evaluation team progress collaboration grant 252
Post on 12-Jan-2016
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Evaluation Team Progress
Collaboration Grant 252
Standards of Professional Practice. The state adopted Model Core Teaching Standards and Educational Leadership/Administrator Standards define what teachers and administrators should know and be able to do to ensure that every student is ready for college, careers and engaged citizenship in today’s world.
Differentiated (4) Performance Levels. Teacher and administrator performance on the standards of professional practice are measured on four performance levels. ODE will provide districts approved research-based rubrics aligned to the state adopted standards.
Multiple Measures. Multiple sources of data are used to measure teacher and administrator performance on the standards of professional practice. Evaluators look at evidence from three categories: professional practice, professional responsibilities, and student learning and growth.
Evaluation and Professional Growth Cycle. Teachers and administrators are evaluated on a regular cycle of continuous improvement that includes self reflection, goal setting, observations, formative assessment and summative evaluation.
Aligned Professional Learning. Relevant professional learning opportunities to improve professional practice and impact on student learning are aligned to the teacher’s or administrator’s evaluation and his/her need for professional growth.
Senate Bill 290 Requirements
LCSD Professional Growth Cycle
Self Assessment
Goal SettingOct. 15
Observations & Other EvidenceNov. 30
Mid-Year Review
Jan.
Observations & Other EvidenceJan. 31
Summative EvaluationMarch 15
Probationary Teachers: 1 Formal Observation EVERY year and a minimum of 3 Informal Observations EVERY year. Summative/Evidence Conference EVERY year.
Contract Teachers: On Year: A minimum of 4 Informal Observations,
Collection of Evidence, Goal Setting, Summative/Evidence Conference
Off Year: A minimum of 2 Informal Observations, Teacher Collection of Evidence, Goal Setting
Self Assessme
ntSeptemb
er Reflect on Danielson’s
Framework and rate your performance considering strengths and areas for growth.
Goal SettingOct. 15
Review Self-Assessment and write one Professional Growth Goal based on area for growth.
Using student data, write two Student Learning Objectives in S.M.A.R.T. format.
Professional growth activities and support needed to meet your goals.
Student Learning Objective
(SLO)
Student/School Learning Objectives(SLO) are detailed, measurable goals for student academic growth to be achieved in a specific period of time (typically an academic year),based on prior student learning data, and developed collaboratively by educators and their supervisors
Student Learning Objectives
Must be rigorous and meet the S.M.A.R.T. criteria: Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely
Each teacher must establish at least two student learning objectives from at least two of the following three categories OAKs or National Standardized Tests Common national, regional, district developed
measures Classroom or school wide measures
Student Learning Objectives Con’t
Teachers who are responsible for student learning in tested subjects and grades (i.e., ELA and mathematics in grades 3-8, 11) will use state assessments as one measure and will also select one or more additional measures
Teachers in non-tested (state test) subjects and grades will use measures that are valid representations of student learning standards
Self Assessmen
t
Goal Setting
Observations
Mid-Year Review
Observations
Summative
Evaluation
The SLO Process includes a
continuous cycle where teachers
create and implement
teaching and learning strategies and then monitor student progress through ongoing
formative assessment.
Student Learning Objective
(SLO)
Initial Conference
Aligned Professional Learning Opportunities
Mid-Year Review
Post Conference – On Year and Probationary
Observations & Other EvidenceNov. 30
Artifacts Formative Assessments PLC’s Principal Evidence 1 Formal Observation-
Probationary 2 Informal (min.)
Walkthroughs-On Year 1 Informal (min.)
Walkthroughs – Off Year
Mid-Year
ReviewJanuar
y
Review and Reflect on Professional Growth Goal and two SLO’s
Support from Administrator
Principal Evidence Teacher Evidence
Observations & Other EvidenceJan. 31
Artifacts Formative Assessments PLC’s Principal Evidence 1 (min.) Informal
Walkthrough- Off Year 2 (min.) Informal
Walkthroughs – On Year
Summative
Evaluation
Review and consider Self-Assessment
Review Goals from the year.
Reflect on strengths and areas for growth.
Begin generating ideas for new goals.
Overall Performance Rating.
On Year/Off Year:Evidence Submission
On Year: Summative/Evidence Conference – March 15
LCSD Professional Growth Cycle
Self AssessmentSeptember
Goal SettingOct. 15
Observations & Other EvidenceNov. 30
Mid-Year ReviewJanuary
Observations & Other EvidenceJan. 31
Summative EvaluationMarch 15
Beginning in January 21 Administrators/21 Teachers All Buildings Stipend for participating
teachers and administrators January 30th Training SLO’s Pilot includes full cycle, SLO’s, all
reviews, evidence gathering, weighted and matrix models and Aligned Professional Learning
Participating teachers and administrators will document and provide feedback for Evaluation Team’s review in May
The PilotSelf
Assessment
Feb.
Goal Setting
Feb.
Observations & Other EvidenceFeb/March
Mid-Year Review
Beginning of April
Observations & Other EvidenceApril/May
Summative Evaluation
May
Survey Monkey in May Goal setting process Matrix vs. Weighted Model Number of observations Student Learning Objectives Rubrics/Process Aligned Professional Learning Anything else that might improve the
process
Pilot Feedback
APL-Aligned Professional Learning
Weighted Model
Student Learning and Growth Goals (SLOs)
Professional
Practice &
Professional
Responsibilitie
s
Ratings
Unsatisfactory
Basic
Proficient
Distinguish
ed
Unsatisfactory
Unsatisfacto
ry
Unsatisfacto
ry
Unsatisfacto
ry
Unsatisfactory
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Basic
Proficient
Basic
Proficient
Proficient
Proficient
Distinguished
Proficient
Distinguishe
d
Distinguishe
d
Distinguishe
d
Matrix Model
Collaboration Grant ODE Statewide Meeting April 10 Evaluation Team will attend the Train the Trainer
workshop with Jorie Wilson on April 25. The Evaluation Team will make recommendations
for the 2013/14 school year based on feedback from pilot teachers and administrators.
CLS Training/Danielson’s Model Training Week of June 17
Danielson’s Book and Framework will be provided for all licensed staff.
Trainings on Goal Setting and SLO’s fall 2013
Next Steps
top related