Agenda•Round Table•Project Goals/Priorities•Management documents & structure•Agreement Document•Responsibilities• Time-Line•Deliverables (also in technical context)•Budget and required formalities

•Technical Details (mostly on Thursday)•Tasks for the next few months

CELESTA Team• Anne-Sophie: payload engineer, mission operation• Raffaello: RM hardware and payload integration• Paul: Payload technical responsible• Ruben: component/effect specialist• Adam: Monte-Carlo calculations / radiation environment• Julien: CHARM responsible•Mathieu: CSU cubeSat platform responsible•Muriel: CSU project management & RHA• Laurent: Head of Montpellier Space Centre• Enrico: CERN KT fund responsible•Markus: CERN R2E responsible

CELESTA Targets/Objectives•Mission: demonstrate the equivalence between CHARM and LEO

environment•Objectives:• Technology demonstration: • Radmon cube-sat module• Validation of new cubeSat platform• cubeSat communication station at CHARM

• Scientific:• SEE energy dependency and relevance for LEO mssions

• Criteria of success:• Full success: statistically meaningful results for SEE measurements

and full coverage of RadMon dosimetry• Partial successful: Radmon functionality proven but limited statistics

Paul: Technical Requirements• Bus and interface payload/control/power

• Connectors• Integration• Available space• Possibility of mezzanine card• Integration test and assembly

Enrico: Comments• Satellite hardware• Ground station• Deliverable table for addendum document• Other documents• “Satellite User Manual” • “Launcher interface document”

• Scientific publications – IP questions• Previous mission results/expertise/feedback

Raffaello: Comments• ADC dies at 200 Gy, possibility to insert a mezzanine board?• Communication between Payload and OBDH. • The board power management is still the same? • Reduction of the payload the power consumption. • SEL candidates. The Brilliance is still the best candidate. • The Board size will be readjusted • Discussion on Data transmission rate • Temperature compensation of the RadFet

Urgent Actions• Decision on review requirements/follow-ups of platform

[Enrico, Muriel] -> ok, -> to be defined as review members• Iteration of missing items of addendum document [Muriel,

Markus]• Final iteration prior transmission to legal service [Enrico]• CERN accounts for Muriel, Matthieu and Laurent [Raffaello]

General Actions• Quantification and details concerning success criteria• Data of flight platform (incl. criteria) [Matthieu, Muriel]• Radmon operation and data taking, RadFet temperature compensation, etc

[Raffaello]• Statistical requirements for SEE measurements [Anne-Sophie, Ruben]

• Alignment of requirements with respect to project phases as required for space missions (Phase 0, A-F)• Definition of review committee: Montpellier, CERN, ESA, Swiss-Space • Common workspace for documents• Documentation requirements: CSU templates to be assigned• List of documents and naming to be updated to be conform between CERN/CSU

• Deliverable matrix to be completed including responsibilities• logo & communication plan

Technical Actions• CERN Ground Station requirement [Enrico, Raffaello, Matthieu]• Data volume and format requirement: to be detailed [Anne-

Sophie]• Check if the AMS ground station can be used for CELESTA

[Enrico]