ba 372 - final presentation updated 3
Post on 10-Apr-2017
108 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Executive Appointee Process Resolution
AlMaghrabi, Sultan S. AlRasheed, Rayan A. Awana, Sarah A. Knapp, Gergory C. Masuno, Ryan K. Zhou, Kehui.
College of Business Prof. Rene F. Reitsma, Ph.D
BA 372 6/4/2014
Overview of System Problems & its Resolution • Current System Major Problems:
1) Process Breaks Easily. 2) Lack of Transparency. 3) Time Consuming Processes. 4) Money/Resource Consuming Processes. 5) Limits the CooperaKon between the Departments. 6) Creates a BoOleneck at the IT Sub process of the System.
» (IT Sub process) Used when an error was made in the informaKon provided under the Senate Rules Staff.
April 28, 2015 2
Overview of System Problems & its Resolution • New System ImplementaKon: • It’s a web-‐based data entry app which connects directly to the DESK database.
• Data is inpuOed directly from terminals in the Governor’s office and which is instantly accessible in the enKre DESK system.
• The data will remain visible to the governor and editable via the web-‐app up unKl the official submission deadline.
April 28, 2015 3
The Impact of Change in the System:
• Expected Impact: 1. Increase efficiency of the system. 2. Decrease employee frustraKon when working on the system. 3. Decrease data redundancy. 4. Decrease the number of errors, that will reduce the number of system
crashes. 5. Reduce downKme, that will lower any late submissions. 6. Reduce overKme, that will lead to beOer system efficiency and less
employee frustraKon as well as save money. 7. Streamline the DESK database appointee submission process. 8. Governor will be able to make addiKons and changes to the appointee
list via the web-‐based app from a variety of devices and locaKons.
April 28, 2015 4
System Change Development
April 28, 2015 5
The Impact of Change in the System:
• Measurement of Impact:
April 28, 2015 6
Downtime Journal and interviews will be conducted by phone and/or email to capture the time spent during downtime, or the duration of the crash.
Functionality Rubric for evaluation for pre and post implementation. The rubric will identify the functionality by review conducted by those using the system
Frustration
Survey individuals involved in the executive appointment process. This survey would discover how the frustrations levels occurred prior to the implementation.
The Impact of Change in the System:
April 28, 2015 7
Efficiency
n = number of appointees
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
Total Labor Costs Equation =
Te = Time a particular worker allocates for process We = Wage rage of a particular worker Oe = Overtime a particular worker allocates for process Identifies how efficient process is by evaluating the mean cost of labor
per appointee.
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
n = number of appointees
Identifies how efficient the process is by evaluating output per number of steps in process.
-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐
n = number of appointees
Identifies how efficient the process is by evaluating output per the mean amount of errors occur per input.
The Process Model for the Existing System:
April 28, 2015 8
The Process Model for the ModiDied System:
April 28, 2015 9
New System Prototype Diagram
April 28, 2015 10
Demonstrate The System Prototype
April 28, 2015 11
Demonstrate The System Prototype
April 28, 2015 12
Demonstrate The System Prototype
April 28, 2015 13
Conclusion
April 28, 2015 14
• Core Problem • Sub-‐opKmized process
• EliminaKng/OpKmizing Data Transfer • Electronically and Physically
• New System Architecture
Any Questions?
April 28, 2015 15
Thank You
Have a Great Summer!
April 28, 2015 16
top related