questionnaire on well-being at work – hanken 2010 and 2011 compared to other universities 2011
Post on 25-Dec-2015
219 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Questionnaire on well-being at work – Hanken 2010 and 2011 compared to other
universities 2011
Background information
• The questionnaire has been developed by the universities and Varma together (under the supervision of PhD Heidi Keso)
• The questionnaire was carried out for the first time in 2010, when it was answered by a total of ca 4 700 persons (127 of these at Hanken)
• In year 2011 the total number of responses amounted to ca 12 800 (133 of these at Hanken)
• In addition to Hanken, the following universities took part in the survey during 2011:
Aalto University University of Jyväskylä
University of Oulu University of Turku
University of Helsinki Finnish Academy of Fine Arts
Sibelius Academy University of Vaasa
University of Eastern Finland Lappeenranta University of Technology
University of Tampere Åbo Akademi University
• The response rate at Hanken: 59,1 % (compared to 57,2 % in year 2010)
Unit/department Response rate 2011 Response rate 2010
Department of Finance and Statistics / CREF / CEFIR 58% 58%
Department of Management and Organisation 60% 65%
Department of Marketing/ CERS / HUMLOG 61% 38%
Department of Accounting and Commercial Law 29%
29 % (Accounting and Commercial Law)
43 % (Economics)Department of Economics 43%
Centre of Languages and Business Communication 59% 68%Library / Computer Centre 76% 65%
Administration, the Centre for Research and International Affairs, and all other units 60% 60%
Teaching or research personnel 55% 50%Other 65% 66%
Helsinki Campus 61% 58%Vaasa Campus 50% 51%
Rate of Respons - Hanken
Average per sub-category
Your jo
b
Manag in
g
Super vis
o r y w
o r k
Wor k
com
mun it y
and c
o - oper a
t ion
Com
pe tenc e
Mo t iv
a t ion
Hea lth
and l i
f e s
i t ua t io
n
T he un iv
e r sit y
' s im
age
Equa l i ty
MEAN
1
1 .5
2
2 .5
3
3 .5
4
4 .5
5
3 .5
3 .2
3 .83 .6
3 .4 3 .43 .5
3 .7
4 .2
3 .63 .5
3 .3
3 .9
3 .6 3 .63 .4
3 .5
3 .8
4 .3
3 .73.8
3
3.7 3.6 3.5 3.43.6
3.9
3.5
H ank en 2010 ( A l l) H ank en 2011 ( A l l) O the r U n iv e r s it ies 2011
Total average per department or unit - Hanken
Unit/department Average 2011
Average 2010
Department of Finance and Statistics / CREF / CEFIR 3,7 3,3
Department of Management and Organisation 3,8 3,7
Department of Marketing/ CERS / HUMLOG 3,5 3,4
Department of Accounting and Commercial Law + Department of Economics 3,5 3,4
Centre of Languages and Business Communication 3,6 3,4
Library / Computer Centre 3,6 3,5
Administration, the Centre for Research and International Affairs, and all other units 3,7 3,6
Teaching or research personnel 3,7 3,5
Other 3,7 3,7
Helsinki Campus 3,7 3,6
Vaasa Campus 3,7 3,6
Your job1. My job description is clear and I understand my goals (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1%
5%
9%
39%
46%
1%
0%
2%
10%
36%
49%
3%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.352, Standard dev iation: 0.759)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.246, Standard dev iation: 0.873)
Your job2. My job is suitably challenging (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
6%
9%
46%
37%
1%
2%
5%
14%
40%
38%
1%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.061, Standard dev iation: 0.971)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.119, Standard dev iation: 0.909)
Your job3. I have enough time to carry out my duties during working hours (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
14%
24%
19%
24%
19%
0%
13%
23%
18%
29%
17%
0%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.158, Standard dev iation: 1.308)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.087, Standard dev iation: 1.345)
Your job4. I am able to concentrate on my job without undue disturbances (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
7%
31%
23%
24%
16%
0%
10%
26%
24%
29%
11%
0%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.046, Standard dev iation: 1.176)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.102, Standard dev iation: 1.207)
Your job5. I have enough influence over my own job and duties (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
12%
24%
33%
27%
1%
2%
14%
26%
32%
26%
1%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.667, Standard dev iation: 1.061)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.675, Standard dev iation: 1.116)
Your job6. Changes at work do not lessen my ability to cope at work (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
7%
17%
22%
31%
21%
2%
7%
12%
26%
36%
14%
5%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.413, Standard dev iation: 1.112)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.411, Standard dev iation: 1.21)
Your job7. I have the appropriate tools (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1%
14%
15%
39%
32%
0%
4%
12%
15%
40%
28%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.771, Standard dev iation: 1.106)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.873, Standard dev iation: 1.035)
Your job8. The dining and other social areas are adequate (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
22%
25%
34%
12%
2%
8%
26%
26%
23%
15%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.099, Standard dev iation: 1.202)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.236, Standard dev iation: 1.124)
Your job9. The ratio between teaching and research work is satisfactory (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 129
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
28%
15%
25%
13%
10%
7%
17%
25%
16%
17%
17%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.228, Standard dev iation: 1.254)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.074, Standard dev iation: 1.257)
Managing10. The university's strategy is clear and comprehensible (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
11%
35%
37%
11%
3%
3%
10%
28%
35%
13%
11%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.508, Standard dev iation: 0.985)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.447, Standard dev iation: 0.925)
Managing11. The university acts openly when making and preparing decisions (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
9%
28%
36%
17%
4%
6%
8%
25%
28%
27%
3%
10%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.925, Standard dev iation: 1.022)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.765, Standard dev iation: 0.998)
Managing12. Employees are able to influence the university's decisions (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
31%
34%
17%
4%
7%
5%
36%
29%
17%
3%
11%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.737, Standard dev iation: 0.947)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.763, Standard dev iation: 0.984)
Managing13. The strategy steers the activities and primary tasks of our unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
21%
35%
27%
9%
6%
4%
13%
38%
23%
7%
16%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.196, Standard dev iation: 0.948)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.167, Standard dev iation: 1.007)
Managing14. Men and women have equal opportunities for advancement in our unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
7%
13%
20%
50%
9%
2%
5%
12%
22%
47%
12%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.216, Standard dev iation: 1.037)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.19, Standard dev iation: 1.063)
Managing15. Our meeting practices are well suited for achieving the unit's goals (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
17%
26%
24%
7%
18%
5%
14%
25%
26%
11%
19%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.271, Standard dev iation: 1.104)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.077, Standard dev iation: 1.112)
Supervisory work16. My supervisor makes sure that our goals and tasks are clear (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
14%
22%
26%
21%
9%
4%
10%
20%
42%
21%
4%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.693, Standard dev iation: 1.05)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.409, Standard dev iation: 1.242)
Supervisory work17. My supervisor regularly carries out performance evaluations with me (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
7%
14%
19%
44%
10%
2%
3%
13%
34%
45%
3%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.195, Standard dev iation: 0.948)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.974, Standard dev iation: 1.265)
Supervisory work18. I get enough constructive feedback from my supervisor (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
9%
13%
24%
25%
24%
4%
5%
14%
25%
34%
20%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.523, Standard dev iation: 1.108)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.418, Standard dev iation: 1.272)
Supervisory work19. My supervisor trusts me (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3%
2%
12%
32%
39%
11%
1%
5%
9%
35%
42%
8%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.24, Standard dev iation: 0.885)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.15, Standard dev iation: 0.993)
Supervisory work20. I dare to disagree with my supervisor (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 257
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
5%
10%
33%
48%
2%
3%
5%
12%
34%
43%
3%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.11, Standard dev iation: 1.033)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.244, Standard dev iation: 0.944)
Supervisory work21. My supervisor is impartial and fair (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
6%
18%
33%
28%
11%
5%
8%
10%
32%
38%
7%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.951, Standard dev iation: 1.179)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.804, Standard dev iation: 1.138)
Supervisory work22. My supervisor takes the diff erences between people into consideration (for instance regarding skills, experience or abilities) (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5%
7%
15%
33%
23%
17%
3%
8%
16%
36%
26%
11%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.821, Standard dev iation: 1.064)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.752, Standard dev iation: 1.125)
Supervisory work23. I tell my supervisor about my ideas to develop our unit or my work (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
5%
14%
41%
32%
4%
4%
6%
14%
41%
33%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.946, Standard dev iation: 1.041)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.959, Standard dev iation: 1.028)
Supervisory work24. My supervisor encourages me to make suggestions, take responsibility and develop my work (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5%
12%
12%
32%
33%
7%
5%
8%
23%
31%
30%
3%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.766, Standard dev iation: 1.126)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.812, Standard dev iation: 1.196)
Work community and co-operation25. Our unit is a dynamic community of experts (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
13%
23%
39%
19%
3%
3%
9%
30%
37%
16%
5%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.563, Standard dev iation: 0.984)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.577, Standard dev iation: 1.071)
Work community and co-operation26. Our unit has a positive attitude towards development (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
9%
21%
38%
27%
1%
3%
14%
27%
34%
19%
4%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.539, Standard dev iation: 1.057)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.76, Standard dev iation: 1.073)
Work community and co-operation27. The communications practices in our unit promote effi cient communication (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
13%
13%
28%
31%
13%
2%
7%
12%
32%
35%
13%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.351, Standard dev iation: 1.074)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.192, Standard dev iation: 1.216)
Work community and co-operation28. No negative competition between individuals takes place in our unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12%
21%
21%
27%
16%
3%
8%
15%
25%
33%
11%
8%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.279, Standard dev iation: 1.13)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.138, Standard dev iation: 1.276)
Work community and co-operation29. Our unit has a constructive attitude towards human errors (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
9%
24%
36%
21%
7%
3%
7%
23%
41%
18%
8%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.702, Standard dev iation: 0.98)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.703, Standard dev iation: 1.007)
Work community and co-operation30. We have developed eff ective processes to take up diffi cult issues for discussion (Question 2010: Even diffi cult subjects are taken up for discussion in our unit) (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 133
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
7%
12%
22%
36%
17%
6%
14%
25%
20%
16%
8%
17%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.764, Standard dev iation: 1.226)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.475, Standard dev iation: 1.152)
Work community and co-operation31. We support and encourage each other (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
9%
27%
37%
21%
2%
5%
8%
32%
31%
24%
1%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.621, Standard dev iation: 1.081)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.589, Standard dev iation: 1.09)
Work community and co-operation32. It is easy for me to ask my colleagues for help (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3%
4%
14%
35%
43%
1%
2%
4%
15%
41%
38%
0%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.113, Standard dev iation: 0.902)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.111, Standard dev iation: 1.006)
Work community and co-operation33. Rumours and gossip do not interfere with work (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
12%
19%
22%
25%
18%
4%
5%
14%
24%
30%
24%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.546, Standard dev iation: 1.169)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.182, Standard dev iation: 1.291)
Work community and co-operation34. I have not been a target of workplace bullying or harassment at work over the past year (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
4%
6%
16%
65%
1%
7%
5%
6%
14%
66%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.3, Standard dev iation: 1.224)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.272, Standard dev iation: 1.24)
Competence35. Job introductions are handled well in our unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
17%
23%
26%
24%
3%
8%
10%
27%
25%
20%
8%
11%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.874, Standard dev iation: 1.139)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.718, Standard dev iation: 1.136)
Competence36. Experience and knowledge (skills, networks, contacts, finding financing) are shared systematically before people leave the unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
20%
31%
18%
13%
3%
15%
13%
26%
25%
11%
7%
20%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.664, Standard dev iation: 1.149)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.407, Standard dev iation: 1.119)
Competence37. My skills match the demands of my job (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
5%
7%
40%
46%
1%
1%
5%
10%
40%
44%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.229, Standard dev iation: 0.864)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.246, Standard dev iation: 0.901)
Competence38. I am able to effi ciently make use of my skills in my work (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5%
10%
29%
25%
28%
2%
4%
13%
20%
30%
31%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.731, Standard dev iation: 1.153)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.626, Standard dev iation: 1.148)
Competence39. I have suffi cient opportunities to develop my competence (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5%
10%
29%
25%
28%
2%
3%
8%
18%
32%
37%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.946, Standard dev iation: 1.073)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.626, Standard dev iation: 1.148)
Competence40. I know what skills will be required of me during the next few years (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0%
3%
15%
44%
35%
3%
1%
5%
14%
38%
40%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.131, Standard dev iation: 0.91)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.139, Standard dev iation: 0.796)
Competence41. Know-how is shared suffi ciently between experts (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
5%
15%
32%
28%
9%
13%
5%
12%
24%
36%
11%
13%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.414, Standard dev iation: 1.039)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.234, Standard dev iation: 1.027)
Motivation42. My contribution is important for the success of my unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
2%
8%
43%
43%
2%
1%
5%
14%
37%
41%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.162, Standard dev iation: 0.896)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.252, Standard dev iation: 0.865)
Motivation43. I have career advancement opportunities at the university (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
19%
30%
26%
12%
8%
6%
23%
23%
25%
10%
8%
12%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.53, Standard dev iation: 1.25)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.576, Standard dev iation: 1.194)
Motivation44. I gain incentive from the rewards and personal recognition I get from my unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 257
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
28%
28%
25%
8%
3%
7%
24%
29%
20%
13%
6%
8%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.434, Standard dev iation: 1.206)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.243, Standard dev iation: 1.089)
Motivation45. I am able to work independently and freely (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
4%
13%
29%
52%
0%
1%
2%
7%
42%
49%
0%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.368, Standard dev iation: 0.743)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.27, Standard dev iation: 0.942)
Motivation46. My tasks are interesting and challenging (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
7%
14%
37%
40%
0%
2%
3%
17%
36%
41%
0%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.113, Standard dev iation: 0.951)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.04, Standard dev iation: 1.023)
Motivation47. My work allows me to be inventive/creative (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
6%
14%
37%
40%
0%
2%
7%
15%
39%
37%
0%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.015, Standard dev iation: 1.0)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.024, Standard dev iation: 1.062)
Motivation48. I get a suffi cient amount of constructive feedback at work (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
16%
35%
25%
17%
1%
8%
12%
35%
30%
14%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.29, Standard dev iation: 1.113)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.298, Standard dev iation: 1.126)
Motivation49. I get support in commercializing and developing a business based on my findings (if this statement does not apply to you, select "no opinion") (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 133
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
11%
8%
5%
5%
2%
70%
13%
3%
7%
6%
1%
70%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.333, Standard dev iation: 1.354)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.263, Standard dev iation: 1.284)
Motivation50. I get support in finding project financing (if this statement does not apply to you, select "no opinion") (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 133
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
13%
13%
19%
16%
32%
6%
6%
20%
14%
24%
30%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.653, Standard dev iation: 1.267)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.326, Standard dev iation: 1.34)
Health and life situation51. I feel I have a good mental work capacity (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0%
3%
19%
38%
39%
1%
1%
2%
11%
49%
36%
2%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.191, Standard dev iation: 0.776)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.143, Standard dev iation: 0.836)
Health and life situation52. I feel I have a good physical work capacity (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
1%
6%
19%
41%
33%
1%
2%
4%
12%
49%
33%
1%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.091, Standard dev iation: 0.86)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.0, Standard dev iation: 0.911)
Health and life situation53. Retirement plans are discussed openly in my unit (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
21%
16%
19%
11%
5%
29%
24%
20%
12%
11%
8%
26%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 2.444, Standard dev iation: 1.349)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 2.489, Standard dev iation: 1.247)
Health and life situation54. My unit is prepared to accommodate people with reduced work capacity (in terms of working hours or tasks) (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
8%
13%
11%
17%
13%
39%
5%
8%
13%
24%
13%
38%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.537, Standard dev iation: 1.167)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.205, Standard dev iation: 1.342)
Health and life situation55. My unit takes the necessary measures in terms of following up on sick leaves (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
6%
12%
11%
6%
59%
4%
7%
11%
8%
9%
62%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.314, Standard dev iation: 1.288)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.154, Standard dev iation: 1.258)
Health and life situation56. The occupational health-care services support the well-being of the personnel (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3%
4%
11%
39%
20%
23%
3%
7%
13%
33%
22%
23%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.824, Standard dev iation: 1.066)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.888, Standard dev iation: 0.983)
Health and life situation57. The co-operation between HR, supervisors and OHS works smoothly (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 260
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
6%
6%
9%
25%
5%
48%
2%
8%
14%
20%
8%
50%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.448, Standard dev iation: 1.063)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.303, Standard dev iation: 1.176)
The university's image58. The quality of research in our unit (1 = Poor, 5 = Good)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
3%
9%
11%
21%
16%
40%
2%
5%
13%
23%
17%
41%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.808, Standard dev iation: 1.033)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.632, Standard dev iation: 1.176)
The university's image59. The quality of teaching in our unit (1 = Poor, 5 = Good)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0%
2%
6%
41%
20%
32%
0%
1%
8%
36%
21%
35%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.163, Standard dev iation: 0.684)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.151, Standard dev iation: 0.678)
The university's image60. Our unit's success in acquiring external financing (1 = Poor, 5 = Good)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
4%
9%
18%
16%
14%
41%
4%
6%
12%
17%
20%
42%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.727, Standard dev iation: 1.221)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.44, Standard dev iation: 1.188)
The university's image61. The university's image as an employer (1 = Poor, 5 = Good)Question answered by: 258
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
14%
32%
29%
11%
12%
2%
12%
24%
38%
8%
17%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.468, Standard dev iation: 0.923)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 3.373, Standard dev iation: 0.985)
The university's image62. The university's attractiveness to students (1 = Poor, 5 = Good)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
0%
2%
14%
43%
24%
18%
0%
3%
20%
50%
14%
13%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 3.853, Standard dev iation: 0.713)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.077, Standard dev iation: 0.733)
Equality63. Equality between genders is realized in my unit. (1 = Disagree completely, 5 = Agree completely)Question answered by: 259
1
2
3
4
5
No opinion
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
2%
3%
13%
23%
47%
13%
4%
4%
10%
19%
52%
11%
Hanken 2011 (All) (Mean: 4.265, Standard dev iation: 1.094)
Hanken 2010 (All) (Mean: 4.234, Standard dev iation: 1.009)
Your job
1 . My j ob descr i p ti on i s c l e a r and I unde rstand my go a l s
2 . My j ob i s su i tab l y cha l l eng ing
3 . I have e noug h ti me to ca rry ou t my du ti es du r i ng wo rk i ng hou rs
4 . I am ab l e to concen tra te on my j ob w i th ou t undu e d i s tu rban ce s
5 . I have e noug h i n fl u ence o ve r my o wn j ob and du ti es
6 . Cha nges a t wo rk do n o t l essen my ab i l i ty to cope a t wo rk
7 . I have the app rop r i a te too l s
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
4 .246
4 .119
3 .087
3 .102
3 .675
3 .411
3 .873
4 .352
4 .061
3 .158
3 .046
3 .667
3 .413
3 .771
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Your job
8 . The d i n i ng and o the r soc ia l a rea s a re a dequa te
9 . The ra ti o b e twee n teach in g an d resea rch wo rk i s sa ti s facto ry
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .236
3 .074
3 .099
3 .228
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Managing
10 . Th e un i ve rs i ty 's s tra tegy i s c l ea r a nd comprehe nsib l e
11 . Th e un i ve rs i ty a cts open l y wh en making and p repa r i ng dec i s i o ns
12 . Emp loyees a re ab le to i n fl uence the un i ve rs i ty 's dec i s i o ns
13 . Th e s tra tegy s te e rs the acti v i t i es and p r ima ry ta sks o f ou r un i t
14 . Men and wome n ha ve equ a l oppo r tun i t i es fo r a dva nceme n t i n ou r un i t
15 . Ou r me e ti n g p ra cti ces a re we l l su i ted fo r a ch iev in g the u n i t 's goa l s
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .447
2 .765
2 .763
3 .167
4 .19
3 .077
3 .508
2 .925
2 .737
3 .196
4 .216
3 .271
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Supervisory work
16 . My supe rv i so r makes su re tha t ou r goa l s and ta sks a re c l ea r
17 . My supe rv i so r reg u la r l y ca rr i es ou t pe r fo rmance eva l ua ti ons w i th me
18 . I ge t en ough co nstructi ve fee dback fro m my supe rv i so r
19 . My supe rv i so r trusts me
20 . I da re to d i sag re e w i th my supe rv i so r
21 . My supe rv i so r i s impa r ti a l and fa i r
22 . My supe rv i so r takes th e d i ffe rences be tween peo p le i n to con si de ra ti on ( fo r i nstance rega rd i ng sk i l l s , exp e r i en ce o r ab i l i t i e s)
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .409
3 .974
3 .418
4 .15
4 .244
3 .804
3 .752
3 .693
4 .195
3 .523
4 .24
4 .11
3 .951
3 .821
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Supervisory work
23 . I te l l my sup e rv i so r abou t my i deas to de ve lop ou r u n i t o r my wo rk
24 . My supe rv i so r e ncou rages me to make suggesti ons, take responsib i l i ty an d de ve l op my wo rk
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .959
3 .812
3 .946
3 .766
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Work community and co-operation
25 . Ou r un i t i s a d yn ami c commun i ty o f expe r ts
26 . Ou r un i t ha s a p os i ti ve a tti tude towa rd s deve l opmen t
27 . Th e commu n ica ti ons p ra cti ces i n ou r un i t p ro mo te e ffi c i en t commun i ca ti on
28 . No neg a ti ve comp e ti t i on be tween i n d i v i du a l s takes p l ace i n ou r un i t
29 . Ou r un i t ha s a con structi ve a tt i tud e towa rds h uma n e rro rs
30 . We have deve lo ped e ffe cti ve p rocesses to take u p d i ff i cu l t i ssues fo r d i scu ss io n . (Questi o n 20 10 : Even d i ff i cu l t sub je cts a re taken up fo r d i scuss io n i n ou r un i t.)
31 . We suppo r t and encou ra ge e ach o the r
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
3 .577
3 .76
3 .192
3 .138
3 .703
3 .475
3 .589
3 .563
3 .539
3 .351
3 .279
3 .702
2 .764
3 .621
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Work community and co-operation
32 . It i s easy fo r me to ask my co l l eague s fo r h e lp
33 . Ru mou rs a nd g ossi p d o no t i n te r fe re w i th wo rk
34 . I have no t been a ta rge t o f wo rkp l ace bu l l y i ng o r ha rassmen t a t w o rk ove r the past yea r
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
4 .111
3 .182
4 .272
4 .113
3 .546
4 .3
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Competence
35 . Job i n troducti ons a re hand led we l l i n ou r un i t
36 . Expe r i en ce and know l edge (sk i l l s , ne two rks, con tacts , f i nd ing fi n anc ing ) a re sha re d systema ti ca l l y b e fo re peo p le l eave the un i t
37 . My sk i l l s ma tch the d ema nds o f my j ob
38 . I am ab le to e ffi c i en tl y make u se o f my sk i l l s i n my wo rk
39 . I have su ffi c i en t opp o r tun i ti es to deve l op my compe tence
40 . I know wha t sk i l l s w i l l be requ i red o f me du r i ng th e ne xt few yea rs
41 . Know-ho w i s sh a red su ffi c i en tl y be tween expe r ts
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
2 .718
2 .407
4 .246
3 .626
3 .626
4 .139
3 .234
2 .874
2 .664
4 .229
3 .731
3 .946
4 .131
3 .414
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Motivation
42 . My con tr i bu ti on i s impo r tan t fo r the success o f my un i t
43 . I have ca re e r ad van ce men t o ppo r tu n i t i es a t the u n i ve rs i ty
44 . I ga i n i ncen ti ve fro m the rewa rds an d pe rson a l re co gn i t i on I ge t from my un i t
45 . I am ab le to w o rk i nd epend en tl y and free l y
46 . My tasks a re i n te resti n g an d cha l l en g ing
47 . My wo rk a l l ows me to be i nven ti ve /crea ti ve
48 . I ge t a su ffi c i en t amoun t o f constru cti ve feedb ack a t wo rk
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
4 .252
2 .576
2 .243
4 .27
4 .04
4 .024
3 .298
4 .162
2 .53
2 .434
4 .368
4 .113
4 .015
3 .29
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Motivation
49 . I ge t suppo r t i n comme rc i a l i z i ng a nd d eve lop ing a b usi ness ba se d on my fi nd i ngs ( i f th i s s ta temen t does no t app l y to you , se lect "no o p in i on ")
50 . I ge t suppo r t i n f i nd i ng p ro ject f i nanc in g ( i f th i s s ta temen t doe s no t app l y to you , se lect "no op in i on ")
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
2 .263
3 .326
2 .333
3 .653
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
Health and life situation
51 . I fe e l I ha ve a good me n ta l wo rk cap aci ty
52 . I fe e l I ha ve a good phys i ca l wo rk capaci ty
53 . Re ti remen t p l ans a re d i scussed o pen l y i n my u n i t
54 . My un i t i s p repa re d to accommod a te peop le w i th redu ce d wo rk cap aci ty ( i n te rms o f wo rk i ng h ou rs o r tasks)
55 . My un i t takes th e ne ce ssa ry measu res i n te rms o f fo l l ow i ng u p on s i ck l ea ve s
56 . Th e occupa ti on a l hea l th -ca re se rv i ces sup po r t the we l l -be in g o f the p e rso nne l
57 . Th e co -ope ra ti o n be twee n HR, supe rv i so rs a nd OH S works smoo th l y
1 1 .5 2 2 .5 3 3 .5 4 4 .5 5
4 .143
4
2 .489
3 .205
3 .154
3 .888
3 .303
4 .191
4 .091
2 .444
3 .537
3 .314
3 .824
3 .448
Han ke n 20 11 (Al l ) Han ke n 20 10 (Al l )
The university's image
58. The quality of research in our unit
59. The quality of teaching in our unit
60. Our unit 's success in acquir ing ex ternal f inanc ing
61. The univers ity 's image as an employer
62. The univers ity 's attrac tiveness to s tudents
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
3.632
4.151
3.44
3.373
4.077
3.808
4.163
3.727
3.468
3.853
Hanken 2011 (All) Hanken 2010 (All)
Equality
63. Equal i ty between genders is real ized in my uni t.
1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
4.234
4.265
Hanken 2011 (Al l ) Hanken 2010 (Al l )
top related