chapter 7: corporate strategy team 4: peter hogue, breann flores, cameron lloyd, matthew hord,...

CHAPTER 7: CORPORATE STRATEGY

Team 4: Peter Hogue, Breann Flores, Cameron Lloyd, Matthew Hord, Jonathon Jordan

Corporate Strategy vs. Business Strategy

Business Strategy is concerned with how a firm competes

Corporate Strategy is concerned with where a firm Competes

Range of product/market activities the firm undertakes

Product Scope– How specialized the firm is in terms of the range of products it supplies. E.g. Coca-Cola, Gap, SAP

Vertical Scope– The range of vertically linked activities the firm encompasses. E.g. Exxon, Nike

Geographical Scope– The geographical spread of activities for the firm.

Tesco Bank: from Food to Finance

A New Image

New store formats: Tesco Extra, Tesco Express

The Tesco “Clubcard” Online shopping Tesco Financial Services

Economies of scope

Economies of scale- reduction of the average costs that result from increase in the output of a single product

Economies of scope- is when a resource across multiple activities uses less of that resource than when the activities are performed independently Tangible vs. non tangible resources

Economies of Scope cont.

Brand extension- exploiting a strong brand across additional products

Economies of scope can be exploited by selling or licensing the use of the resource or capability to another company Ex: Pepsi selling and distributing Starbucks

Frappuccino's

Transaction costs

Market mechanism- where individuals and firms, guided by market prices, make independent decisions to buy and sell goods and services

Administrative mechanism- where decisions concerning production and resource allocation are made by higher authorities' figures

• Examples: search costs, cost of negotiating and drawing up a contract, the cost of monitoring the other party’s side of the contract

The scope of the firm: specialization vs. integration

Single integrated- Vertical scope, product scope and geographical scope

Several specialized firms-it has an administrative interface between each vertical level

Diversification

Refers to the expansion of an existing firm into another product line or field of oporation

Two types Horizontal Vertical

Benefits and Costs

Growth

Risk reduction

Value creation Internal creation External creation

When Does Diversification Create Value?

Attractiveness test

Cost-of-entry test

Better-off test

Vertical Integration

Vertical integration refers to a firm’s ownership of vertically related activities

Indicated by the ratio of a firm’s value added to its sales revenue.

Vertical integration can be: Backward: the firm acquires control over

production of its inputs Forward: the firm acquires control of activities

previously undertaken by its customers Full or partial

Benefits and Costs

In the 20th century, vertical integration was viewed as beneficial.

That opinion has changed over the past 25 years Outsourcing enhances flexibility and allows firms to

concentrate on their ‘core competencies’ One benefit is vertical integration results in cost

savings from the physical integration of processes

One cost is that it can restrict a firm’s ability to benefit from scale economies and can reduce flexibility and increase risk.

Technical Economies from the Physical Integration of Processes

Analysis of the benefits of vertical integration has emphasized the technical economies of vertical integration Cost savings that arise from the physical

integration of processes

Transaction Costs in Vertical Exchanges

When a single supplier negotiates with a single buyer, there is no market price It depends on relative bargaining power

Moving from a competitive market to one with individual buyers and sellers in bilateral relationship causes efficiencies of the market system to be lost.

The Incentive Problem

High-Powered incentives: A market interface exists between buyer and

seller, profit incentives ensure the buyer is motivated to secure the best deal & the seller is motivated to be efficient to retain the buyer.

Internal supplier-customer relationships are subject to low-powered incentives

To create stronger incentives, companies can open internal divisions to external competition

Flexibility

May be disadvantageous in responding to new product development that require new combinations of technical capabilities.

When system-wide flexibility is needed, it may allow for speed and coordination in adjusting through the vertical chain.

Compounding Risk

Vertical integration represents a compounding risk because problems at one stage of production threaten all other stages.

GM strike in 1998 24 US assembly plants halted

Designing Vertical Relationships Arms-length and spot contracts involve no

resource commitment beyond the deal Vertical integration involves a substantial

investment Franchises and long term contracts are

formalized by complex written agreements Spot contracts may require little

documentation but are bound by common law Collaborative agreements between buyers

and sellers are informal

Different types of Vertical Relationships

Long term contracts Vendor partnerships Franchising Joint Ventures Agency Agreements

Long-term Contracts

A series of transactions over a period of time and a specify the terms of sales and responsibilities of each party

Franchising

A contractual agreement between the owner of a business system and trademark that permits the franchisee to produce and market the franchisers product or service in a specified area.

Managing Corporate Portfolio When opportunities are presented that

create value through vertical integration or diversification managers have to decide whether or not to pursue the option and if so how to manage this. Portfolio planning helps answer all those question.

GE/McKinsey Matrix

The attractiveness axis combines market size, market growth, market profitability, cyclicality, inflation recovery, and international potential

Business unit competitive advantage axis combines market share, technology, manufacturing, distribution, marketing, and cost

BCG’s Groxth-Share Matrix

Uses industry attractiveness and competitive position to compare the strategic positions of different business

The simplest of the portfolio planner Four quadrants- Question Marks, Dogs,

Cash Cows, and Stars

Ashridge Portfolio Display

Based upon Goold, Campbell and Alexanders parenting framework

Looks not just at the characteristics of a business but the characteristics of its parent company

Looks at styles of management More difficult to use then the other two

types of portfolio planning but is more realistic

Questions?