extending the inductor operating frequency for optimally...

Post on 31-Jan-2018

219 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Extending the Inductor Operating Frequencyfor Optimally-coupled

Wireless Power Transfer Systems

Fabian L. Cabrera, Renato S. Feitoza and F. Rangel de Sousafabian.l.c@ieee.org, renato.feitoza@grad.ufsc.br, rangel@ieee.org

RFLaboratorio de RadiofrequenciaUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina

IMOC 2015

RF Introduction

Inductive linksI Used to wireless powering IMD (implanted medical devices) and

RFID tags.

I The secondary inductor must be miniaturized.I The primary size constraints are more relaxed.

Slide 2

RF Introduction

Inductive linksI Used to wireless powering IMD (implanted medical devices) and

RFID tags.

I The secondary inductor must be miniaturized.I The primary size constraints are more relaxed.

Slide 2

RF Introduction

Inductive linksI Used to wireless powering IMD (implanted medical devices) and

RFID tags.I The secondary inductor must be miniaturized.

I The primary size constraints are more relaxed.

Slide 2

RF Introduction

Inductive linksI Used to wireless powering IMD (implanted medical devices) and

RFID tags.I The secondary inductor must be miniaturized.I The primary size constraints are more relaxed.

Slide 2

RF Power transfer efficiency

Efficiency must be maximized

=1k2 .

1Q1

.1

Q2. (p + 2 +

1p

) + p + 1︸ ︷︷ ︸

I Coupling factor squaredI First Inductor quality factorI Second Inductor quality factorI Load matching dependence

Slide 3

RF Power transfer efficiency

Efficiency must be maximized

=1k2 .

1Q1

.1

Q2. (p + 2 +

1p

) + p + 1︸ ︷︷ ︸I Coupling factor squared

I First Inductor quality factorI Second Inductor quality factorI Load matching dependence

Slide 3

RF Power transfer efficiency

Efficiency must be maximized

=1k2 .

1Q1

.1

Q2. (p + 2 +

1p

) + p + 1︸ ︷︷ ︸I Coupling factor squaredI First Inductor quality factor

I Second Inductor quality factorI Load matching dependence

Slide 3

RF Power transfer efficiency

Efficiency must be maximized

=1k2 .

1Q1

.1

Q2. (p + 2 +

1p

) + p + 1︸ ︷︷ ︸I Coupling factor squaredI First Inductor quality factorI Second Inductor quality factor

I Load matching dependence

Slide 3

RF Power transfer efficiency

Efficiency must be maximized

=1k2 .

1Q1

.1

Q2. (p + 2 +

1p

) + p + 1︸ ︷︷ ︸I Coupling factor squaredI First Inductor quality factorI Second Inductor quality factorI Load matching dependence

Slide 3

RF Mutual coupling model

k = M/√

L1L2

M = µ

√davg1davg2

π

[(2γ− γ)

K(γ)− 2γ

E(γ)

](1)

γ =

√4davg1davg2

(davg1 + davg2)2 + πd2 , (2)

1 10 10010

−3

10−2

10−1

davg1

[mm]

k

d=5mm

d=15mm

d=25mm

Magnetic coupling factor when davg2 = 4 mm. Slide 4

RF Quality factor model

L

R(f)C

10M 100M 1G

10−1

100

101

f [Hz]

R [

Ω]

Radiation

R ∝ f 4

Skin effect

R ∝ f 0.5

Loss factor

Λ =1Q

=R

2πf L

0.01 0.1 1

0.01

0.1

f [GHz]

Λ

davg1

=4 mm

davg1

=10 mm

davg1

=22 mm

davg1

=4 mm

davg1

=10 mm

davg1

=22 mm

Sim. Model

Slide 5

RF Quality factor model

L

R(f)C

10M 100M 1G

10−1

100

101

f [Hz]

R [

Ω]

Radiation

R ∝ f 4

Skin effect

R ∝ f 0.5

Loss factor

Λ =1Q

=R

2πf L

0.01 0.1 1

0.01

0.1

f [GHz]

Λ

davg1

=4 mm

davg1

=10 mm

davg1

=22 mm

davg1

=4 mm

davg1

=10 mm

davg1

=22 mm

Sim. Model

Slide 5

RF Quality factor model

L

R(f)C

10M 100M 1G

10−1

100

101

f [Hz]

R [

Ω]

Radiation

R ∝ f 4

Skin effect

R ∝ f 0.5

Loss factor

Λ =1Q

=R

2πf L

0.01 0.1 1

0.01

0.1

f [GHz]

Λ

davg1

=4 mm

davg1

=10 mm

davg1

=22 mm

davg1

=4 mm

davg1

=10 mm

davg1

=22 mm

Sim. Model

Slide 5

RF Trade-off

To maximize efficiency:I k must be maximized, this leads to a primary inductor bigger

than the secondary.

I Operating frequency is then limited by the biggest inductor.I Therefore, the smaller inductor does not operate in its optimal

frequency.I We can extend the operating frequency of the link using a

segmented inductor.

Slide 6

RF Trade-off

To maximize efficiency:I k must be maximized, this leads to a primary inductor bigger

than the secondary.I Operating frequency is then limited by the biggest inductor.

I Therefore, the smaller inductor does not operate in its optimalfrequency.

I We can extend the operating frequency of the link using a

segmented inductor.

Slide 6

RF Trade-off

To maximize efficiency:I k must be maximized, this leads to a primary inductor bigger

than the secondary.I Operating frequency is then limited by the biggest inductor.I Therefore, the smaller inductor does not operate in its optimal

frequency.

I We can extend the operating frequency of the link using a

segmented inductor.

Slide 6

RF Trade-off

To maximize efficiency:I k must be maximized, this leads to a primary inductor bigger

than the secondary.I Operating frequency is then limited by the biggest inductor.I Therefore, the smaller inductor does not operate in its optimal

frequency.I We can extend the operating frequency of the link using a

segmented inductor.

Slide 6

RF Segmented inductor

L

RS (f,CS)C

CS

CS =CG + CD

N − 1

CG Gap capacitanceCD Discrete capacitorN Number of segments

0.1 1

−600

−400

−200

0

200

400

600

f [GHz]

X [

Ω]

N = 1

N = 2

N = 4

N = 8

0.1 1

0.1

1

10

f [GHz]

RS [

Ω]

N=1

N=4, CD

= 0.5 pF

N=4, CD

= 2 pF

N=4, CD

= 8 pF

(a) Equivalent reactance when CD=0. (b) Segmented inductor losses.

Slide 7

RF Segmented inductor

L

RS (f,CS)C

CS

CS =CG + CD

N − 1

CG Gap capacitanceCD Discrete capacitorN Number of segments

0.1 1

−600

−400

−200

0

200

400

600

f [GHz]

X [

Ω]

N = 1

N = 2

N = 4

N = 8

0.1 1

0.1

1

10

f [GHz]

RS [

Ω]

N=1

N=4, CD

= 0.5 pF

N=4, CD

= 2 pF

N=4, CD

= 8 pF

(a) Equivalent reactance when CD=0. (b) Segmented inductor losses.

Slide 7

RF Segmented inductor

L

RS (f,CS)C

CS

CS =CG + CD

N − 1

CG Gap capacitanceCD Discrete capacitorN Number of segments

0.1 1

−600

−400

−200

0

200

400

600

f [GHz]

X [

Ω]

N = 1

N = 2

N = 4

N = 8

0.1 1

0.1

1

10

f [GHz]

RS [

Ω]

N=1

N=4, CD

= 0.5 pF

N=4, CD

= 2 pF

N=4, CD

= 8 pF

(a) Equivalent reactance when CD=0. (b) Segmented inductor losses.Slide 7

RF Segmented inductor quality factor

0.1 1

100

200

300

400

f [GHz]

Q1

1

2 0~16 pF

4 1~16 pF

8 2~32 pF

N

CD

0.1 11

2

3

4

5

6

7

x 10

f [GHz]Q

1Q

2

1

2 0~16 pF

4 1~16 pF

8 2~32 pF

N

CD

x104

Slide 8

RF Effect of the capacitor losses

1 10

0.1

1

C [pF]

ES

R [

Ω]

2 GHz

1 GHz

250 MHz

2 GHz

1 GHz

250 MHz

Data Fitted

0.1 1

1

2

3

f [GHz]

Q1Q

2

1

2 0~16 pF

4 1~16 pF

8 2~32 pF

N

CD

x104

(a) Equivalent series resistance for discrete capacitors. (b) Quality factorsproduct accounting the capacitors ESR.

I Performance is no longer improved for higher values of N because ofthe capacitor losses.

Slide 9

RF Implementation

davg2 [mm] davg1 [mm] N CD [pF] d [mm]4 22 4 3 15

Slide 10

RF Experimental results

N CD [pF] ηmax [%] fηmax [MHz]1 – 30 415 Meas. [3]4 3 38 735 Sim.4 1.5 37 990 Sim.4 1.5 30 980 Meas.

[3] Fabian L. Cabrera and F. Rangel de Sousa, “Optimal Design of Energy Efficient

Inductive Links for Powering Implanted Devices,”in BioWireleSS 2014.Slide 11

RF Conclusions

Conclusions:I The operating frequency of an optimally-coupled inductive link

was extended from 415MHz to 980 MHz.

I The extension of the operating frequency was achieved bydividing the primary inductor into four segments.

I The technique presented offers potential improvements on thelink efficienncy, however that improvements are limited by thecapacitor losses.

I The extension of the primary inductor frequency offers flexibilityto the inductive link design.

Slide 12

RF Conclusions

Conclusions:I The operating frequency of an optimally-coupled inductive link

was extended from 415MHz to 980 MHz.I The extension of the operating frequency was achieved by

dividing the primary inductor into four segments.

I The technique presented offers potential improvements on thelink efficienncy, however that improvements are limited by thecapacitor losses.

I The extension of the primary inductor frequency offers flexibilityto the inductive link design.

Slide 12

RF Conclusions

Conclusions:I The operating frequency of an optimally-coupled inductive link

was extended from 415MHz to 980 MHz.I The extension of the operating frequency was achieved by

dividing the primary inductor into four segments.I The technique presented offers potential improvements on the

link efficienncy, however that improvements are limited by thecapacitor losses.

I The extension of the primary inductor frequency offers flexibilityto the inductive link design.

Slide 12

RF Conclusions

Conclusions:I The operating frequency of an optimally-coupled inductive link

was extended from 415MHz to 980 MHz.I The extension of the operating frequency was achieved by

dividing the primary inductor into four segments.I The technique presented offers potential improvements on the

link efficienncy, however that improvements are limited by thecapacitor losses.

I The extension of the primary inductor frequency offers flexibilityto the inductive link design.

Slide 12

top related