chapter 2 international data...2016/12/02 · turkey hong kong iran new zealand brazil columbia...
Post on 22-Aug-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 2
International Data
2�2�
�Interna�onal�comparisons�
where if contributing countries have updated their final numbers subsequent to this publication.
To assist in equitable comparisons the international definition of an organ donor, used by all contributors to IRoDaT, is that of an Actual deceased organ donor is a consented eligible donor from whom at least one organ was recovered for the purpose of trans-plantation (World Health Organisation). This differs slightly to the historical data reported in previous ANZOD reports, whereby the definition used was that of an Actual donor - a person from whom the re-trieval operation is commenced for the purpose of transplantation. This includes donors who may be deemed medically unsuitable at time of surgery or after removal of organs.
Figure 2.1 show the difference to the reported ANZOD numbers when each definition is applied.
Organ donation and transplantation is a world wide practice which extends and enhances the quality of peoples lives suffering from end stage organ failure. Many countries have implemented procedures and sys-tems to address meeting the need for transplantation. This year the Registry has expanded its reporting with greater comparisons of Australia and New Zealand to global activity and comparatively over time.
For the purpose of this comparison, data has been sourced from the International Registry in Organ Dona-tion and Transplantation (hereinafter IRODaT). Data was sourced on October 4, 2013 from the IRODaT website http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php and represents data compiled from broad selection of the 72 world wide contributing countries over the past 4-5 years.
Data reported hereinafter on international donation and transplantation rates may differ to that reported else-
0
5
10
15
20
Per
Mill
ion
Pop
ulat
ion
19981999
20002001
20022003
20042005
20062007
20082009
20102011
2012
Year
Organ Donors (ANZOD)
Organ Donors (International)
Organ DonorsPer Million Population, Australia
Organ Donors Per Million Population by Definition 1998 - 2012
Figure 2.1
2
2�3�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
36.535.1
32.926.326.0
24.324.0
23.523.0
22.522.4
19.919.8
19.018.3
17.016.5
16.115.715.6
15.115.0
14.714.3
13.713.4
12.812.6
12.010.2
8.67.37.26.9
4.54.5
3.43.12.9
0.90.3Bulgaria
JapanRussia
Saudi ArabiaRomania
VenezuelaTurkey
IranHong Kong
IsraelNew Zealand
ColumbiaSwitzerland
BrazilGermanyDenmarkLithuaniaHungaryCanadaSweden
NetherlandsAustralia
ArgentinaPoland
UruguayIreland
United KingdomLatvia
Czech RepublicFinland
ItalyAustria
SloveniaNorway
PortugalEstonia
USAPuerto Rico
BelgiumSpain
Croatia
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
DPMP
2012
Figure 2.2 International Deceased Donor Rates 2012
�
Organ donation and transplantation rates vary across the world and many countries are striving to increase donor numbers. Despite the various programs, there remains unmet demand. Global-ly there is considerable activity and momentum among governmental and professional bodies to improve donation rates.
The usual metric of measuring and comparing international deceased organ donation rates is ‘donors per million population’. Figures 2.2 to 2.6 compares deceased organ donation rates of forty countries contributing data to IRODaT and where Australia and New Zealand is placed comparatively per year for the past 5 years.
Figures 2.7 to 2.26 compare the organ trans-plantation rate per million population per specific organ, retrospectively to 2009.
Data for all countries reported hereinafter has been sourced from the IRODaT website and was compiled on October 4, 2013. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.
International Deceased Organ Donor Rates (Donor Per Million Population)
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013
2�4�
32.030.4
28.725.925.6
25.223.4
21.620.9
20.519.6
17.116.4
15.915.815.7
14.814.514.5
14.013.7
13.313.012.9
12.612.612.5
10.99.79.69.4
8.86.7
4.13.9
3.53.53.43.2
2.90.9Japan
BulgariaRomania
RussiaTurkey
VenezuelaSaudi Arabia
IranHong Kong
IsraelNew Zealand
BrazilIreland
LithuaniaColumbia
SwedenSwitzerland
DenmarkNetherlands
PolandCanada
AustraliaUruguay
ArgentinaLatvia
EstoniaHungary
GermanyUnited Kingdom
FinlandCzech Republic
SloveniaNorway
ItalyAustria
BelgiumUSA
Puerto RicoCroatia
PortugalSpain
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
DPMP
2010
International Deceased Organ Donor Rates (Donor Per Million Population)
Figure 2.3 International Deceased Donor Rates 2010
Figure 2.4
35.335.0
29.328.5
26.025.6
23.523.2
21.920.7
20.319.4
17.917.617.317.0
15.515.415.415.115.114.714.5
13.213.113.112.8
12.211.8
11.010.7
8.65.6
4.74.6
3.83.73.43.3
0.90.6Bulgaria
JapanRussia
Saudi ArabiaRomania
VenezuelaTurkey
Hong KongIran
New ZealandBrazil
ColumbiaIsrael
LithuaniaSwitzerland
HungaryDenmark
NetherlandsPoland
GermanyArgentinaAustraliaCanadaSwedenSlovenia
United KingdomFinland
Czech RepublicLatvia
EstoniaUruguay
IrelandItaly
AustriaPuerto Rico
NorwayUSA
PortugalBelgiumCroatia
Spain
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
DPMP
2011
International Deceased Donor Rates 2011
Interna�onal�comparisons�
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013. Data represents a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete donation data in 2010 and 2011.
This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2
2�5�
34.431.0
26.326.1
25.825.0
24.621.321.1
19.419.1
17.617.4
17.016.3
15.014.914.814.714.5
13.913.913.8
13.313.0
12.512.3
11.311.0
10.09.8
8.77.5
4.23.33.22.92.7
2.01.6
0.8JapanBulgaria
RomaniaRussia
IranVenezuela
Saudi ArabiaTurkey
Hong KongBrazilIsrael
New ZealandPoland
AustraliaColumbiaArgentina
NetherlandsSwitzerland
SwedenHungary
DenmarkCanada
LithuaniaLatvia
GermanyUnited Kingdom
IrelandSlovenia
CroatiaFinland
Czech RepublicUruguayNorway
ItalyEstoniaAustria
BelgiumUSA
Puerto RicoPortugal
Spain
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
DPMP
2009
34.229.0
26.726.2
24.823.1
21.120.5
20.119.5
19.219.1
17.917.3
16.515.2
14.714.714.614.6
13.113.0
12.312.111.811.8
11.29.79.6
7.77.37.2
5.34.5
3.63.3
2.92.92.6
0.90.8Bulgaria
JapanRussia
RomaniaIran
VenezuelaTurkey
Saudi ArabiaHong Kong
BrazilNew Zealand
IsraelColumbiaLithuania
PolandDenmark
SwitzerlandAustralia
NetherlandsLatvia
ArgentinaCanada
GermanyUnited Kingdom
HungaryFinland
SwedenIrelandCroatia
UruguayCzech Republic
SloveniaAustriaNorway
ItalyEstonia
BelgiumUSA
PortugalPuerto Rico
Spain
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
DPMP
2008
International Deceased Organ Donor Rates (Donor Per Million Population)
International Deceased Donor Rates 2009
Figure 2.5 International Deceased Donor Rates 2008
Figure 2.6
Interna�onal�comparisons�
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013. Data represents a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete donation data in 2008 and 2009.
This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2�6�
53.146.346.2
45.743.8
42.838.2
36.735.3
33.230.430.4
29.927.8
27.026.6
25.525.525.125.125.1
24.323.022.8
21.620.920.4
19.517.617.4
16.413.8
10.18.0
7.37.07.07.0
5.61.7
1.1BulgariaJapan
RussiaSaudi Arabia
VenezuelaTurkey
RomaniaHong Kong
IranNew Zealand
IsraelBrazil
ColumbiaPuerto Rico
HungaryArgentinaLithuania
SwitzerlandSlovenia
DenmarkCanada
GermanyNetherlands
AustraliaItaly
SwedenPoland
United KingdomEstonia
Czech RepublicFinland
LatviaUSA
IrelandUruguay
AustriaBelgiumPortugalNorway
SpainCroatia
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
PMP
2011
Interna�onal�comparisons�
53.847.5
43.943.743.6
42.636.4
35.034.734.7
33.431.0
30.229.4
28.728.628.5
27.626.826.7
25.525.3
24.124.124.0
22.220.720.5
19.516.8
12.612.012.0
11.49.18.9
6.95.2
4.41.5
0.6BulgariaJapan
Saudi ArabiaRussiaTurkey
RomaniaIsrael
VenezuelaHong Kong
IranNew Zealand
ColumbiaSwitzerland
BrazilCanada
GermanyPuerto Rico
DenmarkArgentinaLithuaniaSweden
ItalyAustraliaHungary
NetherlandsIrelandPoland
United KingdomUruguaySlovenia
Czech RepublicUSA
FinlandLatvia
PortugalAustria
BelgiumNorwayEstonia
SpainCroatia
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
PMP
2012
International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2012
Figure 2.7 International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2011
Figure 2.8
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.7 and 2.8 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation ac-tivity from deceased donors, per million population, for kidney in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.
International Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
2
2�7�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
56.044.8
41.439.6
39.039.0
35.435.2
32.732.6
30.127.8
26.325.625.5
24.724.724.3
23.222.121.621.521.3
20.820.5
18.518.3
17.313.3
12.412.211.7
6.25.9
5.44.84.64.5
3.81.4
0.0IrelandJapan
RomaniaSaudi Arabia
BulgariaRussia
IranVenezuela
TurkeyNew Zealand
Hong KongIsraelBrazil
Puerto RicoAustralia
ColumbiaPoland
ArgentinaUnited Kingdom
SloveniaCanada
LithuaniaNetherlandsSwitzerland
HungarySweden
ItalyDenmarkGermany
LatviaCzech Republic
FinlandUruguayCroatia
USANorwayAustriaEstonia
BelgiumSpain
Portugal
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
PMP
2009
49.248.9
41.739.6
38.136.9
34.230.730.5
27.827.5
26.426.126.1
24.823.023.023.022.622.522.522.5
21.621.621.1
19.119.0
17.315.6
10.510.4
7.96.26.26.1
5.65.15.1
1.50.0
1IrelandJapanTurkey
BulgariaRomania
RussiaSaudi Arabia
VenezuelaIran
Hong KongNew Zealand
BrazilPuerto Rico
ColumbiaLithuaniaArgentina
SwedenCanada
United KingdomNetherlands
AustraliaSwitzerland
ItalyDenmarkSlovenia
PolandUruguayEstonia
HungaryGermany
LatviaCzech Republic
FinlandUSA
NorwayAustria
BelgiumSpain
Portugal
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0
PMP
2010
International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2010
Figure 2.9 International Transplantation Rates Kidney 2009
Figure 2.10
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.9 and 2.10 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for kidney in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.
International Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
2�8�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
29.822.722.6
20.116.016.0
15.114.914.8
13.512.5
11.410.910.7
10.110.0
9.69.4
8.78.48.48.48.2
6.86.36.3
5.75.55.5
5.35.0
4.64.14.0
3.51.7
1.00.30.3
0.00.0Venezuela
LatviaBulgaria
JapanRussia
Saudi ArabiaTurkey
RomaniaHungary
ColumbiaLithuania
Puerto RicoUruguay
IsraelIran
Hong KongNew Zealand
EstoniaPoland
BrazilNetherlands
DenmarkArgentina
CanadaFinland
United KingdomAustralia
Czech RepublicIreland
GermanySwitzerland
SloveniaAustria
SwedenItalyUSA
PortugalNorway
SpainBelgiumCroatia
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
PMP
2012
28.223.8
23.520.7
19.518.0
15.815.8
15.013.613.6
12.612.2
11.610.4
10.09.9
9.28.9
8.48.28.28.1
7.47.37.3
6.04.5
4.24.24.13.93.8
2.72.5
0.90.50.40.3
0.00.0Venezuela
Puerto RicoJapan
BulgariaLatvia
RussiaRomania
Saudi ArabiaLithuania
TurkeyHungary
Hong KongColumbia
IranEstonia
UruguayBrazil
NetherlandsNew Zealand
ArgentinaAustralia
Czech RepublicIsrael
DenmarkPoland
SloveniaFinland
United KingdomCanada
SwitzerlandIreland
GermanyAustria
SwedenItaly
NorwayUSA
PortugalSpain
BelgiumCroatia
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
PMP
2011
International Liver Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Liver 2012
Figure 2.11 International Transplantation Rates Liver 2011
Figure 2.12
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.11 and 2.12 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for liver in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2
2�9�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
22.820.7
19.619.4
18.218.0
15.815.3
13.213.0
12.511.2
10.09.39.29.19.0
8.37.5
7.06.96.8
6.36.0
5.74.7
4.33.9
3.63.4
2.72.42.32.2
1.70.8
0.20.00.00.0
1Puerto RicoVenezuela
LatviaJapan
RussiaBulgariaEstonia
RomaniaSaudi Arabia
TurkeyIran
UruguayLithuaniaHungary
ColumbiaPoland
Hong KongArgentina
BrazilNew ZealandNetherlands
AustraliaDenmark
IrelandUnited KingdomCzech Republic
FinlandSlovenia
SwitzerlandCanadaSweden
GermanyItaly
AustriaBelgiumNorway
USAPortugal
Spain
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
PMP
2010
22.921.4
19.018.9
17.016.9
16.515.1
14.713.3
12.411.7
11.29.4
9.09.0
8.57.6
7.17.16.96.8
6.36.16.0
5.65.0
4.03.3
3.02.42.22.12.1
1.31.3
0.60.10.00.00.0Puerto Rico
LatviaVenezuela
JapanRussia
BulgariaRomania
Saudi ArabiaLithuania
IranUruguayEstoniaTurkey
HungaryColumbia
PolandArgentina
Hong KongBrazilIsrael
AustraliaNetherlands
DenmarkNew Zealand
United KingdomFinland
SloveniaCzech Republic
CanadaSwitzerland
GermanyCroatia
SwedenIreland
ItalyAustriaNorway
BelgiumPortugal
USASpain
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0
PMP
2009
International Liver Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Liver 2010
Figure 2.13 International Transplantation Rates Liver 2009
Figure 2.14
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.13 and 2.14 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for liver in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2�10�
�Interna�onal�comparisons�
14.010.2
7.67.3
7.06.9
6.45.2
4.84.6
4.44.24.1
3.93.9
3.43.3
3.02.92.82.7
2.42.22.22.22.12.12.1
1.81.5
1.21.00.90.80.8
0.50.30.20.1
VenezuelaEstonia
RomaniaJapan
BulgariaLatvia
Saudi ArabiaTurkeyRussia
IranBrazil
Puerto RicoIsrael
PolandUruguay
ColumbiaUnited Kingdom
IrelandNetherlandsHong Kong
New ZealandArgentina
PortugalLithuaniaHungaryAustraliaCanada
ItalyFinland
GermanySwitzerland
DenmarkSweden
SpainNorway
Czech RepublicBelgium
AustriaUSA
CroatiaSlovenia
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2012
8.97.4
7.06.9
6.56.1
5.95.4
5.25.0
4.64.54.54.54.4
3.33.03.0
2.72.62.6
2.42.4
2.11.8
1.61.51.41.41.31.31.3
1.01.0
0.80.8
0.30.30.2
VenezuelaEstonia
JapanBulgaria
RomaniaBrazil
RussiaSaudi Arabia
IranTurkey
Hong KongIrelandLatvia
HungaryPuerto Rico
LithuaniaColumbia
PolandUnited Kingdom
UruguayArgentina
NetherlandsNew Zealand
AustraliaIsrael
FinlandPortugal
GermanySwitzerland
CanadaItaly
SpainDenmarkSwedenNorwayAustria
Czech RepublicBelgiumSlovenia
USACroatia
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2011
International Heart Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Heart 2012
Figure 2.15 International Transplantation Rates Heart 2011
Figure 2.16
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.15 and 2.16 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for heart in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2
2�11�
�Interna�onal�comparisons�
9.08.6
7.67.3
6.16.05.95.9
5.65.04.9
4.54.44.4
3.92.7
2.52.52.42.42.3
2.12.12.12.02.01.91.9
1.41.3
1.10.80.70.60.6
0.40.30.3
0.1
VenezuelaEstonia
JapanRomania
RussiaLatvia
Saudi ArabiaIran
BulgariaTurkeyBrazil
ColumbiaHong Kong
PolandIreland
Puerto RicoUnited Kingdom
NetherlandsUruguay
LithuaniaIsrael
HungaryFinland
ArgentinaNew Zealand
AustraliaSwitzerland
PortugalGermany
CroatiaDenmark
CanadaNorway
SwedenSpain
ItalyBelgium
USACzech Republic
AustriaSlovenia
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2009
International Heart Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
Figure 2.17 International Transplantation Rates Heart 2009
8.28.1
7.57.0
6.66.16.1
5.95.2
4.94.84.7
4.54.5
4.13.9
3.02.9
2.72.5
2.12.12.01.91.81.8
1.51.3
1.11.00.90.80.70.7
0.30.20.2
VenezuelaLatvia
Estonia4
IrelandJapan
RomaniaRussia
BulgariaSaudi Arabia
BrazilIran
TurkeyColumbia
Puerto RicoUnited Kingdom
ArgentinaHong Kong
HungaryPoland
UruguayNew ZealandNetherlands
AustraliaLithuaniaDenmark
FinlandItaly
SwitzerlandPortugal
GermanyCanada
SpainSwedenBelgiumNorway
Czech RepublicSlovenia
USACroatiaAustria
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2010
International Transplantation Rates Heart 2010
Figure 2.18
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.17 and 2.18 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for heart in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not rep-resent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2�12�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
14.911.7
6.56.5
6.35.65.6
5.35.05.04.94.8
4.44.4
3.23.1
2.92.4
1.91.9
1.71.3
1.00.8
0.50.40.40.30.30.3
0.10.0
VenezuelaSloveniaRomania
Puerto RicoLatvia
HungaryHong Kong
CroatiaBulgaria
RussiaIran
JapanColumbia
TurkeyBrazil
PolandSaudi Arabia
ArgentinaLithuaniaPortugalEstonia
Czech RepublicItaly
UruguayUnited Kingdom
IrelandNew Zealand
GermanyCanada
NetherlandsIsrael
FinlandSpain
DenmarkUSA
NorwaySweden
AustraliaSwitzerland
BelgiumAustria
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2012
14.310.6
7.87.1
6.86.3
5.85.7
5.45.2
4.94.3
4.14.1
3.13.02.9
2.01.81.71.7
1.00.60.60.5
0.30.30.30.20.10.10.1
VenezuelaSloveniaRomania
Puerto RicoLatvia
HungaryHong Kong
CroatiaBulgaria
RussiaTurkey
ColumbiaIran
JapanBrazil
LithuaniaPoland
UruguayArgentina
Saudi ArabiaPortugal
Czech RepublicIreland
ItalyNew Zealand
EstoniaUnited Kingdom
NetherlandsGermany
FinlandSpain
CanadaDenmark
NorwayUSA
SwedenSwitzerland
AustraliaIsrael
BelgiumAustria
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2011
International Lung Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Lung 2012
Figure 2.19 International Transplantation Rates Lung 2011
Figure 2.20
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.19 and 2.20 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for lung in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2
2�13�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
13.62.2
2.01.6
1.21.0
0.70.70.60.50.50.40.40.30.30.20.20.20.10.10.10.1
VenezuelaUruguay
USATurkey
SloveniaRussia
RomaniaPuerto Rico
New ZealandLithuania
LatviaIreland
HungaryHong Kong
FinlandEstoniaCroatia
Bulgaria19
ColumbiaBrazilJapan
IranNorway
Saudi ArabiaPoland
NetherlandsSwitzerland
United KingdomAustraliaPortugal
GermanyCzech Republic
ItalyCanada
ArgentinaDenmarkSwedenBelgium
SpainAustria
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2010
6.31.9
1.71.31.21.11.01.00.90.9
0.70.70.60.50.50.5
0.20.20.20.20.10.10.00.0
VenezuelaUruguay
USATurkey
SloveniaRomania
Puerto RicoNorway
LithuaniaLatvia
HungaryHong Kong
FinlandEstoniaCroatia
ColumbiaBulgaria
RussiaIran
JapanSwitzerland
Saudi ArabiaNew Zealand
BrazilPoland
AustraliaIreland
GermanyUnited Kingdom
ItalyArgentina
Czech RepublicCanadaPortugalBelgium
AustriaNetherlands
DenmarkSweden
SpainIsrael
0.0 10.0 20.0
PMP
2009
International Lung Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Lung 2010
Figure 2.21 International Transplantation Rates Lung 2009
Figure 2.22
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.21 and 2.22 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for lung in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not repre-sent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2�14�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
5.63.6
3.43.0
2.92.9
2.52.2
2.01.9
1.81.81.8
1.71.71.7
1.51.5
1.31.1
0.90.80.8
0.60.5
0.40.20.20.2
0.10.1
VenezuelaSlovenia
Saudi ArabiaRomaniaLithuania
LatviaHong Kong
EstoniaDenmarkBulgaria
TurkeyColumbia
IrelandRussiaJapan
IranNew Zealand
HungaryUSA
BrazilIsrael
PolandItaly
FinlandUruguayAustralia
ArgentinaAustria
CanadaCroatia
SpainPortugal
GermanyNetherlands
Czech RepublicBelgiumSweden
Puerto RicoUnited Kingdom
SwitzerlandNorway
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
PMP
2012
4.03.8
3.73.2
3.02.9
2.82.42.4
2.12.0
1.91.9
1.81.6
1.51.3
1.21.01.0
0.90.90.90.9
0.60.5
0.40.30.30.2
0.10.10.1
0.1
VenezuelaRomania
LatviaHong Kong
EstoniaDenmarkBulgaria
Saudi ArabiaRussiaFinland
ColumbiaArgentina
JapanIran
TurkeySlovenia
New ZealandPoland
LithuaniaBrazilUSA
HungaryItaly
AustraliaNetherlands
UruguayIsrael
IrelandSwitzerland
AustriaPuerto Rico
GermanyPortugal
SpainCroatia
BelgiumCzech Republic
CanadaSweden
United KingdomNorway
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
PMP
2011
International Pancreas Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2012
Figure 2.23 International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2011
Figure 2.24
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.23 and 2.24 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for pancreas in 2012 and 2011 respectively. This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2
2�15�
Interna�onal�comparisons�
3.73.1
2.82.02.02.0
1.81.5
1.41.4
1.21.1
0.80.70.70.7
0.60.5
0.40.4
0.30.20.2
0.10.10.00.0
VenezuelaRomania
Puerto RicoLithuania
LatviaJapanIreland
HungaryHong Kong
EstoniaDenmarkColumbia
Bulgaria14
PolandAustralia
Saudi ArabiaRussia
IranNew Zealand
FinlandTurkey
Czech RepublicSlovenia
United KingdomBrazil
NetherlandsCanada
ItalyUSA
UruguayCroatia
PortugalArgentina
SwitzerlandGermany
SpainBelgiumSwedenNorwayAustria
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
PMP
2010
4.03.3
2.92.7
2.22.1
1.91.7
1.51.5
1.41.3
1.20.9
0.80.70.7
0.50.30.20.2
0.10.10.10.00.0
VenezuelaSloveniaRomania
PolandNew Zealand
LithuaniaLatviaJapanIreland
HungaryHong Kong
FinlandEstonia
DenmarkBulgaria
ColumbiaAustralia
Saudi ArabiaRussiaAustria
Czech RepublicIran
TurkeyNetherlands
United KingdomCanada
BrazilIsrael
ItalySwitzerland
GermanyUruguay
Puerto RicoArgentina
PortugalSpain
SwedenBelgiumCroatiaNorway
USA
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
PMP
2009
International Pancreas Transplantation from Deceased Donors (Per Million Population)
International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2010
Figure 2.25 International Transplantation Rates Pancreas 2009
Figure 2.26
Data sourced from IRODaT http://www.irodat.org/irodat_all_en.php on October 4, 2013.
Figures 2.25 and 2.26 represent a comparison of the same 41 countries who provided complete transplantation activity from deceased donors, per million population, for pancreas in 2010 and 2009 respectively. This does not represent the ranking of these countries world wide.
2�16�
This�page�is�inten�onally�blank�
top related