screen tech - shaker screen case study

PtarmiganServices.com                                                                            303-­‐281-­‐9670  Support@PtarmiganServices.com

Date   5/3/15  -­‐  5/26/15   Shaker  Type Derrick  500  Series API  #  Tested Ptarmigan  170's  (4)/  Against  140's  (4)

Field   Denver-­‐Julesburg  Basin Screen  Type Derrick  500  Series Fluid  Type   Water  Based  Mud  9.7ppg

Ptarmigan   170's  (4) Ptarmigan 170's  (4)  /  140's  (4)            Current  Vendor   140's  (4)   Current  Vendor 140's  (4)  

Total  Shaker  Hours 264Total  Gallons  Screened 72600

Ptarmigan None Ptarmigan  

(3)  170's  replaced  @  4500ft  W/  3  140's.  Last  170  (1)  was  replaced  @  14,500ft  W/  (1)  140

Current  Vendor All  4  140's  pulled  of  at  end  of  well Current  Vendor New  140's  (4)  before  drilling  well

Total  Shaker  Hours 360Total  Gallons  Screened 99000

Total  Feet  Drilled   15456 Total  Feet  Drilled   15500

GPM  Over  Shakers   550 GPM  Over  Shakers   550

GPM  Distribution Competitor-­‐  50%  /  Ptarmigan-­‐  50% GPM  Distribution Competitor-­‐  50%  /  Ptarmigan-­‐  50%WBM  Weight   9.7 WBM  Weight   9.8Mud  Viscosity 36 Mud  Viscosity   43 Notes:Sweep  Viscosity  (Vis/  Wt) N/A Sweep  Viscosity  (Vis/  Wt) N/AShaker  Hours   264 Shaker  Hours   240

Not  only  were  we  able  to  outlast  the  competitors  screens  36%,  one  of  our  170's  lasted  75%  longer  (almost  twice  the  life  of  the  competitors).  

Our  Higer  API  170's  were  able  to  outlast  the  competitors  API  140's  on  shaker  hours  and  gallons  screend

Case  Study  

Screen  Test  Overview

Screens  Replaced Screens  Replaced  

RESULTS

Competitor's  First  4-­‐  140's

Well  #  1  Info Well  #  2  Info

Ptarmigan's  First  3-­‐  API  170's  

LONGER  LIFE

Ptarmigan 36%

WELL  #1 Well  #  2