arborist report - city of knox...arborist report westfield design knox city shopping centre, 425...
Post on 11-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Tel: 03 9877 4114 ABN: 39 531 880 706
Arborist Report
for
Westfield Design
Assessment of trees at Knox City Shopping Centrealong Burwood Highway and Stud Road, Wantirna South
Prepared by
Homewood Consulting Pty Ltd150 Junction Road
Nunawading V. 3131
Prepared For
Sony Lim Regional Asset Manager-Design Concepts85 Castlereagh St
Sydney NSW 2000
Consulting Arborist
Cameron Ryder Bachelor of Horticulture (Honours)
Advanced Diploma in Horticulture (Arboriculture)
Email: cameronryder@homewood.com.auMobile: 0400 160 889
3 April 2014
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Executive SummaryHomewood Consulting Pty Ltd has been engaged to provide a report on trees located along the Burwood Highway and Stud Road frontages of the Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South.
307 trees were assessed comprising 48 different species. The most popular species were Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum), Melaleuca styphelioides (Prickly-leaved Paperbark) and Eucalyptus sideroxylon (Red Ironbark) totalling 41, 27 and 27 specimens respectively. The trees were planted as a garden bed/informal screen and provide significant amenity to the wider landscape.
Figure 1: The trees have a significant impact on the visual amenity along Burwood Highway
The trees were individually assessed and put into 1 of 4 retention categories: 73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’70 trees were assessed ‘If possible, retain’133 trees were assessed ‘Not worth retaining’
31 trees were assessed ‘Third party ownership’
It is recommended that: 1. All trees are represented on future designs and feature surveys as well as respective
Tree Protection Zone dimensions applied to scale allowing the trees to be considered and incorporated into the proposal.
2. The design team maintains contact with the arborist to ensure that trees to be retained are provided with adequate space above and below ground.
3. Following development of a design, it is reviewed by the arborist to produce a construct impact statement detailing which trees are to be removed and/or retained as part of the proposal.
4. A tree management plan is produced following approval of the design to detail how trees to be retained will be protected during demolition and construction.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Contents1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4
2. Key Objectives .............................................................................................................. 4
3. Methodology.................................................................................................................. 4
4. Site Map ......................................................................................................................... 5
5. Field Assessment ......................................................................................................... 6 5.1 Site Details ............................................................................................................... 6 5.2 Tree Details .............................................................................................................. 7
5.2.1 Health, Structure & ULE .................................................................................. 7 5.2.2 Landscape Contribution and Individual Significance........................................ 9 5.2.3 Retention Value ............................................................................................ 11 5.2.4 Summary ...................................................................................................... 13
6. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 14 6.1 Tree Protection Zone Specifications ....................................................................... 14
6.1.1 Tree Protection Zone Guidelines: .................................................................. 14 6.2 TPZ Map ................................................................................................................ 16 6.3 TPZ dimension Summary ....................................................................................... 17 6.4 Proposed Entry from Stud Road ............................................................................. 19 6.5 Tree Pruning and Removal .................................................................................... 23 6.6 Tree Replacement .................................................................................................. 23 6.7 Design Considerations ........................................................................................... 23
6.7.1 Encroachment ............................................................................................... 23 6.7.2 Scaffolding .................................................................................................... 24 6.7.3 Porous and Permeable Materials .................................................................. 25 6.7.4 Mulch Application .......................................................................................... 27
7. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 28
8. Recommendation ........................................................................................................ 28
9. References .................................................................................................................. 29
Appendix 1. Data Collection Definitions .................................................................... 30
Appendix 2. TPZ Maps ................................................................................................ 34
Appendix 3. Tabular Tree Data ................................................................................... 39
Appendix 4. Photographic Tree Reports.................................................................... 53
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
1. IntroductionHomewood Consulting Pty Ltd has been engaged to provide a report on trees located along the Burwood Highway and Stud Road frontages of the Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South. It is understood that all or part of this area is proposed for redevelopment.
A base survey plan has been supplied identifying the areas for tree assessment. This was used to determine which trees to assess whilst out on site.
This report details the species, canopy size, Diameter at Breast Height (DBH), health, structure, Useful Life Expectancy (ULE), contribution to the landscape, retention value and recommendations for long term management of the trees.
2. Key Objectives Identify and record the dimensions of all trees within the area identified in section 4 Site
Map at the Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South. Provide an assessment of the tree specimens with regard to:
their health and structure their retention value in the landscape
Provide guidelines for tree retention in light of proposed development.
3. MethodologyAll trees were assessed on Saturday 15 and Saturday 22 March 2014.
Data collected for the trees included: Botanical Name Canopy Dimensions (HxW) Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Health Structure Useful Life Expectancy (ULE) Landscape Contribution Individual Significance Retention Value.
For full details of the information collected see Appendix 1.
Tree heights and canopy spread are shown on the survey prepared by Madigan Surveyors, March 2014. Tree locations are as surveyed, but tree numbers in this report do not correspond with the tree numbers on the survey prepared by Madigan Surveyors March 2014.
The area contains a large number of small shrubby species including Callistemon and small Melaleuca as well as juvenile seedling eucalypts. In general these were not assessed unless they exceeded approximately 4-5m in height.
All trees were located using differentially corrected GPS using Omnistar satellite correction. In general this provides an accuracy of approximately 50cm and has been used to overlay the trees on supplied plans.
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Stud Rd
Unn
amed
Gat
eshe
ad D
r
Tyner RdMelbourne St
Jack
son
Rd
Lynn
e Av
Alderford Dr
White Rd
Pinewood Dr
Hug
hes
St
Littl
e Bu
rwoo
d H
wy
Unnam
ed
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Unnamed
4. S
ite M
ap
Ass
essm
ent o
f tre
es a
long
Bur
woo
d H
ighw
ay a
nd S
tud
Roa
d, W
antir
na S
outh
Lege
ndTr
ees
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Scop
e of
Ass
essm
ent
cada
stre
Roa
ds
²0
5010
015
020
025
m
Hom
ewoo
d C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
150
Junc
tion
Roa
dN
unaw
adin
g V
IC 3
131
Ph: (
03) 9
877
4114
Base
Sho
ppin
g C
entre
Pla
n pr
ovid
ed b
y W
estfi
eld
Des
ign
Tree
s P
lotte
d by
Cam
eron
Ryd
erD
ate
Mar
ch 2
014
Proj
ectio
n: G
DA9
4 Zo
ne 5
5
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
5. Field Assessment
5.1 Site DetailsThe trees to be assessed were located between the existing car parks and road frontages including approximately 500m of Burwood Highway (Figure 2) and 220m of Stud Road (Figure 3). In general, both sections are heavily vegetated with a diverse mix of Australian grasses, shrubs and trees. Very few exotics exist within the area of assessment.
Figure 2: The entire frontage along Burwood Highway within the assessment area is heavily treed
Figure 3: Heavily treed section along Stud Road
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
5.2 Tree Details307 trees were assessed within the scope as detailed by Westfield Design comprising 48 different species. Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) was the most common with 41 specimens followed by Melaleuca styphelioides (Prickly-leaved Paperbark) and Eucalyptus sideroxylon (Red Ironbark) with 27 and 26 specimens respectively. The top 12 species composition is listed below in Table 1.
Table 1: Species composition
Botanical Name Common Name Status Number of IndividualsCorymbia maculata Spotted Gum Native 41Melaleuca styphelioides Prickly Paperbark Native 27Eucalyptus sideroxylon Red Ironbark Native 27Corymbia citriodora Lemon-scented Gum Native 19Eucalyptus leucoxylon Yellow Gum Native 17Casuarina cunninghamiana River She - Oak Native 17Eucalyptus viminalis Manna Gum Indigenous 16Eucalyptus mannifera Brittle Gum Native 12Melaleuca linariifolia Snow in Summer Native 12Eucalyptus nicholii Narrow-leaved Black Peppermint Native 11Melaleuca armillaris Giant Honey Myrtle Native 10Callistemon viminalis Weeping Bottle Brush Native 10
Others 88Total 307
The vast majority of the assessed specimens were Australian natives. 10 exotic specimens were assessed with all remaining trees being either indigenous (40 specimens) or Australian natives (257 specimens).
5.2.1 Health, Structure & ULE The health of the trees was generally good to fair with only 10% in the poor, very poor or dead categories (Figure 4). This is largely due to species composition and age. Many of the species are commonly planted urban trees in Melbourne used because either their natural growing conditions are similar to that in the region or they are a resilient, adaptable species.
Although the age of the trees varies, the maximum age of the trees within the shopping centre site is likely to be approximately 30-40 years. Within this timeframe, most eucalypts are still viable trees as they tend to be a long-lived genus in general. In contrast, the melaleucas and acacias were largely in decline and not suitable for long-term, retention.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Figure 4: Health
Approximately half of the trees assessed had fair structure (Figure 5), meaning the trees may have minor defects that are either unlikely to affect the tree’s ULE or could be pruned to remove. Of the 30% of specimens that had good structure, 80% of the trees were either Eucalyptus or Corymbia with long useful life expectancies.
Trees that have developed large defects, such as trunk decay, codominant stems, included bark or previous failures have resulted in poor tree structure. Subsequently, these trees are not considered suitable to remain in the site in light of possible future development. Many of the trees with poor structure require pruning to remain in their location or removal should be considered.
Figure 5: Structure
There is a wide spread of Useful Life Expectancies (ULE) for the trees across the site (Figure 6). This is not surprising given the variation in species and age. If all of the seedling eucalypts had been collected the 20-40 years and 40+ years categories would have been substantially higher. All trees with a ULE of less than 10 years have fair to poor structure and are a broad mix of species. Many of these have poor structure due to a lack of active management over the years.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Trees in the 10-20 years category are a mix of species in variable condition. They may be long-lived species in decline or average condition or short-lived species in good condition. Mostly they have been assigned a retention value of ‘If possible, retain’.
Trees with a ULE of greater than 20 years are almost completely from the Corymbia orEucalyptus genera and many of these have been assessed ‘Retain’.
Figure 6: ULE
5.2.2 Landscape Contribution and Individual Significance Given the variable sizes and locations of the trees, their contribution to the landscape has been corresponding variable (Figure 7). Small specimens nestled amongst a large thicket of trees were generally assigned a low to negligible contribution, whereas the large eucalypts that stood out as specimen trees were generally in the High landscape category. For example, Tree 234, Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) is a tall tree located near the entrance to the shopping centre on Stud Road (Figure 9). It can be seen from several vantage points and was assigned a high landscape contribution.
Figure 7: Landscape contribution
Approximately half of the trees were assigned an individual significance of low (Figure 8). This rating is about the quality of the tree specimen relative to its potential within the same
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
species. Given the trees were planted, few of the specimens have grown to a very large or impressive size for their respective species.
Approximately one third of the trees were in the moderate to valuable categories and subsequently almost all of these trees were assessed with a retention value of ‘Retain’. For Example, Tree 281 Eucalyptus camaldulensis (River Red Gum) is a tall indigenous species in good condition. It is suitably located with few faults or defects and was assessed as valuable (Figure 10).
Figure 8: Individual significance
Figure 9: Tree 234, Corymbia maculata, is a tall specimen near the shopping centre entrance
Figure 10: Tree 281, Eucalyptus camaldulensishas an individual significance of valuable
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
5.2.3 Retention Value Each tree has been provided with a retention value based on its species, condition, size, significance and landscape impact within its environment. Four retention values were considered: Retain If possible, retain Not worth retaining Third party ownership
Trees Assessed ‘Retain’
73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’ within the site. They are the most significant trees on-site and all efforts should be made to include them in final design plans. Trees assessed as ‘Retain’ are generally long-lived specimens in fair to good condition and are possible candidates for retention in a new landscape. The bulk of trees assessed in this category are from the genera Eucalyptus or Corymbia.
Tree 195, Eucalyptus mannifera (Brittle Gum) was assessed in this category (Figure 11). The tree is a mature specimen in good health with a ULE of 10-20 years. If retained in a new landscape it will provide immediate impact on its surroundings.
Trees Assessed ‘If possible, retain’70 trees have been assessed in this category.
If designing around or incorporating these trees into open space is not feasible or practical, removal and replacement would be an acceptable compromise.
The species, small size, age or landscape quality of the majority of these specimens means that replacement plants would quickly compensate the landscape and amenity value that is currently provided.
If these trees are to be retained, the proposed design will need to ensure that they have sufficient space for protection, growth and development. If this cannot be achieved, they should be removed.
Not Worth Retaining 133 trees were assessed, ‘Not worth retaining’. The assessment of ‘Not worth retaining’ indicates that these trees are either insignificant specimens or not conducive to being included in a development design. They generally will not be sustainable as a long-termfeature of any design proposal or could be very easily replaced. Trees in poor health or with significant defects in structure should not be candidates for preservation in areas where people or structures will be located (Matheny & Clark 1998).
Figure 12 is an example of one such tree. Tree 67 is a large Eucalyptus occidentalis(Swamp Yate) located on Burwood Highway. Whilst it is a large tree with a significant landscape contribution, previous major failure and subsequent decay, means that its
Figure 11: Tree 195 was assessed retain
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
structure is declining, is unlikely to improve and the tree should be removed. As a result the tree was assessed ‘Not worth retaining’.
Figure 12: Tree 67, Eucalyptus occidentalis was assessed ‘Not worth retaining’ due to decay and previous failure
Third Party Ownership Third party ownership infers that the trees are located off the subject site on a property owned by a third party. These trees have been assessed on the assumption that their owner requires their retention. It is neither a recommendation of good health, or suitability for retention. Discussions with the relevant parties and authorities may result in the removal of a tree assessed in this category.
31 trees were assessed as ‘Third party ownership’ primarily located on the western side of Stud Road (Figure 13)
Area of decay
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Figure 13: Trees assessed ‘Third party ownership’
5.2.4 Summary 307 trees were assessed for Westfield Design along Stud Road and Burwood Highway at Knox City Shopping Centre in Wantirna South. The trees were placed into the following retention categories based on their condition, size and ULE:
73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’70 trees were assessed ‘If possible, retain’133 trees were assessed ‘Not worth retaining’31 trees were assessed ‘Third party ownership’.
Regardless of retention value, any tree that is proposed for retention will require protection throughout any demolition and construction works as well as management and inspection after construction is completed. The best way of doing this is by setting up a Tree Protection Zone around each tree and development of a tree management plan to help guide works.
N
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
6. Discussion
6.1 Tree Protection Zone SpecificationsDamage to trees during development can be direct and indirect.
Direct damage includes mechanical injury to the trunk, the severing of roots, or alterations to the soil environment in the immediate vicinity of tree roots (i.e. compaction or loss of organic matter).
Indirect effects of site development are usually related to soil hydrology. This includes alterations to soil moisture content, changes in the level of the water table and drainage patterns (Coder 1995).
The most common method of protecting trees during construction is by setting up a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ).
TPZs have been calculated according to Protection of Trees on Development Sites (AS 4970-2009) for all trees to be retained (excluding palms) calculating the TPZ as 12 times the trunk diameter at 1.4m above ground level (DBH).
The TPZ fence is designed to act as a physical barrier of protective fencing that is a minimum of 1.8m high. It is erected around retained specimens (at the edge of the TPZ) before site works commence. See Figure 14.
Figure 14: TPZ fencing is erected around retained trees prior to site works.
6.1.1 Tree Protection Zone Guidelines: Careful adherence to the following exclusions and inclusions will maintain the health and longevity of retained tree specimens.
Exclude the following from taking place within any TPZ (adapted from AS 4970-2009): built structures or hard landscape features (i.e. paving, retaining walls) materials storage (i.e. equipment, fuel, building waste or rubble)
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
soil disturbance (i.e. stripping or grade changes) excavation works including soil cultivation(specifically surface-dug trenches for
underground utilities) placement of fill lighting of fires preparation of chemicals, including preparation of cement products pedestrian or vehicular access (i.e. pathways).
Include the following procedures in setting up and maintaining any TPZ (adapted from AS 4970-2009): erect warning signs at regular intervals along the entire length of any protective TPZ
fencing (Figure 15) construct TPZ fencing to prevent pedestrian access into the protected area. mulch the TPZ area to a depth of 150mm with woodchips (if available, use woodchips
generated from on site tree clearing). irrigate TPZs periodically, as determined by the consulting arborist.
TPZ guidelines need to adhere to all stages of the design and construction process and are relevant to all on-site utilities.
Figure 15: Example of a TPZ warning sign clearly displayed on TPZ fencing
TPZs for all trees have been applied to scale in the maps in Appendix 2 and are listed in the tabular reports in Appendix 3.
The following tables provide the TPZ dimensions for those trees assessed ‘Retain’, ‘If possible, retain’ and ‘Third party ownership’.
Much of the vegetation assessed occurred in groups or clumps across the sites.
In these instances, where trees are to be retained, the TPZs should be grouped together for simplicity and to provide extra protection to the retained trees both above and below ground.
Layo
ut 3
of 3
Layo
ut 2
of 3
Layo
ut 1
of 3
Stud Rd
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Unn
amed
Melbourne St
Tyner Rd
Gateshead Dr
Whi
te R
d
Lynne Av
Alderford Dr
Hen
ry R
d
Jack
son
Rd
Hug
hes
St
Pinewood Dr
Cot
tsw
old
Pl
Littl
e B
urw
ood
Hw
y
Hob
art P
l
Salis
bury
Ct
Cap
ital C
ity B
vd
Jamieson St
Snow
den
Pl
Birc
hfie
ld C
r
Brisbane Lane
Unna
med
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Unnam
edStud Rd
Unn
amed
6.2
TPZ
Map
Ass
essm
ent o
f tre
es a
long
Bur
woo
d H
ighw
ay a
nd S
tud
Roa
d, W
antir
na S
outh
Lege
ndTr
ees
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
TPZ
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
layo
uts
cada
stre
Roa
ds
²0
7014
021
028
035
m
Hom
ewoo
d C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
150
Junc
tion
Roa
dN
unaw
adin
g V
IC 3
131
Ph: (
03) 9
877
4114
Base
Sho
ppin
g C
entre
Pla
n pr
ovid
ed b
y W
estfi
eld
Des
ign
Tree
s P
lotte
d by
Cam
eron
Ryd
erD
ate
Mar
ch 2
014
Proj
ectio
n: G
DA9
4 Zo
ne 5
5
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
6.3 TPZ dimension SummaryTable 2: TPZ dimensions for tree assessed ‘Retain’
ID Botanical Name TPZ radius(m)
1 Corymbia maculata 4.22 Eucalyptus viminalis 64 Corymbia maculata 4.085 Corymbia maculata 3.126 Corymbia maculata 5.8811 Eucalyptus viminalis 3.3612 Eucalyptus viminalis 3.2413 Corymbia maculata 614 Corymbia citriodora 3.615 Corymbia citriodora 3.1216 Corymbia citriodora 3.8417 Corymbia citriodora 3.8421 Corymbia citriodora 3.623 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 7.6824 Corymbia citriodora 3
25 Corymbia citriodora 4.826 Corymbia citriodora 3.1228 Corymbia citriodora 4.6835 Eucalyptus cinerea 4.4436 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 5.439 Corymbia citriodora 4.240 Corymbia maculata 3.8441 Corymbia maculata 5.1643 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.2844 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.72
46 Casuarina cunninghamiana 5.5247 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 5.2863 Eucalyptus viminalis 7.4466 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 4.6868 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.5269 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 6.9686 Eucalyptus nicholii 8.1689 Corymbia maculata 4.0890 Corymbia maculata 4.5695 Corymbia maculata 6.36
104 Casuarina cunninghamiana 4.44106 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.48
ID Botanical Name TPZ radius(m)
113 Corymbia maculata 4.44124 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.6135 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 6.84138 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 7.68141 Eucalyptus scoparia 3.6142 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.84156 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.04162 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 4.44163 Eucalyptus viminalis 10.8165 Casuarina cunninghamiana 5.52166 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.24169 Corymbia maculata 3.96170 Corymbia maculata 3.72172 Corymbia maculata 4.32175 Corymbia maculata 4.2
176 Corymbia maculata 3.84181 Corymbia maculata 5.16192 Eucalyptus viminalis 6.24195 Eucalyptus mannifera 4.68197 Eucalyptus mannifera 3.24198 Corymbia maculata 5.64199 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 4.56202 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.88220 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 4.56221 Eucalyptus mannifera 7.08
224 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.88225 Corymbia maculata 5.76226 Corymbia maculata 7.44233 Corymbia maculata 4.56234 Corymbia maculata 6.24236 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.84237 Melaleuca styphelioides 4.68247 Corymbia maculata 7.44256 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 4.8258 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 6.48
271 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.16
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Table 3: TPZ dimensions for tree assessed ‘If possible, retain’
ID Botanical Name TPZ radius (m)
3 Corymbia maculata 27 Corymbia citriodora 29 Corymbia maculata 2.2831 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 3.7237 Acacia melanoxylon 2
48 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 257 Callistemon viminalis 2.1658 Callistemon viminalis 3.1259 Callistemon viminalis 261 Corymbia maculata 2.6462 Eucalyptus occidentalis 2.0470 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 5.7672 Casuarina cunninghamiana 3.3678 Eucalyptus nicholii 3.9681 Melaleuca styphelioides 2.28
82 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.2885 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.8887 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.9692 Corymbia maculata 2.0498 Corymbia citriodora 299 Corymbia citriodora 2.88100 Corymbia citriodora 2.76101 Eucalyptus occidentalis 2.04105 Casuarina cunninghamiana 2114 Corymbia maculata 2115 Corymbia maculata 2116 Corymbia maculata 2117 Corymbia maculata 2118 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2119 Eucalyptus occidentalis 2120 Corymbia maculata 2121 Corymbia maculata 2122 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2123 Corymbia maculata 2127 Corymbia maculata 2134 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2
ID Botanical Name TPZ radius (m)
136 Melaleuca styphelioides 2.76137 Eucalyptus cladocalyx 6.48139 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 2158 Eucalyptus nicholii 3.84159 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.04
161 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.4167 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 2.28168 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 3.48177 Eucalyptus viridis 3185 Acacia melanoxylon 2187 Allocasuarina littoralis 2188 Allocasuarina littoralis 3.6191 Allocasuarina littoralis 2.28193 Casuarina cunninghamiana 4.56209 Lagunaria patersonia 3.96
210 Lagunaria patersonia 3.96216 Lagunaria patersonia 2.76219 Corymbia maculata 2222 Melaleuca styphelioides 2.64227 Melaleuca styphelioides 2229 Corymbia maculata 2239 Robinia pseudoacacia 2240 Robinia pseudoacacia 2.28241 Robinia pseudoacacia 2.04242 Corymbia citriodora 3.24261 Eucalyptus cosmophylla 2.16263 Eucalyptus saligna 3.36264 Eucalyptus sp. 2265 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.72266 Melaleuca styphelioides 3.84267 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 4.8272 Corymbia maculata 2274 Eucalyptus polyanthemos 4.2276 Corymbia citriodora 3.96
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Table 4: TPZ dimensions for tree assessed ‘Third party ownership’
ID Botanical Name TPZradius (m)
277 Populus canescens 3.6278 Eucalyptus saligna 4.32279 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.52280 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.64281 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 9.96282 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.04283 Melaleuca armillaris 3.6284 Eucalyptus mannifera 3.24285 Eucalyptus nicholii 2286 Eucalyptus nicholii 2.04287 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 7.68288 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 3.84289 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.64290 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.16291 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.04292 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2
ID Botanical Name TPZradius (m)
293 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 8.16294 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2295 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2296 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 3.12297 Eucalyptus leucoxylon 5.76298 Eucalyptus nicholii 5.64299 Eucalyptus mannifera 3.24300 Eucalyptus sideroxylon 5.04301 Cupressus macrocarpa 'Aurea' 11.4302 Eucalyptus camaldulensis 2303 Melaleuca armillaris 6.24304 Eucalyptus botryoides 5.88305 Grevillea robusta 7.2306 Casuarina cunninghamiana 5.04307 Eucalyptus mannifera 2.16
6.4 Proposed Entry from Stud RoadThere is a proposal for a new entrance to the shopping centre off Stud road at the northern section of the site (Figure 16). This has the potential to impact 35 of the 307 assessed trees. They include: Trees 202-3, 206, 255-60 & 262-74 located within the subject site Trees 279-80, 282-91 & 307 located on the western side of Stud Road.
Table 5Table 6 provides a summary of the impact associated with the proposed road realignment and entrance from stud road. The impact has been individually detailed in Table 6 for each tree.
Table 5: Summary of construction impact
Impact Retain If possible, retain
Not worth retaining
Third party ownership
Total
High 4 7 10 2 23Low 0 0 1 11 12
Tree protection fencing will need to be erected behind the back of kerb for the new entrance and alignment off stud road to protect all trees to be retained. This should be completed in accordance with AS 4970-2009 and section 6.1 Tree Protection Zone Specifications.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Figure 16: Proposed new entrance from Stud Road
Existing entrance
Proposed entrance
Existing exit
Arbo
rist R
epor
t W
estfie
ld De
sign
Knox
City
Sho
pping
Cen
tre, 4
25 B
urwo
od H
ighwa
y, W
antirn
a So
uth
Refer
ence
: 259
8
Tabl
e 6:
Indi
vidu
al im
pact
ass
essm
ent
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eD
BH
(cm
)TP
ZIm
pact
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
Com
men
t20
2E
ucal
yptu
s le
ucox
ylon
242.
88H
igh
Ret
ain
28%
incu
rsio
n in
to T
PZ, t
ree
will
requ
ire re
mov
al20
3M
elal
euca
arm
illaris
364.
32H
igh
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
ass
esse
d no
t wor
th re
tain
ing
206
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
is20
2.4
Low
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
ass
esse
d no
t wor
th re
tain
ing
255
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
495.
88H
igh
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al25
6E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
n40
4.8
Hig
hR
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
257
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
232.
76H
igh
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al25
8E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
n54
6.48
Hig
hR
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
259
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
202.
4H
igh
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al26
0E
ucal
yptu
s le
hman
nii
222.
64H
igh
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al26
2M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
es30
3.6
Hig
hN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
gTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
263
Euc
alyp
tus
salig
na28
3.36
Hig
hIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al26
4E
ucal
yptu
s sp
.15
2H
igh
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
265
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
313.
72H
igh
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
266
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
323.
84H
igh
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
267
Euc
alyp
tus
poly
anth
emos
404.
8H
igh
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
268
Euc
alyp
tus
cosm
ophy
lla30
3.6
Hig
hN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
gTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
269
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
333.
96H
igh
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al27
0M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
es22
2.64
Hig
hN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
gTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
271
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
435.
16H
igh
Ret
ain
Tree
exi
sts
with
in p
ropo
sed
road
des
ign
and
will
requ
ire re
mov
al27
2C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
a5
2H
igh
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
nTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
273
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lis45
5.4
Hig
hN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
gTr
ee e
xist
s w
ithin
pro
pose
d ro
ad d
esig
n an
d w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
Arbo
rist R
epor
t W
estfie
ld De
sign
Knox
City
Sho
pping
Cen
tre, 4
25 B
urwo
od H
ighwa
y, W
antirn
a So
uth
Refer
ence
: 259
8
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eD
BH
(cm
)TP
ZIm
pact
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
Com
men
t27
4E
ucal
yptu
s po
lyan
them
os35
4.2
Hig
hIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
29%
incu
rsio
n in
to T
PZ, t
ree
will
requ
ire re
mov
al27
9E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
n46
5.52
Low
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
pTr
ee c
an b
e re
tain
ed, a
ppro
xim
atel
y 2%
incu
rsio
n28
0E
ucal
yptu
s m
anni
fera
222.
64Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
No
incu
rsio
n bu
t tre
e pr
otec
tion
requ
ired
282
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
ra17
2.04
Low
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
pN
o in
curs
ion
but t
ree
prot
ectio
n re
quire
d28
3M
elal
euca
arm
illaris
303.
6Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
No
incu
rsio
n bu
t tre
e pr
otec
tion
requ
ired
284
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
ra27
3.24
Low
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
pN
o in
curs
ion
but t
ree
prot
ectio
n re
quire
d28
5E
ucal
yptu
s ni
chol
ii13
2Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
No
incu
rsio
n bu
t tre
e pr
otec
tion
requ
ired
286
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
172.
04Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
No
incu
rsio
n bu
t tre
e pr
otec
tion
requ
ired
287
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
647.
68H
igh
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p20
% in
curs
ion
into
TPZ
, tre
e w
ill re
quire
rem
oval
288
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
323.
84Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
Tree
can
be
reta
ined
, app
roxi
mat
ely
3% in
curs
ion
289
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
475.
64H
igh
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p16
% in
curs
ion
into
TPZ
, tre
e sh
ould
be
rem
oved
as
it is
lean
ing
out i
nto
the
road
290
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
435.
16Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
Tree
can
be
reta
ined
, app
roxi
mat
ely
5% in
curs
ion
291
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
425.
04Lo
wTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
Tree
can
be
reta
ined
, app
roxi
mat
ely
4% in
curs
ion
307
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
ra18
2.16
Low
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
pN
o in
curs
ion
but t
ree
prot
ectio
n re
quire
d
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
6.5 Tree Pruning and RemovalPruning and removal works should be carried out or be directly supervised by qualified arborists. At least one fully qualified arborist must be present on-site at all times during pruning operations. The minimum qualification should be: An Advanced Certificate of Arboriculture. A National Certificate in Horticulture (Arboriculture) AQF Level 4.
All pruning undertaken must conform to the Australian Standard Pruning of Amenity Trees (AS-4373 2007).
Where trees are to be removed on a large scale and in whole groups, it may be appropriate to use excavators or other large equipment. This kind of equipment should not be used within 35m of any trees to be retained.
6.6 Tree ReplacementAny proposed design for the site will need to ensure that sufficient space is allocated for establishment of replacement trees and plants. These can be incorporated into gardens, road reserves and public open space and will help to compensate the loss in landscape contribution from the removed trees.
The surrounding landscape has areas of indigenous vegetation. This theme should be continued when considering replacement trees, shrubs and grass species for the property.
A replacement ratio of 10: 1 should be applied to the removal of any trees. That is, for every tree that is removed, 10 plants should be replaced. Replacement plants should comprise a mixture of trees, shrubs, herbs, and grasses with a minimum of 10-15% of the replacement plants being trees. Sufficient space should be allowed in the proposed plan to cater for the trees future growth requirements.
6.7 Design Considerations
6.7.1 Encroachment In some cases, where trees are to be retained encroachment into the TPZ may be necessary. Working within the Australian Standard framework there is provision for this and it is grouped into 2 broad categories.
Minor encroachment AS 4970-2009 Encroachment of less than 10% of the TPZ and outside the SRZ is deemed to be minor encroachment according to AS 4970-2009. Detailed root investigations should not be required but must be compensated with an extension to the TPZ elsewhere. See Figure 17. Variations must be made by the project arborist considering other relevant factors including tree health, vigour, stability, species sensitivity and soil characteristics.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Figure 17: Example of TPZ encroachment and compensatory offset (image from AS 4970-2009)
Major encroachment AS 4970-2009 Encroachment of more than 10% of the TPZ or into the SRZ is deemed to be major encroachment according to AS 4970-2009. The project arborist must demonstrate that the tree(s) would remain viable. The area lost to this encroachment should be compensated for elsewhere and contiguous with the TPZ. This may require root investigation by non-destructive methods and consideration of relevant factors tree health, vigour, stability, species sensitivity and soil characteristics.
6.7.2 Scaffolding If scaffolding is required for construction, it would be possible to erect scaffolding inside the TPZ providing the following procedures were adhered to. 1. The scaffolding should be erected inside the TPZ under the direct supervision of the
consulting arborist. 2. The ground level of the construction site underneath the scaffolding should consist of the
‘raised walkway’. This will prevent compaction of the soil surface and again, all pedestrian traffic should be excluded from the ground level unless utilising the raised walkway.
3. The Tree Protection Zone will require inspection prior to the commencement of works and inspected regularly throughout the construction on site.
4. Where possible all construction works should be completed from within the building envelope.
5. The consulting arborist should oversee any activities that would require additional access into the Tree Protection Zone.
Figure 18 provides an example of scaffolding set-up
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Figure 18: Scaffolding set-up (AS 4970-2009)
6.7.3 Porous and Permeable Materials Any hard surfacing within the TPZs should be minimised and/or designed to be porous. This allows for water exchange between the soil and a continuous exchange of air with the atmosphere, thereby maintaining a high soil oxygen level (Ferguson 2005).
Figure 19 provides an example of porous paving using Eco-Trihex pavers, which may be applicable for paved areas.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Figure 19: Example of Eco-Trihex paving
Where paths or pedestrian access is proposed near trees, a boardwalk may be appropriate. Creating a boardwalk underneath the canopies of trees reduces the impact on the trees as only post holes need to be dug (rather than large scale earth scraping and cutting to create a level path) minimizing soil disturbance. Soil compaction from human and vehicular traffic is also eliminated. Figure 20Error! Not a valid bookmark self-reference. provides a diagrammatic view of how a boardwalk could appear.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
It is important that the boardwalk sits just above the soil level, however it need only be a few centimetres above ground level to avoid compaction of the soil.
Figure 20: A) Example boardwalk design, B) Aerial view of boardwalk design
6.7.4 Mulch Application As part of the demolition and construction, all trees to be retained should be mulched ahead of time. It is likely that mulch will be generated from on-site pruning and removal works and should be used across the site.
Mulch has many benefits to plants including: Soil moisture conservation Soil compaction reduction Grass and weed suppression Reduction in soil erosion Soil structure improvements An increase in soil fertility Moderation of soil temperature on a diurnal and seasonal basis (Harris, Clark & Matheny
1999).
The application of mulch provides a ‘blanket’ effect on the soil. It helps retain moisture in the soil, provide organic matter and is beneficial to maintaining the soil microflora. In time it helps improve soil structure and promote the existence of worms and other soil organisms, beneficial for healthy soil. In the long-term it will create a soil environment beneficial for healthy root growth. It is envisaged that the mulched areas would act as exclusion zones and reduce the potential for compaction.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
7. Conclusions307 trees were assessed along the Burwood Highway and Stud Road frontages of the Knox City Shopping Centre in Wantirna South. Although there are no designs for works at this stage, it is understood that the site is of interest for future development. All trees were located using differentially corrected GPS, the trunks measured using a diameter tape and tree condition assessed.
In general the trees are in good health with fair structure. The reduced structure ratings are as a result of the lack of proactive maintenance of the trees over the years. Many trees have suffered previous failures and/or are decayed.
Following the assessments the trees were placed into 4 retention categories. 73 trees were assessed ‘Retain’These are the trees in the best condition, with the highest landscape impact and have a long ULE 70 trees were assessed ‘If possible, retain’These are trees in good condition but tend to be small and the landscape amenity can be easily compensated 133 trees were assessed ‘Not worth retaining’Juveniles or trees that are in decline or have a limited ULE. These trees should not be considered a constraint to development 31 trees were assessed ‘Third party ownership’As these trees are owned by a third party all efforts should be made to retain and protect throughout any redevelopment.
In light of a future design, tree protection measures have been supplied and dimensions accurately applied to all maps within the report. Considerations and design options to maintain the trees during development have been provided including: Tree pruning and removal Tree replacement Encroaching in TPZs Scaffolding Permeable/Low impact paving design Mulch application
If the above points are considered during the development of a design proposal, it is likely that many trees can be retained within the design.
8. RecommendationSee summary
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
9. ReferencesAS 4373, 2007, Australian Standard, Pruning Amenity Trees, 2nd Edition Standards Australia
AS 4970, 2009, Australian Standard, Protection of Trees on Development Sites, Standards Australia
Coder, K. D., 1995, ‘Tree quality BMPs for developing wooded areas and protecting residual trees’, in Trees and Building Sites, Proceedings of an International Workshop on Trees and Buildings, Edited by G. W. Watson and D. Neely, International Society of Arboriculture, Champaign, Illinois.
Ferguson, B. K., 2005, Porous Pavements, CRC Press, Florida
Harris, R.W., Clark, J.R. & Matheny, N.P., 1999, Arboriculture; Integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs, and vines, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Matheny, N. & Clark, R. C. 1994, Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas, 2nd edn., International Society of Arboriculture, USA.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Appendix 1. Data Collection Definitions
The information collected on each specimen was based on the assessor’s experience and opinion of each of the trees. Included are the descriptions for each of the listed categories. The following information was collected on each tree.
1.1 Botanical name: The genus, species and common name.
1.2 Canopy dimensions Height (approximate) and width (measured) of the canopy in metres.
1.3 DBHDiameter at breast height (measured at 1.3m above ground level).
1.4 Health
Table 7. Health Definition
Term Definition
Excellent The tree is demonstrating excellent or exceptional growth. The tree should exhibit a full canopy of foliage and be free of pest and disease problems.
Good The tree is demonstrating good or exceptional growth. The tree should exhibit a full canopy of foliage, and have only minor pest or diseases problems.
Fair The tree is in reasonable condition and growing well. The tree should exhibit an adequate canopy of foliage. There may be some deadwood present in the crown. Some grazing by insects or possums may be evident.
Poor The tree is not growing to its full capacity; extension growth of the laterals is minimal. The canopy may be thinning or sparse. Large amounts of deadwood may be evident throughout the crown. Significant pest and disease problems may be evident or symptoms of stress indicating tree decline.
Very Poor The tree appears to be in a state of decline. The tree is not growing to its full capacity. The canopy may be very thin and sparse. A significant volume of deadwood may be present in the canopy or pest and disease problems may be causing a severe decline in tree health.
Dead The tree is dead.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
1.5 Structure
Table 8. Structure Definition
Term Definition
Good The tree has a well defined and balanced crown. Branch unions appear to be strong, with no defects evident in the trunk or the branches. Major limbs are well defined. The tree is considered a good example of the species.
Fair The tree has some minor problems in the structure of the crown. The crown may be slightly out of balance, and some branch unions may be exhibiting minor structural faults. If the tree has a single trunk, it may be on a slight lean or exhibiting minor defects.
Poor The tree may have a poorly structured crown. The crown may be unbalanced or exhibit large gaps. Major limbs may not be well defined. Branches may be rubbing or crossing over. Branch unions may be poor or faulty at the point of attachment. The tree may have suffered root damage.
Very Poor The tree has a poorly structured crown. The crown is unbalanced or exhibit large gaps with possibly large sections of deadwood. Major limbs may not be well defined. Branches may be rubbing or crossing over. Branch unions may be poor or faulty at the point of attachment. Branches may exhibit large cracks that are likely to fail in the future. The tree may have suffered major root damage.
Failed The tree has a very poorly structured crown. A section of the tree has failed or is in imminent danger of failure.
1.6 Useful Life Expectancy (ULE) Rating Useful Life Expectancy is approximately how long a tree can be retained safely and usefully in the landscape.
Table 9. ULE Definition
Term Definition
Unsafe The tree is considered dangerous in the location and has no significant amenity value.
Less than 5 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and have value for up to five years, but will need to be replaced. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required. If possible, replacement trees should be planted.
5 – 10 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for up to ten years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.
11 – 20 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for up to twenty years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.
20 – 40 years The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for up to forty years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.
Greater than 40 years
The tree, under normal circumstances and without extra stresses being imposed on it, should be safe and of value for greater than forty years. During this period, normal inspections and maintenance will be required.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
1.7 Tree Origin
Table 10. Tree Origin Definition
Term Definition
Exotic The species originates in a country other than Australia.Native The species originates within Australia.Indigenous The species originates within the local environs.
1.8 Contribution to the Landscape Rating
Table 11. Contribution to the Landscape Rating Definition
Term Definition
High The tree may be significant in the landscape, offer shade and other amenities such as screening. The tree may assist with erosion control, offer a windbreak or perform a vital function in the location (Eg: Habitat, shade, flowers or fruit).
Medium The tree may offer some screening in the landscape or serve a particular function in the location.
Low The tree offers very little in the way of screening or amenity.
1.9 Tree Significance Rating This rating system is used to rate the significance of trees in a local area. Some trees identified in local areas may be suitable for National or State registration. Trees that have State or National significance would normally be registered by The National Trust and identified as such. This system of rating and any values expressed represents the opinion of the consultant.
Trees may be considered significant in a local area if they fit into one or more of the following categories.
Exceptional size Rare Very old Unusual shape or form Aboriginal cultural value Historic value
Exceptional example of a species Economic, genetic Outstanding feature in the landscape Habitat value Erosion control
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Table 12. Tree Significance Rating Definition
Term Definition
Exceptional A tree is considered exceptional because several of the preceding categories apply to the specimen. This tree is normally one that creates a profound effect on the local area and has an exceptional impact on the tree surveyor
Outstanding A tree is considered outstanding because one or several of the preceding categories apply to the specimen. This tree is normally one that attracts attention and has a noticeable impact on the area and the tree surveyor.
Valuable A tree is considered valuable because at least one of the preceding categories may be applicable or partially to the specimen. This tree is normally one that is a reasonable specimen without any particular outstanding features. It normally has a diameter at breast height over 1000mm and has good to average health and structure.
Moderate A tree is considered to have moderate value because it may be in reasonable condition but may only partially fulfil any one factor. It generally has a diameter at breast height of less than 1000mm and an average or poor health and structure.
Low value As an individual specimen, the tree is not considered significant. This may be a small specimen, with poor health or structure and be common in occurrence or possibly a weed species. This tree has no impact on the tree surveyor.
Negligible As an individual specimen, the tree is not considered significant. This may be a very small specimen with very poor health and structure and may be common in occurrence or a weed species. This tree has no impact on the tree surveyor.
1.10 Retention Value of the Tree
Table 13. Retention Value of the Tree Definition
Term Definition
Retain The tree is well suited to the site and offers amenity or screening to the site. The tree is normally in fair to good health and has fair to good structure. Its ULE should be at least the same as the design life of any new buildings. In some circumstances a tree may need to be retained for cultural/historic reasons, because it is indigenous, old, remnant or because the tree (regardless of species) may offer vital screening for surrounding properties.
If possible, retain The tree is suited to the site and, if practical, designs should be altered to accommodate the tree. This category may contain trees that are juvenile or semi-mature specimens that can potentially be replaced with standard nursery stock. It may be possible to transplant trees rated in this category.
Not worth retaining The tree is not worth retaining in the landscape. The tree may be considered a weed species, structurally unsound, dead/dying/diseased, nearing the end of its ULE or may not be suitable for the site.
Third party ownership
The tree is located outside of the subject site. It may be owned by a private entity (residential) or public body (council). For all purposes, a third party is assumed to have ownership of the tree. The tree has been assessed on the assumption that its owner requires retention of the tree. It is neither a recommendation of good health of the tree, or suitability for retention. Discussions with the relevant parties and authorities may result in the removal of a tree assessed in this category.
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Appendix 2. TPZ Maps
Layo
ut 3
of 3
Layo
ut 2
of 3
Layo
ut 1
of 3
Stud Rd
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Unn
amed
Melbourne St
Tyner Rd
Gateshead Dr
Whi
te R
d
Lynne Av
Alderford Dr
Hen
ry R
d
Jack
son
Rd
Hug
hes
St
Pinewood Dr
Cot
tsw
old
Pl
Littl
e B
urw
ood
Hw
y
Hob
art P
l
Salis
bury
Ct
Cap
ital C
ity B
vd
Jamieson St
Snow
den
Pl
Birc
hfie
ld C
r
Brisbane Lane
Unna
med
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Unnam
edStud Rd
Unn
amed
TPZ
Map
Ove
rvie
w
Ass
essm
ent o
f tre
es a
long
Bur
woo
d H
ighw
ay a
nd S
tud
Roa
d, W
antir
na S
outh
Lege
ndTr
ees
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
TPZ
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
layo
uts
cada
stre
Roa
ds
²0
7014
021
028
035
m
Hom
ewoo
d C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
150
Junc
tion
Roa
dN
unaw
adin
g V
IC 3
131
Ph: (
03) 9
877
4114
Base
Sho
ppin
g C
entre
Pla
n pr
ovid
ed b
y W
estfi
eld
Des
ign
Tree
s P
lotte
d by
Cam
eron
Ryd
erD
ate
Mar
ch 2
014
Proj
ectio
n: G
DA9
4 Zo
ne 5
5
9
8
6
5 4 32 1
7877 76
7372
7170
69 6867
6665 64
636261
60
5855 54
5250
4947
46
45 4443
41
403938
37
3635
34 33
3231
3029
28
2726
2524
23
22
212019
1817
1615
14
1211
10
7
7574
5957 56
5351
48
42
13
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Lynne Av
Melbourne St
Unn
amed
Hen
ry R
d
Littl
e Bu
rwoo
d H
wy
Hug
hes
St
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Layo
ut 1
of 3
Ass
essm
ent o
f tre
es a
long
Bur
woo
d H
ighw
ay a
nd S
tud
Roa
d, W
antir
na S
outh
Lege
ndTr
ees
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
TPZ
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
cada
stre
Roa
ds
²0
2550
7510
012
.5m
Hom
ewoo
d C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
150
Junc
tion
Roa
dN
unaw
adin
g V
IC 3
131
Ph: (
03) 9
877
4114
Base
Sho
ppin
g C
entre
Pla
n pr
ovid
ed b
y W
estfi
eld
Des
ign
Tree
s P
lotte
d by
Cam
eron
Ryd
erD
ate
Mar
ch 2
014
Proj
ectio
n: G
DA9
4 Zo
ne 5
5
9998
97 9695
9493 92 91
9089
88
87
8684
8281
8079
206
202
201
200
199 19
819
7
195
194
193
192 19
1 188 18
718
418
3
182
180
179
177
176
175
174 17
317
2 171
170
168
167
16616
516
416
3
162
160
159
158
157
155
15415
215
1
150
149
147
146
145 14
4
143
142 14
1 140
139
137
136
135
133
131
130 12
5 123 12
211
9
118
116
115 11
311
210
6 105 10
3
101
85
83
207 19
6
190
189
186
185 18
1
178
169
161
156
153
148
138
134
132
129
128
127
126 12
4 121
120
117 11
411
1
110
109 10
8 107
104 10
210
0
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Tyner Rd
Stud Rd
Burw
ood
Hw
y
Layo
ut 2
of 3
Ass
essm
ent o
f tre
es a
long
Bur
woo
d H
ighw
ay a
nd S
tud
Roa
d, W
antir
na S
outh
Lege
ndTr
ees
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
TPZ
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
cada
stre
Roa
ds
²0
2550
7510
012
.5m
Hom
ewoo
d C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
150
Junc
tion
Roa
dN
unaw
adin
g V
IC 3
131
Ph: (
03) 9
877
4114
Base
Sho
ppin
g C
entre
Pla
n pr
ovid
ed b
y W
estfi
eld
Des
ign
Tree
s P
lotte
d by
Cam
eron
Ryd
erD
ate
Mar
ch 2
014
Proj
ectio
n: G
DA9
4 Zo
ne 5
5
307
306
305
304
303
302
301
300
299
298
297
296
295
294
29329
2
291
290
288
28628
4282
281
280
279
278 27
727
6
275
274
273
271
270
269
268
267
266
265 26
426
326
2
261
260
258 25
625
4
253
252
251
250
247
246
245
244 24
1 240 23
9
238
237
236
235
234 23
323
223
123
0
229
227 22
6 225
224
223
222
221
220
219
218
217
216
215
214
213
212
211
210
209
208
206
205
204
202
201
199
289
287
28528
3
272
259
257
255
249
248
243
242
228
207
203
Stud Rd
Unnam
ed
Alderford Dr
Pinewood Dr
Salis
bury
Ct
Unn
amed
Layo
ut 3
of 3
Ass
essm
ent o
f tre
es a
long
Bur
woo
d H
ighw
ay a
nd S
tud
Roa
d, W
antir
na S
outh
Lege
ndTr
ees
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
TPZ
Ret
ain
Third
par
ty
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
cada
stre
Roa
ds
²0
2550
7510
012
.5m
Hom
ewoo
d C
onsu
lting
Pty
Ltd
150
Junc
tion
Roa
dN
unaw
adin
g V
IC 3
131
Ph: (
03) 9
877
4114
Base
Sho
ppin
g C
entre
Pla
n pr
ovid
ed b
y W
estfi
eld
Des
ign
Tree
s P
lotte
d by
Cam
eron
Ryd
erD
ate
Mar
ch 2
014
Proj
ectio
n: G
DA9
4 Zo
ne 5
5
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Appendix 3. Tabular Tree Data
Tabu
lar R
epor
tPr
econ
stru
ctio
n As
sess
men
tKn
ox C
ity S
hopp
ing C
entre
, 425
Bur
wood
High
way,
Wan
tirna
Sout
h
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
1C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um14
m x
6m
35V
ery
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sR
etai
n4.
2
2E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um15
m x
8m
50V
ery
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
6
3C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um6m
x 2
m10
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
4C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um15
m x
6m
34V
ery
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sTr
ee is
gro
win
g w
ith a
rest
ricte
d ro
ot v
olum
eR
etai
n4.
08
5C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um12
m x
5m
26G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
Tree
is g
row
ing
with
a re
stric
ted
root
vol
ume
Ret
ain
3.12
6C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um15
m x
8m
49G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
Tree
is g
row
ing
with
a re
stric
ted
root
vol
ume
Ret
ain
5.88
7C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
7m x
5m
15G
ood
Poo
r40
+ ye
ars
Pru
ne c
odom
inan
tIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
8C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
11m
x 6
m30
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
res
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.6
9C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um8m
x 3
m19
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.28
10E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um16
m x
6m
35D
ead
Poo
r0
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g4.
2
11E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um13
m x
4m
28D
ead
Poo
r0
year
sR
etai
n3.
36
12E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um11
m x
4m
27D
ead
Poo
r0
year
sR
etai
n3.
24
13C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um16
m x
8m
50G
ood
Fair
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
6
14C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
15m
x 6
m30
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.6
15C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
13m
x 6
m26
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.12
16C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
15m
x 7
m32
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.84
17C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
13m
x 8
m32
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.84
18M
elal
euca
lina
riifo
liaS
now
in S
umm
er5m
x 4
m15
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
19E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um11
m x
6m
28Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Tree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.36
20E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um10
m x
8m
35P
oor
Poo
r0
year
sTr
ee is
in d
eclin
e, D
ecay
and
br
acke
t fun
giN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g4.
2
21C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
10m
x 1
0m30
Goo
dFa
ir20
-40
year
sTr
ee in
con
flict
with
pow
erlin
eR
etai
n3.
6
22E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um15
m x
16m
76G
ood
Poo
r10
-20
year
sTr
unk
deca
yN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g9.
12
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
23E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk14
m x
10m
64G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
7.68
24C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
13m
x 6
m25
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sR
etai
n3
25C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
12m
x 1
0m40
Goo
dFa
ir20
-40
year
sR
etai
n4.
8
26C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
13m
x 5
m26
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.12
27C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
13m
x 7
m30
Fair
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Maj
or c
odom
inan
t inc
lusi
onN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
6
28C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
14m
x 8
m39
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.68
29C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
5m x
2m
12D
ead
Poo
r0
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
30P
runu
s pe
rsic
aP
each
/Nec
tarin
e5m
x 5
m10
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
31E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk8m
x 8
m31
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.72
32E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk17
m x
12m
79G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Tree
is tr
ifurc
ated
with
incl
uded
ba
rk, b
eyon
d co
rrect
iona
l pru
ning
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
9.48
33E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk12
m x
10m
51G
ood
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Evi
denc
e of
pre
viou
s br
anch
fa
ilure
and
sub
sequ
ent
epic
orm
ic g
row
th. A
lso
conf
lictin
g po
wer
lines
.
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6.12
34E
ucal
yptu
s m
anni
fera
Brit
tle G
um12
m x
4m
33D
ead
Poo
r0
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
96
35E
ucal
yptu
s ci
nere
aM
ealy
Stri
ngyb
ark
13m
x 6
m37
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.44
36E
ucal
yptu
s ca
mal
dule
nsis
Riv
er R
ed G
um14
m x
12m
45G
ood
Fair
40+
year
sE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
reR
etai
n5.
4
37A
caci
a m
elan
oxyl
onB
lack
woo
d6m
x 2
m16
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
38M
elal
euca
lina
riifo
liaS
now
in S
umm
er6m
x 5
m21
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
52
39C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
13m
x 6
m35
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.2
40C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um16
m x
7m
32G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sR
etai
n3.
84
41C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um16
m x
9m
43G
ood
Poo
r20
-40
year
sP
rune
cod
omin
ant a
t 6m
Ret
ain
5.16
42C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um17
m x
9m
46P
oor
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee is
in d
eclin
eN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g5.
52
43E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk13
m x
10m
44G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.28
44E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk13
m x
14m
56G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Red
uctio
n pr
unin
g re
quire
dR
etai
n6.
72
45E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um13
m x
8m
59Fa
irP
oor
1-5
year
sTr
ee is
in d
eclin
e, B
rack
et fu
ngi
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
7.08
46C
asua
rina
cunn
ingh
amia
naR
iver
She
- O
ak16
m x
8m
46G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.52
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
47E
ucal
yptu
s le
ucox
ylon
Yel
low
Gum
10m
x 8
m44
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n5.
28
48E
ucal
yptu
s le
ucox
ylon
Yel
low
Gum
7m x
5m
12G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
49E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um12
m x
8m
55Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6.6
50E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um12
m x
7m
54P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6.48
51E
ucal
yptu
s le
ucox
ylon
Yel
low
Gum
6m x
6m
18G
ood
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
16
52A
caci
a flo
ribun
daC
atki
n W
attle
6m x
5m
12Fa
irP
oor
1-5
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
53C
allis
tem
on s
alig
nus
Will
ow B
ottle
Bru
sh5m
x 4
m9
Fair
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
54C
allis
tem
on s
alig
nus
Will
ow B
ottle
Bru
sh6m
x 4
m14
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
55C
allis
tem
on s
alig
nus
Will
ow B
ottle
Bru
sh6m
x 3
m15
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
56A
caci
a sa
ligna
Wes
tern
Aus
tralia
n G
olde
n W
attle
6m x
4m
9G
ood
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
57C
allis
tem
on v
imin
alis
Wee
ping
Bot
tle B
rush
5m x
4m
18G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
16
58C
allis
tem
on v
imin
alis
Wee
ping
Bot
tle B
rush
5m x
5m
26G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n3.
12
59C
allis
tem
on v
imin
alis
Wee
ping
Bot
tle B
rush
5m x
3m
11G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
60P
ittos
poru
m u
ndul
atum
Sw
eet P
ittos
poru
m5m
x 5
m16
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sE
nviro
nmen
tal w
eed
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
61C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um12
m x
5m
22G
ood
Fair
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
64
62E
ucal
yptu
s oc
cide
ntal
isS
wam
p Y
ate
10m
x 3
m17
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.04
63E
ucal
yptu
s vi
min
alis
Man
na G
um14
m x
12m
62Fa
irG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
7.44
64E
ucal
yptu
s oc
cide
ntal
isS
wam
p Y
ate
14m
x 8
m46
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
reN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g5.
52
65E
ucal
yptu
s oc
cide
ntal
isS
wam
p Y
ate
12m
x 8
m39
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee is
in d
eclin
eN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g4.
68
66E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk14
m x
12m
39G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.68
67E
ucal
yptu
s oc
cide
ntal
isS
wam
p Y
ate
16m
x 1
2m59
Goo
dP
oor
1-5
year
sTr
unk
deca
y, T
ree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
7.08
68E
ucal
yptu
s si
dero
xylo
nR
ed Ir
onba
rk12
m x
10m
46G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.52
69E
ucal
yptu
s cl
adoc
alyx
Sug
ar G
um17
m x
10m
58G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
6.96
70E
ucal
yptu
s cl
adoc
alyx
Sug
ar G
um16
m x
10m
48Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
reIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
5.76
71E
ucal
yptu
s ro
bust
aS
wam
p M
ahog
any
8m x
3m
33Fa
irP
oor
1-5
year
sE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
reN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
96
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
72C
asua
rina
cunn
ingh
amia
naR
iver
She
- O
ak9m
x 4
m28
Fair
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.36
73M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
7m x
4m
25Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3
74M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
5m x
2m
9Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
75M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
6m x
3m
13Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
76M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
6m x
3m
16Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
77M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
7m x
3m
17Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
04
78E
ucal
yptu
s ni
chol
iiN
arro
w-le
aved
Bla
ck
Pep
perm
int
8m x
5m
33Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.96
79E
ucal
yptu
s ni
chol
iiN
arro
w-le
aved
Bla
ck
Pep
perm
int
10m
x 6
m44
Poo
rFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Tree
is in
dec
line,
rem
ove
Pitt
ospo
rum
s at
bas
e.N
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g5.
28
80M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
8m x
5m
36G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.32
81M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
8m x
4m
19G
ood
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.28
82E
ucal
yptu
s le
ucox
ylon
Yel
low
Gum
8m x
4m
19Fa
irG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
28
83P
ittos
poru
m u
ndul
atum
Sw
eet P
ittos
poru
m4m
x 3
m10
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Env
ironm
enta
l wee
dN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
84C
asua
rina
cunn
ingh
amia
naR
iver
She
- O
ak14
m x
7m
37P
oor
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Tree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.44
85E
ucal
yptu
s le
ucox
ylon
Yel
low
Gum
8m x
5m
24G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
88
86E
ucal
yptu
s ni
chol
iiN
arro
w-le
aved
Bla
ck
Pep
perm
int
11m
x 9
m68
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n8.
16
87M
elal
euca
sty
phel
ioid
esP
rickl
y P
aper
bark
7m x
5m
33Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.96
88E
ucal
yptu
s sp
.G
um7m
x 2
m17
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
reN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
04
89C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um15
m x
7m
34V
ery
Poo
rG
ood
40+
year
sR
etai
n4.
08
90C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um15
m x
7m
38V
ery
Poo
rG
ood
40+
year
sR
etai
n4.
56
91C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um4m
x 2
m4
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsR
egro
wth
from
stu
mp
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
92C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um9m
x 2
m17
Goo
dG
ood
40+
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.04
93P
ittos
poru
m u
ndul
atum
Sw
eet P
ittos
poru
m3m
x 2
m7
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
94P
runu
s pe
rsic
aP
each
/Nec
tarin
e4m
x 3
m10
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
95C
orym
bia
mac
ulat
aS
potte
d G
um16
m x
12m
53G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sR
etai
n6.
36
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
96P
ittos
poru
m u
ndul
atum
Sw
eet P
ittos
poru
m5m
x 4
m20
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.4
97S
yzyg
ium
aus
trale
Bru
sh C
herry
3m x
2m
10P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
98C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
7m x
2m
10G
ood
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
99C
orym
bia
citri
odor
aLe
mon
-sce
nted
Gum
10m
x 6
m24
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
88
100
Cor
ymbi
a ci
triod
ora
Lem
on-s
cent
ed G
um9m
x 5
m23
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
76
101
Euc
alyp
tus
occi
dent
alis
Sw
amp
Yat
e9m
x 4
m17
Goo
dFa
ir20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.04
102
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
7m x
2m
11G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Reg
row
th fr
om s
tum
pN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
103
Euc
alyp
tus
obliq
uaM
essm
ate
Stri
ngyb
ark
10m
x 4
m17
Dea
dP
oor
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.04
104
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
14m
x 7
m37
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.44
105
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
4m x
2m
10Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
106
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
13m
x 1
0m54
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sE
vide
nce
of p
revi
ous
bran
ch
failu
re, p
runi
ng re
quire
d if
tree
is
reta
ined
.
Ret
ain
6.48
107
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh5m
x 3
m10
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
108
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh4m
x 3
m11
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
109
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh5m
x 4
m16
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
110
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
5m x
4m
14Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
111
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh5m
x 4
m20
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.4
112
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
8m x
6m
44P
oor
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g5.
28
113
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
14m
x 8
m37
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.44
114
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
5m x
2m
8G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
115
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
7m x
3m
11G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
116
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
8m x
3m
14G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
117
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
5m x
3m
10G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
118
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
6m x
2m
10G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
119
Euc
alyp
tus
occi
dent
alis
Sw
amp
Yat
e6m
x 3
m15
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
120
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
8m x
2m
10G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
121
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
7m x
2m
9G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
122
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
4m x
1m
5G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
123
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
4m x
1m
6G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
124
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
14m
x 1
2m55
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n6.
6
125
Euc
alyp
tus
cosm
ophy
llaC
up G
um4m
x 3
m11
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
126
Aca
cia
salig
naW
este
rn A
ustra
lian
Gol
den
Wat
tle4m
x 2
m11
Poo
rP
oor
1-5
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
127
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
7m x
1m
7G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
128
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk5m
x 3
m12
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
129
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
8m x
4m
23Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.76
130
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
7m x
3m
21Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.52
131
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh4m
x 3
m14
Fair
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
132
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk8m
x 5
m30
Fair
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.6
133
Euc
alyp
tus
robu
sta
Sw
amp
Mah
ogan
y13
m x
12m
73Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Tree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
8.76
134
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
7m x
2m
14G
ood
Poo
r20
-40
year
sP
rune
cod
omin
ant
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
135
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
14m
x 1
0m57
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
6.84
136
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk7m
x 5
m23
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
76
137
Euc
alyp
tus
clad
ocal
yxS
ugar
Gum
15m
x 9
m54
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Cod
omin
ant a
nd e
vide
nce
of
prev
ious
bra
nch
failu
reIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
6.48
138
Euc
alyp
tus
clad
ocal
yxS
ugar
Gum
15m
x 1
2m64
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
7.68
139
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
5m x
2m
13G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
140
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um6m
x 7
m27
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
unk
deca
yN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
24
141
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
12m
x 7
m30
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.6
142
Euc
alyp
tus
scop
aria
Wal
lang
arra
Gum
14m
x 1
2m57
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n6.
84
143
Acm
ena
smith
iiLi
lly P
illy
7m x
3m
20P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.4
144
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk9m
x 6
m45
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
5.4
145
Acm
ena
smith
iiLi
lly P
illy
7m x
3m
15P
oor
Poo
r0
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
146
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk5m
x 4
m17
Fair
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.04
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
147
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t11
m x
8m
57Fa
irP
oor
5-10
yea
rsTr
unk
deca
yN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g6.
84
148
Hak
ea p
etio
laris
Sea
Urc
hin
Hak
ea9m
x 5
m18
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.16
149
Cal
liste
mon
sal
ignu
sW
illow
Bot
tle B
rush
9m x
3m
23Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.76
150
Cal
liste
mon
sal
ignu
sW
illow
Bot
tle B
rush
9m x
3m
15Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
151
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
5m x
3m
44G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
5.28
152
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
5m x
3m
37G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.44
153
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
5m x
3m
33G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.96
154
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
6m x
3m
27Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
24
155
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
7m x
4m
40Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.8
156
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t13
m x
10m
42G
ood
Goo
d10
-20
year
sR
etai
n5.
04
157
Cal
liste
mon
sal
ignu
sW
illow
Bot
tle B
rush
6m x
3m
13Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
158
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t11
m x
7m
32Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.84
159
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t11
m x
8m
42G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n5.
04
160
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
10m
x 3
m23
Poo
rFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.76
161
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um8m
x 5
m20
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
4
162
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
14m
x 8
m37
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.44
163
Euc
alyp
tus
vim
inal
isM
anna
Gum
16m
x 1
0m90
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n10
.8
164
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
6m x
2m
14Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
165
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
16m
x 8
m46
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.52
166
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
15m
x 1
0m52
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n6.
24
167
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um8m
x 6
m19
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.28
168
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um7m
x 6
m29
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.48
169
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
15m
x 8
m33
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.96
170
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
15m
x 7
m31
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.72
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
171
Euc
alyp
tus
conf
erru
min
ata
Bus
hy Y
ate
8m x
8m
18P
oor
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee is
rubb
ing
on a
djac
ent
spot
ted
gum
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.16
172
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
15m
x 9
m36
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.32
173
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
2m
18P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.16
174
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
2m
20P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.4
175
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
15m
x 8
m35
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.2
176
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
15m
x 8
m32
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.84
177
Euc
alyp
tus
virid
isG
reen
Mal
lee
8m x
8m
25G
ood
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3
178
Mel
aleu
ca n
esop
hila
Sho
wy
Pap
erba
rk5m
x 4
m21
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
52
179
Euc
alyp
tus
cine
rea
Mea
ly S
tring
ybar
k10
m x
5m
27G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Cod
omin
ant a
nd in
clud
edN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
24
180
Aca
cia
mea
rnsi
iB
lack
Wat
tle13
m x
7m
38G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Tree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.56
181
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
15m
x 1
0m43
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.16
182
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
8m x
5m
22P
oor
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee is
in d
eclin
eN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
64
183
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
8m x
5m
25G
ood
Has
Fai
led
0 ye
ars
Act
ive
split
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3
184
Aca
cia
mel
anox
ylon
Bla
ckw
ood
6m x
2m
8G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Sev
eral
suc
kers
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
185
Aca
cia
mel
anox
ylon
Bla
ckw
ood
7m x
2m
15G
ood
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
186
Euc
alyp
tus
botry
oide
sS
outh
ern
Mah
ogan
y13
m x
12m
53G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Cod
omin
ant a
nnd
incl
uded
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6.36
187
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
6m x
4m
14Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
188
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
7m x
5m
30G
ood
Fair
5-10
yea
rsIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.6
189
Euc
alyp
tus
vim
inal
isM
anna
Gum
11m
x 7
m52
Fair
Ver
y po
or0
year
sR
emov
e as
soo
n as
pos
sibl
eN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g6.
24
190
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
6m x
4m
17Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.04
191
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
6m x
4m
19G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
28
192
Euc
alyp
tus
vim
inal
isM
anna
Gum
16m
x 1
2m52
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n6.
24
193
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
14m
x 8
m38
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
4.56
194
Euc
alyp
tus
cine
rea
Mea
ly S
tring
ybar
k16
m x
10m
53P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Tree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6.36
195
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
16m
x 1
0m39
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n4.
68
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
196
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
9m x
5m
30D
ead
Poo
r0
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
6
197
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
10m
x 7
m27
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.24
198
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
14m
x 1
0m47
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.64
199
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um8m
x 8
m38
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n4.
56
200
Mel
aleu
ca b
ract
eata
Bla
ck T
ea-tr
ee7m
x 5
m22
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
64
201
Cal
liste
mon
sal
ignu
sW
illow
Bot
tle B
rush
8m x
4m
19P
oor
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.28
202
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um9m
x 6
m24
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
2.88
203
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle7m
x 6
m36
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.32
204
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle7m
x 6
m32
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.84
205
Loph
oste
mon
con
fertu
sQ
ueen
slan
d B
rush
Box
6m x
3m
13Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2
206
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh4m
x 6
m20
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
4
207
Cal
liste
mon
vim
inal
isW
eepi
ng B
ottle
Bru
sh4m
x 4
m17
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
04
208
Euc
alyp
tus
vim
inal
isM
anna
Gum
10m
x 7
m27
Poo
rP
oor
1-5
year
sTr
unk
deca
y, T
ree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.24
209
Lagu
naria
pat
erso
nia
Nor
folk
Isla
nd H
ibis
cus
10m
x 7
m33
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n3.
96
210
Lagu
naria
pat
erso
nia
Nor
folk
Isla
nd H
ibis
cus
10m
x 6
m33
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n3.
96
211
Mel
aleu
ca la
nceo
lata
Moo
nah
7m x
4m
18G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.16
212
Euc
alyp
tus
vim
inal
isM
anna
Gum
11m
x 5
m28
Fair
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Trun
k de
cay
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.36
213
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
14m
x 1
1m38
Goo
dP
oor
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.56
214
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
8m x
8m
76Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
9.12
215
Mel
aleu
ca li
narii
folia
Sno
w in
Sum
mer
7m x
5m
55Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6.6
216
Lagu
naria
pat
erso
nia
Nor
folk
Isla
nd H
ibis
cus
10m
x 5
m23
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
76
217
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um10
m x
6m
27G
ood
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.24
218
Aca
cia
cogn
ata
Riv
er W
attle
7m x
5m
17V
ery
Poo
rV
ery
poor
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.04
219
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
8m x
3m
15G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
220
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um10
m x
8m
38G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.56
221
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
16m
x 1
4m59
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
emov
e ha
ngin
g br
anch
.R
etai
n7.
08
222
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk8m
x 4
m22
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2.
64
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
223
Euc
alyp
tus
cine
rea
Mea
ly S
tring
ybar
k9m
x 5
m27
Poo
rFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Tree
is in
dec
line
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.24
224
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
9m x
5m
24G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
2.88
225
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
19m
x 8
m48
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.76
226
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
22m
x 9
m62
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
7.44
227
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk6m
x 2
m10
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
228
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk5m
x 2
m10
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
229
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
7m x
2m
12G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
230
Cal
liste
mon
sal
ignu
sW
illow
Bot
tle B
rush
8m x
3m
20V
ery
Poo
rP
oor
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.4
231
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um9m
x 8
m24
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
88
232
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle9m
x 4
m26
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
12
233
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
19m
x 8
m38
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.56
234
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
21m
x 1
1m52
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
6.24
235
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk7m
x 4
m24
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
88
236
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk9m
x 5
m32
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
3.84
237
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk9m
x 5
m39
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n4.
68
238
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk8m
x 6
m40
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g4.
8
239
Rob
inia
pse
udoa
caci
aB
lack
Loc
ust
4m x
4m
16Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
240
Rob
inia
pse
udoa
caci
aB
lack
Loc
ust
5m x
4m
19Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.28
241
Rob
inia
pse
udoa
caci
aB
lack
Loc
ust
5m x
4m
17Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.04
242
Cor
ymbi
a ci
triod
ora
Lem
on-s
cent
ed G
um10
m x
5m
27G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.24
243
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle10
m x
6m
34Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Evi
denc
e of
pre
viou
s br
anch
fa
ilure
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.08
244
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle8m
x 6
m23
Fair
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Evi
denc
e of
pre
viou
s br
anch
fa
ilure
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.76
245
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle8m
x 8
m39
Fair
Poo
r5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
4.68
246
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle4m
x 3
m22
Poo
rP
oor
1-5
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
64
247
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
18m
x 1
0m62
Fair
Goo
d20
-40
year
sR
etai
n7.
44
248
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk9m
x 5
m33
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
96
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
249
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk6m
x 3
m25
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3
250
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle8m
x 1
0m50
Fair
Has
Fai
led
0 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
6
251
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um4m
x 3
m14
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2
252
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
4m
33Fa
irP
oor
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee h
as b
een
lopp
edN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
96
253
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
4m
33G
ood
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee h
as b
een
lopp
edN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
96
254
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
5m
30G
ood
Fair
5-10
yea
rsN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
6
255
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
11m
x 8
m49
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee h
as b
een
lopp
ed fo
r pow
er
lines
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
5.88
256
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
12m
x 6
m40
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
4.8
257
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
3m
23Fa
irP
oor
1-5
year
sTr
ee h
as b
een
lopp
ed, r
emov
e de
ad tr
ee a
djac
ent
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.76
258
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
13m
x 9
m54
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
etai
n6.
48
259
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
8m x
4m
20Fa
irFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
4
260
Euc
alyp
tus
lehm
anni
iM
alle
e8m
x 7
m22
Fair
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
2.64
261
Euc
alyp
tus
cosm
ophy
llaC
up G
um6m
x 4
m18
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2.16
262
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk8m
x 5
m30
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
3.6
263
Euc
alyp
tus
salig
naS
ydne
y B
lue
Gum
12m
x 4
m28
Fair
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.36
264
Euc
alyp
tus
sp.
Gum
8m x
4m
15G
ood
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
2
265
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk9m
x 6
m31
Fair
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.72
266
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk8m
x 4
m32
Fair
Goo
d10
-20
year
sIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
3.84
267
Euc
alyp
tus
poly
anth
emos
Red
Box
10m
x 8
m40
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sTr
ee h
as b
een
lopp
edIf
poss
ible
, ret
ain
4.8
268
Euc
alyp
tus
cosm
ophy
llaC
up G
um7m
x 5
m30
Ver
y P
oor
Poo
r0
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
6
269
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk9m
x 4
m33
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g3.
96
270
Mel
aleu
ca s
typh
elio
ides
Pric
kly
Pap
erba
rk8m
x 4
m22
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g2.
64
271
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t9m
x 8
m43
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Ret
ain
5.16
272
Cor
ymbi
a m
acul
ata
Spo
tted
Gum
4m x
2m
5G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n2
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
273
Allo
casu
arin
a lit
tora
lisB
lack
She
-oak
8m x
6m
45Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Tree
has
bee
n lo
pped
Not
wor
th re
tain
ing
5.4
274
Euc
alyp
tus
poly
anth
emos
Red
Box
11m
x 6
m35
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sTr
ee h
as b
een
lopp
ed b
ut
stru
ctur
e st
ill re
ason
able
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n4.
2
275
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
11m
x 7
m42
Goo
dP
oor
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee is
on
a le
an a
nd n
ot g
ood
cand
idat
e fo
r ret
entio
nN
ot w
orth
reta
inin
g5.
04
276
Cor
ymbi
a ci
triod
ora
Lem
on-s
cent
ed G
um11
m x
8m
33G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Upp
er c
anop
y ha
s fa
iled
but
stru
ctur
e st
ill fa
ir, c
ould
be
reta
ined
If po
ssib
le, r
etai
n3.
96
277
Pop
ulus
can
esce
nsG
rey
Pop
lar
14m
x 3
m30
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Larg
e th
icke
t of m
any
suck
erin
g sp
ecim
ens
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p3.
6
278
Euc
alyp
tus
salig
naS
ydne
y B
lue
Gum
16m
x 8
m36
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p4.
32
279
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
11m
x 9
m46
Goo
dG
ood
10-2
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p5.
52
280
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
9m x
4m
22G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p2.
64
281
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
20m
x 1
6m83
Goo
dFa
ir20
-40
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
9.96
282
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
8m x
3m
17G
ood
Fair
5-10
yea
rsR
egro
wth
from
stu
mp
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p2.
04
283
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle7m
x 6
m30
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
3.6
284
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
9m x
5m
27G
ood
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p3.
24
285
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t5m
x 4
m13
Fair
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Reg
row
th fr
om s
tum
pTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
2
286
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t5m
x 2
m17
Fair
Fair
1-5
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
2.04
287
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
14m
x 1
0m64
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
7.68
288
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
13m
x 8
m32
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
3.84
289
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
10m
x 1
0m47
Fair
Fair
10-2
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p5.
64
290
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
13m
x 7
m43
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p5.
16
291
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
10m
x 7
m42
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
5.04
292
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
1m x
1m
1G
ood
Fair
40+
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
2
293
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
19m
x 1
2m68
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p8.
16
294
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
1m x
1m
1G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
2
295
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
1m x
1m
1G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
2
296
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um9m
x 6
m26
Fair
Fair
5-10
yea
rsTr
ee is
in d
eclin
eTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
3.12
Refer
ence
: 25
98
IDB
otan
ical
Nam
eC
omm
on N
ame
Can
opy
Dim
ensi
ons
DB
H
(cm
)H
ealth
Stru
ctur
eU
LEC
omm
ents
Ret
entio
n Va
lue
TPZ
radi
us
(m)
297
Euc
alyp
tus
leuc
oxyl
onY
ello
w G
um14
m x
10m
48G
ood
Goo
d20
-40
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
5.76
298
Euc
alyp
tus
nich
olii
Nar
row
-leav
ed B
lack
P
eppe
rmin
t12
m x
12m
47G
ood
Has
Fai
led
0 ye
ars
Not
ified
Kno
xCC
trun
k ha
s ac
tive
split
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p5.
64
299
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
10m
x 6
m27
Goo
dG
ood
20-4
0 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p3.
24
300
Euc
alyp
tus
side
roxy
lon
Red
Iron
bark
13m
x 8
m42
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sR
educ
e no
rther
n st
emTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
5.04
301
Cup
ress
us m
acro
carp
a 'A
urea
'M
onte
rey
Cyp
ress
15m
x 1
0m95
Goo
dFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Cod
omin
ant t
runk
s w
ith in
clud
ed
bark
.Th
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
11.4
302
Euc
alyp
tus
cam
aldu
lens
isR
iver
Red
Gum
2m x
2m
1G
ood
Goo
d40
+ ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p2
303
Mel
aleu
ca a
rmill
aris
Gia
nt H
oney
Myr
tle7m
x 8
m52
Fair
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Tree
is s
tarti
ng to
fail
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p6.
24
304
Euc
alyp
tus
botry
oide
sS
outh
ern
Mah
ogan
y15
m x
9m
49Fa
irFa
ir5-
10 y
ears
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p5.
88
305
Gre
ville
a ro
bust
aS
ilky
Oak
16m
x 1
2m60
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sB
roke
n br
anch
in c
anop
yTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
7.2
306
Cas
uarin
a cu
nnin
gham
iana
Riv
er S
he -
Oak
16m
x 9
m42
Goo
dFa
ir10
-20
year
sTh
ird p
arty
ow
ners
hip
5.04
307
Euc
alyp
tus
man
nife
raB
rittle
Gum
7m x
7m
18G
ood
Poo
r1-
5 ye
ars
Third
par
ty o
wne
rshi
p2.
16
Refer
ence
: 25
98
Arborist Report Westfield Design Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna South
Reference: 2598
Appendix 4. Photographic Tree Reports
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: Very GoodDBH (cm) 35
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Good
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Medium
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 14m x 6m
Tree Number: 1
TPZ Radius (m) 4.2
Health: Very GoodDBH (cm) 50
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Good
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: Medium
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 15m x 8m
Tree Number: 2
TPZ Radius (m) 6
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 10
Retention Value: If possible, retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Good
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Negligible
Individual Significance: Negligible
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 6m x 2m
Tree Number: 3
TPZ Radius (m) 2
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: Very GoodDBH (cm) 34
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Good
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments: Tree is growing with a restricted root volume
Canopy Dimensions: 15m x 6m
Tree Number: 4
TPZ Radius (m) 4.08
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 26
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Good
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments: Tree is growing with a restricted root volume
Canopy Dimensions: 12m x 5m
Tree Number: 5
TPZ Radius (m) 3.12
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 49
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Good
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments: Tree is growing with a restricted root volume
Canopy Dimensions: 15m x 8m
Tree Number: 6
TPZ Radius (m) 5.88
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 15
Retention Value: If possible, retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments: Prune codominant
Canopy Dimensions: 7m x 5m
Tree Number: 7
TPZ Radius (m) 2
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 30
Retention Value: Not worth retaining
ULE: 5-10 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Low
Comments: Evidence of previous branch failures
Canopy Dimensions: 11m x 6m
Tree Number: 8
TPZ Radius (m) 3.6
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 19
Retention Value: If possible, retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Good
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 8m x 3m
Tree Number: 9
TPZ Radius (m) 2.28
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: DeadDBH (cm) 35
Retention Value: Not worth retaining
ULE: 0 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 16m x 6m
Tree Number: 10
TPZ Radius (m) 4.2
Health: DeadDBH (cm) 28
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 0 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 13m x 4m
Tree Number: 11
TPZ Radius (m) 3.36
Health: DeadDBH (cm) 27
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 0 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 11m x 4m
Tree Number: 12
TPZ Radius (m) 3.24
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 50
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia maculata
Structure: Fair
Common Name: Spotted Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 16m x 8m
Tree Number: 13
TPZ Radius (m) 6
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 30
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Good
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Medium
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 15m x 6m
Tree Number: 14
TPZ Radius (m) 3.6
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 26
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Good
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Medium
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 13m x 6m
Tree Number: 15
TPZ Radius (m) 3.12
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 32
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Good
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 15m x 7m
Tree Number: 16
TPZ Radius (m) 3.84
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 32
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Good
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 13m x 8m
Tree Number: 17
TPZ Radius (m) 3.84
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 15
Retention Value: Not worth retaining
ULE: 10-20 years
Botanical Name: Melaleuca linariifolia
Structure: Fair
Common Name: Snow in Summer
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 5m x 4m
Tree Number: 18
TPZ Radius (m) 2
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: FairDBH (cm) 28
Retention Value: Not worth retaining
ULE: 5-10 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Fair
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: Low
Individual Significance: Low
Comments: Tree is in decline
Canopy Dimensions: 11m x 6m
Tree Number: 19
TPZ Radius (m) 3.36
Health: PoorDBH (cm) 35
Retention Value: Not worth retaining
ULE: 0 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: Negligible
Individual Significance: Negligible
Comments: Tree is in decline, Decay and bracket fungi
Canopy Dimensions: 10m x 8m
Tree Number: 20
TPZ Radius (m) 4.2
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 30
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 20-40 years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Fair
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments: Tree in conflict with powerline
Canopy Dimensions: 10m x 10m
Tree Number: 21
TPZ Radius (m) 3.6
Reference: 2598
Preconstruction Assessment
Knox City Shopping Centre, 425 Burwood Highway, Wantirna SouthWestfield Design
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 76
Retention Value: Not worth retaining
ULE: 10-20 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus viminalis
Structure: Poor
Common Name: Manna Gum
Origin: Indigenous
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Low
Comments: Trunk decay
Canopy Dimensions: 15m x 16m
Tree Number: 22
TPZ Radius (m) 9.12
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 64
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 10-20 years
Botanical Name: Eucalyptus sideroxylon
Structure: Fair
Common Name: Red Ironbark
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: High
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 14m x 10m
Tree Number: 23
TPZ Radius (m) 7.68
Health: GoodDBH (cm) 25
Retention Value: Retain
ULE: 40+ years
Botanical Name: Corymbia citriodora
Structure: Good
Common Name: Lemon-scented Gum
Origin: Native
Landscape Contribution: Medium
Individual Significance: Moderate
Comments:
Canopy Dimensions: 13m x 6m
Tree Number: 24
TPZ Radius (m) 3
Reference: 2598
top related