a methodology for choosing

Technology AdoptionA methodology for choosing between good, better and best

Innovations

COHERE 2013A methodology for choosing between good, better and bestRichard Rush

Introduction

Innovation Adoption

What do we care about adoption?

Stages of Adoption

Knowledge

Persuasion

Decision

Implementation

Confirmation

Adopter “Cohorts”

Governance for Ed Tech

Why Governance?

Forms of Governan

ce

Committees and

Councils

Distributed Decisions

Independent UsersCentral

Directed

Cascade

Cascade ModelBoard of Governors

Institutional Strategic Plans

Executive Priorities

Academic Priorities

Ed Tech Steering Committee

Project Team Execution

Models of IdentificationKnowledge Stage

Three common inputs

Problem looking for a solution

Solution looking for a problem

Isomorphism

Models of EvaluationPersuasion Stage

Persuasion

IF TO ADOPT WHICH TO ADOPT

Trial and Error

Specifications Match

Isomorphism – Part 2

Models of SelectionDecision Stage

Mandated Model

Request for Proposal

Isomorphism – Part 3

Considerations for Implementation

Implementation Stage

Project Management

Orientation

Training

Cultural

Lesson’s LearnedConfirmation Stage

References Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 20(4), 381-401.

Beath, C. M. (1991). Supporting the information technology champion. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 355-372.

Benamati, J., & Lederer, A. L. (2001). Rapid information technology change, coping mechanisms, and the emerging technologies group. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 183-202.

Cheney, P. H., Mann, R. I., & Amoroso, D. L. (1986). Organizational factors affecting the success of end-user computing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(1), 65-80.

Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Science, 49(3), 273-289.

Hartwick, J., & Barki, H. (1994). Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science, 40(4), 440.

Jasperson, J. (Sean), Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). a comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems1. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525-557.

Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.

Karuppan, Corinne M. & Karuppan, Muthu. (2008). Resilience of super users' mental models of enterprise-wide systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 29-46.

Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2005). The ability of information systems development project teams to respond to business and technology changes: A study of flexibility measures. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 75.

Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5), 251.

Moore, G. (2001). Crossing the Chasm (ePub. ed.), HarperCollins e-books.

Odhabi, H. (2007). Investigating the impact of laptops on students’ learning using bloom's learning taxonomy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1126-1131.

Palvia, S. C. (2000). Effectiveness of asynchronous and synchronous modes for learning computer software for end users: An experimental investigation. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(2), 99.

Rogers, Everett M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.), New York, NY: Free Press.

Tyre, M. J., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1993). Exploiting opportunities for technological improvement in organizations. Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 13.

Note: Logos and trademarks are owned by their respective organizations. All unlabeled images from Microsoft office collection of clipart or SmartArt, except image of author.

Questions and Comments

?