alice tof festival offline tools and grid scenario for the alice tof detector a. de caro (university...

Post on 27-Mar-2015

213 Views

Category:

Documents

1 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

ALICE TOF FESTIVAL

Offline tools and GRID scenario for the ALICE TOF detector

A. De Caro(University of Salerno and INFN)

CERN – Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

ALICE TOF Offline Group activitiesALICE software, AliROOT:the detector geometry (materials and geometrical

distributions);the real MRPC features (t and time-over-threshold);the cluster finder;the reconstruction algorithm (matching);the particle identification (PID);the alignment procedure;the calibration (time slewing corrections and cable delays);the optimization of the ‘online’ - ‘offline’ connections

(databases);event display.

A lot has been already done… …but still a lot remains to do.

Nevertheless we are in good shape.A. De Caro 2ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

OutlineTOF geometry: simulation detailsTOF MRPCs: simulation of the test beam

resultsTOF clustering: new algorithm implementationTOF particle identificationFirst cosmic through tracking detectors

matched with TOF detectorFirst alignment studiesSome of the ALICE TOF Offline Group

successes

A. De Caro 3ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Materials, shapes and their geometrical distributions in the ALICE reference frame

SM0

SM1

SM2

SM3SM4

SM5

SM6

SM7

SM8

SM9 SM17

A. De Caro 5ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

SM0

SM1

SM2SM3

SM4SM5

SM6

SM7

SM8

SM9

SM10

SM11

SM12SM13 SM14

SM15

SM16

SM17

TOF SMs as described in the AliROOT framework

A. De Caro 6ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

TOF SM: services detail

real simulation

A. De Caro 7ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Finger to cool NINO ASIC

real

simulation

TOF SM: front-end electronics detail

A. De Caro 8ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Description of the real MRPC features:detection efficiency

(time resolution and time-over-threshold)as a function of the hit pad position

Pads possibly

activated by

electrical induction

effects

Pad hit

by a particle

XZ

Y

A. De Caro 10ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 11

3 1 54 2 6

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 12

3 1 54 2 6

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 13

3 1 54 2 6

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 14

3 1 54 2 6

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 15

3 1 54 2 6

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 16

3 1 54 2 6

TOF MRPC strip: detection efficiency3 1 54 2 6

A. De Caro 17ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Standard clustering algorithm: one cluster per each fired pad.New clustering algorithm: one cluster per each set of

neighbouring fired pads with comparable time measurements(according to the time resolution).

Cluster time:currently, the time weighted average (per tot);

with calibration parameters, better estimation (NIM A532, 611-621, 2004).

Similar remarks for the cluster position.

con segnale

senza segnale

firednot fired

A. De Caro 19ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Comparison between the two clustering algorithms

In blue: standard TOF cluster

In red: new TOF cluster

In green: TOF pad interested by signal

TOF strips as tracking detectors

In yellow: standard TOF cluster fit

In violet: new TOF cluster fit

D. De Gruttola, Phd thesis, Salerno May 9th 2008

TOF strip in test

A. De Caro 20ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Detail on the pad interested by signal,

7th strip, the one in test.

The violet line crosses the strip in test

while the yellow one does not.

The chosen order parameter is the distance

between the impact point

of the reconstructed track to the hit pad centre.

This order parameter is minimum

in case of new TOF cluster fit.

In blue: standard TOF cluster

In red: new TOF cluster

In green: TOF pad interested by signal

In yellow: standard TOF cluster fit

In violet: new TOF cluster fit

Comparison between the two clustering algorithms

D. De Gruttola, Phd thesis, Salerno May 9th 2008A. De Caro 21ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

ALICE TOF detector performances:reconstructed mass vs momentum

and PID efficiency and contaminationin p-p and central Pb-Pb collisions

Mass vs momentum (PPR 2nd vol.)

A. De Caro 23ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

TOF PID efficiency and contamination (PPR 2nd vol.)

A. De Caro 24ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Some results obtained with the analysis of the data taken during the cosmic runs (12/07-

09/08)with/without L3 magnetic field.

Good chance to test the code with real data.

Cosmic muon reconstructed in ALICE detector (B=0 T)

t1

t2

t1<t2

Muon direction

TPC clustersTRD clustersTOF clustersReconstructed track

A. De Caro 26ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Prospective view

A. De Caro 27ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

t1

t2

t1<t2Muon direction

B = - |B| k -

Cosmic muon reconstructed in ALICE detector (B=0.5 T)

A. De Caro 28ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

A. De Caro 29

-

Prospective view

A. De Caro 29ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

To check the functionalities of the alignment algorithm with real events

Distance-approach (-z view)First alignment step for

the TOF detector: along the beam direction, i.e. the z axis.

Distance-approach: the distance between the impact point of the reconstructed track on the TOF strip and the closer TOF cluster centre (schematically shown here).

The z component of the distance-approach is the parameter used to align TOF SMs along z axis.

=371 cm

Reconstructed track

A. De Caro 31ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

A. De Caro 32ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

A. De Caro 33ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

A. De Caro 34ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

TPC: field cage internal wall

A. De Caro 35ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

TPC: field cage internal wall

Caused by

a not corrected calibration

for the drift velocity

(TPC people confirmed).

Several successes obtained by the TOF Offline Group. Some of them publicly acknowledged

by the ALICE Offline Group (green light for the TOF detector)

F.Carminati @ May 2007 Technical Boardhttp://indico.cern.ch/materialDisplay.py?contribId=14&materialId=slides&confId=7361

Wri

tten

cod

e / c

ode

to b

e w

ritt

en [

%]

TOF

Average

81.5%

A. De Caro 37ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Shuttle algorithm: online <-> offline

Responsible: C. Zampolli

http://aliceinfo.cern.ch/Offline/Activities/Shuttle.html

A. De Caro 38ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

Raw data implementation statushttp://aliceinfo.cern.ch/Offline/Activities/Raw-Data.html

TOF

A. De Caro 39ALICE TOF FESTIVALCERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008

CERN-Bdg.29, October 20th 2008 ALICE TOF FESTIVAL A. De Caro 40

top related