simulated radar measurements in nwp-model validation carl fortelius

Post on 08-Jan-2016

33 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

DESCRIPTION

Simulated radar measurements in NWP-model validation Carl Fortelius Finnish Meteorological Institute. Contents: 1. What are simulated radar measurements 2. Why are they needed 3. What do they tell. Special thanks to: Günther Haase and DWD for the RSM code Harri Hohti for radar data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

02/10/02 1

Simulated radar measurements in NWP-model validation

Carl ForteliusFinnish Meteorological Institute

02/10/02 1

Contents:

1. What are simulated radar measurements

2. Why are they needed

3. What do they tell

02/10/02 1

Special thanks to:

Günther Haase and DWD for the RSM code

Harri Hohti for radar data

Sami Niemelä for Hirlam output

02/10/02 1

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

02/10/02 1

Volume backscatteringcoefficient (Mie)

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

02/10/02 1

Radar ray propagation,extinction

Volume backscatteringcoefficient (Mie)

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

02/10/02 1

Radar ray propagation,extinction

Volume backscatteringcoefficient (Mie)

Simulated measurements:PPI, RHI,statistics,...

3D NWP model output:T, q, hydrometeors

02/10/02 1

Example: Comparing two parameterizations of convectionand moist physics in HIRLAM

02/10/02 1

Example: Comparing two parameterizations of convectionand moist physics in HIRLAM

Model: HIRLAM 5.0.0Resolution: 40 levels, 5.5 kmExperiments (Sami Niemelä, Univ. Helsinki):

HHS: Reference version HHK: ''STRACO'' replaced by ''RKKF''

Boundaries & initial state: FMI operational analyses (31 levels, 22 km)

02/10/02 1

Example: Comparing two parameterizations of convectionand moist physics in HIRLAM

Model: HIRLAM 5.0.0Resolution: 40 levels, 5.5 kmExperiments (Sami Niemelä, Univ. Helsinki):

HHS: Reference version HHK: ''STRACO'' replaced by ''RKKF''

Boundaries & initial state: FMI operational analyses (31 levels, 22 km)

Radars: Gematronik 5.6 GHz, Sigmet signal processingVantaa, Ikaalinen, Anjalankoski

02/10/02 1

Analysis 25 May 2001 12 UTC

Model domain and composite area

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

02/10/02 1

Conclusions

NWP-models produce realistic(?) reflectivity distributions

RSM only (?) way to verify vertically distributed hydrometeors

RSM brings out differences between alternative model formulationswhen traditional methods fail

RSM is computationally demanding

top related