1 levels of reality – inductively? towards an inductive theory of levels of reality Łukasz lamża...

1

Levels of Reality – Inductively?

Towards an Inductive Theoryof Levels of Reality

Łukasz LamżaThe Pontifical University of John Paul II in Krakow,

Poland

'The Whitehead Metaphysical Society

2

Plan

1. Introduction and philosophical background (1 slide)

2. Methodology (7 slides)

3. Results (8 slides)

4. Discussion (1 slide)

3

Introduction

■The complexification of Nature as a starting point.(from static structure to dynamic 'structurization':if Nature exhibits some sort of structure, it is historical)

■Some related issues in philosophy:philosophy of science: intratheoretical reduction;philosophy of nature: emergence in causality;ontology: ontological emergence, levels of reality.

■Possible relationships between scientific results and philosophy.

4

Methodology

■Method in general:a) list all natural phenomena;b) group according to historical and causal

relationships;c) check for patterns.

■Obvious problem no. 1:there is no 'list of all natural phenomena'

Solution:use bibliographic databases as a first proxy(‘all that exists’ -> ‘all that is talked about’)

5

Methodology

■PACS® 2008: Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme 2008

6

Methodology

■PACS® 2008: Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme 2008

■ Ca. 9000 entries■ Hierarchical structure (max. 5 levels)■ Scope (1st level categories):

10 Elementary particles and fields20 Nuclear physics30 Atomic and molecular physics

40 Electromagnetism. Optics. Acoustics. Heat transfer. Classical Mechanics. Fluid Dynamics50 Physics of gases, plasmas and electric discharges60 Condensed matter: I70 Condensed matter: II80 Interdisciplinary physics (incl. Chemistry, Rheology, Biological

physics, Materials science etc.)90 Geophysics, Astronomy and Astrophysics

7

Methodology

■PACS® 2008: Physics and Astronomy Classification Scheme 2008

■Hierarchical structure:

90. Geophysics, Astronomy and Astrophysics 91. Solid Earth physics 91.50 Marine geology 91.50.Cw Beach and coastal processes

20. Nuclear physics 26. Nuclear astrophysics 26.20 Hydrostatic stellar nucleosynthesis 26.20.Fj Stellar helium burning

8

Methodology

■PACS-related problems:From bibliographic categories to natural entities‘Physico-centrism’

> focus on everything up to the rise of biological systems

■General problems of quantitative studies of natural complexification:What is an ‘object’?What is an 'unbalanced view' of complexity?

(Why is the emergence of a new kind of animal, e.g. human, more important than the emergence of a new kind of chemical substance?)

9

Methodology

?

10

Methodology

■The final list of 'natural objects':349 level-3 PACS categories, e.g.

13.15 Neutrino interactions23.60 Alpha decay36.20 Macromolecules and polymer molecules44.25 Natural convection52.30 Plasma dynamics and flow61.30 Liquid crystals73.25 Surface conductivity87.17 Subcellular structure and processes98.20 Stellar clusters and associations

11

Results

■The scheme of natural history used:

12

Results

13

Results

1. Natural complexification is both localized and inhomogeneous:

114 'objects' (33% of all objects) appear within the Big Bang – and are inherited by all of physical space – but the rest is confined to certain locations (e.g. 14 objects [4%] are present only in planetary atmospheres and hydrospheres).

There are multiple 'chemistries' or 'mineralogies', just like there are multiple ‘geologies’: the development of any group of objects follows different paths in different places.

14

Results

15

Results

2. Natural complexification is episodic.There are 4 major episodes of intensive complexification:

Big Bang [32,6%]Gaseous envelopes of evolved stars [15,4%]Protoplanetary disks [21,8%]Young solid-surface planets [14,0%]

Together: 83,8% of all complexification in just 4 short episodes.

16

Results

17

Results

3. Natural complexification does not follow any rigid 'group hierarchy'.

some 'astrophysical' phenomena rely on 'nuclear' phenomena

[e.g. envelopes of supernovae are heated mostly through radioactive decay]

some 'nuclear' phenomena rely on 'astrophysical' phenomena

[e.g. most heavy nuclei form only in stars above certain mass]

some 'chemical' phenomena rely on 'macro-physical' phenomena

[e.g. certain chemical reactions occur only on solid surfaces]

some 'macro-physical' phenomena rely on 'chemical' phenomena

[e.g. many rheological phenomena occur only in certain chemically-defined materials]

a dramatic example: our ‘discovery’ of superconductivity

18

Results

19

Results

20

Discussion

■Future developments:Universal Decimal Classification (better

representation of non-physical disciplines);methods of assessing 'importances' of natural

groupings;

possibility of making the project less philosophically naïve? (ontological decisions?)

21

Levels of Reality - Inductively?

Thank you for your attention!

Łukasz Lamża

The Pontifical University of John Paul II

The Whitehead Metaphysical Society

email: lukasz.lamza@gmail.com