stipulated conditions of environmental clearance...(reliance got separate ec for this land for...
Post on 15-May-2021
2 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Stipulated Conditions of Environmental Clearance
(December 2018)
FOR
Industrial Building of Panasonic India Ltd.
At
Jhajjar, Haryana
For Submission to:
Ministry of Environment and Forests Climate Change (MoEFCC)
Submitted by:
M/s Panasonic India Ltd
ABW Tower, IFFCO Chowk,
M.G.Road, Sector-25, Gurgaon
2
INDEX
CHAPTER DESCRIPTION Page No.
Chapter 1 Introduction 3-4
Chapter 2 Compliance of stipulated conditions of Environment Clearance
5-10
Chapter 3 Details of Environmental Monitoring
11-29
3
Chapter -1 Introduction
1.1 Introduction
M/s. Panasonic India Ltd., had proposed Industrial Building at plot-1, Jhajjhar (Haryana),
had granted Environmental clearance on 19/12/2011, revise EC letter reference no-
SEIAA/HR/2013/295, dated 17.06.2013.This project has been granted environmental
clearance by the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority, Haryana.
1.2 Purpose of the Report
As per the “Sub Para (i)” of “Para 10” of EIA Notification 2006, it is stated that “It shall be mandatory for the project proponent to submit half-yearly compliance report in respect of the stipulated prior environmental clearance terms and conditions in hard and soft copies to the concerned regulatory authority as per compliance condition mentioned in Environment Clearance Letter. The regulatory authorities in this case are SEIAA, Punchkula, MoEF& CC, Chandigarh and HSPCB, Panchkula. Various scheduled Site Visits were conducted by a team of Experts to Monitor Pollution related parameters as defined by CPCB / HSPCB. Samples for water and soil were also collected by NABL/ MoEF approved laboratory for analysis. Based on the Specific and General Conditions mentioned in the EC Letter, a Compliance Report has been prepared and submitted regularly to the authority. The Environmental assessment has been carried out to verify:
1) The proposed project has not any adverse effect on the project site as well as it’s surrounding.
2) There is compliance with the conditions stipulated in the Environmental Clearance Letter.
3) The Project proponent is implementing the environmental safeguards in true spirit.
4) The non-conformity in the project with respect to the environmental implication of the project.
5) The project proponent is implementing the environmental pollution mitigative measures as suggested in approved Form-1 and Form – 1A, Environmental Management Plan and Building Plan.
4
1.3 Methodology for Preparation of Report is as follows:
1) Study of EC Letter & Related Documents,
2) Site Visits by a Team of Experts,
3) Monitoring of Environment Parameters, viz. Ambient Air, Water, Noise & Soil by the NABL/Moef labs
4) Interpretation of Monitoring Results.
5) Preparation of half yearly Environmental Compliance Report.
1.4 Generic Structure of Report:
1) Purpose of the Report, explaining the need of a Compliance Report and Methodology Adopted for preparation of Report.
2) Compliance Report, explaining the entire General & specific conditions in the EC Letter and providing details w.r.t. each condition/ guideline.
3) Monitoring Reports & Analysis, showing the level of emission within the project site for various Environment Parameters.
4) Photographs showing status of the project and site.
5) Supporting Documents which are mandatory for the project.
5
Chapter -2
Compliance of stipulated conditions of Environment Clearance
PART A: CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Note- Our Project is now in operation phase from December-2012, we had already agreed all construction phase condition stipulated in Environment clearance, now condition are not applicable for us. So please consider as completed.
PART B: OPERATION PHASE
S. No Conditions of Environmental Clearance Status of Compliance
1 The installation STP should be certified by an
independent expert and a report in this regard
should be submitted to the Ministry before the
project is commissioned for operation. Discharge
of treated sewage shall conform to the standards
of the Haryana State Pollution Control Board,
Panchkula.
Sewage Treatment Plant of adequate capacity
has been installed and treated effluents are
being recycled to achieve zero discharge.
2. Rain water harvesting for roof run-off and
surface run-off as per plan submitted should be
implemented. Before recharging the surface
runoff, pre runoff treatment must be done to
remove suspended matter oil and grease.
All measures for Rain water harvesting have
been implemented.
3.
The solid waste generated should be properly
collected and segregated before disposal to the
City Municipal Facility. The In-vessel bio-
conversion technique should be used for
composting the organic waste.
Solid waste generated from the project
mainly in the form of domestic waste. This
waste is being properly segregated and
organic waste converted into bio compost,
manure use for gardening purpose for soil
fertility.
6
S. No Conditions of Environmental Clearance Status of Compliance
4. Any hazardous waste including biomedical
waste should be disposal of as per applicable
Rules & norms with necessary approvals of
Haryana State Pollution Control Board.
All hazardous waste should be disposed of as
per applicable Rules & norms of Central
Pollution Control Board.
5. The green belt design along the periphery of the
plot shall achieve attenuation factor conforming
to the day and night noise standards prescribed
for residential land use. The open spaces inside
the plot should be suitably landscaped and
covered with vegetation of indigenous variety.
Variety of trees and other species of herbs
have been planted in the project area and
green belt maintained as per requirement to
reduce pollution and healthy environment
measure.
6 Incremental pollution loads on the ambient air
quality, noise and water quality should be
periodically monitored after commissioning of
the project.
Environment monitoring has been carried out
every quarter, test result are attached in this
report as Annexure 1.
7 Application of solar energy should be
incorporated for illumination of common areas.
Lighting for gardens and street lighting in
addition to provision for solar water heating. A
hybrid system if fully solar system for a portion
of the apartment should be utilized.
29 KW solar systems installed at factory
common area for lighting purpose,
photograph of solar system attached in the
report.
8 Traffic congestion near the entry and exit points
from the roads adjoining the proposed project
site must be avoided. Parking should be fully
internalized and no public space should be
utilized.
Due to the separate entry and exit points,
there shall be no traffic congestion near the
entry or exit point, separate parking
arrangement for staff and visitor vehicles.
9 A report on the energy conservation measures
confirming to energy conservation norms by
Bureau of Energy Efficiency should be prepared
incorporating details about building materials
The report of energy conservation has been
prepared and submitted to the Regional office
of MoEF & CC.
7
S. No Conditions of Environmental Clearance Status of Compliance
&technology; R & U factors etc and submit to the
Ministry in the three month time.
10 The Project proponent shall get the study of
ground water table/level and quality of ground
water every 2 years and seek fresh permission
from CGWA for further extraction of ground
water, it is further clarified that from DC Jhajjar.
The project proponent shall use water for
horticulture instead of fresh water.
Same should be obeyed and if further
extraction of ground water is required, we
will seek fresh permission from CGWA.
NOC from CGWA enclosed as Annexure-2.
11 The project proponent shall increase the
frequency of monitoring and shall monitor the
data quarterly.
Noted.
12 Hazardous Waste from RO plant shall be
disposed off as per the Hazardous waste
(Management & Handling) Rules-1989 as
amended to date.
Hazardous waste generated from RO plant is
disposed at GEPIL Faridabad, Haryana as per
HSPCB guideline.
13 Proper rainwater harvesting shall be carried out
and disposal of storm water shall not be made
outside the premises without approval from
concerned authority.
In the project area, proper rain water
harvesting pit constructed and over flow
storm water is drained in Reliance drain.
(Reliance got separate EC for this land for
additional measure).
14 The project proponent shall conduct quarterly
medical checkup of villagers in 5km radius from
corporate Environment Responsibility (CER)
fund for pollution related diseases.
One special medical Van has been arranged
for nearby villagers. Panasonic mobile van
visit nearby villages, and organize health
checkup camp, and from time to time
organize health camp for nearby villagers.
8
PART B – GENERAL CONDITIONS
S. No. Conditions of Environmental Clearance
Status of Compliance
1 Monitoring reports should be submitted to the
Ministry and its Regional Office, Chandigarh
We are regularly submitting monitoring
result in six monthly reports to the Regional
Office, Chandigarh.
2. Officials from the Regional Office of MoEF,
Chandigarh who would be Monitoring the
implementation of Environmental safeguards
should be given full cooperation facilities and
documents/data etc. by the project proponent
during their inspection. Complete set of all
documents submitted to SEIAAs shall be
forwarded to the Regional Office of MoEF, GOl,
and Chandigarh.
We will provide full cooperation facilities and
documents/data etc. to the Officials from the
Regional Office of MoEF, Chandigarh who
would be monitoring the implementation of
Environmental safeguards during their
inspection. A complete set of all the
documents submitted to MoEF has been
Forwarded to the CCF, Regional Office of
MoEF, and Chandigarh.
3 In case of any change in the scope of the project
the project would require a fresh appraisal by
Ministry.
In case of any other changes in scope of the
project, we will apply for fresh appraisal.
4. The Ministry reserves the right to add additional
safeguard measures subsequently ,if found
necessary, and to take action including revoking
of the environmental clearance under the
provisions of the
Environmental(Protection)Act,1986 to ensure
effective implementation of the suggested
safeguard measures in a time bound and
satisfactory manner.
Agreed. The Ministry reserves all the rights
and can take action including revoking of the
environmental clearance under the provisions
of the Environmental(Protection)Act,1986
5. All other statutory clearance such as the
approvals for storage of diesel from Chief
Controller of Explosive, Fire Department, Civil
Noted.
9
S. No. Conditions of Environmental Clearance
Status of Compliance
Aviation Department, Forest Conservation Act,
1980 and wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972
etc.shall be obtained as applicable by project
proponents from the competent authorities.
6. A copy of the clearance letter shall be sent by the
proponent to concerned Panchayat, Zila
Parishad/Municipal Corporation, Urban local
body and the local NGO, if any from whom
suggestions/ representation, if any were
received while processing the proposal. The
clearance letter shall also be put on the website
of the Company by the proponent.
Copy of EC letter submitted to concerned
gram Panchayat Samiti and Zillah Parishad.
7. The project proponent should advertise in at
least two local Newspapers widely circulated in
the region, one of which shall be in the
vernacular language informing that the project
has been accorded environmental clearance and
copies of clearance letter are available with the
Haryana State Pollution Control Board and may
also be seen on the website of the Ministry of
Environmental and Forests at
http:/www.enviro.nic.in.The advertisement
should be made within 7 days from the day of
issue of the clearance letter and a copy of the
same should be forwarded to Regional office of
this Ministry at Chandigarh.
Complied. Advertisements placed in local
Hindi Daily namely Dainik Bhaskar
Chandigarh dated 29.12.11 (at page No. 12)
and English Daily The Tribune Chandigarh
Dated 29.12.11 (at page No. 05), and copy of
newspaper provided to the MoEF & CC
regional office Chandigarh.
8. These stipulations would be enforced among
others, under the provisions of Water
Noted.
10
S. No. Conditions of Environmental Clearance
Status of Compliance
(Prevention and Control of Pollution) act, 1981,
the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the
Public Liability (Insurance) Act-1991, Forest
Conservation Act, 1980 and EIA notification
2006.
9. Under the provisions of Environment
(Protection) Act 1986 legal action shall be
initiated against the project proponent if it was
found that construction of the project has been
started without obtaining environmental
clearance.
No construction activities related to the
project was started before obtaining
environmental clearance.
10 The project proponent shall also submit six
monthly reports on the status of compliance of
the stipulated EC conditions including results of
monitoring data(both in hard copies as well as
by email)to the respective Regional office of
MoEFCC, the respective Office of CPCB and SPCB.
Six monthly reports in respect of compliance
status of the stipulated EC conditions,
including results of monitored data (both in
hard copies as well as by email) submitted to
the MoEF & CC and other representative
offices from time to time.
11. Environmental clearance is subject to final order
of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the
matter of Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India in
Writ Petition (Civil) N0.460 of 2004 as may be
applicable to this project.
Same should be obeyed.
11
Chapter -3
Details of Environmental Monitoring
3.1 Details of Environmental Monitoring
3.2 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING
3.2.1 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations
Ambient air quality monitoring has been carried out at three locations (three
directions), one being near the gate no-1 (factory main gate), other are near utility
area and gate-2 of the site to assess the ambient air. This will enable to have a
comparative analytical understanding about air quality and the changes in the air
environment in the study area with respect to the condition prevailing. The
locations of the ambient air quality monitoring stations are given in Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Details of Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Stations
S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description Environmental Setting
1. AAQ-1 Factory Gate-01 Industrial unit
2. AAQ-2 Factory gate-02 Industrial unit
3. AAQ-3 Factory Utility Area Industrial unit
12
AAQ-1: Factory Gate-01
The Air quality monitoring sampler was placed near factory main gate and follows the
scientific methodology for sampling.
AAQ-2: Factory gate-02
The sampler was placed near gate no-02
AAQ-3: Factory Utility Area
This location is Factory Utility Area.
3.2.2 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Methodology
The duration of sampling of PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NOx, CO was 24 hourly continuous
sampling .The monitoring was conducted for one day at each location. This is to allow a
comparison with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. The air samples were
analyzed as per standard methods specified by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and
IS: 5182.
Fine Particulate Sampler FPS instruments have been used for monitoring Particulate Matter 2.5 (PM2.5 i.e. <2.5 microns), and Respirable Dust Sampler APM 860 was used for sampling Respirable fraction (<10 microns), gaseous pollutants like SO2, and NOx. Bladder and Aspirator bags were used for collection Carbon monoxide samples. Gas Chromatography techniques have been used for the estimation of CO.
Table 3.2 Techniques used for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
S. No. Parameter Technique Technical Protocol
1 Particulate Matter 2.5 Fine Particulate Sampler, Gravimetric Method
#SOP No. VEL/SOP/01, Section No. SP 63
2 Particulate Matter 10 Respirable Dust Sampler, with cyclone separator, Gravimetric Method
IS-5182 (Part-23)
3 Sulphur dioxide Modified West and Gaeke IS-5182 (Part- II)
4 Oxides of Nitrogen Jacob &Hochheiser IS-5182 (Part-VI)
5 Carbon Monoxide Gas Chromatography IS-5182 (Part-X)
# SOP - As per Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure.
13
3.2.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results
The detailed on-site monitoring results of PM 2.5, PM 10, SO2, NOx, CO are
presented in Table 3.3.
Table 3.3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results
S. No. PARAMETERS AAQ1 AAQ2 AAQ3 NAAQS*
1 Particulate Matter (PM2.5) 49.2 50.6 42.6 60
2 Particulate Matter(PM10) 83.4 89.1 85.9 100
3 Nitrogen Dioxide(NO2) 22.6 26.9 25.2 80
4 Sodium Dioxide(SO2) 12.7 10.2 9.04 80
5 Carbon Monoxide(CO) 0.69 0.72 0.70 4
*NAAQS – National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Schedule-VII, [Rule 3 (3B)], [Part-II-sec.-3(i)] 18.11.2009
3.2.4 Discussion on Ambient Air Quality in the Study Area
Pollution levels at the factory area not exceed the permissible limit of NAAQ. Whereas
PM-10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, CO. was observed within the corresponding stipulated limits
(Limit for PM-100μg/m3, PM2.5 is 60μg/m3, SO2 and NOx: 80 g/m3) at all monitoring
locations.
14
3.2.5 Stack Monitoring
Table 3.4 Details of Stack Monitoring Stations
S. No. Location Code DG Capacity Location
1. DG1 750 KVA C1 Block
2. DG2 500 KVA D2 Block
3. DG3 750 KVA C2 Block
4. DG4 750 KVA C1 Block
5. DG5 750 KVA C1 Block
6. DG6 380 KVA C1 Block
7. DG7 250 KVA B Block
8. DG8 250 KVA B Block
9. DG9 160 KVA A Block
10. DG10 160 KVA A Block
15
Table- 3.5 DG Stack monitoring Result (last two quarter data)
Parameter PM-(g/Kwh) NOx-(g/Kwh) (CH4) -(g/Kwh) CO-(g/Kwh)
LC-DG01 0.076 0.74 0.27 0.24
LC-DG02 0.076 0.65 0.23 0.33
LC-DG03 0.087 0.62 0.38 0.22
LC-DG04 0.068 0.59 0.44 0.36
LC-DG05 0.083 0.66 0.41 0.36
LC-DG06 0.064 0.40 0.35 0.37
LC-DG07 0.054 0.58 0.22 0.20
LC-DG08 0.077 0.53 0.32 0.36
LC-DG09 0.071 0.69 0.40 0.51
LC-DG10 0.065 0.76 0.39 0.53
Limit (As Per CPCB)
≤0.2g/KWh ≤4.0g/KWh ≤4.0g/KWh ≤3.5g/KWh
16
3.3 AMBIENT NOISE MONITORING
3.3.1 Ambient Noise Monitoring Locations
The main objective of noise monitoring in the study area is to assess the present
ambient noise levels in factory site due to various operational allied activities and
increased vehicular movement and operations of machine. A preliminary
reconnaissance survey has been undertaken to identify the major noise generating
sources in the area. Ambient noise monitoring was conducted at one location at the
main gate of the factory, as given in Table 3.6
Table 3.6 Details of Ambient Noise Monitoring Stations
S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description Environmental Setting
1. N1 Factory Gate-01 Industrial unit
2. N2 Factory gate-02 Industrial unit
3. N3 Factory Utility Area Industrial unit
3.3.2 Methodology of Noise Monitoring
Noise levels were measured using integrated sound level meter manufactured by
Quest Technologies. The integrating sound level meter is an integrating/ logging
type with Octave filter attachment with frequency range of 31.5 to 16000 Hz. This
instrument is capable of measuring the Sound Pressure Level (SPL), Leq and octave
band frequency analysis.
Noise level monitoring was carried out continuously for 24-hours with one hour
interval starting at 6.00 am hrs. to 6.00 am hrs. The noise levels were monitored on
working day only. During each hour Leq were directly computed by the instrument
based on the sound pressure levels. Lday (Ld), Lnight (Ln) and Ldn values were
computed using corresponding hourly Leq.
17
3.3.3 Ambient Noise Monitoring Results
The location wise ambient noise monitoring results is summarized in Table 3.7
Table- 3.7 Ambient Noise Monitoring Result (Last two quarter)
Location Code
N1 N2 N3
Day Time Night Time
Day Time Night Time
Day Time Night Time
Lmax 69.8 54.7 65.2 57.2 66.9 55.9
Lmin 46.8 37.2 45.3 38.4 43.6 35.9
Leq 54.31 43.68 52.69 42.10 58.31 49.67
CPCB Limits in dB(A) Leq (Silence Zone)
75.0 70.0 75.0 70.0 75.0 70.0
3.3.4 Discussion on Ambient Noise Levels in the Study Area
Day Time Noise Levels (Leq-day):
The day time noise level at all the locations were found to within limits prescribed
for Industrial Building area i.e. 75 dB (A).
Night Time Noise Levels (Leq-night):
The night time noise level at all the locations were found to within limit prescribed
for Industrial Building i.e. 70 dB (A).
18
3.4 GROUND WATER QUALITY MONITORING
3.4.1 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Locations
Keeping in view the importance of ground water, sample was collected from near
project for the assessment.
The sample was analyzed for various parameters. Details of water sampling
locations are given in Table 3.8
Table 3.8 Details of Water Quality monitoring location
S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description
1. GW Near Project Site
3.4.2 Methodology of Ground Water Monitoring
Sampling of Ground water was carried out from the near project site, collected and
sampling forms are filled in as per the sampling plan. Sample for chemical analysis
was collected in polyethylene carboys. Sample collected for metal content were
acidified to <2 pH with 1 ml HNO3. A sample for bacteriological analysis was
collected in sterilized glass bottles.
Soon after the completion of sampling, chain of custody sheets for the samples are
filled in and then they were transported by road to laboratory for further analysis.
Proper care was taken during packing and transportation of samples. After ensuring
the same the samples were forwarded immediately for analysis.
The samples were analyzed as per the standard procedures specified in 'Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater' published by American
Public Health Association (APHA) and CPCB. The analytical techniques and the test
methods adopted for testing of ground water are given in Table 2.9
19
3.4.3 Ground Water Quality Monitoring Results The detailed Drinking Water quality
monitoring results are presented in Table 3.9
S.
No. Parameter Test-Method Result Unit
Limits of IS:10500 -2012 Requir
ement (Accept
able Limits)
Permissible limit in the Absence of Alternate
Source 1. pH (at 25 0C) APHA ,4500-H+ B Electrometric
Method
7.56 -- 6.5 to
8.5
No Relaxation
2. Colour APHA ,2120 B, Visual Comparison
Method
*BDL (**DL 5Hazen) Hazen 5 15
3. Turbidity APHA, 2130 B, Nephlelometric
Method
*BDL (**DL 0. 1 NTU) NTU 1 5
4. Odour APHA, 2150 B , Threshold Test
Method
Agreeable -- Agreeab
le
Agreeable
5. Taste APHA , 2160 B, Threshold Test
Method
Agreeable -- Agreeab
le
Agreeable
6. Total Hardness as
CaCO3
APHA , 2340 C, EDTA Titrimetric
Method
152.76 mg/l 200 600
7. Calcium as Ca APHA, 3500 Ca B, EDTA Titrimetric
Method
37.56 mg/l 75 200
8. Alkalinity as CaCO3 APHA , 2320 B, Titrimetric Method 135.00 mg/l 200 600
9. Chloride as Cl APHA, 4500-Cl- B, Argentometric
Method
42.60 mg/l 250 1000
10. #Cyanide as CN APHA , 4500 CN- D *BDL(**DL 0.02 mg/l) mg/l 0.05 No
Relaxation 11. Magnesium as Mg APHA , 3500 Mg B, Calculation
Method
14.35
mg/l 30 100
12. Total Dissolved
Solids
APHA , 2540 C, Gravimetric Method 298.00 mg/l 500 2000
13. Sulphate as SO4 APHA , 4500 E, Turbidimetric
Method
17.45 mg/l 200 400
14. Fluoride as F APHA , 4500-F- D, SPADNS Method 0.79 mg/l 1.0 1.5
15. Nitrate as NO3 IS 3025 (P-34) ,Chromotropic
Method
1.89 mg/l 45 No Relaxation
16. Iron as Fe APHA , 3500-Fe B 1,10
Phenanthroline Method
0.39 mg/l 0.3 No relaxation
17. #Aluminium as Al APHA , 3111 B *BDL(**DL 0.03
mg/l)
mg/l 0.03 0.2
18. Boron APHA, 4500B C, Carmine Method 0.38 mg/l 0.5 1
19. Total Chromium as
Cr
APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air, Acetylene Flame Method
*BDL(**DL 0.03 mg/l) mg/l 0.05 No Relaxation
20. Phenolic
Compounds
APHA, 5530 C Chloroform Extraction
Method
*BDL(**DL 0.001
mg/l)
mg/l 0.001 0.002
21. #Mineral Oil Clause 6 of IS:3025(Part 39) *BDL(**DL 0.01mg/l) mg/l 0.5 No Relaxation 22. Anionic Detergents as
MBAS
APHA, 5540 C MBAS Method *BDL(**DL 0.02 mg/l) mg/l 0.2 1.0
23. Zinc as Zn APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,
Acetylene Flame Method
0.68 mg/l 5 15
24. Copper as Cu APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,
Acetylene Flame Method
0.24 mg/l 0.05 1.5
25. Manganese as Mn APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,
Acetylene Flame Method
*BDL(**DL 0.06
mg/l)
mg/l 0.1 0.3
26. Cadmium as Cd APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,
Acetylene Flame Method
*BDL mg/l 0.003 No Relaxation
27. Lead as Pb APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air,
Acetylene Flame Method
*BDL mg/l 0.01 No Relaxation
28. #Selenium as Se APHA , 3114 B, Manual Hydride
Generation
*BDL(**DL 0.01 mg/l) mg/l 0.01 No Relaxation
29. #Arsenic as As APHA , 3114 B, Manual Hydride
Generation
*BDL(**DL 0.01
mg/l)
mg/l 0.01 0.05
30. #Mercury as Hg APHA , 3111 B, Direct Air, Acetylene
Flame Method
*BDL (**DL 0.001
mg/l)
mg/l 0.001 No Relaxation
31. Total Coliform IS 1622,1981(Reaffirmed 2003) <2 MPN/100
ml
Shall not be detectable in any 100 ml sample
32. E. Coli IS 1622,1981(Reaffirmed 2003) Absent MPN/100
ml
Shall not be detectable in any 100 ml sample
20
3.4.4 Discussion on Ground Water Quality in the Study Area
Ground Water Quality in the Study Area has all the parameters within acceptable
limits and it is fit for drinking purpose.
21
3.5 WASTE WATER QUALITY MONITORING
3.5.1 Waste water Quality Monitoring Locations
Sample of waste water was collected from the project site for the assessment of impacts of
the project on discharge point.
Waste water sample was collected from factory ETP & STP location. The details of waste
water sampling locations are given in Table 3.10
Table 3.10 Details of Waste Water Quality Monitoring
S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description
1. WW 1 Treated sewage water from STP
2. WW 2 Treated effluent water from ETP
3.5.2 Waste water Quality Results
Table: 3.11Treated sewage Result
*General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants (Part A): Effluents, as given in Schedule –VI, inserted by Rule 2(d) of
Environment (Protection) Second Amendment Rules, 1993 notified by GSR 422(E) dated 19.05.1993 published in Gazette no. 174 dated
19.05.1993.
S.
No. Parameter Test-Method Result Unit
*Standards
In-Land Surface Water
Public Sewers
Land for Irrigation
1. pH (at 25 0C) APHA, 4500-H+ B Electrometric
Method 7.52
-- 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0
2. COD APHA, 5220 B Open Reflux Method
135.20 mg/l 250 -- --
3. BOD (3 Days at 27
0C) APHA 5210 C / IS 3025,P-44,
25.03 mg/l 30 350 100
4. Total Suspended
Solids APHA, 2540 D Gravimetric Method 32.60
mg/l 100 600 200
5. Oil and Grease
APHA,5520 B Partition Gravimetric
Method 0.60
mg/l 10 20 10
22
Table: 3.12Treated Effluent (ETP) result
*General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants (Part A): Effluents, as given in Schedule –VI, inserted by Rule 2(d) of
Environment (Protection) Second Amendment Rules, 1993 notified by GSR 422(E) dated 19.05.1993 published in Gazette no. 174 dated
19.05.1993.
S.
No. Parameter Test-Method Result Unit
*Standards
In-Land Surface Water
Public Sewers
Land for Irrigation
6. pH (at 25 0C) APHA, 4500-H+ B Electrometric
Method 7.44
-- 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0 5.5-9.0
7. COD APHA, 5220 B Open Reflux Method
76.58 mg/l 250 -- --
8. BOD (3 Days at 27
0C) APHA 5210 C / IS 3025,P-44,
22.04 mg/l 30 350 100
9. Total Suspended
Solids APHA, 2540 D Gravimetric Method 28.00
mg/l 100 600 200
10. Oil and Grease
APHA,5520 B Partition Gravimetric
Method 0.70
mg/l 10 20 10
23
3.6 SOIL MONITORING
3.6.1 Soil Monitoring Locations
The objective of the soil monitoring is to identify the impacts of project activities on soil
quality and also predict impacts, which have arisen due to execution of various
constructions allied activities. Accordingly, a study of assessment of the soil quality has
been carried out.
To assess impacts of ongoing project activities on the soil in the area, the Physico-chemical
characteristics of soils were examined by obtaining soil samples from selected points and
analysis of the same. Single sample of soil was collected from the project site for studying
soil characteristics, the location of which is listed in Table 3.13
Table 3.13 Details of Soil Quality Monitoring Location
S. No. Location Code Location Name/ Description
1. S1 Project Site
3.6.2 Methodology of Soil Monitoring
The sampling has been done in line with IS: 2720 & Methods of Soil Analysis, Part-1, 2nd
edition, 1986 of American Society for Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America. The
homogenized samples were analyzed for physical and chemical characteristics (physical,
chemical and heavy metal concentrations).
The samples have been analyzed as per the established scientific methods for Physico-
chemical parameters.
24
3.6.3 Soil Monitoring Results
Single sample of soil is collected from the site to check the quality of soil of the study area
.The Physico-chemical characteristics of the soil, as obtained from the analysis of the soil
sample, are presented in Table 3.14
*SOP-Laboratory Standard Operating Procedure.
#Chromium- This parameter is not covered our NABL scope.
3.6.4 Discussion on Soil Characteristics in the Study Area
The soil in study area is characterized by moderate organic content. The soil quality in the
project area has not been affected by the project activities.
S. No. Parameter Test-Method Result Unit
1. pH (at 25 0C) IS : 2720 (P-26) by pH Meter 7.43
--
2. Conductivity IS:14767 by Conductivity meter 0.325 mS/cm
3. Soil Texture IS : 2720 (P-22, RA2003) Silty Loam --
4. Color SOP , SP-78,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 Yellowish --
5. Water holding
capacity SOP , SP-81,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 31.68
%
6. Bulk density SOP , SP-80,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 1.62 gm/cc
7. Chloride as Cl SOP , SP-85,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 26.49 mg/100g
8. Calcium as Ca SOP , SP-82,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 35.12 mg/100g
9. Sodium as Na SOP , SP-84,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 17.43 mg/kg
10. Potassium as K SOP , SP-84,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 174.50 kg/hec.
11. Organic Matter IS:2720 (P-22) Titrimetric Method 0.49 %
12. Magnesium as Mg SOP , SP-83,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 12.40 mg/100g
13. Available Nitrogen as
N IS:14684 Distillation Method 310.00
kg./hec.
14. Available Phosphorus SOP , SP-86,Issue No.-01& Issue Date-14/02/2013 10.76 kg./hec.
15. Zinc (as Zn) USEPA 3050B 4.38 mg/kg
16. Manganese (as Mn ) USEPA 3050B 25.93 mg/kg
17. Lead (as Pb) USEPA 3050B 1.96 mg/kg
18. Cadmium (as Cd ) USEPA 3050B 0.55 mg/kg
19. Chromium (as Cr) USEPA 3050B 0.92 mg/kg
20. Copper (as Cu ) USEPA 3050B 2.90 mg/kg
25
3.7 DG Noise Monitoring Result
Table 3.15 DG noise level in the Study Area (Last six month average data)
DG Noise Monitoring Result (dB)A
DG No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Limit
DG & Capacity(KVA)
250 250 160 160 750 750 750 750 380 500
-
Open the Canopy of D.G. Set
(Leq)
97.43
96.35
98.40
96.18
92.85
98.45 94.34
91.56 96.10 95.35 -
Close the Canopy of D.G. Set (0.5 mtr
Distance) (Leq)
71.83 70.84 72.75 70.40 67.21 72.68 68.80 66.20 70.49 69.83
-
Insertion Loss 25.60 25.51 25.65 25.78 25.64 25.77 25.54 25.36 25.61 25.52
25
Conclusion
All environment monitoring results of ambient air, water, stack monitoring, noise and
waste water and soil result under permissible limit as per define CPCB standard limit.
There is no adverse impact on environment due to the project activities.
26
Site Photographs:
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Solar Energy System
Black Benjamin
trees near
administration
block
1-Neem Trees
near main car
parking are
2
27
Ambient Noise Level Monitoring
Waste water sampling
28
Water Sampling
Water Sampling
29
Stack Monitoring
top related