akerreta 2010 journal of ethnopharmacology

Upload: vierman-balweel

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    1/10

    Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / j e t h p h a r m

    Ethnoveterinary knowledge in Navarra (Iberian Peninsula)

    S. Akerreta a, M.I. Calvo b, R.Y. Cavero a,

    a Department of Plant Biology (Botany), Faculty of Sciences, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea s/n, 31008 Pamplona, Spainb Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea s/n, 31008 Pamplona, Spain

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 15 February 2010Received in revised form 4 May 2010

    Accepted 16 May 2010Available online 4 June 2010

    Keywords:

    EthnobotanyNavarraSpainMedicinal plantsEthnoveterinaryTraditional knowledge

    a b s t r a c t

    Aim of the study: To collect, analyze and evaluate the ethnoveterinary knowledge about medicinal plantsin a northern Iberian region (Navarra, 10,421km2, 620,377 inhabitants).Methodology:

    Field work was conducted between 2003 and 2007, using semi-structured questionnaireandparticipantobservationas well astransectswalks in wild herbalplant collection areas.We performedsemi-structured interviews with 667 informants (mean age 72; 55.47% women, 44.53% men) in 265locations, identified the plant reported and analyzed the results, comparing them with those from otherterritories.Results: Out of 287 species reported to be used in the health field (human and veterinary medicine), 36are linked to veterinary medicine. 69.4% of these species are new or rarely reported in veterinarian uses.The most frequently used plants were Malva sylvestris, Juglans regia and Verbena officinalis. All differentplant parts were used; aerial part was exploited more frequently than other plant parts. Most remedieslisted used a single ingredient, typically soaked in water. The route of administration was primarily oralfollowed by topical applications. These remedies are mostly for cows, calves, sheep, pigs and horses, butcover almost all domestic animal species. The main ailments treated are digestive troubles, wounds anddermatological problems, and respiratory affections.Conclusions: Thefolkknowledgeaboutmedicinalplantuse isstillalivein thestudiedregion, anda numberof scarcely reported plant uses has been detected, some of them with promising phytotherapeuticalapplications.

    2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

    1. Introduction

    Naturally derived substances of plant, animal and mineral ori-gins have provided a continuing source of medicines since theearliest times known to man (David and Anderson, 1969; Lev,2003), and their uses have been perpetuated through the use oftraditional medicines. Traditionalhuman populations have a broadnatural pharmacopoeia consisting of wild plant and animal species(Alves and Rosa, 2005, 2007).

    Medicinal plants and animals have been used in virtually allculturesasasourceofmedicine(Yinegeretal.,2007). Theuseofbio-logical resources for medicinal purposes, however, is not restrictedto human diseases treatment, being also widely used for the treat-ment of animal diseases (Lans et al., 2006; Kunwar and Bussmann,2008).

    Ethnoveterinary medicine, the scientific term for traditionalanimal health care, encompasses the knowledge, skills, methods,practices, and beliefs about animal health care found among the

    Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 48425600; fax: +34 48425649.E-mail address: [email protected](R.Y. Cavero).

    members of a community (McCorkle, 1986). The knowledge of theuse of medicinal plants and their properties was transmitted fromgeneration to generation. But this knowledge and transmission, inindustrialised countries, such as those of Western Europe, is dis-appearing quickly because of the adoption (at least partially) ofa so-called modern culture to the detriment of a traditional one,whichisconsideredinferior( EmberandEmber,1997). Thisprocess,togetherwiththeincreasingdepopulationofruralzones,hasmeantthat the passing down of customs from generation to generation isnow in imminent danger of disappearing (Anyinam, 1995).

    In the development countries, the farmers have a high spectrumin the treatment of common diseases such as diarrhoea, wounds,colds, worms, and reproductive disorders with medicinal plant.Very little of this traditional knowledge has been documented inmostofthecountries.Inrecentyears,however,increasingattentionhas been paid to ethnoveterinary knowledge and local veterinarypractice (Martin et al., 2001). There is a growing acceptance thatsome of these practices have therapeutic value, and that theyshould be documented before this knowledge is lost. Several stud-ies have been carried out, many reports written and numerousconferences and workshops held. These activities have saved eth-noveterinary knowledge from extinction: most knowledge resided

    0378-8741/$ see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.023

    http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.023http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.023http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03788741http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jethpharmmailto:[email protected]://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.023http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.023mailto:[email protected]://www.elsevier.com/locate/jethpharmhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03788741http://localhost/var/www/apps/conversion/tmp/scratch_2/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2010.05.023
  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    2/10

    370 S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378

    with elderly community members and disappeared as they died(Bonet and Valls, 2007; Ngeh et al., 2007; Kon and Atindehou,2008; Grad et al., 2009).

    Although agriculture and livestock-raising are still relevanthuman activities in Navarra (according to the official information,the number of animals registered in the most important produc-tions was 58,000 cows, 635,000 sheep, 4150 horses and, 67,000pigs, in 2005), it is clear that rural life and its associated traditionalculture have become rarer and will probably be residual in a fewyears, so that there is a real urgency in assembling all ethnobotan-ical information, both to preserve cultural patrimony and to makeavailabledatathat could lead tothe development ofnew medicines.As stated by Muhammad et al. (2005), ethnobotanical data providea basis for further validation of practices and plant uses in the con-text of a professional approach to ethnoveterinary (and we wouldadd simply to veterinary) medicine.

    As a result of ethnobotanical study of the Navarra (Akerreta etal., 2007a,b; Akerreta, 2009) and following this research line, theaims of the present study were to document the remedies usedto treat the known livestock diseases and other animal husbandryindications, highlighting their preparation, processing and admin-istration. In addition, the obtained results can use fornew scientificstudies.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Study area

    Navarra is an autonomous community (10,421km2) in thenorthern Iberian Peninsula in the western sector of the PyreneesMountains which is divided into seven agricultural regions (Fig. 1and Table 1). Starting at the limestone Pyrenean foothills reachingheights of 2428m which tower over steep-sided valleys composedof flysch (Gobierno de Navarra, 1997), the landscape then softensinto a geomorphology based on marls and limestone marls. In themiddle zone, characterized by its transitional nature, marls and

    limestone blend with sandstones, gradually yielding to gypsum,gravel, sand and mud which predominate in broad, windsweptplains that have been eroded over the course of time.

    According to Lpez et al. (2005), Navarra includes two macro-bioclimates,Temperateand Mediterranean,separated by a dividingchain of mountains. The oceanic temperate bioclimate appears inthe northern part of the territory, and is characterized by mildtemperatures and high precipitation throughout the year. Moreto the south, as precipitation decrease the oceanic temperate bio-climate changes to the sub-Mediterranean variant and finally tothe seasonal-rainfall Mediterranean bioclimate, characterized byseasonal drought (favoring species that are specifically Mediter-ranean). The latter bioclimate occupies most of the territory to thesouth, although there is also a small island of xeric Mediterranean

    in an area that is now a Biosphere Reserve due to its ecologicalimportance (Bardenas Reales) (Martin and Floristn, 1997). Owingto its geological, geomorphological and bioclimatic variability, ithas a rich flora (2650 vascular plants) (Gil et al., 2004).

    All these climatic factors, along with the geomorphologic andedaphological ones, which changesharply in a relatively small area,provide a great diversity of plant communities, such as the forestsof elm trees, both basophilic and acidophilic, the groves ofQuercusroburL. oak and Quercus humilis Miller, as well as holm oak, ever-green oak, gall oak, and Pyrenean pastures rich in the Alpine andsub-Alpine plant series, among others (Loidi and Bscones, 1995;Lorda, 2001).

    The area was inhabited by the Basques until the arrival ofthe Romans. It was later populated by the Visigoths. Nowa-

    days, only 10% of the population of Navarra speaks Euskera (in

    the northwest, mainly) the language of the Basque ethnic group(Etniker-Euskalerria, 2004), which has a direct influence on the useand names of the plants.

    2.2. Data collection and analysis

    Field and laboratory work began on 2003 and lasted untilSeptember 2007. During that time we interviewed 667 informantsin 265 locations (Fig. 1). The total informants by regions (676) donot correspond withthat given to the general results (667). The dif-ference (9) corresponds to the informants who have migrated fromtheir place of origin to another locality of a region different fromyours. In this new region apply knowledge of their place of origin,usually (and accordingto the informant), do notbelongin your newdestination where they learn traditional uses. These informantswere considered dual reporting andare counted twice,since theyprovide information in two different regions.

    I/P index (number of interview/inhabitant, in percentage) hadbeencalculatedinordertoknowifthenumberofinformantsissuit-able to the scientific validity of results obtained (Muntan, 2005).This author indicates that the minimal number of surveys for aterritory of Europes south is 0.10%. In our study, the population

    interviewed overcomes this minimum (Table 1, I/P= 0.11%). Thehighest value appears in the region 2 (I/P= 0.75). The regions 3 and7 present I/Ps values

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    3/10

    S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378 371

    Fig. 1. Distribution of localities and informants as agricultural regions. C1: Region 1; C2: Region 2; C3: Region 3; C4: Region 4; C5: Region 5; C6: Region 6; C7: Region 7; L:number of localities where ethnobotany information has been obtained; I: number of informants; () Situation of the localities.

    In the field work we notedfor each species thelocal name, placeand collection method, drying and preservation system, parts ororgansusedandmethodofpreparation,dosageandadministration.

    Plant vouchers were collected, mostly when accompanied

    with the informants and authenticated according to Flora Iber-ica (Castroviejo et al., 19862005) and Flora of the Basque Country(Aizpuru et al., 2003). These species were deposited in the PAMPHerbarium at the School of Science (University of Navarra).

    Theresults have beenstructured in a plantscatalogue(287 taxa)that considers the following items: plants mentioned (includingscientific and vernacular names); botanical families which theseplantsbelong to; herbarium voucher number, biologicaland choro-logical spectrums, habitat, regional and use distributions, indexesof frequency-dominance, chemical composition; informants whohave cited these plants; medicinal, edible and non-edible uses sep-arated by the part of the plant employed, andalso other utilizationsthat can have ethnobotanical interest. Pharmaceutical methods ofpreparing the remedies are also part of the catalogue, as well as if

    the plant referred can be part of a mixture (Akerreta, 2009).To assess the degree of originality and novelty of the usesclaimed by the informants, these were compared with those

    reported in more than 189 works in relation with human and/oranimal medicine (ethnobotany,economic botany, medicinal plantsand phytotherapy, mainly). The complete references are given inAkerreta (2009). We considered as very scarcely reported those not

    found in these papers, or appearing only in a maximum of threeof them. Informant consensus factor (FIC) which is the quotientbetween the number of use-reports minus the number of used taxaand the number of use-reports minus one was calculated (Trotterand Logan, 1986) in order to assess reliability and consistency ofmedicinal plant use, to select the most promising taxa for furtherchemical or pharmacological research in view of new drug devel-opment (Parada et al., 2009). The maximum value of this factor is 1,which means that informants show high knowledge andcoherenceabout medicinal plants uses.

    3. Results and discussion

    We recorded 3770use-reportsof the287 medicinal plantscited.Most uses (97.93%) concern human medicine, whereas very few(2.07%) are linked to veterinary medicine (Table 1). The greatestnumber of uses and taxa correspond to the regions C1, C5, C2

    Table 1

    Characteristics of each region, I/P, number of uses, taxa and FIC.

    Region Situationa,b Extension (km2)a Altitude maxmin;range (m)a

    Population (hab.)a I/P(%) No. uses (%) No taxa (%) FIC

    General Navarra 10,421 242818; 2410 620,377 0.11 78 (2.07) 36 (12.54) 0.55C1 Northwest Navarra:

    Humid CantabrianValleys and SouthernHumid Valleys

    1920.9 101918; 1001 56,218 0.25 28 (2.65) 17 (11.72) 0.41

    C2 Valleys of the Pyreneesand pre-Pyrenean

    2321.9 2428245; 2183 14,851 0.75 14 (2.09) 9 (8.41) 0.38

    C3 Pamplona Basin,Valdizarbe and part ofthe Val de Maneru

    778.2 1155330; 825 334,368 0.02 4 (1.31) 4 (4.88) 0.00

    C4 West, from the Urbasaand Andia the North tothe river in theextreme South

    1541.9 1493340; 1553 37,688 0.33 9 (1.55) 8 (6.15) 0.13

    C5 Middle Eastern Navarra 1302.1 1300300; 1000 32,578 0.25 17 (2.99) 7 (5.22) 0.63C6 Estella Riverside and

    Northern part of theRiverside

    1225.5 660260; 400 58,401 0.16 3 (0.89) 2 (2.99) 0.50

    C7 The most part of Tudela Riverside

    1328.9 740235; 505 86,273 0.06 3 (1.19) 3 (4.92) 0.00

    I/P= number of the interview/number inhabitant (in percentage).a C1, Elseguiand Prez (1982) and Institutode Estadstica de Navarra (2008). C2, Lorda(2001) and Institutode Estadstica de Navarra (2008). C3, Peralta (2000). C4, Peralta

    and Olano (2000). C5, Peralta (1996). C6, Peralta (1997). C7, Peralta (2002).b

    Ardaiz (1980).

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    4/10

    372 S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378

    and C4, respectively. These regions are directly related (C1C4,C2C5), due to the annual movement of the sheep of the win-ter pastures to the summer pastures, Transhumancia acrossthe Canadas reales. Transhumancia allowed exchanging experi-ences and knowledge between shepherds of the different areas ofNavarra.

    The informant consensus factor (FIC) in each region is less thanthe value obtained for the area in general (0.55). Only region C5has a value greater than the general (0.63), due to the widespreaduse ofAchillea millefolium ssp. millefolium, Arctostaphylos uva-ursiand Malva sylvestris. These data would be able to justify the lownumber of medicinaltaxa employees in Navarra, as if certain plantsareeffective,weneednotgolookingformore(Mesa-Jimnez,1996;Heinrich et al., 1998).

    3.1. Species most often reported and with the most varied uses

    Of the 36 plant species traditionally used in Navarra for eth-noveterinary purposes (Table 2 ), the most frequently used plantswere Malva sylvestris (15 different uses), Juglans regia (7) and Ver-bena officinalis (5). Malvasylvestris isalsothe most relevant inotherareas studied (Bonet and Valls, 2007). These species are common,

    frequent and abundants according to frequency-abundance index(Gobierno de Navarra, 1991).

    3.2. Botanical families

    The 287 species of Navarrass folk medicine belong to 72 fami-lies, with the following being the main ones: Compositae (14.29%),Labiatae (10.47%) and Rosaceae (8.01%). If we take the 36 speciesused to treat cattle illnesses, the degree of agreement is consid-erable: these taxa belong to 26 families, the main ones beingCompositae (6 species), Labiatae (3), Malvaceae (3) and Urticaceae(2). It is worth mentioning that, although the number of speciesused in veterinary medicine is less than 13% of the total number ofmedicinal plants, the number of families reaches 36.1%. The same

    familiesarealsothemostrelevantinotherareasstudied(BonetandValls, 2007 and references therein). This corroborates the argu-ment of numerous authors that, the more common a plant (speciesor family) is in an area, the more likely it is that it is used (Johns etal.,1990;Bonetetal.,1992,1999;Gonzlez-Tejeroetal.,1995;Raja,1995; Vzquez et al., 1997; Agelet, 1999; Fernndez-Ocana, 2000;Bonet, 2001; Novais et al., 2004; Maca et al., 2005; Scherrer et al.,2005; De la Cruz et al., 2007; Rigat et al., 2007). In addition, mostof the families mentioned are very big and very rich in medicinalplants.

    3.3. Parts of plant used in the composition of veterinary remedies

    The most frequently used parts of plants are the aerial part(54.7%), floral structures (17%) leaves (13.2%) and whole plant(7.5%). In low proportion used bark, oil, bulb and root (1.9% eachone).Theseproportionsaresimilar inotherareas(AgeletandValls,1999; Bonet and Valls, 2007) and are consistent with the per-centages of parts of plants used in Navarra for human medicine(Akerreta, 2009). Numerous studies establish a relation betweenthe pharmacological activity of the plants and the used organ. Theleaves are more exposed to environmental damages and there-fore its synthesize as mechanisms of defense active compoundsof therapeutic interest (McCune and Johns, 2007). For this reasonthis organ is the most employed in traditional medicine. Never-theless, other parts of the plant like as flowers, fruits or cone alsocontain compounds of pharmacologicalactivity but on having beenavailable during less time a year their use is low.

    3.4. Methods of preparation and administration

    Plants used in traditional remedies are prepared and adminis-tered in different forms and the administration of these medicinesincludes oral absorption, poultice application, inhalation, or othermeans. The percentage of internal uses (64.06%) is significantlyhigher than that if external uses (29.69%), 6.25% are Rites. Coldwater extraction was by far the most common preparation used,infusions and decoctions (34.37%, each one), both with fresh plant(68.75%), dry plant (20.31%) and only a 10.93% without distinction.

    Forinternaluse,tisanes(moreinfusions 51.22%thandecoction34.14%) are far followed by direct administration or comestible(9.76%), vapours andsmoke inhalation or sahumerios(2.44%eachone).

    The most important forms of preparation for external uses aredecoctions (42.10%) and poultices (31.58%), both used for treat-ments of wounds. In minor proportion, preparations in olive oil(maceration), direct administration, infusion, vapours and smokeinhalation or sahumerios are also encountered (5.26% each one).We have not found differences in the forms of preparation andadministration with human medicine (Vanaclocha and Canigueral,2003).

    It is difficult to establish a quantitative formulation of reme-

    dies, because dosages arenot alwaysknown(or only approximatelygiven, almost never in units such as grams).

    3.5. Main affections treated

    The most treated illnesses or troubles we grouped in sevenpathological groups (Table 3). We found 19 remedies to treatdigestive problems (carminative, colic, diarrhoea, evil tripe,gastroenteritis, laxative, purgative, stomach ache, to reactivaterumination, to the bloating andvomiting);18 remedies to cure der-matologicalproblems (scabies, skin spots,skin diseases, ringworm,and wounds); 10 remedies for respiratory tract infections (bron-chitis, sore-throat, cold, distemper in dogs and cats and catarrh); 5remedies to cure problems of the reproductive systems (mastitis,

    for the expulsion of the placenta and clean the animal, and contra-ceptive); 3 remedies are used to urinary systems (for the kidneys).Lesser numbers of remedies are used to cardiovascular conditions(hypertension, anti-inflammatory) and depurative. At the end ofTable 3 we indicate a group namely Various due to, in general,the use-reports are used if the animals are sick, without specifyingthe type of disease or condition. It is frequent that the informantsindicate exactly the animal: for the disease of pigs (7 uses); forthe disease of chickens (4 uses) and for the disease of sheep (1use).

    We found a high degree of coincidence between the plantsused in human and veterinary medicine because people use cer-tain plants to take care of both themselves and their domesticanimals, which are so important in their daily lives (Satrstegui,

    1976; Bonet, 2001; Bonet and Valls, 2006). All reported species(36) are medicinal plants in human. For 44% of them (16) do notexist bibliographical references to the uses compiled, and for 25%,(9) only one reference has been found in veterinary (Table 4).

    Most of the plants (26 out of 36 species recorded, 77.22%) areused to treat only one ailment. Malva sylvestris is the most usedplant for different diseases and regions: dermatology affections (4uses, C1, C2 and C7), digestive alterations (3 uses, C1, C3 and C6)and respiratory problems (5 uses, C5 and C6).

    Gastrointestinal troubles (Table 3) are one of the most commonhealth problems 24.36% of the uses tackled by popular phy-tomedicine in animals, as in humans. C5 show a high degree ofreliability of the used claimed (FIC = 0.50);Juglans regia andAchilleamillefolium are the most employed plants. A very frequent disease

    is tympany (distension of the abdomen due to the accumulation

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    5/10

    S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378 373

    Table 2

    Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants in Navarra.

    Family/scientific name Local names Part used Popular use(therapeutic category)

    Preparation Aa Cb Rc

    AquifoliaceaeIlex aquifolium L (PAMP22899)

    Acebo Aerial part To cure scabies inanimals (Dm)

    Rite (F) 1 C4

    Aerial part To combat ringworm of cattle (Dm)

    Rite (F) 1 C4

    Colositos, Bolostios Aerial part To cure skin problemsin cows (Dm) Rite (F) 1 C2

    AspleniaceaeAsplenium trichomanes L.subsp. trichomanes(PAMP 21116)

    Hierba de las mujeres Whole plant For the expulsion of the placenta and cleanthe animal after havingpups (Rp)

    Infusion Internal (F) 1 C4

    BuxaceaeBuxus sempervirens L.(PAMP 18660)

    Boj Leaf Purgative (Dg) Infusion Internal (I) 1 C4

    CampanulaceaeCampanula trachelium L.(PAMP 21143)

    Auxina hila Aerial part Pig diseases (Vr) Infusion (cold) Internal (I) 1 C1

    CannabaceaeHumulus lupulus L.(PAMP 21144)

    Lupibelarra Aerial part Pig diseases (Vr) Directapplication inincision

    External (F) 2 C1

    CaprifoliaceaeSambucus nigra L. ssp.nigra (PAMP 18663)

    Saco Bark (internal) Mastitis (Rp) Poultice External (F) 1 C2

    Flota Inflorescence For diseases of cowsand mules, mostly badbronchial (Rs)

    Smoke inhalation External (D) 1 C3

    CompositaeAchillea millefolium L. ssp.millefolium (PAMP21185)

    Camomila Inflorescence Stomach ache (Dg) Infusion Internal (D) 2 C5

    Sore-throat (Rs) Vapourinhalation

    Internal (D) 1 C5

    Anthemis arvensis L. ssp.arvensis (PAMP 18758)

    Manzanilla para los animales Inflorescence Animal diseases (Vr) Infusion Internal (D) 1 C1

    Chamaemelum nobile (L.)All. (PAMP 18762)

    Manzanilla Inflorescence To the bloating of theewes in spring (Dg)

    Infusion Internal (D) 1 C1

    Animal diseases (Vr) Infusion (withTanacetum

    parthenium)

    Internal (D) 1 C1

    Jasonia tuberosa (L.) DC.(PAMP 21275)

    T Flowered aerial part Colic and bloatedfeeling in the stomach(Dg)

    Decoction Internal (D) 1 C6

    Santolina

    chamaecyparissus L. ssp.squarrosa (DC.) Nyman(PAMP 18777)

    Hierba para el mal de las gallinas Inflorescence Chicken diseases (Vr) Infusion Internal (D) 1 C1

    Tanacetum parthenium

    (L.) Schultz Bip. (PAMP21310)

    Manzanilla del ganado Inflorescence Animal diseases (Vr) Infusion (withChamaemelum

    nobile)

    Internal (D) 1 C1

    CupressaceaeJuniperus communis L.ssp. communis (PAMP21363)

    Ginebro, orrea Trunk oil Sheep diseases (Vr) Comestible Internal (F) 1 C3

    EricaceaeArctostaphylos uva-ursi

    (L.) Spreng. (PAMP21407)

    Bicharuelo Leaf For the kidneys (Ur) Decoction Internal (I) 3 C5

    EuphorbiaceaeEuphorbia amygdaloides

    L. ssp. amygdaloides(PAMP 21500)

    Auskurrumia Aerial part Contraceptive for cows(Rp)

    Decoction Internal (F) 1 C1

    GeraniaceaeGeranium robertianum L.(PAMP 21548)

    Zaingorri Aerial part Diarrhoea (Dg) Infusion Internal (F) 1 C1

    Hierba para diarrea de gorrines Aerial part Diarrhoea in calves andpiglets (Dg)

    Decoction Internal (F) 1 C1

    GramineaeAvena sativa L. (PAMP 2) Avena Aerial part To reactivate

    rumination in steers,carminative (Dg)

    Comestible Internal (I) 1 C4

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    6/10

    374 S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378

    Table 2

    (Continued. )

    Family/scientific name Local names Part used Popular use(therapeutic category)

    Preparation Aa Cb Rc

    GuttiferaeHypericum perforatum L.(PAMP 21555)

    Hiprico Flowered aerial part Wounds (Dm) Maceration (inolive oil)

    External (F) 1 C7

    JuglandaceaeJuglans regia L. (PAMP

    22072)

    Noguera Leaf Anticolic in horses (Dg) Decoction Internal (F) 4 C4, C5

    Nogal Leaf Wounds (Dm) Decoction External (F) 2 C2Leaf buds Wounds (Dm) Decoction External (F) 1 C2

    LabiataeLamium maculatum (L.) L.(PAMP 21574)

    Auxina hila Aerial part Pig diseases (Vr) Infusion (cold) Internal (F) 1 C1

    Marrubium vulgare L.(PAMP 21596)

    Marruego Aerial part Animal diseases (Vr) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C5

    Origanum vulgare L. ssp.vulgare (PAMP 21637)

    Organo Flowered aerial part Cold (Rs) Infusion Internal (D) 1 C2

    LiliaceaeAllium sativum L. (PAMP21718)

    Ajo Bulb Distemper in dogs andcats (Rs)

    Rite (F) 1 C2

    LoranthaceaeViscum album L. ssp.album (PAMP 21819)

    Murdago o mermasangre Aerial part Hypertension (Cd) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C2

    For the expulsion of

    the placenta (Rp)

    Infusion Internal (F) 1 C1

    LythraceaeLythrum salicaria L.(PAMP 18707)

    Salicaria, makilbelarra Aerial part Diarrhoea, vomiting orgastroenteritis (Dg)

    Infusion Internal (I) 1 C1

    MalvaceaeAlthaea officinalis L.(PAMP 18805)

    Malvavisco Root Sore-throat (Rs) Vapourinhalation

    External (F) 1 C5

    Stomach ache (Dg) Infusion External (F) 1 C5Malva neglecta Wallr.(PAMP 21824)

    Malva Flower Wounds (Dm) Poultice External (F) 1 C2

    Aerial part Laxative in horses (Dg) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C5Malva sylvestris L. (PAMP21836)

    Malva Flower Cattle evil tripe (Dg) Infusion Internal (F) 1 C1

    Aerial part Wounds (Dm) Poultice External (F) 2 C1, C2Catarrh (Rs) Smoke inhalation Internal (D) 4 C5Pig diseases (Vr) Infusion ms

    harinaInternal (F) 1 C2

    Respiratory problemsin horses (Rs) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C6Wounds in catle (Dm) Decoction External (F) 1 C1Colic in horses (Dg) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C6Anti-inflammatory (Vr) Decoction External (F) 1 C2To reactivaterumination,carminative (Dg)

    Infusion Internal (F) 1 C3

    Flowered aerial part Animal diseases (Vr) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C2Whole plant Horse wounds (Dm) Decoction External (F) 1 C7

    OleaceaeFraxinus angustifolia Vahlssp. angustifolia (PAMP21846)

    Fresno Leaf Depurative (Dp) Comestible Internal (F) 1 C4

    OnagraceaeEpilobium parviflorum

    Schreb. (PAMP 21856)Auxina hila Aerial part Pig diseases (Vr) Infusion (cold) Internal (I) 1 C1

    PrimulaceaeAnagallis arvensis L.(PAMP 19649)

    Pasmobelarra Aerial part Wounds disinfection(Dm)

    Decoction (withVerbena

    officinalis)

    External (F) 2 C1

    Whole plant Wounds disinfection(Dm)

    Decoction External (I) 1 C1

    RosaceaeCrataegus monogyna Jacq.(PAMP 21922)

    Elorri zuria Flowered aerial part For snake venom forsheep (Vr)

    Poultice External (F) 1 C1

    For snake venom forsheep (Vr)

    Infusion Internal (F) 1 C1

    TiliaceaeTilia platyphyllos Scop.ssp. platyphyllos (PAMP18752)

    Tilo Inflorescence Chicken diseases (Vr) Decoction Internal (D) 1 C4

    Animal diseases (Vr) Infusion Internal (D) 1 C2

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    7/10

    S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378 375

    Table 2

    (Continued. )

    Family/scientific name Local names Part used Popular use(therapeutic category)

    Preparation Aa Cb Rc

    UrticaceaeUrtica dioica L. (PAMP19658)

    Auxina Leaf buds Pig diseases (Vr) Comestible Internal (F) 1 C1

    Oxina Aerial part To the bloating of theewes in spring (Dg)

    Infusion Internal (F) 1 C1

    Urtica urens L. (PAMP21761) Ortiga Whole plant Spots on the skin of piglets (Dm) Decoction Internal (F) 1 C7

    VerbenaceaeVerbena officinalis L.(PAMP 21792)

    Berbenabelarra Flowered aerial part Chicken diseases (Vr) Infusion Internal (F) 2 C1

    Kolpebelarra Aerial part Wounds (Dm) Decoction (WithAnagallis

    arvensis)

    External (F) 1 C1

    Verbena Aerial part Wounds of cattle (Dm) Poultice con clarade huevo

    External (F) 1 C4

    For wounds andproblems in the uddersof cows mastitis (Rp)

    Poultice con clarade huevo

    External (F) 1 C3

    Therapeutic category: Dg (Digestive); Dm (Dermatology); Rs (Respiratory); Rp (Reproductive); Ur (Urinary); Dp (Depurative); Cd (Cardiovascular); Vr (Various).a A: administration; F: fresh; D: dry; I: without distinction.b C: frequency of citation.c R: agricultural regions.

    Table 3

    Taxa most employed in each therapheutic category and region for veterinary disorders. No. of uses (U) and percentage (%), no. of taxa (T) and FIC.

    Disorders U % T FIC Taxa (most used) %

    DigestiveGeneral 19 24.36 12 0.39 Juglans regia 21.05C1 6 31.58 5 0.20 Geranium robertianum 33.33C3 1 5.26 1 0 Malva sylvestris 100C4 3 15.79 3 0 Buxus sempervirens; Juglans regia; Avena sativa 33.33C5 7 36.84 4 0.50 Juglans regia; Achillea millefolium 42.86C6 2 10.53 2 0 Malva sylvestris; Jasonia tuberosa 50.00

    DermatologyGeneral 18 23.08 8 0.59 Malva sylvestris 22.22C1 6 33.33 3 0.60 Anagallis arvensis 50.00C2 6 33.33 4 0.40 Juglans regia 50.00C4 3 16.67 2 0.50 Ilex aquifolium 66.67

    C7 3 16.67 3 0 Urtica urens; Hypericum perforatum; Malva sylvestris 33.33

    RespiratoryGeneral 10 12.82 6 0.44 Malva sylvestris 50.00C2 2 20.00 2 0 Origanum vulgare ssp. vulgare, Allium sativum 50.00C3 1 10.00 1 0 Sambucus nigra ssp. nigra 100C5 6 60.00 3 0.60 Malva sylvestris 66.67C6 1 10.00 1 0 Malva sylvestris 100

    ReproductiveGeneral 5 6.41 5 0.00 Euphorbia amygdaloides, Viscum album, Sambucus nigra,

    Verbena officinalis, Asplenium trichomanes

    C1 2 40.00 2 0 Euphorbia amygdaloides ssp. amygdaloides; Viscum albumssp. album

    50.00

    C2 1 20.00 1 0 Sambucus nigra ssp. nigra 100C3 1 20.00 1 0 Verbena officinalis 100C4 1 20.00 1 0 Asplenium trichomanes ssp. trichomanes 100

    UrinaryGeneral 3 3.85 1 1.00 Arctostaphylos uva-ursi 100C5 3 100 1 1.00

    DepurativeGeneral 1 1.28 1 0 Fraxinus angustifolia ssp. angustifolia 100C4 1 100 1 0

    CardiovascularGeneral 1 1.28 1 0 Viscum album ssp. album 100C2 1 100 1 0

    VariousGeneral 21 26.92 16 0.25 Malva sylvestris 14.29C1 14 66.67 11 0.23 Verbena officinalis; Humulus lupulus; Crataegus monogyna 14.29C2 4 19.05 2 0.67 Malva sylvestris 75.00C3 1 4.76 1 0 Juniperus communis ssp. communis 100C4 1 4.76 1 0 Tilia platyphyllos ssp. platyphyllos 100C5 1 4.76 1 0 Marrubium vulgare 100

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    8/10

    376 S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378

    Table 4

    Ethnoveterinary uses of medicinal plants in Navarra.

    Therapeutic category Family/scientific name Veterinary references Human references

    Digestive Achillea millefolium ssp. millefolium Agelet and Valls (1999), Agelet et al. (2002)and Pinto (2005)

    +3

    Althaea officinalis Fernndez (1990) and Lans et al. (2007) +3Avena sativa Raja (1995) and Bonet and Valls (2007) +3Buxus sempervirens +3 +3Chamaemelum nobile Fernndez (1990) and Pardo de Santayana

    (2004)

    +3

    Geranium robertianum 0 +3Jasonia tuberosa 0 +3Juglans regia Guarrera (1999) and Pardo de Santayana

    (2004)+3

    Lythrum salicaria Pardo de Santayana (2004) and Bonet andValls (2006, 2007)

    +3

    Malva neglecta Agelet and Valls (1999) and Pardo deSantayana (2004)

    +3

    Malva sylvestris +3 +3Urtica dioica Agelet et al. (2002), Pardo de Santayana (2004)

    and Lans et al. (2007)+3

    Dermatology Anagallis arvensis 0 +3Hypericum perforatum +3 +3Ilex aquifolium Verde (2002) Fernndez (1981, 1990) and Lakar and

    Telletxea (2006)Juglans regia +3 +3Malva neglecta Blanco et al. (1999) +3Malva sylvestris +3 +3Urtica urens Galn (1993) +3Verbena officinalis Agelet et al. (2002) +3

    Respiratory Achillea millefoliumssp. millefolium 0 +3Allium sativum +3 +3Althaea officinalis 0 +3Malva sylvestris Fernndez (1990) +3Origanum vulgare ssp. vulgare 0 +3Sambucus nigra ssp. nigra 0 +3

    Reproductive Asplenium trichomanes ssp. trichomanes 0 Pieroni and Quave (2005)Euphorbia amygdaloides ssp. amygdaloides 0 0Sambucus nigra ssp. nigra Agelet (1999), Valls et al. (2004) and Bonet

    and Valls (2006)+3

    Verbena officinalis 0 Raja (1995)Viscum albumssp. album Pardo de Santayana (2004) San Miguel (2004) and Kltr (2007)

    Urinary Arctostaphylos uva-ursi 0 +3Depurative Fraxinus angustifolia ssp. angustifolia 0 +3

    Cardiovascular Viscum album ssp. album Villar et al. (1987), Fernndez (1990) andAgelet et al. (2002)

    +3

    Various Anthemis arvensis ssp. arvensis Galn (1993) and Pardo de Santayana (2004) +3Campanula trachelium 0 Rigat (2005) and Rigat et al. (2007)Chamaemelum nobile Pinto (2005) +3Crataegus monogyna 0 0Epilobium parviflorum 0 0Humulus lupulus 0 +3

    Juniperus communis ssp. communis +3 +3Lamium maculatum 0 Villar et al. (1987), San Miguel (2004)

    and Pinto (2005)Malva sylvestris +3 +3Marrubium vulgare +3 +3Santolina chamaecyparissus ssp. squarrosa +3 +3Tanacetum parthenium +3 +3Tilia platyphyllos ssp. platyphyllos Pardo de Santayana (2004) +3Urtica dioica +3 +3Verbena officinalis Agelet et al. (2000) +3

    0: no references; +3: more than three references.

    of air or gas in the gastrointestinal tract or abdominal cavity par-ticularly affects ruminants bloat or ruminal tympany and canvery well cause collapse and death). This trouble is considered byour informants as to thebloating of the animals in spring and themost used species are Chamaemelum nobile, Urtica dioica, Malvasylvestris, administered in infusion y Avena sativa as edible plant(Table 2). As well, Agelet and Valls (1999) and Viegi et al. (2003)indicate a high number of plants used for the same purpose. Fortwo species, Geranium robertianum and Jasonia tuberosa, does not

    exist bibliographic references in the scientific literature of the usein veterinary; nevertheless, both possess numerous references inhuman medicine for the same indications.

    The wounds of the cattle are the most frequent affections(77.77% uses reports) in Dermatology. C1, C2 and C4 present highFIC(0.60,0.40 and0.50, respectively) dueto thefrequent useof cer-tain plants: Anagallis arvensis, for the disinfection of wounds in thehumid zone of the northwest (C1), it is important to indicate thatno reference has been found in the literature for this therapeutic

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    9/10

    S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378 377

    indication;Juglans regia,inthevalleysofthepre-Pyrenean(C2);andIlex aquifolium a ritual plant (the plants hung on thecattle) in C4. InCastillaLaMancha, Ilex aquifolium isemployedforthesamepurpose(Verde, 2002). The treatment of dermatological affections is morefrequent in the C1 and C2 in both veterinary and human medicine(Akerreta, 2009). The humid climate of these regions increases theappearance of external infected wounds that heal slowly.

    In C5 the most used species in respiratory affections is Malvasylvestris (FIC=0.60); 4 of 6 reported uses are due to this plant.The sahumerios ofSambucus nigra for the treatment of colds areused both in human beings and in animals. For 2/3 of the species(4) bibliographic references do not exist in veterinary; all of themhave been widely studied human medicine.

    Placenta retention is the most frequent after labour in animals,Asplenium trichomanes ssp. trichomanes, Viscum album ssp. albumare the plants used for this purpose. We have found very few bibli-ographic references to both species in this therapeutic category (0and 1, respectively).

    For the category Urinary, Depurative and Cardiovascular onlyone plant has been compiled for each group. It is important tohighlighting the use ofArctostaphylos uva-ursi (FIC= 1, C5) for thekidneys. For Crataegus monogyna and Epilobium parviflorum wehave not found bibliographic references for veterinary and human

    uses.

    4. Concluding remarks

    The present study showed that a part of the pool of medicinalplants that constitutethe pharmaceutical ethnofloraof Navarra areused in veterinary medicine (36 species, 12.54% of medicinal uses).The remedies are mostly for cows, calves, sheep, pigs and horses,but cover almost all domestic animal species. The main ailmentstreated are digestive troubles and dermatological problems. Theconsistency and persistence of plant veterinary uses are relativelylow, and a considerable number (69.4%) of the uses found are newor very little documented to date.

    Although agriculture and livestock-raising are still relevant

    human activities, it is clear that rural life and its associated tra-ditional culture have become rarer and will probably be residual ina few years, so that there is a real urgency in assembling all eth-nobotanical information, both to preserve cultural patrimony andto make available data that could lead to the development of newmedicines.

    In our study a number of scarcely reported plant uses hasbeen detected, some of them with promising phytotherapeuticalapplications. More specific actions could involve prioritising thislarge list and then conducting validation studies. We believe thatthere should be some studies of efficacy and safety of the listedspecies to foster wider acceptability and could start with Gera-nium robertianum against digestive affections, Anagallis arvensisfor dermatological troubles,Arctostaphylos uva-ursi against urinary

    diseases. If further developed, it could add useful drugs to modernveterinary pharmacopoeia.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank all our informants, who were happy to share with ustheirknowledge.ThisstudyhasbeensubsidizedbyagrantfromtheNavarra Government, and the Foundation Universidad de Navarra.

    References

    Agelet, A., 1999. Estudis dEtnobotnicafarmacuticaal Pallars. Ph.D. Thesis, Facultyof Pharmacy, University of Barcelona, 2616 pp. 4 diskettes.

    Agelet,A.,Bonet,M..,Valls,J.,2000.Homegardensandtheirroleasamainsourceofmedicinalplants in mountainregionsof Catalonia(Iberian Peninsula).Economic

    Botany 54, 295309.

    Agelet, A., Muntan, J., Parada, M., Valls, J., 2002. Plantes medicinals del Pirineucatal. Farell. Sant Vicenc de Castellet.

    Agelet, A., Valls, J., 1999. Vascular plants used in ethnoveterinary in Pallars (Pyre-nees, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). In: Pieroni, A. (Ed.), Herbs, Humans andAnimals. Erbe, uomini e bestie. Experiences Verlag, Kln, pp. 1435.

    Agelet, A., Valls, J., 2001. Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in the region ofPallars (Pyrenees, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula). Part I. General results and newor very rare medicinal plants. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 77, 5770.

    Aizpuru, I., Aseginolaza, C., Uribe-Echevarra, PM., Urrutia, P., Zorrazkin, I., 2003.Flora del Pas Vasco y territorios limtrofes. Bilbao.

    Akerreta, S., 2009. Etnobotnica farmacutica en Navarra: del uso tradicional de las

    plantas medicinales a su evidencia cientfica. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Science,University of Navarra, 831 pp. 1 CD.Akerreta, S., Cavero, R.Y., Calvo, M.I., 2007a. First comprehensive contribution to

    medical ethnobotany of Western Pyrenees. Journal of Ethnobiology and Eth-nomedicine 3, 26.

    Akerreta, S., Cavero, R.Y., Lpez, V., Calvo, M.I., 2007b. Analyzing factors that influ-ence the folk use and phytonomy of 18 medicinal plants in Navarra. Journal ofEthnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3, 16.

    Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., 2005. Why study the use of animal products in traditionalmedicines? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 1, 15.

    Alves, R.R.N., Rosa, I.L., 2007. Biodiversity, traditional medicine and public health:where do they meet? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 3, 19.

    Anyinam, C., 1995. Ecology and ethnomedicine: exploring links between currentenvironmental crisis and indigenous medical practices. Social Science andMedicine 4, 321329.

    Ardaiz, 1, 1980. Navarra, elementos para su estudio regional. Eusko ikaskuntza.Burlada.

    Blanco, E.,Maca, M.J., Morales,R., 1999. Medicinaland veterinary plants of El Caurel(Galicia, northwest Spain). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 65, 113124.

    Bonet, M.., 2001. Estudi etnobotnic del Montseny. Tesis Doctoral, Universitat deBarcelona.

    Bonet, M.., Valls, J., 2006. Plantes, remeis i cultura popular del Montseny.Etnobotnica duna Reserva de la Biosfera. Brau edicions. Figueres.

    Bonet, M.., Valls, J., 2007. Ethnobotany of montsenybiosphere reserve (Catalonia,Iberian Peninsula): plants used in veterinary medicine. Journal of Ethnophar-macology 110, 130147.

    Bonet, M.., Blanch, C., Valls, J., 1992. Ethnobotanical study in River Tenes valley.Journal of Ethnopharmacology 37, 205212.

    Bonet, M.., Parada, M., Selga, A., Valls, J., 1999. Studies on pharmaceutical eth-nobotany in the regions of LAlt Empord and Les Guilleries (Catalonia, IberianPeninsula). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 68, 145168.

    Castroviejo, S., et al. (Eds.), 19862005. FloraIbrica. Plantas vasculares de la Penn-sula Ibrica e Islas Baleares, vols. IVIII, X, XIV, XXI. Real Jardn Botnico-CSIC,Madrid.

    Colwell, R.K., Coddington, J.A., 1995. Estimating terrestrial biodiversity throughextrapolation. In: Hawksworth, D.L. (Ed.), Biodiversity Measurement and Esti-mation. Chapman & Hall, pp. 101118.

    David, J.P.,Anderson, L.A.,1969.Ethnopharmacologyand westernmedicine.Journalof Ethnopharmacology 25, 6172.Dela Cruz, H.,Vilcapoma, G.,Cevallos, P.A., 2007. Ethnobotanaical study of medicinal

    plants used bythe andeanpeople ofCanta, Lima, Peru.Journal of Ethnopharma-cology 111, 284294.

    Elsegui, J.,Prez,F., 1982. Navarra,naturaleza y paisaje. Cajade Ahorrosde Navarra,Pamplona.

    Ember, C.R., Ember, M., 1997. Antropologa Cultural, 8th ed. Prentice Hall, Madrid.Etniker-Euskalerria, 2004. Medicinapopularen Vasconia.EuskoJaurlaritza andGob-

    ierno de Navarra, Bilbao.Fernndez, M., 1981. Las plantas en la medicina popular I. Navarra hmeda el NO.

    Eusko Ikaskuntza, Pamplona.Fernndez, M., 1990. Gran Enciclopedia Navarra. Caja de Ahorros de Navarra, Pam-

    plona.Fernndez-Ocana, A.M., 2000.Estudioetnobotnico en el Parque Natural de las Sier-

    ras de Cazorla, Segura y las Villas. Investigacinqumicaen un grupo de especiesinteresantes. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Jan.

    Galn, R., 1993. Patrimonio etnobotnico de la provincia de Crdoba: PedrochesSierra Norte y Vega del Guadalquivir. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Crdoba.

    Gemedo-Dalle,T., Maass, B.L.,Isselstein,J., 2005.Plant biodiversity and ethnobotanyof Borana Pastoralists in SouthernOromia, Ethiopia.EconomicBotany59, 4365.Gil, T., Berastegi, A., Lorda, M., Peralta, J., 2004. reas importantes para las plantas

    vascularesen Navarra (N Pennsula Ibrica). In: 4th European Conference aboutWild Plant Conservation, Valencia, Spain.

    Gobierno de Navarra, 1991. Catlogo florstico de Navarra. Segundo borrador(indito). Vol. I, II, y III. Gobierno de Navarra. Pamplona.

    Gobiernode Navarra, 1997. Mapa geolgicode Navarra. Gobiernode Navarra, Pam-plona.

    Gonzlez-Tejero, M.R., Molero-Mesa, J., Casares-Porcel, M., Mrtnez-Lirola, M.J.,1995. New contributions to the etnopharmacology of Spain. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 45, 157165.

    Gotelli, N.J., Colwell, R.K., 2001. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfallsin the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 4,379391.

    Grad, J.T., Tabuti John, R.S., Van Damme, P., 2009. Ethnoveterinary knowledge inpastoral Karamoja, Uganda. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 122, 273293.

    Guarrera, P.M., 1999. Traditional antihelmintic, antiparasitic and repellent uses ofplants in Central Italy. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 68, 183192.

  • 7/29/2019 Akerreta 2010 Journal of Ethnopharmacology

    10/10

    378 S. Akerreta et al. / Journal of Ethnopharmacology 130 (2010) 369378

    Heinrich, M., Ankli, A., Frei, B., Weimann, C., Sticher, O., 1998. Medicinal plantsin Mexico: healers consensus and cultural importance. Social Science andMedicine 47, 18591871.

    Instituto de Estadstica de Navarra, 2008. Available onlinehttp://www.cfnavarra.es/estadistica/confidex.asp.

    Johns, T., Kokwaro, J.O., Kimanani, E.K., 1990. Herbalremedies of the Luo of Siaya dis-trict, Kenya: establishing quantitative criteria for consensus. Economic Botany44, 369381.

    Kon, W.M., Atindehou, K.K., 2008. Ethnobotanical inventory of medicinal plantsused in traditional veterinary medicine in Northern Cte dIvoire (West Africa).South African Journal of Botany 74, 7684.

    Kltr, S., 2007. Medicinal plants used in Kirklareli province (Turkey). Journal ofEthnopharmacology 111, 341364.Kunwar, R., Bussmann, R.W., 2008. Ethnobotany in the Nepal Himalaya. Journal of

    Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 4, 24.Lakar, M., Telletxea, A., 2006. Baztan solasean. Ahozko tradizioaren bilduna. Nafar-

    roako Gobernua, Baztango Udala, Iruna.Lans, C., Nancy, T., Gerhard, B., Grant, L., Karla, G., 2006. Ethnoveterinary medicines

    used for horses in Trinidad and in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Ethnobi-ology and Ethnomedicine 2, 1.

    Lans,C., Turner,N., Khan, T.,Brauer,G., Boepple,W., 2007. Ethnoveternary medicinesused for ruminants in British Columbia, Canada. Journal of Ethnobiology andEthnomedicine 3, 11.

    Lev, E., 2003. Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine practice. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 86, 107118.

    Loidi, J., Bscones, J.C., 1995. Memoria y Mapa de series de vegetacin de Navarra.Gobierno de Navarra, Pamplona.

    Lpez, M.L., Pinas, S., Akerreta, S., Amezketa, A., Lpez, S., 2005. Mapa bioclimtico-2a Publicaciones de Biologa de la Universidad de Navarra. Serie Botnica 16,8797.

    Lorda, M., 2001. Flora del Pirineo Navarro. Guineana. Zarautz.Maca, M.J., Garca, E., Vidaurre, P.J., 2005. An ethnobotanical survey of medicinal

    plants commercialized in the markets of La Paz and El Alto, Bolivia. Journal ofEthnopharmacology 97, 337350.

    Martin, G.J., 1995. Ethnobotany. A Methods Manual. Chapman & Hall, London.Martin,J.,Floristn,A.,1997.BardenasRealesdeNavarra.CajadeAhorrosdeNavarra,

    Pamplona.Martin, M., Mathias, E., McCorkle, C.M., 2001. Ethnoveterinary Medicine: An Anno-

    tated Bibliography of Community Animal Healthcare. ITDG Publishing, Essex,England.

    McCorkle, C.M., 1986. An introduction to ethnoveterinary research and develop-ment. Journal of Ethnobiology 6, 129149.

    McCune, L., Johns, T., 2007. Antioxidant activity relates to plant part, life form andgrowing condition in some diabetes remedies. Journal of Ethnopharmacology112, 461469.

    Mesa-Jimnez, S., 1996. Algunos elementos para el anlisis numrico de los datosen etnobotnica. Monografas Jardn Botnico de Crdoba 3, 6973.

    Muhammad, G., Khan, M.Z., Hussain, M.H., Iqbal, Z., Iqbal, M., Athar, M., 2005. Eth-

    noveterinarypracticesof owners of pneumatic-cartpullingcamelsin FaisalabadCity (Pakistan). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 97, 241246.Muntan, J., 2005. Etnobotnica, etnofarmcia i tradicions populars de la Catalunya

    septentrinal (Capcir,Cerdanyai Conflent). Ph.D. Thesis,Universitatde Barcelona.Ngeh, J.T., Wanyama, J., Nuwanyakpa, M., Django, S., 2007. Ethnoveterinary

    Medicine, A Practical Approach to the Treatment of Cattle Diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa, 2nd ed. Agromisa Foundation and CTA, Wageningen, TheNetherlands.

    Novais,M.H.,Santos,I.,Mendes,S.,Pinto-Gomes,C.,2004.Studiesonpharmaceuticalethnobotanyin Arrabida Natural Park(Portugal).Journalof Ethnopharmacology93, 183195.

    Parada, M., Carri, E., Bonet, M.A., Valls, J., 2009. Ethnobotany of the Alt Empordregion (Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula)Plantsused in human traditional medicine.

    Journal of Ethnopharmacology 124, 609618.Pardo de Santayana, M., 2004. Gua de las plantas medicinales de Cantabria. Salud y

    Tradicin popular. Librera Estudio. Santander.Peralta, J., 1996. Series de vegetacin y sectorizacin fitoclimtica de la comarca

    agraria V. Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadera y Alimentacin delGobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Available on http://www.cfnavarra.es/

    agricultura/informacion agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htm. Accessed 07November 2008.

    Peralta, J., 1997. Series de vegetacin y sectorizacin fitoclimtica de la comarcaagraria VI. Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadera y Alimentacin delGobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Available on http://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htm. Accessed 07November 2008.

    Peralta, J., 2000. Series de vegetacin y sectorizacin fitoclimtica de la comarcaagraria III. Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadera y Alimentacin delGobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Available on http://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htm. Accessed 07November 2008.

    Peralta, J., 2002. Series de vegetacin y sectorizacin fitoclimtica de la comarca

    agraria VII. Departamento de Agricultura, Ganadera y Alimentacin delGobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Available on http://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htm. Accessed 07November 2008.

    Peralta, J., Olano, J.M., 2000. Series de vegetacin y sectorizacin fitoclimticade la comarca agraria IV. Departamento de Agricultura, Ganaderay Alimentacin del Gobierno de Navarra, Pamplona, Available onhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacionagraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htm. Accessed 07 November 2008.

    Pieroni, A., Quave, C.L., 2005. Traditional pharmacopoeias and medicines amongAlbaniansand Italians in southernItaly: a comparison. Journal of Ethnopharma-cology 101, 258270.

    Pinto, A.M., 2005. Etnobotnica del Parque Natural de Montesinho. Plantas, tradi-cin y saber popular en un territorio del Nordeste de Portugal. Ph.D. Thesis,Universidade de vora.

    Raja, D., 1995. Estudis etnobotnicsa la comarca de La Segarra. M.Sc. Thesis, Univer-sitat de Barcelona.

    Rigat, M., 2005. Estudis etnobotnics a la Vall de Camprodon (Alta Vall del Ter,Pirineus). M.Sc. Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona.

    Rigat, M., Bonet, M.., Garcia, S., Garnatje, T., Valls, J., 2007. Studies on pharma-ceutical ethnobotany in the high river Ter Valley (Pyrenees, Catalonia, IberianPeninsula). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113, 267277.

    SanMiguel,E.,2004.EtnobotnicadePilona (Asturias).Culturay saber popular sobrelasplantasen unconcejodel Centro-OrienteAsturiano.Ph.D.Thesis,UniversidadAutnoma de Madrid.

    Satrstegui, J.M., 1976. Notas sobre nuestra tecnologa tradicional. Cuadernos deEtnologa y Etnografa de Navarra VIII, 121134.

    Scherrer, A.M., Motti, R., Weckerle, C.S., 2005. Traditional plant use in the areasof Monte Vesole and Ascea, Cilento National Park (Campania, southern Italy).

    Journal of Ethnopharmacology 97, 129143.Trotter,R.T, Logan, M.H., 1986. Informantconsensus:a newapproachfor identifying

    potentially effective medicinal plants. In: Etkin, N.L. (Ed.), Plants in IndigenousMedicine and Diet, Behavioural Approaches. Redgrave Publishing Company,Bredfort Hills, New York, pp. 91112.

    Valls, J.,Bonet,M.., Agelet,A., 2004. Ethnobotanyof SambucusnigraL. in Catalonia(Iberian Peninsula): the integral exploitation of a natural resource in mountainregions. Economic Botany 58, 456469.

    Vanaclocha, B., Canigueral, S. (Eds.), 2003. Fitoterapia. Vademecum de prescripcin.Masson, Barcelona.Vzquez,F.M.,Suarez,M.A., Prez, A.,1997.Medicinalplantsused in theBarrosArea,

    Badajoz Province (Spain). Journal of Ethnopharmacology 55, 8185.Verde, A., 2002. Estudio etnofarmacolgico de tres reas de montana de Castilla-La

    Mancha. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Murcia.Viegi, L., Pieroni, A., Guarrera, P.M., Vangelisti, R., 2003. A review of plants used in

    folk veterinary in Italy as basis for a databank. Journal of Ethnopharmacology89, 221244.

    Villar, L., Palacn, J.M., Calvo, C., Gmez, J.D., Montserrat, G., 1987. Plantas medici-nales del Pirineo aragonsy dems tierras oscenses.CSIC-Diputacinde Huesca,Huesca.

    Williams,V.L., Witkowski,E.T.F., Balkwill,K., 2005. Applicationof diversityindicestoappraise plantavailabilityin thetraditional medicinalmarketsof Johannesburg,South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 29713001.

    Yineger, H., Kelbessa, E., Bekele, T., Lulekal, E., 2007. Ethnoveterinary medicinalplants at BaleMountains National Park,Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology112, 5570.

    http://www.cfnavarra.es/estadistica/confidex.asphttp://www.cfnavarra.es/estadistica/confidex.asphttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacionagraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacionagraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacionagraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacionagraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacionagraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/agricultura/informacion%20agraria/MapaCultivos/htm/indx.htmhttp://www.cfnavarra.es/estadistica/confidex.asp