application of kaizen principles, methods, and tools to a ...€¦ · presentation this project was...

Post on 02-May-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

©2017 MFMER | slide-1

Application of Kaizen Principles, Methods, and Tools to a Large Cochlear Implant Program; A Continuous Quality Improvement Initiative

Douglas Sladen, Ph.D.

American Cochlear Implant Alliance July 2017

©2017 MFMER | slide-2

Disclosures

I have no proprietary interest in any of the products or devices mentioned in this

presentation

This project was funded through a grant provided by the MED-EL Lean Initiative

©2017 MFMER | slide-3

• Med EL Lean Initiative •  Improve access and remove barriers

• Why the Kaizen Lean Initiative? • Driven by the workers

©2017 MFMER | slide-4

Kaizen Workshops •  Week 1 - Current state

•  Observations (n=23) •  Create value stream map (VSM) •  Plan for future state, develop a charter

•  Week 2 - 5S •  Sort, set in order, shine, standardize, sustain

•  Week 3 - Standard Work I •  First target area (scheduling work flow)

•  Week 4 - Standard Work II •  Second target area (audiology work flow)

•  90-day follow up •  Re-sample the new current state (n=18)

©2017 MFMER | slide-5

Still building the Map: Value or not?

©2017 MFMER | slide-6

Value Stream Map

Sequence of activities describing a process including waits in between the process steps.

©2017 MFMER | slide-7

Current state – outcome measures

• Number of days from first contact through first appointment

• Number of days between surgery and activation of implant

• Number of minutes provider is out of the room to find ancillary equipment

• Number of hours to complete candidacy testing • Amount of inventory on site

©2017 MFMER | slide-8

3) Standard Work - Scheduling •  Defects/Motion/Overproduction

•  Delay in triaging implant candidates •  Coordinating patient with several providers •  Multiple lists to track patient movement

•  Solutions •  Create mechanisms for electronic triage •  Eliminate duplication of testing, combine patient

appointments, create service sets to “hold” appts for candidacy and activation

•  Consolidate lists and create a single folder for patients moving through candidacy

©2017 MFMER | slide-9

4) Standard Work - Audiology •  Defects/Motion/Overproduction

•  Patients have multiple different appointments to move through candidacy testing

•  Audiologists spend time doing activities that could be completed by an Audiology Assistant

•  Solutions •  Combine the first three appointments into one •  Assign the Audiology Assistants to complete some

activities (i.e., filling out order forms)

©2017 MFMER | slide-10

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Current State

90-day eval

Days from surgery to activation

Results – Wait time between surgery and activation

©2017 MFMER | slide-11

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

Current State

90-day eval

Candidacy test times

Results – Candidacy test times

©2017 MFMER | slide-12

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Current State

90-day eval

% of visits in which the clinician leaves the room

Results – searching for equipment

©2017 MFMER | slide-13

Results - Inventory

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Current State

90-day eval

©2017 MFMER | slide-14

Results – Wait time from 1st contact to 1st appointment

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Current State

90-day eval

Days from 1st Contact to Candidacy Testing

©2017 MFMER | slide-15

Patient Satisfaction Survey • Were your appointments scheduled within a

timeframe suited to your schedule? • Were you given all the necessary information

during your pre-operative appointments for you to make an informed decision

• 45 surveys were mailed to recently implanted patients in March 2017

• 30 surveys were returned (response rate 66.6%)

©2017 MFMER | slide-16

Patient satisfaction survey

0

1

2

3

4

5

Preferred Time Understood content Made informed decisions Strongly disagree

n=30 Strongly agree

©2017 MFMER | slide-17

"Quality is not an act. It is a habit." - Aristotle

©2017 MFMER | slide-18

Summary • Application of Kaizen principles to this CI

program improved overall efficiency • Ongoing review and fine tuning is required • Quality improvement projects can enhance your

practice, though take considerable time to complete

©2017 MFMER | slide-19

Contributors MED-EL Corporation Lean Initiative

Jordan Clawson

Mickey Matise

Rona Consulting Group

Erin Ressler

Ritsuko Travis

Mayo Clinic Cochlear Implant Program

Amy Olund, AuD

Matt Schmitt, BS

Barb Benson

Melissa DeJong, AuD

Alyce Breneman

Brittany Dowling, AuD

Lori Hubka

Sara Hollander

Matt Carlson, MD

©2017 MFMER | slide-20

Questions & Discussion

top related