agenda science center operation structure planning review reporting

18
Agenda Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Upload: linda-howard

Post on 16-Jan-2016

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Agenda

Science center operation• Structure

• Planning

• Review

• Reporting

Page 2: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Organizational Structure

Director

Associate Director

Research Section

Applications Section

Chesapeake Bay Program

Office

Administrative Officer

Visiting Scientists

Students

Contractors

Page 3: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Planning

Prevailing science directions and new projects

Inter-center and cross-mission collaboration Leadership in partnerships and alliances

outside the USGS

Page 4: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Fiscal health and outlookFunding Source Funding Stability Estimate Risk (use matrix)

% Gross ImpactLoss

Likelihood Low Moderate Significant High Severe

Fisheries 0 - 1 L AC X      

Terrestrial, Water & Marine Ecosystems

3 - 4

L U X      

Hydro Networks & Analysis 4 - 5

M ML     X    

National Geospatial Program 5 - 6

M AC   X    

Land Remote Sensing20 - 21

E U     X  

Land Change Science25 - 26

E U     X  

Volcano Hazards 1 - 2 L U X        

Coastal and Marine Geology 5 - 6

M U X      

Climate & Land Use Change 11 - 12

H ML     X  

DOS/DOD 5 - 6 M ML     X    

EPA 12 - 13 H U     X    

CDC 1 - 2 L U X        

Page 5: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Review

Examples of activities

Page 6: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Prevailing science directions and new projects

Major Themes• Remote sensing

• Ecosystem services

• Land change science

Regional Initiatives• Flood inundation• Conservation tools• Urban watersheds• Irrigated agriculture

National/global remote sensing products help managers take a broader view but must apply to resource decisions made at regional-to-local scales to be of maximum benefit.

Banshee Reeks, Loudon Co., VA; percent canopy cover from the 2001 National Land Cover Database

Page 7: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Prevailing science directions and new projects

Specific program in Climate and Land Use Change

Need for understanding land use/cover change is important to all mission areas

• Drivers/causes of landscape change

• Trends in landscape change

• Consequences of change

• Modeling land change

• Developing plausible scenarios of future landscapes

Land Change Science

Page 8: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Prevailing science directions and new projects

Land use as a BMP Urban BMPs Agricultural BMPs

Ecosystem Services

Page 9: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Prevailing science directions and new projects

Develop techniques specifically for fire scar, burn severity and recovery mapping in wetland environments

Develop software for metric derivation to compare various satellite products over Eastern U.S. forests

Use lidar measured canopy heights to evaluate heights modeled by NLCD class (used in stream temperature modeling)

Test importance of Landsat atmospheric calibration for surface water inundation mapping

Assess how easily Landsat ECV cal/val data can be affectively generated “automatically”

Investigating the breadth of hyperspectral imaging utility in land change research

Remote Sensing

Page 10: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Prevailing science directions and new projects

Web-enabling FEMA’s HAZUS flood loss assessment software for FIM

Using remote sensing to identify and monitor irrigated lands in the particularly challenging Eastern US

1/23/10 3/19/10 4/04/10 4/20/10 7/12/105/07/10

Regional Initiatives

Page 11: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Web-based tool for Flood risk analysis

Web-enables FEMA’s HAZUS flood loss assessment software

A component of the USGS Flood Inundation Mapping Initiative

Cooperators:• Water, Hazards, CLU mission

areas

• WSCs nationwide

• Federal Emergency Management Administration

• National Weather Service

• Cities of Albany, GA, and Nashville, TN

Inter-center and cross-mission collaboration

Page 12: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Leadership in partnerships and alliances outside the USGS Leadership in partnerships and alliances outside the USGS

The Implications of Land Use, Cover, and Management Change in the

Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Mapping and Monitoring Landscape

Characteristics

Forecasting Urban Land Use/Cover

Change

Effects of Impervious Surface Patterns on

Stream Flow

Effects of Agricultural

Conservation Practices on Water Quality

Effects of Stormwater Management Practices

on Water Quality

Geospatial Support for Conservation and Restoration

Decisions

Web-based Application

Development for Adaptive Management

Coordination of Climate Science

Chesapeake Bay Stat

Chesapeake Bay Program

Page 13: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Science communication and impact

Page 14: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Science communication and impact

Primary products are RGE/EDGE produced journal articles and USGS reports 37 products to include news items, advice, journal papers,

USGS publications, book chapters, maps 7 workshops and working group participation 32 lectures, briefings, training sessions 5 proposals (2 wins)

Deliver products to partners as a result of collaborative agreements (e.g., CBP conservation tool development, Anacostia watershed tool, FEMA HAZUZ, land cover future scenarios)

Principal partner of products (all CBP members, FEMA, CLUC) Land cover futures key to EPA TMDL regulations Contract staff key to web tools

Page 15: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Linking biophysical process information with site-specific knowledge of the landscape (remote sending and data integration)

High resolution mapping of land use, agricultural management, conservation program information; extensive water and air quality monitoring

Lidar DEM, wetness indices, radar/LIDAR mapping of wetland processes linking vegetation response parameters to landscape mapped variability

Landscape effects on water quality, Eastern Shore, MD (Choptank CEAP)

Science communication and impact

Page 16: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Science communication and impact

Page 17: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Science communication and impact

Page 18: Agenda  Science center operation Structure Planning Review Reporting

Questions/Comments

http://www.usgs.gov

http://egsc.usgs.gov