games in 2006. games (and play) and science communication what we can learn from games and how we...

Post on 13-Dec-2015

216 Views

Category:

Documents

3 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

Games in 2006

Games (and play) andscience communication

What we can learn from games and

how we might even use games

to communicate science

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 3

Outline

• Why games?

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 4

Why games?

1Successful games are

free choice activitiesthat can

attract and hold

participants’ attention.

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 5

Why games?

2Rules, play, culture;

Games can create the contexts

that influence learning.

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 6

Eight Key Factorsthat influence Learning1

Personal context1. Motivation and expectations2. Prior knowledge, interests, and beliefs3. Choice and control

Sociocultural context4. Within-group sociocultural mediation5. Facilitated mediation by others

Physical context6. Advance organizers7. Design8. Reinforcing events and experiences outside the

museum1: Learning from Museums,Falk and Dierking, 2000, p.148

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 7

Why games?

3Games are about learning.

“Fun from games arises out of mastery. It arises out of comprehension. It is the act of solving puzzles

that makes games fun.

In other words, with games, learning is the drug.”

(Koster, 2005, p.40)

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 8

Why games?

4Games have deep structure.

“…these eight factors (Why games? #2) help us know more about () how visitors learn;

they tell us relatively little about what visitors learn.”

Falk and Dierking, 2000, p.149

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 9

Deep structure

‘real’ system

• in a state

action

• new state

shallow representation

• representation of state

deep representation

• representation of state

representation of action

• representation of new state

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 10

Deep Structure range

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 11

1. Meaningful play

• descriptive analysis:– factual definition of what happens in game– player action relates to system response

• evaluative analysis:– judging effectiveness of action-response to

create emotional experience– discernable – responses are apparent to player

(Suchman)– integrated – response has influence on further

play and outcome

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 12

Salen and Zimmerman, p.34

• “Meaningful play occurs when the relationships between actions and outcomes in a game are both discernable and integrated into the larger context of the game. Creating meaningful play is the goal of successful game design.”

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 13

2. Defining Games

• no standard definition• features proposed by

various writers:– rules that limit players– conflict– goal orientation– activity– involves decision-making– absorbing but not serious– not associated with material

gain– artificial / safe

– outside ordinary life– creates social groups– voluntary– uncertainty– make-believe /

representational– inefficient– system of parts,

resources, tokens– art form

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 14

The Magic Circle

• games exist within a magic circle with an explicit boundary– players agree to be in the magic circle – the

lusory attitude – so play can occur– within the circle, rules create special meanings

(for symbols, tokens, actions) that guide play– as a rule system, a game is closed– as a play system, a game is open / closed– as a culture system, a game is open

D Goforth, Jan 26, 2006 15

Sample sites to analyze

• http://www.scienceworld.ca/teachers_outreach/play_online/bw_games.htm

multiple choice game of organs• http://www.poissonrouge.com/puzzler/inde

x.htm kid’s puzzles

• http://www.tryscience.org/grid/offline/offline.html forest file etc

• http://www.exploratorium.edu/hockey/shooting1.html shooting puck

top related