bay village draft 2015 survey results
Post on 21-Jan-2017
390 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
February 8, 2016Bay Village City Council Presentation
Draft 2015 Survey ResultsCity of Bay Village
About County Planning
To inform and provide services in support of the short and long term comprehensive planning, quality of
life, environment, and economic development of Cuyahoga County
and its cities, villages and townships.“ ”
Local Expertise + Regional View
CPC Board Members by Region (8):Westshore: Honorable Eileen Patton
Mayor, City of Fairview Park
Southwest: Honorable Cyril KleemMayor, City of Berea
South Central: Honorable Michael P. ByrneMayor, City of Parma Heights
Cuyahoga: Honorable Michael ProcukMayor, Village of Brooklyn Heights
Cleveland: Mr. Freddie Collier Representing Mayor Jackson
Chagrin/SE: Honorable Brad SellersMayor, City of Warrensville Heights
Hillcrest: Honorable Merle GordenMayor, City of Beachwood
Heights: Honorable Susan K. Infeld Mayor, City of University Heights
Cuyahoga County Representatives (3):
Mr. Nathan Kelly, ChairMs. Sunny Simon, Vice ChairMs. Shontel Brown
Board Structure & Representation
2015 Community Master Plans
Cleveland Heights, University Heights, Parma Heights, and
Olmsted Falls
Beachwood Survey and Community Master Plan
Master plan covering land use, transportation, and economic development
Countywide Housing Study
Plan to determine housing needs, market demand, and
best practices
Place-Based Economic
Development PlanCountywide economic
development framework
Parma Town Center Task
ForcePlan for building and
branding the city center of Parma
GreenPrintTool for identifying,
preserving, and expanding environmental features
Eastside Greenway TLCI
Multi-modal transportation plan for eastside communities
Draft 2015 Survey ResultsCity of Bay Village
February 8, 2016Bay Village City Council Presentation
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
Methodology + Process
Formulated
QuestionsMailed
SurveysFollow-Up Postcard
Tabulated Results
Produced Report
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 Households
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 HouseholdsMailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 HouseholdsMailed Surveys 1,200 SurveysReturned Surveys 576 SurveysResponse Rate 48.0%
Bay Village SurveyTotal Households 6,043 HouseholdsMailed Surveys 1,200 SurveysReturned Surveys 576 SurveysResponse Rate 48.0%Confidence Level 95%Statistical Error Rate +/- 3.88
Results Report
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings• Demographics• Appendix A: Numerical Results• Appendix B: Comments• Appendix C: Survey Instrument
Detailed Findings
• City Qualities• Land Use• Community
Events• Parks and
Recreation
• Transportation• City Services• Housing• Important Issues• Quality of Life
City Qualities
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay VillageClose to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
Close to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay Village
Close to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay Village
Close to Lake Erie
Feel safe in my neighborhood
Quality school system
My property is a good investment
For the suburban environment
Close to family/friends
Well-maintained neighborhood
Offers type of housing I want
Easy access to Downtown Cleveland
High quality municipal services
Access to highways
Easy access to city's parks
Close to work
Housing costs fit budget
Close to shopping0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
56.0%
55.3%
50.3%
38.0%
29.1%
25.4%
25.4%
21.5%
15.8%
15.6%
13.3%
11.0%
9.1%
8.4%
4.9%
City Qualities
Reasons for Residing in Bay Village
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay VillageI would not consider moving
For lower taxesFor a different climate
For a smaller houseFor a retirement friendly community
For attached condos/clustered homesFor more home for my money
For a newer houseTo be closer to family and/or friends
For a larger houseTo be closer to work/job relatedFor better community facilitiesFor a more rural environment
To be able to walk placesTo be closer to Downtown Cleveland
For a higher quality of municipal servicesFor a rental unit
For better access to shoppingFor less traffic congestion
For a better school districtFor a safer community
To have better access to highways0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
27.2%
49.9%
20.8%
15.1%
13.1%
12.6%
12.6%
11.2%
9.8%
8.3%
8.2%
8.2%
7.1%
6.7%
3.7%
3.4%
2.3%
1.8%
1.2%
0.9%
0.7%
0.2%
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village
18 to 44 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house (27.8%)
• For more home for my money (27.8%)
• To be closer to work/job related (18.3%)
• For a different climate (18.3%)
45 to 64 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate (26.7%)
• For a smaller house (14.3%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%)
• For retirement friendly community (13.6%)
65+ Years Old
• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house (24.0%)
• For retirement friendly community (19.1%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%)
• To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village
18 to 44 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house (27.8%)
• For more home for my money (27.8%)
• To be closer to work/job related (18.3%)
• For a different climate (18.3%)
45 to 64 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate (26.7%)
• For a smaller house (14.3%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%)
• For retirement friendly community (13.6%)
65+ Years Old
• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house (24.0%)
• For retirement friendly community (19.1%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%)
• To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)
City Qualities
Considerations for Moving from Bay Village
18 to 44 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house (27.8%)
• For more home for my money (27.8%)
• To be closer to work/job related (18.3%)
• For a different climate (18.3%)
45 to 64 Year Olds
• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate (26.7%)
• For a smaller house (14.3%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%)
• For retirement friendly community (13.6%)
65+ Years Old
• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house (24.0%)
• For retirement friendly community (19.1%)
• For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%)
• To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)
Land Use
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
Environmentally friendly development is im-portant
New homes should match existing design
Maintain and attract retail/service stores
Focus on mixed-use development
Allow more townhouses/condos
Major streets should have decorative elements
Promote economic development
Allow more multi-family residential
Grow its population
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
26.9%
25.3%
14.3%
9.0%
10.2%
10.1%
7.4%
49.9%
35.5%
37.2%
35.1%
33.2%
32.1%
30.6%
11.1%
17.8%
22.8%
24.0%
30.7%
19.7%
36.6%
31.5%
17.6%
29.3%
14.0%
18.8%
17.4%
23.2%
17.7%
22.7%
39.9%
48.6%
7.8%
13.6%
7.7%
27.6%
14.5%
Land Use
Agree Neither Disagree
Opinions on Land Use Statements
Land Use
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age
46.7%62.1%
69.3%55.3%
46.6%
27.1% 26.2%
47.5% 50.6%
New homes should match the scale and
design of existing homes
Major streets should have decorative
elements (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts)
The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate
locations
Land Use
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age
46.7%62.1%
69.3%55.3%
46.6%
27.1% 26.2%
47.5% 50.6%
New homes should match the scale and
design of existing homes
Major streets should have decorative
elements (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts)
The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate
locations
Community Events
Community Events
Good Average Poor
Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night
BAYarts Art Festival
BAYarts Farm + Art Market
BAYarts Moondance
Bay Library Programs
Annual May in Bay 5K
Touch-a-Truck
Summer Fun Night
Bay Days
Bay Village Community Christmas
Cahoon in June
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.2%
34.8%
33.0%
38.7%
34.9%
30.4%
35.0%
25.6%
29.2%
27.0%
29.6%
49.4%
53.4%
49.5%
43.7%
46.6%
49.8%
45.1%
53.5%
48.8%
46.5%
42.7%
11.1%
13.8%
14.7%
15.8%
18.1%
16.4%
17.7%
18.5%
23.7%
23.3%
Opinions on Community Events
Community Events
Opinions on Community Events
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Touch-a-Truck 58.7%Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4%BAYarts Moondance 56.5%Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9%Summer Fun Night 53.4%Cahoon in June 53.3%BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0%Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night
27.2%
BAYarts Art Festival 25.5%Bay Library Programs 18.8%Bay Days 10.3%
Community Events
Opinions on Community Events
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Touch-a-Truck 58.7%Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4%BAYarts Moondance 56.5%Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9%Summer Fun Night 53.4%Cahoon in June 53.3%BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0%Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night
27.2%
BAYarts Art Festival 25.5%Bay Library Programs 18.8%Bay Days 10.3%
Gre
ater
tha
n 50
%Le
ss t
han
35%
Yes43.2%
No 11.8%
Not Sure
45.0%
Community Events
Would you like to see additional events?
Community Events
Would you like to see additional events?
18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+
64.1%57.6%
52.5%
36.8% 38.6%
16.7%
Community Events
Would you like to see additional events?
18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+
64.1%57.6%
52.5%
36.8% 38.6%
16.7%
Greater than 50%
Less than 40%
Parks and Recreation
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks)
Bay Village Family Aquatic Center
Cahoon Memorial Park
Bradley Park
Skate and Bike Park
Biking and Hiking Trails
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center
Reese Park (Clague Road)
Columbia Park
Community House
Community Gym/Fitness Room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
52.4%
39.6%
27.8%
21.8%
17.0%
20.3%
15.4%
13.7%
11.3%
8.2%
40.0%
47.0%
53.4%
57.5%
52.6%
48.6%
51.8%
49.3%
41.1%
37.0%
24.4%
9.4%
16.9%
19.0%
21.4%
22.6%
28.6%
34.1%
36.8%
42.0%
28.9%
6.9%
9.3%
12.5%
25.8% 15.3%
Good Average Poor
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks)
Bay Village Family Aquatic Center
Cahoon Memorial Park
Bradley Park
Skate and Bike Park
Biking and Hiking Trails
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center
Reese Park (Clague Road)
Columbia Park
Community House
Community Gym/Fitness Room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
52.4%
39.6%
27.8%
21.8%
17.0%
20.3%
15.4%
13.7%
11.3%
8.2%
40.0%
47.0%
53.4%
57.5%
52.6%
48.6%
51.8%
49.3%
41.1%
37.0%
24.4%
9.4%
16.9%
19.0%
21.4%
22.6%
28.6%
34.1%
36.8%
42.0%
28.9%
6.9%
9.3%
12.5%
25.8% 15.3%
Good Average Poor
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks)
Bay Village Family Aquatic Center
Cahoon Memorial Park
Bradley Park
Skate and Bike Park
Biking and Hiking Trails
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center
Reese Park (Clague Road)
Columbia Park
Community House
Community Gym/Fitness Room
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
52.4%
39.6%
27.8%
21.8%
17.0%
20.3%
15.4%
13.7%
11.3%
8.2%
40.0%
47.0%
53.4%
57.5%
52.6%
48.6%
51.8%
49.3%
41.1%
37.0%
24.4%
9.4%
16.9%
19.0%
21.4%
22.6%
28.6%
34.1%
36.8%
42.0%
28.9%
6.9%
9.3%
12.5%
25.8% 15.3%
Good Average Poor
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4%Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8%Skate and Bike Park 41.8%Community House 38.2%Columbia Park 30.0%Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0%Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7%Bradley Park 17.9%Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1%Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5%Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8%
Parks and Recreation
Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities
Event Percent with “No Opinion”
Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4%Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8%Skate and Bike Park 41.8%Community House 38.2%Columbia Park 30.0%Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0%Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7%Bradley Park 17.9%Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1%Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5%Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8%
Parks and Recreation
Ease of Access to Lake Erie
Parks and Recreation
Excellent41.8%
Good41.6%
Average10.5%
Poor5.4%
Very Poor0.7%
Yes29.1%
No 25.1%
Not Sure
45.8%
Would you like to see a new green space constructed next to City Hall?
Parks and Recreation
Overall Quality of Parks and Recreation Facilities
Parks and Recreation
Excellent27.3%
Good57.7%
Average14.3%
Poor0.5%
Very Poor0.2%
Transportation
Transportation
Opinions on Ease of Getting Around
Car
Walking
Bike
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
72.3%
46.2%
42.3%
12.9%
26.5%
43.3%
44.5%
24.2%
16.5%
7.6%
6.7%
56.1%
32.9% 28.8% 17.1%
Agree Neither Disagree
Transportation
Opinions on Ease of Getting Around
Car
Walking
Bike
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
72.3%
46.2%
42.3%
12.9%
26.5%
43.3%
44.5%
24.2%
16.5%
7.6%
6.7%
56.1%
32.9% 28.8% 17.1%
Agree Neither Disagree
Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around
High Average Low
Bike
Walking
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
Car0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20.7%
14.4%
13.5%
9.1%
9.1%
30.3%
26.1%
24.5%
18.2%
11.4%
23.7%
30.3%
32.5%
33.8%
26.6%
10.6%
11.6%
10.0%
17.2%
20.5%
14.7%
17.6%
19.5%
21.7%
32.5%
Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around
High Average Low
Bike
Walking
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
Car0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20.7%
14.4%
13.5%
9.1%
9.1%
30.3%
26.1%
24.5%
18.2%
11.4%
23.7%
30.3%
32.5%
33.8%
26.6%
10.6%
11.6%
10.0%
17.2%
20.5%
14.7%
17.6%
19.5%
21.7%
32.5%
Transportation
Priority for Improvements to Getting Around
High Average Low
Bike
Walking
Senior Transportation
Public Transit
Car0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20.7%
14.4%
13.5%
9.1%
9.1%
30.3%
26.1%
24.5%
18.2%
11.4%
23.7%
30.3%
32.5%
33.8%
26.6%
10.6%
11.6%
10.0%
17.2%
20.5%
14.7%
17.6%
19.5%
21.7%
32.5%
Condition of the City’s Sidewalks
Transportation
Excellent9.1%
Good45.0%
Aver-age
35.6%
Poor9.8%
Very Poor0.5%
City Services
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
City Services
Opinions on Quality of City ServicesFire protection/EMS
Police protectionPark maintenance
Trash removal & curbside recyclingCompost and brush recycling
Leaf collectionTraffic enforcement
Recreational programsSnow removal
Senior transportation servicesStreet maintenance/repair
Building departmentCity of Bay Village website
Tree lawn plantingProperty maintenance enforcement
Sidewalk correction programWater back up/sewer inspection
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
59.0%
53.2%
32.7%
36.9%
33.3%
35.1%
28.6%
20.8%
24.4%
16.7%
11.3%
11.9%
10.6%
12.6%
7.1%
8.3%
8.1%
37.8%
40.7%
56.6%
49.3%
49.5%
46.1%
48.1%
54.5%
47.8%
46.5%
42.7%
40.4%
40.0%
35.0%
37.9%
31.6%
24.0%
9.7%
11.5%
13.2%
14.2%
18.7%
21.7%
22.6%
25.4%
34.9%
37.9%
41.8%
33.2%
35.7%
38.6%
31.7%
9.6%
7.9%
6.3%
13.8%
14.0%
15.5%
20.1% 16.1%
Good Average Poor
City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Fire protection/EMSPolice protection
Trash removal & curbside recyclingSnow removal
Street maintenance/repairLeaf collection
Park maintenanceWater back up/sewer inspection
Compost and brush recyclingRecreational programs
Building departmentSidewalk correction program
Property maintenance enforcementTraffic enforcement
Senior transportation servicesTree lawn planting
City of Bay Village website0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
92.0%
89.6%
64.8%
75.5%
60.6%
65.7%
52.3%
66.8%
47.5%
37.8%
27.4%
28.5%
35.2%
34.0%
26.5%
19.2%
11.6%
7.5%
9.4%
33.4%
22.6%
37.5%
31.3%
44.5%
29.9%
43.6%
50.1%
54.6%
51.9%
44.9%
44.4%
45.7%
33.3%
38.1%
8.4%
10.0%
15.7%
17.9%
17.5%
19.0%
19.5%
34.7%
36.0%
8.3%
12.8%
14.3%
City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Fire protection/EMSPolice protection
Trash removal & curbside recyclingSnow removal
Street maintenance/repairLeaf collection
Park maintenanceWater back up/sewer inspection
Compost and brush recyclingRecreational programs
Building departmentSidewalk correction program
Property maintenance enforcementTraffic enforcement
Senior transportation servicesTree lawn planting
City of Bay Village website0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
92.0%
89.6%
64.8%
75.5%
60.6%
65.7%
52.3%
66.8%
47.5%
37.8%
27.4%
28.5%
35.2%
34.0%
26.5%
19.2%
11.6%
7.5%
9.4%
33.4%
22.6%
37.5%
31.3%
44.5%
29.9%
43.6%
50.1%
54.6%
51.9%
44.9%
44.4%
45.7%
33.3%
38.1%
8.4%
10.0%
15.7%
17.9%
17.5%
19.0%
19.5%
34.7%
36.0%
8.3%
12.8%
14.3%
City Services
Opinions on Importance of City Services
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Fire protection/EMSPolice protection
Trash removal & curbside recyclingSnow removal
Street maintenance/repairLeaf collection
Park maintenanceWater back up/sewer inspection
Compost and brush recyclingRecreational programs
Building departmentSidewalk correction program
Property maintenance enforcementTraffic enforcement
Senior transportation servicesTree lawn planting
City of Bay Village website0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
92.0%
89.6%
64.8%
75.5%
60.6%
65.7%
52.3%
66.8%
47.5%
37.8%
27.4%
28.5%
35.2%
34.0%
26.5%
19.2%
11.6%
7.5%
9.4%
33.4%
22.6%
37.5%
31.3%
44.5%
29.9%
43.6%
50.1%
54.6%
51.9%
44.9%
44.4%
45.7%
33.3%
38.1%
8.4%
10.0%
15.7%
17.9%
17.5%
19.0%
19.5%
34.7%
36.0%
8.3%
12.8%
14.3%
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
City Services
Matrix on Importance and QualityIn
crea
sing
qua
lity
Increasing importance
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Average quality
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Aver
age
impo
rtan
ce
City Services
Matrix on Importance and QualityAbove average quality, above
average importance
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Below average quality, above
average importance
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Below average quality, below
average importance
City Services
Matrix on Importance and Quality
Above average quality, below
average importance
Overall Quality of City Services
Excellent33.3%
Good57.9%
Average7.9%
Poor0.7%
Very Poor0.2%
City Services
Change in Overall Quality of City Services
Greatly Improved3.5%
Some-what Im-
proved33.0%
Stayed the Same
51.8%
Some-what
Declined10.7%
Greatly Declined0.9%
City Services
Housing
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
Maintain existing housing
More options for seniors
More single-family detached
More walkable options
More townhouses/condos
More options for young people
More infill development
More apartments/mixed-use
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
55.4%
19.9%
14.5%
9.1%
10.9%
8.7%
32.6%
28.2%
31.4%
24.4%
20.9%
21.1%
17.5%
8.8%
10.3%
35.7%
35.2%
40.5%
27.4%
41.7%
37.1%
24.5%
8.7%
12.3%
18.0%
20.1%
20.2%
20.3%
25.6%
7.6%
6.6%
8.0%
20.7%
11.2%
16.3%
36.0%
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
High Average Low
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options for seniors looking to
remain in the City
More well-designed single-family, detached
homes
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
19.5%
46.2%
70.6%58.5%
45.2%38.0%
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options for seniors looking to
remain in the City
More well-designed single-family, detached
homes
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
19.5%
46.2%
70.6%58.5%
45.2%38.0%
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options within walking distance
to amenities
More well-designed townhouses/condos
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
25.6%34.4% 37.4%
16.3%
35.3% 38.4%6.5%
15.3% 17.3%
More well-designed apartments/mixed-use
development
18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old 65 Years and Older
More housing options within walking distance
to amenities
More well-designed townhouses/condos
Housing
Priority for Types of Housing
25.6%34.4% 37.4%
16.3%
35.3% 38.4%6.5%
15.3% 17.3%
More well-designed apartments/mixed-use
development
Since residing in Bay Village, has your basement flooded?
Yes46.1%
No 41.2%
No Basement12.3%
Not Sure0.5%
Housing
If so, how many times has it flooded?
Housing
Once a month2.8%
Once every six (6) months
5.7%
Once a year9.5%
Once every few
years36.0%
Rarely45.9%
Important Issues
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Improving roads
Improving sidewalks
Providing recreational programs
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving traffic flow
Having a diverse community
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
82.0%
52.3%
50.2%
51.0%
33.0%
39.0%
30.1%
39.9%
27.6%
28.5%
18.0%
15.0%
12.7%
11.7%
14.1%
11.5%
16.4%
37.2%
38.1%
33.1%
50.4%
41.7%
47.1%
36.9%
44.2%
41.0%
36.4%
32.7%
31.5%
29.1%
26.5%
27.1%
9.4%
9.1%
13.1%
15.4%
16.2%
20.9%
16.3%
23.9%
26.0%
35.1%
31.6%
39.9%
38.4%
34.3%
30.3%
6.9%
10.5%
20.7%
15.9%
20.8%
25.0%
31.2%
Important Issues
Opinions on Importance of Issues
Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
Ensuring public safety
Preserving open space/green space
Providing recreational programs
Being able to safely bike to amenities
Improving traffic flow
Providing housing/services for seniors
Improving the sewer systems
Attracting new retail/services
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
46.4%
15.4%
18.1%
19.7%
18.1%
7.2%
9.6%
6.2%
44.6%
52.3%
48.8%
45.7%
44.0%
45.0%
38.2%
34.5%
31.5%
30.5%
21.8%
18.2%
17.6%
15.4%
13.3%
10.1%
8.6%
29.4%
28.5%
30.8%
33.8%
39.8%
41.8%
46.5%
58.1%
48.3%
56.7%
56.1%
42.1%
65.6%
61.3%
65.9%
6.6%
8.4%
9.2%
13.2%
16.5%
15.2%
21.1%
14.2%
20.7%
19.6%
15.7%
Important Issues
Opinions on Current Effectiveness
Good Average Poor
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Average effectiveness
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and ImportanceIn
crea
sing
eff
ecti
vene
ss
Increasing importance
Aver
age
impo
rtan
ce
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and ImportanceAbove average effectiveness,
above average importance
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Below average effectiveness,
above average importance
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Below average effectiveness, below average
importance
Important Issues
Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance
Above average effectiveness, below average
importance
Quality of Life
Quality of Life
Overall Quality of Life
Excel-lent
50.8%Good45.5%
Average3.5%
Poor0.2%
Comments
Quality of Life
Most Frequent Comments
• Parks and Recreation Facilities– Variety of park changes– Concerns about Cahoon Park
• Flooding and Sewer System– Roadway and basement flooding
• Animal Control– Deer population– Animal control officer
Quality of Life
Most Frequent Comments
• Housing– Fix housing that is deteriorating– Issues concerning infill housing
• Transportation– New crosswalks– Safer paths to school– Removal of snow
Demographics
Demographics
Age of Respondents
18 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
7.1%
15.2%
21.5%
24.0%
19.6%
12.7%
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
Demographics
Age of Respondents
18 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
7.1%
15.2%
21.5%
24.0%
19.6%
12.7%
10.4%
16.0%
24.7%
22.5%
15.3%
11.2%
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
Demographics
Length of Residency
Under 2 years
2-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21-30 years
More than 30 years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
4.9%
9.5%
11.2%
20.9%
21.1%
32.3%
Demographics
Planned Length of Residency
Under 2 years
2-5 years
6-10 years
11-20 years
21-30 years
More than 30 years
I do not intend to move out of
Bay Village0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50%
6.0%
11.6%
15.2%
16.3%
4.9%
1.8%
44.2%
Demographics
Tenure of Respondents
Homeowner97.4%
Renter2.6%
Demographics
Planned Tenure of Respondents
Owning94.6%
Renting5.4%
Demographics
Ages of Respondent Household Members
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
0 to 17
18 to 24
25 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
24.1%
8.3%
6.7%
9.6%
15.4%
15.9%
13.1%
6.9%
Demographics
Ages of Respondent Household Members
2015 Survey2014 American Community Survey
0 to 17
18 to 24
25 to 34
35 to 44
45 to 54
55 to 64
65 to 74
75+ years
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
24.1%
8.3%
6.7%
9.6%
15.4%
15.9%
13.1%
6.9%
24.4%
4.8%
8.6%
12.7%
16.5%
15.7%
9.7%
7.6%
Major Themes
• Proximity to Lake Erie, safety, and schools are the top reasons people choose to live in Bay Village
• Regardless of age, the prime reason residents would consider moving is for a community with lower taxes
• Young people are more likely to move for a larger house, while seniors are more likely to move for a smaller house
• More than half of respondents want the City to focus on environmentally friendly development, want new homes to match existing design, and want to maintain and attract retail and service stores
• More than half of respondents do not want more multi-family residential
• Growing the City’s population is not important to respondents
• Younger respondents and households with younger respondents want more community events
• The City’s parks are rated very highly
• There is potential to improve the Community House and Fitness Room
• Respondents would like to see improvements to the City’s sidewalks and bikeways
• Improvements to street maintenance and water back up/sewer inspection are key areas of importance
• Overall, respondents rate the City’s services very highly
• Overwhelmingly, respondents want to maintain existing housing and neighborhoods
• The City’s seniors would like more housing options—and want a range of townhouses, mixed-use buildings, single-family homes, and walkable neighborhoods
• Improving the sewer system, enforcing home maintenance ordinances, and improving sidewalks are key areas for respondents
• Quality of life in Bay Village is rated very highly across the board
• Methodology + Process• Results Report• Detailed Findings
Thank you!Questions?
top related