P L E A S E U S E T H I S V E R S I O N F O R P R O J E C T S S E L E C T E D I N 2018 O R E A R L I E R

APEC Project Completion ReportSECTION A: Project profile

Project number & title: PPFS 05 2018 - Strengthening Rural Areas as a contribution to Food Security in the Asia-Pacific region

Project time period: January 2019 – December 2019

Date submitted:

14 October 2019

Committee / WG / Fora:

Policy Partnership on Food Security (PPFS)

Project Overseer Name / Organization /

Economy:

José Luis Romero / Bureau of Agricultural Studies and Policies / Chile

SECTION B: Project report and reflection

1. Project description: In 3-4 sentences, please describe the project and its main objectives.

Five experts where mean to share their knowledge and experience on five different themes: rural policies and the new paradigm, economic dynamism in the rural territory, fostering sustainable development in the rural areas, culture and rural identity relevance, and the Italian experience on rural development. And all the economies member where invited to share their rural experience.The project seeks to promote collaboration and knowledge sharing on specific issues related to the development of rural areas in the context of rural-urban linkages and its contribution to food security.

2. Meeting objectives: Describe how the project met each of its proposed objectives. Please outline any challenges you may have encountered in delivering the activity.

First, the participants listen to the knowledge of all the five experts in the different themes named before. Then they listen to the experiences of all the economy member that where in the activity.With all of this learn contents, an intensive workshop was developed by the contractor, encouraging everyone to participate. The participants learn a lot of each other experiences, and they have space to share between them the learnings and feelings of the workshop. They took a lot of dreams, ideas and challenges to their home.

3. Evaluation: Describe the process undertaken to evaluate the project upon completion. (e.g. evaluation through participant surveys, peer reviews of outputs, assessments against indicators, statistics demonstrating use of outputs etc.). Provide analysis of results of evaluations conducted and where possible include information on impacts on gender. How has the project contributed to APEC’s capacity building goals, objectives and operational principles? Evaluation data needs to be included as an appendix.

The survey suggestion was not used, instead a different survey was applied, that was made by Mentimeter. Mentimeter is a website that allows the audience to use their smartphones to connect the presentation and answer questions, give feedback, and more; showing their responses in real-time, creating a fun and interactive experience.The details are in the Appendix 4, but the principal results of the evaluation were:

1. In the general aspects, the activities were evaluated with a 4.32, in a range from 1 to 5. Sowing a positive response.

2. The participants were very satisfied with the methodology developed, and we achieved the objective of sharing experiences and knowledge. Also, they were satisfied with the facilitator team.

3. Finally, they asked to include a field trip in a future activity, and to make shorter days.

4. Output indicators: Describe the main project outputs below. This may include workshops, tools, research papers, reports, recommendations, best practices, action plans..

Indicators (Edit or Insert rows as needed)

# planned# actualDetails or notes

# workshops / events 3 3 The planned activities were a conference, a panel, and a

workshop. All of them were completed.

Indicators (Edit or Insert rows as needed)

# planned# actualDetails or notes

# participants (M/F) 40 178

16 of them were delegates of other economies, 40 were chilean delegates, and the other ones were invited. Only the delegates participated of the workshop.76 were women, and 107 were men.

# economies attending 10 67 The economies attending were: Philippines, Thailand, USA,

New Zealand, Viet Nam, Peru # speakers

engaged 6 5 We have the other speaker, but he cancelled his participation at last minute.

# other organizations

engaged0 0

# publications distributed

1 1

Strengthening Rural Areas as a Contribution to Food Security in the Asia-Pacific Regionhttps://www.apec.org/Publications/2019/10/Strengthening-Rural-Areas-as-a-Contribution-to-Food-Security-in-the-Asia-Pacific-Region

# recommendation

s agreed on 0 0

Other:

Comments:

5. Outcomes: Describe any specific medium-term changes to policy, processes or behaviour that can be attributed to result from this activity. Please include details on: What indicators were used to measure medium-term impact? (Example indicators:

type/number of policies/ regulations/processes changed, % of businesses conforming to new standards, change in sector’s commercial activity, # individual action plans developed, # agencies using resource or tools etc.)

How capacity has been built through the project. Monitoring plans in place and proposed indicators to measure impacts, including any

impacts on gender. Please summarise relevant information.

The outputs concluded were:

- The conference, panel and workshop, developed during 20 and 21 June 2019.- The final report with the main results and conclusions of the activities developed, that was published in October

2019. http://apec.org/Publications/2019/10/Strengthening-Rural-Areas-as-a-Contribution-to-Food-Security-in-the-Asia-Pacific-Region

- The publication in ODEPA’s website of the activity. https://www.odepa.gob.cl/desarrollo-rural/seminario-internacional-organizado-por-apec-y-odepa-llevo-la-discusion-sobre-la-ruralidad-a-una-de-las-regiones-mas-rurales-de-chile

- The publication of all the pictures in ODEPA’s facebook. https://www.facebook.com/pg/odepa.minagri/photos/?tab=album&album_id=2244829912220939

During the activities, the delegates, experts and participants shared experiences, and could know more about rural policies in other economies. It was also an important creation of network; the New Zealand delegation planned future meetings with the US delegation, and the Peruvian delegate also planned a future meeting with a Chilean delegate.

6. Participants/ Speakers Summary Table (compulsory for events): Must be gender-disaggregated.

Economy(Insert rows as needed) # male # female Total

New Zealand 1 4 5

Philippines 1 1 2

Thailand 1 1 2

USA 2 2 4

Viet Nam 0 2 2

Peru 1 0 1Chilean Delegates and Participants 64 98 162

Speakers 3 2 5

Comments: What was the approach undertaken for participant nomination/selection and targeting? Please provide details. What follow-up actions are expected? How will participants/beneficiaries continue to be engaged and supported to progress this work?

The approach for the participants nomination was representatives related with the rural development, of public and private sector.In relation to the follow-up actions, we send the presentations and pictures, to all the delegates. Also, we have a publication in APEC website that we are hoping it will be useful for other economies.

7. Key findings: Describe 1-3 examples of key findings, challenges or success stories arising from the project (e.g. research or case studies results, policy recommendations, roadblocks to progress on an issue, impacts on gender).

The most important findings of the workshop were the common challenges identified:

1. Opportunities for collaboration between APEC economies:- Assessment of political dynamics in APEC economies.- How to encourage public-private partnerships in rural development.- Fostering cooperation between rural people from different economies.2. Focus on demographic segments:- Fostering and prioritising the development of indigenous/tribal groups/ethnic minority people in

rural areas.- Empowering rural based women in their families and communities.- Keeping youth in rural areas with a purpose + economic viability through entrepreneurship.3. Urban-rural dynamics:- Migration between rural and urban: want or need?- Understand urban-rural connections to improve policies that seek to improve the quality of life.4. Climate change:- Water.5. Reflection about policy planning:- There is never time for good planning and execution, but we spend lots of time and resources

trying to fix the unfixable.

And finally, the next steps proposed for the working groups during the workshop.

1. Assessment of political dynamics in APEC economies.- Think of the future of the economy- “Go beyond politics”- Case studies must contextualize the political dynamics of each economy- Asses internal dynamics- Move from “shopping list” to domestically determined crafting of programs- Policies that transcend politicians2. How to encourage public-private partnerships in rural development.- Joint planning- Responsibility sharing- Big farming groups- Contract farming3. Fostering cooperation between rural people from different economies.- Use technology to communicate between economies (Idea: social media to make virtual

communities digital)4. Fostering and prioritising the development of indigenous/tribal groups/ethnic minority people in

rural areas.- Diagnosis/assessment of current state- Language/definition- Incentives- A thousand cups of tea- Indigenous community involvement/led in whole process5. Empowering rural based women in their families and communities.- Better/specialized jobs in rural areas...but how?- Rural-based investment and economic development- Long-term projects and multigeneration thinking6. Keeping youth in rural areas with a purpose + economic viability through entrepreneurship.- Connecting entrepreneurs - Young farmers

- Sharing stories, models, experiences (eg innovation centres)- Connecting urban universities to rural-distance learning “Future farmers of the APEC world”- Sharing of traditional/indigenous knowledge/practices/products. With a view to product

development, commercialisation and intellectual property-Networking- Agricultural programmes fostering entrepreneurship7. Migration between rural and urban: want or need?- Better/specialized jobs in rural areas...but how?- Rural-based investment and economic development- Long-term projects and multigeneration thinking8. Understand urban-rural connections to improve policies that seek to improve the quality of life.- Studying urban-rural connections- Improve connectivity between rural and urban areas (transportation, roads, internet … etc)- Permeate/publicize this new view at a domestic, regional and local level. Rural areas as places

that constantly grow/transform9. Water.- Rationing- Assessing the current situation- Changing habits (personal, local and political/government)- Innovation/new technologies to address water issues- Finding means to generate potable water- Differentiate water use (potable/commercial/industrial)- Filtration systems to produce potable water10. There is never time for good planning and execution, but we spend lots of time and resources

trying to fix the unfixable.- Markets- Strategic partnerships- Production partnerships- Future vision - Technological transference - Responsibility: with the use of resources and with the results.

8. Next steps: Describe any planned follow-up steps or projects, such as workshops, post-activity evaluations, or research to assess the impact of this activity. How will the indicators from Question 5 be tracked? How will this activity inform any future APEC activities?

The rural development department of ODEPA, is constantly developing activities related with the topics of this activities. We have all the participants contacts, and we created good networks, and, we have meet with some of them in other conferences. For example, New Zealand developed a workshop in Puerto Varas, Chile; we meet Bette Brand in the 12th OECD Rural Development Conference, and we share with Enrique Garcilazo and other economies, in the OECD annual meeting of the Rural Working Party.Finally, we hope to develop another seminar, like this one, and continue working with the delegates.

9. Feedback for the Secretariat: Do you have suggestions for more effective support by APEC fora or the Secretariat? Any assessment of consultants, experts or other stakeholders to share? The Secretariat examines feedback trends to identify ways to improve our systems.

The secretariat was very helpful, and always available to answer our questions and doubts. The only complication we have was the time difference, that makes the communication difficult and slower.

P L E A S E U S E T H I S V E R S I O N F O R P R O J E C T S S E L E C T E D I N 2018 O R E A R L I E R

SECTION C: Budget

Attach a detailed breakdown of the APEC- provided project budget, including: Planned costs: (using most recently approved budget figures) Actual expenditures Variance notes: An explanation of any budget line under- or over-spent by 20% or more.

All Figures in USD # of Units Unit Rate

Planned costs Actual expenditures

% Variance Variance notesAPEC Funding

Self-Funding

APEC Funding Self-Funding

Direct Labour

Speaker’s Honorarium (government officials ineligible) 3 speakers 1.500 4.500 0 0 0 -100%

The variance was given because none of the speakers asked for honorarium payment. They just

needed the travel and per-diem to be paid.

Short-term clerical fees

(please provide details of scope of work and deliverables in Budget Note 1 - Direct Labour)

(# of hours) 0 0 0 0 0 0%

Contractor fees

(contractors Secretary’s fees to be included in cost and packaged together)

 

400 hours 50 0 20.000  0 20.000  0%  

500 hours 40 20.000 0  19.257 0  -3,72%

The variance was given by the exchange rate changes of the

budget.

 

Travel (Speaker, Experts, Researchers)

Per diem (incl. accommodation and “75% additional payment”)

6 speakers, 3.75 days.

306 6.885 0  3.016 0  -56,19%

The variance is result of one less speaker, and one day less spend

in the seminar, by one of the speakers.

Airfare 6 speakers 4.000 24.000 0  2.273,64 0  -90,53%

The variance is result of two speakers that did not need airfare, because they were Chilean, and

travelled by car.

Travel for Participants (from travel-eligible economies only. Active participants only)

Per diem (incl. accommodations and “75% additional payment”)

20 participants, 3.75 days

306 22.950  0 6.090 0  -73,46% The variance is explained because, from the 20 participants expected, only 7 finally arrived at the Seminar and the airfare costs

were below to the estimated Airfare (restricted economy class) 20 participants, 20

round-trip tickets   68.000 0 29.466,21 0 -56,67%

Other items

Hosting (provide breakdown, e.g., room rental, stationery) 2 day seminar 10.000  20.000 0  12.291,20 0  -39%

 The hosting costs were below the prices we estimated.

Total:   166.335 20.000 72.394,05 20.000 -52%  

P L E A S E U S E T H I S V E R S I O N F O R P R O J E C T S S E L E C T E D I N 2018 O R E A R L I E R

SECTION D: Appendices

Please attach the following documentation to the report. Note that the contact list for participants/ experts/ consultants is a mandatory requirement for all Project Completion Reports.

Appendices Notes Participant contact list, including name, email address, gender,

organization (mandatory) Experts / consultants list, including name, email address, gender,

organization (mandatory) Event Agenda Reports, websites or resources created: links or soft copies The links are included

in the point 5.

Post activity survey or other evaluation data (raw and/or aggregated)

The raw information will be attached in the e-mail. Aggregated information is included in the appendix.

Other information or resources FOR APEC SECRETARIAT USE ONLY APEC comments: Were APEC project guidelines followed? Could the project have been managed more effectively or easily by the PO?

P L E A S E U S E T H I S V E R S I O N F O R P R O J E C T S S E L E C T E D I N 2018 O R E A R L I E R

Appendix 1Participant contact list, including name, email address, gender, organization (mandatory)

# First Name Last Name Email Address M/F Speaker/Expert or Participant

Economy Organization

1 Lev Nikko Macalintal nixmacalintal@gmail.com M Participant Philippines Department of Agriculture

2 Toni Marcel Rimando tonirimando@gmail.com F Participant Philippines Department of Agriculture

3 Poomisakdi Rasri rasrisak@hotmail.com M Participant Thailand Office of Agricultural Economics

4 Panee Boonyaguakul paneeboon@yahoo.com F Participant Thailand Department of Agriculture Extension

5 Abigail Rockwell rockwella@state.gov F Participant USA US Department of State

6 Andrew Shaeffer andrew.shaeffer@usda.gov M Participant USA Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA

7 Nelson Ramirez Nelson.Ramirez@fas.usda.gov M Participant USA Office of Agricultural Affairs (FAS-USDA), US. Embassy

8 Bette Brand bette.brand@usda.gov F Participant USA Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA

9 Shontelle Bishara bishs@tpk.govt.nz F Participant New Zealand Te Puni Kokiri

10 Jared Pitman pitmj@tpk.govt.nz M Participant New Zealand Te Puni Kokiri

11 Nicole Nepe nepen@tpk.govt.nz F Participant New Zealand Te Puni Kokiri

12 Keri Iti keri.iti@mpi.govt.nz F Participant New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries

13 Annette Gittos annette.gittos@mpi.govt.nz F Participant New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries

14 Vo Thi Quynh Nga asemhanoi2013@gmail.com F Participant Viet Nam International Cooperation Department, MARD

15 Truong Thi Thu Trang trangmymy@gmail.com F Participant Viet NamInstitute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development

16 Lincoln Marcelo Onofre Lagos lmonofre@minagri.gob.pe M Participant Peru Ministry of Agriculture and Irrigation

17 Nuri Gras nuri.gras@achipia.gob.cl F Participant Chile Achipia

18 Daniela Villanueva dvillanueva@odepa.gob.cl F Participant Chile Odepa

19 Mónica Rodríguez monica.rodriguez@cnr.gob.cl F Participant Chile Comisión Nacional de Riego

20 Patricio López plopezb@gmail.com M Participant Chile Ministerio de las Culturas, Artes y el Patrimonio

21 Paulina Contreras Hurtado pcontreras@odepa.gob.cl F Participant Chile Odepa

22 Paloma Caro paloma.caro@odepa.gob.cl F Participant Chile Odepa

23 Yenifer Aguilera Muñoz fomentoproductivo@munininhue.cl F Participant Chile Municipalidad de Ninhue

24 Eduardo Becker Marshall ciren@ciren.cl M Participant Chile Ciren

25 Alberto Valdes avaldese@uc.cl M Participant Chile Odepa

26 Magdalena Traub maletraub@gmail.com F Participant Chile Seremía Hacienda

27 Carlos felipe Orellana Rojas corellanar@indap.cl M Participant Chile Indap

28 Tatiana Merino tmerino@indap.cl F Participant Chile Indap

29 Fernando Ulloa Rojas fernando.ulloa@goredenuble.cl M Participant Chile Gobierno Regional Ñuble

30 Heidi Inostroza hinostroza@minenergia.cl F Participant Chile Ministerio de Energia

31 Josefa Cuesta jcuesta@indap.cl F Participant Chile Indap

32 Juan Garcia jgarcia@indap.cl M Participant Chile Indap

33 Ingrid Quezada iquezada@prochile.gob.cl F Participant Chile ProChile

34 Juan luis Enríquez jenriquez@indap.cl M Participant Chile Indap

35 Gabriela Alejandra Navarrete Claveria gnavarrete@prodemu.cl F Participant Chile Prodemu

36 Victor Vargas vvargas@infor.cl M Participant Chile Infor

37 Leonardo Sotomayor Sanzana lsotomayors@gmail.com M Participant Chile Odepa

38 Eduardo Caro eduardo.caro@conaf.cl M Participant Chile Conaf

39 Maia Guiskin mguiskin@odepa.gob.cl F Participant Chile Odepa

40 Ricardo Asfura insunza ricardoasfurai@gmail.com M Participant Chile Municipalidad de San Carlos

41 Eliecer Edmundo Gonzalez Barrientos eligob@live.com M Participant Chile

42 Jeanette Oehrens jeanette.oehrens@gmail.com F Participant Chile

43 Jaime Ovalle jovalle@odepa.gob.cl M Participant Chile Odepa

44 Fernando Barraza fernandobarrazamiranda@gmail.com M Participant Chile

45 Martín Arrau marrau@interior.gob.cl M Participant Chile Intendencia Ñuble

46 María Emilia Undurraga mundurraga@odepa.gob.cl F Participant Chile Odepa

47 José Luis Romero jromero@odepa.gob.cl M Participant Chile Odepa

48 Josefina Montero jmontero@odepa.gob.cl F Participant Chile Odepa

49 Matías Brahm mbrahm@odepa.gob.cl M Participant Chile Odepa

50 Ricardo Prado Cuevas rprado@agroseguros.gob.cl M Participant Chile Agroseguros

51 Daniela Álvarez dalvarez@asociacion.cl F Participant Chile Asprocer

52 Juan Carlos Domínguez jcdominguez@asociacion.cl M Participant Chile Asprocer

53 Carolina González Moreno cgonzalez@acercaredes.org F Participant Chile Acerca Redes

54 Edmundo Varas evarasbordeu@gmail.com M Participant Chile Surinnova Consultores

55 Erika Lamig Fritz Seygeagro@gmail.com F Participant Chile Seygeagro

56 Fernando David Pinto Morales fernandopinto@unach.cl M Participant Chile Universidad Adventista de Chile

57 Hugo Acevedo hugoacevedovet@gmail.com M Participant Chile Instituto Ifosana

58 Rodrigo Garcia Rodrigogarciaha@gmail.com M Participant Chile RIMISP

59 José de la Cruz Lara Verdugo any.arroyo@gmail.com M Participant Chile Comunidad de Aguas Vista Hermosa

60 Manuel Pedro Faúndez mfaundez@udec.cl M Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción

61 Rodrigo Avilés raviles@inia.cl M Participant Chile Inia

62 Marcela Ledesma Mledesma@gmail.com F Participant Chile Copelec

63 M. Cecilia Varas Benavente mvaras@prodemu.cl F Participant Chile Prodemu

64 Daniel Rey Pozo drey@agrariacorporacion.cl M Participant Chile Corporación Agraria

65 Carlos Smith Croxatto Carlos.smith.c@gmail.com M Participant Chile Aprocarne Ñuble

66 Ernesto Eguiluz ernestoeguiluz@gmail.com M Participant Chile Fedearroz

67 Carlos Ruiz cruiz@inia.cl M Participant Chile Inia

68 Daniela Silva Secre.dinamarcacore@gmail.com M Participant Chile Consejo Regional de Ñuble

69 Gonzalo Alejandro Chandia Tolosa Gonzalo@riverasdelchillan.cl M Participant Chile Viña Riveras del Chillán

70 Rodrigo Muñoz rodrigo.munoz@codesser.cl M Participant Chile Codesser

71 Jesus Paredes Calderon jesus.awkan@gmail.com M Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción

72 Julián Caviedes julian.caviedes@fao.org M Participant Chile FAO

73 Jaime Solano jsolano@uct.cl M Participant Chile Universidad Católica de Temuco

74 Haydee Parra hayparram@gmail.com F Participant Chile Sello Sustentable

75 Paola del Carmen Bustamante Quilodran Pabusquil@hotmail.com F Participant Chile Agrícola VyP

76 Yessica Salvadores Ysalvadores@inia.cl F Participant Chile Inia

77 Victor Kramm VKRAMM@INIA.CL M Participant Chile Inia

78 Oscar Roberto Avendaño Arriagada o.avendano.arriagada@gmail.com M Participant Chile -

79 Viviana Becerra vbecerra@inia.cl F Participant Chile Inia

80 Gabriel Donoso gabriel.donoso@inia.cl M Participant Chile Inia

81 Henry Gajardo hsanhueza@ucsc.cl M Participant Chile Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción

82 Domingo Sáez Beltrán wsaez@ubiobio.cl M Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio

83 Rodrigo Díaz rodrigo.diaz@inia.cl M Participant Chile Inia

84 Marcelino Claret Merino mclaret@inia.cl M Participant Chile Inia

85 Nidia Casas Forero nidiacf@gmail.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio

86 Cristobal Bustamante cbustamante8@santotomas.cl M Participant Chile Universidad Santo Tomás

87 Marcela Leal lealmarcel@gmail.com F Participant Chile Unión Comunal de Agua Potable Rural San Nicolás

88 María Gabriela Quintana Alarcón mgabriela.quintanaa@gmail.com F Participant Chile Comisión Nacional de Riego

89 Sergio Brevis agricolaelcarmenltda@gmail.com M Participant Chile Agrícola El Carmen

90 Rodrigo Aranis rodrigo.aranis@gmail.com M Participant Chile EGT Rodrigo Aranis EIRL

91 Jeannette Calvet Jeannette_calvet@hotmail.com F Participant Chile Acosoc Ñuble

92 Paulina Saravia paulina.saravia@codesser.cl F Participant Chile Codesser

93 Ana María Soto Arias anasoto@santotomas.cl F Participant Chile Universidad Santo Tomás

94 Eve Crowley fao-chl@fao.org F Participant Chile FAO

95 Katy Castellanos kmarce_19@yahoo.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio

96 Barbara Gonzalez barbara.gonzalez.ic@gmail.com F Participant Chile Universidad Santo Tomás

97 Juan Carlos Arriagada Acuña codemact@gmail.com M Participant ChileCorporación Observatorio del Mercado Alimentario (CODEMA)

98 Loren Paola Macias Bu lorenmacias614@yahoo.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio

99 Maria Soledad Valenzuela svalenzuela@aaci.cl F Participant Chile Asesorías Agroalimentarias y Comercio Internacional10

0 Gloria Sánchez Sandoval glsanchez@gmail.com F Participant Chile Colegio de Nutricionistas Filial Ñuble

10 Daisy Mora Alvial yoisa2010@live.cl F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio

110

2 Carlos Ruiz ruizc.carlos@gmail.com M Participant Chile Centro Regional Estudios Ambientales UCSC10

3 Danilo Fabián Gajardo Hernández danilogajardo22@yahoo.es M Participant Chile Federación La Conquista Campesina de Ñuble10

4 Oscar Melo omelo@uc.cl M Participant Chile Universidad Católica de Chile10

5 Rodolfo Campos rodolfo.campos@fia.cl M Participant Chile Fundación para la Innovación Agraria10

6 Siegried Lillo Siegriedlillo@gmail.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio10

7 Guisella Tobar guisellapatty@gmail.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio10

8 Gustavo Mendez nuble@fedefruta.cl M Participant Chile Fedefruta10

9 María Estuardo Guerra Valle maria.guerra1601@alumnos.ubiobio.cl F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio11

0 Francisco Guajardo franciscoguajardo@chileorganic.cl M Participant Chile Chile Organica11

1 Nailin Carvajal Mena nailincm@gmail.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio11

2 Belissa Cochachin Carrera belisacc23@hotmail.com F Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio11

3 Alvaro Gatica Perez agaticap@gmail.com M Participant Chile Asociación de Agricultores11

4 Alvaro Castro acastro@huellalocal.cl M Participant Chile Fundación Huella Local11

5 Diego Schachner diego@balloonlatam.com M Participant Chile Balloon Latam11

6 Roberto Muñoz secanomiel@gmail.com M Participant Chile Secanomiel11

7 Andrés Castillo andresacastillo@gmail.com M Participant Chile Viitacoop Chile11

8 Karla Cordero kcordero@inia.cl F Participant Chile Inia11 Victor Toledo victorstoledoc@gmail.com M Participant Chile Marrón Andino SPA

912

0 Veronica Agustina Cuevas Morales Veronica_Cuevas@Prodemu.Cl F Participant Chile Prodemu12

1 Alberto Avila Aavila@Infor.Cl M Participant Chile Infor12

2 Julieth Galdames Jugaldames@Udec.Cl F Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción12

3 Andres Mellado Amellado@Acercaredes.Org M Participant Chile Acerca Redes12

4 Javier Iván Leiva Vega Javier.Leiva.Vega@Gmail.Com M Participant Chile -12

5 Claudio Aguilera caguile3@bancoestado.cl M Participant Chile Banco Estado12

6 Nelson Badilla Rojas nelpachile@hotmail.com M Participant Chile 12

7 Carolina Castillo ccastillos@inacap.cl F Participant Chile Inacap12

8 Claudia Chiang cchiang@balloonlatam.com F Participant Chile Balloon Latam12

9 Jose Regino Escobar Concha donginito2@hotmail.com M Participant Chile 13

0 Luz Carolina Fernández Poblete lfernandez@virginiogomez.cl F Participant Chile 13

1 Maria Francisca Luco Quintana uigpchillan@udec.cl F Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción13

2 Alfonso Maturana Alfonso.maturana@comfrut.com M Participant Chile Comfrut13

3 Francisco Puig franciscopuig@hotmail.com M Participant Chile 13

4 Sandra Quilodrán rayenquilodran@gmail.com F Participant Chile 13

5 Marcelo Sánchez hsanche4@bancoestado.cl M Participant Chile Banco Estado13

6 Claudia Tramón cltramon@udec.cl F Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción13 Gutemberg Villarroel gutemberg.villarroel.b@gmail.com M Participant Chile

713

8 Carolina Lagos Bravo carolagos26@gmail.com F Participant Chile 13

9 Felipe Torres Sepúlveda felipe.torres@ascc.cl M Participant Chile Asesorías Agroalimentarias y Comercio Internacional14

0 Margarita Lara sol.larav.marg@gmail.com F Participant Chile 14

1 Bladimir Sandoval Ortizbsando60@microempresas.bancoestado.cl M Participant Chile Banco Estado

142 Claudia Moreno Martínez

cmoren61@microempresas.bancoestado.cl F Participant Chile Banco Estado

143 Enrique Parada Orellana

eparad60@microempresas.bancoestado.cl M Participant Chile Banco Estado

144 Roger Cisterna Rondanelli rcisterna@economia.cl M Participant Chile Ministerio de Economia

145 Oscar Crisostomo Llanos seguridadpublica@chillanviejo.cl M Participant Chile Municipalidad Chillán Viejo

146 Anyel Kuschel akuschel@prochile.gob.cl M Participant Chile ProChile

147 Rodrigo Orrego rodrigo.orrego@minagri.gob.cl M Participant Chile Seremía Agricultura

148 Cristian Pavez Carrasco cpavezddr@gmail.com M Participant Chile

149 Ramón Troncoso ratroncoso@hotmail.com M Participant Chile

150 Patricio Riveros priveros@odepa.gob.cl M Participant Chile Odepa

151 Oriana Betancourt obetanco@uct.cl F Participant Chile Universidad Católica de Temuco

152 Felipe Pincheira felipe@cavassubmarinas.com M Participant Chile Cavas Submarinas

153 Luis Bravo lbravom@indap.cl M Participant Chile Indap

154 José Rojas jrcontacto@freego.cl M Participant Chile Freego

15 Juan Saavedra bioprocesos.js@gmai.clm M Participant Chile

515

6 Anali Rosas arosas@udec.cl F Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción15

7 Daniel Andrades Dandrades@sernapesca.cl M Participant Chile SernaPesca15

8 Marcia Ortiz mortizramiro@yahoo.es F Participant Chile 15

9 Aurara Larrere ALARRERE@GMAIL.COM F Participant Chile 16

0 Jose Mendez jose.mendez@inia.cl M Participant Chile Inia16

1 Pablo Jimenez correoniquen@yahoo.com M Participant Chile Indap 16

2 Rodrigo Dinamarca dinamarcacore@gmail.com M Participant Chile 16

3 Pablo Neira raulapicola@hotmail.com M Participant Chile 16

4 Vivianne Palma vivianne.palma@caideschile.com F Participant Chile Centro Avanzado Internacional en Desarrollo Sostenible16

5 Carolina Navarrete cnavarreter@mbienes.cl F Participant Chile Ministerio de Bienes Nacionales16

6 Mabel San Martín pavelnovios F Participant Chile 16

7 Andrés Nello andresnello@gmail.com M Participant Chile 16

8 Juan Mellado jmellado@yahoo.com M Participant Chile 16

9 Susana Fischer sfischer@udec.cl F Participant Chile Universidad de Concepción17

0 Osvaldo Caro Caro clases.caro@gmail.com M Participant Chile 17

1 Laura Mota laura.mota@gmail.com F Participant Chile 17

2 Claudio Soto claudiosoto@ussc.cl M Participant Chile 17 Fernando Borquez ruy.borquez@minagri.gob.cl M Participant Chile Seremía Agricultura Ñuble

317

4 Carlos Quezada Celerino cequezada@udec.cl M Participant Chile 17

5 Luis Antonio Arriagada Vallejos arriagadavallejos@gmail.com M Participant Chile -17

6 Jorge Moreno jomoreno@ubiobio.cl M Participant Chile Universidad del Biobio17

7 Gonzalo Rueda grueda@fia.cl M Participant Chile Fundación para la Innovación Agraria17

8 Andres Aruas andresaa@hotmail.com M Participant Chile

Appendix 2Experts / consultants list, including name, email address, gender, organization (mandatory)

# First Name Last Name Email Address M/F Speaker/Expert or Participant

Economy Organization

1 Jose Enrique Garcilazo JoseEnrique.GARCILAZO@oecd.org M Speaker Spain OECD

2 Kelly Barry Kelly.Barry@ngaitahu.iwi.nz F Speaker New Zealand Ngai Tahu

3 Alejandra Engler mengler@utalca.cl F Speaker Chile Universidad de Talca

4 Gonzalo Valdivieso gonzalovaldivieso@uc.cl M Speaker Chile Universidad Católica de Chile

5 Marco Leonetti m.leonetti@stud.iuav.it M Speaker Italy Strategia Nazionale Aree Interne

P L E A S E U S E T H I S V E R S I O N F O R P R O J E C T S S E L E C T E D I N 2018 O R E A R L I E R

Appendix 3Event Agenda

Appendix 4Post Activity Survey.

The aggregated answer that we have related to the experience and the activity were the following:

1. How do you evaluate the event in which you have participated?Rate from 1 to 5, considering 1 as the worst, and 5 as excellent.

Facilitation: 4,33

Translation: 4,11

Materials and Tools: 4,33

2. What was the best of the event?

- Workshopping, trying to learn/understand español!

- The food and making new friendships.

- Getting to know each other and their experiences.

- The contribution of the facilitators.

- You facilitated the group discussion really well, so people were actively sharing ideas. I loved the visual graphics you used.

- The way the workshop was organized and facilitated. And also the participants!

- To think together about important things.

- Sharing of experiences in rural development of APEC economies.

- Group working, experiences and friendships.

- The compromise of all the participants.

- Participating people - experiences from over many economies.

- Hearing the experiences of what is happening in other economies/economies.

- Meet such different points of view in a well-organized framework.

- We have chance to get more knowledge shared by other participants.

- Workshop together and change experience different many economies.

- Some of the longer speeches, conversations, and the range of methods used to create energy and draw out our knowledge.

- All experiences.

3. What is improvable?

- Water supply during the event.

- Cultural trips may be included in the program.

- Sharing list of participants with updated contacts.

- Field trip could be in program.

- Include visit of communities/groups involved in rural development in Chile to see actual models.

- Longer workshop over more days rather than long days.

- If it is something to improve, I didn’t notice it

- Food.

- Speeches and discussions together throughout the day rather than day of speeches.

- Name tags we can easily see on.

- Time in the day for siesta.