2018 fleet barometer€¦ · fieldwork period target quotas sample duration of interview cati...
Post on 21-Aug-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2018 FLEET BAROMETERThe Netherlands
January 2018 / Survey n°1700814
Table of content
2
I FLEET PROFILE
II FINANCING
III TELEMATICS
IV PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY
p.14
p.43
p.49
p.59
V ROAD SAFETY p.82
PERIMETER OF THE STUDY – FOCUS EUROPE
3
METHODOLOGY
DATA COLLECTION
METHODFIELDWORK PERIOD TARGET QUOTAS SAMPLE
DURATION OF
INTERVIEW
CATI System
(Computer Assisted
Telephone Interviewing)
Fleet managers in
companies of all industries
using at least
1 corporate vehicle
Company size
& sector
3 718 interviews including
3 313 through Europe
405 out of Europe
10 minutes
on average
JAN
15
FEB
6
4
Companies with 10 to 99 employees
62 interviews
Companies with 100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees
77 interviews
Companies with 250 / 500 / 1 000 employees and more
61 interviews
1 to 99
employees
162 interviews
More than 100
employees
138 interviews
Perimeter of the survey: companies owning at least 1 vehicle
Companies with less than 10 employees
100 interviews
5
SAMPLE FOR THE NETHERLANDS
6
Company size
& sector
This sample structure was set up in order to be roughly representative of the number of cars registered by companies for each
company size segment and activity sector as well as to allow comparisons between countries on a similar bases.
In the following slides, no additional weighting of the data are applied to company sizes or activity sectors segments.
Total
Construction 31 (31%) 20 (32%) 10 (13%) 11 (18%) 72 (24%)
Industry 11 (11%) 13 (21%) 22 (29%) 9 (15%) 55 (18%)
Services 23 (23%) 10 (16%) 8 (10%) 17 (28%) 58 (19%)
Trade 35 (35%) 19 (31%) 37 (48%) 24 (39%) 115 (38%)
TOTAL 100 (100%) 62 (100%) 77 (100%) 61 (100%) 300 (100%)
Weight of each
company size
segment
33% 21% 26% 20% 100%
NUMBER OF INTERVIEWS CONDUCTED IN THE NETHERLANDS
SAMPLE
Less than 10 employees
10 to 99 employees
100 to 249 employees
100 to 499 employees
100 to 999 employees
250 employees and more
500 employees and more
1000 employees and more
FR IT UK NL ES BE CZ DE PL PT CH TR
7
PICTOGRAMS
* Fleet size: the size of the fleet has been defined according to the total number of vehicles given in question A5.
10 – 99 employees
100 to 249 / 499 / 999 employees
250 / 500 / 1000 employees
and more
Less than 10 employees
10 – 49 vehicles
50 vehicles and more
1 – 9 vehicles
Company size Fleet size*
8
MAIN RESULTS
MAIN RESULTS
Dutch managers appear to be more
mature than other European ones.
They are pushing for switch to new
energies/technologies, especially in
largest companies.
10
#1A positive trend regarding the fleet
growth potential, especially for
large and very large companies.
#2
#3
#4
A non negligible impact of the new
WLTP test for fleet policies.
CO2 emissions are taken into
account by most fleet managers
#5Greater use of telematics compared
with the European average. Major
development across medium-sized
and large fleets.
#6Improvement of driver safety and
behaviour more taken into account
in the use of telematics.
#7 A limited interest in mobility budget.
MAIN RESULTS
11
#1 – A positive trend regarding the fleet growth potential, especially for large and very large companies.
Regardless of the vehicle size or fleet segment, except for smaller companies, the proportion of companies anticipating a growth in fleet
size is greater than that of companies anticipating a decrease. Although the scores are generally lower than the European average, the
dynamism level for 2018 reaches its highest score, in particular with largest companies (with balances of +16 and +11 respectively).
#2 – Dutch managers appear to be more mature than other European ones. They are pushing for switch to new
energies/technologies, especially in largest companies.
New technology solutions like hybrid, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles are already widespread across Dutch companies, primarily in
large and very large companies. These companies are leaders as the Netherlands rank 3rd in Europe (behind Belgium and the UK)
amongst countries that most use these new energy solutions. 58% of Dutch companies claim that they have already incorporated these
new energy sources into their vehicle fleet.
#3 – A non negligible impact of the new WLTP test on fleet policies.
46% of Dutch fleet managers claim that the new WLTP test has or will have an impact on their fleet policy. 25% of them say that it already
has an impact in 2018. The country's scores are very much in line with the European level. Fleet managers in the largest companies claim
to have been the most affected (69% vs 62% in Europe).
MAIN RESULTS
#4 – CO2 emissions are taken into account by most fleet managers
61% of Dutch fleet managers claim to take CO2 emissions into account for their fleet policy. The rate even reaches 80% for larger
companies, in line with European scores.
68% of companies have already introduced - or consider introducing - measures to reduce CO2 emissions for mobility solutions (43%
have introduced this type of measure).
The largest companies are leaders in the subject, which is a major concern for 87% of them.
#5 – Greater use of telematics compared with the European average. Major development across medium-sized and large fleets.
With a telematics use rate of 28%, the Netherlands show better results than their European neighbours (19%), particularly for the largest
companies and fleets.
Fleet managers for the largest fleets show the most enthusiasm for this technology and 58% of them claim that they use it, making for an
increase of 7 points compared to 2017. For medium-sized fleets, the use rate has significantly increased from 27% last year to 46% this
year.
#6 – Improvement of driver safety and behaviour more taken into account in the use of telematics.
Although telematics is chiefly used to locate vehicles (71%) and optimise employees' routes (59%), Dutch fleet managers are looking to
use it more in favour of improving driver safety.
In fact, use regarding driver safety and behaviour has dramatically stepped up, with smallest (+21 and +10 respectively) and largest (+15
and +4) companies alike.
12
MAIN RESULTS
#7 – A limited interest in mobility budget.
In total, 12% of Dutch fleet managers claim to be interested in the introduction of a mobility budget in their company and only 7% show
definite interest.
This is a fairly disappointing result, although managers of the largest companies are slightly more enthusiastic with a rate of interest of
18% (11% with definite interest). With 26% of interest, managers of the largest fleets are those with best insight into the mobility budget
(16% claim to have introduced it in their company).
13
I - FLEET PROFILE
A. FLEET CHARACTERISTICS
I - FLEET PROFILE
NUMBER OF VEHICLES IN FLEET
10 to 99 vehicles
100 to 499 vehicles
500 vehicles and more
Total
A5. Can you please tell me the total number of vehicles of less than 3.5 tons in your fleet?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
2% 3%10% 14%9% 9%
4%11%
38% 30%33% 31%
1% 1%
39%30%
62%59%
44%45%
56% 57%
99% 99%
61%70%
34% 30%
8% 12%
1 to 9 vehicles
16
FLEET GROWTH POTENTIALby company size
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will increase or decrease
Balance 2017 Balance 2014
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
Balance 2015Balance 2018
+7 +8 +1 -1
+13 +11 +10 +9
-1 +5 -6 +4
+8 +8 +4 +6
+6 +12 +13 0
+12 +9 +9 +6
+16 +9 +3 +2
+16 +14 +10 +10
+11 +8 -4 -12
+17 +15 +20 +15
14%
19%
5%
13%
11%
17%
19%
21%
23%
27%
6%
6%
6%
4%
5%
4%
4%
6%
11%
9%
IncreaseDecrease
Total
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
17
FLEET GROWTH POTENTIALby fleet size
Balance 2017 Balance 2014
Balance = Fleet growth will increase – Fleet growth will decrease
Balance 2015Balance 2018
+7 +8 +1 -1
+13 +11 +10 +9
+3 +7 -1 +5
+8 +7 +5 +6
+14 +8 +15 -2
+12 +13 +15 +9
+11 +11 -7 -9
+27 +19 +20 +16
14%
19%
8%
13%
17%
19%
24%
35%
6%
6%
5%
5%
3%
7%
13%
9%
IncreaseDecrease
Total
% which think that the total number of vehicles of their company fleet will increase or decrease
A8. In the next three years, do you think that the total number of vehicles in your company fleet will?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
18
Total
Average in years
HOW LONG THE COMPANY KEEPS ITS VEHICLEby company size
19
5,7 6,1 6,1 5,4 5,2
5,7 6,2 6,3 5,4 5,0
A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold (new precision added for the 2018 questionnaire) or giving back to the leasing
company?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Total
Average in years
HOW LONG THE COMPANY KEEPS ITS VEHICLEby fleet size
20
5,7 5,9 4,8 6,4
5,7 6,2 5,4 4,8
A25. On average, how long do you keep your vehicles before being sold (new precision added for the 2018 questionnaire) or giving back to the leasing
company?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
How long the company keeps its vehicles
Fleet growth potential
balance +7(Balance = % which think that the total number of
vehicles of their company fleet will increase –
decrease)
2018 Fleet Barometer - The Netherlands
-1 +6 +16 +11
+8 +12 +16 +17
FLEET PROFILE – CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET
Average in years
5,7 5,7
6,1 6,1 5,4 5,2
6,2 6,3 5,4 5,0
B. ENERGY MIX
I - FLEET PROFILE
USE OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIESby company size
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
TotalAlready implemented
44%23%
29%13%
30%9%
4%3%
3%4%
26%11%
1%1%
Proportion of companies having already implemented new energies or technologies in their fleet (in at least one of their fleet vehicles)
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
23
Already
implemented
12%9%
7%4%
4%2%
0%1%
2%3%
5%2%
1%<1%
44%16%
27%8%
26%6%
0%2%
6%4%
19%5%
2%1%
68%28%
45%16%
45%12%
6%4%
5%4%
35%11%
1%1%
69%48%
48%27%
57%22%
11%8%
0%6%
57%30%
2%2%
USE OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by fleet size
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
TotalAlready implemented
24
Already
implemented
44%23%
29%13%
30%9%
4%3%
3%4%
26%11%
1%1%
21%12%
12%5%
10%3%
0%1%
4%4%
11%3%
1%1%
69%29%
44%14%
49%11%
6%4%
6%5%
34%12%
3%1%
81%53%
60%33%
63%26%
13%8%
0%5%
58%32%
0%3%
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Proportion of companies having already implemented new energies or technologies in their fleet (in at least one of their fleet vehicles)
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by company size
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
Already implemented
+ considered
Total
58%44%
37%29%
40%23%
8%8%
6%8%
45%26%
9%7%
25
Considered in the next 3 years
Already implemented
27%32%
13%20%
14%16%
1%5%
4%8%
18%16%
7%6%
60%37%
39%23%
34%17%
0%6%
6%7%
42%18%
10%5%
78%46%
51%31%
55%24%
12%8%
9%8%
57%27%
9%7%
82%68%
59%47%
72%40%
21%15%
7%11%
79%52%
11%11%
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet
(in at least one of their fleet vehicles)
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by fleet size
80%47%
54%30%
59%25%
13%8%
7%8%
59%26%
9%7%
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
Already implemented
+ considered
Total
58%44%
37%29%
40%23%
8%8%
6%8%
45%26%
9%7%
90%73%
66%53%
73%45%
18%17%
6%11%
79%56%
13%13%
37%33%
20%20%
21%16%
2%5%
6%8%
27%17%
8%5%
26
Considered in the next 3 years
Already implemented
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet
(in at least one of their fleet vehicles)
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by company size
27
+
33%
40% 40%
22%24%
23%
18%
27%
22%
4%
4%
1%
4%
5%5%
14% 19%
27%
6%
3%
8%
2015 2017 2018
Already implemented
+ considered
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years
new energies or technologies in their fleet
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES - by company size
28
+Already implemented
+ considered
67%
88%
80%
52%
72%
54%43%
70%
62%
15% 15% 16%
8% 12%
8%
39%
56%
67%
6%5%
10%
2015 2017 2018
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
53% 53%57%
43%40% 40%
16%24%
29%
4%7%
4%
2%
6%
1%
29% 29%
40%
3%4% 2%
2015 2017 2018
At least one technology
Hybrid
Plug-in Hybrid
CNG (Compressed Natural Gas)
LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas)
Electric Vehicle
Fuel Cell Electric / Hydrogen
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years
new energies or technologies in their fleet
CH 51%
IT 45%
TR 41%
FR 41%
ES 39%
DE 38%
PL 36%
PT 36%
CZ 10%
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALOF NEW ENERGIES OR TECHNOLOGIES: At least one technology
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
64%
61%58%
#1 BE
#2 UK
#3 NL
44%
TOP 3
29
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years new energies or technologies in their fleet (hybrid,
plug-in hybrid, CNG, LPG, electric vehicle or fuel cell electric / hydrogen)
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
HYBRYD DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
53%
51%37%
#1 UK
#2 BE
#3 NL
29%
TOP 3
30
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years hybrid technology in their fleet
CH 36%
FR 30%
ES 30%
IT 22%
PT 22%
PL 19%
DE 16%
TR 15%
CZ 3%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
PLUG-IN HYBRID DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
46%
43%40%
#1 UK
#2 BE
#3 NL
23%
TOP 3
31
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years plug-in hybrid technology in their fleet
CH 25%
FR 22%
PT 20%
ES 16%
DE 15%
IT 14%
PL 14%
TR 13%
CZ 1%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
CNG / COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
19%
18%11%
#1 BE
#2 IT
#3 UK
8%
TOP 3
32
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years CNG (compressed natural gas) technology in their fleet
ES 10%
TR 9%
NL 8%
CH 7%
DE 7%
CZ 3%
PT 3%
PL 3%
FR 2%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
LPG / LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
19%
17%16%
#1 TR
#2 PL
#3 IT
8%
TOP 3
33
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) technology in their fleet
UK 14%
ES 11%
BE 8%
DE 7%
NL 6%
CH 6%
PT 4%
CZ 3%
FR 1%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
45%
42%37%
#1 NL
#2 UK
#3 BE
26%
TOP 3
34
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years electric vehicle technology in their fleet
CH 34%
DE 28%
FR 26%
ES 25%
PT 23%
IT 15%
TR 15%
PL 11%
CZ 3%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
FUEL CELL ELECTRIC / HYDROGEN DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
% Already implemented+ considered in the next 3 years
22%
10%9%
#1 UK
#2 ES
#3 NL
7%
TOP 3
35
Proportion of companies having already or considering to implement in the next 3 years fuel cell electric / hydrogen technology in their fleet
CH 8%
BE 8%
TR 8%
PT 5%
PL 5%
IT 4%
DE 4%
FR 3%
CZ < 1%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
E28. Amongst the following technologies, which one do you consider to use? Response scale: Already implemented, considered in the next 3 years,
considered but later, not considered. Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
IMPACT OF THE WLTP TESTby company size
Already or
expected
% Yes, already
% Yes, already
Already or
expected
Total
NL17. Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test. Has, or will the new higher and more
realistic fuel consumption levels and related CO2 emissions impact on your fleet policy? Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
36
25% 12% 13% 34% 46%
18% 11% 11% 20% 31%
44% 36% 36% 46% 62%
46% 33% 44% 48% 69%
Proportion of companies having already or expecting to be impacted in the next 3 years by the new WLTP test
IMPACT OF THE WLTP TESTby fleet size
Already or
expected
% Yes, already
% Yes, already
Already or
expected
Total
NL17. Today, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions are determined with a new, more realistic test cycle: the WLTP-test. Has, or will the new higher and more
realistic fuel consumption levels and related CO2 emissions impact on your fleet policy? Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
37
25% 14% 26% 52%
18% 11% 19% 35%
44% 35% 47% 67%
46% 36% 46% 76%
Proportion of companies having already or expecting to be impacted in the next 3 years by the new WLTP test
ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS LINKED TO MOBILITY - by company size
NL18. Does your company take action to further reduce your CO2 emissions linked to mobility?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
38
Already or
considered
% Yes, already
Total
68% 63% 60% 65% 87%
43% 36% 34% 42% 67%
Proportion of companies having already or considering to take action in the next 3 years to further reduce CO2 emissions linked to mobility
ACTIONS TAKEN TO REDUCE CO2 EMISSIONS LINKED TO MOBILITY - by fleet size
Already or
considered
% Yes, already
NL18. Does your company take action to further reduce your CO2 emissions linked to mobility?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
39
Total
68% 60% 67% 89%
43% 33% 47% 68%
Proportion of companies having already or considering to take action in the next 3 years to further reduce CO2 emissions linked to mobility
Total
EMISSIONS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE CAR POLICY by company size
40
NOx (nitrogen oxyde)
Fine particles
CO2 (Carbon dioxyde)
Other polluting emissions
None of these
15%
18%
25%
26%
61%
59%
0%
6%
33%
30%
9%
14%
17%
25%
53%
49%
0%
6%
43%
39%
15%
16%
28%
25%
45%
49%
0%
8%
47%
38%
13%
20%
25%
29%
68%
66%
0%
6%
25%
23%
29%
26%
33%
27%
80%
75%
0%
5%
16%
16%
NL19. Which of the following emissions do you take into account in your company car policy? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles, without “don’t know”
Proportion of companies taking into account the following pollutant emission in their fleet policy
EMISSIONS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT IN THE CAR POLICY by fleet size
41
Total
NOx (nitrogen oxyde)
Fine particles
CO2 (Carbon dioxyde)
Other polluting emissions
None of these
15%
18%
25%
26%
61%
59%
0%
6%
33%
30%
12%
15%
20%
25%
53%
51%
0%
7%
42%
37%
18%
20%
32%
27%
57%
60%
0%
8%
36%
27%
21%
25%
28%
28%
85%
81%
0%
4%
9%
13%
NL19. Which of the following emissions do you take into account in your company car policy? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles, without “don’t know”
Proportion of companies taking into account the following pollutant emission in their fleet policy
422018 Fleet Barometer – The Netherlands
FLEET PROFILE – ENERGY MIX
Development potential of new energies/technologies
Already implemented
+ considered
Electric Vehicle
Plug-in Hybrid
Hybrid
45%
40%
37%
26%
23%
29%
64%
61% 58%
#1 BE
#2 UK#3 NL
TOP 3At least one
technology
CO2 taken into account in
the car policy
61% 80%
Impact of the WLTP test
46% 44%
Already or expected in the next 3 years
33%
44%
48%
69%
#3
#3
#1
II - FINANCING
INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby company size
Yes
% Yes, certainly
% Yes, certainly
Yes
Total
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
44
12% 1% 6% 22% 21%
9% 5% 6% 11% 15%
23% 18% 19% 25% 31%
20% 4% 15% 32% 36%
Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing
INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby company size
Yes
% Yes, certainly
% Yes, certainly
Yes
Total
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
45
12% 1% 6% 22% 21%
9% 5% 6% 11% 15%
23% 18% 19% 25% 31%
20% 4% 15% 32% 36%(18%) (8%) (14%) (26%) (30%)
(9%) (5%) (4%) (14%) (16%)
(24%) (21%) (22%) (26%) (31%)
(9%) (6%) (7%) (10%) (17%)
(Reminder of 2017 results)
Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing
INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby fleet size
Yes
% Yes, certainly
% Yes, certainly
Yes
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
46
Total
12% 3% 19% 27%
9% 5% 9% 20%
23% 18% 22% 36%
20% 9% 27% 42%
Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing
INTENTION TO DEVELOP OPERATING LEASINGby fleet size
Yes
% Yes, certainly
% Yes, certainly
Yes
B8bis. In the next three years, do you intend to develop Operating Leasing in order to finance your corporate fleet?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
47
Total
12% 3% 19% 27%
9% 5% 9% 20%
23% 18% 22% 36%
20% 9% 27% 42%(18%) (8%) (21%) (34%)
(9%) (3%) (10%) (20%)
(24%) (20%) (29%) (33%)
(9%) (5%) (12%) (18%)
(Reminder of 2017 results)
Proportion of companies having the intention to develop operational leasing
FINANCING METHOD
Intention to develop Operating leasing (in the next three years)
2018 Fleet Barometer – The Netherlands
Total
20% 4% 15% 32% 36%
23% 18% 19% 25% 31%
III - TELEMATICS
USE OF TELEMATICSby company size
Total
50
E23. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle
location... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not
include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones.
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
28% 7% 24% 38% 56%
19% 8% 17% 26% 30%
Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their fleet
19% 8% 17% 26% 30%
USE OF TELEMATICSby company size
Total
51
E23. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle
location... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not
include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones.
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
(20%) (9%) (19%) (25%) (33%)
28% 7% 24% 38% 56%(30%) (12%) (36%) (36%) (43%)
(Reminder of 2017 results)
Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their fleet
USE OF TELEMATICSby fleet size
Total
52
E23. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle
location... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not
include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones.
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
28% 10% 46% 58%
19% 10% 27% 37%
Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their fleet
19% 10% 27% 37%
USE OF TELEMATICSby fleet size
Total
53
E23. Have you implemented Telematics within your fleet? Telematics enables transmission of data to monitor fuel consumption, driver behaviour, vehicle
location... from vehicles on the move. Data is transmitted by means of an original or after sales equipment or box installed in the vehicle. Telematics do not
include data transmission by the mean of the users’ smartphones.
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
(20%) (12%) (26%) (37%)
28% 10% 46% 58%(30%) (20%) (27%) (51%)
(Reminder of 2017 results)
Proportion of companies having implemented telematics in their fleet
Total
PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICSby company size
54
Improve drivers safety
Improve drivers behaviours
Locate vehicles
Optimize journeys
Reduce fleet costs
Other: 26% 14% 35%
14% 13% 16%
44%
60%
45%
55%
71%
74%
59%
61%
45%
59%
48%
61%
48%
59%
72%
75%
59%
63%
52%
58%
44%
62%
44%
56%
65%
67%
59%
59%
44%
64%
Small basis
Very low
basis (<20)
No results
displayed
Very low
basis (<20)
No results
displayed
E25. For which reasons do you use telematics within your company? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies which has implemented telematics
PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICSby company size
55
+
Improve drivers safety
Improve drivers behaviours
Locate vehicles
Optimize journeys
Reduce fleet costs
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
36%
15%
41%
31%
77%
64%
59%
59%
36%
28%
56%
49%
52%
46%
80%
72%
60%
54%
57%
46%
Small basis
E25. For which reasons do you use telematics within your company? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies which has implemented telematics
PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICSby company size
56
+
Improve drivers safety
Improve drivers behaviours
Locate vehicles
Optimize journeys
Reduce fleet costs
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
46%
31%
46%
42%
68%
55%
59%
56%
48%
51%
61%
54%
57%
53%
71%
66%
61%
54%
61%
60%
E25. For which reasons do you use telematics within your company? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies which has implemented telematics
PURPOSES FOR USING TELEMATICSby fleet size
57
Total
Improve drivers safety
Improve drivers behaviours
Locate vehicles
Optimize journeys
Reduce fleet costs
Other: 26% 19% 31%
14% 11% 17%
44%
60%
45%
55%
71%
74%
59%
61%
45%
59%
44%
57%
56%
56%
75%
77%
63%
61%
47%
58%
50%
64%
42%
58%
69%
71%
53%
59%
53%
63%
Very low basis
(<20)
No results
displayed
E25. For which reasons do you use telematics within your company? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies which has implemented telematics
TELEMATICS
Use of telematics
Purposes for using telematics
2018 Fleet Barometer – The Netherlands
Total
19%
28% 7% 24% 38% 56%
8% 17% 26% 30%
Locate vehicles
71% 74%
Optimize journeys
59% 61%
IV - PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY
USE OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVES by company size
TotalAlready using
60
Already using
14%
18%
22%
23%
13%
15%
1%
8%
12%
13%
4%
8%
5%
13%
23%
22%
8%
15%
22%
24%
30%
26%
19%
17%
34%
34%
30%
38%
26%
24%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
34% 14% 29% 48% 56%
37% 21% 35% 43% 57%
Proportion of companies already using the following mobility alternatives
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
USE OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby fleet size
TotalAlready using
61
Already using
14%
18%
22%
23%
13%
15%
4%
11%
15%
16%
5%
11%
20%
27%
33%
30%
24%
19%
34%
31%
31%
35%
23%
23%
34% 19% 50% 58%
37% 27% 47% 54%
Proportion of companies already using the following mobility alternatives
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby company size
Already using
+ considered
Total
18%
23%
26%
28%
19%
22%
62
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
2%
12%
12%
15%
6%
13%
6%
16%
26%
25%
11%
20%
27%
28%
32%
31%
26%
25%
46%
44%
39%
46%
38%
35%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
40% 16% 35% 53% 69%
44% 27% 41% 51% 67%
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby fleet size
Already using
+ considered
Total
63
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
18%
23%
26%
28%
19%
22%
5%
14%
16%
19%
7%
16%
24%
30%
37%
34%
26%
24%
48%
43%
39%
44%
42%
37%
40% 22% 56% 73%
44% 33% 53% 67%
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby company size
64
+
Already implemented
+ considered
4%
8%
17%
26%
8%
9%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
13%
13%
19%
21%
15%
16%
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
32%
34%
23%
33%
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESby company size
65
+
36%
42%
36%
39%
31%
30%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
Already implemented
+ considered
35%
34%
38%
37%
30%
30%
Considered in the next 3 years
Already using
60%
65%
58%
59%
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives? Already using, Considered in the next 3 years, Not interested
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESCar sharing
% Already using+ considered in the next 3 years
47%
35%34%
#1 TR
#2 CZ
#3 UK
23%
FR 29%
PL 28%
BE 27%
CH 24%
PT 22%
ES 19%
NL 18%
IT 14%
DE 7%
TOP 3
66
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL OF MOBILITY ALTERNATIVESRide sharing
% Already using+ considered in the next 3 years
48%
42%39%
#1 UK
#2 CZ
#3 TR
28%
BE 31%
CH 29%
PL 28%
FR 27%
NL 26%
ES 22%
PT 19%
IT 18%
DE 13%
TOP 3
67
MM9. In the next 3 years, would you consider using the following alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
Proportion of companies already using or considering to use in the next 3 years the following mobility alternatives
PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by company size
TotalYes certainly
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
68
Yes certainly
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
5%
2%
5%
2%
5%
2%
0%
1%
4%
1%
0%
1%
5%
2%
5%
2%
5%
1%
6%
2%
6%
2%
5%
1%
10%
4%
7%
4%
11%
3%
10% 4% 11% 8% 20%
4% 3% 4% 3% 8%
PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by fleet size
TotalYes certainly
69
Yes certainly
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
5%
2%
5%
2%
5%
2%
2%
1%
4%
2%
2%
1%
6%
2%
9%
3%
7%
1%
10%
5%
5%
3%
10%
3%
10% 6% 11% 18%
4% 3% 4% 7%
PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by company size
YES
Total
70
Yes probably
Yes certainly
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
7%
6%
9%
6%
8%
6%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
0%
3%
7%
3%
1%
3%
5%
3%
6%
5%
5%
4%
8%
7%
9%
7%
14%
7%
18%
13%
16%
11%
15%
10%
17% 7% 13% 19% 33%
12% 7% 9% 13% 22%
PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by fleet size
YES
Total
71
Yes probably
Yes certainly
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
7%
6%
9%
6%
8%
6%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
2%
4%
7%
4%
2%
4%
9%
5%
14%
6%
11%
5%
16%
14%
11%
12%
19%
12%
17% 8% 21% 34%
12% 8% 11% 23%
PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by company size
72
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
+
YES
2%
3%
7%
13%
2%
3%
At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
3%
3%
4%
5%
3%
4%
Yes probably
Yes certainly
9%
15%
7%
9%
PROPORTION OF COMPANIES READY TO GIVE UP ALL OR PART OF THEIR COMPANY CARS FOR ALTERNATIVE MOBILITY SOLUTIONS - by company size
73
MM10. And would you give up all or part of your company cars for such alternatives?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
+
12%
16%
12%
14%
14%
14%
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
2018
2017
YESYes probably
Yes certainly
25%
27%At least one of the following
alternatives
Car sharing
Ride sharing
Mobility budget or card
10%
9%
9%
10%
8%
9%
17%
18%
INTEREST IN MOBILITY BUDGETby company size
NL8. With a mobility budget, you give employees the choice and financial responsibility of the mobility forms you provide. Are you interested in
mobility budget?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
74
Yes
% Yes, certrainly
Already in place in the company:
Total
12% 4% 13% 18% 18%
7% 3% 6% 10% 11%
5% 0% 2% 8% 15%
INTEREST IN MOBILITY BUDGET by fleet size
Yes
75
% Yes, certrainly
Already in place in the company:
NL8. With a mobility budget, you give employees the choice and financial responsibility of the mobility forms you provide. Are you interested in
mobility budget?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Total
12% 6% 16% 26%
7% 4% 10% 15%
5% 1% 6% 16%
ROLE OF A MOBILITY BUDGETby company size
NL9. Which role takes a mobility budget in your working conditions?
Basis: companies interested in mobility budget
76
Only usable for mobility costs
Only usable for a lease
vehicle
We have a cafeteria model
None
26%
21%
13%
19%
Total
Other:
25%
15%
15%
20%
25%
25%
15%
15%
Small basis Small basis
15% 20% 10%
Very low
basis (<20)
No results
displayed
Very low
basis (<20)
No results
displayed
INTEREST IN MOBILITY PLATFORMby company size
NL12. With a mobility platform you have insight into all the costs related to the mobility of your employees. Are you interested in such a platform?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
77
Yes
% Yes, certrainly
Already in place in the company:
Total
13% 3% 15% 17% 25%
6% 3% 2% 6% 16%
6% 0% 2% 9% 16%
INTEREST IN MOBILITY PLATFORMby fleet size
Yes
78
% Yes, certrainly
NL12. With a mobility platform you have insight into all the costs related to the mobility of your employees. Are you interested in such a platform?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Already in place in the company:
Total
13% 8% 16% 26%
6% 4% 4% 16%
6% 1% 9% 16%
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED FROM A MOBILITY PLATFORMby company size
NL7bis. At what level do you expect to gain the most profit with a mobility platform? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies interested in mobility platform or already in place in company
79
Corporate Social
Responsibility
Optimisation of mobility costs
Reduce administrative work
Employee satisfaction
Total
Other:
55%
55%
38%
31%
Small basis Small basis
3% 5% 4%
55%
55%
35%
35%
52%
48%
40%
24%
ADVANTAGES EXPECTED FROM A MOBILITY PLATFORMby fleet size
80
NL7bis. At what level do you expect to gain the most profit with a mobility platform? Items read out by the interviewer – Multiple answers possible
Basis: companies interested in mobility platform or already in place in company
Total
Other:
Corporate Social Responsibility
Optimisation of mobility costs
Reduce administrative work
Employee satisfaction
55%
55%
38%
31%
50%
54%
42%
31%
3% 8%
Small basis
PERSPECTIVE IN TERMS OF CORPORATE MOBILITY
Development potential of mobility alternatives
Ride sharing
Car sharing
26% 32% 39%
18% 27% 46%
19% 26% 38%Mobility budget
Already using
+ considered
2018 Fleet Barometer – The Netherlands
#10
#8
Already in place
+ certainly interested
+ probably interested
V- ROAD SAFETY
POLICY ON THE USE OF MOBILE PHONES IN THE CARby company size
83
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
% Yes, already
% Yes, already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
% Yes,
already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
Make or receive
phone calls
The use of apps
except for navigation
The use of
navigation apps
Total
61% 53% 55% 69% 72%
55% 52% 47% 62% 59%
30% 19% 34% 32% 41%
22% 18% 26% 21% 25%
42% 35% 44% 42% 54%
33% 30% 35% 36% 33%
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%% of companies having or considering to have in the next 3 years a policy on the use of mobile phones in the car
with regards to the following topics (NL15)
POLICY ON THE USE OF MOBILE PHONES IN THE CARby fleet size
84
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
% Yes, already
% Yes, already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
% Yes,
already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
Make or receive
phone calls
The use of apps
except for navigation
The use of
navigation apps
Total
61% 54% 74% 66%
55% 51% 67% 52%
30% 22% 37% 44%
22% 17% 30% 24%
42% 35% 50% 55%
33% 29% 41% 35%
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%% of companies having or considering to have in the next 3 years a policy on the use of mobile phones in the car
with regards to the following topics (NL15)
ACTIONS TAKEN IN ORDER TO INCREASE ROAD SAFETYby company size
85
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
% Yes, already
% Yes, already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
E-learning
Real world driving
style analysis
% Yes,
already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
Smartphone blocking
Total
14% 5% 13% 13% 30%
6% 2% 3% 5% 16%
16% 3% 19% 18% 31%
9% 3% 8% 12% 16%
21% 17% 18% 19% 34%
8% 8% 6% 9% 7%
NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
ACTIONS TAKEN IN ORDER TO INCREASE ROAD SAFETYby fleet size
86
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
% Yes, already
% Yes, already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
E-learning
Real world driving
style analysis
% Yes,
already
Already or
considered in
the next 3 years
Smartphone blocking
NL16. In order to increase road safety, does your company set up the following actions?
Basis: companies with corporate vehicles = 100%
Total
14% 6% 17% 31%
6% 1% 7% 18%
16% 7% 20% 37%
9% 4% 13% 18%
21% 18% 23% 27%
8% 7% 13% 5%
ROAD SAFETY
Policy on the use of mobile Phones in the car
2018 Fleet Barometer – The Netherlands
Total
61% 53% 55% 69% 72%
30% 19% 34% 32% 41%
42% 35% 44% 42% 54%
Make or receive phone
calls
The use of apps except
for navigation
The use of navigation
apps
Actions taken in order to increase road safety
E-learning
14%
Real world driving style
analysis
16%
Smartphone blocking
21%30% 31% 34%
Already or considered
in the next 3 years
Already or considered
in the next 3 years
88
T H A N K Y O U
88
top related