mapping manual final urdu
Post on 16-Dec-2016
224 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
Printe
d a
t: 7
86
Pri
nte
rs, Is
lam
abad
-
Canadian InternationalDevelopment Agency
Agence canadienne dedveloppement international
FIELD OPERATIONS &
MONITORING MANUAL
MappingMappingMapping
HIV/AIDS SURVEILLANCE PROJECTNATIONAL AIDS CONTROL PROGRAM
2008
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Low-Level HIV Prevalence has not consistently exceeded 5% in any defined subpopulation
and in 50% in atleast one defined subpopulation and
is 1% in pregnant women.
-
To collate, analyze and disseminate accurate information on the prevalence of key risk behaviours and of HIV in selected vulnerable groups in order to guide the development of prevenation and care programmes and policies in pakisan.
Project Goal
Project Objectives
1. To conduct geographic mapping of MSW, Hijra, FSWs. IDUs in selected sites.
2. To draw a representative sample of MSWs, FSWs, Hijra, IDUs in selected sites for the conduct of integrated behavioural and biological surveillance.
3. To collect socio demographic and behavioural information and Dried blood spot specimens from selected sample of MSWs, Hijra, FSWs and IDUs in selected sites.
4. To collect venous blood from a sample of FSWs and Hijra in two sites (Karachi and Lahore) to assess the prevalence of current syphilies.
5. To analyze integrated behavioural and biological data and disseminate it to policy makers and other stake holders.
87
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40
Title Page
Copyrights page / Contact Information Contributors and Writers
Acknowledgments Table of Contents
List of Abbr eviatuins Used Executive Summary
HIV Situation in Pakistan Introduction of HASP & SGS
Introduction & Rationale of the Study Study Objecti ves
Introduction
Study Design, Settings Procedures and Methodology Data Management & Analysis
Monitoring Quality Assurance
Methodology
Description of HRA in each Zone Description of HRA by each Group
Description of HRA by Typology Estimates of HRG by Typology
Zonal Maps Spot Maps
Results
Key Points Recommendations
Limitations and Strengths of the Study
Conclusion
References
References & Appendices
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
-
48
-
49
-
50
-
51
-
52
-
53
-
54
-
ANNEXURES
-
Annex 1.
Some of the key terms that need to be defined include:
High risk activity (HRA) refers to: Commercial sex work performed by both FSW as well as MSW/ESW. Injecting behavior of Injection drug user - IDU.
Seeking risk: Searching for clients (FSW's), purchasing drugs (IDU) or searching for partners (MSW's/hijras).
Taking risk: engaging in sex (commercial sex work) or taking drugs (IDU).
Prevalence: the presence of HRA at a given place.
Estimates: the reported number of participants engaging in HRA.
Work place congregations: places where HRA participants gather in large numbers.
Fluctuations: the increase or decrease in the number of HRA at a given place.
Network operators: persons who facilitate operations of HRA.
Spots: may be defined as a specific point within the geographical area, where the HRA takes place. This spot is likely to be identifiable with a specific postal address.
LIST OF KEY TERMS TO BE DEFINED
56
-
Annex 2.
Form No:
CANADA-PAKISTAN HIV/AIDS SURVEILL ANCE PROJECTWITH NATIONAL/PROVINCIAL AIDS CONTROL PROGRAMME
Round 1 (2005-06)
LEVEL 1 Form
DATE:/ /
Time Start: Hrs min
Time Completion:Hrs min
CITY: _____________________ U/C:___________________ ZONE : _________
FW ID : ____________________ FW Signature : ___________________________
FS ID : _____________________ FS Signature : ___________________________
KI No: __________________________________________________
KI Name: ________________________________________________
Contact Information: _______________________________________
________________________________________________________
Type: ___________________________________________________
Gender: _________________________________________________
Education: _______________________________________________
Profession: _______________________________________________
S.No. Name of Spot # of IDUs # of MSWs
# of FSWs
Street Other Street Brothel Other1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.
- -
Observational Data
57
-
Annex 3.
WORK SHEET
S.No SPOT NAME FREQ OF
MENTION
IDUs MSWs FSWs
58
-
Annex 4.
TABLE A
59
-
Annex 5.
TABLE B
60
-
Annex 6.
LEVEL TWO (a) FORM
61
-
Annex 7.
LEVEL TWO (b) FORM
62
-
Annex 8.
LEVEL TWO (c) FORM
63
-
Annexure-9
MF -M1
Team Evaluation Form
Form Number:
Date:
Form Filled by:
Signature :
No of Zones:
No of Teams:
Please tick (?):
# of Study Coordinator
# of Site Supervisors
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Please write exact number:
Number of team Supervisors
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Number of data collectors Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Social Mobilizers recruited :
Injection drug users Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Female Sex Workers Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Male Sex workers Site 1 Site 2 Site 3
Hijras
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Other staff recruited
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3 e.g., Pimps, Aunties,
Gurus etc.,
Number of Data Management Staff:
Is Data Entry taking place at a central place?
Y/N
MF-M1
Recommendations:
64
-
Annexure-10
MF -M2
Training Evaluation Form
Form Number:
Date:
Form Filled by:
Signature:
Training Name:
No of Days:
Place:
No of Participants:
No. of Resource Persons:
Training Objectives:
Names & Qualifications of the Master trainers:
S. No.
Name of Master trainer
Qualification
Topics covered:
MF-M2
65
-
Training Evaluation Form
Any field work conducted during training?
Yes/No
If Yes, explain how many teams were made?
What was the composition of teams? __________________________________________________
How many locations were visited? ____________________________________________________
How many interviews were conducted by each team? ______________________ _______________
Who were the respondents? _________________________________________________________
Was the data from field collated in one group or teams did it separately?
In group
By teams
What problems were faced in data collection and collation?
1- ______________________________________________________________
2- ______________________________________________________________
3- ______________________________________________________________
4- ______________________________________________________________
3- ______________________________________________________________
Recommendations:
66
-
Annexure-11
MF -M3Interviewer Evaluation Form
Form Number :
Date:
City: ____________________
UC:____________________
Zone: ____________________ __
Location: __________________
Name of Field worker: _________________ Gender: M / F
Age: ________ yrs
Education: ____________
Profession: __________________
Form Filled by:
Signature:
1- Duration of Interview:
______ hrs _____ min
2-
Please rate the interviewer on following on a scale of 1 to 5. Please tick (?)
Very Poor
Poor
Satisfactory
Good
Very Good
Mode of approaching respondent
1
2
3
4
5
Introduction of Project 1 2 3 4 5
Rapport building 1 2 3 4 5
Ability to answer respondent questions
1 2 3 4 5
Writing Eligibility
1
2
3
4
5
Quality of Information
1
2
3
4
5
Overall Interviewing
1
2
3
4
5
3-
Interviewer explained the data confidentiality to respondent properly:
Yes
No
4-
Interviewer took notice of the respondents body language:
Yes
No
5-
Interviewer kept ethical considerations in view while interviewing:
Yes
No
Comments/Observations:
67
-
Annexure-12
MF -M4
Supervisors Daily
Log
Form Number:
Date:
City: ____________________
Zone: __________________
Form Filled by:
Signature:
Please write exact numbers:
No. of Locations Planned:
No. of Locations Covered:
No. of Interviews Planned:
No. of Interviews completed:
No. of Spots validated by supervisor:
No. of interviews accompanied/observed by supervisor:
Questionnaires field edited: Yes No
Edited forms submitted to DMU: Yes No
No. of interviews verified:
No. of interviews cross checked:
Field Editing of filled Forms done:
Yes
No
No of monitoring visits by supervisor:
Meeting 1 held on time:
Yes
No
Presence of Field team in meeting:
Complete
Partial
Meeting 2 held on time:
Yes
No
Presence of Field team in meeting:
Complete
Partial
MF-M4
Comments/Observations:
68
top related