how comfortable can you afford to be? kostas kotsiopoulos
Post on 22-Dec-2015
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
How comfortable can How comfortable can you afford to be?you afford to be?
Kostas KotsiopoulosKostas Kotsiopoulos
AgendaAgenda
OverviewRisk RatingHistorical DataIterative ApproachTime PeriodINFORMER Solutions
OverviewOverview
Pillar OneMinimum Capital Requirements
Pillar TwoSupervisory
Review
StandardisedApproach
IRBApproach
SecuritisationFramework
TradingBook
OperationalRisk
Pillar ThreeMarket
Discipline
Basel II introduce a unique opportunity for banks to evolve their risk methodologies, strategies and technology in order to control and manage credit, market and operational risk in an integrated
way.
The three different approaches The three different approaches for Capital Adequacyfor Capital Adequacy
1. Standardised Approach 2. Foundation Internal Ratings Based
Approach. Five years data, the exception can be 2 years.
3. Advanced Internal Ratings Based Approach. Five years for PD, seven years for LGD and EAD
ImplementingImplementing BASEL II BASEL II SolutionsSolutions
Bought in dataBalance sheet analysisSector analysisCredit historyEtc..
Risk ComponentsRisk Components
Probability of Default (PD)Loss Given Default (LGD)Exposure at Default (EAD)Based upon the Internal RatingsHow many models are required?Different sectors, different geographies?
Some IssuesSome Issues
Where to source the exposure data?Where to source the mitigant data?Is there common Counterparty
identification?Is there a common way of identifying
internal organisation structures?Can the mitigant data be joined to the
exposure data?Do we have netting arrangements in place?
Mitigation is the KeyMitigation is the Key
Can make a significant difference to the capital charge
Is a sensitive way to manage riskMay be:
– Eligible financial collateral– Approved Guarantees– Eligible Credit Derivatives– Netting
Risk Rating Systems: Risk Rating Systems: PrinciplePrinciple
Rating and risk estimation systems provide a meaningful way of ranking and quantifying risk
This provides a controlled way of categorising Obligor and Facility/transactional risk
The approaches must show a clearly defined and consistent approach to risk assessment, which is systemic in its application within a bank
Rating SystemsRating Systems
All of the methods, processes, controls, data collection and IT systems that support the assessment of credit risk
This in turn leads to the assignment of internal risk ratings and the quantification of loss estimates
This underpins the whole of the BASEL II IRB approaches
Risk RatingRisk Rating Credit Scoring Solution Credit Rating Solution Customer and Transaction Rating Risk Pricing Model Disclosure of the bank’s Information
will affect its own rating (PILLAR 3) Operational Risk Increase Provisions? Increase the Cost of Fund?
Regulatory and Regulatory and Economic CapitalEconomic Capital
• The Pillar 2 wording from The Basel II Accord, makes it very clear that Banks should maintain a buffer over and above the minimum capital requirement
Reasons for the Capital Reasons for the Capital BufferBuffer
For the benefit of a bank’s own rating within the markets
The business mix will require adjustment beyond the capital calculated by the Basel II single factor model
As a reserve to avoid raising capital in poor market conditions
Prudence to avoid getting close to the regulatory capital minimum
The general point about the single factor model and other market correlations
Principle 2Principle 2• “Supervisors should review and
evaluate banks’ internal capital adequacy assessments and strategies, as well as their ability to monitor and ensure their compliance with regulatory capital ratios. Supervisors should take appropriate supervisory action if they are not satisfied with the result of this process”
Historical DataHistorical Data
Availability of data– Efficient and Representative Data– Statistical Analysis
Data Cleansing Consolidation of data Classification of data Is there any requirement for
benchmarks?
Iterative ApproachIterative Approach
Simulations Select the appropriate Approach Combination of Approach Introduce the Appropriate Method
for Internal Rating
TimetableTimetable
Basel II is confirmed and the timelines will not slip, and not only for G10
National supervisors steadfast on deadlines Parallel run commencing 2006 Final going in position by 2007
The absolute minimum expectation is that banks should be able to implement the Standardised Approach by January 1 2007
“Dry run” by mid 2006 latest Consultation with supervisor by end 2005 latest Commence programs for change (2nd Iteration) by mid
2005 latest
Applying of the new framework in EE
End 2005 End 2006 End 2007 End 2008 Standardised/ IRBF
Parallel Run 95% 90% 80%
IRBA Parallel Run ---- 90% 80%
Test and Parallel Run by the end of 2005
End 2006 Standardised and IRBF
End 2007 IRBA
The banks that will choose the IRBA are able to remain at the current framework during 2007.
Basel II Accord – Basel II Accord – ChallengesChallenges
The task of implementing Basel II can be separated into the following challenges
Comprehending the type and format of data you need for Basel II
Consolidating, Standardising and Translating this data before it is usable for any Risk Calculations
Auditing, Validating and Correcting the End-to-End Credit Risk Management Process
Managing the evolution of Basel II compliance BIS level – Basel III National Supervisor Business or product evolution
INFORMERINFORMER
Extensive Experience in Banking Projects (Core banking, e-banking, Outsourcing, etc.)
Vision of the Company is to offer Integrated Solutions to the Financial Sector
Building up the Competence of our personnel and partnership with specialised companies
A dedicated team for these projects
INFORMER’S INFORMER’S SOLUTIONSSOLUTIONS
Consulting Services (Training, Gap Analysis) Data Cleansing, Consolidation and
Classification Interfaces with specialised solutions Credit Scoring and Rating Applications
complementary to Core Banking Systems (T24, Retail 24)
Specialised Solutions like Barracuda of TLC Hardware Solutions Software Solutions
FAQs – Why start now?FAQs – Why start now?Time to define your migration path to compliance and beyond
Correcting data and disparate legacy databases has business wide impact – it needs careful planning and time to test
Buy-in to process and procedure change is critical – allow time for change management
Set achievable iterations of improvement – understand and communicate the results
Impress the regulator with a clear picture of where you are and where you are going
Derive maximum pillar 1 value by focussing on “heat maps” of product and unit mix
Gain early competitive advantage Reduce the risk of a penalty rate
RUNNING BEHIND SCHEDULE?
Operational RiskOperational Risk
"Defining and quantifying operational risk metrics that are tailored to individual lines of businesses will be a major challenge. Firms need to create the proper incentives so that management and other stakeholders not only develop the correct initial approach, but also ensure it incorporates the concept of continuous process improvement,“
Source: CELENT
THANK YOU FOR YOUR THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTIONATTENTION
top related