amalgam1
TRANSCRIPT
3/5/2012
1
Amalgam
ALLOY Versus AMALGAM
• Alloy is a mixture of 2 or more metals
• AMALGAMMATION / TRITURATION – reaction when a silver based alloy is mixed with mercury, a liquid metal.
• Dental Amalgam - Is an alloy that contains mercury as one of its component
Why Amalgam?
• Inexpensive
• Ease of use
• Proven track record – >100 years
• Familiarity
• Life expectancy – 15 yrs
• Resin-free – less allergies than composite
ADVANTAGES
• Less technique sensitive
• More durable
• Less costly
• Excellent abrasion and wear resistance
• Tends to seal itself against leakage
• Bacteria do not adhere to it as strongly as n composite
DISADVANTAGES
• Esthetics, metallic color
• No bonding to tooth surface
• Extensive tooth preparation
Indications ( I,II,III, V,VI)
• Moderate to large restoration
• Restorations that are not in highly esthetic areas of mouth.
• Restorations that have heavy occlusal contacts.
• Restorations that can’t be well isolated
• Pin retained
Contraindications
• Esthetically prominent areas of teeth
Composition of Dental Amalgam
• Basic – Silver – Tin – Copper – Mercury
• Other – Zinc – Indium – Palladium
3/5/2012
2
Basic Constituents
• Silver (Ag) – increases strength – increases expansion – Decrease setting time
• Tin (Sn) – decreased strength – decreases expansion – increases setting time – Improves physical properties when compounded with Ag
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Dental Materials - Saunders
Basic Constituents
• Copper (Cu)
– increases strength
– reduces tarnish and corrosion
– reduces creep
• reduces marginal deterioration
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Tarnish
• Oxidation that attacks the surface of the Am and extends slightly below the surface.
• Contact with oxygen, chlorides, and sulfides in the mouth.
• Dark dull appearance but not destructive to Am
• Palladium and Polishing may help reduce tarnish
• The rougher the surface, the more it tends to tarnish
Corrosion
• Oxidation from interaction of 2 dissimilar metals in the presence of a solution containing electrolytes
• Galvanism
• Oxidation of one of the metals
Creep
• Refers to the gradual change in shape of the restoration from compression by the opposing dentition.
Basic Constituents • Mercury (Hg)
– activates reaction – only pure metal that is liquid
at room temperature – spherical alloys
• require less mercury – smaller surface area easier to wet
» 40 to 45% Hg
– admixed alloys • require more mercury
– lathe-cut particles more difficult to wet » 45 to 50% Hg
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
3/5/2012
3
• Zinc (Zn) • decreases oxidation of other elements
– provides better clinical performance • less marginal breakdown
– causes delayed expansion • if contaminated with moisture during condensation
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Other Constituents
• Indium (In) – decreases surface tension
• reduces amount of mercury necessary
• reduces emitted mercury vapor
– reduces creep and marginal breakdown
– increases strength
Powell J Dent Res 1989
Other Constituents
• Palladium (Pd)
– reduced corrosion
– greater luster
Mahler J Dent Res 1990
Component High copper Alloy % Low copper alloy %
Silver 40 -70 68 – 72
Tin 12 – 30 28 – 36
Copper 10 – 30 4 – 6
Zinc 0-1 0 - 2
Classifications
• Based on copper content
• Based on particle shape
Copper Content
• Low-copper alloys
– 4 to 6% Cu
• High-copper alloys
– thought that 6% Cu was maximum amount
• due to fear of excessive corrosion and expansion
– Now contain 10 to 30% Cu
• at expense of Ag
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
3/5/2012
4
Low Copper Amalgam
• “traditional” “conventional”
• COMPOSITION: ( Black’s)
• 65% SILVER
• 25% Tin
• < 6% copper
• 1% zinc
Setting Reaction of Low Copper Amalgam
(β+γ ) + Hg γ1 + γ2 + unconsumed alloy particles (β+γ )
γ – greek letter gamma
- used to designate the AgSn alloy or gamma phase
γ1 – AgHg
γ2 – SnHg
Low Copper Amalgam High Copper Am
• Compared with low copper alloys, this have become a material of choice.
• Improved mechanical properties
• Corrosion resistance
• Better marginal integrity
• Imroved performance in clinical trials
High Copper Am
• 2 types
• Admixed
• Single composition
• Both types contain more than 6 wt % copper
Admixed
• “Blended” , “admix”, or “dispersion” • These are called admixed alloys as they contain atleast 2 kinds of particles • Am made from these powders is stronger than
am made from lathe cut low copper powder, bec of inc in residual alloy particles and resultant dec in matrix
• Silver-copper particles as well as the AgSn paricles probably act as strong fillers in Am.
3/5/2012
5
Spherical High Copper Amalgams
• Unlike admixed, each particle of these alloy powders have the same chemical composition
• Thus , single composition alloys
• Single composition, high copper, spherical dental amalgams
• Have only 1 shape
• The particles are a combination of silver 60 wt % , tin 27 wt %, copper 13 wt % and other elements
Particle Shape
• Lathe cut alloy
• Spherical
• Admixed
Formed by shaving particles from a block of the alloy by a lathe
Formed by spraying molten alloy into an inert gas
Mixture of the two .
Alloy maybe made from different particle shapes to increase packing efficiency and reduce amount of Hg needed to obtain a workable mix.
Setting Transformation
• Alloy + liquid Hg = chemical reaction
• Mixture – putty like consistency
• Gradually becomes firmer
• Working time – the Am can be carved
• Initial set – it can’t be carved any more
• Once fully set , they are hard , strong
and durable
Properties of Amalgam
• Dimensional change
• Strength
• Corrosion
• Creep
Dimensional Change
• Severe contraction leaves marginal gap – initial leakage
• post-operative sensitivity
– reduced with corrosion over time Expansion leads to post operative sensitivity due to pressure
on pulp ADA specification No.1 requires amalgam neither contract or expand more than 20 um/cm Measured at 37 deg between 5 mins and 24 hours after beginning of trituration.
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
3/5/2012
6
Dimensional Change
• Net contraction – type of alloy
• spherical alloys have more contraction
– less mercury
– condensation technique • greater condensation = higher contraction
– trituration time • overtrituration causes higher contraction
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Effect of Moisture contamination
• If a zinc containing low copper, or high copper amalgam is contaminated by moisture during trituration or condensation, a large expansion can take place.
• after 3-5 days
• may continue for months reaching values < 400 um.
• DELAYED EXPANSION or SECONDARY EXPANSION
Strength
• Develops slowly – 1 hr: 40 to 60% of maximum
– 24 hrs: 90% of maximum
• Spherical alloys strengthen faster – require less mercury
• Weak in thin sections – unsupported edges fracture
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Strength
• High compressive strength
• Low tensile and shear strength
• Therefore
• Am MUST be supported by tooth structure
• Am needs sufficient bulk ( 1.5 or more)
Corrosion
• Reduces strength
• Seals margins
Sutow J Dent Res 1991
Creep
• Slow deformation of amalgam placed under a constant load – load less than that necessary to produce fracture
• Gamma 2 dramatically affects creep rate – slow strain rates produces plastic deformation
• allows gamma-1 grains to slide
• Correlates with marginal breakdown
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
3/5/2012
7
Creep
• Slow change in shape
• caused by compression
• High-copper amalgams have
creep resistance – prevention of gamma-2 phase
Clinical performance of Am Restoration
• Small amt of leakage under amalgam is unique
• Properly inserted – leakage decreases as restoration ages
• Corrosion products form along the interface between the tooth and the resto
Mercury/alloy ratio
• Historically, the only way to achieve smooth and plastic mixes was to use mercury considerably in excess of that desirable in final restoration.
• For convenional mercury –added systems, 2 techniques were employed to remove excess mercury
1. Removal of excess mercury was accomplished by squeezing or wringing themixed amalgam in a squeeze cloth
2. Additional excess mercury was worked to top during condensation of each increment
Minimal Mercury Technique Eames Technique
• Most obvious method for reducing mercury content is to reduce the original mercury/ alloy ratio.
• Sufficient mercury must be present in the original mix to provide a coherent and plastic mass after trituration
• But low enough so that the mercury content is at an acceptable level without the need to remove an appreciable amt during condensation
• Mercury content of finished should be about 50% wt% with lesser amt for spherical alloy
Proportioning
• Recommended mercury / alloy ratio for most modern lathe cut alloy is approx 1:1 or 50% mercury
spherical alloys its closer to 42% mercury
• Proper proportioning = proper mix
Proportioning
• Mercury / alloy dispensers
• Preweighed pellets or tablets
• Liquid mercury dispenser
3/5/2012
8
Proportioning
• Disposable amalgam capsules
• Preportioned mercury
Trituration
Trituration
• OBJECTIVEs :
• To provide a proper amalgamation of mercury and alloy
• Achieve a workable mass at a minimum time
• Reduce particle size leading to faster and more complete amalgamation
• Capsules serves as mortar
• a cylindrical metal or plastic piston serves as the pestle
• Sphrerical or irregular low copper alloy – low speed
• High copper – high speed
• AMALGAMATOR Speed:
• Low – 3200-3400 cycles/min
• Medium – 3700-3800 cycles/min
• High – 4000-4400 cycles/min
• INCREASED TRITURATION TIME = DECREASED WORKING AND SETTING TIME
Dentist-Controlled Variables
• Manipulation
– trituration
– condensation
– burnishing
– polishing
3/5/2012
9
Trituration
• Mixing time – refer to manufacturer
recommendations
• Overtrituration – “hot” mix
• sticks to capsule
– decreases working / setting time
– slight increase in setting contraction
• Undertrituration – grainy, crumbly mix
Properly triturated – warm, smoth- max strength , smooth
Phillip’s Science of Dental Materials 2003
Mercury content
• Sufficient mercury should be mixed with the alloy to coat the alloy particles and to allow a thorough amalgamation.
• Each particle of the alloy must be wet by the mercury; otherwise a dry , granular mix results
• Any excess of mercury left in the restoration can produce a marked reduction in strength
Condensation
• GOAL:
• To compact the alloy into the prepared cavity so that greatest possibitlity of density is attained
• Mercury rich layer is brought to the surface of the restoration, so that successiv elayers bond to each other
• A fresh amalgam mix should be condensed within 3-4 mins
Hand Condensation
• Never touch with bare hands
• Gloves
• Immediatley condensed once inserted in the cavity
• With sufficient pressure
• Ave force applied: 13.3-17.8 N or (3-4 lb)
Condensation
• All amalgams except spherical alloys are condensed by small condensers to reduce voids
• Spherical alloys: large increments and condensers to fill entire cavity.
Carving and Finishing
• Reproduce proper tooth anatomy
• Immediately after condensation
• After carving = SMOOTHED by.. BURNISHING
• Burnish the surface and margins
• After , it will still be rough at a microscopic level
• FINAL POLISHING – after 24 hours
3/5/2012
10
Side Effects of mercury
• Am restoration is possible bec of mercury.
• The use of mercury has raised concerns as well as alleged side effects that may be sustained by patients who received amalgam restorations
Allergy
• Antibody – antigen reaction • Itching, • Rashes • Sneezing • Difficulty in breathing • Swelling • Contact Dermatitis or Coombs’Type IV
hypersensitivity • But these are experienced by less tha 1% of
treated population.
Toxicity
• It is still thought that mercury toxocity from dental restoration is cause of certain undiagnosed illnesses
• And a real hazard may exist for dentists and dental assistants when mercury vapor is inhaled during mixing and placement of amalgam.
• Improvements in encapsulation technology, scrap storage, elimination of carpets and other mercury retention sites
Toxicity
• The most significant contribution to mercury assimilation from dental amalgamis
• VAPOR PHASE
• Encounter is brief
• Mercury vapor amt – NO EFFECT level
• The threshold value for mercury industry workers-
• 350 -500 ug per dya ( 40 hr /wk)
• Patients get far below the values by US federal got
• Max level occupational exposure (safe) 50 um per cubic meter of air per day
• Mercury in blood • Patients w/ Am – 0.7 ng/ml • Patients w/o Am- 0.3 ng/ml
• 1 saltwater meal per wk raised mercury level in blood : • From 2.3 to 5.1 ng/ml
• Daily normal intake of Hg: • 15 um – food • 1 ug – air • 0.4 ug - water
Potential hazards form mercury can be reduced by:
• Well ventilated Operatory
• Well sealed containers ( Am scraps, capsules)
• Proper disposals
• Spilled mercury- cleaned up as soon as posiible
• Mercury suppressant powders
• If comes in contact with skin – wash with soap and H2O