state aviation administration of ukraine · state aviation administration of ukraine views of...
Post on 23-Aug-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
State Aviation Administration of Ukraine
Views of neighboring country to the EU: needs, expectations, perspectives,
achievements
Presented by Dmytro Babeichuk Director ATM/ANS & ER
Implementation of the Single European Sky and its extension to Third countries
Warsaw, 28.11.20111
2
State of play in the Ukraine-EU relations (basic elements)
Association Agreement between Ukraine and the EU
Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area
Visa free dialogue
Common Aviation Area Agreement
Extends over a large area adjacent to the EU airspace
and non-EUROCONTROL area
Connecting routes to/from Europe, Asia, Middle East & Russia
Ukraine’s future ATM concept to be oriented on SES principles:
Efficient routings
Increased ATM capacity
Safety targets
Ukrainian Airspace
3
Ukrainian FIRs
4
Dnipropetrovs’k 165 509 sq.km
Simferopol’209 337 sq.km
Odesa 81 832 sq.km
L’viv138 365 sq.km
Kyiv181 399 sq.km
ACC - 5APP - 6Tower -31Briefings - 8ARO - 24
FIR total area - 776 442 sq. kmTotal length of routes - 50 397 kmTotal number of routes - 171
Traffic Statistics
5
050
100150200250300350400450500
Domestic flightsInternational flights Overflights
20102010:: 457 445457 4452010/2009: + 15,2%
2009: 397 0922009/2008: - 5,3%
Domestic flights8,3%
International flights
25,9%
Overflights65,8%
Ukrainian Civil Aviation statistics
AOC (35 commercial + 43 aerial works)
Aerodromes (40)
ANSP (UkSATSE)
Maintenance Organizations (141)
Training Entities (11)
Industrial Stakeholders DOA+POA (25+21)
Antonov Design Bureau
Airworthy Aircraft (850)
6
New Air Code of UkraineSystem of regulations related to civil and state aviation through State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU) and Ministry of DefenseProvides direct authorization to the Chairman of SAAU Establishes an independent Expert Agency on Air Accidents Investigation from 1 Jan 2012Establishes State Inspectors Institute on safety oversightIntroduces “Just culture” provisionsIntroduces penalty system for aviation regulation violation by entity / individualIncludes new requirements of air carrier liability towards passengersContains General Aviation RegulationIntroduces Airport and Aerodrome RegulationIntroduces provisions on environmental protectionIntroduces the Qualified Entities Development of national regulations in accordance with EU, ICAO, EUROCONTROL requirements 7
Envisaged Benefits for non-EU States resulted by SES
Improvement of ANS efficiency, routes optimization and increased ATM capacityUniformity within the pan-European Air Transport Network:
Airspace design and service provisionInteroperability/Integrity of ANS systems and proceduresHarmonized ATM safety oversight within existing frameworkCharging schemes
Reduction of delays at FIR/ACC boundaries via:Elimination of differences in ANS performance Effective ANSP’s cooperation
8
Specific issues of SES Implementation for non-EU States
SES as an EU initiative may result differences between the SES and non-SES States
Lack of efficient involvement of non – EU States into all kinds of activities (SSC/rulemaking, SESAR/SJU, NCP, etc.)
Need for the Comprehensive Aviation Agreements with EU (ECAA)
EU legislation does not directly applicable and not binding
Harmonization of legislation is necessary
EUROCONTROL plays a vital role in this process though EUROCONTROL / EU relationship is not yet formalized
9
Recognize the specific situation of non-EU MSSupport SES Implementation regional planningCover non-EU MS needs aimed at ATM concept design and synchronized implementation (SESAR)Ensure the non-EU MS involvement in operational and technical trialsGrant rights for non–EU States in SSC/rulemaking, EASA/OVS/CERT, SESAR/SJU, NCP, NMB, PRB etc.Find solution to avoid double cost of ATM/ANS inspections/oversight activities
10
Common Role for EU and EUROCONTROL
Role of EUROCONTROL
Adopt SES related legislation, procedures, operational & technical specifications
Develop recommendations on State’s specific problems related to the SES Implementation
Assist non-EU MS in SES Implementation processes (to establish State Office for Pan-European SES Implementation)
Establish target performance scheme (transition targets) for non-EU MS
Perform a Gap Analysis for individual non-EU MS
Allocate required resources in the Agency BP & Budget
11
High Level Agreement (HLA) between EU and EUROCONTROLHLA should establish legal basis for complementary mutual
cooperation and specify its scope EUROCONTROL should support EU in SES implementation
within and beyond the EU
EUROCONTROL’s new organizational structure and functions to be further adapted to implement SES strategy
HLA should not become a revision of the EUROCONTROL Convention as it may affect non-EU States’rights
HLA to be implemented in transparent manner
12
Pan-European performance targets Participation of all SES and non-SES States is important to
achieve a genuine efficient Pan-European network
EUROCONTROL - to develop Guidance Material by mid-2013 for RP2 (including specific elements for non-EU States)
EUROCONTROL - to review the Pan-European performance targets taking into account latest data (forecasts) for particular non-EU Member State
Non-EU States - use RP1 as a transitional training and learning period focusing on the monitoring of the defined PIs with the intention of target setting in RP2
13
Safety Oversight & Standardisation
Non-EU States concluded Working Arrangements with EASA:
Current WA reflect post JAA situation
Serve implementing EU Regulations and Standardization : part of transition phase after conclusion of ECAA Agreement
Flexible approach is necessary in the ATM/ANS safety area to proceed with WA amendments
Outstanding issues between EUROCONTROL and EASA to be formally resolved
14
ESIMS
Based on EUROCONTROL Convention, regulations and common practices
ESIMS to be recognized by EU/EASA as an appropriate and sufficient part of EU standardization system
Existing approach of safety related activities/audits for ECTL MS (ESIMS) to be preserved during transition
Synergy of ESIMS and EASA standardization
Further recognition EUROCONTROL expertise, and granting the equal rights to non-EU EUROCONTROL MS within EASA ATM regulatory activities
15
Additional Measures to ensure Non-EU MS interests (2)
27 EU Member States
39 EUROCONTROL
Member States (non-EU/12)
EU/EC
EUROCONTROL
HLA
ECAAagreement
Annual meetingEU Transport
Council&
EUROCONTROL PC/CN
JointCommittee
RepresentativesEU /ECTL
16
Exciting EU/EUROCONTROL assistance in sphere of aviation for Ukraine
TEN-T “Support to the integration of Ukraine in the Trans-European Transport Network TEN-T ”
Twinning “Support the implementation of the Norms and Standards of the EU in the Spheres of Airports, Aerodromes and Air Traffic Management / Air Navigation Services (ATM/ANS”
TRACECA Civil Aviation Safety and Security Project
Agreement between SAAU and EUROCONTROL on the provision of support for the assessment of the status of Ukraineconcerning SES implementation
17
Conclusions:
EUROCONTROL continues supporting Non-EU Members within the development of Pan- European Network
Maintain EUROCONTROL’s regulatory function as appropriate for non- ECAA EUROCONTROL MS
Retain EUROCONTROL as Intergovernmental OrganizationAllocate required resources in the Agency BP & BudgetSmooth and gradual integration into the SES to be reflected in
HLA to ensure the Pan-European dimension and protect the interests of Non-EU States
Non-EU countries should seek an active involvement in FABs, at least by having direct bilateral relations
EU to continue practice of targeted support and grant non-EU MS States access to SES governance structures (SSC, NMB) and advisory forums ( e.g. NSA coordination platform)
18
Conclusions:
Non-EU countries should seek an active involvement in FABs, at least by having direct bilateral relations
EU to continue practice of targeted support and grant non-EU MS States access to SES governance structures (SSC, NMB) and advisory forums ( e.g. NSA coordination platform)
EASA and non-EU MS to finalize the WA amendments to allow a smooth transition of the new ATM/ANS inspection system at a pan-European level
An ECAA or comparable agreement is an important instrument to formalize the links with SES
States that experience difficulties related to the existence of double / multiple regulations may apply to those norms which allow them to ensure the required level of safety and performance
19
Thank You for Attention!
20
Dmytro BabeichukE-mail: babeichuk@avia.gov.uatel +380 44 461 50 44fax +380 44 461 53 72
top related