following this cover page are scanned images of no ......2017/10/24 · following this cover page...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
-
rSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 9 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONi NYCALi I.A.S. Part 46i (Hon. Lucy Billings)
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates To:JOHN F. CLIFFORD and JOANCLIFFORD,
Index No.: 121913/97; 105235/98111061/98
Plaintiffs NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.C. and S. INC, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY herebytftcfiVv
requests summary judgment in the above entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules
§ 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint against Defendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS
COMPANY with prejudice in this action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEREQ< thatjUponAnotice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed
\\&>with prejudice and without costs. FDated: White Plains, New York % 4Q . I I 2017
CloOdes H • -FirQAttorney for Plaintiffs)Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York NY. 10003(212) 585-5500
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.Attorney for DefendantA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANYECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC10 Bank Street, Suite 700White Plains, New York 10606(914) 949-2909
SO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings
LUCY BILLINGSj.s.c.{V0442212.1}
-
*lI
'
I
I
!:*
RECEIVEDSEP t * 2017
ECKERT SEAMANSCHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Hon. Lucy Billings)This Document Relates To:
JOHN F. CLIFFORD and JOANCLIFFORD,
Index No.: 121913/97; 105235/98111061/98
Plaintiffs AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE- against-
A.C. and S. INC, et al.,
Defendants.STATE OF NEW YORK
ss:COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
Erica Jackson, being duly sworn, deposes and says: deponent is not a party to this action, is over18 years of age and resides in Bronx County, NY.
On September 15, 2017, deponent served a true copy of the annexed EXECUTED NOOPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ON BEHALF OF A.O. SMITHWATER PRODUCTS COMPANY upon:
Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.700 Broadway
New York NY 10003
By depositing a true copy thereof in a post-paid wrapper, in an official depository under the careXXand custody of the United States Postal Service within the State of New York
And the deponent also served a true copy of the annexed EXECUTED NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER ON BEHALF OF A.O. SMITH WATERPRODUCTS COMPANY upon all parties as appearingElectronic filing website at the e-mail addresses designate^XX
Court, State of New York7 the Sunpdisaid parties.
'JL rica/ficksonSworn to before me this
itatoranoNotary Public, State of New Ybik
No.02MA6303438Commission Expires S/19/2018
-
FIFO June 2013 John Clifford Service Rideras of 2/27/2013
USA M PASCAFELLA ESQ.PEHLIVANIAN, 8RAATEN & PASCARELLA. LLC2430 ROUTE 34MANASQUAN NJ 06736PHONE # (732) 528-3888FAX # (732) [email protected] FOR INGERSOLL-RAND,TRANE U.S.INC.,ftk/a AMERICAN STANDARD,INC.JOHN J. FANNING,ESQ.CULLEN & DYKMAN177 MONTAGUE STREETBROOKLYN, NY 11201PHONE#(718) 855-9000FAX # (718) 935-1509COUNSEL FOR BURNHAM, LLC as successor lo BURNHAM CORP. MARIO & DIBONO PLASTERING CO., INC., ANDGOULDS PUMPS,INC.SUZANNE HALBAF01ER, ESO.BARRY. MCTIERNAN & MOORE2 RECTOR STREET, 14 FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10006PHONE #(212) 313-3606FAX # (212) [email protected] FOR CLEAVER-BROOKS.INC.MICHAEL A.TANENBAUM,ESQ.SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN * ARNOLO. UPTHREE GATEWAY CENTER 12TH FLOORNEWARK, NJ 07102PHONE# (973) 242-0002FAX# (973) 242-8099COUNSEL FOR GENERAL ELECTRIC.FOSTER WHEELER L.L.C., AND CBS CORPORATION,a Delaware Corp., f/k/a/VIACOM INC.,successor fay merger to CBS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania Corp., /k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPFRANK A CECERE, ESQ.AHMUTY. DEMERS & MCMANUS200I.U. WILIETS ROADALBERTSON, NY 11507PHONE #(516) 294-5433FAX # (516) [email protected] FOR T1SHMAN REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO.,INC.Heidi C. BakerMcMahon.Martine & Gaflagher, LLP55 Washington StreetBrooklyn,New York 11201Tel. (212) 747-1230 (voicemail ext. 111)Fax (212) [email protected] FOR TISHMAN REALTY A CONSTRUCTION CO„INC.KERRYANN COOK. ESQ.MCGIVNEY& KLUGER,P.C.80BROAD ST.. 23RD FLOORNEW YORK. NY 10004PHONE 212 509-3456r A V Kf\COUNSEL FOR TREADWELL CORP.
-
KIRSTEN KNEIS, ESQK&L GATES LLP5Q9 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022PHONE # (212) 536-3900FAX #(212) 536-3901KIRSTEN.KNEIS@KLGATES COMCOUNSEL FOR CRANE CO.Marc Gaffrey, ESQ.HOAGLANO, LONGO, MORAN, DUNST. 4 DOUKAS40 Paterson StreetNew Brunswick. NJ 06901Tel: (732) 545-4717Fax:(732) [email protected] for Kohler Co.
PHILIP J.O'ROURKE.ESQ.LEWIS 8RISBOIS VISGAARD SMITH LLP77 WATER STREET, 21* FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10005PHONE # (212) 232-1300FAX # (212) 232-1399COUNSEL FOR PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC.
STEVE ROSENBLATT, ESQ.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY830 THIRD AVENUE. SUITE 400NEW YORK, NY 10022PHONE # (212) 651-7600FAX # (212) 651-7499SROSENBLATTflESMSM.COMCOUNSEL FOR WEIL-MCLAIN,a division of THE MARLEY CO. AURORA PUMPSSCOTT R. EMERY ESG.LYNCH DASKALEMERY LLP264 WEST 40TH STREETNEW YORK.NEW YORK 10018PHONE # (212) 302 2400FAX # (212) 302-2210COUNSEL FOR GEORGIA PACIFIC CO.
-
\Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC10 Bank StreetSuite 700White Plains, NY 10606
TEL 914-949-2909FAX 914-949-5424www.eckertseamans.com
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
Laura B. Hollman, Esq(914) [email protected]
September 15, 2017
Via First Class Mail and FacsimileALL KNOWN DEFENSE COUNSEL
Re: June 2013 FIFO CLUSTERJohn Clifford v. A.O. Smith Water Products, Co., et al.,121913/1997308016-00279
Index No.:Our File No.:
Dear Counsel:
We represent Defendant A.O. Smith Water Products Company in the above-referencedmatter. We are in receipt of an executed No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion.
If you object to A.O. Smith Water Products Company's dismissal from this matter, pleaseprovide the basis for this objection and any documents or evidence in support of this objection.
Thank you for your attention regarding this matter.
Very truly yours,ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLCAttorneys for Defendant, A.O. Smith Water Products Company
Laura B. Hollman, Esq.
LBH/ejEnclosures
All Known Defense Counsel ( via Facsimile)cc:
{V0446755.1}
-
*#v
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Billings)Index No: 190420-2010
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CAROL BRADY-ROSE AND VINCENTROSE,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYT MOTION AND ORDER
FPlaintiffs,vs.
CT 2 4 20173M COMPANY, ET AU.C0UN' Y CLERK'S OFFICEV NEW YORK
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS LLC, named in the complaint as“ GOULDS PUMPS, INC.,” hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled fiase;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
Defendants.
defendant GOULDS PUMPS LLC, and its affiliate companies, with prejudice, and there beingno opposition thereto,
ORDEREE), thatjupon” notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstrrdefendant GOULDS PUMPS LLC, and its affiliate companies, be and the same are herebydismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
srt Gitelman Beth L. Hughes, Esq.Brady S. Edwards, Esq.Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLPAttorneys for Defendant101 Park AvenueNew York, NY 10178-0060Phone: (212) 309-6000
RobeNapoli Shkolnik, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiff400 Broadhollow Road, Suite 305Melville, NY 11747Phone: (631) 224-1133
PhSO ORDERED, IOHON. LUCY BILLINGSSEP 1 3 2017
LUCY BILLINGSJS.C. PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
RiSlifiBlSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKSEP 1 3 2017X
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONMVS SUPREMTCOURTX - CIVILThis Document Relates To:
VERNON R. LEARN and MITZIE C. LEARN,NYCALI.A.S. Part 46(Hon. Lucy Billings)
Plaintiff,
-against- IndexNo.: 107883-00NO-OPPOSITION SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERA.C. and S„INC. (ARMSTRONG
CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), et al„
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, Defendant CRANE CO. hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled £ase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiff's complaintagainst Defendant CRANE CO. with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
f t t o f A I O F F O S\'h h S I,ORDERED,that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against DefendantCRANE CO. be, and the same are hereby, dismissed with prejudice and without costs.Dated:
New York, New York
Matthew Tarasoff, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
ozin, Esq.K&L GATES LLPAttorneys for DefendantCRANE CO.599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030 » C O(212) 536-3900 ^ \ W ^14 tWil
t o j z j nSO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings
LUCY BfLLlMGSJ.s.c.
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A S. Part-£fT46IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BUI 1HG3
J.S.C.jNiouitoicirnThis Document Relates to: Index No: 105986/2002
JEAN VITALE Individually and as Administratrix ofthe Estate of ALFONCE VITALE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^ hereby requests summary judgment in theft.cho*''above-entitled e«SB, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintifl,s''complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEREI), thatyjpon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantAvy 'burtj
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
F \ L £°Dated: New York, New Yorkotf * 4Sjj5 , 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. YaviizfEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide'Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Hon..gptoc11. MotrltonLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C.
SO ORDERED, l
SEP 1 3 2017PART 4bMV’S SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALIAS Pait>fl46LuCY BiLLINGS(MoultearP^” J.S.C.Index No: 105986/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JEAN VITALE Individually and as Administratrix ofthe Estate of ALFONCE VITALE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintins ĉomplaint
against defendant Amchem Products, Inc7with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEREI^, that, uporAiotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantAmchem Products, Inc7be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
e t \-Dated: New York, New YorkSM , 2017
°P\C
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPIT!Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVIAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
& BLAU LLPR P.A.
lottjnSO ORDERED,Hon. Pfvter H Moulton
LUCY BILLINGSr *•
S E P 1 3 2 0 1 7N_YS_SUPREMECOURT ' CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Parted46(MfluitenrPT LUCY BfLLlNGS
J .S .C .
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Index No: 102692/2003
JOYCE VERDEROSA as the Administratrix of theEstate of VINCENT VERDEROSA
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation,, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled̂ paSeTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'"*complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
jo*'" AW- AUuvJfiAtyOpposihS*^ORDEREE^ thatjUpon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
5Jli , 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz; Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, ^ FlodrNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
i t / z/n'UJSTWHNGSJ.S.C.SO ORDERED,
Hon.
S E P 1 3 2017Mvr. PART 46NYS SUPRe^ COURT “ CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part^fe(MonLtoftr~P~) yjCY BtLIndexNo: 102692/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
J.S.C.This Document Relates to:
JOYCE VERDEROSA as the Administratrix of theEstate of VINCENT VERDEROSA
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled^aee; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc7with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
Pn>r rffoJib'd*)ORDERED̂ thatyipon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
F I L E DDated: New York, New York
OCT 2 4 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK/ I
, 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITAttorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavg^Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVIAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
& BLAU LLPR P.A.
L-J^SO ORDERED, Hon. P[tn IT Mmilfrm— •LUCY BILLINGS
J.S .C . SEP 1 3 2017PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Mouite«rÊ ~ :Index No: 121970/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
K7?4:JU
This Document Relates to: . ..
PAUL NADEAU and THERESA NADEAU, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^ hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitled satStT, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
F I L E DDated: New York, New YorkSjM OCT 2 4 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF1NEW YORK j
, 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
( t/̂ j ry pjnSO ORDERED, / 0Hon. Petet-HrMoulldn *LUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C .SEP 1 3 2017
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part(MaultonrPT'lIndex No: 121970/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION f
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part
LUCY BiLLENGSJ.S.C.
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Index No: 105986/2002
LISA LUNDY as Administratrix of the Estate ofTHOMAS MARION
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation,hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED,that,upoiTnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
f \Dated: New York, New YorkOtf ^ 4
C°UNTVN^OB°F, 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
ipplLUCY BILUNGS
J.S.C.
SO ORDERED,Hon. EetetHrMoulton
SEP I 3 20I7PART 46_ COURT - rn/r.NYS SUPREME
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part^f 6(Mojiltoar T̂'LUCY BILLINGIndex No: 105986/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
LISA LUNDY as Administratrix of the Estate ofTHOMAS MARION
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled gase;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.^ with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED,thatjupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantAW. OfYoiffVdHj
Amchem Products, Inc.;be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
c°n °̂« °F/2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. YavitzpEsq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVIAttorneys for Amchem Products) Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
& BLAU LLP
tQ(j/nSO ORDERED, "MoultonLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C.SEP 1 3 2017
PART 46— fflURT - CIVILN Y S SUPREME
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part >0 4̂ ^(Motrittfi; P.YIndexNo: 110985/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BlU'- CS
•V* .This Document Relates to:
RONALD FOWLER and SARAH FOWLER, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled spae; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED^ thatjupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
OCT 14W1, 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz “Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITE & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Eeter+r ivioulton
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C. SEP 1 3 2017
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Partyf 4b
UJGY B L̂w.Index No: 110985/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
s; t.
This Document Relates to:
RONALD FOWLER and SARAH FOWLER, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled casCTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.jWith prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, thatjiipon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Inc? be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
41W1S /2% , 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. 'WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. YavitzyEsq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, me.116 East 27th Street, 12* FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
i— a sSO ORDERED,Hon.JIctw IL MEutluii'
LUCY BILLINGS B>SEP 1 3 20,7
- CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part
f̂iulteirPrl_UCY BULLIMGSIndex No: 120704/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
J .S.C .This Document Relates to:
GEORGE DOLL and CANDIDA DOLL, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled faseTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,pn'or AW
ORDERED,thatjupon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
i0 , 2017yCS OFF'C.
N'
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz, Escfr /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor INew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Pe on
LUCY BILLINGSJ .S.C. S E P 1 3 2017
PART 46.NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part#f 4*( Moaiio»r̂ t~ LUCY BJLLluobIndex No: 120704/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
GEORGE DOLL and CANDIDA DOLL, his wife NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
ox.h'°*above-entitled aecSSlpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,pr ».̂
ORDERED,thatj upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantA
Amchem Products, Inc^ be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
SjlS , 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz^Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVFTZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 F \ L £°
U IO'1odOFFICE
SO ORDERED,Hon. .Peter II. MoiilLOU
LUCY BILLINGSSEP 1 3 2017
' CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part^46^MsultenTPr"-Index No: 117331/2001
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BHtJLSMGS
a Q ^
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S . Part r̂ 46(WxAttnTFT Lucr;- * " 1 'Index No: 110285/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION s
This Document Relates to:
ANGELA DEVITO, Individually and as ProposedAdministratrix of the Estate of JOSEPH DEVITO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in thetucArio*
above-entitled^aseTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'complaintagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
fn'i/' M*/ / A MORDERED̂ thatyipon’notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
s )is 0u, 2017COOH^O^
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavitz, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAAttorneys for Union Carbide (torporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloodNew York, NY 10016 '(212) 452-5300
Z & BLAU LLP
Hon. Pgtfirjy— MinihnnSO ORDERED, LUCY BILLINGSJ.s.c. SEP 1 3 2017
- CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Partly
Index No: 110285/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION - ( s.
This Document Relates to:
ANGELA DEVITO, Individually and as ProposedAdministratrix of the Estate of JOSEPH DEVITO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled j^ŝ rpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff^complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
pnV 0/*/*Jo\ovJr AAV/ a ffoSt'tiM /ORDEREDĵ that^uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Inc.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
hjzs OCT i * W'tco
, 2017
bFF/&E
Judith A. Yrwitz, Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FlolorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
«7 Hon. PctrrH Mi mill i l l
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.
SO ORDERED,
SEP 1 3 2017PART 46
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part >^46 LUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C.
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Index No: 110985/2002
JOHN CZELADYN and ELLEN CZELADYN, hiswife
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in the
*cfi'o«4above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED^that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
F \ L E°Dated: New York, New YorkOtf ^ 4, 2017
F\CE
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. /WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. YaviK, Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
lM*lr7SO ORDERED, Hon. PrtcrTI. Moulton REQEBWEDLUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C . SEP 1 3 2017
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. PartSVr4*»(MouitenrPI—Index No: 110985/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BS.UH6S
This Document Relates to:
JOHN CZELADYN and ELLEN CZELADYN, hiswife
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
Ach'd”above-entitled caeerpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc.;with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
priov os+d. '/AkkORDERED^ha^ upon*notice to all co-defendants’, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Incvbe and the same are hereby dismissed witl^jjej^d^e and without costs.f \ V-Dated: New York, New York% 4
2017OFF\C£
Judith A. Yavfô T Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
SO ORDERED,Hon. Petu: IT. Muuliun
LUCY BILLINGSj.s.c.
SEP 1 3 201?
CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part 4̂-6(MoultenrrrIndex No: 110285/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION Y R 5U
J.S.C.This Document Relates to:VITO COLONNA as proposed Administrator of theEstate of FRANK COLONNA
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation,hereby requests summary judgment in theabove-entitlcd_£a&e:pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff’s'complamtagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
(In'cr 0 of foHti'M,ORDERED thatyupon n̂otice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
act *, 2017co^eN^
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A S. Part KT46 s(MoiiitenTPlIndex No: 110285/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION :-cL:
This Document Relates to:
VITO COLONNA as proposed Administrator of theEstate of FRANK COLONNA
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case^pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plamtiffs' complaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
pri'sr
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI A S.(NlauitenrPTT-'
Index No: 101842/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION s
f*i,,'^VaThis Document Relates to:
DELEZI CANTALUPO as the Executrix for the Estateof ANTHONY CANTALUPO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporatioiy hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitied £asc7pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
fr\>r **7 i h M ,ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed vsed \uth prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkg|2-S , 2017
,\cs°
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavjtz, Esq. IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12* FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, i Qn/**1 *̂Hon. Petef-H. MOullon *
LUCY BILLINGSJ.SiC* SEP 1 3 2017
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part(Moulterr^) v H s /r-Y r*Index No: 101842/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DELEZI CANTALUPO as the Executrix for the Estateof ANTHONY CANTALUPO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled^aserpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffcomplaintagainst defendant Amchem Products, Inc,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
prtiT *Mw*Ar(M*Z offosih*iORDERED,thatyuponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Inc.;be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkilW
, 20170%
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. YavitzfEsq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ/& BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, line.116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor ^New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Qpi^s i°li/nHon. PgtexH-MoutinnLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C .
SO ORDERED,
S E P 1 3 2017
SUPREME C.nnoT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part f̂W
’ LUCY BILLINGSJ .S .C .
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to: Index No: 104726/2003
JAMES CALICCHIO and LUCILLE CALICCHIO,his wife
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation^ hereby requests summary judgment in theA-offerabove-entitlcd_£a£e:pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
fIni*"ORDERED^thalj upon*notice to all co-defendant's, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
E h8 , 2017
Judith A. Yavi -̂Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor*'New York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
Kevin M. Berry, Esq.WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
L—^SO ORDERED, Hon. PytcrH MonltnnLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C. SEP 1 3 2017PART 46
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A S. Part(M21iltenr1rT-IndexNo: 104726/2003
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION LUCY BILLINGS
J .S .CThis Document Relates to:
JAMES CALICCHIO and LUCILLE CALICCHIO,his wife
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case-, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Amchem Products, Inc.,with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,prtof W tdoyAfiirav^ opfou'h*̂ORDERED, thatjUpon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Incbe and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
5J2S , 2017
Kevin M. Berry, Esq. »WILENTZ GOLDMAN & SPITZER P.A.Attorneys for Plaintiffs110 William Street, 26th FloorNew York, NY 10005(212) 267-3091
Judith A. Yavit£-Esq. IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITEi & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products Inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, BECE&BBLUCY BILLINGSJ .S.C . SEP 1 3 2017
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Partj*r4+(MojjjtenTPrT LwIndex No: 107263/2002
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION \UGSJ.S.C.
r .ir *\
This Document Relates to:
IRENE BUCCIERO, Individually and as Executrix forthe Estate of MICHAEL H. BUCCIERO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled casg, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiff^complaintagainst defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendantUnion Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
£0Dated: New York, New York
% j l8co
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALI.A.S. Part&r̂ 49IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION ( MmkerffTPl
s
-
SEP 1 3 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL
xThis Document Relates To:
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON
BEHALF OF FORD MOTORCOMPANY
EDWARD PAUL O’NEILL,
Plaintiff(s),
-against- Index No.: 03-108966FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Defendant(s).x
WHEREFORE, defendani^.JFORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request* summaryjudgment in the above-entitled caserpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffcomplaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
f T .ORDERED, that;upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017
By: Brian Early, Esq. —EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-69701
i .,/vv/v] akinSO ORDERED: HON. Gj.s.c.
655112v{02029524.DOC }
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 3 2017XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAL PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
XThis Document Relates To:
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON
BEHALF OF FORD MOTORCOMPANY
RONALD BALA,
PlaintifF(s),
-against- Index No.: 03-109335FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants).x
WHEREFORE, defendaij^FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-en t i t l edpursuan t to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'̂ complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
otJr***f off* & fob*,ORDERED^ that uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant^ FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017
By: Brian Early, Esq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK, 10017
By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10Q6^\T: 212-593-6700 \F: 212-593-6Stfp \ V
SO ORDERED:HON. GE
CY BILLINGSj.s r c
655112v{02029500.DOC }
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK . PPOEUWEID)COUNTY OF NEW YORKx SEP 1 3 2017NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates To:NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ONBEHALF OF FORD MOTOR
COMPANY
JOSEPH BUSA,
Plaintiff(s),
-against- IndexNo.: 03-109470FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Defendant(s).x
WHEREFORE, defendant.^ORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request*summaryjudgment in the above-entitled cas&7 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'̂ complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that,upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant^ FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017
By: Brian Early, Esq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 20 FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEEN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700 ^ r\F: 212-593-697^^^ Wu-̂ ry >sLrhSO ORDERED:
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.
655112v{02029462.DOC }
-
t r SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCALPart 46(Billings)
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Applies to:Index No. 105714/2002
ANGELO C. ABRUZZINO and BARBARAABRUZZINO,
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES. INC.
Plaintiffs,-against-
A.C. and S„Inc. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING &SUPPLY)., et al„
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summary
judgment in the above entitled jaass; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in this
action, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED̂ that, upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
-HAD - xanoa awatwns SAN9P1WMand without costs.
m s T d3S tDated: New York, New York
JaooivSiebel, EsqAttorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003 *(212) 558-5500 ^ \ V
Steven T. Corbin, Esq.Attorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005212.232.1300File No. 1863.5144
ishlnSO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S .C.
4848-9410-2347.1
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALPart 46(Billings)
This Document Relates to:Index No. 109247/00
RALPH A. MINERVINO and ANN P. ROBINSON asCo-Executors for the Estate of JOSEPH L.MINERVINO, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAS TO DEFENDANTPEERLESS INDUSTRIES.INC.
Plaintiff(s),-against-
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above entitled pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant, PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., with prejudice in thisaction, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that yipon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant PEERLESS INDUSTRIES, INC., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
cô ^ei'1 s°yLyMAL.Suzann^/Ratcliffe, Esq.RebeAttorney for DefendantPeerless Industries, Inc.LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP77 Water Street, 21st FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 232-1300File No. 1863.18645
ee, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 Broadway 1New York, NY 10003212.558.5500
E I J 3S
L-Ĵ J ryiln̂ 55 ( olsjnSO ORDEREDHon. Lucy Billings
LUCY B1LL1MGSj.s.c.
4817-9774-0108.1
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 110268/02In Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
FALYN E. STEWART, as Executrix for the Estateof DONALD E. STEWART, and FALYN E.STEWART, Individually
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
Plaintiff(s),
- against -A.C. and S, INC., et ai.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled jzase; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto, ^ORDERED^ that, upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant^ Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.
New York, New YorkDated: , 2017
atcliffe, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
zannlSEGSINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.
*l*faSO ORDERED,
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 46NYSSUPREMECOURT- iIndex No.: 119390/00 *yiLIn Re: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR, NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTIONPlaintiff(s),
- against -A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant WEIL-MCLAIN hereby requests Summary Judgment in theabove-entitled cascr pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against Defendant Weil-McLain with prejudice, and there being noopposition thereto,
ORDERED thatj upon1notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant^ Weil-McLain be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without coststo either party.
rr
. Spfihnbh £New'York, New
Dated: 2017York
J^ison Yjmipolsky, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SEGATTMC( AMBRIITGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantWeil-McLain850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500 F I L E D
LUCY BILUftGSOCT 2 4 2017SO ORDERED,
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
-
/
•'•<(4
i
t
I
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 7(HON.RONALD N. RUBIN and RONNI RUBIN,
r •*, * tLUCY IPlaintiff(s), INDEX NO.: 190451/11 J.S.C.vs.
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERA.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.
et aL,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Turner Construction Company, requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled caeerpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing Plaintiffs* Complaint against Defendant, Turner Construction Company, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
t̂ -4. *1* dff
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: NYCAL
I.A.S. Part 50(HON. PFTFRH MOMITON A I S E-frRICHARD ROKOSZAK, as Special
Administrator for the Estate ofHENRY J. ROKOSZAK,
r • \
LUCY uINDEX NO.: 190508/1f
Plaintiff(s),
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
vs.
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO.et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Riley Power Inc., requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing Plaintiffs Complaint against
Defendant, Riley Power Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,YiV'' offtrti' hWj
ORDERED^ tha^ upon n̂otice to all Co-Defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, Riley Power Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice without costs.
Dated: NewYocK, New York~7pO
C — rMidi11 PiykiflgL Esq, 'jtfry) C.Ex/1r*~ jWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.700 Broadway, 6th FloorNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500Attorneys for Plaintiffs)
, 2017
Giovanni Regina) Esq.WATERS, MbPH233 BroadwayNew York, New York 10279(212) 227-7878Attorneys for Defendant Riley
ERSON, McNEILL, P.C.
lac.D
OCT 2 4 2017
°UNZCLE^S OFFNEW YORK FSO ORDERED:
Hon. Rotor H. Moulton; A.J.S?LUCY BILL1MGS
JSC.ICE
-
: :r• , ' ~' nwp’n=s,.VS
!) lIiCLBS6821/legal/nosjm/May 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKSEP 1 4 20)7
X - CIVILRICHARD J. VARI, SR., NO OPPOSTSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERPlaintiffs),
-against- IndexNo.: 111250/04,113281/97, 111028/98 &104522/97
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., NYCALI.A.S. Part
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendant/ CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC^hereby request%ummary*cft ô \judgment in the above-entitledaets l pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiff*/*complaint against defendant CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDEREDthat,uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant/ CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.,be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
Shawn&tteFluitt, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantCLEAVER-BROOKS, INC.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
to/417SO ORDERED1}$Hon. LUCY BILLINGS
J .S .C .,-wcov^Vs°
-
Oi(SE(!VtS0X:RWA/53392JDISM1SSALS/NOSJM SEP 1 4 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK L N Y S SUPREME COURT
NO OPPOSITION SUMTOJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
X - CIVILIRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS,Plaintiff(s),
- against - Index No.: 190082/09
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION hereby requestJsummaryjudgment in the above-entitled case;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
«»v\.y effofih'&jORDERED,that,upon'notice to all co-defendant^ all claims and cross claims against
pn*v
defendant^ R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION, be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.
Div^kslcr, Esq. iAttorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
William A. Cooney, Esq. fAttorneys for R.W. Beckett CorporationBarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
nnr
F I L E 0ro/4/17SO ORDERED,Hon. Lucy Billings
OCT l *P-SLUCY BltUNJ.S.C.
-
SEP J 4 2017FBW49173/!egal/nosjm/May 2013SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 46— COURT - CIVILNYS SUPREMEX
RICHARD J. VARI, SR NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDERP1aintiff(s),
-against- IndexNo.: 111250/04,113281/97, 111028/98 &104522/97
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„ NYCAEI.A.S. Part
Defendant(s),X
WHEREFORE, defendant^FULTON BOILER WORKS hereby request*summaryC\Ch'o”judgment in the above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'̂:omplaint against defendant^ FULTON BOILER WORKS with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
prfiv'' fash's*)ORDEREEĵ thal^uponnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant^ FULTON BOILER WORKS be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
^8^Phan Alvarado, Esq.Attorney for PlaintiffWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York. New York 10003
Charles Neal, Esq.Attorneys for DefendantFULTON BOILER WORKSBarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
\ t£°,»Mn FSO ORDERED,41̂LUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C.Off'o£i
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION
Index No. 190524/2011FRANK AYALA and MARGARITA AYALA,
Plaintiffs,STIPULATION
DISCONTINUING ACTIONWITH PREJUDICE
- against -A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned, theattorneys of record for the plaintifljand defendant(s) named below in the above entitled action, thatwhereas no party hereto is an infant, incompetent person for whom a committee has been appointedor conservatee and no person not a party has an interest in the subject matter of the action, theabove entitled action be, and the same hereby is discontinued, in accordance with the terms of theaccompanying release, with prejudice as to GOULD ELECTRONICS INC. and ABB INC. withoutcosts to any party as against the other. This stipulation may be filed without further notice withthe Clerk of the Court.
Dated:, New York, New YorkS&jewbeR. 7.2017
JameŝWEITAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
f\(' fa Aof/'dc Jo Co'AA&Afi&to/h£.4" if
-
[RMIWEB)SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 1 3 2017
xGALSUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
This Document Relates To:NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ONBEHALF OF FORD MOTOR
COMPANY
WILLIAM MCDONAGH,
Plaintiffs),
Index No.: 03-109079-against-FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Defendant(s).x
WHEREFORE, defendiujMFORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby request* summaryjudgment in the above-entitled^Serpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs'*complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, thatyUpon^notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant,FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
..A
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017
By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 10016T: 212-593-6700F: 212-593-6970
By: Brian EEARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE 20 FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
Lbsq.
\,fcOL tiw
OO ŜN***>*/ ilnSO ORDERED:
HON. GERALD LEBOVITSLUCY BILLINGS
655112V{02029490.DOC }
-
.«*v#u V / 1SEP 1 3 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKPART 46
NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVILXIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCAC
xThis Document Relates To:
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ON
BEHALF OF FORD MOTORCOMPANY
GEORGE J. MCMAHON,
Plaintiff(s),
-against- Index No.: 03-109083FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants).x
WHEREFORE, defendaj^t^FORD MOTOR COMPANY hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case7 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs*complaint against defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY with prejudice,and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED that^ upon n°tice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims againstdefendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkAugust 24, 2017
/
By: Brian Early, Esq.EARLY, LUCARELLI, SWEENEY &MEISENKOTHENATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS360 LEXINGTON AVENUE 20TH FLOORNEW YORK, NEW YORK 10017
By: Hilary S. MacklinAARONSON RAPPAPORT FEINSTEIN &DEUTSCH, LLPAttorneys for DefendantFord Motor Company600 Third AvenueNew York, New York 1001(5T: 212-593-6700 . V VF: 212-593-6970^ \ V ^
% KSO ORDERED:
HON.JjERALErEEBOVFFS-»LUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C . O'
655112v{02029506.DOC }
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Partitf 46(Silvgfc-GeorgrTTLUCY BtLLlNGS
J.S.C.Index No.: 115633/01; 111218/01
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH P. SWIADOWSKY NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
^chattythe above-entitled fi&SS, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, thatj upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
ep/ otih'lMj
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New YorkQELAA , 2017
r—Charles Ferguson, Esq. ]LAJLJLA,Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ONew York, New York 10005 % **
Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
lojiofnSO ORDERED,Hon. Ororge J. Silver-
&TllK;LUUY BiLLiMGS
J.S.C.3369634
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part^ilyeirGcorgeJ'; JiCY BiUWGS
Index No.: 101812/08This Document Relates to:
ROY F. SCHNETTLER NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled jsasgp pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that, upon'* notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New Yorkn^ . qa , 2017Dated:
Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005 .
Charles Ferguson, EsqWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
i Yin' lajiojnSO ORDERED, ^\ceHon. George J. Silverx JIGY m j r T.. nm3369634
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. PartTCr ^6^Siiyefr t̂eorge j.)
Index No.: 111047/98; 113287/98;190391/11
This Document Relates to:
JOSEPH T. SANDERNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment infac-f-iaHthe above-entitled ca$C pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.yisS djf fa( ihWf
ORDERED^ that^ upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New YorkQS- - ga , 2017
Dated:
~1Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
T%\1SO ORDERED,
Hon. Geuige J. SllVei*L oC- fedl7
\ •< ,sI : •!3369634
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Partied(Silvi ge J.)
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 124356/94; 124374/94;115998/95; 111041/98; 100917/08
WALTER A. REILLYNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, thatj uponAnotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New York0 8 3.2 , 2017
Dated:
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
7ANicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC .88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ^ yNew York, New York 10005* \ y»»
*SO ORDERED,Hon. Goorgo J. Silver—L
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. PartXT4b
BILLINGSJ S C
Index No.: 106709/02; 115527/02This Document Relates to:
JOHN P. PATTERSON SR. NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled jcasS , pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED^ thatj upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New York, 2017
Dated:
vs
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
lojidjnLSO ORDERED, off'06Hon. George-J-i Silveri v/c
j.s.a3369634
-
REQ,SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK
CI\/iLIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part >0̂ 4(Silvej^JGeergerTjThis Document Relates to:
' /V
Index No.: 107208/00; 125766/99;107208/00
RALPH A. MENENDEZNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled £ase, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that^upon'Yotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
fJw*A4*17
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York0 Sr . g 2 , 2017
! 2^2Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
c T*'/SO ORDERED,
Hon. Goorge J. Silver o^ceLUCY BILLINGS
j.s.c3369634
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 0 2017
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part>^4̂(SiiXBCrOeoigeTJLUQY BILLINGS
J.S.C.
CIVIL
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 111191/96;
117843/02;113280/97; 111069/98;109675/99;190172/09WILLIAM E. JOYCE
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment inOjcJ'intA
the above-entitled cage”, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED thatj upon"notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York(3S~ -A9- , 2017
X 7NNicholas P. Eliades, Esq.Charles Ferguson, Esq.
Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005 .\ '
SO ORDERED,Hon. George -fr Silver
BILLINGS3369634
-
WfiCSEP 2SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK0 201?
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part/Kf^b
- CIVILXP - -GS
J&G..7t
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 106973/08
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
AUSTIN C. JOERGER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled £asC pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.peps' offoi( bl>v(
ORDERHIVthatj upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New YorkDated:
0 %_ &cL , 2017
-n—Charles Ferguson, Esq. x*)Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ^ ANew York, New York 10005 \ **
i
Lj^ry.iĥ ts hh„jnHon. Goorgi 5/ SilverL SiHi
SO ORDERED,
c
3369634
-
RGOSDVEDSEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKPART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 4b
^ 2 V '"’V'A -7llV|This Document Relates to:
Index No.: 103506/02; 103418/96;111068/98
RONALD D. HANDZLIKNO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in0.CfiV\
the above-entitled c^sef pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.Qnor »vJL abi(MA O^ofih**,ORDERED^ that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
, 2017
:^folas P. Eliades, Esq.Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
NicMcElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th Floor ^ XNew York, New York 10M5^^ V*l — *os
Hon. George J. Silver. ibjiojl')SO ORDERED,L vc7
3369634 V-'iT &c. J -- J > y*
-
RECEIVEDSEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part>0^__^Silyeiy^teGfgeT)"Index No.: 190137/09
This Document Relates to: . •M -
FRANKIE FUGATE NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in4LCH'OH
the above-entitled jxtpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDEREQ, that, upoif notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
08" - , 2017
V
Charles Ferguson, Esq. NJ Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
loj /o jnSO ORDERED,Hon. George J. Silvci
7
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.C.3369634
-
SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART «*NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. PartM*1'(Silvsr
-
SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part JJTU
; c r-This Document Relates to: -T fIndex No.: 111089/02
JAMES WILLIAM CARR NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled caser pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED that,upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.New York, New YorkDated:
Qg £2 , 2017
\_
Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
^ \ UL 0>'JK-3S *M/nSO ORDERED, Hon. George J. Silver' ISr i, f » :ol
3369634 vC
_V- O'
-
SEP 2 0 1017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PAR) 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 4*(Silver^JjeergeT)
Index No.: 111050/98; 111440/98;123718/99; 190007/09
• •rThis Document Relates to:
DOUG CHAPPLENO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled a«Se7 pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto. „ORDERED^ that, upon*notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New YorkDated:
2 , 2017
u£L̂ P, ZJLQ̂Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,
Charles Ferguson, Esq. N^JWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
I Q-df*— 15s tojio/ nSO ORDERED,Hon. Georgo J. Silver
USGVE:? :3369634 J
-
Ri(SE!¥SDSEP 2 0 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S.?ait^4b
This Document Relates to:Index No.: 115075/98; 108709/01
RALPH N. BORELLI NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled ^ea§e, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.pr / a*'' f i f t y Of [dSi f iO »\
ORDERED^ thatjUpon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New YorkDated:
Os as , 2017
7Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
t— nmn-ns io/iojn C \ V-Hon. George J. Silver *SO ORDERED,OCT 2
COUNTYCLERK'S0
NEWYORK^\ceLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C3369634
-
j^ECOEIWEDSEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
' NVS SUPREMÊ COURT - CIVILIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part Yf
ILLINGSJ.S.C.
;e J .IThis Document Relates to:
Index No.: 106480/93; 132167/93;100387/08
CHARLES BAGGIANONO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled gaser pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED^ thaj upon'Votice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
New York, New YorkDated:
, 2017
X naNicholas P. Eliades, Esq.McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
f U-l io)/*/nSO ORDERED,Hon. Goorgo J. Silver
L S J L JLUCY BILLINGS3369634
J.S.C*
-
0SEP 2 0 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKCIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. ParLKf^TSjlysfrCteorge JQ :•->
- i----- 1.This Document Relates to: . >• -Index No.: 190107/09
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
RAPHAEL ARONE
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED,that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst defendant Burnham LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
O.'O U A A A D i t i*/
and without costs.
New York, New York, 2017
Dated:
Ns^ Nicholas P. Eliades, Esq.Charles Ferguson, Esq.Weitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003-4925
McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter,LLPAttorneys for Defendant Burnham LLC88 Pine Street, 24th FloorNew York, New York 10005
[— *'**7 icjinjnHon. George J. Silver—SO ORDERED, i^-UMi3369634
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
SEP 2 0 2017NyS SUPREMECOMPTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part«5# 4̂4>
* CIVIL
(MfinltettrFT •i - £*JMC.This Document Relates to:
INDEX NO.: 100862-03;110194-04JEANNE LOWE, as Executrix for the Estate of
ROBERT A. LOWE and JEANNE LOWE,Individually NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case; pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Burnham LLC with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto.pn
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 0 2017
ws SUPREM^ennoTIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCALI.A.S. Part>0
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK SEP 2 0 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. PartiT46
PART 46NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
(MfluRoflTFTLUCY BILUNGS
J.S.C.This Document Relates to: Index No.: 108721/2000CHARLES R. THURLO
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND
ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Burnham LLC (“ Burnham LLC” ) hereby requests summary&.
-
^ECEflVEOSEP 8 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORKPART 46
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX
NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONIN REx
Index No.CONO AMILO MASCARELLA, 109071-00
April 2016 In ExtremisWeitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Plaintiffs,
v.NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDERAC and S, INC, et al., including GENERALELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY sued herein hereby request^summary judgment in the above-entitled ^aserpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing plaintiffs^complaint against defendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
pr\V Offdsih'SH)ORDERED,that,upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: New York,New York
OR-.q£ - !7
Charles M. Ferguson, Esq>Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C.Attorneysfor Plaintiff(s)700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
Michael A. Tanenbaum, Esq.v-JTanenbaum Keale LLPAttorneys for General Electric Company1085 Raymond Blvd.One Newark Center, 16th FloNewark, NJ 07102
LUCY BILLINGSJ.s.c.
SO ORDERED,
-
SEP 7 2017X‘R1 yA/53392JDISMISSALS/ XOSJMSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
PART 46NYi lUPRBMg COURT - CIVIL
XIRWIN MORRIS and SANDRA MORRIS, NO OPPOSITION SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDERPlaintiff(s),
- against - Index No.: 190082/09
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO,et al.; NYCALI.A.S. Part f̂^Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION hereby request*summaryjudgment in the above-entitled naseTpursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendants R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,.
ORDERED,that^upori'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstdefendant^ R. W. BECKETT CORPORATION,be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.
- -— AdaurDicksItr, Esq*. ,Attorney for PlaintiffsWeitz & Luxenberg700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
William A. Cooney, Escfr'"^Attorneys for R.W. Beckett CorporationBarry McTiernan & Moore2 Rector Street, 141'1 FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
F I L E DSO ORDERED, L— ^Hon. Lucy BillingsOCT 2 4 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEC NEW YORK
EH
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI. A. S. Part^T4*»(Moulton,-Jr)fo i imqj , L.Index No.: 190406/10
XThis document relates to:
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor ofThe Estate of PATRICK T. SLEVIN
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
X
WHEREAS, Defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. (“ Buffalo Pumps” ), requests#.ch‘o*o
summary judgment in the above-entitled caa< pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section3212, dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint against Buffalo Pumps, without prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED,that^upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstBuffalo Pumps^be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
bes 5^“Z,o
Keith Binder, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff
' HoILB; , LAWLER & BUBA
140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Counsel for Air and Liquid SystemsCorp., as successor by merger toBuffalo Pumps
I— rlr1 iojtnjnSO ORDERED, MgeEWEPHon. Potor Moulton;JrSSEP 2 0 2017
{00398438.DOCX}LUCY BILLINGS
j.s.cPART 46„_
nvc SUPREME COURT - cwtt
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI. A. S. Part(Moitkon. J . )
Bilim L.Index No.: 104081/08
XThis document relates to:
JANE KEENAN, as ADMINISTRATRIX ofThe Estate of JOHN RESKER
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTIONAND ORDER
X
WHEREAS, Defendant AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, AS
SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BUFFALO PUMPS, INC. (“ Buffalo Pumps” ), requestsathb*summary judgment in the above-entitled case;pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section
3212, dismissing Plaintiffs complaint against Buffalo Pumps, without prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto, it is herebyfn'iy /^7ORDERED^thatj upon'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Buffalo Pump^ be and the same are hereby dismissed without prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
TU.
Niehdas Novack, Esq.LEVY KONIGSBERG LLP800 Third Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022Counsel for Plaintiff
John S. Hogarth, Esq.WILBRA140 Broadway, 46th FloorNew York, NY 10005Counsel for Air and Liquid SystemsCorp., as successor by merger toBuffalo Pumps
, LAWLER & BUBA
Hon. Feter-Moultoii, J. V
UMJ BillingLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C
SO ORDERED,
SEP * » ml{00398439.DOCX}
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190323/10In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONMANUEL A. CHINEA and JANET M. CHINEA,
Plaintiffs,NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
- against -
AMERICAN OPTICAL COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant AURORA PUMP COMPANY hereby requests Summarytf-Cpl'O*Judgment in the above-entitled .case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against Defendant Aurora Pump Company with prejudice, andthere being no oppos.t.on thereto^ ^ o,ORDERED that^upoif notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefSndany Aurora Pump Company be and the same are hereby dismissed 'With prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerkof the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separatecounterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all
"-V:
purposes of this motion.Dated: A*, 2017
New York, New York
°Cr2Brian Early, EsqrTHE EARLY LAW FIRM, LLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 20lh FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 986-2233
Sarah R. Haag-Fisk, Bsq.SEGAL McCAMBRHHSINGER & MAHONEY, LTDAttorneys for DefendantAurora Pump Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
^®/o
V
s0/?/f 0/>/c
RFIDIPWEDSEP 2 o 2017
i Tlr>ĥ 3SO ORDERED, lLUCY BILLINGS
J.S.C.PART A6
NYS SUPREME COURT • CIVIL
-
ggg©Eq 1 5..
Uh SEP 15 2017i
SEGAL MCCAMBRIDGE SINGER & MAHONEY
-
. :.Jfc ..I*-J •a-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
Index No.: 190066/08In Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATIONTHOMAS DOUGHERTY,
Plaintiff,NO OPPOSITION
SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
- against -
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests Summary
Judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant H.B. Fuller Company with prejudice, andthere being no oppos.t.on thereto^ORDEREDthat,upon'Yiotice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant^ H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk
of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate
counterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all
purposes of this motion.Dated: 2016
ew York, N$w York
Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGESINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
Adam S. Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
lSO ORDERED,Hon. utton
LUCY BILLINGSJ.S.c
SEP 2 0 2017PART 4$NVS SUPREME COURT. CIVIL
-
I•c:
.j^r - JD.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIn Re: NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION Index No.: 108873/02
118526/98JANICE E. FARRELL as Personal Representativefor the Estate of ROBERT C. FARRELL andJANICE E. FARRELL, Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTIONPlaintiffs,
- against -
A.C. and S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING& SUPPLY), et al.,
Defendants.
WHEREFORE, Defendant H.B. FULLER COMPANY hereby requests Summary*dri upon/'notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims againstDefendant, H.B. Fuller Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs to either party. This stipulation may be filed without further notice with the Clerk
of the Court. This No Opposition Summary Judgment Motion may be signed in separate
counterparts and facsimile or PDF signatures shall be deemed to be original signatures for all
purposes of this motion.
Dated: F' t e o10 -25 , 2016New York, New York-UFstjN- Busehy-L&lT
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
t/lSOU Katrina H. Murphy, Esq.. SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE
SINGER & MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for DefendantH.B. Fuller Company850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, NY 10022(212) 651-7500
ijfio/ n
COu/\/TyY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
[RiESEflWE®iHon. Retgiji-Muul ( onBILLINGS
J.S.C.
SO ORDERED,
SEP 2 0 2017PART 46
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x Index No.: 119472/2001THOMAS J. MURRAY and PATRICIA MURRAY,
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITIONSU