design calibration en (1)

Post on 18-Aug-2015

59 Views

Category:

Design

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20071

Design and Calibration of aDesign and Calibration of a

Dissolution Test EquipmentDissolution Test Equipment

Training Workshop on Dissolution, Training Workshop on Dissolution,

Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability

and Biopharmaceutical Classification System.and Biopharmaceutical Classification System.

Kyiv, Ukraine, June 25 - 27 2007 Kyiv, Ukraine, June 25 - 27 2007

Dr. Sandra Klein, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology, Dr. Sandra Klein, Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology,

Johann Wolfgang Goethe University FrankfurtJohann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20072

Dosage forms to be tested

• immediate release dosage forms

• powders, granules / beads, tablets, capsules

• controlled release dosage forms

• powders, granules / beads, tablets, capsules

• transdermal systems

• implants

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20073

Official Dissolution Monographs

United States Pharmacopeia

• USP XXX (30)

European Pharmacopoeia

• Ph. Eur. 5th Edition, Supplement 5.3

British Pharmacopoeia

• BP 2007

Japanese Pharmacopoeia

• JP XIV (14)• http://jpdb.nihs.go.jp/jp14e/contents.html

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20074

Official dissolution apparatus

USP 30 classification

1. Rotating Basket (Ph.Eur./BP/JP)

2. Paddle (Ph.Eur./BP/JP)

3. Reciprocating Cylinder (Ph.Eur.)

4. Flow Through Cell (Ph.Eur./BP/JP)

5. Paddle Over Disk (Ph.Eur.)

6. Rotating Cylinder (Ph.Eur.)

7. Reciprocating Holder

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20075

Which type of dissolution apparatus ?

Depends on intention

1. Quality control•examining batch homogeneity•examining batch to batch conformity•examining stability

2. Research & Development • examining drug release behavior of preformulations• in vitro simulation of the gastrointestinal passage

3. IVIVC

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20076

Apparatus 1 - Basket

Useful for

• capsules• beads• delayed release / enteric

coated dosage forms• floating dosage forms• surfactants in media

Standard volume

• 900/1000 ml• 1, 2, 4 liter vessels

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20077

Apparatus 1 - Basket

Advantages

• breadth of experience(more than 200 monographs)

• full pH change during the test

• can be easily automated which is important for routine investigations

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20078

Apparatus 1 - Basket

Disadvantages

• disintegration-dissolution interaction

• hydrodynamic „dead zone“

under the basket

degassing is particularly

important

• limited volume

sink conditions for poorly

soluble drugs ?

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/20079

Apparatus 1 - Basket

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200710

Apparatus 2 - Paddle

Useful for

• tablets• capsules• beads• delayed release / enteric

coated dosage forms

Standard volume

• 900/1000 ml

Method of first choice !!!

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200711

Apparatus 2 - Paddle

Advantages

• easy to use

• robust

• can be easily adapted

to apparatus 5

• long experience

• pH change possible

• can be easily automated

which is important for

routine investigations

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200712

Apparatus 2 - Paddle

Disadvantages

• pH/media change is often difficult

• limited volume sink conditions for poorly soluble drugs ?

• hydrodynamics are complex, they vary with site of the dosage

form in the vessel (sticking,floating) and therefore may

significantly affect drug dissolution

• „coning“

• sinkers for floating dosage forms

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200713

Sinker types

JP/ USP / Ph. Eur. 5.3 Sinker

„a small loose piece of nonreactive material such as

not more than a few turns of wire helix may be attached

to dosage units that would otherwise float …“

„…. other validated sinker devices may be used“

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200714

Coning

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200715

Apparatus 2 - Paddle

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200716

Apparatus 3 – Reciprocating cylinder

Useful for

• tablets• beads• controlled release formulations

Standard volume

• 200-250 ml per station

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200717

Apparatus 3 – Reciprocating cylinder

Advantages

• easy to change the pH• pH-profiles• hydrodynamics can be

directly influenced by varying the dip rate

Disadvantages

• small volume (max. 250 ml)• little experience• limited data

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200718

Apparatus 3 – Reciprocating cylinder

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200719

Apparatus 4 – Flow-Through Cell

Useful for

• low solubility drugs• microparticulates• implants• suppositories• controlled release formulations

Variations

• open system• closed system

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200720

Cell types

Tablets 12 mm Tablets 22,6 mm Powders / Granules Implants Suppositories /

Soft gelatine capsules

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200721

Apparatus 4 – Flow-Through Cell

Advantages

• easy to change media pH• pH-profile possible• sink conditions• different modes

a) open systemb) closed system

Disadvantages• Deaeration necessary

• high volumes of media

• labor intensive

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200722

Apparatus 4 – Flow-Through Cell

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200723

Apparatus 5 – Paddle over disk

Useful for

• transdermal patches

Standard volume

• 900 ml

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200724

Apparatus 5 – Paddle over disk

Advantages

• standard equipment (paddle) can be used, only add a stainless steel disk assembly

Disadvantages

• disk assembly restricts patch size

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200725

Apparatus 6 – Rotating cylinder USP apparatus 7 – Reciprocating holder

most probably will be removed from the USP !!!

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200726

Summary

Immediate release dosage forms:

apparatus 1 or 2 (preferably 2)

Controlled release dosage forms:

apparatus 1 or 2 using different media for QC apparatus 3 or 4 for R&D purposes

Beside the selection of an adequate dissolution apparatus, adequate test conditions are crucial for all purposes !

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200727

Qualification of Dissolution Systems

Prednisone

y = 0,0432x - 0,0039

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Concentration [mg/L]

Ab

sorp

tio

n @

242

nm

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200728

Calibration

Why ?

• to confirm suitability of the equipment and proper operation of the apparatus

How ?

• mechanical calibration (verification of physical parameters)• chemical calibration („Apparatus Suitability Test“ – USP)

When ?

• before using new test equipment• after relocation or major maintenance• at regular intervals („every 6 months“)

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200729

Factors that may affect reliability of the test

Proper alignment/geometry of dissolution apparatus

– dimensions of vessels, paddles, baskets, cylinders– height, centering and wobble

Proper conditions during dissolution test

– temperature– agitation speed– degassing– sampling (sampling zone, timing, filtration, dilution) – vibration

Proper validation of analytical method

– specified in USP Chapter <1225>

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200730

Mechanical calibration

• Verification of physical parameters specified in the pharmacopoeia: USP apparatus 1 and 2

Calibration parameter Current USP tolerance Point of measuring

Height 25 + 2 mm paddle/basket bottom

Basket wobble + 1 mm as runout bottom of basket

Rotational speed + 4 % not applicable

Vessel/shaft centering + 2 mm from center line center line

Vessel temperature 37 + 0.5 °C not applicable

Bath levelness level base plate

Shaft/paddle wobble + 1 mm as runout above top of paddle

Paddle/basket dimensions see USP see USP

Vessel dimensions see USP see USP

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200731

Mechanical calibration - Parameters

Height – Vertical Position of the Paddle or Basket

– the vertical position of paddle or basket affects the hydrodynamics condition in the vessel

– each paddle or basket should be individually adjusted to the compendial distance

– in the pharmacopoeia, a distance of 2.5 + 0.2 cm is specified

– different kinds of height gauges can be usedto align or check* this parameter *

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200732

Mechanical calibration - Parameters

Rotational Speed – Stirring Rate

– input variable that affects the hydrodynamics

– changes in the rotational speed result in a changing liquid-solid interface between the solvent and the dosage form

– the rotational speed can be checked by using adigital tachometer*

– the compendia specify a rotational speed tolerance of + 4 %

*

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200733

Mechanical calibration - Parameters

Shaft Wobble – Eccentricity of Stirring Device

– assumed to alter the pattern of fluid movement in both paddle and basket apparatus and therefore may influence the dissolution rate

– can be measured with a micrometer*

– measured is the sum of distance between both sides (180°) of the axis of rotation

*

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200734

Mechanical calibration - Parameters

Centering (Vessel / Shaft)

– the axis of the rotating shaft must coincide at allpoints with the axis of the vessel to within + 1 mm

– “the shaft has to positioned so that is axis is not more than 2^mm at any point from the vertical axis of the vessel and rotates smoothly without significant wobble”

*

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200735

Mechanical calibration

Measurement tools

• all mechanical tools used for

calibration should be certified

to assure their reliability

• the results of mechanical

calibration have to be documented

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200736

Apparatus suitability test (USP)

• if all parts ( apparatus, geometry, test conditions, analytical

method) are within compliance – why perform an apparatus

suitability test?

• the apparatus suitability is to check for parameters that can not be

conveniently measured (vibration, vessel cleanliness, medium

degassing ...) and also to provide an overall check of the system

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200737

Apparatus suitability test (USP)

• first established in 1978

• routine test in most pharmaceutical laboratories

• calibration at regular intervals (every 6 months)

• standard calibrator substances according USP chapter <711>

• only the method(s) to be used have to be calibrated !

• if six units are tested – all have to pass

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200738

Apparatus suitability test (USP)

Standard calibrators according to USP chapter <711>

Apparatus I, II and V:

1. disintegrating type

– USP Prednisone Tablets

2. nondisintegrating type

– USP Salicylic acid Tablets

Apparatus III:

• USP Chlorpheniramine Maleate Extended-Release Tablets

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200739

Information supplied with calibrators

http:/www.usp.org/referenceStandards/useAndstorage/calibrators.html

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200740

Apparatus suitability test (USP)

USP Prednisone Tablets RS – current lot P0E203

(10 mg nominal prednisone content per tablet)

• disintegrating type

• paddle and basket, 50 rpm

• 500 ml deaerated water, 37°C

• quantity of prednisone released after 30 minutes is determined

• specified ranges Lot P0E203: Apparatus 1: 47-82 % Apparatus 2: 37-70 %

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200741

Apparatus suitability test (USP)

USP Salicylic acid Tablets RS – current lot Q0D200

(300 mg nominal salicylic acid content per tablet)

• nondisintegrating type

• paddle and basket, 100 rpm

• 900 ml deaerated phosphate buffer, 37°C

• quantity of salicylic acid, released after 30 minutes is determined

• specified ranges Lot Q0D200: Apparatus 1: 23-30 %Apparatus 2: 17-25 %

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200742

Apparatus suitability test (USP)

Controversies regarding the current test

• the variability in the intrinsic performance of the USP calibrator

tablets is so great that it exceeds the variability in intrinsic

performance of modern test dissolution assemblies

• this variability becomes obvious in both vessel-to-vessel

variability and inter-laboratory variability of results for a given lot

of calibrators

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200743

Calibrator Tablets:

• always check the incoming tablets !• right lot of calibrators ?• are the tablets broken, fused or severely chipped ?• particularly salicylic acid tablets are often subject to sublimation

( dust on the tablets and the inner surface of the container)

• use correct storage conditions !

• take the tablets out of the original

container immediately before test !

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200744

Standard / Standard solution:

• USP Standard used ?

• drying procedure conducted ?

• standard solution prepared on day of test ?

• standard solution filtered in the same manner as sample ?

• amount of alcohol used in the standard < 5% ?

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200745

Vibration

• vibration produces unwanted variation in dissolution data and

mostly results in an increased dissolution rate

• internal vibration may be caused e.g. from frayed drive belts

• external vibration may be caused by e.g. magnetic stirrers,

centrifuges, vacuum pumps, old fridges, nearby construction, ...

• inability to properly measure vibration levels at various points

within an apparatus is the main reason why calibrator tablets were

originally developed

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200746

Vibration effects – case example:

Effect of vibration levels of the dissolution apparatus on the dissolution rate of enteric coated granules of Cefalexin. The vertical dotted line indicates 0.05 m/s2.

Kaniwa N. et al. (1998) Int J Pharm, 175, 119-129

„Low vibration“: < 0.05 m/s2

„High vibration“: > 0.05 m/s2

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200747

Vibration:

• dissolution equipment placed planar ?

• drive chain or belt free of tension and/or dirt ?

• torn parts replaced ?

• correctly functioning gear plates ?

• individual spindles are not surging ?

• bench/table stable ?

• no sources of vibration nearby ?

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200748

Dissolution medium:

• correctly degassed ?

• correct amount used (900/500 ml) ?

• correct amount dosed (weight/volume) ?

• dosing procedure gentle (resaturation/spillage) ?

• buffer correct (pH + 0.05 units, buffer salts, molarity) ?

• correct temperature during test (32°C / 37°C + 0.5°C)?

• evaporation during test negligible ?

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200749

Importance of degassing:

• insufficient degassing may result in decreased dissolution rates of several drugs

• e.g. prednisone tablets but also a range of poorly soluble drugs are very sensitive to the amount of dissolved gases in the dissolution medium

• the degassing procedure should therefore be efficient and reproducible for every test

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200750

Deaeration method USP

• heat the dissolution medium to about 41°C

• vacuum filter through a 0.45-µm-porosity membrane into a flask, stirring with a magnetic stirrer

• continue to draw a vacuum and stir for an additional 5 min

• gently transfer the medium directly into the vessel

• rotating the apparatus 2 shafts to speed equilibration to 37°C is discouraged!!!

• use medium promptly after equilibration

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200751

Alternative deaeration methods

• the USP states that „other validated deaeration techniques for

removal of dissolved gases may be used“

• other techniques include:heatingsonicationvacuumhelium sparging (expensive)

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200752

Sampling

• take each sample at the correct time point

sampling time points (+ 2%)

• use a single glass syringe for each vessel

• sample from the right location within the vessel

between media surface and top of the

paddle blade

n.l.t. 10 mm from vessel wall

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200753

Sampling

• always use a suitable filter check filter adsorption

• check the clearity of the filtered sample

• filter the sample immediately after sampling

• for automated sampling also check the tubings

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200754

Physical conditions of the apparatus

• vessels scrupulously clean ?

• vessel surface smooth and curvature appropriate ?

Apparatus 1

• the conditions of the baskets, particularly of their clips is critical

• check all baskets for corrosion and blocked meshes before using them

• align the air holes to prevent air cushions emerging during the test

Troubleshooting

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200755

Advantages

• high throughput of samples

• minimizes analyst-to-analyst variability in sampling and filtration

• reduces the average costs per analysis

• very promising for QC purposes

(Semi) Automation

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200756

• automated mixing of water and concentrate

• preheating of medium

• deaeration(vacuum and stirring)

• media can be dispenseddirectly into the vessel

Media preparation

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200757

Offline system

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200758

Online system

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200759

On- / Offline system

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200760

HPLC - online system

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200761

• always validate automated methods, including analytical and sampling methods

• validation should be performed using manual analysis, withdrawing samples at the same times and comparing to the automated results:

not highly variable dissolution results: two concurrent

runs

highly variable dissolution results: simultaneous

sampling

• pay attention to automated dilution and filtering processes

Automation

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200762

• FIP Guidelines for dissolution testing of solid oral products.Dissolution Technologies 4:5-14 (1997).

  

• SM Diebold, JB Dressman. Dissolved oxygen as a measure for de- and re-aeration of aqueous media for dissolution testing. Dissolution Technologies 5: 13-16 (1998).

• S Qureshi. Calibration – the USP dissolution apparatus suitability test.Drug Inf. J. 30, 1055-1061 (1996).

• N Kaniwa et al. Collaborative study on the development of a standard for evaluation of vibration levels for dissolution apparatus.Int. J. Pharm. 175: 119-129 (1998).

• VA Gray, CK, Brown, JB Dressman, LJ Leeson. A new general information chapter on dissolution.Pharmacopoeial Forum 27 (6) [Nov.-Dec. 2001]

• W Brown. General information <1092> The dissolution procedure: development and validationPharmacopoeial Forum 30 (1) [Jan.-Feb. 2004]

 Of general interest:

• Dissolution Technologies: http://www.dissolutiontech.com

Suggested reading

Dr. Sandra Klein, 06/200763

Dr. Sandra KleinJohann Wolfgang Goethe University

Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology9 Max von Laue Street

Frankfurt, 60438, Germany

e-mail: Sandra.Klein@em.uni-frankfurt.de

top related