quantum storytelling abstract water argumentation for ... quantum... · storytelling science in...

1

WaterArgumentationforMultispeciesEthicsinQuantumStorytelling

Abstractfor9thAnnualQuantumStorytellingConferenceDec15-172019inLasCrucesNewMexicohttps://davidboje.com/quantum

DavidM.Boje

AbstractWearewaterybeingsonawateryplanetwhosefreshwaterisrunninglowbecauseofglobalheatingchangestothewatercyclebecauseofhumanactivities.Freshwatersupplyisgoingtoinfluencefoodandwatersecurityaroundtheworld.Howcanquantumstorytellingcontributetomitigatingthisglobalproblem?IproposethatweneedtodevelopawayofdoingargumentationthatbringsTamara-Land(Boje,1995)fromstorytellingorganizations(Boje,2008)toplanetarystorytellinglevelofanalysis.StephenToulmin’s‘argumentationisexploredwasawayforgroundingclaimsinthequantumrealmofspacetimematteringoftheglobalwatercrises.FollowingDonnaHaraway(2016)‘multispeciesstorytelling’changesourethicfromhumancentricwaterstorytellingtomultispecieswaterstorytelling.IcontributeaToulmin’sapproachto‘TrueStorytelling’withgrounds,initialclaim,warrant,rebuttal,verifier,andqualifierstoarriveatfinalconclusion:anewwaterethicisneededforGaia.Weneedtoreturnwatertothepublicgood,forallspeciestohavelife.KeyWords:Tamara-Land,QuantumStorytelling,MultispeciesStorytelling,&WaterEthic

Wearewaterybeings.Wearenotabody,butrather37.2trillionlivingcells,allcravingwaterforlife,andwearewalkingclimatecolonyofcells,exchangingwiththecoloniesoflivingcellsinourenvironsataquantumlevel.Wearewaterybeingsonawateryplanet.Ourwateryplanethasverylittlefreshwaterandanabundanceofsaltwater,andallthiswaterisgettingpolluted.Thewholewatercycleisbeingtransformedbyclimatechangethatisbeginningtoberelanguagedandrestoriedasglobalheating.

Mypurposeistosketchthe‘self-correcting’approachto‘storytellingscience’anddevelopseveralargumentationaspectsforquantumstorytelling(Boje,2012;Boje,2014).IdrawuponBojeandRosile’s(inreview)newbookthatdevelops‘self-correctingstorytellingscience’thathasalreadybeenthemethodbasisforsixdissertationsdoneorwillbecompletedsoon(MarkvanderKlei,SabrinaDadder,MabelSanchez,TKThomasKleiner,JimSibel,andRussBarnes).Self-correctinginductionmethodologycanbeusedinstorytellingconversations,fieldworkstudies,orinconductingexperimentsintopraxis,anditcanbeusedinconductingpracticechangesthatcreatenewbetsonthefuture.Indoing‘littles’‘storytellingscience’itisnotatallaboutasingleormultiplecases,butratherdoing‘self-correctingstorytellingscience,’inaseriesof‘abduction-induction-deduction’(A-I-D)cyclesofself-correctioninspiredintheworkofCharlesSandersPeirce,HannahArendt,KarlPopper,HenriSavall,andJean-PaulSartre.Thepointwearemakinginself-

2

correctingstorytellingconversationmethodistowriteitdown,writeouttheabductions-inductions-deductionsasyougo,doitBefore,notposthoc,after-the-fact(Boje&Rosileinreview,boldness,ours).Themethodiscompletelydifferentformtheusualsemi-structuredinterviews,followedbya‘stack-and-bake’themeanalysisofallthetranscriptsinordertotakeawayatypology.Semi-structuredinterviewsareformsofinterrogationwheretheinterviewerattemptsaridiculousnon-bias,bykeepingtheirownstorytellingsilentandsecret.Itisnotreallyco-inquiry,notreallyaconversationthatexplores.

Thispresentationisinthreeparts,(I)whatisself-correctingstorytellingscience,(II)howitappliestoanalyzingandinterveninginglobalwatercrises,and(III)discussionofhowself-correctingcomparestoothertheoriessuchasFisher’s‘NarrativeParadigmTheory’(NPT),andendingwithroleofself-corrrectingstorytellingscienceinTrueStorytelling.

PARTI:Towardsa‘self-correctingstorytellingscience’

We(Boje&Rosile,inreview)proposeawayofdoingastorytellingmethodologycalled,“self-correctinginduction”fromtheworkofCharlesSandersPeirce(1933-1937,5.58),whichhereaftermeansVolume5,section#580):“Inaninductionweenlargeoursampleforthesakeoftheself-correctingeffectoftheinduction.”Justbefore(5.579)Peirceexampleshisenthusiasm,“Soitappearsthatthismarvelousself-correctingpropertyofReason,whichHegelmadesomuchof,belongstoeverysortofscience,althoughitappearsasessentialintrinsic,andinevitableonlythehighesttypeofreasoning,whichisinduction.”

Thisisaslidefromapresentationin2018inNewZealandbyMarkvanderKlei.

3

Figure1:SlidebyMarkvanderKlei(usedbypermission)

TheMāoriword‘ahau’hasnodirectEnglishtranslation.CloseasIcancometoit,itis“Me”or“I”,doingsoul-searching,andself-reflectionbeforeenteringastorytellingconversation.Thisbeginsthefirstphaseofstorytellingconversationmethodofself-correctingsequenceofencounters.Insecondphase,asdepictedinvanderKlei’sresearchhehadaconversationalinterviewwithtwopeopleondifferentoccasionsandsoughtoutarefutingstorytellingconversationonemoreperson.Inthirdphase,therewerethreepersonshehadstorytellingconversationswith,andbeganarefutingconversationwithanotherperson,whowasjoinedbyacolleague(1+1).Inthefourthphase,fourseparatestorytellingconversationswithexperts,andarefutingconversationwithanotherperson.Inthefifthphase,threeseparatestorytellingconversationswithexperts,andapersonjoinedbyanotherperson(1+1)inarefutingconversation.Notshownisafinalphase,inwhichMarkgetsasmanypersonswhocaretocome,togetherforafocusgroupconversationinwhichMarksharestheclaimsandconclusions,theverificationsandrefutationsofthetheoryhedevelopedinhisstudy.InMaoriculture,youdon’tdosemi-structuredinterviews,ratheryouputyour‘skininthegame’anddoabackandforthstorytelling.

CriticsofthesolutionsproposedbytheUnitedNations‘IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange’(IPCC)andvariantsofGreenNewDeals(GNDs)areaskingthatweturntoKarlPopper.

4

“Serious’proposalsforresolvingenvironmentalissuesleapoverthe(Karl)Popperianobservationthatanystatisticaloutcomecanbeundonebyredefiningthevariables,toavailthemselvesofthescientificstatureoftechnologicalreasoning.Thisistomakethepointthatwhatisrigorousargumentationinonedimensionisignorantdelusioninanother.Lestthisreadas‘anti-science,’Popperwastryingtosavesciencewiththeobservation.Threeofthefourscenariostokeeptheriseinglobaltemperaturesatorbelow1.5degreesCelsiuspresentedbytheIPCCintheir2018paperrequire‘negativeemissions’technologies—methodsofactivelyremovingcarbonfromtheatmosphere.Someofthese,likereforestation,aresuperficiallyattractivetotheenvironmentallyinclined.Theproblemscomeboththroughthefineprintandthefocusonclimateratherthantheenvironment”(CounterPunch.com).1

The‘negativeemissions’technologies’(NET’s)havemostlynotbeen

inventedyet,andthefewthatareavailable,suchastreeplantations,have(hiddencost)environmentalimpacts.Popper(1963)advocatedacombinationofconjectures(verifications)andrefutations(attemptstofalsifytheories&propositions).

OneofourQuantumStorytellingConferencefrequentpresentersiscriticalofKarlPopper(1935/1959/1992/2000’Popper,1963;Popper,1972)fornotdealingwithauxiliaryassumptions:Popperdoesfalsification(refutation)toproveatheory(deduction)inreactiontoitsobservations(inductive),butismissingtheAuxiliaryAssumptions(onlytestingsomeassumptions,whileotherassumptionsgountested).

ThegoodnewsforthisconferenceisPopper(1956/1982)wasworkingoutthequantumtheoryimplicationsforhisworkonlogicofscientificdiscovery.AfullreviewofPopper’sworkisbeyondthescopeofthispresentation.Somehighlightswillhelp.Popper(1956/1983:20)hadahumilityforfallibilismofscience,theroadofdiscoverydoesnotend.Popperbelieved,sciencecantestoutideasfrommetaphysics.Peirce(1931/1960:vol.6)isalsofocusedon‘scientificmetaphysics’,andinvol.5(section#587)includesquantumtheory,“sothatasfaraspurelyinductiveevidenceisconcernedweareveryveryfarfrombeingentitledtothinkthatmatterisabsolutelypermanent.”Popper(1956/1983)alsoquestionedarealismapproachtoscience.Peirce(1931/1960:8.110)concerningtherelationofscience,mathematics,andmetaphysics,saystheysharethisreasoningbypre-conceivedidea,that“neverreachesanyconclusionatallastowhatisorisnottrueoftheworldofexistencesThemetaphysician,ontheotherhand,isengagedintheinvestigationofmattersoffact,andtheonlywaytomattersoffactisthewayof1CounterPunch.com“Sept27,2019ClimateChangeandTechnology”byRobUrie,accessedSep292019athttps://www.counterpunch.org/2019/09/27/climate-change-and-technology/

5

experience”,andsuchistheontologicalmetaphysicsofthisAmericanPragmatist.Popper(1978)focusedondifferentvaluesofdifferentworld(communities).Inhis(1945/2008’1945/2012;2008)workPoppersoughtanOpenSocietythatwouldnotrepeattheerrorsoffascisminWWII.

TestsproposedbyC.S.PeirceandPeirceare(1)criticalreflectionsontheory(2)[conversational]interviewswithothers,(3)studyingscienceaboutit,&(4)doingexperiments,andusingthesetocorrectabductions,deductions,andwhatyoudoininduction.However,bothdonotadequatelydealwithTrafimow’s(2012)‘auxiliaryassumptions’inwhatPeircecallstheabduction-induction-deduction(A-I-D)triadic,whichisalsoadvocatedbyHenriSavallandcolleagues,inSocio-EconomicApproachtoManagement(SEAM)(Boje,2017b,2018a,2019b).

Figure2:Abduction-Induction-DeductionTriadicofC.S.Peircewithannotated

quotesforhiswriting(Key:2isvolumenumberof1931/1960collectionofPeirce’swritings,andthesecondnumberissectionnumber)

Elsewhere,Peirce(1931/19602.729pp.455-456,boldnessours)adds,“Nor

mustwelosesightoftheconstanttendencyoftheinductiveprocesstocorrectitself.

WecanapplyDavidTrafimow’s(2012;Trafimow&Uhalt,inpress)‘AuxiliaryAssumptionsto’GlobalWarmingandWaterStorytelling:

Theory(T)Humanactivities(p)causeGlobalWarming(q)Observation(O)–planetwarmingupAuxiliaryAssumptions(As)FALLACYOFAFFIRMINGCONSEQUENTMajorPremise:TàOifcapitalism,thenglobalwarmingresults

6

MinorPremise:OitiswarmingtemperatureConclusion:TisTrue:Itscapitalism,ofcourse

Figure3:RenditionofTrafimow’sAuxiliaryAssumptionsinrelationtoTheory

Development(Boje,2019)Auxiliaryassumptions,accordingtoTrafimow(2012),areselectively

includedinparticulartheories,andinthemethodstotest.Imakethepointthatintheuniverseofboth/and(bothqualitativeandnumeric/quantitative)multiplicities,therearevarioustheories(&predictions)eachwiththeirownassumptions,butdonottapallthepossibleassumptions.Therefore,self-correcting,phasebyphase,canbedone,tocheckthemout,oneorafewatatime.

Popper’s(1963:318trial-and-errormethodofsciencezigzagcanbecombinedwithPeirce’sself-correctingmethod,andSavall(&colleague’s)workonA-I-Dtriadicinterventionsthatcanbehelpfulindoingstorytellinganalysisandrestoryingtransformationwork.Popper(1972:243)providesthistheory:

PS1èTT1èEE1èPS2• PS1=Problemsituation,initialresponse• TT1=Tentativetheories(conjectures)• EE1=Erroreliminationbytesting• PS2=Problemsituation,theoriessurvivingrefutationprocess

Popper(1994)recommendswenottreattheoriesby‘TheMythofthe

Framework’.Popper

7

Figure3:SirEcclesnotesonKarlPopperLecture,

NewZealand1940

AbovedrawingsarebySirJohnCarewEccles(1945)fromnoteshetookononPopper’s1940LecturesonPrinciplesofScientificMethod.PopperarguesinalectureinNewZealandgiven1940,thatzigzagpiecemealsocialexperimentsrelyingonthescientificmethodbyanattitudeofhumility,fallibility,anda“readinesstolearnformmistakes”andmake“smallexperiments”by“agreatnumberofpiecemealadjustmentstothevariousparts”of“agreatnumberofexperiencesispreferabletotheleadershipofthe“megalomaniatyrant”(Popper,2008:p.61).WefindthatPopperwouldagreewithPeirce(1931/1960:7.114)writingon‘scientificmethod’“Itistheposthocergopropterhocfallacy’by‘posthoc’reducingAbduction(metaphysicalguesses&hypotheses)totheInductive(experiences&observedfact)andclaimingDeductivetobeuniversalthatisthefallacyofinquiry.

8

PARTII:HowthisappliestoWaterStorytelling(Boje,2018b)

Figure5:PeakWaterCrisesbeforeWaterApocalypse

KennethandI(Boje&Mølbjerg-Jørgensen,2018)havewrittenaboutthepeakwaterovershoot,howthreepeakwatercrisesareunfolding,andwithoutchangestoenvironmentallyresponsiblebehaviorwillresultinwaterapocalypse.

Climatescientistssignedoffona‘secondnotice’warninghumanitythatthe

gameishighrisk(Rippleetal.,2017;Boje,2019a,2019c).PresidentTrumpiswhatPopper(1956/1983:304)wouldcallan“inductivegambler”cuttingoutwater,air,andforestprotectionsthatarehighrisk[antenarrative]‘betsonthefuture.’

9

Figure4:ArgumentationinaGlobalTamara-Land

TheabovefigureisawaytointegrategraphicallyaTamara-Land(Boje,

1995)scaledtothelevelofglobalwatercapitalism(Boje,2017a)thatweareallwithin,andwaysofdoingargumentationbasedonStevenToulmin’s(1972)andcolleagueswork(Toulmin,Rieke,&Janik,1980).Wecannotescapecapitalismapproachestotheprivatizationandcommodificationofwater,evenifwehaveourownrainwatercollectionsystem,reuseit,usegreywater,andsoon.Everyproductandserviceofcapitalismusesnotjustdirectwater,butthevirtualwaterofenergy,machines,supplychains,transport,etc.Wehavegonepastpeakoil,peakcarbon,andnowarepastpeakwater,asittobecomesscarceandscarcerwithglobalheating.Mygrounds:watercapitalismisgrowingdespiteeffortsbytheUnitedNationssustainabledevelopmentgoals(SDGs)andtheEuropeanUnion’sAgenda2030tokeepaverageglobaltemperaturefromeclipsing1.5degreesCelsiussincetheindustrialrevolution.TheUNandEUinitiativesaroundwater,carbon,andtemperature,tocontroldesertification,deforestation,andsoon,hasbeencolonizedbytwocorporatenarrativesofdenialanddelay:triplebottomline(3BL)andcirculareconomy(CE)(Boje,2016).Thetwoarenotindependentormutuallyexclusive.CEisakindof3BLlogic,wherecontinuedcapitalismgrowthisstoriedaspossiblebyturningtotechnologiessuchasrenewableenergyforelectricity,electrictransport,carboncapture,andattemptsto‘ReduceEmissionsfromDeforestationandDegradation’(REDD)havefailed. DiscussionandConclusions

10

Howdoes‘self-correctingstorytelling’methodandtheorycomparetoWalterFisher’s‘narrativeparadigmtheory’(NPT).Ifitsnodifferent,thenwehavesomerealproblems.WalterFisher’s(NPT)hastwotestsof‘narrativerationality’:2

1. Probabilitydefinedaspeople’sinherentstorylisteningskills(orcompetenceinevaluatingstories&storytellers).IsthisTruestorytellingorsomekindofmake-believefantasy?

2. Fidelitydefinedasstorylistenercomparingandevaluatingwhattheyhearinsomeoneelse’storytellingagainsttheirownsimilarexperiencesandbeliefsystems.

Ihaveofferedthiscritiqueinpriorwork(Boje,2012b,2015)whichIwillsummarize:1. ‘homonarrens’isahumancentricdeclarationthatonlyhumansarecapableof

storytelling.DonnaHaraway(2016),bycontrast,imagines‘multispeciesstorytelling’andWilliamJames(1907)how‘thingstellstories.

2. Notallhuman-discoursefollowsNPTargumentativeform.Fisher’sreferencetosubtextofstoryteller’sandstorylistener’swaysofdecidingtrueandfake.

3. Ignoresstoryableandunstoryableeventsinstorytelling(e.g.trauma).4. Therearedifferentcompetenciesofstorytellersanddifferentcompetencies

ofstorylisteners.WalterBenjaminsaysstorytellingcompetencesarecomingtoanendinmoderncapitalism

5. Fisherprovidednospecificsonhowtomakechoicesbetweentrueandfakestorytellingprobabilityorfidelity.

6. Finally,thestorytellinglogicofgoodreasonsisinadequatelydevelopedbecauseitfailstoconsiderhowvaluescanbepresentedinstorytellingargumentsandoncepresented,the‘relativeworth’ofone(oftenunstated)valueagainstanother

Totheextentthatself-correctingstorytellingscienceanditsargumentation

applyingToulmin’swork,solvesthesesixproblems,itisastepforward.TotheextentitincorporatesTrafimowconcernforauxiliaryassumptions,itisastepbeyondNPT.

But,doesself-correctinggetusto‘TrueStorytelling’(Boje,Larsen,&Bruun,2017;Boje,Laren,&Bruun,inpress,Boje,2019b)?

2Fisher’s(1984,1985a&b,1989).SlideissummaryofBoje(2012,2015)

11

Figure6:TrueStorytelling

SevenTrueStorytellingPrinciples

1. Truth:Youyourselfmustbetrueandpreparetheenergyandeffortforasustainablefuture

2. Makeroom:Truestorytellingmakesspacesrespectingthestoriesalreadythere

3. Plot:Youmustcreatestorieswithaclearplotcreatingdirectionandhelppeopleprioritize

4. Timing:Youmusthavetiming

5. Helpstoriesalong:Youmustbeabletohelpstoriesontheirwayandbeopentoexperiment

6. Staging:Youmustconsiderstagingincludingscenographyandartifacts

7. Reflection:Youmustreflectonthestoriesandhowtheycreatevalue

We(Boje,Larsen,&Brunn,2017)developedtheprinciplesasawaytogetcommunitiesofpractitioners,closertotruestorytelling,byrefutinganddeconstructionthefakestorytellingofgreenwashing,especiallyprevalentinthesustainabilitymovement.Truestorytellingisanethicalposition,awayofdoing

12

dialoguesamongactors,includingGaialogues,3togettowaysofmakingthesituationbetter.Whilethereisnoabsolutetruth,thereisanontologicalreal,inwhichwaterandcarbonbudgetsarebeingnotonlyoverdrawnbutcontinuedratesofcapitalismgrowthwillleadtowaterandcarbonbankruptcy.Unlesswecanturntoanecologicallyandsociallyresponsiblecapitalism(Boje,2018a)orsomethingbeyondcapitalismthatactuallylowerstheoutputofcarbonandconservesavailablefreshwaterforallspecies,notjusttherichesthumans,ourgrandchildrenwillexperiencenotonlyglobalheating,butanexistentialevent,thewaterapocalypse(Boje,2019c,inreview).ReferencesBoje,D.M.(1995).Storiesofthestorytellingorganization:Apostmodernanalysisof

Disneyas“Tamara-Land”.AcademyofManagementJournal,38(4),997-1035.

Boje,D.M.(2008).StorytellingOrganizations.ThousandOaks,CA:Sage.Boje,D.M.(2012a).Reflections:WhatdoesQuantumPhysicsofStorytellingMean

forChangeManagement?JournalofChangeManagement,accepted7/22/2011,Vol.12(3):253-271.OnlineaccessedMar112019athttps://davidboje.com/vita/paper_pdfs/JCM_BojeReflections_July212011.pdf

Boje,D.M.(2012b).QuantumSpiralsforBusinessConsulting.Unpublishedms.

Accessedathttps://business.nmsu.edu/~dboje/448/QUANTUM%20SPIRALS%20for%20Business%20Consulting%20a%20book%20by%20David%20M%20Boje%20July%209%202012.pdf

Boje,D.M.(2014).StorytellingOrganizationalPractices:Managinginthequantum

age.London:Routledge.Boje,D.M.(2015)QuantumPhysicsofStorytelling.Unpublisedms.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233292397_The_Quantum_Physics_of_Storytellingand

3Seeforexample,workbyBoje,Larsen,andMolbergatWiemar,EuropeanSchoolofGoverningEUSGGaiaStorytellingseminar2020Aprilhttps://davidboje.com/Gaia/GAIASTORYTELLINGFORGAIALEADERSHIPWEIMARVILLAI.html

13

Boje,D.M.(2016).CritiqueoftheTripleBottomLine.Pp.181-198inGraceAnnRosile(ed.)TribalWisdomforBusinessEthics.Bingley,UK:EmeraldGroupPublishingLimited.

Boje,D.M.(2017a).TheatersofCapitalism:CreatingConsciousCapitalism.Las

Cruces,NM:TamaraLandpublishing.Boje,D.M.(2017b).HowdoesQuantumStorytellingRelatestoSavall's

SocioeconomicDoubleSpiral?ProceedingsPaper,writtenNovember17,2017forthe7thannualQuantumStorytellingConference,December14-16,2017.Availableonlineathttp://davidboje.com/quantum/pdfs_quantum_2017/Boje_SEAM_DOUBLE_SPIRALS_and_STORYTELLING.htm

Boje,D.M.(2018a).Preface:“GlobalCapitalismisUnsustainable"forSavall,H.,&

Peron,Michel,Zardet,Veronique,&Bonnet,Marc.SociallyResponsibleCapitalism.London:Routledge.Citingfromhttp://davidboje.com/vita/paper_pdfs/PrefaceBoje-AfterTLHeditingApr142017.docx

Boje,D.M.(2018b).SevenTrueStorytellingSolutionstotheGlobalWaterCrisis.

Proceedingpaperfor8thAnnualQuantumStorytellingConference,December13.AccessedFeb92019athttp://davidboje.com/388/2018%20storytelling%20conference%20BOJE%20__%20True%20Storytelling%20of%20New%20Mexico%20Water.docx

Boje,D.M.(2019a).GlobalStorytelling:ThereisNoPlanetB.

Singapore/London/NY:WorldScientific.Boje,D.M.(2019b).OrganizationalResearch:StorytellingInAction.London/NY:

Routledge.Boje,D.M.(2019c,inreview).StorytellingInterventionsinGlobalWaterCrisis.

Singapore/London/NY:WorldScientific.

Boje,D.M.;Larsen,Jens;Brunn,Lena.(2017).‘TrueStorytelling:Howtosucceedwithyourimplementation’,workingpaper.http://oldfriendsindustries.com/?page_id=1048seealsowww.truestorytelling.org

Boje,D.M.;Larsen,Jens;Brunn,Lena.(inpress).London/NY:Routledge.Boje,D.M.;MølbjergJørgensen,Kenneth.(2018).Makingthefuture:the

antenarrativechallengeofsustainabilityforproblem-basedlearning.ChapterforLearningOrganizationHandbook.

14

Eccles,JohnCarew.(1945).Principlesofscientificmethod:notesonfivelecturesby

Dr.K.R.Popper,givenattheUniversityofOtagofrom22ndto26thMay,1945,22typespages.AccessedMar82019athttp://popper-prior.nz/items/show/208

Peirce,CharlesSanders.(1931/1960).CollectedPapersofCharlesSandersPeirce.

VolIPrinciplesofPhilosophy&VolIIElementsofLogic.EditedbyCharlesHartshorne&PaulWeiss.Cambridge,MA:TheBelknapPressofHarvardUniversityPress.

Popper,KarlR.(1935/1959/1992/2000).TheLogicofScientificDiscovery.LogikderForschungfirstpublished1935byVerlagvonJuliusSpringer,Vienna,Austria.FirstEnglishtranslationbyHutchinson&Co.then1992byLondon:Routledge,andagainbyRoutledgeClassics2000,accessedonlineMar62019athttp://strangebeautiful.com/other-texts/popper-logic-scientific-discovery.pdfandfromhttp://www.math.chalmers.se/~ulfp/Review/logicscdis.pdf

Popper,KarlR.(1956/1982).QuantumTheoryandtheSchisminPhysics.Form

thePostscripttotheLogicofScientificDiscovery,editedbyW.W.Bartley,III.Author’snoteandprefaceare1982,restis1956.London/Sydney/Auckland,NZ:Hutchinson&Co.(Publishers)Ltd.

Popper,KarlR.(1956/1983).RealismandtheAimofScience.FromthePostscript

totheLogicofScientificDiscoveryeditedbyW.W.Bartley,III.Includesa1956Preface,andintroduction,1982,andpublishedtogether1983.London,UK:Hutchinso&Co.(Publishers)Ltd.

Popper,KarlR.(1963).ConjecturesandRefutations:TheGrowthofScientific

Knowledge.London:RoutledgeandKeganPaul.Popper,KarlR.(1972).Objectiveknowledge(Vol.360).Oxford:OxfordUniversity

Press.AccessedonlineMar72019athttps://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/845d/20c52e47cfb379ba1e384de92ed78eaac3ad.pdf

Popper,KarlR.(1978).TheThreeWorlds.TheTannerLectureonHumanValues.

Pp.141-167.DeliveredatTheUniversityofMichigan,April7.AccessedonlineMar102019athttps://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf

Popper,KarlR.(1945/2008).AftertheOpenSociety:SelectedSocialandPolitical

Writings.Firstpublished1945,thenin2008editedbyJeremyShearmurandPiersNorrisTurner.London/NY:Routledge(Taylor&FrancisGroup).

15

Popper,KarlR.(1994).TheMythoftheFramework:Indefenseofscienceandrationality.EditedbyM.S.Notturno.London/NY:Routledge.

Popper,K.(1945/2012).TheOpenSocietyanditsEnemies.Firstpublished1945

byRoutlege&KeganPaul.2012editionbyLondon/NY:Routledge.Popper,KarlR.(2008).AfterTheOpenSociety:SelectedSocialandPolitical

WritingsKarlPopper.EditedbyJeremyShearmurandPiersNorrisTurner.Abingdon(Oxfordshire),UK/NY,NY:Routledge(Taylor&FrancisGroup).

Toulmin,S.(1972).Rationalityandscientificdiscovery.InPSA:Proceedingsofthe

Biennialmeetingofthephilosophyofscienceassociation(Vol.1972,pp.387-406).D.ReidelPublishing.

Toulmin,S.,Rieke,R.,&Janik,A.(1980).ToulminsBoldExperiment.InformalLogic,

3(2).

Trafimow,David.(2012).Theroleofauxiliaryassumptionsforthevalidityofmanipulationsandmeasures.Theory&Psychology,22,486–498.

Trafimow,David;Uhalt,J.(inpress).Thequalityofauxiliaryassumptionsdependsuponconnectionstononobservationaltermsintheoriesandobservationaltermsinempiricalhypotheses.Theory&Psychology