mid-cycle review (mcr) & library review
Post on 24-Feb-2016
35 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Mid-cycle Review (MCR)
& Library Review
Develop Framewor
k
Library Self Study
Strategic Directions
Review Process
External Review &
Report
Final Report to Provost & Associate Provost,
Resources
Library Review
July -Sept 2011
Oct 2011 – Feb 2012
March - June
Summer 2012
Fall 2012
Overall approach
• Engaged• Open• Iterative• Evolving• Listening• Synthesizing• Strategic & forward looking
Change 1.0 & 2.0
“…What happens to learning as we move from the comparative stability of the twentieth century to a more fluid and dynamic new century, where technological innovation is inciting almost constant change?”
Campus context
• Mid-Cycle Review (MCR)• Foundational pillars• MCR - 3 key strategic goals
• Campus narrative & story
• “Life cycle” planning• Accountabilities framework
• Annual planning & priorities process• Aligning our resources with our
strategic directions• Integrating with campus directions &
plans
The Library Review sets the stage for:
Campus Consultation Document
• MCR 3 key goals• Mid-Cycle Review foundational pillars• 5 Life Cycle planning working groups • Library Mission Statement - redraft• Ongoing engagement & consultation
Feedback – who we heard from
• Executive Council members• Deans• Department heads• Faculty, students and staff• Four ARL and CARL University Librarians
Feedback – what we heard• Our four strategic directions resonate• A focus on all four strategic areas is important• Alignment of Library’s strategic directions with the
University’s MCR key goals is very good to see• Partnerships are key, e.g. in “online learning”• Our mission statement still needs work• Some things need clarification• Extent of engagement in Library Review is excellent• Ongoing engagement & communication are critical
Frameworks
• Strategic• Operational• Organizational• Accountability / assessment
Moving forward
• Implementation issues• Annual planning & priority setting• Priority setting
• Framework for prioritizing• Strategic directions as touch-stones
• Organizational structure issues• Assessment & accountability
framework(s)• Communications framework(s)
Some Next Steps
• The Working Group Reports• 31 recommendations
• Blend of strategic, operational, goals, etc.
• Need to review & prioritize etc.• Create our story – and tell it!• Mission Statement - a crisp revised
version based what we have heard• A succinct one or two pager
Next steps
The report to the Provost will address• Strategic directions & mission statement• Key feedback• Next steps
Time frames/staging/etc.
• AUL, Head Special Collections, Head of Acquisitions, etc.• Things we can do asap, sooner rather than later
Ongoing engagement & listening
• Sallie Ann Keller provided a brief
presentation followed by a question and answer period
Questions
top related