presentazione standard di powerpoint - diapositiva 1 · 2019-10-16 · of the rotating mass 1 2...
Post on 31-Jan-2020
0 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
H2020 OSMOSEOSMOSE WP5: Techno-
economic analysis of DSR and
RES selected services
2019 Sept 19th
EEM19 – 16th Int. Conference on the European Energy Market
Luca Orrù, Marco Pietrucci, Leonardo Zeni - Terna
Dario Siface, Carlo Tornelli, Carlo Sandroni - RSE
2
Agenda
OSMOSE WP5 results
Introduction & context
Highlights & expectations of WP5
Analysis of flexibility services (WP 5.1 – D5.1)
Preliminary results DSR and RES flexibility resources (WP 5.2 –
D5.2)
4
9
6 146
50
4 4
1919
10 1820
515
5117
148
2017 2030 PNIECCarbone Olio combustibile Gas naturalePompaggi puri Idroelettrico EolicoFotovoltaico Altre FER
RES:
~53GW
RES:
~93GW
177123
46
49
17
40
24 756
71916
290310
2017 2030 PNIECTradizionale Idroelettrico Eolico FotovoltaicoGeotermica Bioenergie
RES:
113
TWh
RES:
187
TWh
x3
x2,4
Sc
en
ari
os
at
20
30
18.3%
29.7%34.1%
55.4%
2017 2030 PNIECQuota FER totale Quota FER - elettrico
Coal plant to be
dismissed
➢ RES coverage
Ma
inta
rge
t P
NIE
C
Installed capacity
[GW]
Italian electricity production
[TWh]
➢ Coal phase-out
at 2025
PNIEC (Italian NECP): coal phase-out by 2025 & strong increase of the amount of demand covered by RES
RES - electricityRES - total
PVWindBioenergyGeothermal
Italian energy scenarios at 2030
Coal
PV
GasOil
Other RES
Pumping
Introduction & context
HydroThermal WindHydro
The increasing penetration of renewable energy sources in the generation mix, combined with the simultaneous
decommissioning of conventional carbon-fired power plants, is posing new challenges for the security and
cost-efficiency of grid operation.
-10,000
0,000
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Demand Residual Load Renewables
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
0
-10.000
Demand Residual load Renewables
2030 simulation▪ Significant need of ramping-up thermal generation in the evening hours
to balance the drastic output reduction by solar PV
▪ Poor regulating capacity, following the growing share of RES in the
national generation mix
▪ Limited up-ward reserve margins to cover peak load, following the
decommissioning of significant amount of thermal installed capacity
▪ Grid congestions, due to the non-homogeneous distribution of RES
across the Country (most notably disseminated in the Southern areas)
▪ Increased periods of over-generation from non programmable and non
dispatchable renewables
▪ Limited availability of sources providing voltage regulation (reactive
power) and frequency regulation (rotational inertia against the loss of
system stability)
Consumption and ‘residual load’ curvesMajor operational issues for TSOs
50.000
40.000
30.000
20.000
10.000
0
-10.000
Introduction & contextMain impacts on system operations
Introduction & context
Highlights & expectations of WP5
Analysis of flexibility services (WP 5.1 – D5.1)
Preliminary results DSR and RES flexibility resources (WP 5.2 –
D5.2)
Agenda
OSMOSE WP5 results
7
WP5: Demo WP assessing the provision of Flexibility Services by Demand Response from large industrial loads
and by RES generations; all sources connected to HV level and integrated in a SMS
Project structure and WP5 italian demo
Highlights & expectations
Technology Provider
Flex. Provider
Research centers and Academy
4,6 M€
Divisione Strategie, Sviluppo e Dispacciamento| Strategia di Sistema
WP5 partners, coordinated by Terna, were accurately
defined in order to minimize overlapping:
❑ 2 R&D centers
❑ 3 Industry players
❑ 4 “energy flexibility service” providers
❑ Others “third parties”involved in the execution phase (industrial customers
connected to HV grid)
TASK 5.1 TASK 5.2
TASK 5.3 TASK 5.4
TASK 5.5 TASK 5.6
Planning & Specification
2018-2019
Use Case Implementation
2019
Execution & Reporting
2020-2021
✓ Tasks mainly guided by Terna and RSE in
coordination with all other partners
✓ Massive participation of third parties
(customers connected to HV grid) for the
assessment and specification of DSR services
✓ ABB will manage the implementation of all the
hardware, the local EMSs and the interface
with the central EMS
✓ IBM will focus on developing a software
solution for the central EMS platform
✓ Terna will be responsible for the execution
phase
✓ RSE and Ensiel will cooperate on performing
the ex-post technical and market analysis
✓ Service providers and third parties will
participate to the market analysis proposing
regulatory evolution
on-going
ISC – Uso [INTERNO] 8
Partners and tasks involved in WP5
Highlights & expectations
Terna coordinates a working group of 9 different partners, well distributed on the tasks.
Divisione Strategie, Sviluppo e Dispacciamento| Strategia di SistemaISC – Uso [INTERNO] 9
D5.1Techno-economic
analysis of DSR and RES
D5.4 Implementation of EMS solution
D5.3 Upgrade of industrial load,
aggreg., RES plant and
implementation of grid devices
Final report on the results of the
demonstrations (data analysis)
General technical specification
for EMS and physical demo
implementation
D5.5
D5.6 Final report summarizing
main demo results
Highlights & expectationsTasks & deliverables
D5.2
10
HV connected plant
Aggregator’s NOC
Controller
Inverter
Grid
Other
loads not
involved
• Services pool set points
• Aggregated states and
measures
• Aggregated alarms
• Resources setpoints
• Resources states&measures
• Resources alarms
• Power Set point
• States&measures
• Consumption unit alarms
• Set point
• Machinery states and
measures
•Load alarms
POOL A POOL B POOL C
IEC
104
G G G
•Power modulation
• Resources setpoints
• Resources states&measures
• Resources alarms
• Resources setpoints
• Resources states&measures
• Resources alarms
DSR and RES flexibility resourcesIndustrial loads flexibility analysis
11Divisione Strategie, Sviluppo e Dispacciamento| Strategia di Sistema
Aggregated demand sources RES Plant (also integated with Energy Storage)
Automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve: power
exchange with the grid based on a signal received by
the TSO, with the aim to restore nominal system
frequency
Congestion Management: modify generators/loads
production/consumption according to grid conditions
Automatic Voltage Control: increase or decrease the
reactive power exchange with the grid, helping voltage
regulation
Synthetic Inertia: power delivered as a function of
frequency deviation
Automatic Voltage Control: increase or decrease the
reactive power exchange with the grid, helping voltage
regulation
ISC – Uso [INTERNO]
11
DSR and RES flexibility resourcesGrid services recap
Further flexibility potential from several grid services (RES and DSR side) will be investigated
12
WP5 Demo Area and large consumer involvement
DSR and RES flexibility resources
The demo area of WP5 demonstrator is a part of the 380kV and 150 kV grid between Apulia and Basilicata, grouped in 7 main segments.
The grid portion was chosen because of the high penetration of renewable sources as well as a good number of large industrial consumers connected to HV.
Industrial loads (*)
1. Car manufacturer
2. Water utility
3. Foundry
4. Tires manufacturer
5. Powertrain industry
6. Foundry
7. Water utility
8. Packaging industry
9. Water utility
10.Water utility
11.Tech park
12.Concrete industry
13.Car frame manufacturer
14.Steel mill
15.Oil company
16.Aeronautic company
17.Car manufacturer
18.Aeronautic company
19.Cable manufacturer
20.Military site
After a preliminary scouting of 20 industrial players, 9 agreed to get involved in the demonstrator: an energy audit
was performed to investigate their flexibility potential.
B
Backbone 3
2 Large wind power plants:
A. Pietragalla (Enel) ≈ 18 MW
B. Vaglio (E2I) ≈ 15 MW
A
20 Industrial loads on HV grid
Backbone 2
Backbone 4
Backbone 5
Backbone 6
Backbone 7
Backbone 1
13
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesRES plants involved: Potenza Pietragalla WIND+BESS plant
01❑ 18 MW Wind Power Plant
❑ BESS: 2MW/2MWh, Lithium-ion (NMC)
❑ First BESS power plant in Italy connected to HV
❑ Integrated RES + BESS in operation from Oct 2015
❑ BESS currently active services: Energy Shifting – Unbalancing
Optimization – Dispatch Orders
❑ Services Implemented & tested on BESS, but still not active:
Frequency Regulation – Voltage Regulation
❑ BESS service to be implemented and tested: Synthetic Inertia
Potenza
EGP Potenza Pietragalla WIND+BESS Power Plant
Control System Architecture
14
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesRES plants involved: Potenza Vaglio WIND plant
01
❑ 15 MW Wind Power Plant
❑ Doubly Fed Induction Generator
❑ Active services: Active and Reactive Power Control
❑ Service to be implemented and tested: Synthetic InertiaPotenza
E2I Vaglio WIND Power Plant
Control System Architecture
15
Introduction & context
Highlights & expectations of WP5
Analysis of flexibility services (WP 5.1 – D5.1)
Preliminary results DSR and RES flexibility resources (WP 5.2 –
D5.2)
Agenda
OSMOSE WP5 results
16Divisione Strategie, Sviluppo e Dispacciamento| Strategia di Sistema - IFO
Highlights & expectationsD5.1 Deliverable
17Divisione Strategie, Sviluppo e Dispacciamento| Strategia di Sistema - IFO
Highlights & expectationsD5.1 Deliverable
www.osmose-h2020.eu
→Downloads
→Deliverables
18
• Today there is no market for system inertia
• Existing startup cost of synchronous generators was
used as a proxy for an economical evaluation of SI
provision
• Economic valorization of amount of synthetic inertia
needed to substitute a conventional generator
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesSynthetic inertia
• Variation of active power in response to the Rate
Of Change Of Frequency (ROCOF)
• Demo will test SI service from wind power plants
∆𝑃 = −𝑘𝑆𝐺 ∙ 𝑅𝑂𝐶𝑂𝐹 = −𝑇𝑎𝑃𝑛𝑓𝑛
∙ 𝑅𝑂𝐶𝑂𝐹
Mean Min Max
KSG Price
[€Hz/MWs]572 3 6.332
Price per unit of kSG (Italy - 2017)
19
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesSynthetic Inertia
• Synchronous generators inertial contribution • The inertial response is depending on the kinetic energy
of the rotating mass
𝑑
𝑑𝑡
1
2𝐽𝜔2 = 𝑃𝑚 − 𝑃𝑒
𝐽 is the moment of inertia, 𝜔 the angular rotation speed
𝑃𝑚and 𝑃𝑒 the driving mechanical power and the resistant
electric power applied to the rotor
• The inertial response of a conventional generator to a
certain ROCOF = 𝑑𝑓/𝑑𝑡
𝑃𝑚 − 𝑃𝑒 ≈𝑇𝑎𝑃𝑛𝑓𝑛
∙ ROCOF 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑇𝑎 ≜𝐽𝜔𝑛
2
𝑃𝑛
∆𝑃𝑆𝐺= −𝑇𝑎𝑃𝑛𝑓𝑛
∙ ROCOF = −𝑘𝑆𝐺 ∙ ROCOF
𝑃𝑛 is the generator nominal installed capacity
• Assuming that the driving mechanical 𝑃𝑚 does not
change, the generator injected electric power is
𝒌𝑺𝑮 ≜𝑻𝒂𝑷𝒏
𝒇𝒏
20
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesSynthetic Inertia
• Synchronous generators inertial contribution
• Inertial constant for different generator type
• The inertial response is depending on the kinetic energy
of the rotating mass
𝑑
𝑑𝑡
1
2𝐽𝜔2 = 𝑃𝑚 − 𝑃𝑒
𝐽 is the moment of inertia, 𝜔 the angular rotation speed
𝑃𝑚and 𝑃𝑒 the driving mechanical power and the resistant
electric power applied to the rotor
• The inertial response of a conventional generator to a
certain ROCOF = 𝑑𝑓/𝑑𝑡
𝑃𝑚 − 𝑃𝑒 ≈𝑇𝑎𝑃𝑛𝑓𝑛
∙ ROCOF 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑇𝑎 ≜𝐽𝜔𝑛
2
𝑃𝑛
∆𝑃𝑆𝐺= −𝑇𝑎𝑃𝑛𝑓𝑛
∙ ROCOF = −𝑘𝑆𝐺 ∙ ROCOF
𝑃𝑛 is the generator nominal installed capacity
• Assuming that the driving mechanical 𝑃𝑚 does not
change, the generator injected electric power is
Generator type H [MWs/MVA]
Coal (old) 4
Coal (new) 2
OCGT* 6
CCGT** 9
Cogeneration 2
Biomass 2
Hydro 3
Nuclear 5
CSP*** 2.5
*Open Cycle Gas Turbine
**Combined cycle power plant
***Concentrated solar power
𝒌𝑺𝑮 ≜𝑻𝒂𝑷𝒏
𝒇𝒏=𝟐𝐇𝑨𝒏𝒇𝒏
𝐻 ≜1
2∙𝐽𝜔𝑛
2
𝐴𝑛and 𝑃𝑛 = 𝐴𝑛 ∙ 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜑.
𝐴𝑛 is the nominal apparent power of
the generation unit
𝐻 is the inertia constant, defined
as the ratio between the stored
rotational energy and the plant
nominal power in MVA
21
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesSynthetic Inertia
• Awarded prices for synchronous generators start
up on the Italian balancing market 2017
• Economic valorization of the synthetic inertia
• Analyzing the prices during year 2017, the statistics of
price per unit of 𝑘𝑆𝐺 were obtained
• A SI provider will be computed the amount of synthetic
inertia needed to substitute a conventional generator
∆𝑃𝑒,𝑆𝐼 = −𝑷𝒏 ∙ 𝒌𝑺𝑹𝑰 ∙ ROCOF = −𝒌𝑺𝑰 ∙ ROCOF
∆𝑃𝑒,𝑆𝐺 = −𝒌𝑺𝑮 ∙ ROCOF
22
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesSynthetic Inertia
• Awarded prices for synchronous generators start
up on the Italian balancing market 2017
• Economic valorization of the synthetic inertia
Generator type n. bids
KSG Price
[€Hz/MWs]
Mean
KSG Price
[€Hz/MWs]
Min
KSG Price
[€Hz/MWs]
Max
Fossil Gas 1.216 453 7 2.468
Fossil Oil 74 3.378 671 6.332
Fossil Hard coal 14 1.201 431 3.017
Other 466 416 3 1.887
• Analyzing the prices during year 2017, the statistics of
price per unit of 𝑘𝑆𝐺 were obtained
On a side note, the prices are not uniquely related to the provision of inertia, as the
production units operation, once turned on, might provide simultaneously other benefits to
the power system (e.g. voltage regulations). Therefore, only a portion of those values is
related to the provision of inertia.
• A SI provider will be computed the amount of synthetic
inertia needed to substitute a conventional generator
𝒌𝑺𝑰 ↭ 𝒌𝑺𝑮
∆𝑃𝑒,𝑆𝐼 = −𝑷𝒏 ∙ 𝒌𝑺𝑹𝑰 ∙ ROCOF = −𝒌𝑺𝑰 ∙ ROCOF
∆𝑃𝑒,𝑆𝐺 = −𝒌𝑺𝑮 ∙ ROCOF
⇓
⇓• Economic valorization
𝐒𝐈 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞[€] = 𝐊𝐒𝐆 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐞 ∙ 𝒌𝑺𝑰
23
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesAutomatic Frequency Restoration Reserve
• automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve (aFRR)
used to compensate for the deviations between
demand and production in the Control Area
• Demo will test provision of the aFRR from
aggregated industrial loads in compliance with
grid code*
02
aFRR service provision from industrial loads
(*) the greatest between ± 10 MW and ± 6% of
the maximum power for thermoelectric units.
24
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesAutomatic Frequency Restoration Reserve
• automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve (aFRR)
used to compensate for the deviations between
demand and production in the Control Area
• Demo will test provision of the aFRR from
aggregated industrial loads in compliance with
grid code*
02
aFRR service provision from industrial loads
(*) the greatest between ± 10 MW and ± 6% of
the maximum power for thermoelectric units.
25
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesAutomatic Frequency Restoration Reserve
• automatic Frequency Restoration Reserve (aFRR)
used to compensate for the deviations between
demand and production in the Control Area
• Demo will test provision of the aFRR from
aggregated industrial loads in compliance with
grid code*
02
aFRR service provision from industrial loads
(*) the greatest between ± 10 MW and ± 6% of
the maximum power for thermoelectric units.
• Assumption:o lower costs for reserves provided by new flexible resources
o Pay as Bid market
• Two major evolutionary market scenarios considered
Needed aFRR >
aFRR available from flexible
resources
Needed aFRR <
aFRR available from flexible
resources
Minor impact
• The total cost of the aFRR service
will diminish only for the amount
acquired from flexible resources at
lower prices.
• The benefits will increase with
number and size of new flexible
resources.
Major impact
• Flexible resources cover the total
aFRR needs
• The prices will be determined by
the new market players at lower
cost with an economic benefit (at
least in some hours of the day)
• Expected benefits in total cost reduction for FRR
• Analysis of current prices payed for aFRR service
Italy
July 2017 – June 2018 Upward Downward
aFRR Price (mean) 110 €/MWh 16 €/MWh
26
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesCongestion management
• Demand response P service
• Demo will test provision of congestion
management service from industrial loads in
compliance with UVAM* Italian regulation
(*) Mixed Aggregated Virtual Unit
1 MW
at least
120 minutes max
27
• Expected benefits in total cost reduction for the resolution
of local congestions
• Analysis of current value in the Balancing Market
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesCongestion management
• Demand response P service
• Demo will test provision of congestion
management service from industrial loads in
compliance with UVAM* Italian regulation
• Assumption:o Lower costs for P provided by new flexible resources
o Pay as Bid market
o Intrinsic local constraints in using flexibilities
(*) Mixed Aggregated Virtual Unit
1 MW
at least
120 minutes max
Needed local P > P available from
flexible resources
Needed local P < P available from
flexible resources
Minor impact
• The total cost for local congestion
resolution will diminish only for the
power amount acquired from
flexible resources at lower prices
• The benefits will increase with
number and size of new flexible
resources in congested locations
Major impact
• Flexible resources cover the total
needs for congestion resolution
• The prices will be determined by
the new market players at lower
cost with an economic benefit
Italy
July 2017 – June 2018 Upward Downward
Balancing Market
Price (mean) 125 €/MWh 26 €/MWh
28
• Today in Italy, the AVC is a mandatory service and it is
not remunerated
• Value indirectly evaluated for Italy using other indicators
• An international comparison proposed, using the British
system as a reference case
D5.1 - Analysis of flexibility servicesAutomatic voltage control
• Demand response Q service
• Demo will test provision of AVC service by both
loads and wind power plants, with or without
BESS, either by the WTG itself or by the BESS
ItalyYear 2014
ARERA,
«Documento di
consultazione
420/2016/R/eel,»
Reactive Energy
provided
Dispatching
costs for voltage
regulation
Mean Reactive
Energy price
Total 33.5 TVAr h 150 M€ 4.48 €/MVAr h
GBSep. 2017 –
Aug. 2018
Reactive Energy
provided
Reactive Service
Cost
Mean Reactive
Energy price
Total 25.5 TVAr h 79,3 M£ 3.11 £/MVAr h
Reactive energy quantities and prices for obligatory reactive
power service (ORPS)
29
Introduction & context
Highlights & expectations of WP5
Analysis of flexibility services (WP 5.1 – D5.1)
Preliminary results DSR and RES flexibility resources (WP 5.2 –
D5.2)
Agenda
OSMOSE WP5 results
FOCUS ANALYSIS: IDENTIFIED FLEXIBILITIES
In the 8 industrial plants analyzed the following flexibilities have
been found overall* :
❑ Congestion management
→ Up to 121.3 MW (27.3 loads, 94 generators)
❑ Frequency Restoration Reserve
→ Up to a 94.5 MW (500 kW loads, 94 generators)
❑ Automatic Voltage Control
→ Thousands of MVAr, of which 30 from loads
*Theorethical maximum values resulting from the analysis are shown.
For technical and budget reasons, only some of the flexibilities found will be tested
Load flexibilities for congestion management and aFRR to be investigated in
the WP5 demonstrator: illustrative aggregation sketch
Flexibility analysis found out some interesting resources to be tested for electrical flexibility. These resource
will be properly aggregated in order to provide a significant result for the Grid
FOCUS ANALYSIS: MAIN TAKEAWAYS
Industrial processes
highly optimizedFew buffers between
process phases
Most of the availability
is for auxiliary services
DSR and RES flexibility resourcesIndustrial loads flexibility analysis
H2020 OSMOSE
OSMOSE WP5: Techno-economic
analysis of DSR and RES selected
services
Thank you
Luca Orrù – luca.orru@terna.itTERNA Strategy, Development & Dispatching - System
Strategy – Innovation Factory
Carlo Tornelli – carlo.tornelli@rse-web.itRSE – Transmission and Distribtion Technologies dept.
top related