Case # 603FSignificance & Compatibility

Review711 Evans Ave.

Presented By: Jason LutzCommunity Development Services Director

City Council MeetingAgenda Item #7

December 14, 2015

CASE NO. 603F Consider a request of Request of Catherine

Nored Architect, representing David and BeckySimpson, owners, for the significance andcompatibility review of the proposedreplacement structure located at 711 EvansAve under Demolition Review Ordinance No.1860 (April 12, 2010) in order to encapsulate100% of the existing exterior facing walls andencapsulate 52% of the front-facing facade toreplace the existing exterior finish materialsand construct a new front porch.

SUMMARY The applicant is seeking to encapsulate the

existing brick home with stucco and add afront porch (8’ 6” x 27’ 6”), as well as, replacetwo existing widows with French doors andremove/infill one existing double hungwindow.

The proposed modifications have triggeredARB/Council review.

4

BACKGROUND

Legal Description (LOTS 13 & 14,BLOCK 176, CB 4024)

The property is zoned SF-A and islocated on the north side of EvansAve., between Ciruela St. and LovetaSt.

5

PROJECT LOCATION

6

POLICY ANALYSISLOT COVERAGE EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 15,000 15,000Main House Footprint 2,800 2,800Front Porch 0 238Side Porch 1 0 0Side Porch 2 0 0Rear Porch 0 0Garage Footprint 0 0Carport Footprint 925 925Shed(s) Footprint 0 0Breezeways 0 0Covered Patio Structure 0 0Other Accessory Structures 0 0Lot Coverage / Lot Area 3,725/15,000 3,963/15,000Total Lot Coverage (Max 40%) 25% 26%

7

POLICY ANALYSIS

FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR) EXISTING PROPOSED

Lot Area 15,000 15,000

Main House 1st Floor 2,800 3,038

Main House 2nd Floor 0 0

Garage 1st Floor 0 0

Garage 2nd Floor 0 0

Other Structures 0 0

FAR / Lot Area 2,800/15,000 3,038/15,000

Total FAR (45% or 50% with bonus) 19% 20%

8

POLICY ANALYSIS The proposed addition (porch) complies

with the required front & side yard setbacks. The proposed addition (porch) will have a

standing seam metal roof to match theexisting home and painted wood columns.

The existing home was built in 1949 andstaff has found no historical significanceconcerning the architectural style or a notedarchitect of record.

9

SITEPLAN

10

PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION

11

PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION

12

13

14

15

16

17

ARB RECOMMENDATION

On November 17, 2015 the ARBreviewed the case, found nosignificance in the existing structure,found the proposed modifications to becompatible, and approved the request.

18

PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Postcards were mailed to property owners

within a 200-foot radius of the property,appropriate notice was posted on the Citywebsite and a sign was posted on theproperty

Responses received:

Support: (6)

Oppose: (0)

QUESTIONS?