bay scallop fmp draft amendment 1

19
Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1 Marine Fisheries Commission Aug. 12, 2010 Investigating Adaptive Management of Bay Scallop Harvest Based on Measures of Abundance

Upload: fleur

Post on 24-Feb-2016

52 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1 . Investigating Adaptive Management of Bay Scallop Harvest Based on Measures of Abundance. Marine Fisheries Commission Aug. 12, 2010. Background. Bay scallop FMP finalized Nov 2007 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Bay Scallop FMPDraft Amendment 1

Marine Fisheries CommissionAug. 12, 2010

Investigating Adaptive Management of Bay Scallop Harvest Based on Measures

of Abundance

Page 2: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Background• Bay scallop FMP finalized Nov 2007

• Prohibited take occurred from 2006 – 2008 as part of the FMP management strategy

• Data on scallop abundance from the fishery independent sampling are evaluated annually as directed by the FMP

• Sampling in Core, Bogue, and Back sounds began to show an increase in abundance beginning in 2008

Page 3: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Target Re-opening Indicator• A standardized scallop population level

indicator was selected as a target for reopening the harvest season by the N. C. Marine Fisheries Commission at its January 2009 meeting

• This target was based on NCDMF sampling that occurred between the months of October and December in 1984 and 1985 for Back, Bogue, and Core sounds

Page 4: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Annual Commercial Landings1950 to 2005

Page 5: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Progressive Triggers• Allows flexibility in management

• Allows consideration of population variability in all areas each year

• Allows for limited bay scallop harvest while maintaining the FMP goal of rebuilding the stock to pre-red tide abundance levels

Page 6: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Back Sound Sampling Target (1984-85 lnCPUE) and Progressive

Triggers for Adaptive Management

Page 7: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Bogue Sound Sampling Target (1984-85 lnCPUE) and

Progressive Triggers for Adaptive Management

Page 8: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Core Sound Sampling Target (1984-85 lnCPUE) and

Progressive Triggers for Adaptive Management

Page 9: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Additional Items to Consider• Proclamation authority allows flexibility to

adjust seasons, trip limits or allowed gears based on current conditions

• 5-year review of the FMP in 2012

• Daily maximum allowed harvest is 20 bushels per person per day with a maximum of 40 bushels per day in any combined commercial fishing operation (15A NCAC 03K .0501)

Page 10: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Additional Items to Consider• Recreational harvest limits are now set in

proclamation

• Separation of gears and user groups to particular days of the week for easier enforcement

• Increase in commercial fishing effort due to improved harvest and open license

• Number who harvest bay scallops for recreational purposes is unknown

Page 11: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Management Options1. Status quo: Continue using only target

opening indicators, without progressive triggers for adaptive harvest

2. Consider adaptive management measures based on pre-determined progressive triggers for Core, Bogue, and Back sounds

3. Consider adaptive management measures for Pamlico Sound based on limited sampling with pre-determined progressive triggers

Page 12: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Management Options4. Use pre-determined target and progressive

triggers from Bogue Sound for opening areas south of Bogue Sound until a sampling time series is developed for a starting target level from this region

5. Continue to leave areas south of Bogue Sound closed to bay scallop harvest but consider adaptive management measures once a sampling time series is established to determine a target opening level

Page 13: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

• No public comments were received during any of the open meetings

Overview of Public Meetings

• NCDMF received comments from a special meeting with Mr. Henry Frost, Mr. Joey Frost and Dr. Pete Peterson

Committee AC Initial DMF Initial Crafted OwnNortheastShellfishH&WQ

SoutheastCentralInland

Page 14: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Other Items from Meetings• Use of dish detergent to improve visibility of

scallops to hand harvesters

• Study the impacts of hand harvest versus scallop dredge harvest on grass beds

• Change the definition of a scallop dredge to a scallop scrape

• Reinforce the need for a recreational shellfish license

Page 15: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

AC and NCDMF Recommendations

• Consider adaptive management measures in Bogue, Back, and Core sounds using progressive triggers of 50%, 75%, and 125% of the 1984-1985 target levels

• Consider adaptive management measures in Pamlico Sound using progressive triggers of 50%, 75%, and 125% of the January 2009 target level

Page 16: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

• Use adaptive management measures with progressive triggers from Bogue Sound as a proxy to open areas south of Bogue Sound until a sampling time series is established for an appropriate target in the areas south of Bogue Sound

AC and NCDMF Recommendations

Page 17: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Recommended Commercial Harvest Levels for the Progressive Triggers

Page 18: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Recommended Recreational Harvest Levels for the Progressive Triggers

Page 19: Bay Scallop FMP Draft Amendment 1

Research Recommendations• Expand the current bay scallop fishery

independent sampling to improve estimates of the population abundance and spawning condition of the stock

• Conduct research to study the impacts of scalloping activities on bay scallop habitat