.9
2.4
2.0
4.2
4.8
2.5
60
91
75
52
83
55
52
91
74
54
81
52
3.3
2.3
2.1
4.0
33.8
8.5
3.0
3.2
2.3
4.4
24.3
9.5
3
4
388
106
3
395
596
560
13
2
19
354
8
791
1
4
387
84
3
198
594
534
15
2
14
464
8
666
$2.7 B
$789.3 M
$467.1 M
$2.1 B
$537.4 M
$1.1 B
$2.7 B
$2.9 B
$2.2 B
$1.0 B
$3.6 B
$2.7 B
$1.9 B
$523.9 M
3
5
13
7
20
4
12
13
8
2322
Humana Inc. (HUM)
Health Net Inc. (HNT)
The Boeing Co. (BA)
CACI International Inc. (CACI)
UnitedHealth Group Inc. (UNH)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
McKesson Corp. (MCK)
Express Scripts Inc. (ESRX)
Alion Science & Technology Corp. (ALON)
AmerisourceBergen Corp. (ABC)
Shell Oil Co. (RDS)
ADS Tactical Inc.
Notable Vendors
0.04%
0.37%
0.57%
0.02%
0.25%
1.38%
0.62%
0.25%
0.80%
0.36%
0.04%
0.34%
0.54%
0.11%
DEFENSE RESEARCH LABSAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
13
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
SEAPORT - E
OASIS Small Business
ALLSB - Alliant Small Business
43
1
2
$103.8 M
$69.9 M
$43.8 M
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT 84 $33.6 M
Defense Research Labs saw a sharp increase in contract obligations while experiencing a decrease in the volume of both contracts and vendors compared to the previous year. Electronics & Communication Equipment R&D emerged in this year’s top five PSC codes with the highest FY16 growth. This growth was driven by contracts coming from the Air Force Research Laboratory.
$46.0 B Budget Authority
$3.6 B Contract Spend
1.1%
11.0% 6.7 K Contracts
2.8 K Vendors
7.9%
7.3%
9.3%
4.2%
3.1%
1.3%
Actual 23.6%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 21%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DRL MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
19 39
41
71 68 35.5 74.8
76 74 8.5 13.0
68 68 15.3 10.5
15
14
2
20
12
2$21.0 M
$24.1 M
$24.6 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
25
Oceus Networks Inc.
Sotera Defense Solutions Inc.
MacDonald Dettwiler & Associates LTD (MDA)
22
Electronics & Communications Equipment R&D (AC62)
Exploratory Defense R&D (AD92)
Advanced Defense Development (AD93)
Professional Support (R499)
Advanced Science & Technology Engineering (AJ43)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.08%
0.12%
0.53%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEFENSE RESEARCH LABS
14
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DRL MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
11
9
30
10
12
12
69
59
75
81
70
58
75
77
120.3
1.0
6.2
1.4
134.1
1.0
1.8
1.3
65
71
66
66
64
68
66
68
98.4
7.8
1.7
97.9
111.5
15.7
1.5
134.1
71
68
86
65
69
80
70
67
87
63
69
75
65.6
135.1
2.0
37.5
7.0
2.6
45.3
116.1
1.8
18.1
7.0
2.5
71
3
20
10
124
59
6
71
71
73
8
24
1
9
78
2
20
8
145
63
3
73
79
84
9
9
1
12
$223.5 M
$117.9 M
$42.0 M
$96.9 M
$43.6 M
$31.5 M
$226.7 M
$124.6 M
$64.5 M
$57.4 M
$242.7 M
$128.8 M
$71.3 M
$33.9 M
3
8
21
37
13
2
4
11
29
1814
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
CNA Financial Corp. (CNA)
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. (BAH)
Praxis Inc.
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
Harris Corp. (HRS)
Technology Service Corp.
SRI International
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
BAE Systems PLC (BAESY)
Assurance Technology Corp.
Aurora Flight Sciences Corp.
Agile Defense Inc.
Strategic Analysis Inc.
Notable Vendors
0.49%
2.44%
0.57%
0.30%
0.85%
1.20%
1.05%
0.06%
1.16%
0.29%
0.10%
2.03%
0.62%
0.03%
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
15
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
ALLSB - Alliant Small Business
874 - MOBIS
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
5
39
122
$196.9 M
$134.7 M
$111.9 M
00CORP - The Consolidated Schedule 6 $56.4 M
DOE manages a network of labs critical in developing nuclear arms and technologies for other agencies, notably the Intelligence Community, DoD and DHS. Priorities under the Trump Administration will be reversing clean energy initiatives, stalling advancements in climate change and investing in nuclear weapons capabilities. A large portion of DOE spend goes toward managing government facilities and research & development.
$29.6 B Budget Authority
$26.5 B Contract Spend
8.2%
14.8% 3.9 K Contracts
2.4 K Vendors
4.3%
2.2%
2.9%
1.2%
0.7%
0.2%
Actual 5.4%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 6.4%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOE MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
19 16
25
65 83 4.3 2.1
74 68 2.4 2.7
67 67 4.0 4.0
11
3
1
5
4
1$274.0 M
$336.7 M
$607.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
23 66
Honeywell International Inc. (HON)
Fluor Corp. (FLR)
Mission Support Alliance LLC
22
Operation of Miscellaneous Buildings (M1JZ)
Real Property Restoration Operations (M300)
Technology/Science R&D (AJ31)
Basic R&D (AZ11)
Operations of Government R&D Facilities (M181)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.02%
0.02%
0.97%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
16
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOE MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
3
9
13
11
12
12
73
76
65
81
73
85
78
77
1.3
2.1
0.8
3.7
1.9
1.5
1.0
3.4
95
74
79
75
95
74
79
76
3.0
2.8
2.0
2.1
3.0
2.2
2.0
2.3
78
68
78
90
68
77
69
68
78
90
68
71
2.4
3.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
3.0
2.5
3.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
2.9
2
3
5
11
1
11
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
12
1
10
1
5
4
1
1
1
1
2
$1.9 B
$1.4 B
$719.2 M
$1.4 B
$744.0 M
$455.6 M
$2.0 B
$2.2 B
$891.8 M
$626.9 M
$2.3 B
$1.9 B
$1.7 B
$808.4 M
2
5
8
10
13
4
6
11
7
1817
Los Alamos National Security LLC
Battelle Memorial Institute Inc.
The Regents of the University of California
AECOM Inc. (ACM)
Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Savannah River Nuclear Solutions LLC
CH2M HILL Companies LTD
Bechtel Group Inc.
Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC
URS-FNI-HZ Team
UT-Battelle LLC
UChicago Argonne LLC
National Security Technologies LLC
Notable Vendors
0.13%
0.02%
2.89%
0.55%
0.48%
0.08%
0.24%
0.82%
0.41%
0.61%
0.23%
0.08%
0.17%
0.22%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Energy FY16
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
17
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
VA PPV
T4
65 II A - Medical Equipment and Supplies
1
2
748
$5.5 B
$1.2 B
$505.6 M
SEWP V 202 $453.7 M
Under the Obama Administration the VA’s contract obligations had increased 46.6 percent from FY08 to FY16, with much of it going into digital transformation, mobility and IT modernization. The Trump Administration will closely examine IT systems, operational processes and professional services for managing care. The VA will likely have the contracting flexibility to support changes coming from the Administration in 2017.
$71.6 B Budget Authority
$23.1 B Contract Spend
9.9%
16.1% 85.0 K Contracts
19.3 K Vendors
3.3%
1.5%
7.1%
3.0%
17.8%
1.6%
Actual 29.9%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 32.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
VA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
14 4
7
88 80 10.5 12.1
67 81 2.5 2.9
95 96 14.3 23.0
5
15
3
4
6
1$75.1 M
$139.4 M
$124.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
20 15
Accenture PLC (ACN)
MicroTech LLC
Longview International Technology Solutions Inc.
18
Other Medical (Q999)
Drugs & Biologicals (6505)Medical Instruments (6515)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Medical Imaging Equipment (6525)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.46%
0.32%
0.02%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
18
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
VA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
14
12
81
87
100
90
81
89
96
88
1.8
1.9
4.4
10.3
1.6
34.3
2.3
11.6
100
88
91
83
100
91
77
80
2.3
6.0
8.6
2.7
2.9
9.2
8.2
6.7
86
84
90
58
80
77
86
84
86
59
63
67
17.2
9.5
8.8
7.9
11.5
1.3
20.5
16.0
8.2
11.2
8.8
1.8
1
5
2
10
5
6
3
5
9
10
4
416
6
7
1
7
1
5
3
5
7
4
10
9
3
281
9
13
$498.9 M
$254.3 M
$154.8 M
$5.5 B
$158.8 M
$83.9 M
$602.5 M
$204.5 M
$156.6 M
$109.4 M
$1.2 B
$458.9 M
$174.9 M
$166.7 M
2
6
10
8
17
1
5
11
3
6922
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.
Health Net Inc. (HNT)
Genco Distribution System Inc.
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Kiewit-Turner JV
DaVita Inc. (DVA)
Phonak Inc.
Valador Inc.
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. (BAH)
By Light Professional IT Services Inc.
McKesson Corp. (MCK)
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. (FMS)
Iron Bow Technologies
Notable Vendors
5.64%
2.17%
0.75%
0.18%
1.49%
0.11%
0.05%
0.47%
0.62%
0.04%
0.29%
5.99%
0.17%
0.20%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Veterans Affairs FY16
Is Trump’s Budget an Opportunity for Contractors?
19
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRSAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
used to fortify its internal IT to support the 2020 Census.
But despite scarce details or dollar amounts in the blueprint, contractors might see an opportunity to start selling their technology as a service directly to government, Govini analyst Matt Hummer told Nextgov.
President Donald Trump’s administration has prioritized reducing the federal workforce and government spending by cracking down on duplicative programs, Hummer explained, which is a “natural progression to outsource [technology services]” instead of buying the components separately and relying
By Mohana Ravindranath, Nextgov
The White House revealed its $1.1 trillion skinny budget in March 2017, slashing funding for many federal technology research and grant programs, including the Energy Department’s R&D unit, the Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy.
It’s less clear how the administration plans to address the federal government’s internal information technology challenges. In the last Congress, lawmakers proposed legislation that would create working capital funds at agencies for IT modernization programs, but the White House’s budget blueprint is light on details about IT spending.
It mentions information technology just a handful of times: pledging to build up the Veterans Affairs Department’s IT system to “improve the efficiency and efficacy” of its services; committing to “strategically enhance” the Treasury Department’s security systems and “preempt fragmentation” of its IT management to prevent cyberattack; and allotting an additional $100 million to the Census Bureau, some of which would be
Right: VA vendors at risk include systems integrators, enterprise IT, value-added resellers and professional services providers. Competition is most fierce among integrators and enterprise IT and less so among resellers. Managing the ecosystem of IT solution providers is critical to improved services.
20
on an agency’s internal workforce, or a systems integrator, to set up the system.
“What we’re talking about is a massive transition in the way things are bought and provided,” he said; systems integrators could soon lose out to companies who provide their technology as a service.
The White House’s fiscal 2017 budget requests $11 million for a real-time data analytics program to help crunch information that would be used for immigration enforcement; though also light on specifics, the inclusion of that program in the request suggests that the Administration may be interested in the analytics-as-a-service model, Hummer said. Broadly, the budget demonstrates “emphasis on collecting information and using that information to organize resources.”
Tech contractors may not be so optimistic. “We are particularly concerned about arbitrary and disproportionate reductions in some agencies,” Professional Services Council President and Chief Executive Officer Dave Berteau said in a statement. But contractors can “help bridge that gap” when “cuts ... do not align with the vital missions and functions of those agencies.”
Steep budget cuts “may make IT acquisition a challenge,” Elizabeth Hyman, Executive Vice President for Public Advocacy at CompTIA, told Nextgov in a statement. “But some might choose to see this as a moment of opportunity—where smart acquisitions to modernize IT systems can make agency missions more efficient.”
Left: M&A activity is creating a size and scale play for the bow wave of Cloud spending. Mid-tier integrators like Harris Corporation, that have a mix of high-end engineering and low-end hardware and software services, are jettisoning their IT Services business due to a lack of growth. Others will soon follow.
DXC Technologies became the market leader as the combined entity of CSC and Hewlett-Packard’s services business. Leidos became the second largest after its acquisition of Lockheed Martin’s Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS). Harris Corporation moves down three spots after its divestiture of Harris IT Services to Veritas Capital, while others including Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics and CGI Federal could be next to sell their IT Services business.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
21
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
874 - MOBIS
CMS VDC
490
119
1
$997.4 M
$593.5 M
$550.1 M
NIH CIO-SP3 1 $536.1 M
The effort to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act has brought HHS into the national spotlight. Ramping up the ACA over the past several years has driven considerable spend towards Professional Support and IT Services. In fact, 60.7% of expiring HHS contracts in 2017 can be allocated into these two categories. It is these very same expiring contracts that may provide the Trump Administration with the capability to reshape the department.
$85.0 B Budget Authority
$22.8 B Contract Spend
1.9%
5.1% 33.4 K Contracts
11.1 K Vendors
5.1%
0.8%
10.9%
7.3%
1.6%
1.0%
Actual 23.0%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 22.8%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
HHS MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
11 21
81
76 76 1.6 2.4
83 78 23.4 4.3
85 85 5.6 8.2
6
3
5
6
2
5$108.0 M
$121.0 M
$246.7 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
24 45
Palmetto GBA LLC
Ventech Solutions Inc.
Medical Science & Computing LLC
20
Drugs & Biologicals (6505)
Professional Support (R499)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Government Health Insurance Programs (G007)
Biomedical R&D (AN11)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.41%
0.39%
0.14%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
22
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
HHS MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
6
9
17
8
14
13
77
73
85
70
82
64
79
70
3.4
9.1
5.6
7.3
3.7
7.3
4.5
4.5
68
95
72
83
77
92
74
85
3.1
3.0
2.7
2.0
2.4
2.8
2.6
3.3
75
85
76
73
66
92
76
85
76
73
66
92
6.2
11.9
10.0
8.1
5.0
4.1
6.1
21.9
3.3
5.7
3.4
4.8
9
9
10
31
21
3
33
3
23
2
2
49
41
4
7
13
13
35
12
4
27
2
22
2
2
52
29
4
$897.9 M
$251.1 M
$202.7 M
$989.6 M
$813.7 M
$158.7 M
$1.5 B
$258.3 M
$766.2 M
$179.4 M
$1.1 B
$380.3 M
$348.1 M
$398.1 M
1
10
4
7
14
3
12
12
5
2219
Pfizer Inc. (PFE)
DXC Technology Co. (DXC)
National Government Services Inc.
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Merck & Co. Inc. (MRK)
Highmark Inc.
Sanofi Pasteur (SNY)
Emergent BioSolutions Inc. (EBS)
General Dynamics Corp. (GD)
Serco Inc. (SRP)
Kelly Services Inc. (KELYB)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK)
CGS Administrators LLC
Notable Vendors
0.65%
0.06%
0.11%
0.15%
0.09%
0.08%
0.32%
0.15%
0.18%
0.21%
0.12%
0.12%
0.70%
0.13%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Health and Human Services FY16
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksNATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
23
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
NASA GSMO
SEWP V
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
1
25
107
$100.3 M
$55.3 M
$36.0 M
874 - MOBIS 39 $31.4 M
NASA plays a vital role in advancing technology for space exploration and the aerospace and defense industries. This will compel the Trump Administration to make NASA a critical part of its strategy in developing capabilities that provide an asymmetric military advantage over potential adversaries such as Russia and China. The Trump Administration is also highly interested in commercial spaceflight and executing a manned Mars mission by 2033.
$19.3 B Budget Authority
$17.3 B Contract Spend
7.1%
9.5% 15.7 K Contracts
4.8 K Vendors
6.2%
1.9%
8.2%
4.1%
0.9%
0.5%
Actual 16.7%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 16.8%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
NASA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
11 95 95 6.0 6.0
52 52 7.0 7.0
88 88 9.0 5.0
1
1
1
1
1
1$61.3 M
$80.3 M
$143.0 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
25
Syncom Space Services LLC
ATA Aerospace LLC
Aerie Aerospace LLC
19
Space Launch (V126)
Applied Research & Exploratory Development (AR22)
Space & Aeronautics Technology Research (AR11)
Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
Space Flight R&D (AR33)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.82%
0.43%
0.33%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksNATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
24
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
NASA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
8
4
12
16
15
15
90
75
68
61
88
70
68
71
3.7
4.9
1.0
5.0
3.4
4.4
1.0
3.8
64
71
76
69
66
70
78
63
4.8
9.9
5.1
8.2
3.7
15.2
6.5
10.9
65
48
70
81
76
77
59
51
66
77
76
73
10.7
2.3
2.6
4.6
7.6
3.3
8.0
2.9
2.2
4.7
8.3
3.3
5
33
1
6
75
5
13
36
43
108
14
15
28
10
4
33
1
2
78
4
16
37
55
94
21
21
24
10
$1.2 B
$2.1 B
$222.8 M
$563.0 M
$350.3 M
$157.1 M
$2.1 B
$379.8 M
$320.2 M
$318.8 M
$957.8 M
$1.0 B
$235.8 M
$146.5 M
1
6
9
11
16
7
5
13
3
1417
SpaceX
Orbital ATK Inc. (OA)
Russia Space Agency
QinetiQ Group PLC (QQ)
The Boeing Co. (BA)
United Launch Alliance LLC
Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Inc.
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
California Institute of Technology
Harris Corp. (HRS)
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (JEC)
Arctic Slope Regional Corp.
Wyle Inc.
Notable Vendors
1.43%
1.06%
1.56%
0.00%
0.33%
0.21%
0.91%
0.27%
0.23%
0.59%
0.17%
1.04%
0.17%
0.14%
Related Govini Market View: National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY16
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
25
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
EAGLE II
EAGLE II Small Business
874 - MOBIS
32
52
119
$446.5 M
$403.0 M
$388.6 M
FirstSource II 17 $380.1 M
DHS presents an opportunity for immediate reform by the Trump Administration. Part of the reason is that a large share of the agency’s spending comes from contracts set to expire in 2017, giving it the flexibility to reshape partnerships with industry. This will be important as President Trump pursues his agenda item to secure the U.S. border, where DHS will need to strike a balance between investing in infrastructure, technologies and people.
$49.2 B Budget Authority
$14.3 B Contract Spend
5.2%
1.5% 35.4 K Contracts
15.2 K Vendors
16.5%
21.8%
15.6%
7.7%
6.0%
4.2%
Actual 36.9%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 33.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DHS MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
18 2
52
69 63 1.0 1.1
84 84 12.3 12.6
82 82 3.7 4.6
7
2
3
6
2
3$65.6 M
$67.1 M
$91.9 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
22 42
Huntington Ingalls Inc. (HII)
Knowledge Consulting Group Inc.
Knight Point Systems LLC
19
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Guard/Housekeeping (S206)
Program Management (R408)
Computer Software (7030)
Professional Support (R499)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
3.11%
0.23%
0.15%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
26
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DHS MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
7
35
9
15
10
13
75
67
55
96
69
67
57
82
1.2
2.0
3.0
6.3
1.6
2.0
4.4
3.9
71
72
73
73
66
71
77
62
15.2
9.6
1.7
2.6
3.4
7.8
1.7
3.1
77
93
77
52
81
95
76
92
78
52
73
92
2.4
14.6
3.6
8.0
3.8
8.7
3.5
13.5
3.7
8.0
3.8
8.8
3
3
35
2
11
8
16
26
35
30
57
1
8
10
6
3
15
2
14
6
14
22
35
29
61
1
8
10
$499.9 M
$349.7 M
$504.1 M
$110.3 M
$136.1 M
$100.7 M
$270.5 M
$186.4 M
$199.0 M
$266.6 M
$180.7 M
$139.5 M
$364.7 M
$90.6 M
6
5
8
14
3
12
12
2020
Mythics Inc.
Defense Support Services LLC
Bollinger Shipyards Inc.
Covenant Aviation Security LLC
Unisys Corp. (UIS)
Hanford Mission Support Co. LLC
The Geo Group Inc. (GEO)
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Tri-S Security Corp. (TRIS)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Eastern Shipbuilding Group Inc.
DXC Technology Co. (DXC)
Akal Security Inc.
Notable Vendors
0.04%
0.00%
1.91%
0.16%
0.36%
1.17%
0.29%
0.00%
1.42%
0.41%
0.47%
0.77%
0.29%
0.02%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Homeland Security FY16
Government Needs ‘Heavy Artillery’ for Cyberspace, DHS Chief Says
27
By Joseph Marks, Nextgov
The government must upgrade the digital weapons it uses to defend federal networks from nation-state and criminal hackers, Homeland Security Secretary Gen. John Kelly said in April.
Kelly cited “nation-state actors with extremely sophisticated tools,” “lone wolves” and “cyber terrorists that simply buy malware on the internet” as top cyber adversaries during his first major speech as secretary at George Washington University’s Center for Cyber and Homeland Security.
Government risks being outgunned in cyberspace because of the “plodding pace of bureaucracy,” Kelly warned during prepared remarks, though he skipped over that section in his formal address.
Allowing digital defenses to develop at government pace is akin to “sending troops to take Fallujah armed with muskets and powdered wigs,” Kelly warned in those remarks, adding that “our federal cybersecurity needs heavy artillery.”
Kelly warned during the speech itself that cop-proof encryption systems are making it much easier for terrorists to recruit and plan operations.
“These individuals are becoming harder and harder and, I predict, eventually impossible to detect,” he said.
Kelly said he has no update about a long-delayed executive order on
cybersecurity the Trump administration floated during its first weeks in office but then abruptly pulled.
“I’m standing by with bated breath. I can’t wait,” Kelly said.
The secretary also talked up cybersecurity cooperation between government and industry, touting President Donald Trump’s outreach to the private sector. Kelly himself recently discussed cybersecurity with leaders at Microsoft, he said.
“It’s something that certainly President Trump has taken on and is organized and is very, very involved in outreaching,” he said. “The government, god knows, can’t do it by itself.”
Cybersecurity was one of three main prongs of Kelly’s remarks, which also covered the threats of terrorism and of criminal drug gangs.
Several times during his speech, Kelly lashed out at critics of the department, especially lawmakers who have suggested the Trump administration is not sufficiently protecting the civil liberties of people detained at airports or land borders or unfairly targeting Muslims and other minorities.
“If lawmakers do not like the laws they’ve passed and we are charged to enforce—then they should have the courage and skill to change the laws,” he said. “Otherwise, they should shut up and support the men and women on the front lines.”
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
28
Kelly predicted the notoriously low morale at DHS will rebound because of the Trump administration’s more aggressive posture.
“My people have been discouraged from doing their jobs for nearly a decade, disabled by pointless bureaucracy and political meddling,
and suffered disrespect and contempt by public officials who have no idea what it means to serve,” he said, adding that “the best way to improve morale is to let employees do the jobs they were hired and trained to do, and recognize them for doing it.”
Above: CBP and ICE budget accounts fund some of the largest competitive contracts set to expire in 2017. OPO is also a critical funding source for Cybersecurity. USCG, TSA and NPPD are worthy of focus for vendors that sell via popular contract vehicles.
DEPARTMENT OF STATEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
29
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
8(a) STARS II
Alliant - IT Services
228
1
1
$253.6 M
$229.1 M
$221.5 M
SEWP V 29 $120.1 M
The Department of State’s high contract turnover, particularly in Professional Services and IT, makes this agency a powerful asset for transitioning toward the Trump Administration’s foreign policy agenda. Physical security contractors, system integrators, enterprise IT service providers, integrated logistics firms and general professional service firms are among the DOS’ most at risk for having their contracts reprogrammed in 2017.
$20.8 B Budget Authority
$9.0 B Contract Spend
0.4%
4.3% 50.2 K Contracts
6.6 K Vendors
3.3%
0.8%
14.8%
6.2%
5.4%
2.4%
Actual 28.6%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 22.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOS MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
16 69
24
71 71 3.0 1.4
70 70 2.1 2.1
78 78 1.0 1.0
3
5
2
3
6
3$52.2 M
$66.9 M
$60.7 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
19 42
Mythics Inc.
Buchanan & Edwards Inc.
GPC Consolidated Reporting
17
Office BuildingConstruction (Y1AA)
Program Management (R408)
Guard/Housekeeping (S206)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Logistics Support (R706)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.49%
0.08%
0.26%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF STATE
30
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOS MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
70
6
13
7
9
12
76
63
65
74
74
62
66
85
2.6
3.5
4.0
1.1
3.1
3.3
4.1
1.2
80
77
73
79
73
78
96
76
1.6
1.7
7.3
2.5
2.1
2.3
7.9
2.5
77
74
78
93
96
83
57
79
64
93
96
81
7.6
3.1
2.8
3.1
5.0
2.1
7.8
3.0
2.0
3.1
6.8
1.8
14
7
48
1
4
14
2
8
2
9
8
3
2
7
11
11
37
2
5
14
1
6
1
4
10
3
1
6
$211.1 M
$243.0 M
$178.8 M
$199.7 M
$138.0 M
$83.4 M
$456.5 M
$367.0 M
$169.5 M
$169.7 M
$585.1 M
$283.9 M
$605.6 M
$101.9 M
1
3
12
11
13
4
10
11
8
2315
Caddell Construction Co.
In-Tec Construction Co.
PAE Inc.
Accenture PLC (ACN)
CGI Federal Inc. (GIB)
DynCorp International Inc.
International Development Solutions LLC
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Aegis Defense Services LLC
Triple Canopy Inc.
General Dynamics Corp. (GD)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
Day & Zimmerman Group Inc.
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Notable Vendors
6.21%
3.16%
0.08%
0.06%
1.66%
0.58%
0.23%
0.78%
0.39%
0.18%
0.98%
0.40%
0.14%
0.17%
Related Govini Market View: Department of State FY16
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
31
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
DOE ESPC
874 - MOBIS
360
5
50
$473.3 M
$269.9 M
$236.0 M
SEWP V 56 $177.1 M
DOJ has been in the midst of modernizing legacy enterprise IT and building entirely new data systems. Nearly 85 percent of the value of contracts set to expire in 2017 comes from IT and Professional Services. This percentage has been steadily increasing since 2014. DOJ is finding that Big Data serves its law enforcement mission well and President Trump is unlikely to refute this.
$28.7 B Budget Authority
$7.1 B Contract Spend
9.2%
5.8% 48.8 K Contracts
12.7 K Vendors
8.2%
0.8%
12.1%
6.1%
3.7%
1.1%
Actual 31.6%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 30.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOJ MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
13 38 64 61 2.7 2,6
71 66 1.4 1.3
66 62 3.0 2.3
7
19
29
11
31
37$79.1 M
$69.5 M
$61.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
22 43
Sotera Defense Solutions Inc.
Siemens Corp. (SIE)
NANA Regional Corp.
17
Professional Support (R499)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
General Healthcare (Q201)
Other Management Support Services (R799)
Social Rehabilitation (G004)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.47%
0.96%
0.36%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
32
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOJ MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
7
9
8
30
15
68
67
60
63
67
94
55
57
2.1
13.3
1.0
1.4
1.8
1.0
1.0
1.3
48
69
74
55
52
70
70
58
5.1
3.1
3.5
1.5
5.1
3.1
3.1
2.2
78
71
66
61
76
67
76
63
60
63
79
65
3.5
3.7
3.3
2.9
2.7
7.1
2.2
3.5
3.4
1.8
2.8
6.0
13
1
5
13
14
15
2
21
20
6
27
21
15
7
14
1
4
17
25
16
3
35
21
7
34
25
12
10
$174.8 M
$77.4 M
$112.2 M
$120.8 M
$88.6 M
$42.8 M
$129.0 M
$128.0 M
$63.9 M
$68.8 M
$205.1 M
$82.0 M
$70.4 M
$65.3 M
12
5
10
6
19
3
28
12
1621
CoreCivic Inc. (CXW)
Ameresco Inc. (AMRC)
Rolling Bay LLC
World Wide Technology Inc.
Forfeiture Support Associates LLC
CACI International Inc. (CACI)
CGI Federal Inc. (GIB)
PCMG Inc.
The Geo Group Inc. (GEO)
Accenture PLC (ACN)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
United Technologies Corp. (UTX)
Deloitte Consulting LLP
ManTech International Corp. (MANT)
Notable Vendors
3.54%
1.16%
0.15%
0.25%
0.46%
0.36%
0.13%
0.07%
3.11%
0.67%
0.28%
1.63%
0.66%
0.12%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Justice FY16
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
FAA eFast
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
874 - MOBIS
130
149
40
$391.2 M
$62.8 M
$52.8 M
8(a) STARS II 1 $27.2 M
A key pillar in President Trump’s campaign platform was increased infrastructure spending and the jobs that would follow along with it. Should a large infrastructure spending bill pass, expect architecture, engineering and construction firms to directly benefit. DOT planning consultants, infrastructure financiers and providers of connected infrastructure will also see work come their way.
$14.3 B Budget Authority
$6.3 B Contract Spend
20.1%
8.4% 7.9 K Contracts
4.4 K Vendors
19.2%
17.1%
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
21.9%
10.7%
3.1%
11.1%
Actual 52.0%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 49.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOT MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
15 10
24
61 66 3.1 3.1
66 66 9.5 3.7
61 57 3.0 3.0
18
2
1
17
2
3$33.8 M
$41.6 M
$118.6 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
22 12
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
LS Technologies LLC
Robinson Aviation Inc.
19
33
Road, Bridge & Rail Construction (Y1LB)
Technical Engineering &Professional Support (R425)
Radio/Television Equipment (5820)
Management Support/Services R&D (AD26)
Program Management (R408)
0.06%
0.19%
0.30%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOT MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
4
7
9
16
13
12
75
72
79
56
75
72
68
61
2.6
2.9
2.7
3.0
2.8
2.9
2.6
3.0
59
60
83
72
61
61
80
73
2.6
2.6
2.8
5.6
2.8
2.8
3.2
5.7
71
57
58
62
55
95
64
58
59
61
52
95
1.3
3.0
4.3
2.3
3.0
3.2
1.1
3.0
2.9
2.8
3.0
4.5
29
2
4
3
19
16
11
6
3
5
5
6
2
2
30
2
4
2
13
19
8
6
3
8
4
6
2
2
$144.8 M
$79.3 M
$61.7 M
$91.5 M
$59.5 M
$35.7 M
$512.6 M
$250.1 M
$113.4 M
$55.2 M
$733.9M
$138.4 M
$77.1 M
$59.1 M
2
5
8
17
3
14
11
6
2521
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Parsons Corp.
Noblis Inc.
Human Solutions Inc.
Harris Corp. (HRS)
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
ActioNet Inc.
The MITRE Corp.
Midwest Air Traffic Control Service Inc.
Chickasaw Nation Industries Inc.
Engility Corp. (EGL)
The Walsh Group LTD
Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Inc.
Notable Vendors
34
1.02%
0.28%
0.24%
0.07%
0.03%
1.44%
0.11%
0.13%
0.27%
0.22%
0.22%
0.46%
0.91%
0.12%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Transportation FY16
Tech Companies Prep for Trump’s Infrastructure Plan - Even Without Details
35
By Mohana Ravindranath, Nextgov
For the past few years, French entrepreneur Fabrice Brassart has been building what he thinks will be the backbone of the city of the future: a network of app-summoned self-driving cars that seamlessly navigate roads on a rubber pad lined with radio frequency identification tags.
It’s an ambitious project that’s still in the conceptual stage, at least a year from pilot deployment and four years from commercialization. Brassart is still raising funds in Europe for his Nice-based startup, REVA2, and already aims to use French cities Cagnes-sur-Mer and Rennes as testbeds—they have already expressed interest, he said. But he’s found a reason to pursue entering the American market as well: President Donald Trump’s campaign promise for a $1 trillion infrastructure spending plan, meted out over 10 years.
“We will harness technology and make smarter decisions on how we build and utilize our infrastructure,” Trump’s transition team wrote in a brief description of his plans. “Our roads, bridges, airports, transit systems and ports will be the envy of the world and enhance the lives of all Americans.”
But details are sparse; it could potentially be fueled a combination of public and private dollars and a system of tax credits. By some estimates, the massive investment in infrastructure could create millions of jobs. Senate Democrats have proffered their own $1 trillion plan, which consists largely of federal investment in areas including roads and bridges, water and sewers, and broadband.
Despite uncertainty about what the spending bill could look like, executives at some tech companies—including at REVA2—view the discussions as signals that American infrastructure could soon get an upgrade. For some companies, especially those focused on creating modern cities that are networks of self-driving cars, sensors embedded in traffic lights, and smart trash cans that never overflow, it may be an opportunity for tech companies to rebrand their offerings as infrastructure-related.
Brassart told Nextgov he “won’t wait” to start investigating how the French company could enter the American market, even though the plan hasn’t taken shape. “I just cannot afford it.” Though he expects to have a pilot by 2018, in anticipation of potential future contracts, he has started to contact connections in Washington to facilitate an expansion into the U.S. market.
It’s not just the startups. Blue chip tech companies including IBM are taking note of Trump’s plans. In an open letter to Trump first reported by CNBC, Chief Executive Officer Ginni Rometty—one of his business policy advisers—urged the newly elected president to “focus on infrastructure investments that incorporate Internet of Things (IoT) technology and artificial intelligence to improve performance,” which might include higher tech buildings and public facilities. Rometty also warned that smarter infrastructure increases cybersecurity concerns.
Cisco, an established federal contractor, may also reposition itself as a high-tech infrastructure company, Mark Sanders, the company’s Director of Client & Market Development, told Nextgov.
In the past three years, the company has entered a handful of “sub-verticals” that could find a place in future cities, including water meters that, when coupled with sensors, allow people to monitor their water consumption remotely.
“We have done some select hiring to bring on expertise in transportation, specifically because we recognize that the country’s infrastructure is due for a major investment,” he said. Over the past few months, the company has also brought on civil engineers to help go after potential contracts. “Building our brand is critically important, because today many people think of Cisco as the networking company. Not necessarily do they think of them as the transportation company.”
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
36
With some public-sector customers, Cisco has started to conduct workshops that help customers prioritize their infrastructure investments, he said.
But for at least one young company, the specifics of the plan aren’t important. Daniel Shani, CEO and founder of a Boston-based startup that sells a product that, when laid on top of a road, generates energy when cars drive over it. Customers include parking garages that set the system up at slowdown points, potentially as a way to reduce their electricity spending.
Asked whether a robust infrastructure plan could persuade the company to more aggressively chase the federal market, Shani told Nextgov that his company will “absolutely be paying attention to it,” but that “it’s not taking us into any pivot or change in direction.”
The plan, whatever shape it takes, would take several years to implement, he said.
“From the lens of a startup, we are generally not looking too far out, so predictions only carry so much weight,” he said, though he added that it’s “very encouraging to feel there’s going to be support for domestic manufacturing, infrastructure [and] national security.”
More concrete discussions about infrastructure spending, and the opportunities it could provide for contractors, could emerge soon. During her confirmation hearing in mid-January 2017, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao said she would try to provide more details about plans in about 30 days.
“One of the major complaints is how long it takes for projects to be ready for bidding,” she said during that hearing. “So the issue is not only how to fund infrastructure projects, but how to increase the pipeline of available projects for all groups, private sector included, to be able to participate.”
Right: DOT vendors most at risk for agency reprogramming and spending reallocation. Consulting service providers and system integrators for the DOT could see a wave of new spending if the Trump Administration can find its way to passing a large infrastructure spending bill.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
37
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
TIPPS-4
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
SEWP V
2
224
27
$717.4 M
$395.2 M
$230.6 M
SEWP IV Small Business 16 $63.6 M
President Trump and Congressional Republicans have made it clear that tax reform is a high priority. Any new legislation could spur market opportunity for Treasury contractors as any overhaul of the tax code could create a wave of spending on consulting services and IT. Such a realization may even prompt merger and acquisition activity among the Treasury’s competitive landscape.
$12.6 B Budget Authority
$6.1 B Contract Spend
3.5%
9.0% 8.9 K Contracts
4.0 K Vendors
8.4%
1.3%
15.4%
11.6%
4.1%
4.5%
Actual 36.2%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 37.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
TRE MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
19 38
54
100 100 2.0 2.0
52 58 3.8 2.9
67 62 2.3 2.5
4
34
30
5
35
55$99.9 M
$110.1 M
$41.0 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
25 35
Purisolve Inc.
FCN Inc.
AT&T Inc. (T)
24
IT & Telecommunications Programming (D308)
Computer Software (7030) Precious Metals (9660)Base Metal Refinery (9650)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.37%
1.17%
0.14%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
38
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
TRE MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
6
3
11
12
16
12
62
84
54
84
62
77
58
80
4.9
1.0
2.4
4.3
7.2
1.0
2.3
3.3
66
56
50
72
66
56
46
70
4.5
2.6
3.6
4.4
7.1
2.4
3.8
5.9
51
86
82
80
81
86
49
86
82
76
67
74
3.2
4.0
1.0
6.2
3.8
6.5
3.4
4.2
1.0
4.7
4.1
2.7
1
3
3
5
1
1
31
16
52
7
2
16
8
7
1
4
4
7
1
1
40
18
42
7
2
15
9
7
$708.3 M
$142.3 M
$85.2 M
$225.0 M
$127.0 M
$71.9 M
$576.5 M
$143.3 M
$286.6 M
$138.4 M
$860.9 M
$145.9 M
$131.2 M
$98.9 M
2
4
7
10
13
5
9
11
8
1715
Coins ‘N Things Inc.
Crane & Co. Inc.
Gold Brass and Copper Holdings Inc. (BRSS)
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
A-Mark Precious Metals Inc. (AMRK)
PMX Industries Inc.
LeachGarner Inc.
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)
Sunshine Minting Inc.
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH)
Jarden Corp. (JAH)
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Accenture PLC (ACN)
Unisys Corp. (UIS)
Notable Vendors
0.34%
0.25%
1.31%
0.54%
0.68%
1.05%
1.32%
0.19%
2.97%
0.16%
0.45%
0.59%
0.12%
0.16%
Related Govini Market View: Department of the Treasury FY16
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
39
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
Alliant - IT Services
8(a) STARS II
375
1
1
$211.0 M
$125.4 M
$123.9 M
874 - MOBIS 67 $60.1 M
USDA’s landscape can be defined as food producers, food transporters, management consultants and technology integrators. The ecosystem is designed to fulfill USDA’s mission in supporting the safe production of food. The established contractor ecosystem is critical to efficiency. It will be difficult for the Trump Administration to drastically reprogram USDA spending as the agency has a less flexible contracting environment.
$25.7 B Budget Authority
$5.9 B Contract Spend
2.7%
7.6% 35.8 K Contracts
16.6 K Vendors
3.1%
4.2%
16.9%
9.9%
4.0%
3.9%
Actual56.2%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 52.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
USDA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
13
39
82 74 1.5 1.4
63 56 2.1 1.9
43 42 11.4 10.0
4
14
9
4
19
15$36.7 M
$52.0 M
$35.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
22 48
CACI International Inc. (CACI)
Dell Inc.
Frozsun Inc.
14
Dairy Foods & Eggs (8910)
Meat, Poultry & Fish (8905)
Fruits & Vegetables (8915)
Conservation/Forest Fire Suppression (F003)
Crude Agricultural & Forestry Products (9440)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.49%
0.20%
0.06%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
40
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
USDA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
25
26
6
20
17
16
16
88
46
76
87
87
42
75
88
3.2
1.7
3.1
15.8
3.5
2.8
3.1
14.5
95
74
95
48
95
65
81
46
3.6
1.3
6.7
3.7
3.1
1.2
7.1
4.3
65
81
96
63
62
78
61
73
96
62
51
77
7.9
3.8
1.0
7.8
8.0
1.2
8.0
1.6
1.0
8.0
7.0
1.3
5
23
13
31
4
6
5
43
3
20
1
5
41
9
4
18
9
37
4
6
8
58
2
8
1
2
23
9
$51.1 M
$88.9 M
$33.7 M
$49.3 M
$131.3 M
$39.5 M
$54.0 M
$49.7 M
$48.6 M
$103.6 M
$66.6 M
$108.6 M
$62.7 M
$83.8 M
2
24
8
22
18
7
12
19
2320
Aero Flite Inc.
Hormel Foods Corp. (HRL)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
Archer Daniels Midland Co. (ADM)
Neptune Aviation Services Inc.
ICL Performance Products LP
LD Commodities Grains Merchandising LLC
Tyson Foods Inc. (TSN)
Leprino Foods Co.
CHS Inc. (CHSCP)
Heartland Technology Group LLC
Dairy Farmers of America Inc.
Cargill Kitchen Solutions Inc.
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Notable Vendors
0.62%
1.02%
0.05%
0.01%
0.65%
0.28%
0.09%
0.59%
0.06%
1.40%
0.06%
0.32%
1.28%
0.05%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Agriculture FY16
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
41
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
Alliant - IT Services
DOE ESPC
1867
1
9
$232.6 M
$217.0 M
$188.6 M
874 - MOBIS 603 $85.2 M
GSA’s mission to deliver the best value in real estate acquisition and technology services by driving down the price of procurement and reducing cost to agencies aligns with the Trump Administration’s goal of reducing government spending. Motor Vehicle vendors have a strong representation in this year’s Scorecard with Ford, Chrysler and General Motors solidifying top rankings.
N/A Budget Authority
$4.9 B Contract Spend 15.4% 24.4 K Contracts
16.8 K Vendors
0.5%
2.1%
21.6%
9.2%
5.3%
3.9%
Actual 39.2%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 36.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
GSA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
11 15 82 82 406.7 251.1
76 74 191.1 200.7
82 85 455.5 473.4
31
4
19
29
2
15$71.4 M
$43.8 M
$161.3 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
19 44
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
The Dun & Bradstreet Corp. (DNB)
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH)
13
Office Building Repair (Z2AA)
Motor Vehicles (2310)Office Building Construction (Y1AA)
Professional Support (R499)
Janitorial/Housekeeping (S201) SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
1.07%
0.75%
0.89%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksGENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
42
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
GSA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3
6
30
18
14
81
95
96
95
85
N/A
96
78
6.0
3.0
6.0
3.3
5.0
N/A
5.0
2.0
79
95
68
87
100
84
72
87
6.0
7.3
97.7
8.0
3.3
7.9
114.5
8.4
83
95
100
95
95
90
83
N/A
96
95
82
82
6.0
5.0
139.6
3.0
10.0
4.6
5.0
N/A
70.5
3.0
10.1
16.0
3
1
1
2
2
2
29
4
3
1
2
1
1
2
4
N/A
3
1
3
3
27
4
6
N/A
1
1
3
4
$206.5 M
$78.3 M
$42.9 M
$101.1 M
$50.6 M
$28.3 M
$222.4 M
$144.5 M
$170.1 M
$31.9 M
$330.1 M
$150.1 M
$55.4 M
$39.7 M
10
15
4
12
61
916
Ford Motor Co. (F)
Atkinson/Clark JV
RP Automotive Inc.
Stronghold Engineering Inc.
Chrysler Group LLC (FCAU)
M.A. Mortenson Co.
Honeywell International Inc. (HON)
Navistar International Corp. (NAV)
General Motors Co. (GM)
Walsh Puerto Rico LLC
Alliant Solutions Partner LLC
The Christman Co.
Brasada Ford LTD
Brasfield & Gorrie LLC
Notable Vendors
1.66%
1.07%
0.81%
4.53%
2.93%
3.40%
0.00%
0.35%
0.50%
1.84%
0.09%
0.92%
Related Govini Market View: General Services Administration FY16
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENTAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
43
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
SWIFT IV
874 - MOBIS
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
4
23
51
$177.6 M
$126.4 M
$89.8 M
520 - FABS 14 $31.3 M
USAID, like several civilian agencies, is facing proposed budget cuts by the Trump Administration. Despite a modest decline in contract spend, USAID saw a strong increase in Technical Engineering & Professional Support in FY16 compared to the past 3 year average. This growth led to increases for Chemonics, Tetra Tech and Creative Associates International.
$24.3 B Budget Authority
$4.7 B Contract Spend
3.0%
4.1% 7.0 K Contracts
1.6 K Vendors
9.6%
5.3%
5.6%
3.4%
1.2%
0.2%
Actual 13.2%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 11.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
USAID MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
16 49
12
72 72 2.0 3.3
74 83 1.9 2.0
79 77 5.2 5.2
4
5
12
4
5
17$42.7 M
$37.4 M
$40.1 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
23 50
MacFadden & Associates Inc.
ICF International Inc. (ICFI)
International Business & Technical Consultants Inc.
20
Medical Instruments (6515)
Technical Assistance (R421)
Program Management (R408)
Professional Support (R499)
Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.58%
0.26%
0.46%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksAGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
44
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
USAID MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
4
5
7
10
9
16
12
78
80
76
75
78
74
75
71
4.6
4.1
5.4
6.3
4.3
3.2
4.9
5.8
81
66
71
79
76
66
75
78
4.5
1.0
2.7
5.7
4.4
1.0
2.2
6.8
69
82
89
72
96
77
N/A
81
93
71
96
74
1.0
5.8
7.7
5.9
7.0
4.5
N/A
6.0
8.3
5.9
7.0
4.1
77
14
62
20
48
1
5
21
1
20
3
12
1
29
96
17
52
18
48
1
7
16
N/A
18
2
14
1
31
$136.2 M
$148.8 M
$48.1 M
$146.2 M
$67.0 M
$93.5 M
$372.0 M
$122.7 M
$76.6 M
$89.5 M
$1.0 B
$154.7 M
$348.9 M
$95.4 M
11
30
2
52
14
3
11
29
1317
Chemonics International Inc.
Abt Associates Inc.
Development Alternatives Inc.
Research Triangle Institute
Tetra Tech Inc. (TTEK)
Kenya Medical Supplies Authority
John Snow Inc.
FHI 360 LLC
Partnership for Supply Chain Management Inc.
AECOM Inc. (ACM)
Renaissance Information Systems Inc.
Creative Associates International Inc.
Remote Medical International
Management Systems International
Notable Vendors
10.83%
0.30%
1.37%
0.19%
3.08%
2.26%
7.08%
0.59%
0.04%
0.11%
2.22%
1.22%
0.66%
Related Govini Market View: Agency for International Development FY16
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCEAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
45
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
NOAALink
874 - MOBIS
314
10
59
$240.0 M
$109.7 M
$105.6 M
NIH CIO-SP3 Small Business 2 $77.0 M
Trade and Commerce has been a primary pillar in President Trump’s political platform. The Trump Administration may find contracting flexibility at the DOC via sub-agencies National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Institute of Standards. Together these agencies account for 62.2 percent of the DOC’s 2017 expiring contracts.
$9.4 B Budget Authority
$3.5 B Contract Spend
9.2%
11.5% 15.8 K Contracts
7.8 K Vendors
1.8%
4.6%
17.4%
11.6%
4.9%
4.2%
Actual 41.4%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 40.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOC MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
12 6
11
72 66 2.2 2.4
68 72 3.4 3.4
69 60 1.8 1.6
3
10
5
5
9
10$27.3 M
$49.4 M
$32.4 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
17 44
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Earth Resources Technology Inc.
MITRE Corp.
14
Space Vehicle Components (1820)
Support - Management: Other (R799)
Space Systems R&D (AR35)
Professional Support (R499)
IT & Telecommunications Systems Development (D302)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.33%
0.09%
0.30%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
46
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOC MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
15
12
33
8
18
68
72
90
65
70
77
90
66
3.1
2.9
2.0
1.5
2.8
4.3
2.0
1.4
73
95
81
81
73
N/A
68
81
1.0
7.0
2.0
3.2
1.0
N/A
1.3
2.8
61
66
77
63
86
100
64
70
77
60
86
68
1.9
1.0
1.7
1.7
3.1
11.3
1.9
1.1
2.0
1.7
3.4
6.0
6
3
1
14
3
1
6
4
20
7
11
34
3
2
7
4
1
19
3
N/A
7
4
21
9
9
27
3
1
$296.0 M
$103.4 M
$43.4 M
$308.2 M
$40.9 M
$20.0 M
$111.2 M
$54.7 M
$50.3 M
$26.7 M
$337.2 M
$96.4 M
$32.5 M
$43.9 M
4
19
10
20
3
7
16
2
522
Raytheon Co. (RTN)
T-Rex Corp.
UT-Battelle LLC
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)
Ball Corp. (BLL)
Hensel Phelps Construction Co.
Accenture PLC (ACN)
Cyberdata Technologies Inc.
Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT)
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Harris Corp. (HRS)
Ace Info Solutions Inc.
Diversified Global Partners JV LLC
Notable Vendors
1.32%
2.71%
0.30%
1.47%
0.13%
0.56%
0.23%
1.60%
1.05%
0.55%
1.59%
0.31%
0.37%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Commerce FY16
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
47
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
SEWP V
874 - MOBIS
388
63
51
$105.0 M
$88.5 M
$35.2 M
84 - Total Solutions for Law Enforcement 76 $30.2 M
DOI will be critical for President Trump’s energy development goals as it oversees energy exploration on public lands. The Trump Administration will have the opportunity to reverse Obama-era rules that limit public land development and promote clean energy. Vendors that perform construction or facility maintenance may find themselves in a strong position to capture spending from Trump-driven energy policies.
$13.2 B Budget Authority
$3.1 B Contract Spend
8.4%
7.5% 30.2 K Contracts
16.2 K Vendors
1.1%
2.7%
27.1%
12.8%
5.0%
4.9%
Actual 59.7%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 53.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOI MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
13
99
71 71 2.2 3.9
82 92 5.3 5.7
73 70 5.1 6.7
5
3
6
5
2
6$16.7 M
$13.5 M
$20.8 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
20
Software House International Inc.
Valdez International Corp.
Chenega Corp.
18
Technical Engineering & Professional Support (R425)
General Architecture & Engineering (C219)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Professional Support (R499)
Transportation, Travel &Lodging (V221)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.67%
0.11%
0.37%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
48
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOI MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
10
11
13
32
12
92
96
86
84
90
84
80
81
5.0
3.0
1.6
2.3
5.0
7.0
2.6
2.3
73
95
85
62
73
N/A
68
62
4.2
6.0
1.8
7.3
5.5
N/A
1.0
6.2
80
77
79
74
80
82
72
72
60
52
80
72
4.9
3.0
1.5
2.5
1.0
2.0
5.0
3.1
2.2
1.0
1.0
2.0
2
2
7
7
6
1
2
11
3
10
3
2
1
5
3
1
10
6
8
N/A
4
12
2
11
4
1
1
4
$29.6 M
$37.8 M
$19.1 M
$21.4 M
$17.6 M
$16.6 M
$37.0 M
$21.8 M
$20.4 M
$28.9 M
$35.6 M
$22.7 M
$32.3 M
$24.4 M
5
4
15
11
97
2017
Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Inc.
Swank Enterprises
CACI International Inc. (CACI)
General Dynamics Corp. (GD)
SEACOR Holdings Inc. (CKH)
NW Construction Inc.
Kaktovik Inupiat Corp.
Nuaxis LLC
Moltz Constructors Inc.
CH2M HILL Companies LTD
Dewberry & Davis LLC
Martin Brothers Construction
SEI Investments Co. (SEIC)
Mythics Inc.
Notable Vendors
0.33%
0.73%
0.02%
0.09%
0.02%
0.66%
0.34%
0.96%
1.29%
0.06%
0.55%
0.06%
0.10%
Related Govini Market View: Department of the Interior FY16
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
49
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
520 - FABS
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
874 - MOBIS
13
67
22
$634.2 M
$72.1 M
$44.4 M
GSA USA Contact 1 $42.7 M
The Department of Education will see privatization efforts coming from the Trump Administration. Policy change may include an emphasis in charter schools and greater private sector involvement regarding Federal student loans. This may cause disruption for vendors that manage and service student loan payment systems including Great Lakes Higher Education, Navient and Continental Services Group.
$68.3 B Budget Authority
$2.5 B Contract Spend
2.0%
6.8% 1.2 K Contracts
827 Vendors
4.4%
0.6%
6.0%
6.0%
1.2%
0.6%
Actual 23.4%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 25.5%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Billions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
EDU MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
13 31
29
96 94 2.1 2.1
71 71 4.8 4.0
96 96 26.0 26.0
2
4
1
3
4
1$24.7 M
$49.4 M
$47.6 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
24 43
Educational Testing Service Inc.
DXC Technology Co. (DXC)
Transworld Systems Inc.
15
Special Studies & Analysis(Other Than Scientific) (B506)
IT Facility Operations & Maintenance (D301)
Special Studies & Analysis (B542)
Financial Management (R710)
Debt Collection Management (R705)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.75%
0.67%
0.45%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
50
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
EDU MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3
2
11
17
14
26
14
53
76
79
81
53
69
79
82
3.5
2.9
26.0
2.7
1.6
2.4
26.0
2.5
57
69
79
86
57
69
79
88
3.7
3.6
26.0
4.6
2.1
1.7
26.0
4.6
56
88
96
93
96
100
56
88
96
93
96
78
3.1
4.0
26.0
2.0
26.0
52.0
1.7
3.4
26.0
2.0
26.0
26.0
2
2
1
22
1
1
1
14
1
3
1
1
1
2
2
3
1
22
1
1
1
13
1
2
1
1
1
1
$150.0 M
$106.7 M
$50.0 M
$86.6 M
$53.6 M
$40.5 M
$183.8 M
$146.5 M
$54.9 M
$57.3 M
$202.8 M
$161.0 M
$62.8 M
$69.4 M
1
5
12
7
16
4
6
11
8
1017
Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of
Accenture PLC (ACN)
Continental Service Group Inc.
Westat Inc.
Great Lakes Higher Education Corp.
Navient Corp. (NAVI)
Windham Professionals Inc.
American Institutes for Research
Nelnet Inc. (NNI)
Dell Inc.
GC Services Limited Partnership
MAXIMUS Inc. (MMS)
Account Control Technology Inc.
Financial Management Systems
Notable Vendors
2.85%
0.35%
0.16%
0.01%
2.82%
2.70%
0.26%
0.71%
1.78%
0.55%
0.06%
0.73%
0.78%
1.13%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Education FY16
DEPARTMENT OF LABORAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
51
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
874 - MOBIS
NIH CIO-SP3 Small Business
172
30
1
$140.4 M
$44.4 M
$33.9 M
8(a) STARS II 1 $27.4 M
The DOL is an agency that relies heavily on services. In fact, this poses an opportunity for the Trump Administration to realign priorities within the agency as 81 percent of DOL contracts set to expire in 2017 are services related. Most of this work involves operating training facilities, managing job education programs and financial services related to pensions.
$12.2 B Budget Authority
$2.2 B Contract Spend
1.9%
4.0% 3.2 K Contracts
1.8 K Vendors
9.6%
8.0%
22.9%
12.0%
4.7%
2.8%
Actual 36.0%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 35.1%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOL MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
12 36
38
77 72 1.0 2.0
78 70 3.5 2.9
96 92 4.0 4.1
2
15
1
1
10
2$14.5 M
$48.0 M
$19.0 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
19 57
MAXIMUS Inc. (MMS)
Odle Management Group LLC
Inforeliance Corp.
17
Non-Government Owned Educational Building Operations (M1CZ)Vocational & Technical Training (U006)
Financial Management (R710)
Professional Support (R499)
Government Owned Educational Building Operations (M139)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.46%
1.42%
0.33%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF LABOR
52
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
DOL MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
5
25
8
9
11
13
71
71
91
71
73
72
91
76
1.7
1.9
1.0
1.6
1.6
2.0
1.0
1.7
96
75
70
76
96
78
76
75
1.5
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.6
1.9
1.9
2.0
63
65
69
78
75
72
80
67
78
78
77
95
3.9
1.8
3.1
2.0
2.2
2.4
5.8
1.8
3.2
2.1
2.4
5.0
41
33
1
10
2
14
22
18
1
10
10
1
20
4
34
30
1
8
2
7
17
22
2
9
7
1
17
1
$22.5 M
$51.3 M
$49.4 M
$21.9 M
$80.0 M
$20.4 M
$29.5 M
$70.5 M
$85.1 M
$56.2 M
$236.5 M
$147.1 M
$21.5 M
$40.9 M
12
13
4
7
15
19
2
11
10
2616
Management and Training Corp.
Adams & Associates Inc.
Parsons Corp.
Foxmar Inc.
Trowbridge & Trowbridge LLC
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (BAH)
ResCare Inc.
Minact Inc.
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
Chugach Alaska Corp.
Alutiiq LLC
Office Remedies Inc.
Career Systems Development Corp.
Serrato Corp.
Notable Vendors
2.32%
0.81%
0.46%
0.25%
0.43%
1.78%
0.58%
1.15%
0.29%
1.13%
0.32%
0.00%
0.28%
0.43%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Labor FY16
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
53
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
Alliant - IT Services
EPA ITS-BISS II
144
1
1
$135.6 M
$73.7 M
$19.2 M
EPA IMCS III 3 $18.1 M
President Trump has stated publicly that he does not believe in climate change nor does he support the majority of the EPA’s mission. The Trump Administration will work to roll back many of the Obama-era climate change policies and regulations. Construction and Environmental Service vendors will face the most risk with a dismantling of the EPA. These two categories account for 65.2 percent of EPA’s 2017 expiring contracts.
$8.1 B Budget Authority
$1.6 B Contract Spend
0.0%
4.7% 3.6 K Contracts
2.1 K Vendors
6.4%
5.6%
14.8%
5.9%
4.0%
0.6%
Actual 40.1%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 41.8%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
EPA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
17 91
32
82 83 1.7 2.6
87 82 3.6 4.0
81 81 1.8 1.7
3
8
4
5
9
4$15.0 M
$24.8 M
$16.0 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
23 41
KEMRON Environmental Services Inc.
CB&I (CBI) (formerly The Shaw Group Inc.)
Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC)
19
Environmental Services (F999)
Professional Support (R499)
Environmental Remediation (F108)
Computer Software (7030)
Landscaping & Interior Design (C211)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.73%
0.37%
0.36%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
54
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
EPA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
3
11
2
4
24
12
81
82
79
76
81
84
77
76
3.3
6.1
1.9
2.1
3.1
4.7
1.8
2.3
83
81
85
79
82
82
80
80
2.0
1.9
2.1
2.3
1.7
1.9
2.1
2.2
100
87
81
81
82
85
100
84
79
79
81
83
3.3
6.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.3
8.6
5.7
1.9
2.2
2.1
2.0
4
4
11
3
13
26
25
11
9
5
13
11
3
18
4
4
13
3
12
24
25
10
7
7
13
10
4
20
$64.9 M
$36.6 M
$40.7 M
$44.4 M
$28.9 M
$36.0 M
$78.2 M
$84.4 M
$56.1 M
$36.2 M
$91.9 M
$43.5 M
$39.5 M
$25.7 M
6
5
18
39
13
33
15
11
7
2120
CGI Federal Inc. (GIB)
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (JEC)
Weston Solutions Inc.
Electronics Consulting Services Inc.
Environmental Restoration LLC
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Tetra Tech Inc. (TTEK)
CH2M HILL Companies LTD
Amec Foster Wheeler PLC (AMFW)
EA Engineering, Science & Technology Inc.
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Environmental Quality Management Inc.
Guardian Environmental Service Co. Inc.
ICF International Inc. (ICFI)
Notable Vendors
2.50%
0.01%
0.08%
1.34%
1.94%
0.15%
0.91%
0.87%
3.07%
0.53%
1.11%
0.38%
1.21%
0.01%
Related Govini Market View: Environmental Protection Agency FY16
The 10 Largest Programs on Trump’s Chopping Block
55
By Eric Katz, Government Executive
President Trump requested an array of cuts in his fiscal 2018 budget to arrive at $54 billion in overall reductions in domestic agency discretionary spending.
He proposed eliminating entirely 19 independent agencies, though the real meat in terms of dollars came from inside Cabinet-level agencies. By the White House’s estimate, Trump proposed cutting hundreds of programs entirely. More than 50 activities would be on the chopping block at the Environmental Protection Agency alone, though that accounts for only 0.6 percent of the total cuts.
The White House defended most of the program cuts by saying they have not lived up to their stated purpose, or they fail to demonstrate evidence of their success. In some cases, the programs simply do not align with Trump’s priorities.
“Every agency and department will be driven to achieve greater efficiency and to eliminate wasteful spending in carrying out their honorable service to the American people,” Trump wrote in his budget.
Ultimately, Congress will have final say in how agencies fund their programs, and many activities that enjoy bipartisan support are likely to survive. Here’s a look at the 10 largest programs Trump proposed to eliminate and their fiscal 2017 appropriation.
Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program ($3.4B): Trump’s budget proposed cutting 18 percent of the Health and Human Services Department’s fiscal 2018 budget, in part by eliminating LIHEAP. The reduction would account for nearly one-quarter of the overall cuts at HHS. LIHEAP, created in 1981, subsidizes energy costs for low-income families and is run by HHS’ Administration for Children and Families. The program makes
up 6 percent of the budget for ACF, which employs more than 1,300 individuals. Trump would also eliminate the Energy Department’s Weatherization Assistance Program, a $121 million program that works in conjunction with LIHEAP by helping low-income families reduce energy consumption by making their homes more energy efficient.
Community Development Block Grant ($3B): One of the Housing and Urban Development Department’s most high-profile projects provides grants to state and local governments for infrastructure, housing and other public services. The program, created in 1974, represents about half of Trump’s proposed cuts at HUD. It is administered by HUD’s Community Planning and Development office, which has its own assistant secretary and employs 258 people. The block grant program makes up about 45 percent of the CPD budget.
Supporting Effective Instruction State Grants Program ($2.4B): The Education Department would absorb more than 25 percent of its cuts through the elimination of this program, which provides funding to state and local education agencies to hire more teachers and principals and to improve their quality and effectiveness. The program falls under the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, which has 244 employees.
Global Climate Change Initiative ($1.3B): Obama created this initiative in response to United Nations agreements reached in 2009 and 2010. Administered by the State Department, it has integrated climate change priorities into U.S. foreign assistance. Eliminating the initiative would also affect programs at the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Treasury Department. State and Treasury rely on the UN and other international organizations to implement the program.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
56
21st Century Community Learning Centers Program ($1.2B): Trump proposed significantly increasing funding for school choice initiatives such as charter schools and vouchers for private institutions, leading to significant cuts at the rest of the Education Department. The community learning centers help “high-need” schools implement in and out-of-school activities in non-school hours, such as expanded learning time programs. The program is administered in the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education’s Office of Academic Improvement. Trump’s proposal to cut funding for after-school programs caused a significant stir in the days since he released his budget.
Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grant Program ($732M): The third Education Department program in the 10 largest proposed cuts would eliminate funding for undergraduate students with demonstrated financial need to receive up to $4,000 per academic year. It is administered in Education’s Federal Student Aid office, which houses about one-third of the department’s 4,300 employees. Colleges and universities partially match the federal funding, which provides assistance to 1.6 million students.
Community Services Block Grants ($715M): Like LIHEAP, CSBG is administered by HHS’ Administration for Children and families. The program aims to “alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty in communities,” such as employment, education, nutrition and emergency services. CSBG has staff at 10 different regions throughout the country, as well at ACF’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. Together with LIHEAP, Trump’s elimination of CSBG would zero-out ACF’s Office of Community Services’ discretionary programs altogether.
Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery Grant ($499M): TIGER grants fund local transportation projects that are “difficult to fund through traditional federal programs.” The funding must go to construction rather than design and planning with grants awarded on a competitive basis. Obama created the Transportation Department program in 2009.
Water and Waste Disposal Loan and Grant Program ($498M): The largest cut at the Agriculture Department eliminates a program that helps rural households and businesses obtain reliable drinking water systems, sanitary waste and sewage disposal and storm water drainage. It is administered by USDA Rural Development’s Rural Utility Service, which employs 265 individuals.
Senior Community Service Employment Program ($434M): The Labor Department’s largest cut would eliminate a program designed to help low-income, unemployed seniors engage in job training. It was created in 1965 and allows older Americans to participate in activities at schools, hospitals, day-care centers and other facilities. Labor’s Employment and Training Administration, which has 1,100 employees, runs the program.
Left: Agencies with increasing reprogramming potential are candidates to support President Trump’s reform agenda in the near-term.
Agencies such as EPA and Education are already in the Administration’s sights as President Trump’s proposed budget attempts to reprioritize spending.
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
57
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
SSA ITSSC
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
Alliant - IT Services
4
110
1
$314.2 M
$206.2 M
$23.0 M
00CORP - The Consolidated Schedule 4 $10.0 M
On the campaign trail, then-candidate Trump promised to leave Social Security and Medicaid alone, and in his Budget Blueprint no cuts were proposed to these popular entitlement programs. Northrop Grumman and Leidos retain the top two rankings in part due to large IT support services contracts due to expire by the end of 2017.
$10.5 B Budget Authority
$1.5 B Contract Spend
3.4%
10.0% 4.9 K Contracts
4.2 K Vendors
1.9%
4.8%
8.7%
13.4%
3.2%
1.6%
Actual 36.7%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 36.8%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
SSA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
11 8
5
79 69 4.2 3.8
83 88 1.5 1.2
89 89 1.5 1.7
3
4
3
3
3
3$17.4 M
$31.2 M
$35.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
22 18
Red River Computer Co. Inc.
International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)
XMCO Inc.
14
Medical/Psychiatric Consultation (Q526)
IT & Telecommunications (D399)
Computer Software (7030)
Expert Witness (R424)
Software Components & Services (7050)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
0.73%
2.12%
0.07%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksSOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
58
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
SSA MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1
7
21
11
15
13
73
92
74
96
82
96
75
96
1.8
5.0
2.3
1.0
1.6
3.0
2.1
1.0
76
80
96
92
82
80
94
88
2.5
1.1
2.3
1.2
2.3
1.1
2.1
1.8
93
96
95
95
70
86
93
90
95
93
70
77
1.2
4.0
12.0
2.4
4.0
1.4
1.1
4.6
12.0
1.9
4.0
1.7
3
2
3
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
3
1
3
3
2
3
1
1
1
5
$80.9 M
$47.4 M
$24.1 M
$48.7 M
$26.6 M
$18.8 M
$104.4 M
$47.5 M
$35.9 M
$17.5 M
$124.5 M
$63.9 M
$43.3 M
$23.0 M
2
9
10
13
17
3
12
12
4
2718
Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC)
Westat Inc.
Accenture PLC (ACN)
EPS Corp.
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
CA Inc. (CA)
Dell Inc.
PCMG Inc.
Four Inc.
EMC Corp. (EMC)
MVM Inc.
CSRA Inc. (CSRA)
Avaya Inc.
DLT Solutions Inc.
Notable Vendors
0.35%
4.17%
0.05%
0.81%
0.87%
0.27%
0.53%
0.32%
0.04%
1.57%
0.07%
0.34%
0.48%
0.39%
Related Govini Market View: Social Security Administration FY16
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENTAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
59
Significant Movers
Contracting Overview
Product and Service Spend
Vehicle Contracts Spend 3 YR $
3 YR %
Set-Aside Performance
Contract Vehicles
Actual Against Goal
70 - General Purpose Commercial IT
SEWP V
8(a) STARS II
30
8
1
$62.4 M
$31.9 M
$24.2 M
874 - MOBIS 16 $23.7 M
Despite having the smallest amount of contract spend of all the Scorecard agencies, HUD may be a bright spot for the Trump Administration as it looks to reallocate spending. HUD has large Professional Service and IT contracts set to expire in 2017. The Professional Service contracts involve real estate brokerage and property management, while the IT work is related to debt collection and asset management systems.
$37.8 B Budget Authority
$1.1 B Contract Spend
24.4%
6.2% 981 Contracts
662 Vendors
33.1%
24.7%
23.3%
20.1%
4.4%
1.2%
Actual 46.3%
2016
Gro
wth
Com
pare
d to
3 Y
R Av
erag
e
Goal 35.0%
5.0%
5.0%
3.0%
3.0%
2016 Spend Millions
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
HUD MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
14 86
39
74 78 1.9 2.5
96 96 2.3 1.9
96 96 1.0 1.0
3
3
1
4
2
1$9.5 M
$12.0 M
$22.5 M
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
21 42
KPMG LLP
CACI International Inc. (CACI)
Ampcus Inc.
20
IT & Telecommunications Strategy and Architecture (D307)
Program Management (R408)
Residential Building Maintenance (Z1FZ)
Financial Management (R710)
Real Estate Brokerage Support (R402)
SB
WOSB
SDB
HZ
SDVOB
1.81%
0.55%
0.42%
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksDEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
60
Top Vendors
2016 2015 (Including Subsidiaries and Wholly Owned Companies Unless Noted)
Rank VendorShare of
HUD MarketVendor Revenue
CapturedVendor
Contract ActionsVendor Contract
ComplexityCompetitors Per Contract Action
1
2016 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 20152016
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
3
10
11
15
25
22
12
95
88
100
77
95
88
100
60
7.0
6.9
79.1
1.0
7.0
6.7
83.9
1.0
96
69
62
66
96
65
62
69
53.2
1.6
2.7
1.0
53.0
1.2
2.3
1.0
84
82
79
61
88
67
96
69
96
61
73
67
82.6
1.0
85.9
7.0
1.6
51.4
94.4
1.0
97.0
7.0
2.0
43.1
1
1
3
3
1
4
6
2
3
1
2
1
6
3
1
1
3
1
1
3
7
4
2
2
1
1
10
3
$83.8 M
$52.8 M
$23.5 M
$63.3 M
$45.2 M
$19.3 M
$111.7 M
$74.8 M
$50.4 M
$18.9 M
$119.1 M
$67.8 M
$39.3 M
$26.4 M
4
1
5
7
15
14
9
11
2
616
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Sage Acquisitions LLC
Matt Martin Real Estate Management LLC
EY
BLM Companies LLC
DXC Technology Co. (DXC)
Leidos Inc. (LDOS)
Dynaxys LLC
P.K. Management Group Inc.
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. (BK)
CWIS LLC
Selene Finance LP
Deloitte Consulting LLP
A2Z Field Services
Notable Vendors
4.86%
2.78%
0.11%
0.85%
5.13%
3.42%
0.58%
0.60%
5.21%
0.88%
1.39%
0.48%
1.21%
2.22%
Related Govini Market View: Department of Housing and Urban Development FY16
INDEXAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
61
Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage
34, 36
52
12
14
42
6
17, 20, 30, 32, 38, 46, 50, 58
26
54
19, 20, 37
46
60
52
19
59
6
60
50
12
32
23
16
46
42
50
6, 16
44
7
6, 8, 14
58
36
12
16, 44
40
Ace Info Solutions Inc.
American Institutes for Research
Alliant Solutions Partner LLC
Austal USA Inc.
BLM Companies LLC
Abt Associates Inc.
AM General LLC
Amerisource Bergen Corp.
Battelle Memorial Institute Inc.
ActioNet Inc.
Alutiiq LLC
Arctic Slope Regional Corp.
BAE Systems PLC
Avaya Inc.
23
20
Aegis Defense Services LLC
Astrix Inc.
14
28
Aero Flite Inc.
Aerospace Corp., The
AT&T Inc.
Agile Defense Inc.
ATA Aerospace LLC
Account Control Technology Inc.
Ameresco Inc.
Alion Science & Technology Corp.
Archer Daniels Midland Co.
Aurora Flight Services Corp.
Bell-Boeing Joint Project Office
40
10 20
14
Aerie Aerospace LLC
Adams & Associates Inc.
Alvarez & Associates
Arrow Electronics Inc.
Ball Corp.
Bank of New York Mellon Corp., The
30
24
ADC LTD
ADS Tactical Inc.
AECOM Inc.
Artel
Assurance Technology Corp.
Accenture PLC
Amec Foster Wheeler
Akal Security Inc.
Ampcus Inc.
Atkinson/Clark JV
Bechtel Group Inc.
AMFW
AMRC
ABC
ADM
ARW
ACM
BAESY
ALON
BLL
BK
ASB
T
Symbol Symbol Symbol
38A-Mark Precious Metals Inc.
A2Z Field Services
AMRK
ACN
60
Boeing Co., The
26Bollinger Shipyards Inc.
6, 7, 8, 9, 10,12, 24, 36
BA
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksINDEX
Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage
24
52
43, 44
38
30
8, 12, 20, 32, 39, 48, 59
42
26
46
20
35, 36
28
26
30
41, 42
32
40
19
40
18
58
60
5, 7, 18, 19, 20, 22, 26,28, 30, 33, 36, 45, 54, 58
11
52
40
14
Calibre Systems Inc.
CHS Inc.
CSI Aviation Inc.
Defense Support Services LLC
CA Inc.
Chugach Alaska Corp. Dairy Farmers of America Inc.
California Institute of Technology
Coins ‘N Things Inc.
CWIS LLC
CSRA Inc.
20Carrington Mortgage Services LLC
Continental Services Group Inc. 49, 50
Covenant Aviation Security LLC
CoreCivic Inc.
Caddell Construction Co.
Chrysler Group LLC
CNA Financial Corp.
Creative Associates International
Day & Zimmerman Group Inc.
20
16
Carahsoft Technology Corp.
Companion Data Services
Cyberdata Technologies Inc.
38
Cardinal Health Inc.
Career Systems Development Corp.
Cargill Kitchen Solutions Inc.
Computer Sciences Corp.
Consolidated Nuclear Security LLC
CACI International Inc.
Christman Group Co., The
Cisco Systems Inc.
Crane & Co. Inc.
DaVita Inc.
62
CSCOCAH
CXW
CSRA
CACI
CHSCP
DVA
CNA
CSC
Symbol Symbol Symbol
29Buchanan & Edwards Inc.
By Light Professional IT Services Inc.
CA
18
22
53
20, 30, 32, 54
CDW Corp.
CGI Federal Inc.
20
CB&I (formerly The Shaw Group)
60
CGS Administrators LLC
CBI
CDW
GIB
Brasfield & Gorrie LLC 42
16, 36, 48, 54
43, 44
47
34, 36
CH2M HILL Companies LTD
Chemonics International Inc.
Chenega Corp.
Chickasaw Nation Industries Inc.
FCAU
42
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.5, 14, 18, 19, 20,
36, 38, 41, 52
Brasada Ford LTD
BAH
20, 50, 58, 39Dell Inc.
Deloitte Consulting LLP19, 30, 32, 38,
40, 46, 60
INDEXAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
63
Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage
54
36, 60
41, 42
6
5, 6, 8, 20, 22, 30, 48
54
6, 22, 26, 49, 60
54
44
18
38
45
37
32
41, 42
26
60
58
50
7, 8, 10
29
27
30
11, 12
15
49, 50
41
10
22
26, 32
26
49
54 58
DynCorp International Inc.
Fluor Corp.
Express Scripts Inc.
General Motors Co.
Hanford Mission Support Co. LLC
Dun & Bradstreet Corp., The
Federal Express Corp.
Ford Motor Co.
GPC Consolidated Reporting
George Washington University, TheEA Engineering, Science & Technology Inc.
EY
Four Points Technology
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Geo Group Inc., The
22 52
EMC Corp.
GC Services Limited Partnership
54
50
Engility Corp.
Genco Distribution System Inc.
Environmental Quality Management Inc.
General Atomics Inc.
Dynaxys LLC
Financial Management Systems
EPS Corp.
Four Inc.
General Electric Co.
Guardian EnvironmentalService Co. Inc.
34, 36 18
39
Emergent BioSolutions Inc.
Earth Resources Technology Inc.
FCN Inc.
Foxmar Inc.
Gold Brass and Copper Holdings Inc.
58 19
Eastern Shipbuilding Group Inc.
Educational Testing Service Inc.
Electronics Consulting Services Inc.
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co.
Frozsun Inc.
DXC Technology Co.
FHI 360 LLC
Environmental Restoration LLC
Forfeiture Support Associates LLC
General Dynamics Corp.
Great Lakes Higher Education Corp.
F
FLR
ESRX
EMC
EBS
EGL
GD
GEO
GSK
DXC
FDX
BRSS
GE
GM
FMS
Symbol Symbol Symbol
46Diversified Global Partners JV LLC
DLT Solutions Inc.
DNB
20, 58
44
Dewberry & Davis LLC 48
Development Alternatives Inc.
8, 14, 19, 20, 24, 34, 36, 46Harris Corp. HRS
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksINDEX
64
Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage
11, 12
44
5-10, 14, 19, 20, 24, 36, 46
40
52
15, 36, 42
20, 26, 28, 35, 36, 38, 46, 57
48
38
425, 6, 25
38
25
17, 19
44
40
30
22
8, 10, 12, 16, 18, 20, 22, 26, 32, 34,
36, 41, 54, 57, 58, 60
13
34
18, 19
53
43
22
44
33, 36
16
43, 54
40
30 25
Human Solutions Inc.
KEMRON Environmental Services Inc.
Iron Bow Technologies
Longview InternationalTechnology Solutions Inc.
Management Systems International
Highmark Inc.
John Snow Inc.
Kenya Medical Supplies AuthorityMacDonald Dettwiler & Associates LTD
Humana Inc.
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.
Knowledge Consulting Group Inc.
LS Technologies LLC
Los Alamos National Security LLC
28 59
Inforeliance Corp.
LD Commodities GrainsMerchandising LLC
43
40
Insight Public Sector
LeachGarner Inc.
International Business & Technical Consultants Inc.
Leidos Inc.
Hormel Foods Corp.
Kelly Services Inc.
International DevelopmentSolutions LLC
Knight Point Systems LLC
Lockheed Martin Corp.
Management and Training Corp.
20 8, 10
16
InGenesis Inc.
Huntington Ingalls Inc.
Jarden Corp.
KPMG LLP
M.A. Mortenson Co.
51 25
ICF International Inc.
ICL Performance Products LP
In-Tec Construction Co.
L3 Technologies Inc. LLC
Lawrence LivermoreNational Security LLC
Honeywell International Inc.
Kaktovik Inupiat Corp.
International Business Machines Corp.
Kiewit-Turner JV
Leprino Foods Co.
MacFadden & Associates Inc.
ICFI
IBM
HUM
LDOS
HON
HRL
KELYB
JEC
JAH
MDA
LMT
LLL
Symbol Symbol Symbol
46Hensel Phelps Construction Co.
Hewlett-Packard Co. HPQ 9, 19
11, 12, 18
Heartland Technology Group LLC 40
Health Net Inc. HNT
32ManTech International Corp. MANT
Harris IT Services 20
24, 54
INDEXAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
65
Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage
17, 19, 20, 36
49, 50
48
44
34, 52
14
22
11
40
30
2234
42
48
10
36
19
22
34
21
18
27
16
6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 20, 24, 36, 38, 46, 57, 58
38
21
50
50
32, 58
52
15
34, 45 13
Microsoft Corp.
Northrop Grumman Corp.
National Security Technologies LLC
Patriot Team
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Medical Science & Computing LLC
Nelnet Inc.
Nuaxis LLC Phonak Inc.
MicroTech LLC
Navient Corp.
Odle Management Group LLC
Pennsylvania, Commonwealth of
PCMG Inc.
58 52
Moltz Constructors Inc.
P.K. Management Group Inc.
31
60
Mythics Inc.
PAE Inc.
NANA Regional Corp.
Palmetto GBA LLC
Merlin International
Noblis Inc.
National Government Services Inc.
Oceus Networks Inc.
Partnership for Supply Chain Management Inc.
Praxis Inc.
19, 20, 26, 29, 48 8, 24
7, 8
MVM Inc.
Midwest Air Traffic Control Service Inc.
Navistar International Corp.
Office Remedies Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
48 51
Minact Inc.
Mission Support Alliance LLC
MITRE Corp., The
Orbital ATK Inc.
Oshkosh Corp.
Merck & Co. Inc.
Neptune Aviation Services Inc.
National Fuel Gas Co.
NW Construction Inc.
Parsons Corp.
PMX Industries Inc.
NNI
NOC
NFG
OSK
MRK
MSFT
MCK
NAV
NAVI
PFE
OA
Symbol Symbol Symbol
50, 51MAXIMUS Inc.
McKesson Corp.
MMS
11, 12, 18
10
Matt Martin Real EstateManagement LLC 60
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
37Purisolve Inc.
Martin Brothers Construction 48
Vendor Vendor Vendor PagePagePage
35
48
10
11
38
44
16
52
14
33
60
47
48
52
5, 8, 20, 30, 34, 36, 40, 52, 53
12
42
43, 44, 54
44
48
3
5, 6, 7
44
22
46
23
32
9
42 13, 31
19
Research Triangle Institute
Siemens Corp.
SEACOR Holdings Inc.
Swank Enterprises
Remote Medical International
Serco Inc.
Sierra Nevada Corp.
Tetra Tech Inc.
REVA2
SEI Investments Co.
SpaceX
T-Rex Corp.
Syncom Space Services LLC
Thundercat Technology
60
Russia Space Agency
Strategic Analysis Inc.
22
14
Sallyport Global Holdings Inc.
Sanofi Pasteur
Stronghold Engineering Inc.
ResCare Inc.
Shell Oil Co.
Science Applications International Corp.
Sotera Defense Solutions Inc.
SupplyCore Inc.
9
24, 34, 48
Sage Acquisitions LLC
Robinson Aviation Inc.
Selene Finance LP
Technatomy Service Corp.
Torch Technologies Inc.
24 24
7
Rolling Bay LLC
Rolls-Royce Corp.
RP Automotive Inc.
Stinger Ghaffarian Technologies Inc.
Renaissance Information Systems Inc.
Serrato Corp.
Savannah River NuclearSolutions LLC
Software House International Inc.
Sunshine Minting Inc.
Textron Inc.
SRP
SIE
RR
TXT
SAIC
CKH
RDS
SEIC
TTEK
Symbol Symbol Symbol
20, 57Red River Computer Co. Inc.
Regents of the University of California, The
SNY
16
19
Raytheon Co. 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 34, 36, 46
Quest Diagnostics Inc.
RTN
DGX
19
14
Spherion Global Technology Inc.
SRI International
49
Tri-S Security Corp. 26
Transworld Systems Inc.
TRIS
Agency and Vendor BenchmarksINDEX
66
QinetiQ Group PLC 24QQ
INDEXAgency and Vendor Benchmarks
67
Vendor Vendor PagePage
9, 10, 24
42
57
40
50
6, 10, 32
50, 58
16
5
32
20, 26, 28, 38
34
24
52
54
11, 12
16
16, 46
Unisys Corp.
Wyle Inc.
Walsh Group LTD, The
Trowbridge & Trowbridge LLC
Weston Solutions Inc.
XMCO Inc.
United Launch Alliance LLC
Walsh Puerto Rico LLC
47
Valador Inc.
Ventech Solutions Inc.
UChicago Argonna LLC
World Wide Technology Inc.
VSE Corp.
21
Valdez International Corp.
United Technologies Corp.
Westat Inc.
18
UnitedHealth Group Inc.
URS-FNI-HZ Team
UT-Battelle LLC
Tyson Foods Inc.
Windham Professionals Inc.
UTX
UIS
UNH
Symbol Symbol
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp.
TSN
18
19
20Verizon Communications Inc.
Veterans Evaluation Services
VZ
30Triple Canopy Inc.
© 2017 Govini | All Rights Reserved
THE 2017 FEDERAL SCORECARD Agency and Vendor Benchmarks
Govini is the leading business intelligence platform for companies that sell to the public sector.
Across the entire business development lifecycle, Govini creates proprietary analytics which answer critical questions pertaining to addressable market size, opportunity qualification, competitive positioning and partner profiling.
By leveraging big data technology, Govini takes a fact-based approach to help clients master their market and follow the money.
The Govini database of record gives companies in every industry a distinct advantage when working with the government.
Govini
The public sector division of Atlantic Media, Government Executive Media Group is dedicated to providing government and national security leaders with trusted and useful insights and best practices to help them advance their organizations’ missions.
Through its market-leading Government Executive, Nextgov, Defense One, and Route Fifty brands, GEMG reaches over one million government influencers nationwide each month across digital, print and events offerings.
Government Executive Media Group
Govini.comGovExecMediaGroup.com