following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition … · 2017-06-16 · following this...
TRANSCRIPT
Following this cover page are scanned images of no-opposition summary judgment motions and ordersfiled on the selected date. The documents are displayedin no particular order. However, all of these documentsare searchable.
To find a specific order, please use the Search/Findfunction within a PDF viewer.
1) Select Edit > Find in the main menu or press Ctrl-f(Command-f or Apple-f on a Mac);
2) Enter the index number, a word, or a phrase in the formfield provided and press Enter or Return.
In most applications, the first appearance of the indexnumber, the word, or the phrase in the document will behighlighted.
Tip: Ctrl-f opens the Find function in most applications,including browsers and PDF viewers.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
CHARLENE K. SNODGRASS, Individually andas Executrix of the Estate of ORVAL G.SNODGRASS, Deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NYCAL
RiciSfii]JUN 14 2017_
^PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index Nos.: 114402/07
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants. :X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
4/1]/7BELLUCAttorneys
F LLPti
Jord Fox, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyeaj/Canada Inc.
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(646) 248-6015
Dated: New York, New York
^ Lawrence G. Lee/Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:
P I L E DJUN 16 20/7
Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C. COUNTY CLERK'S
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
NEW7ORSK0FF'CB
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
KENNETH H. TODD, as Executor of the Estate ofVICTOR ALFRED TODD, Deceased,
X
X
NYCAL
K1 E1¥E0JUN 1 4 2017
kPART 50_ NY$ SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index Nos.: 109984/2008
Plaintiffs),
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New YorkJejApIBELLUCK & BOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiff
Jor ox, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By: cDan Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fif th Avei lufe, 4th FloorNew York, NfeW York 10036(212) 681-1^75
Dated: New York, New York
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
BETTY G. PAINTER, Individually and as Executrix :of the Estate of GEORGE A. PAINTER, Deceased, :
NYCAL
[RECEIVE®JUN 1 4 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index No: 190344/2009
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DDated: New York, New York
JUN 16 2017
Dated: New York, New YorkmBELLUCK ^ FOX, LLJ?
Attorneys far Ph intiffs/
Jordan F
Floorork 10036
546 FiftH Ave^'New YorKr-N^Wj(212) 681-1575
SO ORDERED:
^Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON.perm H.MOULTON
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
FffiCEflVEBJUN 14 2017
-YS SUpREMERCQURT . CIVIL
XBARRY KASVEN as Executor of the Estate of :IRENE KASVEN and NATHAN KASVEN, :Indivdually, :
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
IndexNo: 110879/2008
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :
Defendants. :X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff’scomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New Yo$kMy
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
Bv: ML)
BELLUCKAttorneys f r
Jo ox, Esq.an
e, 4th Floorew York 10036
575
546 FiNew York.(212) 681-
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:Ffon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
X
NYCAL
BARRY KASVEN as Executor of the Estate ofIRENE KASVEN and NATHAN KASVEN,Indivdually,
Index Nos.: 110879/2008
Plaintiff(s),NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,
IAS Part 50Defendants.
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.E
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 ^
Attorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
F I L E DDated: New York, New YorkJUN 1 g 2017
SO ORDERED:
HON.PETER H. MOULTON/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
THEODORE MAJKA,
RICEaw DJUN 14 20 ] 7
NYS SUPREME*^URT crwL
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
Index No: 190054/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, Ney
BELLUCK St F(bX , LLP.;Attorneys for Pli intif
yvYMork17
Jo:d o sq
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: .Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth AveHRh foorNew York, Nei Yofrk 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED: 4irAPeter H. Moulton, J.S^T"HON. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
F i L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S ^WY^FICE
MOTJUOM .M w:* *
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
THEODORE MAJKA,X
NYCAL/ JIJN 14 20 )7 /
Index Nos.: 190054/2009
Plaintiff(s),
-against- :
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :
Defendants. :
X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
BELLUCK &TFOX,Attorneys for Ph inti
Jord ox, Esq.
546 FifthN^viNew York/Ne(212) 681-157
Lth Floorfork 10036
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &RubbepCompany
BY: ODan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York F I L E DJUN 16 2017
SO ORDERED: — —^ j3oiLPetCTlLMouiton^Ts!a ^ COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEHON.PETER H. MOULTON NEW YORK
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
SAMUEL MARTINO and ANGELA MARTINO, :
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 119'
EClEfiWEDJUN 1 4 2017
PART soJ SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Plaintiffs),
against-A.W. CHESTERTON, CO., et al.,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Defendants. ;
X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Companye\
BELLUCK & FOX,Attorneys for Plamtif
(4m
Jord Fd#By:
Cj arfGagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth Avenue;mMFloorNew York, New Yo# 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DSO ORDERED: / y A-—Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
BARBARA MAZER, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of MICHAEL MAZER, JR., Deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
Defendants.
: NYCAL
Index No:190181/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
iOEUVio1 4 2017
CIVIL
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs
complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.Dated: New York, New York
TLBELLUCK$FOX, L/P.Attorneys lpr/Plaint
Jord ox, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: oDan Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth Aye, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DSO ORDERED: /P —/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
MON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
BARBARA MAZER, Individually and as Executrix :of the Estate of MICHAEL MAZER, JR., Deceased, :
NYCAL
Index Nos.: 190181/2010
KQEHVEIDJUN 1 4 2017
NVS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Plaintiff(s),
against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants. :X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
BELLUCK &Attorneys for lai
Jo x, Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By: . .Q.
546 Fifth Aven\», 4th FloorNew York, New^York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
//f!on. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
PHYLLIS “SUE” MELANCON, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of NEAL LOUISMELANCON, Deceased,
Plaintiffs),
against-
NYCAL
G?ECEIVBDJUN 14 2017
. PART 50_ NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No: 190212/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
Defendants. :X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff’scomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
W l f i TLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
BELLUCK/& FOX LLtfAttorneys/for Plafem/ffs/
Jor ox, Esq.
546 Fifth Avey4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
SO ORDERED: COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
PHYLLIS “ SUE” MELANCON, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of NEAL LOUISMELANCON, Deceased,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
NYCAL
[Si©!vl© iI JIM 14 2(|l 7 IIndex Nos.: 190212/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
Defendants. :X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New Yor]
BELLUCKJ& FOX, LL?Attorneys for Plaimttf
ew Yp
Jord Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber-Company
Bv: V dr N
546 Fiflh Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 68 *575
Dated: New York, New York
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
SO ORDERED:/lion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON, PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
F I L E DJUN 16 20/7
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
PENRYN A. NAUMOFF, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of HAROLD NAUMOFF,Deceased,
X
X
Plaintiffs),
-against-
NYCAL
P^SwMSl/ JUN 1 4 2017 /
Index No: 190204/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
Defendants. :X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiff’scomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New Yorkt f l j nBELLUCIC& FO;Attorneysfor Plai
LP.s
Jor ox, Esq.
546 Fifth Avey4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
Bv:GD>— -vDan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DJUN 16
SO ORDERED: ^ A —HON’.PETERf.'Dlt^ON
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
PENRYN A. NAUMOFF, Individually and as :Executrix of the Estate of HAROLD NAUMOFF, :Deceased, :
Plaintiffs),
-against- :
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :
Defendants. :X
NYCAL
l^iOilVE©JUN 1 4 2017
^„ PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index Nos.: 190204/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
hi ,
BELLUCK & FOXjLjAttorneys for Plaintiff /
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &RubbepCompany
By:Jor< fx, Esqr
By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 1Q001(212) 302-2400 F I L E D
JUN 1 6 2017
SO ORDERED:/ Hon. PeterH. Moulton, J.S.C.HON.PETER H.MOULTON
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
BETTY G. PAINTER, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of GEORGE A. PAINTER, Deceased,
Plaintiffs),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
^ECEIJWEDJ U N 1 4 2017
: NYCAL
Index Nos.: 190344/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
NVSSUPREMKURT - CIVIL
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiff’s complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
17BELLUCKAttorneys fdr PI;
LLPntiff
Jord F x q*
4th Floorork 10036
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &RubberXkynpany
By:'an Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fift i AvemNew York, New(212) 68M57^
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:' Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON.PETER a MOULTON
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
DECEIVEDJUN 14 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
EFREN CARBONELL, Individually andas Special Administrator to the Estate ofPUBLIO CARBONELL, Deceased,
Plaintiffs),
Index No: 190452/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON., et al., Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
Defendants. :X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New YorkqtfijrBELLUCK1Attorneys/ fc
& FJpX , LLP.i/p/jiintiffs
x, Esq.Vl?
546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By: -IIXDan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 mm , . _
F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017
SO ORDERED: ^ ~ — -4lon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
EFREN CARBONELL, Individually andas Special Administrator to the Estate ofPUBLIO CARBONELL, Deceased,
BEQEOVEDJUN 1 4 2017
, PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Plaintifffs),
-against-
A.W. CHESTERTON., et al.,
Defendants.
Index Nos.: 190452/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New Yo^k, New York
V7
BELLUCKAttorneys foi
FOX, Pamt
dJi F sq.
e
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Company
By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
546 FifthNew Yor](212) 68
ae,Ath Floorfork 10036
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:4 Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400 F|L E D
JUN 1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONX
DAISY CHABOUDY, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of ROBERT CHABOUDY, Deceased,
NYCALJUN 1 4 2gj7
Index No: 190211/2009
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants. :X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
Dated: New York,
BELLUCK & FpX, LAttorneys for Plaiptiffj
By:
Yo
, Esq.Jord;
546 Fifth Avi/4th FloorNew York, Na^/fork 10036(212) 681-1575
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:/Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
X: NYCAL
• XDAISY CHABOUDY, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of ROBERT CHABOUDY, Deceased,
^EOES¥E~':’
JUN 1 4 2017
Plaintiff(s),
-against-ALFA LAVAL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index NosTl90211/2009
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
• X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
L(c\nLYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubber-Company
BELLUCKt &AttorneysTor
By: .
, LLPntiff
By: _SJorc ar Box, Esq.
546 FiftmAre Lue, 4th FloorNew YorVN^w York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
_F I L E D
JUN 16 2017
SO ORDERED:/ Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :x
ANNE RUTH HELTON, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of JERRY HELTON,
Plaintiff(s),
-against-A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.
: NYCAL
Index Nos.: 190284/2010
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
JUN 1 4 20 J 7
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissingplaintiffs complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed withprejudice and without costs.Dated: New York, New York
BELLUCK & FOX,Attorneys for Plainl
YAx, Esq.or
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &Rubbei CQmpany
Bv: V1 3 - Co546 Fifth/ AyeniLet 4th FloorNew Yot^c/NeW(212) 681-1575
ork 10036
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:fion. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON. PETER H.MOULTON
F I L E DJUN 1 s 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
ANNE RUTH HELTON, Individually and as :Executrix for the Estate of JERRY HELTON, :
Plaintiff(s), :
-against-
NYCAL
pSoevis]/ J U N 1 4 2017 j
Index No: 190284®ee9-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al., :
Defendants. :X
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
i orK,.mBELLUCK & FOXYLJAttorneys for Plaintiffs
ox, Esq.Jo
546 Fifth Are^th FloorNew Yoifc, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
!oBy: _£
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017
SO ORDERED:Hon. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.HON. PETER H. MOULTON
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
BEGEDVEDJUN 1 4 2017
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART
NYCALIAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50 INYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc., n/k/a Rhone Poulenc Ag Company,
n/k/a Bayer Cropscience Inc. (“ Amchem Products, Inc.” ), hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Amchem Products, Inc. with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
, 2017
Cl/arles M/Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yayitz, Esq.DARGEKISRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products,/inc.116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300 F / L E D
SO ORDERED, /7/*Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 1 6 2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JUN 1 4 2017
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to: Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002
DONALD E. STEWART SR and FALYNSTEWART
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York\ . 2017
Charles WFerguson, Esq.
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK JUN 1 4 2017IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONNYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
This Document Relates to: Index No: 115822/2001
MILES R. PEDERSEN NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Charles htyferguson, 4.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A IDARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
i toral
F I L E DSO ORDERED, JUN 1 6 2017
HON. PETER H.MOULTONHon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART
NYCALI A S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IREOE1VEDJUN 14 2017
PART $0NYS S'J°REMF_ COURT - CIVIL
Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in
the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against defendant Dana Companies, LLC with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Dana Companies, LLC be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Dated: New York, New York
^ , 2017
Charles Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. YavitzA&q. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZf & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Dana Companies, ELC116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor fNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,
^Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017
C0UNnK» ZSK°FF'*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DONALD E. STEWART SR. and FALYNSTEWART
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IREOEIWEDJUN 14 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index Nos: 110268/2002 & 125709/2002
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and
there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkj
S 2017
YlUffAAJUCj/arles KlJFerguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
SO ORDERED,
Judith A. YavitzyDARGER EIUJANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
7 ^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F , L E D1 $ 2017
cou^zi°
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
KCEtiWED14 2017
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
CIVIL
Index No: 125273-00NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Amchem Products, Inc. n/k/a Rhone Poulenc Ag Company, n/k/a Bayer
Cropscience Inc. (“ Amchem Products, Inc/’), hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled
case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
defendant Amchem Products, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Amchem Products, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
jvyvfc ^ 2017
ChariesVM. Ferguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yavitz, E&f. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZI & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Amchem Products, pc.116 East 27th Street, 12th Floor lNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,^ Hon. Peter H. Moulton t
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
F I L E DJUN 1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
RECEIVEDJUN 14 201?
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No: 125273-00
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant CertainTeed Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
CertainTeed Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
Juftt ^ . 2017
Cnarles Nj/rerguson, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Ya/itz/Esq. 7DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed uorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FldorNew York, NY 10016 {(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED, /i<Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
F,teom 1 6 2017
C°UNTYClt;r,
*£%%***
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
JUN 1 4 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to: Index Nos: 125273-00 & 119390-00STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Dana Companies, LLC, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Dana Companies, LLC, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Dana Companies, LLC, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
9 2017, 2017
WEITZ LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Chiles Nf. Ferguson, Esq. '' v Judith A. YaviWEITZ <sLUXENBERG, P.C. DARGER EH AU LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs Attorneys for 1700 Broadway 116 East 27* 5New York, NY 10003 New York, NY 10016(212) 558-5500 (212) 452-5300
HON. PETER H. MQULTON COt^
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to: Index No: 125273-00
STEVEN E. BLAIR, as Executor for the Estate ofSTANLEY BLAIR
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation, hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint
against defendant Union Carbide Corporation, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
, 2017
WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiffs700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003(212) 558-5500
Judith A. Yav(t£< Esq. /DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLP
r(t£< Esq. JAttorneys for Union CarbiddCorporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERE
HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.L.
Hon. Peter H. Moulton
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
DAVID PAROUSE, as Administrator of the Estate ofCHARLES SULLIVAN, Deceased
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IBICSWIOII J U N 1 4 20 I 7 j
Index No: 190105/2011
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New Yorkf
, 2017
rCo,5 <3 Avv/NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 397-1000
Jonathan B^?romberg, Esq.DARGEtfTRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,( ' Hon. Peter H. Moulton'""' ^ 6 2017
HON. PETER H.MOULTON COUNTY CLB^OJ.S.C. NEWYORK0FFI
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
PATRICIA POWELL and RONALD E. POWELL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
HEOEDVIDJUN 1 4 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No: 190198/2010
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant Union Carbide Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant Union Carbide Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
Union Carbide Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
C71+ f, 2017
(fL-g-J1NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 1 F’1 FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 397-1000
Jonathan B^Kromberg, Esq.DARGER ERRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for Union Carbide Corporation116 East 27,h Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter H. Moulton
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORKIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CAROL BRADY-ROSE AND VINCENT ROSE
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
REOEIWEDJUN 1 4 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No: 10-190420
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant CertainTeed Corporation hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant CertainTeed Corporation with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against defendant
CertainTeed Corporation be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
Dated: New York, New York
^ . 2017
C-O -NAPOLI SHKOLNIK, PLLCAttorneys for Plaintiffs360 Lexington Avenue, 11 th FloorNew York, NY 10017(212) 397-1000
Jonathan B^Kromberg, Esq.DARGERTRRANTE YAVITZ & BLAU LLPAttorneys for CertainTeed Corporation116 East 27th Street, 12th FloorNew York, NY 10016(212) 452-5300
F I L E DSO ORDERED,
~C Hon. Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
V
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
STEPHEN D. HALL AND JOAN C. HALL
against
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY)
IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 01-122295
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, KOHLER CO., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, KOHLER CO., with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, KOHLER CO., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
DATED: 5~ )l~ 17New York, New York
*
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
- <^QrrHRI DEWIT, ESQ. .EBANK-QRTIZ, ESQ., ESQ^frar ]SHAZIA CHAUDHRI DEWIT, ESQ.
HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,KOHLER CO.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
JLRANK-QRTIZ, ESQ., ESQWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. F rSUSCAAttorneys for Plaintiffs), Q pcAStephen D. Hall and Joan C. Hall ^ ‘700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:Honorable PeterhJ. Wpuljoifo *rf)W
HON. PET r
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EDWARD BENDERSKI
against
A.C. AND S„INC. (ARMSTRONGCONTRACTING & SUPPLY)
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 99-106277
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs./7 3 8'ODATED: U&w York
Z25JASMIN R. GfOSNELL, ESQ.HOAGtAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST &JDOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
-MATTHEW MACINTYfrg-ESQ.WEITZ & LUXENBERG ^had SAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Edward Benderski (J700 Broadway, New York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
$\1
00<S^
udge Moulton
'dm
, %
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
46 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
VIRGINIA S.FLOOD, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of RICHARD C.FLOOD, deceased,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 106562/07
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.DATED: New Brunswick,NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
SO ORDERED: *\V
JORDAM/E0X, ESQ.BELLUICKO FOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Virginia S. Flood, Individually and as Executrixof the Estate of Richard C. Flood, deceased546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036
l
0°,#vHonorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PfcffcftU
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
BARBARA MAZER, Individually and asExecutrix for the Estate of MICHAEL MAZER,JR., deceased,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS COMPANY,et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 190181/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company,, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
<
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with pr^jLjaicejand/Without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company^48 Wall Street, Suite 1100 ^New York, New YodOQOOt v* ^
\ ^
JORDAftLCTBOX, ESQ.BELLUOK &TOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Barbara Mazer, Individually and as Executrixfor the Estate of Michael Mazer, Jr., deceased546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036
SO ORDERED:S' Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTON7
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 01-111220
PATRICIA MURRAY, as Executrix for theEstate of THOMAS J. MURRAY, andPATRICIA MURRAY, Individually,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
ACandS, INC., et al., |
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DA
JASHODUAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street,Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
Patricia Murray, as Executrix for the Estate ofThomas J. Murray, and Patricia Murray,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
HOAGLAND, LONGO,
SO ORDERED:
jUU 1648 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARK V. SLEVIN, as Executor of the Estate ofPATRICK T. SLEVIN,
against
A.W. CHESTERTON CO., INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 30(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 190406/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary/
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
DATED:New York, NY
j\ /A ^—MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
JOHN-P. GUINAN, ESQ.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Mark V. Slevin, as Executor of the Estate ofPatrick T. Slevin800 Third Ave, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:f \ \-£° 7 Z' I IHonorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SUSAN L. MASONE, as Executrix for theEstate of JOSEPH C. NEMEC, deceased,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 190139/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and withoutcosts.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJGW>
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
e \ \^°SO ORDERED^ » ^•ISM
JORDAN FCBELLUCKf FOX7LLPAttorneys forPlaintiff(s),Susan L. Masone, as Executrix for the Estateof Joseph C. Nemec, deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036
0 'c£
Honorable Peter H. MouRdn ^
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
HI .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
F I L E D1g ;?0J7
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MYRIAM GALEANO, Individually and asProposed Executrix of the Estate of MANUELGALEANO, deceased,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50COUNtY CLERK'S OFF,(Moulton, P.) NEW YORK ^E
INDEX NO.: 190438/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
Company, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudi* ithout costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
nd
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Compaq48 Wall Street, Suite 1100 ^ VNew York, New York 100^V>
HON. PETER H. MOULTON
JORDAN F<JK, ESQ.BELLUCM^FOX, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Myriam Galeano, Individually and as ProposedExecutrix of the Estate of Manuel Galeano,deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4,h FloorNew York, NY 10036
SO ORDERED:Honorable Peter H. Moulton
t
HOAGLAND. LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
F I L E DSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK ig 2Q|7IN RE: NEW YORK CITY
ASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
KATHLEEN KEARNEY, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of DANIEL KEARNEYa/k/a DANIEL T. KEARNEY, deceased,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.) COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORKINDEX NO.: 190004/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation and Frick Company,
hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law
and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International
Corporation and Frick Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation and Frick Company, be and the same are hereby
dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: N^Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation and FrickCompany48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
O Q.
SO ORDERED:*0
JORDAN/
BELLUGK &M)X, LLPAttorneys WrPlaintiff(s),KathleeWearney, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Daniel Kearney a/k/aDaniel T. Kearney, deceased546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036
&Hnnnrahlia FHonorable Peter H. MoultonHON.PETER H.MOULTON
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
This Document Relates to: INDEX NO.: 190284/10
ANNE RUTH HELTON, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of JERRY HILTON,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as
Successor to Frick Company, hereby requests summary judgment in the above-entitled case,
pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
Company, with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, Individually and as Successor to Frick
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation, Individuallyand as Successor to Frick Company48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
Anne Ruth Helton, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Jerry Hilton546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law SO ORDERED:48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
f r Honorable Peter H. MoultonHON,PETER H. MOULTON
J.S.C
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
THEODORE MAJKA,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al„
IAS. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 190054/09
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, York International Corporation, hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, York International Corporation, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, York International Corporation, be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ(^4 [ |Y
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,York International Corporation48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
YJORDAN FJOX, (ESQ.BELLfJCW FOX, LLPAttorrfeys'for Plaintiff,Theodore Majka546 Fifth Ave, 4th FloorNew York, NY 10036
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
ORDERED:
^ \L0' ^
-/ Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONoff"*
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
ESTHER SHEMBERG, INDIVIDUALLY ANDAS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF ZEVSHEMBERG,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., ETAL,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 190221/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc., hereby requests summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc., with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
DATED:New York, New Yorkmil?
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND. LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Johnson Controls, Inc.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York
SO ORDERED:
c.1100* \1^»o\^
NfCHOLAG NOVA-GK, E3Q.LEVY KONIGSBERG, LLPAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Esther Shemberg, Individually and asExecutrix of the Estate of Zev Shemberg800 Third Ave, 11th FloorNew York, NY 10022
Honorable Peter H. Moultonft *.HON.PETER H. MOULTO
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
SIXTO MAYA,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 00-106667
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New,Brunswick, NJ(A* [ 1?
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
JOHN C. DEARIE, ESQ.ILAJN OFFICES OF JOHN C. DEARIE &
5SOCIATESAttorneys for Plaintiff,Sixto Maya3265 Johnson AveRiverdale, NY 10463
SO ORDERED:
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law F I L E D48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
JUNUW7
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE^ NEW YORK
^/ Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MANUEL PEREZ,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)INDEX NO.: 00-116821
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
Sf /^y0HN C. DEARIE, ESQ.
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. DEARIE &ASSOCIATESAttorneys for Plaintiff,Manuel Perez3265 Johnson AvenueRiverdale, NY 10463
SO ORDERED:
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law was ®1
X?— -— -7 Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTON
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
CLEBKS OFF'cE
wmm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MANUEL PEREZ,
against
ACandS, INC., etal.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 05-104674
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED: Ne^ljlrupswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTFgEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
JOHN C. DEARIE, ESQ.LAW OFFICES OF JOHN C. DEARIE &ASSOCIATESAttorneys for Plaintiff,Manuel Perez3265 Johnson AvenueRiverdale, NY 10463
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS. LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:
0FF\cE
Honorable Peter H. MoultonHON. PETER H.BOULTON
J.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
MARK PARENTE, as Administrator for theEstate of ALEXANDER PARENTE, and DORISPARENTE, Individually,
against
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton,P.)
INDEX NO.: 190285/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3-s-n
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTR2EWA, BWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
VVESTDHA3C (J
DAVID -JrDARRVWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Mark Parente, as Administrator for the Estateof Alexander Parente, and Doris Parente,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:
*1^^ Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK STATE
x NYCALIN RE: NEW YORK COUNTY I.A.S. Part 50
ASBESTOS LITIGATIONV
(Judge Moulton)A
BARBARA MAZER, Individually and as Index No.: 190181/10Executrix for the Estate of MICHAEL
JR - |=]LEDiPlaPinTrifts, NO-OPPOSITION
JUN 16SUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
- against -
A.0. SMITH WATER P R O D U C‘D, Y O R K
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil
Practice Law and Rules Section §3212, dismissing plaintiffs'Complaint against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., with prejudice,
and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims
and cross claims against defendant GOULDS PUMPS, INC., be
dismisse/3)with prejudice and without costs.
Dated
JordBelldckAttorneyMichael
NewApr
brk, New York8, 2017
, Esq.3?ox/A<hJsq
Sc /Fox, LLPfor Plaintiffsazer, Jr.
546 Fifth Avenue,New York, NY 10036
4th Floor
yM (f^nd(!aHtudL,Esq.Raghu N. Bandlamudi, Esq.Cullen and Dykman LLPAttorneys for DefendantGoulds Pumps, Inc.44 Wall Street, 15th FloorNew York, New York 10005(212) 732-2000File No.: 6754-10985
So Ordered:• X?^bn7 Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HOM.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
EILEEN GREEN as Executrix for the Estate ofPATRICK J. BRENNAN,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S.Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 119388-00
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3- S-n
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
PRANK ORTIZ, CSQ.'cWEITZ & LUXENBERG ftMUStnAttorneys for Plaintiffs), (JEileen Green as Executrix for the Estate ofPatrick J. Brennan700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
*o ^2=/ ^ Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H, MOULTON
ictmfcs
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
CAROL S. SABIN, as Executrix for the Estateof ANTHONY SABIN, and CAROL S. SABIN,Individually,
against
ACANDS, INC., etal.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 104096/99
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
-FRANK ORTIZ,WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs),Carol S. Sabin, as Executrix for the Estate ofAnthony Sabin, and Carol S. Sabin,Individually700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:
*x*
^Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
wmm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
GEORGE E. ALLEN and JEAN ALLEN,
against
ACandS, INC., etal.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 02-122052
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3' S' f7
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
MONICA R. KOSTRZEWA, ESQ.HOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
FRANK ORTTZTESCb^fl/TfeS'WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PCAttorneys for Plaintiffs,George E. Allen and Jean Allen700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
ICrjJASOn
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:
OHonorable Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.w.
wmm
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN B.EFFINGER and CAROLINEEFFINGER,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 02-105715
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
IWHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.DATED: New ^riv4wick, N1
MONICA R. KOSTRZB VA, EsferJHOAGLAND, LONGO, MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
Charles'DANA M NORTHQWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC fcrtSjUSOTlAttorneys for Plaintiffs, UJohn B. Effinger and Caroline Effinger700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
SO ORDERED:
*O'
Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
#
0o^p
CS-CORT
, KMA53484/legal/nosjm/febniary2014SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XTHOMAS LEAHY and EVELYN LEAHY,
Plaintiff,
BidHVIDJUN 1 5 2017
PART 50NY5 SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
-against-3M COMPANY, et al,;
Index No,: 190162/09
Defendants,j X
WHEREFORE, defendants JOHN CRANE INC. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs1
complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE INC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants KMN CRANE INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Jordan iFoxJAttorney for Pl&int|Bellucl^rTm546 Fifth AvenueNew York, New York 10036
Jos^plfEfig^egorio, Esq.Forneys for DefendantJohn Crane Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
» »M
*
KMA54675/)cgaVnosjmSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XEFREN CARBONELL, Individually and asSpecial Administrator to the Estate of PUBLIOCARBONELL SOTO, Deceased,
Plaintiff,
RECEIVEDJUN 15 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 190452/10
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION
-against-A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ET AL,
Defendants.X
WHEREFORE, defendants JOHN CRANE INC. hereby request summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs'
complaint against defendants JOHN CRANE INC with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants JOHN CRANE INC. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without
costs.
Jordan ]Belluck546 Fifth .New Yoric,[New York 10036
Joseph Digregorio, Esq.Dmeys for Defendant
John Crane Inc.Barry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED, — -Hon. Peter Moulton
HON.PETER H.MOULTONF I L E D
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
X:LUM/SS670Jleeamn.<;JM/MA ¥ 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
-XPEGGY JANE SMITH, Individually and as ExecutrixOf the Estate of DANA “ GENE” SMITH, deceased,
Plaintiff(s),
IREOEOWEDJUN 1 5 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NO OPPOSITION SUMMARYJUDGMENT MOTION ANDORDER
against - Index No.: 190211/11
84 LUMBER COMPANY, et al.;
Defendants.X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 30
WHEREFORE, defendants 84 LUMBER COMPANY hereby request summary judgment
in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs' complaint against defendants 84 LUMBER COMPANY with prejudice, and there being
no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
defendants 84 LUMBER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and
without costs.
ffsJordan Fox, ]Attorney fqrjBelluck & Fc546 Fifth A^nueNew York, New York 10036
^G^^OVBrian Feld, Esq.
^ Attorneys for 84 LUMBER COMPANYBarry McTieman & Moore2 Rector Street, 14th FloorNew York, New York 10006(212) 313-3600
SO ORDERED,Hon. Peter Moulton
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY :
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
KENNETH H. TODD, as Executor of the Estate of :VICTOR ALFRED TODD, Deceased, :
NYCAL
Index No: 109984/2008
RECEmE©1 4 2017
NYS SUPREMECOURT crviL
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.,
Defendants.Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summaryjudgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffscomplaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no oppositionthereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
BELLUCK & FOX,UJ.Attorneys for Plaintiff/
Jordan Foxj Esa.
546 Fifth Ave, 4t] t FloorNew York, New(212) 681-1575
>rk 10036
Dated: New York, New York
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
BVCIX- — yDan Gagliardi, Esq.
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DSO ORDERED:
JUN 16 2017
MSlRKtiSSuTONj.s.c.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
IN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This Document Relates to:
JOHN B. EFFINGER and CAROLINEEFFINGER,
against
ACandS, INC., et al.,
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
INDEX NO.: 02-110212
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
r
WHEREFORE, defendant, Kohler Co., hereby requests summary judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’
complaint against defendant, Kohler Co., with prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
/
defendant, Kohler Co., be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs.3 -8 -17
DATED: New Brunswick, NJ
\-w vMt&fllGA R. KOsfk^BWA, ESQJHOAfil ANn lONfinlMORAMHOAGLAND, LONGO,‘MORANDUNST & DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys for Defendant,Kohler Co.48 Wall Street, Suite 1100New York, New York 10005
iRA&ViSQr^DANA M. NORTHCRAFT, ESCWEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC fcsGUSOnAttorneys for Plaintiffs, UJohn B. Effinger and Caroline Effinger700 BroadwayNew York, NY 10003
SO ORDERED:
HOAGLAND, LONGO,MORAN, DUNST& DOUKAS, LLPAttorneys at Law
48 Wall StreetSuite 1100New York, NY
Honorable Peter H. Moulton
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK CS-CURT-19
JAN 1 8 2017SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 50
NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILX NYCAL —I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
-XThis document relates to: Index No.: 106999/2002
RAYMOND JOSEPH JABLONSKI,
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
-against-
Defendant.
Plaintiff,
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
-X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
HON.PETER H.MOULT°NJ.S.C COUNTY CLi
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
tpfeiwiSI1 m 18 »17 I
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
1 PART 50 t
(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 106580/2002113244/2002
DAVE JAMES (DEC.),
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: fj f\Harrison, New York If ) f\
Charts RrCMWtfEM .WEITZ & LUXENBHRG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell 'S Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN,/LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED: F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
X
X
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
JSICWED ]I JAN 1 8 2017 I[ NYS. SUPREME COURT - gvn j
Index No.: 104103/02,120392/01
RICHARD L. BOSSEY and JANE BOSSEY,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.- X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. f\ (1Dated: /'3"/7
Harrison, New York
~
Charles FerguSWesa.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S Jamison, E?qMARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for Defendant
&
KEELER/DORR-OIJVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETEB H.MOULTON
F I L E D1 6 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFF/CPNEW YORK E
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
IBEOEOWEDJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index No.: 106706/2002114870/2002
JOHN W. MAHNKEN (DEC.),
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs' complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: I " 3 -' llHarrison, New York
& — *
ChQH-fl pfn5|Ui^, {Tsa .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. ^Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED.
f \
VRussell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
— XThis document relates to:
NYCALI.A.S. Part 5&(Moulton, P.)
[REOiBVEOJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT * CIVIL
Index No.: 110054/2002105875/2002
RONALD S. TANNER ,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: / "3— / ~7
Harrison-New 1fork
tt~ChGrt -ef Rrmsovh
WEITZ & LUXENBBRG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russen S Jamison, Esq. \MARIN GOODMAN, iiLR.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ,S.Cc
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
— XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
- XThis document relates to:
IRECEWEBJAN 1 8 20 W
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 106808/2002110586/2002
EDWARD LAZORE,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: ( *"
Harrison, New York
ftra\ASQY\^q .rEITZ & LUXENBgRG, P.C. 1
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
\Y —Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLAttorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DFfonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
^PETEB H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
RECEIVEDJAN 1 8 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIV
Index No.: 106457/2002
GEORGE A. WALKER SR.,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.— X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.
Dated: /'3 - 1 1Harrison, New York — -
£klflrl*J PcrmhnlEsq .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
Russell S Jamison, Esq. |MARIN GOODMAN, LlAttorneys for DefendantvKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E DHopdfable Peter H. Moulton, J.SG
NON. PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C,
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
FEDERICO FOCELLA and JOSEPHINE FOCELLA,
Plaintiff,
-against-KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al
Defendant.X
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: /'3'/ "7Harrison, New York — -
~C\mrWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 118978/2002106695/2002
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
BiCEflViOJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYg SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
SO ORDERED:
honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
F I L E DJUN l 6 20J7
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENBVYORK CE
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
This document relates to:
X
X
IREOEWiDJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCAL l— —I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 107006/02,117982/02
GARY FARNHAM,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIYER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated: /-3~/7
HarriseiTr'New York
Cl/ia A-cs ft rf[ uson; esq .WEITZ & LUXENRERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
J Lkl )!LRussel S Jamison, Esq./ 1MARIN GOODMAN, LDP.Attorneys for Defendant !KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED: F I L E D2.
H^norablePeterH. Moulton, J.S.C
HON, PETER H. MOULTOi,J.S.C.
JUN 16 2017COUNTY CLERK'SOFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
x NYCALI.A.S. Part 50
1ECEWEDJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
In Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
V(Moulton, P.)
This document relates to: Index No.: 101479/02
EDMUND R. EMMA (DEC.),NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY
Plaintiff, JUDGMENTMOTION AND
-against- ORDER AS TODEFENDANT
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al. KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER
Defendant.x
COMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.Dated:
Harrison, New York
C Kories FtrtiASWrE&t .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
Russell S Jamison, Esq. / IMARIN GOODMAN, LLRAttorneys for DefendantX IKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED: F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C JUN 16 ZM7
HON.PETER H. MOULTONJ,S,C. COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE
NEW YORK
I
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
- XThis document relates to:
[RECEOWEDJAN 1 8 2017
NYCAT pART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVILI.A.S. Part*50 — —
(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 114898/02
JOAN BO, as Personal Representative for the Estate ofED K. BO, and JOAN BO, Individually,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.x
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: / "3"/?Harrison, New York
Gkarlzi EM.WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.CLAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
0LP.
4tER BOILER
Russelll S Jamison,MARIN GOODMANAttorneys for DefenKEELER/DORR-OLCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-11£ l L E D
JUN 1 6 2017ffonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S.C.
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
[REOEBWIDJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 117991/2002107006/2002
JOHN J. HUDSON,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.— - X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs.Dated: l~3 '/"?
Harrison, New York
Cfaari-eS ftrauWi, esqWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. 1
Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
/
Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLf .|Attorneys for DefendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151F I L E D
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
"ON.PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 16
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICEc NEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
ALBERT HIDALGO,
BESEDWEID)
JAN 18 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS.SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 101105/2002120432/2001
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.- X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, with
prejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendant
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated:. /'3-/7Harrison, New York
SOrTIfsa .Chari-eJ Ferguson, essf .WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
RusselUS Jamison, EsqMARIN GOODMAN, LLf .Attorneys for DefendanKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED: F I L E DHonorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON,PETER H.MOULTONJ.S.C.
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
!
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
NYCAL
IREOEIWEDJAN 18 2017
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
I.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
Index No.: 103452/2002
PATRICK MYERS,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requests
summary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,
dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice
and without costs. A
Dated: /"3'/7 I /1 (\Harrison-New York
ftnaujOHWEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C. IAttorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
SO ORDERED:
Russell S Jamison, Esq.MARIN GOODMAN, LLP.Attorneys for DefendantsKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
F I L E D
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON. PETER H. MOULTON
JUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
— -XIn Re NEW YORK COUNTYASBESTOS LITIGATION
XThis document relates to:
BICEIIVEDJAN 1 8 2017
NYCALI.A.S. Part 50(Moulton, P.)
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Index No.: 102837/2002
JOHN J. O’BRIEN,
Plaintiff,
-against-
KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, et al.
Defendant.X
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARYJUDGMENTMOTION ANDORDER AS TODEFENDANTKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY
WHEREFORE, defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3212,dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint against defendant KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, withprejudice, and there being no opposition thereto.
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross-claims against defendantKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudiceand without costs.
Dated: I ~ 3 /”7— , HarrfOTrS^ew York
rUftrlfS hrqulon, £s?WEITZ & LUXENBERG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003(212)558-5500
/
Russell S Jamison, Esjq.MARIN GOODMANYLLP.Attorneys for DefendahKEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILERCOMPANY500 Mamaroneck Ave, Suite 501Harrison, New York 10528(212) 661-1151
SO ORDERED:
Honorable Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C
HON.PETER H.MOULTON
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
xEDWARD BORST and PATRICIA BORST, :
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
NYCAL
Index Nos.: lyoz^o/ n
Plaintiff(s),
-against-NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al.,
Defendants. Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
•X
WHEREFORE, defendant The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company hereby requestssummary judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs’ complaint against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company with prejudice, andthere being no opposition thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claimsagainst The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company be and the same are hereby dismissed with
prejudice and without costs.Dated: New York. New York
Attorneys for Defendant The Goodyear Tire &LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP
Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth Avenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
Dated: New York, New York
HON. PETER H. MOULTON
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
XIN RE: NEW YORK CITY : NYCAL
ASBESTOS LITIGATION :X
EDWARD BORST and PATRICIA BORST,
JUN 1 4 jmv*. pART SO JNYS SUPREME COURT .^ j
Plaintiff(s),
-against-
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, et al,
Defendants.
Index Nos.: 190296/11
NO OPPOSITIONSUMMARY JUDGMENTMOTION AND ORDER
Hon. Peter H. Moulton,IAS Part 50
— X
WHEREFORE, defendant Goodyear Canada Inc. hereby requests summary
judgment in the above-entitled case, pursuant to CPLR 3212, dismissing plaintiffs’complaint against Goodyear Canada Inc. with prejudice, and there being no opposition
thereto, it is hereby:
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims
against Goodyear Canada Inc. be and the same are hereby dismissed with prejudice andwithout costs.Dated: New York, New York
U7
BELLUCAttorneys
F LBlao
rd Fo ; Esq.
LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLPAttorneys for Defendant Goodyear Canada Inc.
By:Dan Gagliardi, Esq.
546 Fifth^yenue, 4th FloorNew York, New York 10036(212) 681-1575
Dated: New York, New York
SO ORDERED:iW. Peter H. Moulton, J.S.C.
HON. PETER H. MOULTONJ.S-G-
137 West 25th Street, 5th FloorNew York, New York 10001(212) 302-2400
F I L E DJUN 16 2017
COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICENEW YORK
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCOUNTY OF NEW YORK
xIN RE: NEW YORK CITYASBESTOS LITIGATION
x Index No.: 190208/2011DAMIANO P.LOMONACO,
RECEIVEDNOV 2 3 2016
PART 50NYS SUPREME COURT - CIVIL
Plaintiffs), NO OPPOSITION-against- SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOTION AND ORDER
A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS CO., et al.
Defendants.x
WHEREFORE, Defendant BW/IP, Inc., hereby requests Summary Judgment in the
above-entitled case, pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules Sections 3212, dismissing
plaintiffs complaint against Defendant BW/IP, Inc., with prejudice, and there being no
opposition thereto,
ORDERED, that upon notice to all co-defendants, all claims and cross claims against
Defendant, BW/IP, Inc., be and the same are hen
to either party.
Dated: New York, New York
dismissed with prejudice and without costs
y
O'
Adam Dreksler, Esq.WEITZ & LUXENBURG, P.C.Attorneys for Plaintiff700 BroadwayNew York, New York 10003
Nicole G. IVTarkoN^itz, Esq.SEGAL McCAMBRIDGE SINGER &MAHONEY, LTD.Attorneys for Defendant850 Third Avenue, Suite 1100New York, New York 10022
SO
J.S.C.