october 27, 2016 ctp 2.0 update · transportation 2 purpose of ctp 2.0 effort with the exception of...
Post on 15-Jul-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
October 27, 2016
CTP 2.0 Update
NC RPOs and NCDOT Transportation Planning Branch
Transportation
2
Purpose of CTP 2.0 effort
With the exception of adding a pedestrian element, the format of the CTP maps has
been basically unchanged since 2001.
Things have changed over the last 15 years:
• Complete Streets
• STI / prioritization
• Changes to online mapping applications
• Customer feedback (external/internal)
There is a strong desire to optimize limited resources and improve customer
service.
Transportation
Who Are the CTP Partners/ Customers?
3
• MPOs, RPOs, NCDOT
• Local governments and citizens
• FHWA
• Various NCDOT business units
• Partnering agencies in the planning & project development processes
Transportation
4
Feedback Gathering
Considerable feedback and opinions! (almost 500 responses)
• Survey Monkey (online survey)
• Sticky Note exercises with TPB staff, RPOs, and CTP 2.0 committee
Transportation
5
Customer Feedback Highlights
• Make more user friendly
• Update the maps
• Funding Process
• More Frequent Updates
• Improve public involvement
• Shorten CTP process
Transportation
6
Committee Consensus Highlights
• CTPs should include planning level cost estimates, consistent with SPOT
• Fiscal realism (handled by RPOs)
• Reports should be streamlined
• Align maps with some current classification system
• Consider moving format to a web-based version
• Consider 1 or 2 poster size CTP maps to replace current multiple maps
• Integrate SPOT prioritization mapping with CTP maps
Transportation
7
CTP 2.0 Subcommittees
Mapping
Report
Problem
Statement
Fiscal
Realism-
RPOs
CTP 2.0
Committee
Future Process
Improvements
Transportation
8
CTP Draft Highway Maps
Recommend separating the current
CTP Highway Map in to 2 maps to
reduce visual clutter & enhance its
usefulness
• Highway Recommendations Map
• Highway Systems Map
Transportation
9
Bold header
Map purpose
Gray surrounding counties
with roads
*Only CTP recommendations
(no existing)
*Overall, lack of visual clutter
*Recommendation numbers
ties into report
*Ties in with SPOT
Legal disclaimer
Draft CTP Highway Recommendations Map
Transportation
10
Draft CTP Highway Recommendations Map Proposed Legend
Transportation
11
Draft Recommendations Sheets
Transportation
12
Can accommodate short term and long
term goals for same recommendation
Numbers match color on map
Brief description of recommendation
All recommendations specifies short
or long term
Refers to recommendation sheet
(if available)
Can include map or insets
Includes Operations
Draft Recommendations Descriptions
Transportation
13
Bold header
Map purpose
Gray surrounding counties
with roads
Identifies majors and minors
*Shows changes in categories
Use term Multilane
Divided Highway
Draft CTP Highway Systems Map
Transportation
14
Draft CTP Systems Map- Proposed Facility Types
Transportation
15
• Freight Informational Map
• Will link to Statewide Freight Plan
• Second draft of the Freight Maps
with lots of improvements planned
Draft CTP Freight Map
Transportation
16
Next Steps for CTP 2.0
• Finalize recommendations for Highway Recommendations and Systems Maps, Develop recommendations for multi-modal maps
• Complete Report Template/ Example
• Develop approach for “database” or other tool to generate Recommendations Sheets and other documentation, in order to consolidate various data sources and streamline documentation
Transportation
17
Questions / Comments Suggestions / Feedback
top related