chapter 11: financial reporting quality
Post on 02-Jan-2017
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
CHAPTER 11FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY
Presenter’s namePresenter’s titledd Month yyyy
2
FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY VS. QUALITY OF REPORTED RESULTS
Financial Reporting Quality• Decision-useful information• Faithful representation of
economic reality• Compliant with standards
Quality of Reported Results (aka “Earnings Quality”)
• Sustainable activity• Adequate returns• Increases the company’s value
3
FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY AND EARNINGS QUALITY ARE INTERRELATED
4
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTS
5
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTSExcerpt from Toyota Motor Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Results
“Consolidated vehicle unit sales in Japan and overseas decreased by 37 thousand units, or 1.6%, to 2,232 thousand units in FY2014 first quarter …compared with FY2013 first quarter…
“…operating income increased by ¥310.2 billion, or 87.9%, to ¥663.3 billion in FY2014 first quarter compared with FY2013 first quarter. The factors contributing to an increase in operating income were the effects of changes in exchange rates of ¥260.0 billion...
6
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTS• Biased accounting choices,
assumptions, estimates: - “Aggressive” choices increase a
company’s reported performance and financial position in the current period.
- “Conservative” choices decrease current reported performance but may increase future reported.
• Biased presentation choices:- Obscure unfavorable information
and/or- Emphasize favorable information.
7
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTSTRUMP HOTELS & CASINO RESORTS THIRD QUARTER RESULTSOctober 25, 1999
“EBITDA INCREASED TO $106.7 MILLION VS. $90.6 MILLION IN 1998 NET PROFIT INCREASED TO 63 CENTS PER SHARE VS. 24 CENTS PER SHARE IN 1998
…Net income increased to $14.0 million or $0.63 per share, before a one-time Trump World’s Fair charge, compared to $5.3 million or $0.24 per share in 1998.
8
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTS“EBITDA INCREASED TO $106.7 MILLION VS. $90.6 MILLION IN 1998 NET PROFIT INCREASED TO 63 CENTS PER SHARE VS. 24 CENTS PER SHARE IN 1998
“…Net income increased to $14.0 million or $0.63 per share, before a one-time Trump World’s Fair charge, compared to $5.3 million or $0.24 per share in 1998.”
The problem?• EBITDA of $106.7 excluded a one-time
charge but included a one-time gain.• GAAP Net Income—not shown in this
excerpt—was $67.5 million loss, not a $14 million profit.
9
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTSEarnings Management:
Deliberate actions to influence reported earnings
- Real Earnings Management, for example:
Defer R&D expenses into the next quarter in order to meet earnings targets.
- Accounting Earnings Management, for example:
Change accounting estimates in order to meet earnings targets.
10
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTSNon-Compliant Accounting
• Enron (2001) used special purpose entities to understate debt and overstate profits and cash flow
• WorldCom (2002) capitalized certain expenditures to understate expenses and thus overstate earnings and operating cash flow
• New Century Financial (2007) reserved minimal amounts for loan repurchase losses for subprime mortgages.
11
QUALITY SPECTRUM OF FINANCIAL REPORTSFictitious Transactions
• Equity Funding Corp. (1970s) created fictitious revenues and even fictitious policy holders.
• Crazy Eddie’s (1980s) reported fictitious inventory as well as fictitious revenues supported by fake invoices.
• Parmalat (2004) reported fictitious bank balances.
12
MOTIVATIONS POTENTIALLY ASSOCIATED WITH LOW FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY
• Mask poor performance (e.g., declining profitability or lower profitability than competitors)
• Meet or beat market expectations (e.g., analysts’ forecasts and/or management’s guidance)- Increase stock price, if only temporarily- Increase credibility with market participants
• Increase compensation that is linked to reported earnings• Avoid violation of debt covenants
13
CONDITIONS CONDUCIVE TO ISSUING LOW-QUALITY FINANCIAL REPORTS
Opportunity
Motivation
Rationalization
14
MECHANISMS THAT DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY
Regulatory Authority
Auditors
Private Contracting
15
MECHANISMS THAT DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY
Regulatory Authority
Auditors
Private Contracting
16
MECHANISMS THAT DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY
Regulatory Authority
Auditors
Private Contracting
17
MECHANISMS THAT DISCIPLINE FINANCIAL REPORTING QUALITY – POTENTIAL LIMITATIONS
Regulatory Authority
Auditors
Private Contracting
1. Info provided by company
2. Opinion based on sampling
3. Expectations gap
4. Company pays audit fees
18
COMPANIES’ PRESENTATION CHOICES• What information to present—beyond required disclosures?
- Operating metrics (“eyeballs,” clicks, users)- Pro forma measures (a.k.a. Non-GAAP or non-IFRS measures)
• How to present the information?- Emphasize the positive aspects of performance- Include “boilerplate” and excessive or irrelevant detail
19
PRESENTATION CHOICES: GROUPON’S NON-GAAP METRIC
Originally Shown (June S-1 filing)
After SEC’s Review (November S-1 filing)
20
ACCOUNTING CHOICESChoices exist among accounting methods and estimates, including the following:• Revenue recognition
- Timing- Amounts
• Expense recognition- Inventory cost flow- Capitalizing versus expensing- Depreciation method and estimates- Allowances for realization of assets
21
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
• Trade-offs exist, and investors should be aware of how accounting choices affect financial reports.
• FIFO (first-in-first-out) cost assumption: - More current costs are included in ending inventory on the balance sheet.- Older costs are included in cost of sales on the income statement.
• Weighted-average cost assumption: - A blend of old and new costs in inventory on the balance sheet—not as
current as with FIFO. - A blend of old and new costs in cost of sales on the income statement—more
current than with FIFO.
22
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
Units Cost per Unit Total CostPurchase 1 5 $100 $500 Purchase 2 5 150 750Purchase 3 5 180 900Purchase 4 5 200 1,000Purchase 5 5 240 1,200Cost of goods available for sale $4,350
A company starts operations with no inventory at the beginning of a fiscal year and makes five purchases of goods for resale, as shown in the table. During the period, the company sells all of the goods purchased except for five units.
What are the ending inventory and cost of goods sold if the company uses the FIFO method of inventory costing?
23
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
Units Cost per Unit Total CostPurchase 1 5 $100 $500 Purchase 2 5 150 750Purchase 3 5 180 900Purchase 4 5 200 1,000Purchase 5 5 240 1,200Cost of goods available for sale $4,350
A company starts operations with no inventory at the beginning of a fiscal year and makes five purchases of goods for resale, as shown in the table. During the period, the company sells all of the goods purchased except for five units.
What are the ending inventory and cost of goods sold if the company uses the FIFO method of inventory costing?
First costs in are first costs out to cost of goods sold: $3,150
Last in are in ending inventory $1,200
24
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
Units Cost per Unit Total CostPurchase 1 5 $100 $500 Purchase 2 5 150 750Purchase 3 5 180 900Purchase 4 5 200 1,000Purchase 5 5 240 1,200Cost of goods available for sale $4,350
A company starts operations with no inventory at the beginning of a fiscal year and makes five purchases of goods for resale, as shown in the table. During the period, the company sells all of the goods purchased except for five units.
What are the ending inventory and cost of goods sold if the company uses the FIFO method of inventory costing?
First costs in are first costs out to cost of goods sold: $3,150
Last in are in ending inventory: $1,200
25
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
Units Cost per Unit Total CostPurchase 1 5 $100 $500 Purchase 2 5 150 750Purchase 3 5 180 900Purchase 4 5 200 1,000Purchase 5 5 240 1,200Cost of goods available for sale $4,350
A company starts operations with no inventory at the beginning of a fiscal year and makes five purchases of goods for resale, as shown in the table. During the period, the company sells all of the goods purchased except for five units.
What are the ending inventory and cost of goods sold if the company uses the weighted-average method of inventory costing?
26
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
Units Cost per Unit Total CostPurchase 1 5 $100 $500 Purchase 2 5 150 750Purchase 3 5 180 900Purchase 4 5 200 1,000Purchase 5 5 240 1,200
25Cost of goods available for sale $4,350
A company starts operations with no inventory at the beginning of a fiscal year and makes five purchases of goods for resale, as shown in the table. During the period, the company sells all of the goods purchased except for five units.
What are the ending inventory and cost of goods sold if the company uses the weighted-average method of inventory costing?
Average cost per unit = $4,350/25 units = $174
Ending inventory = 5 × $174 = $870
Cost of goods sold = 20 × $174 = $3,480
27
ACCOUNTING CHOICES:INVENTORY COST FLOW ASSUMPTIONS
28
ACCOUNTING CHOICES: CAPITALIZING VS. EXPENSING AN EXPENDITURE
I. Use the same interest expense/capitalization proportions to allocate the interest payments between operating and investing activities
Operating $18,000
Investing $9,000
II.Offset the entire $3,000 of non-cash discount amortization against the $20,000 treated as expense and included in operating cash flow
Operating $17,000
Investing $10,000
III.Offset the entire $3,000 of non-cash discount amortization against the $10,000 capitalized and included in financing cash flow
Operating $20,000
Investing $7,000
Capitalizing versus expensing affects cash flows as well as earnings and the balance sheet. Assume a company incurs total interest cost of $30,000, composed of $3,000 discount amortization and $27,000 interest payments. Of the total, $20,000 is expensed and the remaining $10,000 is capitalized as plant assets. The following cash flow classification alternatives for the $27,000 exist:
29
ACCOUNTING CHOICES: CASH FLOW CLASSIFICATION
• Presentation choices permitted in IAS 7, “Statement of Cash Flows,” offer flexibility in classification of certain items on the cash flow statement that is not available under US GAAP.
• This flexibility can significantly change the results in the operating section of the cash flow statement.
• IAS 7, Paragraphs 33: “Interest paid and interest and dividends received are usually classified as operating cash flows for a financial institution. However, there is no consensus on the classification of these cash flows for other entities. Interest paid and interest and dividends received may be classified as operating cash flows because they enter into the determination of profit or loss. Alternatively, interest paid and interest and dividends received may be classified as financing cash flows and investing cash flows respectively, because they are costs of obtaining financial resources or returns on investments. [Emphasis added.]
• IAS 7, Paragraph 34: “Dividends paid may be classified as a financing cash flow because they are a cost of obtaining financial resources. Alternatively, dividends paid may be classified as a component of cash flows from operating activities in order to assist users to determine the ability of an entity to pay dividends out of operating cash flows. [Emphasis added.]
30
SUMMARY OF ANALYSTS’ CONSIDERATIONS: REVENUE RECOGNITION
• Timing of revenue recognition• Multiple deliverables• Allowances for sales returns• Days sales outstanding• Rebates
31
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO DETECT WARNING SIGNS: REVENUE RECOGNITION
Examine the accounting policies note for a company’s revenue recognition policies.• Consider whether the policies make it easier to prematurely recognize revenue
- Recognizing revenue immediately upon shipment of goods - Bill-and-hold arrangements
• Consider estimates and judgments required by the policies- Barter transactions can be difficult to value properly- Rebate programs involve many estimates- Multiple-deliverable arrangements require allocation of revenue and timing of
revenue recognition for each item or service
32
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO DETECT WARNING SIGNS: REVENUE RECOGNITION (CONTINUED)
Look at revenue relationships.• Compare a company’s revenue growth with its primary competitors or its
industry peer group and understand the reasons for major differences- Superior management or products and services? - Revenue quality?
• Compare accounts receivable with revenues- Examine the trend in receivables as a percentage of total revenues. - Examine the trend in receivables turnover for unusual changes and seek an
explanation if they exist.- Compare a company’s days sales outstanding (DSO) or receivables turnover
with that of relevant competitors or an industry peer group. • Examine asset turnover
33
SUMMARY OF ANALYSTS’ CONSIDERATIONS: INVENTORY METHODS
• Method compared with competitors• Reserves for obsolescence• LIFO liquidation
34
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO DETECT WARNING SIGNS: INVENTORY
Look at inventory relationships.• Compare a company’s inventory growth—relative to sales growth—with its
primary competitors or its industry peer group and understand the reasons for major differences
• Examine trend in inventory turnover- Poor inventory management?- Obsolescence? Future write-offs?- Overstated current gross and net profits?
• If company uses LIFO (allowed under US GAAP), note whether LIFO liquidations occurred
35
SUMMARY OF ANALYSTS’ CONSIDERATIONS: LONG-LIVED ASSETS
• Estimated life spans compared with others in the same industry• Changes in depreciable lives • Asset write-downs• Policies compared with competitors• Capitalization
36
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO DETECT WARNING SIGNS: LONG-LIVED ASSETS
• Examine the company’s accounting policy note for its capitalization policy for long-term assets, including interest costs, and for its handling of other deferred costs.
• Compare the company’s policy with industry practice.• If the company’s policy is an outlier, cross-check asset turnover and profitability
margins with others in the industry.
37
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO DETECT WARNING SIGNS: OPERATING CASH FLOW VS. NET INCOME
• Pay attention to the relationship of cash flow and net income. • If net income is consistently higher than operating cash flow, it can signal
accrual accounting policies that shift revenue to current period and/or current expenses to later periods.
• Construct a time series of cash generated by operations divided by net income. If the ratio is consistently below 1.0 or has declined repeatedly, there may be problems in the company’s accrual accounts.
38
ALLOWANCE FOR BAD DEBT
“. . . Generally, UAP’s policy required that accounts which were past due between 90 days and one year should be reserved at 50%, and accounts over one year past due were to be reserved at 100%.. . . In FY 1999 and continuing through FY 2000, UAP had substantial bad debt problems. In FY 2000, certain former UAP senior executives were informed that UAP needed to record an additional $50 million of bad debt expense. . . .just prior to the end of UAP’s FY 2000, the former UAP COO (chief operating officer), in the presence of other UAP employees, ordered that UAP’s bad debt reserve be reduced by $7 million in order to assist the Company in meeting its PBT target for the fiscal year. . . At the end of FY 2000, former UAP senior executives reported financial results to ConAgra which they knew, or were reckless in not knowing, overstated UAP’s income before income taxes because UAP had failed to record sufficient bad debt expense.”
SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release
39
VALUATION RESERVE FOR DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
“PowerLinx improperly recorded on its fiscal year 2000 balance sheet a deferred tax asset of $1,439,322 without any valuation allowance. The tax asset was material, representing almost forty percent of PowerLinx’s total assets of $3,841,944. PowerLinx also recorded deferred tax assets of $180,613, $72,907, and $44,921, respectively, in its financial statements for the first three quarters of 2000.“PowerLinx did not have a proper basis for recording the deferred tax assets. The company had accumulated significant losses in 2000 and had no historical operating basis from which to conclude that it would be profitable in future years. Underwater camera sales had declined significantly and the company had devoted most of its resources to developing its SecureView product. The sole basis for PowerLinx’s “expectation” of future profitability was the purported $9 million backlog of SecureView orders, which management assumed would generate taxable income; however, this purported backlog. . . did not reflect actual demand for SecureView cameras and, consequently, was not a reasonable or reliable indicator of future profitability.”
SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release
40
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES TO DETECT WARNING SIGNS: ALLOWANCES
Examine allowances for which estimates can impact earnings, for example:• Accounts Receivable – Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
- Examine changes in allowances as a percentage of the asset account.- Collection experience.
• Tax Asset Valuation Accounts- Assess reasonableness of level.- Examine changes in the valuation account. - Compare allowance level with information in the management commentary.- Compare allowance level with information in the tax note.
41
OTHER POTENTIAL WARNING SIGNS:AREAS THAT MIGHT SUGGEST FURTHER ANALYSIS
• Depreciation methods and useful lives compared with those of its peers • Fourth-quarter surprises routinely occurring• Presence of related-party transactions• Non-operating income or one-time sales included in revenue• Classification of expenses as “non-recurring” • Gross/operating margins out of line with competitors or industry, an ambivalent
signal.
42
IMPORTANCE OF CONTEXT IN JUDGING WARNING SIGNS
• Companies with an unblemished record of meeting growth projections (especially younger companies)
• Minimalist approach to disclosure—for example, highly aggregated segment reporting
• Fixation on reported earnings—for example, the use of aggressive non-GAAP metrics or frequent special items
• Restructuring and/or impairment charges• Merger and acquisition activity, including allocation of purchase price in an
acquisition
43
SUMMARY• Financial reporting quality can be thought of as spanning a continuum.• Reporting quality pertains to the information disclosed whereas results quality
(commonly referred to as earnings quality) pertains to the earnings and cash generated by the company’s actual economic activities.
• Motivations to issue lower-quality financial reports include masking poor performance, boosting the stock price, increasing personal compensation, and/or avoiding violation of debt covenants.
• Mechanisms that discipline financial reporting quality include the free market and incentives for companies to minimize cost of capital, auditors, contract provisions, and enforcement by regulatory entities.
• Examples of accounting choices that affect earnings and balance sheets include revenue recognition, inventory cost flow assumptions, estimates of realizability of assets (such as accounts receivable and deferred tax assets), depreciation method, estimated salvage value, and useful life of depreciable assets.
• Warning signals of potential accounting manipulation should be evaluated cohesively, not on an isolated basis.
top related