nicholson ch01 new
Post on 10-Apr-2018
227 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
1/45
Intermediate MicroeconomicsIntermediate Microeconomicsand Its Applicationand Its Application
10 th Editionby
Walter Nicholson, Amherst CollegeWalter Nicholson, Amherst CollegeChristopher Snyder, Dartmouth CollegeChristopher Snyder, Dartmouth College
P ower P oint Slide P resentationbyMark KarscigCentral Missouri State University
2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
2/45
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Economic Models
2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
3/45
3
Economics
E conomicsHow societies allocate scarce resourcesamong alternative usesthreequestions:
What to produce
How much to produceWho gets the physical and monetaryproceeds
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
4/45
4
MICRO
ECONO
MICS
How individuals and firms makeeconomic choices among scarceresources
How these choices create markets
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
5/45
5
Economic
Models
Simple theoretical descriptions--captureessentials of how economies work
Real economies too complex to describe inuseful detailM odels are unrealistic, but useful
M aps unrealistic--do not show every house,parking lot, etc. Despite lack of realism, mapsshow overall picture; help us get where we want togo; form mental image
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
6/45
6
Production
Possibility Frontier
Graph showing all possible combinationsof goods produced with fixed resources
Figure 1-1 shows production possibilityfrontier--food and clothing produced per
week At point A, society can produce 10 units of food and 3 units of clothing
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
7/45
7
Amount of food
per weeklbs.
4
10A
B
Amount of clothingper weekarticles of clothing
0 3 12
F IGUR E 1-1: P roduction
P ossibility Frontier
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
8/45
8
Production
Possibility Frontier
At B, society can choose to produce 4 lbs.of food and 12 articles of clothing.Without more resources, points outsideproduction possibilities frontier areunattainable
Resources are scarce; we must chooseamong what we have to work with.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
9/45
9
Production
Possibility Frontier
Simple model illustrates five principlescommon to microeconomic situations:
Scarce ResourcesScarcity expressed as Opportunity costsRising Opportunity Costs
Importance of IncentivesInefficiency costs real resources
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
10/45
10
Scarcity And Opportunity Costs
Opportunity cost:Cost of a good as measured bygoods or services that couldhave been produced using thosescarce resources
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
11/45
11
Opportunity CostE
xampleFigure 1-1: if economy produces one morearticle of clothing beyond 10 at point A,economy can only produce 9.5 lbs. of food, given scarce resources.
Tradeoff (or OPP ORTUNITY COST ) at pt. A: lb food for each article of clothing.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
12/45
12
Amount of food per week (lbs.)
9.510 A
Opportunity cost of clothing = pound of food
Amount of clothing per week (articles)
0 3 4
FIGUR
E1-1:
Production
Possibility Frontier
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
13/45
13
Rising Opportunity Costs
Fig.1-1 also shows that opportunity costof clothing rises so that it is much higher at point B (1 unit of clothing costs 2 lbs.of food ).
Opportunity costs of economic actionnot constant, but vary along PP F
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
14/45
14
Amount of food per week(lbs.)
4 B
Opportunity cost of clothing = 2 poundsof food
2
Amount of clothing per week (articles)0 1213
F IGUR E 1-1: P roduction P ossibility Frontier
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
15/45
15
Amountof food
per week
4
9.5
10A
B
Opportunity cost of clothing = pound of food
Opportunity cost of clothing = 2 poundsof food
2
Amountof clothing
per week0 3 4 1213
F IGUR E 1-1: P roduction P ossibility Frontier
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
16/45
16
Uses of M icroeconomics
Uses of microeconomic analysis vary. Oneuseful way to categorize: by user type:
Individuals making decisions regarding jobs,purchases, and finances;Businesses making decisions regarding productdemand or production costs, or
Governments making policy decisions abouteconomic effects of various proposed or existinglaws and regulations.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
17/45
17
Basic Supply-Demand M odel
M odel describes how sellers and buyersbehavior determines goods priceE conomists hold that market behavior generally explained by relationshipbetween buyers preferences for a good
(demand ) and firms costs involved inbringing that good to market ( supply ).
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
18/45
18
Adam Smith--The Invisible Hand
Adam Smith (1 723 -179 0) saw prices asforce that directed resources into activities
where resources were most valuable.P rices told both consumers and firms theworth of goods.
Smiths somewhat incomplete explanationfor prices: determined by the costs toproduce the goods.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
19/45
19
Adam Smith--the Invisible Hand
In 1 8 th century, labor was primary resource.Thus Smith embraced labor-based theory of prices:
If catching a deer took twice as long as catching abeaver, one deer should trade for two beaver (therelative price of a deer is two beavers ).
Figure 1-2(a ), horizontal line at P* shows that anynumber of deer can be produced without affectingrelative cost
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
20/45
20
P rice(hrs)
P*
Q uantity deer per week
F IGUR E 1-2(a ): Smiths M odel
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
21/45
21
David Ricardo--Diminishing Returns
David Ricardo (1 77 2-1 823 ) believed thatlabor and other costs would rise withproduction level
As new, less fertile, land was cultivated,farming would require more labor for sameyield
Increasing cost argument: now referred toas the Law of Diminishing Returns
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
22/45
22
David Ricardo--Diminishing Returns
Relative price of good could be practicallyany amount, depending upon how much
was produced.P roduction level represented quantity thecountry needed to survive.Figure 1-2(b ): as countrys needsincrease from Q 1 to Q 2, prices increasefrom P 1 to P 2
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
23/45
23
P rice
P 1
Q uantity per weekQ 1
F IGUR E 1-2(b ): Ricardos M odel
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
24/45
24
P rice
P 2
P 1
Q uantity per weekQ 1 Q 2
F IGUR E 1-2(b ): Ricardos M odel
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
25/45
25
P rice
P*
Q uantity per week
(a) Smith model (b) Ricardo model
P rice
P 2
P 1
Q uantity per weekQ 1 Q 2
F IGUR E 1-2: E arly Views of P riceDetermination
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
26/45
26
M arshalls M odel of Supply and Demand
Ricardos model could not explain fall inrelative good prices during nineteenthcentury (industrialization ), so economistsneeded a more general model.E conomists argued that peoples
willingness to pay for a good will declineas they have more of that goodthebeginnings of thinking at the margin .
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
27/45
27
M arshall, Supply and Demand, and the M argin
P eople willing to consume more of goodonly if price drops.Focus of model: on value of last, or marginal , unit purchased
Alfred M arshall (1 84 2-1 924 ) showed howforces of demand and supplys imultaneou s ly determined price.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
28/45
28
M arshall, Supply and Demand, and the M argin
Figure 1- 3 : amount of good purchased per period shown on the horizontal axis; priceof good appears on vertical axis.
Demand curve shows amount of goodpeople want to buy at each price. Negativeslope reflects marginalist principle.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
29/45
29
M arshall, Supply and Demand, and the M argin
Upward-sloping supply curve reflectsincreasing cost of making one more unit of a good as total amount producedincreases.Supply reflects increa s ing marginal costs
and demand reflects decrea s ing marginalutility.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
30/45
3 0
P rice
Demand
Supply
Q uantityper week0
F IGUR E 1-3 : The M arshallSupply-Demand Cross
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
31/45
3 1
M arket E quilibrium
Figure 1- 3 : demand and supply curvesintersect at the market equilibrium pointP* , Q *P* is equilibrium price: price at which
the quantity demanded by a goodsbuyers precisely equals quantity of thatgood supplied by sellers
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
32/45
3 2
P rice Demand Supply
Equilibrium pointP*
Q uantityper week0 Q*
F IGUR E 1-3 : The M arshallSupply-Demand Cross
.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
33/45
33
M arket E quilibrium
Both buyers and sellers are satisfied atthis price--no incentive for either to alter their behavior unless something elsechangesM arshall compared roles of supply and
demand in establishing market equilibriumto two scissor blades working together inorder to make a cut
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
34/45
3 4
Non-equilibrium Outcomes
If an event causes the price to be setabove P* , demanders would wish to buyless than Q, * while suppliers wouldproduce more than Q *.If something causes the price to be set
below P* , demanders would wish to buymore than Q * while suppliers wouldproduce less than Q *.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
35/45
3 5
Change in M arket E quilibrium: IncreasedDemand
Figure 1- 4 peoples demand for goodincreases, as represented by shift of demand curve from D to DNew equilibrium established where
equilibrium price increases to P**
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
36/45
3 6
P riceD S
P*
Q uantityper week0 Q*
F IGUR E 1- 4 : An increase in Demand Alters E quilibrium P rice and Quantity
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
37/45
3 7
P riceD
DS
P*
P**
Q uantityper week0 Q* Q**
F IGUR E 1- 4 : An increase in Demand Alters E quilibrium P rice and Quantity
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
38/45
3 8
Change in M arket E quilibrium:decrease in Supply
Figure 1- 5 : supply curve shifts leftward(towards origin )--reflects decrease insupply because of increased supplier costs (increase in fuel costs )
At new equilibrium price P** , consumers
respond by reducing quantity demandedalong Demand curve D
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
39/45
3 9
P rice
D
S
P*
Q uantityper week
0 Q*
F IGUR E 1- 5 : A shift in Supply AltersE quilibrium P rice and Quantity
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
40/45
4 0
P rice
D
SS
P*
P**
Q uantityper week0
Q** Q*
F IGUR E 1- 5 : Shift in Supply AltersE quilibrium P rice and Quantity
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
41/45
4 1
How E conomists Verify Theoretical M odels
Two methods used:
Testing Assumptions : Verifying economicmodels by examining validity of assumptionsupon which models are based
Testing P redictions : Verifying economicmodels by asking whether models canaccurately predict real-world events
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
42/45
4 2
Testing Assumptions
One approach: determine whether underlying assumptions are reasonable
Obvious problem: people differ in opinion of what is reasonable
E mpirical evidence
Results have problems similar to those foundin opinion polls:interpretation
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
43/45
4 3
Testing P redictions
E conomists such as M ilton Friedmanargue that all theories require unrealisticassumptions.Theory is only useful if it can be used topredict real-world events.
E ven if firms state they dont maximize profits,if their behavior can be predicted by usingtheory, it is useful.
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
44/45
44
M odels of M any M arkets
M arshall's supply and demand model ispartial equilibrium model: E conomic modelof a single marketTo show effects of change in one marketon others requires a general equilibrium
model: An economic model of completesystem of markets
-
8/8/2019 Nicholson Ch01 New
45/45
4 5
P ositive-Normative Distinction
Distinguish between theories that seek toexplain the world as it is and theories that
postulate the way the world should beTo many economists, the correct role for theory is to explain the way the world is(positive ) rather than the way it should be
(normative ).Text takes approach based on positiveeconomics.
top related