following this cover page are scanned images of no ...2017/06/29 · following this cover page are...
Post on 18-Aug-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY :ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
JUN 2 92017COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK E
NYCALIndex No. 190055/11
This Document Relates To:
STANLEY S. BARASCH,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Viking Pump, Inc. (incorrectly sued herein as “ Viking Pump,
Inc., A Unit of IDEX Corporation” ), (hereinafter “ Viking Pump” ), hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs’ complaint against Viking Pump, with prejudice, there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Viking Pump, be and are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: 2017New York, York
uiYyk.
THE LANIER LAW FJAttorneys for Plainti126 East 56th Street, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10022(212) 421-2800
' jy****'
SO ORDERED
PLLCEdward P. Abbot, Esq.
/ HAWKINS PARNELLTHACKSTON & YOUNG LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Viking Pump, Inc.600 Lexington Avenue, 8th FloorNew York, New York 10022-7678(212) 897-9655
GEORi J. SILVERJ.S.C*
11047615v. l
JUS 23*011RECEIVED
JUN 2 62017
PART 10
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ANTHONY SABIN
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 104096/99
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Juistt- 13- , 2017
•Chftlog -tfafeuoon, Esq.SudWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
"7Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, NeW York 10281
SO ORDERED,
GEORGE J. SU./ER JUH 2 3 2017
3118782
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: fVV.6°NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)Index No.: 109428/98
JOHN A. JADUS % 9^OFFICE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Ourw \% . 2017
Cpnrloofclrguaen, Esq.SlCgjcinKlC,Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC225 Liberty Street, 36th FloorNew York, New York 10281
SO ORDERED,
iEORGE J. SILVERSZ3ea***J.S.C, 2 3 2017,
3118782
F I L E DJUN 2 9 2017
COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICENEW YORK
Index No. 115218-03;25647-91
August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler
Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
EDWARD T. PLANTZ,Plaintiffs,
v.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
Dated: New York, New York- WAY7
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor PIaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDEREI
rfcs Hm
GE J. SILVERJ.5.C.
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
JUN 2320».
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
JUN 2.9 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
x
CONSTANCE M. MONTGOMERY, Individually and as Index No. 102789/00;Personal Representative for the Estate of 122185-99;ROBERT MONTGOMERY, 111036-98;
Plaintiffs, 120917-97
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
TtrMTXmizrE nAni TPf8U§ar\ DennisLVega, Esq. ^Frank M. Ortiz, Esq(
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED;
l, p-c. /Dennis LVega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNjswark, NJ 07102
GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C.
JUN 2 3 2011
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
x
JUN 2 97017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
DEBORAH E. MAKOVITCH, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of THOMAS S. FESHOH and DEANNE M.WHITE, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofSUSAN FESHOH,
Plaintiffs,v.
Index No. 110744/06
February 2012 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts.
Dated: New York, New YorkT- fr -77
•Ffatrk M, Oi Liz, Esq.^Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NYggJg)03^
K5SO ORDERED
ft^6UASOt\ Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Q Tanenbaum Keale LLP
Attorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.
tOne Newark Center, 16th Floorewark, NJ 07102
GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C.
M 2 3201783250869vl
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 2 9 2017
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
EDWARD T. PLANTZ,
Plaintiffs,v.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et aL, includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
Index No. 115218-03;25647-91
August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York.5V/-Y7
-toft rOrtizTBq -tffulri $ ftftfUSOfxWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,.
Newark, N.
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
GEORGE J. SILVER JUN 232017,J.S.C.
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW VORK JUN % 9 2017COUNTY OF NEW YORK
x COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEIN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NEW YORK
X
EILEEN HOULIHAN,Individually and as Proposed Index No. 108356-02Executrix for the Estate of ROBERT E. HOI/LIHAN,SR.,
August 2011FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
Deceased
Plaintiffs,v.
A.C. & S, INC., etal.,Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in theabove-entitled case,pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs7
complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED,that upon notice to alt co-defendants,all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
5-y-/7
toftk-M.Ortiz,EsqCfWeitz & Luxenberg,P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York,NY 10003
FcrJJSon Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATION1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED,
83250869vl
\U
GEORGE J.SILVER SSTiaagfc
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 2 9 2017
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKx
EILEEN HOULIHAN, Individually and as Proposed Index No. 108356-02Executrix for the Estate of ROBERT E. HOgLIHAN, SR.,Deceased August 2011 FIFO Cluster
Plaintiffs, Weitz & Luxenberg
A.C. & S, INC., et al.,Defendants.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, f/k/a Viacom Inc.,successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WestinghouseElectric Corporation (hereinafter "CBS CORPRATION") hereby request summary judgment in theabove-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaint against defendant CBS CORPORATION with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant CBS CORPORATION be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York5-y-/7
frank MrOrtit, Esq.(Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
83250869v1
fcrj»lson Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for CBS CORPORATION1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C.
JON 2
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x
F I L E DJUN 2 9 2017
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONx COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORKCONSTANCE M. MONTGOMERY, Individually and asPersonal Representative for the Estate ofROBERT MONTGOMERY,
Plaintiffs,
Index No. 102789/00;122185-99;111036-98;120917-97
v.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al., includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
Defendants.
August 2010 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster WheelerCorporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CivilPractice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendantFOSTER WHEELER LLC with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Frank M. Ortiz, EsqWeitz & LuxenbergAttorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
ChMisfcrfyKnS, P.C. /
• .
<0-1^—Dennis tTViega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloorNewark, NJ 07102
SO ORDERED
GEORGE J. SILVERJ.S.C. M 2 3 2017.
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 2 9 2017
X
IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKx
DEBORAH E. MAKOVITCH, as Personal Representativefor the Estate of THOMAS S. FESHOH and DEANNE M.WHITE, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofSUSAN FESHOH,
Index No. 110744/06
February 2012 FIFO ClusterWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.
Plaintiffs,v. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„includingFOSTER WHEELER LLC,
WHEREFORE, defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC sued herein as "Foster Wheeler
Corporation" hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant FOSTER
WHEELER LLC with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants,all claims and cross claims against
defendant FOSTER WHEELER LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.Dated: New York, New York'T- &-/7
Dennis E. Vega, Esq.Tanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for Foster Wheeler LLC4085 Raymond Blvd.
/vark Center, 16th Floor
Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 Broadway
:,NJ 07102
GEORGE J. SILVERJ.s.c.
83250869v1JUM 2 3 2011
X:cases\KMA40058\dismissals\nosjmSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
ANTHONY POLITANO,
-against-
A.C & S. INC. et ai.
Plaintiff(s)
Defendants,
Index No.: 106583/00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant, JOHN CRANE INC., hereby request summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, JOHN CRANE INC., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
Ordered, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, JOHN CRANE INC., be and the same hanby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs. ^ ®
.McTiemar/& Moore. 6rneysfor JOHN CRANE INC,
f Rector Street, 14th FloorNefr York, NY 10006
. Esq.Jo C. Dearie & AssociatesAttorney for the Plaintiff515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1118New York, NY 100
SO ORDERED,
GE GE J:SILVERto 2 9 2017
&& ,
^ y.0G
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION I.A.S. Part 50 ' / J
(Moulton, J.) ^0THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
JOHN M. WARD
X
1F&
Index No. 190261/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
x
WHEREFORE, Defendant Kewaunee Scientific Corporation hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Kewaunee Scientific Corporation withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant Kewaunee Scientific Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(p jt.<r , 2017
Chris Romanelli, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)John Ward700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
m/ w-
GE GEJ. .SILVER
David H. Jones, Esa^MALABY & BRADLEY, LLCAttorneys for DefendantKewaunee Scientific Corporation150 Broadway, Suite 600New York, New York 10038(212) 791-0285
'fife:
{00058201.}
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Hon. Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 190116/2008
JOHN R. DRAPER and GENEVIEVE DRAPER,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: Wo/J <2 k / <£017
Harrison, New York
[suzann£ Rjptcliffe, Esq.IWEITZ &/LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorney# for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
S DERED:
GEORGE X SILVER
JUN 2 9 2017
Russell S. Jamison, Esc/MARIN GOODMAN, /LLp.Attorneys for Defendant i
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
f \ \-£° RECEIVEDC0<^
0fp\c£ JUN 2 8 2017
PART 10
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION-X
-X Index No.: 190237-11WILLIAM T. CRUGER and ALEXIS CRUGER,
-against-Plaintiffs,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al. I.A.S. Part 30Hon. Peter H. Moulton
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, Defendant COMPUDYNE CORPORATION, Individually, and as
Successor to York Shipley, Inc. (hereinafter “ COMPUDYNE CORPORATION” ), hereby requests
Summary Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections
3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant COMPUDYNE CORPORATION, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, COMPUDYNE CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk
of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate
counterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all
purposes of this motion.
Dated: "fUno ^ } 2016New Yofk, New York
Matthew McIntyre, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENAttorneys for Plainly700 BroadwayNew York, New Yor(212) 558-5500
Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDG]
SINGER & MAHONEYj
SO ORDERED,
JUN 2 9 2017
X:/DUN5S322.AeeaVNOSJMFEBRUARY 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PEDRO FRANCESCHI,
Plaintiffs),NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
- against - Index No.:103959/04
A.C.&S. INC., etal.;Defendants.
NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
xWHEREFORE, defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/a DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP.
hereby request summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and
Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL
f/k/a DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/a DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP. , be and the same are
hereby d&nisfeed tvitii prdudice and without costs,
/ / 11-Bormtfc'Sidfa'rfdfAifo *3CX&A.V\ * Suzfarthe Halbardier, Esq.Attorney f< rPMMffs Attdfneys for ECR INTERNATIONAL f/k/aBelluck \gt/ DUNKIRK RADIATOR CORP.546 Finfc'A venue Barry McTieman & MooreNew York,|New York 10036 2 Rector Street, 14th Floor
New York, New York 10006# (212)^13-3600
SC^R^tEi
GEORGE J. SILVERM 29 201?
OFFICERECEIVED
PART ^
'th.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
GEORGE A. PAINTER and BETTY G. PAINTER,-X
40-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al„
Defeat^ -X
Index No.: 190344/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company hereby requests Summary Judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Defendant A.W. Chesterton Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against Defendant,
A.W. Chesterton Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs to
either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk of the Court. This No
Opposition Su/rfijnary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate counterparts and facsimile or PDF
signatures shallfceileeped to be original signatures for all purposes of this motion.
Dated: 2017N York
Jordan Fok, msjjtlBELLUCKMFOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED,
NisftiaS. Lakham/Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & PHONEYAttorneys for DefendantA.W. Chesterton Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
ew Y ew York 10022
ORGE J. SILVER
AIN ?S 2m p/28 -
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK __
Index No.: 109983/08In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NORMA SAEVA, as Executrix of the Estate ofJOSEPH SAEVA, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTPlaintiffs), MOTION
- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to either party.
Datedu /M AJ/ V?7 , 2017|\Te\v|/ork, New York
Jordan ClBE LLUGtt &M)X, LLPAtt )rneysItor^Plaintiff546\Emh Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED,
^/ 4JUh!
£o*>20»
ORGE J. SILVER
eat]SEGAL McCAMBRroeESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022212^4-7500
Esq
RECEIVEDJUN 2 8 2017
' /I r"l : •
•- f ' 'ts
I'JBS 79 201?
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 100406/08In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NANCY ROURKE, Executrix of the Estate ofHUGH MCMUNN and DOROTHY MCMUNN,Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
Plaintiffs),
- against -I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
tn pithpr nnrtv
546 Fifth /yvejiue, 4thNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575 '
Weil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10022(212) 651^500 n rRECEIVED
* SO ORDERED, JUN 282017JUN 2 9 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 111711/04In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
MARY M. KING, As Fiduciary of the Estate ofJOHN J. KING and MARY M. KING,Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
Plaintiffs),
- against -I.A.S. Part 50Hon. Peter H. Moulton \
AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs
to eithe
Attome546 FifNew York, NY 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated:
JordanBELLI SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue. Suite 1100
SO ORDEREE
JUN 2 3 2017
1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This Document Relates To:x
GLORIA F. CASSANO, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of RICHARD M. CASSANO,deceased,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
Plaintiffs), INDEX No.: 190234/2011
i
84 LUMBER COMPANY, et al.Defendants).— x
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD MOTOR COMPANY be ^9^the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: NewY New ork
%v. &CL 201 a*
LP
10036
By: lordsBELLUCi546 5thNew Yorl212-681-1'Counsel for: Plaintiffs
SO ORDERED:
By: Adam L. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
t
GEORGE J. S1LVFPJUN 2 9 2017 :1
s.
RECEIVEDJUN 2 8 2017
10{01781948.DOCX }
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
This Document Relates To:x
ELIZABETH J. COONS, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of VINCENT W.COONS, Deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION
INDEX NO.: 190138/09
- against - !
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendants).x
WHEREFORE, defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summary judgmentin the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant, FORD N^pTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Dated: NewYoi
3M.A>i
WiYork
» 2(M6&- & ,3
pFl.
036 *5OG
By: Jordan FoBELLUCK &|Fj546 5th AveniNew York,212-681-1575Counsel for: Plaintiffs
SO ORDERED:tA
FORCE J. SILVERM 2 S Z017
By: Adam L. Sandler, Esq.AARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F:!212-593-6970
RECEIVEDJUN 2 8 2017
PART 10{01782267.DOCX }
top related