cid presentation för vinnova 2003-03-28

Post on 27-Jun-2015

2.455 Views

Category:

Economy & Finance

2 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

11

Interactive Learning Environments

Ambjörn Naeve (Senior Researcher)Mikael Nilsson (PhD student)

Matthias Palmér (PhD student)Fredrik Paulsson (PhD student)

Centre for user oriented IT design

http://cid.nada.kth.se/il

11

Overview

● Problem domain & research questions

● PhD projects

● External projects

● Prototypes and demos

● Vision & future directions

● Evaluation & Testbeds

11

Motivation

● Fundamental problems observed in the educational system:– lack of student interest.

– life long teaching instead of life long learning.

– lack of ambition to know why.

– motion away from natural science.

● e-Learning not a solution, but:– enables non-traditional communication forms

– can support global content sharing

– allows the formation of distributed learning communities

11

ILE Problem domain

● Exploring new kinds of e-learning architectures– Designing for global scope and outreach – decentralization and re-

composition of content

– Developing standards for distributed technologies

– Using next-generation web technologies – Semantic Web

– Supporting conceptual information landscapes

– Designing open educational architectures: accessible, learner-centric, non-linear

11

ILE Research questions

● ICT Design for a global learner-centric e-learning infrastructure– How do we handle information overload?

– Can we support reuse of content by using learning objects?

– Can we increase availability through open source and open standards?

● Design of technology to help break learner passivity– Can we support interest-driven learning?

● Effects of learner-centric technologies on educational architectures

– Do we need new knowledge roles?

– Can we support different methodologies?

● Subject focus: Mathematics

11

Global Infrastructures for ICT-enhanced Math.Ed.Mikael Nilsson

● Subject: Mathematics + didactics

● Since Sept. 2001

● Financed by a national research school in mathematics education. Cooperation with SU, math dept.

● Research Questions:– Are there structural effects of introducing open architectures in math.

ed.?

– Can traditional institutions handle demand for flexible learning?

● Methods:– Study results of experimental class-room projects. Examine new

kinds of user needs.

PhD project

11

Exploring and searching in e-learning systemsMatthias Palmér

● Subject: Computer Science

● Since Jan. 2001

● Cooperation with Uppsala Learning Lab

● Research Questions:– How to design interfaces to bridge the gap between human

semantics and machine semantics?

– How to use Semantic Web technology to support human-to-human communication?

● Methods:– Prototypes of visual tools for non-experts. Integrating requirements

from industrial partners.

PhD project

11

Learning Component TechnologyFredrik Paulsson

● Subject: Computer Science

● Since Dec. 2000

● Financed by National Agency for School Development (as partner contribution)

● Research Questions:– Does component based (modularized) technology lead to more

flexible ILE:s and content?

– Is learning technology standards enough to meet the demands of modularized content and ILE:s?

● Methods:– Implementation of prototypes and evaluation of technical- and

pedagogical tests.

PhD project

11

Collaborative Projects

● SCAM (Standardized Content Archive Management)– National Agency for School Development (SUM),

– National Centre for Flexible Learning (CFL),

– Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company (UR),

– Umeå University (IML: Interactive Media and Learning),

– Uppsala University● ILU: Teacher Education

● Uppsala Learning Lab (ULL)

● SHAME (Standardized Hyper-Adaptable Metadata Editor)– UR,

– CFL,

– SUM

11

Collaborative Projects

● VWE (Virtual Workspace Environment)– Umeå University (IML: Interactive Media and Learning),

– SUM

● Public e-Learning Platform – UR,

– SUM,

– CFL,

– Swedish NetUniversity

● UR’s new digital media library (built on SCAM & SHAME)– UR

– Datadoktorn

– Ateles

11

Collaborative Projects (cont.)● Personalized Access to Distributed Learning Resources

(Funded by the Wallenberg Global Learning Network)

– Edutella (KBS/Hannover, DBL/Stanford, UDBL/Uppsala)

– Evaluating Learning Management Systems (Uppsala Learning Lab)

● Personal Learning Portfolios - Folio Thinking (WGLN)– Media Technology programme/KTH

● MathViz– Presently: DSV/KTH, CL/KTH

– Upcoming: Lillehammer College/Norway, Norwegian National Concerts

● Workflow Management– UR

– Lentus

11

Standards

● The only way to make infrastructures work globally

● We work actively within– IEEE (P1484.12: LTSC LOM)

– Dublin Core

– ISO (JTC1 SC36)

– IMS

– CEN/ISSS (EC)

11

Some Publications

● Report to Swedish Net University: A public e-learning platform built on open source and open standards

● Three papers at WBLE 2001

● Two papers at WWW2002. Responses:

“Edutella is the most exciting project in the world”

Shirley Alexander, Uppsala, Nov 2002

[Professor of Learning Technologies, Sydney]

“So when a paper comes out of [ILE at CID] it's wise to sit up and take notice”

Scott Wilson, CETIS, May 2002

[Centre for Educational Technology Interoperability Standards]

11

Prototypes

Learning Content:● Graphing Calculator

– Used to create math content for several experiments in math education

● Projective Drawing Board– Interacting with geometric constructions

● CyberMath– Distributed virtual environment for mathematics exploration

● A Virtual Mathematics Laboratorium– Using our concept browser, Conzilla

11

Prototypes

Archives:●SCAM – the content archive*

– UR (Swedish Educational Broadcasting Company)

– NoTnavet (National Agency for School Development)

– Projects in the classroom (National Agency for School Development)

– CFL (National Centre for Flexible Learning)

– Digital Portfolios

– Our own Mathematics archive

●SHAME – the metadata editor and query form*– Used by Edutella partners

* = ongoing Master's Thesis Projects

11

Prototypes

Infrastructures:●Edutella* – a P2P (peer-to-peer) network on the (machine) Semantic Web

– lets anyone participate in information exchange

– supports composition of information

●The Conceptual Web– Human Semantic Web – enabling advanced information

architectures via a metadata eco-system

●VWE (Virtual Workspace Environment)– Composing learning components to create learning modules

* = ongoing Master's Thesis Projects

11

PrototypesTools & environments:

●Conzilla*– Being integrated with Edutella as navigator and query formulation

tool*

– Being adopted to mobile devices**

– Creating contexts for archived content● Netscape's Open Directory project (dmoz.org)*

●Portfolio + Conzilla + Edutella + ...

=> A flexible learning environment,

– building on our information architecture

– using bleeding-edge technology (P2P, Semantic Web, Web Service technology)

– using emerging learning technology standards (LOM, IMS)

* = ongoing Master's Thesis Projects

11

Vision

A Knowledge Manifold

● is our structured information architecture that supports a number of different strategies for information hiding.

● can be used to design interactive learning environments that support question-based learning. (“knowledge-pull based on interest”)

● can be considered as a patchwork of knowledge, with a number of linked knowledge patches, each with its own knowledge gardener.

● allows the user to ask questions and search for certified live knowledge sources.

11

Vision (cont.)

A Knowledge Manifold

● has access to a distributed archive of resource components.

● allows teachers to compose components and construct personalized learning modules.

● makes use of conceptual modeling in order to support separation between context and content.

● contains a concept browser (Conzilla) that supports these principles and activities.

11

Vision (cont.)

Pedagogical Foundations for a KM:

● Nobody can teach you anything. A good teacher can inspire you to learn.

● Your motivation to learn is based on direct experience of knowledge enthusiasm and positive expectations from live teachers.

● The prerequisites for efficient learning are improved when you take control of your own learning process.

● No ”problematic” questions can be answered in an automated way.

11

Evaluation & Testbeds

● MathViz project at the IT university (GC, SCAM)

● CL-students at KTH (GC, SCAM)

● Folio Thinking at Media Technology (SCAM, Conzilla)

● UR's media pedagogs (Conzilla/SCAM)

● Several partner projects (SCAM, Conzilla, Edutella)

top related