aircraft tracking and diagnostics in c-band– added diagnostic metrics • signal dropouts and data...
TRANSCRIPT
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Aircraft Tracking and Diagnostics in C-Band
Joe Martin, NAWC-AD/AVMI, [email protected] Day, PAE/ATR, [email protected]
1
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Introduction
2
This presentation will describe the efforts of a team at NAS Patuxent River which undertook an investigation of the various factors that can affect C-Band telemetry performance when compared with traditional telemetry bands. During testing of a new C-Band telemetry datalink, differences in performance of the system under test were observed between flights at different service’s test ranges. Several C-Band specific contributing factors were examined, including relatively tighter beam widths, differing multipath effects, and the limitations of existing telemetry infrastructure. This presentation will address how these challenges were identified and analyzed, including how data was gathered from ground tracking antennas and test articles, and what quantitative analysis was performed. After this analysis, it was determined that antenna auto-tracking performance could be improved using target slaving, and this approach was put into use on the Atlantic Test Range, and has shown promising results so far.
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Challenges: Band Comparison
3
L/S – Band Characteristics • f=1-4 GHz/15-7.5 cm wavelength
• Wider RF Beam width (𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵° = 70𝜆𝜆𝑑𝑑
)
• Lower loss through cables• Longer wavelength -> less variable
peaks/nulls due to multipath• Lower attenuation over equivalent distance
C – Band Characteristics• f=4-8 GHz/7.5-3.75 cm wavelength
• Tighter RF Beam width (𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵° = 70𝜆𝜆𝑑𝑑
)
• Higher loss through cables• Shorter wavelength -> more densely
packed peaks/nulls due to multipath for a given area
• Higher attenuation over equivalent distance
Key Takeaway: C-Band receiver systems need to be more “responsive” than legacy systems did
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Challenges: Side Lobes
• Side lobe gain is sufficient to provide antenna auto-tracking lock, but provides degraded signal reception
• Size, shape, and quantity of side lobes depend on a number of factors, including antenna design and signal frequency
2
4
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Reception Diagnostic Plan
• Primary Objective:– TM in multiple bands and compare– Tracking accuracy
• Slant range• Expected power• Received power• Pointing error angle (Δ)• Slaving vs. auto-tracking
• Secondary Objectives:– Radiation pattern– Equipment diagnostics
Δ
5
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Data Sources: Aircraft
• Parameters– Latitude– Longitude– Altitude– Heading (geographic)– Attitude (pitch and roll)– Recorder Time
• Acquisition– Onboard instrumentation– Advanced Range Data
System (ARDS) pod w/ GPS downlink
6
Altitude
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Altitude
Data Sources: Antenna Control Unit (ACU)
7
• Parameters– Azimuth angle– Elevation angle– Position (altitude, latitude,
longitude)– Tracking mode (slaving,
auto-tracking, manual)– 4 channel polarized
Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) acquisition
– Built-in logging functionality (10 samples/sec)
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Calculations: Expected RSSI
• Gives notional value for Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI) at ground antenna
• Ignores some factors (antenna polarization, antenna pattern nulls, ground cable losses, etc.)
• Used to detect relative changes in signal strength, due to transient events (blockage, track loss, etc.)
• Calculated for S and C-Band signals• Validated calculation using ground tests
𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝑅𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 = 𝑃𝑃𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 − 𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 + 𝐺𝐺𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 − 𝐹𝐹𝑅𝑅𝑃𝑃𝐿𝐿 + 𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝑑𝑑
𝑃𝑃𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 = Transmitter Power𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 = Test Article Cable Loss (incl. filters, splitters, etc.)𝐺𝐺𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 = Test Article Antenna Gain𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺𝑑𝑑 = Ground Antenna Gain
FSPL = Free Space Path Loss =20 ∗ log104𝜋𝜋𝑑𝑑𝜋𝜋𝑐𝑐
d = Slant Rangef = TM Frequencyc = Speed of Light
All parameters in dBm, Meters, Hz, Seconds
8
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Calculations: Pointing Error
• Calculate correct Azimuth/Elevation angles from aircraft and antenna positions
• Find errors in antenna Az/El as separate values
• Take errors as new direction vector, and convert to Phi/Theta form
• Pointer error emerges as Theta: the angular difference between the x-axis (zero error, towards target) and the new direction vector formed from the Az/El Errors
• Implemented using MATLAB’s azel2phitheta() function
Az Error
El Error
9
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Calculations: Slant & Ground Ranges
• Geometrc Relationship – tan α = 𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒+ℎ𝑎𝑎 cos θ −(𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒)
𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒+ℎ𝑎𝑎 sin(θ)
∗(Assuming α > 0)
– 𝑠𝑠 ≈ 𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒θ– Takeaway: s < projected surface
distance
• Implemented using MATLAB’s geodetic2aer() function
*See Earth Referenced Aircraft… for derivation. 10
θ 𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒
D
ℎ𝑎𝑎
𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒
α
ψ =π2− α − θ
ψ
s =θ𝑅𝑅𝑒𝑒
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Software Workflow
Data Handling•Trimming•Sample & hold interpolation
•Time interpretation and alignment
Calculations•Slant Range•geodetic2aer()
•Phi-Theta Transfer•azel2phitheta()
•Expected RSSI
Evaluations•Mode identification•Tracking accuracy & mode intersection
Mapping•Mapping Toolbox•.Geotiff files
•Mapping•geoshow()
•Heading vectors•quiverm()
Inputs: Aircraft & Antenna
Data
Outputs: Plots & Maps
11
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flight: Degraded C-Band Datalink
12
• A customer was testing a new C-Band telemetry datalink on the Atlantic Test Range
• This datalink had previously been tested on other ranges and in a lab setting with promising results
• The performance of this datalink at ATR was different from what was expected
• The team analyzed the “over-the-air” portion of the link
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flight: RSSI Plot
13
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flight: RSSI Plot
Lobe trackingManeuver
14
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flight: RSSI Plot
15
Trending
Diverging
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flights: RSSI Plots
16
Azimuth tracking
Elevation tracking
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flights: Mapping
17
• Legend– Red: Flight path– Blue: Automatic tracking
mode, within C-Band pointing angle
– Green: Manual tracking mode, within C-Band pointing angle
– Purple: Heading arrows, taken at given intervals
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flights: Mapping
18
• Map Analysis– Manual tracking was
largely out of beam
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Initial Flights: Mapping
19
• Map Analysis– Tracking quality not
affected by geography
– Tracking quality not clearly affected by maneuver
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Follow-On: Strong C-Band Datalink
• After studying the tracking issues of the initial flight, the team decided to test “slaving” the tracking antenna to the location of the test article
• As a control, the team used conventional automatic tracking for the last portion of the flight
20
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Follow-On Flight: RSSI Plot
21
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Follow-On Flight: RSSI Plot
22
Trending
Within C-Band pointing margin
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Follow-On Flight: RSSI Plot
Trending
23
Auto-tracking undulation
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Follow-On Flight: RSSI Plots
Azimuth trackingsomewhat worse
24
Azimuth tracking
Elevation tracking
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Results: Mapping
25
• Legend– Red: Flight path– Cyan: Slaved tracking mode,
within C-Band pointing angle– Blue: Automatic tracking mode,
within C-Band pointing angle– Purple: Heading arrows, taken
at given intervals
• Map Analysis – Excellent tracking accuracy in
auto-tracking and “slaving”– No apparent dropout when
transitioning between tracking modes
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Analysis
• Test flight data supports the theory that automatic tracking locking on side lobes may be contributing to poor C-Band performance
• Antenna slaving largely eliminated tracking “wobble”• Attempts to recreate side-lobe tracking for comparison
with slaving were inconclusive• Other factors may be contributing as well (Multipath?)
26
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Survey Summary
• Expected RSSI model tracked well with measured RSSI• Saw side-lobe tracking in some situations• Tracking in azimuth found to be worse than in elevation• Tracking with geodetic slaving does not yield significantly higher
signal levels than auto-tracking under “normal” conditions• However, because of the ancillary benefits of slaving, NAS Pax
River has adopted this as a routine tracking mode, largely as a result of this survey
• Further flights are planned later this year
27
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Moving Forward
• Planned Diagnostics Improvements– Added diagnostic metrics
• Signal dropouts and data quality• Incorporation of full aircraft attitude
– 3D aircraft tracking model• Upper/Lower aircraft transmitter detection
– Improvements to RSSI model• Emission pattern simulation
– Analysis • Frequency analysis for sidelobe detection
28
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Questions
29
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
Sources of Error
• Time Cohesion– Multi source time alignment– Slave clock updating
• GPS– Accuracy & precision
• Data Analysis– Slant range– RSSI polarization synthesis
• Geodetic Model– Mercator projection– Datum plane
• Data Rates– ACU @ 10 samples/sec, – Aircraft @ ~ 20 samples/sec
30
Sampling
Propagation
NAVAIR Public Release 2019-328. Distribution Statement A – “Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited”
References
1. https://www.phys.hawaii.edu/~anita/new/papers/militaryHandbook/antennas.pdf
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_lobe3. Earth-Referenced Aircraft Navigation and Surveillance Analysis (Volpe
National Transportation System Center)4. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:F16_drawing.svg5. https://openclipart.org/detail/191682/gps-gdop-2-satellites-good
31