san francisco mayor’s 2030 transportation task force current & near term transportation plans...

San Francisco Mayor’s 2030 Transportation Task Force

Current & Near Term Transportation Plans

April 30, 2013

Presentation Outline

• Joint Powers Agreement• Historical Revenues and Ridership• State of Good Repair• Capital Funding Source• San Francisco Projects• Caltrain Modernization

2

Joint Powers Agreement

• 3 Member Agencies:

City and County of San Francisco (CCSF), SamTrans, and VTA• Operating based on boarding formula• Capital split 3 ways• FY2014 Operating budget balanced• FY2014 Capital budget under discussion

3

Caltrain Service

Caltrain service is in demand more than ever before• Historic ridership• More than half take Caltrain to avoid traffic• Historic-level revenues • Farebox recovery ratios:

• FY2013 YTD (Jun – Mar) = 61.60%• FY2014 Projection = 54.84%

• Capacity problems/Over crowded

4

8.099.45

10.1510.98

11.9612.69

11.9712.67

14.1315.25 15.25

$19.26$23.04

$30.38

$34.84

$40.13$43.27 $42.73

$49.03

$58.89

$64.78

$66.07

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

$0

$10

$20

$30

$40

$50

$60

$70

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014

MillionsM

illion

s

Ridership Revenue

Revenues & Ridership

5

Projected Preliminary

Caltrain State of Good Repair• Ongoing station, track, structures, signal

and rolling stock needs• Limited Federal Transit Administration

(FTA) and local funds to cover maintenance of the existing system

• Deferred maintenance due to limited funding for prior years

6

5 year State of Good Repair Needs ($ millions)

Track & Stations; $67.5

Rolling Stock, $75.1 2

Signal & Sys-

tems; $27.0

Bridges Rehab; $54.3

Total SOGR needs1: $223.9 million → $71.8 million in FTA funds1 represents projected needs 2014 to 2018, from Countywide Transportation Plan Nov. 20122 local share of Rolling Stock needs is approximately $70 million

7

FY2007 FY2008 FY2009 FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 FY2013Members 5.00 9.50 12.25 16.60 13.70 8.20 11.63Other 58.80 31.65 28.10 86.30 1.00 3.45 1.37State 5.30 4.00 67.20 58.00 7.30 8.29 6.79Federal 38.80 17.50 28.30 45.00 17.30 41.54 19.30

0

50

100

150

200

250

millions

Capital Funding by Source

8

Caltrain Modernization (Electrification)

• Distance: 51 miles (4th & King to Tamien)

• Speed: Up to 79mph• Service: 6 trains per

peak hour per direction

• Infrastructure/Vehicles– Poles and Wires (OCS)

– Traction Power Facilities (TPF)

– Electric Powered Vehicle/Electric Multiple Units (EMU)

9

Caltrain Modernization• Blended System

• Concept– Electrify / Upgrade railroad as an early

investment in High Speed Rail– Maximize use of existing tracks– Caltrain and HSR on shared tracks– Support freight and other passenger services

• Key Benefits– Minimize community impact– Lower project cost– Advance project delivery

10

Early Investment ProgramSources of Funds (in millions):

• Local - JPB (1) $ 195• State - Prop 1 A & 1B 730• Federal - FTA 500• Regional - BAQMD, Tolls

31 Total $1,456

Uses of Funds• CBOSS/Positive Train Control $ 231• Electrification 785• 96 EMU (railcars) 440

Total $1,456Note:(1) Member Agency Contributions consist of: $60M from San Mateo and Santa

Clara, $20M from San Francisco ($40M TBD) ($180M Total), $11M from currently available balance, and $4M from Caltrain PTC. 11

EMUs (Electric Multiple Units)Trainset Characteristics

• Typically 6-cars per trainset• Operating speed up to 79 mph• 100 seats per EMU• 96 EMUs• 16 Train Sets• 9,600 seats

12

QUESTIONS

13